Attachment 20170323140216-117.p

20170323140216-117.p

SUPPLEMENT

Supplement

2001-12-28

This document pretains to ITC-214-19980501-00290 for International Global Resale Authority on a International Telecommunications filing.

IBFS_ITC2141998050100290_1439382

Mmtz LEviNn                   Washington
                                                                           701 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
                                                                           Washington, D.C. 20004
Comn FERRIS
                              Boston
                                                                           202 434 7300
                              New York
GLOVSKYAND
                                                                           202 434 7400 fax
                              Reston                                       wuw.mintg.com

PopEo pc                      New Haven


                                                                           Russ Taylor


                                                                           Direct dial 202—661—8717
                                                                               1     hars is
                                                                           riaylor@miniz.com



                                                December 28, 2001

BY HAND



Magalie Roman Salas
Office of the Secretary
Federal Communications Commission
445 12th Street, S.W.
Washington, D.C. 20554

       Re:     CoreComm Limited — Pro Forma Transferor;
               CoreComm Holdco, Inc. — Pro Forma Transferee;
               Notification of Pro Forma Transfer of
               Control of International Section 214 Authorizations

Dear Ms. Salas:

        Enclosed herewith are an original and one copy of a notification ofpro forma transfer of
control, covering the International Section 214 authorizations specified at Exhibit A. 47 C.F.R.
§ 63.24(b) (2000). No FCC application processing fee is associated with this notification filing.

       If you have any questions concerning this submission, please contact me.

                                                Sincerely,

                                                0C
                                                Russ Taylor



Enclosures


                          CERTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION
                        OF PRO FORMA TRANSFER OF CONTROL

        The attached letter notifies the Federal Communications Commission ("F               _‘ or
"Commussion") of the pro forma transfer of control of the Section 214 authorization          (lders
specified at Exhibit A. (the "Licensees"). 47 C.F.R. § 1.948(d) (2000). In particular, or    riday
December 28, 2001, the Licensees‘ ultimate parent corporation CoreComm                       nited
("‘Transferor") will reorganize in a debt—restructuring transaction and convey ultimate cc   ‘ol of
the Licensees to CoreComm Holdco, Inc. ("‘Transferee") (Licensees, the Transferor            1 the
Transferee are collectively referred to herein as the "Applicant"). Transferee is a pre—e    sting
wholly—owned subsidiary of Transferor. Because the Applicant‘s recapitalization is pro j      na in
nature, the Applicant does not seek prior FCC approval, but instead notifies the FC)          of its
actions pursuant to section 63.24(b) of the FCC‘s rules."

        The transaction is based on the Applicant‘s need to restructure its finances to et   re its
continued viability as a provider of telecom services."" The Applicant‘s restructurt           is a
recapitalization that will primarily involve the conversion of debt and preferred stocl      f the
Transferor into common stock of the Transferee. The Applicant believes that the trans:       on is
pro forma in nature primarily because the Applicant‘s beneficial ownership and cont          . will
remain largely unchanged. For example, the Transferor‘s three largest sharehold                 will
constitute three of the four largest shareholders of the Transferee. The Transferor‘s        irgest
shareholder, Michael Karp, currently holds approximately 3%ofthe Transferor‘s votit          stock
and will hold approximately 34% of the Transferee‘s voting stock, an amount that rema          non—
controlling."" Further, the Transferor‘s two remaining largest shareholders, Thomas Grax      a and
Debra Buruchian, will increase their stakes from approximately 9% of Transferor‘s voti        stock
to approximately 11% of Transferee‘s voting stock."" Finally, the one holder of greater t        10%
of the Transferee‘s voting stock that was not a holder of greater than 10% of Transferor‘      oting


&      47 C.F.R. § 63.24(b) (2000).
2/      The Transferor is publicly—traded (NASDAQ: COMM), and submitted a curren             sport,
Form 8—K, to the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 18, 2001, descri             g the
transaction in greaterfinancial detail.

*       The increase in Karp‘s percentage of ownership is actually more modest than it appears.
Karp is a current debt—holder of the Transferor and receives common stock on a biannual basis in
lieu of interest payments. As recently as October 1, 2001, for example, Karp held approximately
21% of the Transferor‘s voting stock, but has reduced his percentage of ownership through stock
sales. Thus, depending on the value of the Transferor‘s share price, and Karp‘s voluntary stock
sales, his holdings in the Transferor can fluctuate greatly between 5—20%, but have always
remained non—controlling.

4      Prior to the transaction, no other entities held more than ten percent (10%) of the voting
stock of the Transferor. Further, the Applicant is not aware of any privity between its largest
shareholders; each is believed to act according to their individual interests.


stock will be Booth American, which will hold a non—controlling 20% interest. In any case,
Booth American is a current debt—holder and preferred shareholder in the Transferor. Thus, there
will be no new party obtaining a controlling voting interest in the Applicant.

        In addition to the foregoing, there are no planned changes in the Applicant‘s management
or board that would convey de facto or de jure control to a new party whose qualifications have
not already been passed on by the Commission. Further, the services provided to the Applicant‘s
customers will not change as a result of the recapitalization. Thus, because the Applicant will
remain under the control of its larger shareholders and management, the Applicant‘s transaction
should be considered to result in only a pro forma transfer of control."

         The current recapitalization, together with all previous pro forma transactions, does not
result in a change of the Applicant‘s ultimate control. I hereby certify that the above—stated facts
are, to the best of my knowledge, true and correct. 47 C.F.R. § 1.16 (2000).

                                              Respectfully submitted,

                                              CORECOMM LIMITED
                                              CORECOMM HOLDCO, INC.


                                         By: M{‘/ Céng—\——
                                              Richard Lubasch
                                              Senior Vice President & General Counsel




5      See Metromedia Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 98 FCC 2d 300, 306 (1984).


                                 Exhibit A


      214 Authorization Holder               FCC File No.



ATX Licensing, Inc.               ITC—T/C—20000620—00364
CoreComm Newco, Inc.              ITC—ASG—19990402—00215
CoreComm Newco, Inc.              ITC—ASG—19990402—00238
CoreComm Newco, Inc.              ITC—214—19980501—00290
CoreComm Incorporated             ITC—97—021(TC)
Corecomm Newco, Inc.              ITC—T/C—19980806—00542



Document Created: 2019-05-31 14:40:14
Document Modified: 2019-05-31 14:40:14

© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC