Attachment Exhibit A

This document pretains to SES-STA-20071120-01602 for Special Temporal Authority on a Satellite Earth Station filing.

IBFS_SESSTA2007112001602_606573

                EXHIBIT A

FREQUENCY COORDINATION AND INTERFERENCE
            ANALYSIS REPORT




          INTELSAT NORTH AMERICA LLC
           RASCom—1 LEOP STA REQUEST
             EARTH STATION E000296


                                            EXHIBIT A




FREQUENCY COORDINATION AND INTERFERENCE
 |       _ ANALYSIS REPORT


                     Prepared for
             Intelsat North America LLC
                   Clarksburg, MD
                   Rascom 1 LEOP
                Satellite Earth Station




                    Prepared By:
                    COMSEARCH
             19700 Janelia Farm Boulevard
                  Ashburn, VA 20147
                  November 16, 2007


                                                         TABLE OF CONTENTS .
1.   CONCLUSIONS..1 222022 202202202 098 e err e e reeseeaverereceressrerseccerereee. arsrerrsecserecererrserercrrerersrsrserssiensssessererscensecreersressseenes 3
2.   SUMMARY OF RESULTS....2.220202202ssrersssrsssrertsisetstsesvesssseriersessrersareserersecrsresosecsiersesrrerer ces es ace se esb ons na se e rereanenes 4
3.   SUPPLEMENTAL SHOWING ............eevesssrssescrerseetercsersssreresetetersriscerreccrsrsccerrersiecssresressiserenerssssressscerescserensres 5
4.   EARTH STATION COORDINATION DATA ...,22022020200200e9eserseseserrerserecearerisesscces s cce en se ieb es ces es reesersrernererrre n en se nee T
5.   CERTIFICATION 1..2222202222222srrrrsrrseereserresiressreivissesersecssteristsessrerestertrercerterstriscesisessssesreriserereeresersvercertser se ces ine s 11




Frequency Coordination and Interference Analysis Report                                                   11/16/2007                         Page 2 of 11


1. CONCLUSIONS



An interference study considering all existing, proposed and prior coordinated microwave
facilities within the coordination contours of the proposed earth station demonstrates that
this site will operate satisfactorily with the common carrier microwave environment.
Further, there will be no restrictions of its operation due to interference considerations.




Frequency Coordination and Interference Analysis Report      11/16/2007           Page 3 of 11


2. SUMMARY OF RESULTS



A number of great circle interference cases were identified during the interference study of
the proposed earth station. Each of the cases, which exceeded the interference objective
on a line—of—sight basis, was profiled and the propagation losses estimated using NBS
TN101 (Revised) techniques. The losses were found to be sufficient to reduce the signal
levels to acceptable magnitudes in every case.



There are no unresolved interference cases involving this earth station.




Frequency Coordination and Interference Analysis Report    11/16/2007      >   Page 4 of 11 _


3. SUPPLEMENTAL SHOWING
Pursuant to Part 25.203(c) of the FCC Rules and Regulations, the satellite earth station proposed in this
application was coordinated by Comsearch using computer techniques and in accordance with Part 25 of
the FCC Rules and Regulations.

Verbal and written coordination was conducted with the below listed carriers.

        Company
        ALLTEL Communications of VA No. 1, Inc.
        ALLTEL Communications of Virginia, Inc.
        AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF MARYLAND INC
        AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF VIRGINIA INC
        AT&T CORP
        Allegheny Power Service Corporatlon
        Atlantic Broadband (Delmar), LLC
        Atlantic Broadband (Penn), LLC
        Atlantic City Electric Company
        BAY BROADBAND COMMUNICATIONS LLC
        BAYCOMM INC
        BEDFORD COUNTY
        Baltimore Gas and Electric Company
        CHESTER, COUNTY OF
        COLLEGE OF SOUTHERN MARYLAND
        COLUMBIA COUNTY
        Cambria, County of
        Cellco Partnership — Bridgeville, PA
        Cellco Partnership — VA, MD, WV, DC
        Cellco Partnership— PA Region
        Cellco Partnership—Newark—Dallas Verizon
        Cellco Prtnrshp — Phil. Tri—State Rgn
        Charles, County of
        Charlottesville Cellular Partnership
        Cingular Pennsylvania, LLC
        Conterra Ultra Broadband, LLC
        County of Frederick
        County of York
        DAUPHIN COUNTY EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
        DELAWARE STATE — DTI
        Delmarva Power & Light Company
        Dobson Cellular Systems, Inc.
        Enoch Pratt Free Library
        Exelon Generation Company, L.L. C
        FIRST TELEVISION CORP.(MID—ATLANTIC)
        Federal Communications Commission
        Frederick County
        Gloucester County
        HANOVER COUNTY
        HUNTINGDON COUNTY, PA



Frequency Coordination and Interference Analysis Report                11/16/2007         Page 5 of 11


       Hampton Roads Planning District Commissi
       Hardy Cellular Telephone Company
       Harrisonburg—Rockingham ECC
       International Communications Group, Inc.
       LB Tower Company LLC
       Last Mile Inc.
       Local Communications Network, Inc.
       Loudoun County, Virginia
       MARYLAND PUBLIC BROADCASTING COMMISSION
       MCI Communication Services, Inc.
       METROPOLITAN AREA NETWORKS, INC.
       Maryland State Highway Administration
       Maryland, State of — Budget & Management
       NTELOS Telephone, Inc.
       New Cingular Wireless PCS — VA, MD, DC
       New Cingular Wireless PCS LLC — DC
       New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC — PA
       New Jersey, State of —NJ Tramsit
       Northern Virginia Electric Cooperative
       PENNSYLVANIA TURNPIKE COMMISSION
       PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY
       PSEG Services Corporation
       Peco Energy Company
       Penn Service Microwave Co., Inc.
       Petersburg Cellular Partnership
       Prince George‘s County
       RAPPAHANNOCK ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE
       RCTC Wholesale Corporation
       STAFFORD COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT
       Southern & Central Wireless, LLC
       Southern Maryland Electric Cooperative
       State of Maryland, MIEMSS
       State of WV DHHR/BPH State Trauma
       Susquehanna Electric Company
       Time Warner Cable LLC
       Trinity Broadcasting Network Inc
       USCOC of Cumberland, Inc.
       USCOC of Virginia RSA #2, Inc.
       VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH STATE POLICE
       Verizon Maryland, Inc.
       Verizon    Virginia, Inc.
       Virginia   Cellular Inc.
       Virginia   Commonwealth
       Virginia   Electric & Power Company
       Virginia PCS Alliance, L.C.
       Virginia RSA #7, Inc.
       WITF Inc.
       Washington D.C. SMSA L.P.
       Wireless Strategies, Inc.
       YORK COUNTY VIRGINIA




Frequency Coordination and Interference Analysis Report   11/16/2007   j   Page 6 of 11


4. EARTH STATION COORDINATION DATA
This section presents the data pertinent to frequency coordination of the proposed earth station that was
circulated to all carriers within its coordination contours.




Frequency Coordination and Interference Analysis Report             11/16/2007            Page 7 of 11


                                                           WUITGLFAINWET
                                                        Earth Station Data Sheet
                                               19700 Janelia Farm Boulevard, Ashburn, VA 20147
                                                 (703)726—5500 http://www.comsearch.com

Date:                                   _ 11/16/2007
Administrative Information
Status                                     TEMPORARY (Operation from 12/18/2007 to 06/18/2008)
Licensee Name                              Intelsat North America LLC
Site Information                           CLARKSBURG, MD
Latitude (NAD 83)                        39° 13‘ 2.9" N
Longitude (NAD 83)                      ~77° 16 15.0" W
Climate Zone          '                  A
Rain Zone                                2
 Ground Elevation (AMSL)                 118.15 m / 387.6 ft
Link Information
Satellite Type                             Low Earth Orbit
Mode                                       TO — Transmit—Only
Modulation                                 FM Digital
Minimum Elevation Angle                    5.0°
Azimuth Range                              0.0° to 360°
Antenna Centerline (AGL)                   5.49 m / 18.0 ft

Antenna Information                              Transmit
 Manufacturer                                    VERTEX RSI
 Gain / Diameter                                 53.6 dBi / 9.0 m
 3—dB / 15—dB Beamwidth                          0.20° / 0.40°

 Max Available RF Power         (dBW/4 kHz)      10.2
                                (dBW/MHz)        34.2

 Maximum EIRP                   {dBW/A4 kHz)     63.8
           '                    (dBW/MHz)        87.8
                                (dBW)            87.1

—Interference Objectives:     Long Term          ~151.0 dBW/4 kHz 20%
                              Short Term         —128.0 dBW/4 kHz 0.0025%

 Frequency Information                           Transmit 61 GHz
 Emission / Frequency Range (MHz)                850KNON / 6182.0
                                                 850OKNON / 6183.5


 Max Great Circle Coordination Distance          214.8 km / 133.5 mi
 Precipitation Scatter Contour Radius            351.6 km / 218.4 mi




 Frequency Coordination and Interference Analysis Report                      11/16/2007         Page 8 of 11


                                                     COMSEARCEHA
                                                  Earth Station Data Sheet
                                      19700 Janelia Farm Boulevard, Ashburn, VA 20147
                                        {703)726—5500 http://www.comsearch.com



 Coordination Values             _ CLARKSBURG, MD
 Licensee Name                    Intelsat North America LLC
 Latitude (NAD 83)                 39° 13‘ 2.9" N
 Longitude (NAD 83)                77° 16‘ 15.0" W
 Ground Elevation (AMSL)           118.15 m / 387.6 ft
 Antenna Centerline (AGL)          5.49 m / 18.0 ft
 Antenna Mode _                           Transmit 61 GHz
 Interference Objectives: Long Term       —151.0 dBW/4 kHz 20%
                          Short Term      —128.0 dBW/4 kHz 0.0025%
 Max Available RF Power                   10.2 (dBW/4 kHz)

                                                                Transmit 6.1 GHz
                 Horizon           Antenna                  Horizon       Coordination
 Azimuth (°)     Elevation (°)     Discrimination (°)    _ Gain (dBi) . Distance (km)
  0               116               98.13     j                4.50       214.80
  5               112               93.13                    ~ 4.50       214.80
 10               1.02              88.13                      4.50       214.80
 15               0.87              83.13                      4.50       214.80
 20               0.96              78.13                      4.50       214.80
 25               111               7313                       4.50       214.80
 30               1.29              68.13                   ~— 4.50       214.80
 35               1.02              63.13                      4.50       214.80
 40               0.93              58.13                      4.50       214.80
 45               1.08              53.13                      4.50       214.80
 50               1.20              4813                       4.50       214.80
 55               0.87              43.13                      4.50 .     214.80
 60               0.70              38.13                      4.50       214.80
 65               0.73              33.13                      4.50       214.80
 70               0.93              28.13                      4.50       214.80
 75               0.76              23.13                      4.50       214.80
 80               0.76              1813                       4.50       214.80
 85               0.76               13.14                     4.50       214.80
 90               0.69               814                       4.50       214.80
 95               0.61                317                      4.50       214.80
 100              0.71                1.92                     4.50       214.80
 105              0.76                6.88                     4.50       214.80
 110              0.71               11.88                     4.50       214.80
 115              0.67               16.88                     4.50       214.80
 120              0.73              21.87—                     4.50       214.80
 125              0.70              26.87                     4.50         214.80
  130             0.60              31.87                     4.50         214.80
  135             0.48              36.87                     4.50         214.80
  140             0.48              41.87                     4.50         214.80
< 145             0.29              46.88                     4.50         214.80
  150             0.28              51.87                     4.50         214.80
  155             0.23              56.87                     4.50         214.80
 160              0.29              61.87                     4.50         214.80
 165              0.26               66.87                    4.50        214.80
 170 .            0.00              ~71.87                    4.50        214.80
 175              0.00               76.87                    4.50        214.80
  180             0.00               81.87                    4.50         214.80
  185             0.00               86.87                    4.50         214.80




  Frequency Coordination and Interference Analysis Report               11/16/2007       Page 9 of 11


                                                                                               COMSEARCH
                                                                                          Earth Station Data Sheet
                                                                                 19700 Janelia Farm Boulevard, Ashburn, VA 20147
                                                                                   {703)726—5500 http://www.comsearch.com



 Coordination Values                                                        CLARKSBURG, MD
 Licensee Name                                                              Intelsat North America LLC
 Latitude (NAD 83)                                              _           39°13‘2.9" N
 Longitude (NAD 83)                                                         77° 16‘ 15.0" Ww
 Ground Elevation (AMSL)                                        11815 m / 387.6 ft
 Antenna Centerline (AGL)                                                   5.49 m / 18.0 ft
 Antenna Mode                                                                      Transmit 6.1 GHz
_ Interference Objectives: Long Term                                               —151.0 dBW/4 kHz 20%
                           Short Term                                              —128.0 dBW/4 kHz © 0.0025%
  Max Available RF Power                                                           10.2 (dBW/4 kHz)

                             .                      .                                                              Transmit 6.1 GHz
                                     Horizon                                 Antenna                           Horizon          Coordination
. Azimuth (°)                        Elevation (°)                           Discrimination (°)                Gain (dBi)       Distance (km)
  190        _                        0.00                                    91.87                             4.50   .      214.80
  195                                 0.00                                    96.87                             4.50          214.80
  200                                 0.42                                   101.87                             4.50          214.80
  205                                 0.92                                   106.87                             4.50          214.80
  210                                 1.05                                   111.87                        _    4.50          214.80
  215                .                0.75                                   116.87                             4.50          214.80
  220                                 0.92                                   121.87                             4.50          214.80
  225                                 1.05                                   126.87                             4.50       ._ 214.80
  230                                 0.90      .                            131.87            20               4.50          214.80
  235                                ~111                                    136.87                             4.50          214.80
  240                                 1.48                                   141.87                   .0        4.50          214.80
  245                                 1.48                                   146.87                             4.50          214.80
  250                                 1.76                                   151.86                             4.50          214.80
  255                                 1.76                                   156.86                             4.50     _    214.80
  260                                 1.97 >                                 161.85                             4.50 —       —214.80
  265                                 1.98                                    166.84                             4.50           214.80
  270                                 2.29              |                    171.79                             4.50            214.80
  275                                 2.18                                   176.46                             4.50            214.80
  280                    _            2.68                                   177.57                             4.50            214.80
  285                                 2.68,                         .        172.96   '                         4.50            214.80
  290    _                       /    3.05                                   167.98                             4.50            214.80
  295                                 3.13                                   163.02                             4.50            214.80
  300                                 3.49                                   158.01               .             4.50            214.80
  305                                 3.19                                   153.06                             4.50            214.80
  310                                 3.64                                   148.04                             4.50            214.80
  315                                 3.56                                   143.06                             4.50            214.80
~ 320                                 3.19                              —    138.09                             4.50            214.80
  325                                 3.05                                   133.10                             4.50            214.80
  330                                 2.65                                   128.11                             4.50            214.80
  335            —                    2.18                                   12312  _                           4.50            214.80
  340                                 1.94                                   118.13                             4.50            214.80
  345.                                1.45                                   113.13                             4.50 >          214.80
  350                                 1.45                  '                108.13                             4.50            214.80
  355                                 113                                    10313                              4.50        _   214.80




  Freqauency Coordination. and Interference Analysis Report                                                                 11/16/2007          Page 10 of 11


5. CERTIFICATION




1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT | AM THE TECHNICALLY QUALIFIED PERSON RESPONSIBLE FOR THE
PREPARATION OF THE FREQUENCY COORDINATION DATA CONTAINED IN THIS APPLICATION,
THAT | AM FAMILIAR WITH PARTS 101 AND 25 OF THE FCC RULESAND REGULATIONS, THAT 1
HAVE EITHER PREPARED OR REVIEWED THE FREQUENCY COORDINATION DATA SUBMITTED
WITH THIS APPLICATION, AND THAT IT IS COMPLETE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY
KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF.                                   .  '




Timothy 0. Crutcher
Frequency Planner
COMSEARCH
19700 Janelia Farm Boulevard
Ashburn, VA 20147


DATED: November 16, 2007




Frequency Coordination and Interference Analysis Report   11/16/2007   Page 11 of 11


              EXHIBIT B

SCHEDULE B — TECHNICAL INFORMATION




       INTELSAT NORTH AMERICA LLC
        RASCom—1 LEOP STA REQUEST
          EARTH STATION E000296


                                                                                                                                                                                                                          EXHIBIT I
                                                                                           |                                                                                             .                       Page 1: Locatiot
glglge 3 12              .                                                   FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION                                                                                               »
                                     APPLICATION FOR SATELLITE SPACE AND EARTH STATION AUTHORIZATIONS
                                                        Technical and Operational Description)
                                                                                      (Place an "X" in one of the blocks below)

@ STA REQUEST                DReglstratlon of new Domestic D Amendment to a Pending Application D Modification of Llcense/Reglstratlon D Notlficatlon of Minor Modification
                                           Receive—Only Station                                                                                                                                                                       wo—


B1. Location of Earth Station Site. If temporary—fixed, mobile, or VSAT remote facility, specify area of operation and point of contact. If VSAT hub station, give its location
                                    For VSAT networks attach individual Schedule B, Page 1 sheets for each hub station and each remote station. Ind1v1dua11y provide the
                                    Location, Points of Communications, and Destination Points for each hub and remote station.
Bla. Station Call Sign           B1b. Site identifier (HUB, REMOTE1, etc.)                    B1c. Telephone Number                                B1j. Geographic Coordinates                       N/S,               Blk. Lat./Lon. i
               |                                              .                                        (202)—944—7538                                     Deg. —      Min. — Sec. — E/W                                 Coordinates are:
B1d. Mailing Street Address of Station or Area of Operation             Ble. Name of Contact Person                                            .                                                                             |
22021 COMSAT Drive                                                           Angela Maimo                                                          Lat.           39°— 13‘ — 02.9" N                                    D NAD—27
                                                                                                                                                   Lon.       77°—   0 L
                                                                                                                                                                           16‘   9   _
                                                                                                                                                                                             —15.0" W
                                                                                                                                                                                                59
                                                                                                                                                                                                                       _ NAD—$3

BIf. City                                B1g. County                          —                              Blh. State    Bli. Zip Code   |                         B11. Site Elevation (AMSL)                                        _
Clarksburg                                    Montgomery                                           0            Md                20871                       J       11815                                                            _

B2. Points of Communications:                 List the names and orbit locations of all satellites with which this earth station will communicate. The entry "ALSAT"is sufficient to identify
                                  the names and locations of all satellite facilities licensed by the U.S. All non—U.S. licensed satellites must be listed individually.                                                               _
Satellite Name and Orbit Location                       Satellite Name and Orbit Location                                Satellite Name and Orbit Location                                                                             _
Rascom 1 LEOP Operations




B3. Destination points for communications using non—U.S. licensed satellites. For each non—U.S. licensed satellite facility identified in section B2 above, specify the destination
      s) (countries) where the services will be       this earth station via each non—U S. license satellite        Use additional sheets as needed.
Satellite Name       _                               List of Destination Points




                                                                                                                                                                                                            FCC 312, Schedule B — Page ]
                                                                                                                                                                                                                       April 13, 1996


                                                                                                                                                                                                                    EXHIBIT
                                                                                                     |                                                                                                Page 2: Antenna:s
                                                                      FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
                                        APPLICATION FOR SATELLITE SPACE AND EARTH STATION AUTHORIZATIONS
                                               FCC Form 312 — Schedule B:; (Technical and Operational Description)
B4. Earth Station Antenna Facilities:; Use additional                             as needed.

      (a) Site ID*®                            (b)                             (c)                       (d) Manufacturer                    (e) Model                           (£)                         (g) Antenna Gain
       >                                 Antenna ID**                       Quantity                                                                                       Antenna Size                Transmit and/or Receive
                                                                                                                                                                              (meters)                 (        dBi at     GHz)

                                              9.0                                    -                     Vertex/RSI                          KPC                               9                         53.6 dBi@     6 GHz




            B5. Antenna Heights and Maximum Power Limits: (The corresponding Antenna ID in tables B4 and B5 applies to the same antenha)
                                                   Maximum Antenna Height         (e) Building     (£) Maximum        (g) Total Input
                        (a)             (b) Antenna Structure           (c) Above               (d) Above             Height Above           Antenna Height               Power at              (h) Total EIRP
                      Antenna              Registration No.            Ground Level          Mean Sea Level           Ground Level           Above Rooftop             antenna flange            for all carriers
                       ID**                                              (meters)               {(meters)              (meters)***            {(meters)***                (Watts)                    (dBW)
                      9.0M                                                 10.0                  128.15                                                                    2250                      87.1




            Notes:        *     If this is an application for a VSAT network, identify the site (Item B1b, Schedule B, Page 1) where each antenna is located. Also include this Site—ID on Schedule B, Page 5.
                         **     Identify each antenna in VSAT networkor multi—antenna station with a unique identifier, such as HUB, REMOTE1, A1, A2, 10M, 12M, 7M, etc. Use this same antenna ID
                                throughout tables B4, B5, B6, and B7 when referring to the same antenna.
                        ***     Attach sketch of site or exemption, See 47 CFR Part 17.
                                                                                                                                                                                                  FCC 312, Schedule B — Page 2
                                                                                                                                                                                                                 April 13, 1999


                                                                                                                                                                                                                   EXHIBIT F

                                                                                                                                                                                                  Page 3: Coordination
                                                 FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
                                     APPLICATION FOR SATELLITE SPACE AND EARTH STATION AUTHORIZATIONS
                                            FCC Form 312 — Schedule B:; (Technical and Operational Description)
B6. F           Coordination Limits: Use additional                           as needed.

     (a)                           (b)                           (c) Range of              (d) Range of           (e) Antenna              (£) Antenna          (g) Earth Station        (b) Earth Station    (i) Maximum EIRP
 Antenna ID*        —        Frequency Limits                    Satellite Arc             Satellite Arc        Elevation Angle          Elevation Angle         Azimuth Angle            Azimuth Angle       Density toward the
                                                               Eastern Limit**           Western Limit**         Eastern Limit            Western Limit           Eastern Limit       —_ Western Limit       Horizon (dBW/4kHz)
    9.0M                          6182.0                            LEOP                    LEOP                       53°                      5° _                 LEOP                   LEOP                     14.7
    9.0M                          6183.5                            LEOP             .      LEOP                       5°                       5°                   LEOP                   LEOP                     14.7




           Notes:        *   Provide the ANTENNA—ID from table B4 to identify the antenna to which each frequency band and orbital are range is associated.
                        **   If operating with geostationary satellites, give the orbital arc limits and the associated elevation and azimuth angles. If operating with non—geostationary satellites,
                             give the notation "NON—GEO" for the satellite arc and give the minimum operational elevation angle and the maximum azimuth angle range.




                                                                                                                                                                                                     FCC 312, Schedule B — Page 3
                                                                                                                                                                                                                April 13, 1998


                                                                                                                                                                                   EXHLBIT J
                                                               '                                                                                                    Page 4: Particular:
                                           FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
                               APPLICATION FOR SATELLITE SPACE AND EARTH STATION AUTHORIZATIONS
                                      FCC Form 312 — Schedule B: (Technical and Operational Description)
B7. Particulars of      tion     (Full         are            for each r.f. carrier): Use additional   pa          as needed.

     (a)                   (b)                (c)    (d) Antenna        (e)         (£) Maximum    {g) Maximum                        (b) Description of Modulation and Services
 Antenna ID*         Frequency Limits    —    T/R    Polarization     Emission        EIRP per     EIRP Density
                          (MHz)              Mode     (H,V,L,R)      Designator    Carrier (dBW)    per Carrier
                                              ook       .                                           dBW,                 .
    9.0M.              © 6182.0               T          V,C        850KNON .          87.1                 63.8         FM with BPSK Subcarrier and PCM Data
    9.0M                 6183.5               T          V,C        850KNON            87.1                 63.8        . FM with BPSK Subcarrier and PCM Data




                                                                                                                                                                  FCC 312, Schedule B — Page 4
                                                                                                                                                                               April 13, 1998


                                                                                                                                                                                           EXHLBIT J

                                                                                                                                                                           Page 5: Question:
                                                FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
                                    APPLICATION FOR SATELLITE SPACE AND EARTH STATION AUTHORIZATIONS
                                           FCC Form 312 — Schedule B: (Technical and Operational Description)


If VSAT Network, provide the SITE—ID (Item B1b) of the station that B8—B13 are in response to (HUB, REMOTE1, etc.):


B&8. If the proposed antenna(s) operate in the Fixed Satellite Service (FSS) with geostationary satellites, do(es) the proposed antenna(s)
    comply with the antenna gain patterns specified in Section 25.209(a) and (b) as demonstrated by the manufacturer‘s qualification                  YES               D NO
    measurements? _If NO, provide as an exhibit, a technical analysis showing compliance with two—degreespacing policy.                                                                .
B9. If the proposed antenna(s) do not operate in the Fixed Satellite Service (FSS), or if they operate in the Fixed Satellite Service
    (FSS) with non—geostationary satellites, do(es) the proposed antenna(s) comply with the antenna gain patterns specified in                     D YES       N/A      D NO
    Section 25.209(a2) and (b) as demonstrated by the manufacturer‘s qualification measurement?
B1Q. Is the facility operated by remote control? If YES, provide the location and telephone number of the control point.
                                                                                                                                                   [] vEs               J no
       |
     ~— Remote Control Point Location:
           B1Oa. Street Address


           B10b. City                                              B1Qc. County                                       B10.d. State/Country             B10s. Zip Code

           B1Of. Telephone Number                                                           B1i0g. Call Sign of Control Station (if appropriate)


B11. Is frequency coordination required? If YES, attach a frequency coordination report as an exhibit.
                                                                                                                                                      YES               J no
B12. Is coordination with another country required? If YES, attach the name of the country(ies)
     and plot of coordination contours as an exhibit.                                                                                              I:] YES                  NO

B13. FAA Notification — (See 47 CFT Part 17and 47 CFT Part 25.113(c))                                                                                                              .
     Where FAA notification is required, have you attached a copy of a completed FCC Form 854                                                      [_] v¥Es             [ No
     and/or the FAA‘s study regarding the potential hazard of the structure to aviation? EXISTING FACILITY
     FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH 47 CFT PARTS 17 AND 25 WILL RESULT IN THE RETURN OF THIS APPLICATION




                                                                                                                                                                        FCC 312, Schedule B — Page !
                                                                                                                                                                                   April 13, 1998


         EXHIBIT C

RADIATION HAZARD REPORT




  INTELSAT NORTH AMERICA LLC
   RASCom—1 LEOP STA REQUEST
     EARTH STATION E000296


                                                                                        EXHIBIT C
  Radiation Hazard Report                                                               Page 1 of 5

       Analysis of Non—lonizing Radiation for a 9.0—Meter Earth
                          |               Station System
   This report analyzes the non—ionizing radiation levels for a 9.0—meter earth station system. The
   analysis and calculations performed in this report comply with the methods described in the FCC
   Office of Engineering and Technology Bulletin, No. 65 first published in 1985 and revised in 1997
 _ in Edition 97—01. The radiation safety limits used in the analysis are in conformance with the FCC
   R&O 96—326. Bulletin No. 65 and the FCC R&O specifies that there are two separate tiers of
   exposure limits that are dependant on the situation in which the exposure takes place and/or the
   status of the individuals who are subject to the exposure. The Maximum Permissible Exposure
   (MPE) limits for persons in a General Population/Uncontrolled environment are shown in Table 1.
— The General Population/Uncontrolled MPE is a function of transmit frequency and is for an
   exposure period of thirty minutes or less. The MPE limits for persons in an
  Occupational/Controlled environment are shown in Table 2. The Occupational MPE is a function of
  transmit frequency and is for an exposure period of six minutes or less. The purpose of the
  analysis described in this report is to determine the power flux density levels of the earth station in
  the far—field, near—field, transition region, between the subreflector or feed and main reflector
  surface, at the main reflector surface, and between the antenna edge and the ground and to
  compare these levels to the specified MPEs.

                 Table 1. Limits for General Population/Uncontrolled Exposure (MPE)

                    Frequency Range (MHz)          __Power Density {mW/em")
                                 30—300                             0.2
                                300—1500                 Frequency (MHz)*(0.8/1200)
                              1500—100,000                          1.0
                      Table 2. Limits for OccdpationaI/ControIled Exposure (MPE)
                    Frequency Range (MHz)          __Power Density (mW/cm*)
                                 30—300              .              1.0
                                300—1500                 Frequency (MHz)*(4.0/1200)
                              1500—100,000                          5.0

            Table 3. Formulas and Parameters Used for Determining Power Flux Densities
       Parameter                     Symbol              Formula               Value            Units
       Antenna Diameter               D                    Input                9.0             m
       Antenna Surface Area          * Asurface           1 D/ 4               63.62            m
       Subreflector Diameter             Dsr               Input                117.0           cm
       Area of Subreflector              Asr              x Ds "/4            10751.32          cm*
       Frequency                         F                 Input          _     6182            MHz
       Wavelength                        A                300 /F              0.048528          m
       Transmit Power                    P                 Input               2250.00          W
       Antenna Gain (dBi)               Ges                Input                 53.6           dBi
       Antenna Gain (factor)             G                1 oces"             229086.8          n/a
       Pi                                 T              Constant             3.1415927         n/a
       Antenna Efficiency                 n              GN/(r‘D")              0.67            n/a


_                                                                                   EXHIBIT C
Radiation Hazard Report                 ‘                                   .       Page 2 of5



1.     AFar Field Distance Calculation

The distance to the beginning of the far field can be determined from the following equation:

     Distance to the Far Field Région                       Ry =0.60 D/ a                        (1)
                                                               = 1001.5 m

The maximum main beam power density in the far field can be determined from the following
equation:

     On—Axis Power Density in the Far Field         .       S; =GP/(41Rg")                       (2)
                                                                = 40.896 W/m*
                                                                = 4.090 mW/cm*

2.      Near Field Calculation

Power flux density is considered to be at a maximum value throughout the entire length of the
defined Near Field region. The region is contained within a cylindrical volume having the same
diameter as the antenna. Past the boundary of the Near Field region, the power density from the
antenna decreases linearly with respect to increasing distance.

The distance to the end of the Near Field can be determined from the following equation:

     Extent of the Near Field     _                         Ry =DA/(42)         c      >         (3)
                                                               = 417.3 m
The maximum power density in the Near Field can be determined from the following equation:

     Near Field Power Density °                         _   S =216.01P/(1 D)                     (4)
                                                                = 95.470 W/im
                                                                = 9.547 mWi/icm*

3.      Transition Region Calculation

The Transition region is located between the Near and Far Field regions. The power density
begins to decrease linearly with increasing distance in the Transition region. While the power
density decreases inversely with distance in the Transition region, the power density decreases
inversely with the square of the distance in the Far Field region. The maximum power density in
the Transition region will not exceed that calculated for the Near Field region. The power density
calculated in Section 1 is the highest power density the antenna can produce in any of the regions
away from the antenna. The power density at a distance R, can be determined from the following
equation:

     Transition Region Power Density                        S =Sy Ry/R                           (5)
                                                                = 9.547 mW/icm*              t


                                                     .        .                   EXHIBIT C
  Radiation Hazard Report                                                         Page 3 of 5


_ 4.      Region between the Main Reflector and the Subreflector

  Transmissions from the feed assembly are directed      toward the subreflector surface, and are
  reflected back toward the main reflector. The most     common feed assemblies are waveguide
  flanges, horns or subreflectors. The energy between    the subreflector and the reflector surfaces
  can be calculated by determining the power density     at the subreflector surface. This can be
  determined from the following equation:

       Power Density at the Subreflector                    Ssr = 4000 P / Ag,                  _ (6)
                                                                  = 837.107 mW/cm*
  5.      Main Reflector Region

  The power density in the main reflector is determined in the same manner as the power density at
  the subreflector. The area is now the area of the main reflector aperture and can be determined
  from the following equation:

       Power Density at the Main Reflector Surface       Ssurface Z4 P / Asurface _               (7)
                           '                                      = 141.471 W/im*
                                                                  = 14.147 mWi/icm*


  6.      Region between the Main Reflector and the Ground

  Assuming uniform illumination of the reflector surface, the power density between the antenna and
  the ground can be determined from the following equation:

       Power Density between Reflector and Ground           Sg =P / Asurface                      (8)
              -                                                   = 35.368 W/m*
                                                                  = 3.537 mW/cm*


                                                                                     EXHIBIT C
Radiation Hazard Report                                                              Page 4 of 5


7.      Suinmary of Calculations

           Table 4. Summary of Expected Radiation levels for Uncontrolled Environment
                                               Calculated Maximum
                                          Radiation Power Density Level
Region                                                 (mW/cm?*)                   Hazard Assessment
1. Far Field (R;= 1001.5 m)                       S¢          4.090                  Potential Hazard
2. Near Field (Ry; = 417.3 m)                     Snat        9.547                  Potential Hazard
3. Transition Region (R,; < R, < R&g)             S;          9.547                  Potential Hazard
4. Between       Main    Reflector    and         Ssr       837.107                  Potential Hazard
    Subreflector
5. Main Reflector                                 Ssurface   ___14.147               Potential Hazard
6. Between Main Reflector and Ground              Sy           3.537                 Potential Hazard

             Table 5. Summary of Expected Radiation levels for Controlled Environment
                                             Calculated Maximum
                                           Radiation Power Density
Region                                          Level (mW/cm")              Hazard Assessment
1. Far Field (R;= 1001.5 m)                     S¢          4.090            Satisfies FCC MPE
2. Near Field (Ry; = 417.3 m)                   Sor         9.547             Potential Hazard
3. Transition Region (Ry < R,; < Rg)            St          9.547             Potential Hazard
4. Between       Main    Reflector   and        Sss      837.107               Potential Hazard
    Subreflector             |
5. Main Reflector                                    Ssurface   ___14.147            Potential Hazard
6. Between Main Reflector and Ground                 Sy          3.537             . Satisfies FCC MPE

It is the applicant‘s responsibility to ensure that the public and operational personnel are not
exposed to harmful levels of radiation.



8.      Conclusions

This antenna will be located in a fenced area. The fenced are will be sufficient to prohibit the _
general public from having access the areas that exceed the MPE limits

_ Since one diameter removed from the main beam of the antenna or %% diameter removed from the
  edge of the antenna the RF levels are reduced by a factor of 100 or 20 dB. None of the areas
  exceeding the MPE levels will be accessible by the general public.

 Radiation hazard signs will be posted while this earth station is in operation.

The applicant will ensure that no buildings orother obstacles will be in the areas that exceed the
MPE levels.


                                                                              EXHIBIT C
  Radiation Hazard Report                                                     Page 5 of 5

  Means of Compliance Controlled Areas


 The earth station‘s operational personnel will not have ‘access to the areas that exceed the MPE
 levels while the earth station is in operation.

_ The transmitters will be turned off during antenna maintenance.


       EXHIBIT D

  WAIVER REQUEST




INTELSAT NORTH AMERICA LLC
 RASCom—1 LEOP STA REQUEST
   EARTH STATION E000296


                                             Exhibit D

                PETITION FOR WAIVER OF SECTIONS 25.137 AND 25.114

       Pursuant to Section 25.137 of the Federal Communications Commission‘s
("Commission" or "FCC") rules, earth station applicants "requesting authority to operate with a
non—U.S. licensed space station to serve the United States" must demonstrate that effective _
competitive opportunities exist and must prov1de the same technical information required by
Section 25.114 for U.S.—licensed space stations." Intelsat herein seeks authority to provide
launch and early orbit phase ("LEOP") services —— not commercial services —— to the Umted
States, and thus believes that Section 25.137 does not apply.

       To the extent the Commission determines, however, that Intelsat‘s request for authority to
provide LEOP services on a special temporary basis is a request to serve the United States with a
non U.S.—licensed satellite,Intelsat respectfully requests a waiver of Sections 25.137 and 25.114
of the Commission‘s rules." The Commission may grant a waiver for good cause shown." The
Commission typically grants a walver where the partlcular facts make strict compliance
inconsistent with the public interest.* In granting a waiver, the Commission may take into
account cons1derat10ns of hardship, equity, or more effective implementation of overall policy on
an individual basis." Waiver is therefore appropriate if special circumstances warrant a deviation
from the general rule, and such a deviation will serve the public interest.

         In this case, gobd cause exists for a waiver of both Section 25.137 and Section 25.114.
With respect to Section 25.114, Intelsat seeks authority only to provide LEOP services for the
_RASCom—1 satellite. Intelsat has already provided with its STA request all the technical
 information relating to the LEOP services that Intelsat will be performing. The information
sought by Section 25.114 is not relevant to LEOP services. Moreover, Intelsat does not have —
‘and would not easily be able to obtain —— such information because Intelsat is not the operator of
the RASCom—1 satellite, nor is Intelsat in contractual privity with that operator. Rather, Intelsat
has a contract with Telespazio, which was hired by Thales, the manufacturer of the RASCom—1
satellite, to conduct LEOP services for the satellite.

        The information that Intelsat is not including is not required to determine potential
harmful interference. The Schedule S information for this satellite would pertain to the operation
of the RASCom—1 satellite at its final orbital location. However, the present application for
LEOP services involves communications prior to the satellite attaining its final location in the
geostationary orbit. In other words, during the LEOP mission, the earth station will not be

 \ 47 CF.R. § 25.137 (emphasis added).

 247 C.F.R. §§ 25.137 and 25.114.
 347 C.FR. § 1.3.
 * NE. Cellular Tel. Co. v. FCC, 897 F.24 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) ("Northeast Cellular®).

 5 WAITRadiov. FCC, 418 F.24 1153, 1159 (D.C. Cit. 1969); Northeast Cellular, 897 F.2d at
 1166.           |


communicating with a satellite located in the geostationary orbit. Rather, it will be transmitting
to a satellite traveling on its "transfer orbit" or "LEOP path", which starts immediately following
its separation from a launch vehicle, and ends when the satellite reaches its geostationary orbital
location. Moreover, as with any STA, Intelsat will perform the LEOP services on a non—
interference basis.

        Because it is not relevant to the service for which Intelsat seeks authorization, and
because obtaining the information would be a hardship, Intelsat seeks a waiver of all the
information required by Section 25.114. As noted above, Intelsat has provided the required
technical information that is relevant to the LEOP services for which Intelsat seeks authorization.

         Good cause also exists to waive Section 25.137. Section 25.137 is designed to ensure
that "U.S.—licensed satelhte systems have effective competitive opportunities to provide
analogous services" in other countries." Here, there is no service being provided by the satellite;
it is simply being placed in its orbital location after separating from the launch vehicle. Thus, the
purpose of the information required by Section 25.137 is not implicated here. For example,
Section 25.137(d) requires earth station applicants requesting authority to 0 7perate with a non—
U.S.—licensed space station that is not in orbit and operating to post a bond.‘ The underlying
purpose in having to post a bond—i.e., to prevent warehousing of orbital locations by operators
seeking to serve the United States—would not be served by requiring Intelsat to post a bond in
order to provide approximately 10 days of LEOP services to the RASCom—1 satellite.

     It is Intelsat‘s understanding that RASCom—1 will operate against ITU filings held by
RASCOM, an 1ntergovernmenta1 organization, and will be operated by RASCOMStar, a
Mauritius company.© It is also Intelsat‘s understanding that at 2.85° E.L., RASCom—1 will not
serve the United States. Thus, the purposes of Section 25.137—to ensure that U.S. satellite
operators enjoy "effective competitive opportunities" to serve foreign markets and to prevent
warehousing of orbital locations serving the United States——wfll not be undermined by grant of
this waiver request.

       Finally, Intelsat notes that it expects to operate with the RASCom—1 satellite using its
U.S. earthstation for a period of approximately 10 days. Requiring Intelsat to obtain copious
technical and legal information from an unrelated party, where there is no risk of harmful
interference and the operations will cease after approximately 10 days, would pose undue
hardship without serving underlying policy objectives. Given these part1cu1ar facts, the waiver
sought herein is plainly appropriate.




647 C.F.R. § 25.137(a).
? See 47 C.F.R. § 25.137(d)(4).
8 Mauritius is a WTO—member country.



Document Created: 2007-11-21 08:53:42
Document Modified: 2007-11-21 08:53:42

© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC