Attachment DA 99-510

DA 99-510

ORDER

DA 99-510

1999-03-15

This document pretains to SCL-LPN-19990129-00001 for Landing Points Notification on a Submarine Cable Landing filing.

IBFS_SCLLPN1999012900001_643686

1999 WL 144097 (F.C.C.), 14 F.C.C.R. 3989, 14 FCC Rcd. 3989
(Cite as: 1999 WL 144097 (F.C.C.), 14 FCC Rcd. 3989)




                           Federal Communications Commission (F.C.C.)

                                          Cable Landing License

                               *1 IN THE MATTER OF PAC LANDING CORP.

   Application for a license to land and operate in the United States a private
  fiber optic submarine cable system extending among the United States mainland,
               Mexico, Panama, Venezuela and the U.S. Virgin Islands.
              File Nos. SCL-LIC-19981103-00022 SCL-LPN-19990129-00001

                                               DA 99-510
                                        Adopted: March 15, 1999
                                        Released: March 18, 1999

**3989 By the Chief, Telecommunications Division:

                                              I. Introduction

  1. In this Order, we grant the application of PAC Landing Corp. under the Cable
Landing License Act [FN1] for authority to land and operate a private fiber optic
submarine cable system to be called "Pan American Crossing" or "PAC," extending
among the U.S. mainland, Mexico, Panama, Venezuela and the U.S. Virgin Islands.
This system will be operated on a non-common carrier basis. We find that PAC Land-
ing Corp. has provided sufficient information under our rules to comply with the
Cable Landing License Act and that it would serve the public interest to grant the
cable landing license subject to the conditions listed below.

                                              II. Application

  2. PAC Landing Corp., a Delaware corporation, is an indirect wholly owned subsi-
diary of Pan American Crossing Ltd., a Bermuda company, which, through a series of
intermediate holding companies, is an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Global
Crossing Ltd., a Bermuda company which is majority owned by U.S. interests. PAC
Landing Corp. will own the Grover Beach and St. Croix cable station terminal
equipment, and the U.S. territory portions of PAC from the landing stations to
one-half mile beyond the U.S. territorial limit.

  3. The proposed PAC system will connect: (1) Grover Beach, California; (2)
Tijuana, Mexico; (3) Mazatlan, Mexico; (4) Fort Amador, Panama; (5) Ambush Range,
Panama; (6) Puerto Viejo, Venezuela; and (7) St. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands. PAC
will be a state-of-the-art, optically amplified fiber system, initially consisting
of two operational optical fiber pairs in each of the undersea segments and a




                    © 2008 Thomson/West. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works.


1999 WL 144097 (F.C.C.), 14 F.C.C.R. 3989, 14 FCC Rcd. 3989
(Cite as: 1999 WL 144097 (F.C.C.), 14 FCC Rcd. 3989)




single operational fiber pair in each of the two diverse terrestrial segments
between **3990 Fort Amador and Ambush Range. [FN2] The system will employ a self-
healing, collapsed ring architecture, with wavelength division multiplexing. The
wet plant design will initially support 10 gigabits per second (Gbps) of capacity
on each fiber pair between terminal stations for service. Given the system's col-
lapsed ring configuration, transmission capacity will be 20 Gbps, upgradable to a
minimum of 40 Gbps using dense wavelength division multiplexing. The Minimum Capa-
city Unit (MCU) will be an STM-1 (155 Mbps). Additionally, capacity may be made
available for sale at the DS-3 level (45 Mbps). The system will be capable of sup-
porting 128 STM-1 MCUs.

  4. As shown in Exhibit A of the application that is attached to this order, PAC
will consist of nine segments: Segment 1 will include the whole of the submarine
cable system between and including System Interface at the cable station at Grover
Beach, California and Branching Unit 1. Segment 2 will include the whole of the
submarine cable system between and including the Branching Unit 1 and the System
Interface at the cable station in Tijuana, Mexico. Segment 3 will include the
whole of the submarine cable system between and including Branching Unit 1 and
Branching Unit 2. Segment 4 will include the whole of the submarine cable system
between and including Branching Unit 2 and the System Interface at the cable sta-
tion in Mazatlan, Mexico. Segment 5 will include the whole of the submarine cable
system provided between and including Branching Unit 2 and the System Interface at
the cable station in Fort Amador, Panama, as well a Branching Unit 3, which will
allow for a potential additional landing or interconnection. Segments 6A and 6B
will include the whole of the submarine cable system between and including the
System Interface at the cable station in Fort Amador, Panama and the cable station
in Ambush Range, Panama. Segment 7 will include the whole of the submarine cable
system provided between and including the cable station in Ambush Ridge, Panama
and Branching Unit 4. Segment 8 will include the whole of the submarine cable sys-
tem between and including Branching Unit 4 and the System Interface at the cable
station in Puerto Viejo, Venezuela. Segment 9 will include the whole of the sub-
marine cable system provided between and including Branching Unit 4 and the System
Interface at the cable station in St. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands. [FN3] Operation
of the PAC system is anticipated to begin in February, 2000.

                                               III. Comments

  *2 5. The application was placed on public notice on November 13, 1998. Tyco
Submarine Systems Ltd. (Tyco) filed comments in support of the application. We re-
ceived no other comments. Pursuant to Section 1.767(b) of the Commission's rules,
[FN4] the Cable Landing License Act, and Executive Order No. 10530, we informed
the Department of State of the application. [FN5] The Department **3991 of State,
after coordinating with the National Telecommunications and Information Adminis-
tration and the Department of Defense, stated that it has no objection to issuance
of the cable landing license. [FN6]




                    © 2008 Thomson/West. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works.


1999 WL 144097 (F.C.C.), 14 F.C.C.R. 3989, 14 FCC Rcd. 3989
(Cite as: 1999 WL 144097 (F.C.C.), 14 FCC Rcd. 3989)




                                               IV. Discussion

A. Private Submarine Cable Policy

  6. PAC Landing Corp. proposes to operate PAC as a non-common carrier system in
which capacity will not be offered indifferently to the user public. PAC Landing
Corp. requests a license under the Commission's private submarine cable policy,
which is intended to promote competition in the provision of international trans-
mission facilities. [FN7] Pursuant to this policy, the Commission has authorized
non-common carrier cables where: (1) there is no legal compulsion to serve the
public indifferently; and (2) there are no reasons implicit in the nature of the
operations to expect that the applicant would make capacity available to the pub-
lic indifferently and indiscriminately. [FN8]

  7. In applying the first prong of the test to submarine cable authorizations,
the Commission has stated that there will be no legal compulsion to serve the pub-
lic indifferently where there is no public interest reason to require facilities
to be offered on a common carrier basis. This public interest analysis has gener-
ally focused on whether an applicant will be able to exercise market power because
of the lack of alternative facilities. Where there are sufficient alternatives,
the Commission has found that the licensee will lack market power and will not be
able to charge monopoly rates for cable capacity. The Commission has found that,
in those circumstances, the public interest would be served by allowing a submar-
ine cable to be offered on a non-common carrier basis. [FN9]

  8. No one has suggested that the public interest requires PAC to be operated on
a common carrier basis. PAC is not affiliated with any foreign carriers on the
foreign ends of the cable system and therefore does not control any bottleneck fa-
cilities in the markets PAC proposes to serve. No commenter has disputed this
fact, and we find that, in light of all the circumstances, it would not serve the
public interest to impose common carrier regulation on the operations of PAC at
this time. We note, however, that we retain the authority to impose common carrier
or common-carrier-like obligations on the operations of this or any other submar-
ine cable system if the public interest so **3992 requires. [FN10] Furthermore, we
have always maintained the authority to classify facilities as common carrier fa-
cilities subject to Title II of the Communications Act if the public interest re-
quires that the facilities be offered to the public indifferently. [FN11]

  *3 9. Regarding the second prong of the test, we conclude that there is no reas-
on to expect that capacity in the proposed cable system would be held out to the
public indifferently. PAC Landing Corp. states that capacity will not be sold in-
differently to the user public. Instead, capacity will be assigned pursuant to in-
dividualized decisions, and bulk capacity will be offered to a specific class of
eligible users. Users of bulk capacity will be able to obtain capacity on the sys-
tem on the basis of indefeasible rights of user (IRUs). We therefore conclude that
PAC Landing Corp. will operate PAC on a non-common carrier basis.




                    © 2008 Thomson/West. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works.


1999 WL 144097 (F.C.C.), 14 F.C.C.R. 3989, 14 FCC Rcd. 3989
(Cite as: 1999 WL 144097 (F.C.C.), 14 FCC Rcd. 3989)




  10. We conclude that PAC Landing Corp. will not offer capacity in PAC to the
public on a common carrier basis and that the public interest does not require
that they do so. Accordingly, we conclude that it is appropriate to license PAC on
a non-common carrier basis. We also find that the applicant will not provide a
telecommunications service for a fee to such class of users as to be "effectively
available directly to the public" and thus will not be "telecommunications carri-
ers" under the 1996 Act. [FN12]

B. Ownership and Landing Points

  11. PAC Landing Corp. has provided the ownership information required by Section
63.18(e)(6), 1.767(a)(6), and Section 63.18(h) of the Commission's rules. PAC
Landing Corp. is ultimately controlled by Global Crossing Ltd.. PAC Landing Corp.
will lease space in the building that houses the Grover Beach cable station, and
will lease or own the building that houses the St. Croix cable station. PAC Land-
ing Corp. will own the Grover Beach and St. Croix cable station terminal equip-
ment, and the U.S. territory portions of PAC from the landing stations to the
points that are one-half mile beyond the U.S. territorial limit. Wholly owned sub-
sidiaries of Pan American Crossing Ltd. will own or lease space in the Panama and
Venezuela landing stations and will own the Panama and Venezuela cable station
terminal equipment, and the Panama and Venezuela territory portions of PAC from
the landing stations to the points that are one-half mile beyond the Panama and
Venezuela territorial limits. A Mexican entity, owned 49 percent by Pan American
Crossing Ltd., will lease space in the Mexican landing stations and will own all
Mexican territory PAC assets that it is required to own under the terms of its li-
cense. The buildings which will house the Mexican landing stations and the remain-
ing Mexican-territory portions of PAC not owned by the Mexican licensee will be
owned by a wholly owned subsidiary of Pan American Crossing Ltd. Pan American
Crossing Ltd. will own, directly or indirectly, the remaining portions of PAC.

  **3993 12. The applicant states that during the pendency of the application, it
will become affiliated within the meaning of Section 63.18(h) (1)(A) of the Com-
mission's rules with a Japanese foreign carrier, Global Access Ltd., through Glob-
al Crossing Ltd.'s proposed minority investment in Global Access Ltd. Global Ac-
cess Ltd. is a start-up venture that was recently granted a Japanese Type-1 Tele-
communications License. Because the proposed cable does not land in Japan we find
that this affiliation does not affect grant of the Cable Landing License.

  *4 13. PAC Landing Corp. has complied with Section 1.767(a)(5) of the Commis-
sion's rules by providing specific information on the cable landing locations:
Grover Beach, California; Tijuana, Mexico; Mazatlan, Mexico; Fort Amador, Panama;
Ambush Range, Panama; Puerto Viejo, Venezuela; and St. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands.
[FN13] This license is therefore not subject to any further public notice or Com-
mission approval of the cable system's landing points pursuant to the procedure in
Section 1.767(a)(5) of the Commission's rules.




                    © 2008 Thomson/West. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works.


1999 WL 144097 (F.C.C.), 14 F.C.C.R. 3989, 14 FCC Rcd. 3989
(Cite as: 1999 WL 144097 (F.C.C.), 14 FCC Rcd. 3989)




C. Environmental Impact

  14. Based on the information provided by the applicant and pursuant to the Com-
mission's procedures implementing the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969,
[FN14] we find that action on the present application would not significantly af-
fect the environment according to Section 1.1307(a) or (b) of the Commission's
rules. Therefore, pursuant to Section 1.1306 of the Commission's rules, we con-
clude that grant of the requested license would not significantly affect the en-
vironment. Consequently, PAC Landing Corp. is not required to submit an environ-
mental assessment, and this application is categorically excluded from environ-
mental processing.

                                               V. Conclusion

  15. We grant PAC Landing Corp.'s application for authority to land and operate a
non-common carrier fiber optic submarine cable extending among the United States
mainland, Mexico, Panama, Venezuela and the U.S. Virgin Islands, subject to the
conditions listed below.

                                          VI. Ordering Clauses

  16. Consistent with the foregoing and pursuant to the Cable Landing License Act
and Executive Order 10530, we hereby GRANT AND ISSUE PAC Landing Corp. a license
to land and operate a non-common carrier fiber optic cable system (consisting of
two optical fiber pairs, with 20 Gbps capacity upon completion, and upgradeable to
40 Gbps) extending among the United States mainland, Mexico, Panama, Venezuela and
the U.S. Virgin Islands. This grant is subject to all rules and regulations of the
Federal Communications Commission (Commission); any treaties or conventions relat-
ing to communications to which the United States is or may hereafter become a
party; any action by the Commission or the Congress of the United States rescind-
ing, changing, modifying, or amending any rights accruing to any person hereunder;
and the following conditions:
    **3994 (1) The location of the cable system within the territorial waters of
the United States, its territories and possessions, and upon its shore shall be in
conformity with plans approved by the Secretary of the Army, and the cable shall
be moved or shifted by the Licensee at its expense upon the request of the Secret-
ary of the Army whenever he or she considers such course necessary in the public
interest, for reasons of national defense, or for the maintenance or improvement
of harbors for navigational purposes;
    (2) The Licensee shall at all times comply with any requirements of U.S. gov-
ernment authorities regarding the location and concealment of the cable facilit-
ies, buildings, and apparatus for the purpose of protecting and safeguarding the
cable from injury or destruction by enemies of the United States;
    *5 (3) The Licensee or any persons or companies controlling it, controlled by
it, or under direct or indirect common control with it do not enjoy and shall not
acquire any right to handle traffic on a common carrier basis to or from the




                    © 2008 Thomson/West. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works.


1999 WL 144097 (F.C.C.), 14 F.C.C.R. 3989, 14 FCC Rcd. 3989
(Cite as: 1999 WL 144097 (F.C.C.), 14 FCC Rcd. 3989)




United States, its territories, or its possessions unless such service be author-
ized by the Commission pursuant to Section 214 of the Communications Act, as
amended;
    (4) The Licensee or any persons or companies controlling it, controlled by it,
or under direct or indirect common control with it shall not acquire or enjoy any
right for the purpose of handling or interchanging traffic to or from the United
States, its territories, or its possessions to land, connect, or operate cables or
land lines, to construct or operate radio stations, or to interchange traffic,
that is denied to any other United States company by reason of any concession,
contract, understanding, or working arrangement to which the Licensee or any per-
sons controlling it, controlled by it, or under direct or indirect common control
with it are parties;
    (5) Neither this license nor the rights granted herein shall be transferred,
assigned, or in any manner either voluntarily or involuntarily disposed of or dis-
posed of indirectly by transfer of control of the Licensee to any persons, unless
the Commission shall give prior consent in writing;
    (6) Pursuant to Section 2 of the Cable Landing License Act, 47 U.S.C. § 35;
Executive Order No. 10530, as amended; and Section 214 of the Communications Act
of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 214, the Commission reserves the right to impose
additional common carrier or common-carrier-like regulation on the operations of
the cable system if it finds that the public interest so requires;
    (7) The Commission reserves the right to require the Licensee to file an en-
vironmental assessment or environmental impact statement should it determine that
the landing of the cable at those locations and construction of necessary cable
landing stations would significantly affect the environment within the meaning of
Section 1.1307 of the Commission's procedures implementing the National Environ-
mental Policy Act of 1969; this license is subject to modification by the Commis-
sion upon its review of any environmental assessment or environmental impact
statement that it may require pursuant to its rules;
    **3995 (8) The Licensees shall maintain de jure and de facto control of the
U.S. portion of the cable system, including the cable landing stations in the
United States, sufficient to comply with the requirements of this license;
    (9) This license is revocable by the Commission after due notice and opportun-
ity for hearing pursuant to Section 2 of the Cable Landing License Act, 47 U.S.C.
§ 35, or for failure to comply with the terms of the authorizations;
    *6 (10) The Licensee shall notify the Commission in writing of the date on
which the cable is placed in service, and this license shall expire 25 years from
such date, unless renewed or extended upon proper application, and, upon expira-
tion of this license, all rights granted under it shall be terminated; and
    (11) The terms and conditions upon which this license is given shall be accep-
ted by the Licensee by filing a letter with the Secretary, Federal Communications
Commission, Washington, D.C. 20554, within 30 days of the release of the cable
landing license.

  17. This Order is issued under Section 0.261 of the Commission's rules, 47




                    © 2008 Thomson/West. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works.


1999 WL 144097 (F.C.C.), 14 F.C.C.R. 3989, 14 FCC Rcd. 3989
(Cite as: 1999 WL 144097 (F.C.C.), 14 FCC Rcd. 3989)




C.F.R. § 0.261, and is effective upon adoption. Petitions for reconsideration un-
der Section 1.106 or applications for review under Section 1.115 of the Commis-
sion's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.106, 1.115, may be filed within 30 days of the date
of public notice of this order (see 47 C.F.R. § 1.4(b)(2)).

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

Rebecca Arbogast

Chief

Telecommunications Division

International Bureau

FN1. An Act Relating to the Landing and Operation of Submarine Cables in the
United States, 47 U.S.C. §§ 34-39 (1994) (Cable Landing License Act).

FN2. Certain undersea segments, and the terrestrial segments between Fort Amador
and Ambush Range, will also contain an additional fiber pair, which initially will
be dark.

FN3. The System Interface is defined as a multiple of a Synchronous Transport Mod-
ule 1 (STM-1) digital input/output port on the digital distribution frame
(excluding the digital distribution frame itself).

FN4. 47 C.F.R. § 1.767(b) (1997).

FN5. Letter from Diane J. Cornell, Chief, Telecommunications Division, Interna-
tional Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, to Steven W. Lett, Deputy U.S.
Coordinator, Office of International Communications and Information Policy, U.S.
Department of State (Nov. 20, 1998).

FN6. Letter from Amb. Vonya B. McCann, United States Coordinator, International
Communications and Information Policy, U.S. Department of State, to Regina M.
Keeney, Chief, International Bureau, FCC (Feb. 5, 1999).

FN7. See Tel-Optik, Ltd., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 100 F.C.C.2d 1033,
1040-42, 1046-48 (1985); see also Cable & Wireless, plc, Cable Landing License, 12
FCC Rcd 8516 (1997).

FN8. See Cable & Wireless, 12 FCC Rcd at 8522; see also Optel Communications,
Inc., Conditional Cable Landing License, 8 FCC Rcd 2267 (1993); National Associ-
ation of Regulatory Utility Commissioners v. FCC, 525 F.2d 630, 642 (D.C. Cir.)
(NARUC I), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 992 (1976).

FN9. See, e.g., Cable & Wireless, 12 FCC Rcd at 8523.

FN10. See 47 U.S.C. § 35 (providing that a license may be granted "upon such terms




                    © 2008 Thomson/West. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works.


1999 WL 144097 (F.C.C.), 14 F.C.C.R. 3989, 14 FCC Rcd. 3989
(Cite as: 1999 WL 144097 (F.C.C.), 14 FCC Rcd. 3989)




as shall be necessary to assure just and reasonable rates and service in the oper-
ation and use of cables so licensed").

FN11. See, e.g., Cable & Wireless, 12 FCC Rcd at 8531; AT&T Corp. et al., Cable
Landing License, DA 98-1711, File No. SCL-AMD-19980902-00018, ¶ 15 (rel. Dec. 15,
1998).

FN12. See 47 U.S.C. § 153(44) (defining "telecommunications carrier");      Cable &
Wireless, 12 FCC Rcd at 8523.

FN13. Letter from Sherri L. Cook, Vice President, PAC Landing Corp. to Magalie Ro-
man Salas, Secretary, FCC (Jan. 29, 1999).

FN14. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1301-.1319 (1997).

                                             **3996 Exhibit A

                                      Pan American Crossing - PAC

TABULAR OR GRAPHIC MATERIAL SET FORTH AT THIS POINT IS NOT DISPLAYABLE

 1999 WL 144097 (F.C.C.), 14 F.C.C.R. 3989, 14 FCC Rcd. 3989

END OF DOCUMENT




                    © 2008 Thomson/West. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works.



Document Created: 2008-05-22 17:31:31
Document Modified: 2008-05-22 17:31:31

© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC