2014-09-02 DISH Oper

PETITION submitted by DISH Operating LLC

DISH Operating Petition

2014-09-02

This document pretains to SAT-MOD-20140624-00075 for Modification on a Satellite Space Stations filing.

IBFS_SATMOD2014062400075_1059868

                                         Before the
                          FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
                                   Washington, D.C. 20554


In the Matter of                             )
                                             )
DIRECTV Enterprises, LLC                     )         File Nos. SAT-MOD-20140612-00066 &
                                             )         SAT-MOD-20140624-00075
Applications for Modification of the         )         Call Sign S2712
RB-2 Satellite License                       )

To: International Bureau

                 PETITION TO CONDITION OF DISH OPERATING L.L.C.

         Pursuant to Section 25.154 of the Commission’s rules,1 DISH Operating L.L.C. (“DISH”)

hereby files this petition to request that the Commission impose a coordination condition if the

FCC believes that grant of the above-referenced Applications of DIRECTV Enterprises, LLC

(“DIRECTV”) is otherwise in the public interest.2 Specifically, DISH asks that the FCC

condition any positive action on the Applications on a requirement that DIRECTV complete

coordination with Ciel Satellite Limited Partnership (“Ciel”) and modify its RB-2 operational

parameters to reflect that coordination, all before commencing operations in the 17/24 GHz

Broadcasting-Satellite Service (“BSS”) band.

         The DIRECTV RB-2 satellite is licensed to operate in the 17/24 GHz BSS at the nominal

103° W.L. orbital location.3 In the Applications, DIRECTV proposes increased power and other


1
    47 C.F.R. § 25.154.
2
  DIRECTV seeks to modify the operational parameters for the RB-2 satellite, IBFS File No.
SAT-MOD-20140612-00066 (filed Jun. 12, 2014) (“Payload Modification”), and to extend the
launch and operations milestone for the satellite, IBFS File No. SAT-MOD-20140624-00075
(filed Jun. 24, 2014) (“Extension Request,” and with the Payload Modification, the
“Applications”).
3
 See DIRECTV Enterprises, LLC Application for Authorization to Launch and Operate
DIRECTV RB-2, a Satellite in the 17/24 GHz Broadcasting Satellite Service at the 102.825° W.L.



                                                 -1-


changed technical parameters for the satellite4 and requests that the Commission either extend

the milestone date to launch and begin operations of the spacecraft to April 27, 2015, or waive

the milestone.5

           As discussed below, DISH has contractual rights to use the Canadian-licensed Ciel-6i

payload, which is in operation in the 17/24 GHz BSS band at 103° W.L. pursuant to an ITU

satellite network filing with date priority over the ITU filing that the DIRECTV RB-2 satellite

utilizes.6 In order to ensure that DISH does not suffer interference from the operation of RB-2,

DISH requests that if the Commission finds that it is otherwise in the public interest to grant the

Applications, DIRECTV should not be authorized to begin 17/24 GHz BSS operations until it

completes coordination with Ciel and modifies the RB-2 operational parameters to reflect that

coordination.

      I.      BACKGROUND

           Industry Canada has authorized Ciel, an affiliate of SES Americom, Inc. (“SES”), to

operate in the 17/24 GHz BSS frequencies at the 103° W.L. orbital location. On September 21,

2012, Industry Canada granted Ciel a license to operate a payload known as “Ciel-6i” in this

Orbital Location, Order and Authorization, 24 FCC Rcd 9393 (IB 2009) (“DIRECTV S2712
Grant”).
4
    See Payload Modification, Narrative at 4-11 and Appendix A.
5
    See Extension Request, Exhibit A.
6
  SES Americom, Inc., Application for Authority to Operate the SES-3 Satellite at the 103° W.L.,
29 FCC Rcd 3678, 3681 ¶ 8 (IB 2014) (“The Canadian ITU filing for the 17/24 GHz BSS
operations at the 103° W.L. orbital location predates the U.S. filing.”); see also id. at 3681 n.24
(“The Canadian CANBSS-19 filing was filed on January 30, 2006 and published in Special
Section CRC 1907 with IFIC No. 2590 on March 3, 2007 prior to the date of filing of the U.S
filings. USABSN-12 was filed on February 10, 2006 and published in Special Section CRC
2009 with IFIC No. 2600 on July 23, 2007, USABSN-12A, was filed on September 24, 2008 and
published in Special Section CRC 2389 with IFIC No. 2648 on June 29, 2009; and, USABSN-
12B filing was filed on August 19, 2011 and published in Special Section CRC 3410 with IFIC
No. 2756 on October 14, 2013.”)



                                                  -2-


spectrum at 103° W.L.,7 and Ciel-6i subsequently commenced operations.8 Ciel-6i is a payload

on the SES-3 satellite, which is positioned at 103° W.L.9 The Canadian ITU filing for the

17/24 GHz BSS frequencies at the 103° W.L. orbital location, for coverage that includes all of

North America, was filed on January 30, 2006, prior to the U.S. filing for DIRECTV’s

17/24 GHz BSS satellite at this nominal location.10 The Ciel-6i filing therefore has international

date priority over the relevant DIRECTV 17/24 GHz filing.

          Hughes Network Systems Canada ULC (“HNS Canada”) has a contract with Ciel to use

the 17/24 GHz BSS capacity on Ciel-6i and has, in turn, leased this capacity to DISH. DISH

plans to use the 17/24 GHz capacity for the provision of video services that may play a role in

the terrestrial wireless broadband network planned by DISH’s affiliate, DISH Network

Corporation, and its subsidiaries.11 Based on the results of these efforts, DISH hopes to be able

to identify and address any technical or other deployment issues with the service discovered over

the course of operations.

          In September of 2006, DIRECTV filed for Commission authority to launch and operate a

space station in the 17/24 GHz BSS at the nominal 103° W.L. orbital location, and that


7
 Industry Canada Radio License, Account No. 07-150006068, effective Sept. 21, 2012; Letter of
Suzanne Lambert, Director, Space Services Operations, Industry Canada, to Bernie Haughian,
Managing Director, Ciel Satellite Limited Partnership, Sept. 21, 2012 (approving Ciel’s plan to
use an interim 17/24 GHz BSS satellite at 103° W.L.). The 17/24 GHz BSS payload is
designated Ciel-6i. See IBFS File Nos. SAT-RPL-20121228-00227 and SAT-AMD-20131113-
00132, Opposition of SES Americom, Inc. at 5 (filed Dec. 14, 2013).
8
 The Ciel-6i payload is capable of operating anywhere within the 24.75-25.25 GHz and 17.3-
17.8 GHz bands and consists of a single 500 MHz transponder.
9
 See IBFS File Nos. SAT-RPL-20121228-00227 and SAT-AMD-20131113-00132, Application
of SES Americom, Inc. at 3-5 (filed Dec. 28, 2012).
10
     See supra n.6.
11
 DISH is preparing an application for authority to operate up to 50,000 earth stations in the
United States for the purpose of receiving service from Ciel-6.



                                                -3-


application was granted in 2009.12 DIRECTV submitted the application fully aware that it did

not have international priority under relevant ITU rules.13 Moreover, “[i]t is longstanding

Commission policy that grant of an authorization to construct, launch, and operate a space station

carries with it the responsibility to coordinate with other potentially affected space station

operators.”14 In comments on DIRECTV’s application, both Ciel and SES highlighted the

obligation of U.S. licensees to coordinate with higher priority ITU filings and asked the

Commission to explicitly condition any grant of DIRECTV’s application on adherence to the

ITU’s procedures.15 In accordance with longstanding Commission policy and Section 25.111(b)

of its rules, the FCC required such adherence and coordination as a condition of its grant of

DIRECTV’s application:

          No protection from interference caused by radio stations authorized by other
          Administrations is guaranteed unless coordination and notification procedures are
          timely completed or, with respect to individual Administrations, by successfully
          completing coordination agreements. Any radio station authorization for which
          coordination has not been completed may be subject to additional terms and
          conditions as required to effect coordination of the frequency assignment with
          other Administrations.16




12
     See DIRECTV S2712 Grant.
13
  See IBFS File Nos. SAT-LOA-20060908-00100, et al., Application for Authorization to
Launch and Operate DIRECTV BSS-103W, A Satellite in the 17/24 GHz Broadcasting Satellite
Service at 21 (filed Sept. 8, 2006).
14
  Establishment of Policies and Services Rule for the Broadcasting-Satellite Service at the 17.3-
17.7 GHz Frequency Band and at the 17.7-17.8 GHz Frequency Band Internationally, and at the
24.75-25.25 GHz Frequency Band for Fixed Satellite Services Providing Feeder Links to the
Broadcasting-Satellite Service and for the Satellite Services Operating Bi-directionally in the
17.3-17.8 GHz Frequency Band, Second Order on Reconsideration, 25 FCC Rcd 15718, 15720,
¶ 9 (2010).
15
     See DIRECTV S2712 Grant, 24 FCC Rcd at 9394-95, ¶ 4.
16
     Id. at 9407, ¶ 41 (emphasis added).



                                                 -4-


           Accordingly, under international rules, the FCC regulations, and its own license

condition, DIRECTV must coordinate with Ciel. To date, no such coordination agreement has

been concluded.

     II.      THE FCC SHOULD NOT AUTHORIZE DIRECTV TO BEGIN 17/24 GHz
              BSS OPERATIONS UNTIL DIRECTV COMPLETES COORDINATION
              WITH CIEL

           As discussed above, DISH has contracted to use 17/24 GHz BSS frequencies at

103° W.L. on Ciel-6i. As part of its decision to utilize this spectrum, DISH relied on the fact that

the Ciel-6i payload holds the highest priority at the ITU and is able to utilize the full complement

of licensed spectrum in the 17/24 GHz BSS band over North America. This reliance was based

on Ciel’s rights under ITU procedures and on the FCC’s explicit licensing condition requiring

DIRECTV to operate RB-2 in a manner consistent with FCC rules and practices, as well as with

applicable ITU policies.

           DISH understands that DIRECTV has not entered into a coordination agreement with

Ciel despite Ciel’s repeated efforts. In fact, although Ciel has been attempting to move the

discussions forward, DIRECTV has refused to progress this issue except on its terms.

DIRECTV should not be rewarded for disregarding its explicit obligation to coordinate. The

FCC should therefore require DIRECTV to complete coordination with Ciel and submit a further

modification to the proposed RB-2 technical parameters to reflect the terms of such coordination

before it can operate in the 17/24 GHz BSS spectrum.17

17
   See Amendment of the Commission’s Regulatory Policies to Allow Non-U.S. Licensed Space
Stations to Provide Domestic and International Satellite Service in the United States, Report and
Order, 12 FCC Rcd 24,094, 24,183 ¶ 214 (1997) (“[I]t is paramount that all operators providing
satellite service in the United States comply with Commission rules and policies applicable to
that particular satellite service. In addition, we often attach specific conditions to licenses
relating to operating requirements, system implementation requirements, and technical
parameters. Entities violating the terms of their license are subject to administrative penalties,



                                                  -5-


          Such action is particularly important here as the risk of harmful interference is very real.

Yet, DIRECTV does not even attempt to demonstrate that RB-2 can operate at 102.75° W.L.

over the same frequencies and coverage area as Ciel-6i without causing harmful interference.

The attached Appendix A quantifies the adverse impact that RB-2 will have on Ciel-6i, and

shows that a 36-MHz carrier on Ciel-6i that is representative of the carrier that DISH would use

for its service would have a negative margin of 17.6 dB.

   III.      CONCLUSION

          For the reasons described above, as a condition to any grant of the referenced

Applications, the FCC should require that, prior to commencing 17/24 GHz operations,

DIRECTV enter into a coordination agreement with Ciel with respect to its 17/24 GHz

operations and seek modification of its RB-2 authority to reflect the terms of coordination.



                                                                Respectfully Submitted,



                                                         By:    /s/

                                                                Alison Minea
                                                                DISH Operating L.L.C.
                                                                1110 Vermont Ave., N.W. Suite 750
                                                                Washington, D.C. 20005

September 2, 2014




including monetary forfeitures and license revocation. We will continue our efforts to ensure
compliance by all providers, whether U.S. or foreign, and to impose sanctions when
appropriate.”)



                                                   -6-


                                     Certificate of Service

       I, Alison Minea, hereby certify that on September 2, 2014, I sent true and complete
copies of the above Petition to Condition via First Class mail to the following people:



Mr. Jack M. Wengryniuk                           William M. Wiltshire
DIRECTV Enterprises, LLC                         Harris, Wiltshire & Grannis LLP
2230 E. Imperial Hwy                             1919 M Street, N.W.
CA/LAI/N340                                      Suite 800
El Segundo, CA 90245                             Washington, DC 20036


                                                           /s/
                                                           Alison Minea




                                               -7-


                                             DECLARATION



     1, Jaime Londono, declare under penalty of perjurythat the following facts are true and correct to
     the best of my knowledge, information, and belief:

            1. I am employed as the Vice President, Advanced Programs and Spectrum
               Management, for EchoStar Satellite Operating Corporation.

            2.   1 have personal knowledge of the analysis contained in Annex A, which quantifies
                 the adverse impact that RB—2 will have on Ciel—6i, and shows that a 36—MHz carrier
                 on Ciel—6i that is representative of the carrier that DISH Operating L.L.C. would use
                 for its service would have a negative margin of 17.6 dB.



     Executed on September 2, 2014:
                      /
                      /




  ;Jai'i?g Londono
 *

ff;Jfifc/Ei@Star Satellite Operating Corporation


                                                    Appendix A

Ciel‐6i with interference from +/‐4 deg neighbors
Ciel‐6i orbital location                                         °E        ‐103.0
Ciel‐6i uplink frequency                                         GHz       25000
Ciel‐6i user data rate                                           kbps      14820
Ciel‐6i modulation                                                          QPSK
Ciel‐6i total coding rate                                                   0.247
Ciel‐6i number of carriers per txp                                            6
Ciel‐6i carrier bandwidth                                        MHz         36

Ciel‐6i   uplink EIRP                                            dBW         70.9
Ciel‐6i   TX earth station gain                                  dBi        57.4
Ciel‐6i   uplink input power / carrier                           dBW        13.5
Ciel‐6i   uplink input power density                             dBW/Hz     ‐61.3
Ciel‐6i   RX G/T satellite                                       dB/K         ‐8
Ciel‐6i   uplink carrier thermal C/N                             dB           4.4
Ciel‐6i   uplink ASI from +/‐4 neighbors                         dB         38.7
Ciel‐6i   C/(N+I) uplink                                         dB           4.4

Ciel‐6i   downlink frequency                                     MHz        17500
Ciel‐6i   downlink in EIRP / 36 MHz                              dBW         23.1
Ciel‐6i   RX earth station location                                       Vancouver
Ciel‐6i   RX earth station on‐axis gain                          dBi         59.4
Ciel‐6i   RX earth station antenna pointing error                dB           0.3
Ciel‐6i   RX earth station noise temperature                     K           150
Ciel‐6i   downlink carrier thermal C/N                           dB           5.4
Ciel‐6i   downlink ASI from +/‐4 degree neighbors                dB           7.0
Ciel‐6i   C/(N+I) downlink                                       dB           3.1

Ciel‐6i C/(N+I) overall                                                     0.7
Ciel‐6i C/(N+I) required                                         dB         ‐2.0
Ciel‐6i margin                                                   dB         2.7

RB‐2 impact into Ciel‐6i
RB‐2 orbital location                                            °E        ‐102.75
Ciel‐6i orbital location                                         °E         ‐103.0
RB‐2 uplink EIRP / 36 MHz towards Ciel‐6i                        dBW         42.8
RB‐2 peak downlink EIRP / 36 MHz                                 dBW         58.9
RB‐2 downlink EIRP towards Ciel‐6i earth station                 dBW        52.90
Ciel‐6i RX earth station antenna gain towards RB‐2               dBi         47.2

Aggregate downlink interference into Ciel‐6i with RB‐2           dB         ‐17.6
Aggregate uplink interference into Ciel‐6i with RB‐2             dB         27.7
Aggregate Inteference into Ciel‐6i with RB‐2 included            dB         ‐17.6




                                                         -9-



Document Created: 2014-09-02 16:53:27
Document Modified: 2014-09-02 16:53:27

© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC