Test Report Rev 3

FCC ID: XPB-LE

Test Report

Download: PDF

FCCID_3238512

Date: November 18, 2016 Prepared For: Schlage Lock Company / Allegion Report No.: 20161114-RPTALEG10009Ar2

Revision History

Rev. No. Date Details Revised By

r0 November 18, 2016 Initial Release. J. Brunett
r1 December 10, 2016 Corrections per Reviewer Comments J. Brunett
r2 December 22, 2016 Corrections per Reviewer Comments J. Brunett

Contents
Revision History 2

Table of Contents 2

1 Test Report Scope and Limitations 4
1.1 Laboratory Authorization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
1.2 Report Retention . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
1.3 Subcontracted Testing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
1.4 Limitation of Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
1.5 Copyright . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
1.6 Endorsements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
1.7 Test Location . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
1.8 Traceability and Equipment Used . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5

2 Test Specifications and Procedures 6
2.1 Test Specification and General Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6

3 Configuration and Identification of the Equipment Under Test 7
3.1 Description and Declarations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
3.1.1 EUT Configuration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
3.1.2 Modes of Operation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
3.1.3 Variants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
3.1.4 Test Samples . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
3.1.5 Functional Exerciser . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
3.1.6 Modifications Made . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
3.1.7 Production Intent . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
3.1.8 Declared Exemptions and Additional Product Notes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8

4 Emissions 9
4.1 General Test Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
4.1.1 Radiated Test Setup and Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
4.1.2 Conducted Emissions Test Setup and Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
4.1.3 Power Supply Variation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
4.1.4 Thermal Variation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
4.2 Intentional Emissions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
4.2.1 Fundamental Emission Pulsed Operation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
4.2.2 Fundamental Emission Bandwidth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
4.2.3 Fundamental Emission . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
4.3 Unintentional Emissions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
4.3.1 Transmit Chain Spurious Emissions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
4.3.2 Radiated Digital Spurious . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19

5 Measurement Uncertainty 20

Willow Run Test Labs, LLC, 7117 Fieldcrest Dr., Brighton, Michigan 48116 USA Page 2 of 20

Date: November 18, 2016 Prepared For: Schlage Lock Company / Allegion Report No.: 20161114-RPTALEG10009Ar2

List of Tables
1 Test Site List. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
2 Equipment List. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
3 EUT Declarations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
4 Pulsed Emission Characteristics (Duty Cycle). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
5 Intentional Emission Bandwidth. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
6 Fundamental Radiated Emissions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
7 Transmit Chain Spurious Emissions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
7 Transmit Chain Spurious Emissions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
8 Radiated Digital Spurious Emissions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
9 Measurement Uncertainty. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20

List of Figures
1 Photos of EUT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
2 EUT Test Configuration Diagram. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
3 Radiated Emissions Diagram of the EUT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
4 Radiated Emissions Test Setup Photograph(s). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
5 Pulsed Emission Characteristics (Duty Cycle). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
6 Intentional Emission Bandwidth. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15

Willow Run Test Labs, LLC, 7117 Fieldcrest Dr., Brighton, Michigan 48116 USA Page 3 of 20

Date: November 18, 2016 Prepared For: Schlage Lock Company / Allegion Report No.: 20161114-RPTALEG10009Ar2

1 Test Report Scope and Limitations
1.1 Laboratory Authorization
Test Facility description and attenuation characteristics are on file with the FCC Laboratory, Columbia, Maryland
(FCC Reg. No: 688478) and with ISED Canada, Ottawa, ON (File Ref. No: IC8719A-1 and IC22227-1).

1.2 Report Retention
For equipment verified to comply with the regulations herein, the manufacturer is obliged to retain this report with
the product records for the life of the product, and no less than ten years. A copy of this Report will remain on file
with this laboratory until November 2026.

1.3 Subcontracted Testing
This report does not contain data produced under subcontract.

1.4 Limitation of Results
The test results contained in this report relate only to the item(s) tested. Any electrical or mechanical modification
made to the test item subsequent to the test date shall invalidate the data presented in this report. Any electrical
or mechanical modification made to the test item subsequent to this test date shall require reevaluation.

1.5 Copyright
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of Willow Run Test Labs, LLC.

1.6 Endorsements
This report shall not be used to claim product endorsement by any accrediting, regulatory, or governmental agency.

Willow Run Test Labs, LLC, 7117 Fieldcrest Dr., Brighton, Michigan 48116 USA Page 4 of 20

Date: November 18, 2016 Prepared For: Schlage Lock Company / Allegion Report No.: 20161114-RPTALEG10009Ar2

EUT
Schlage Lock Company / Allegion
Model(s): LE-ADD, LE-GRW
FCC ID: XPB-LE
IC: 8053B-LE

Figure 2: EUT Test Configuration Diagram.

3.1.4 Test Samples
Two samples of the EUT were provided for emissions testing. Both samples are electrically identical, but employ
different escutcheon faceplates. Both samples were tested.

3.1.5 Functional Exerciser
Normal operating EUT functionality was verified by observation of transmitted signal.

3.1.6 Modifications Made
There were no modifications made to the EUT by this laboratory.

3.1.7 Production Intent
The EUT appears to be a production ready sample.

3.1.8 Declared Exemptions and Additional Product Notes
This EUT also employs a pre-approved Bluetooth (BLE) module and a pre-approved WiLAN module which can
be used to monitor locking and unlocking of the mechanical door lock. The LF card reader component and digital
spurious emissions from this EUT (when fully operational) are evaluated in this report.

Willow Run Test Labs, LLC, 7117 Fieldcrest Dr., Brighton, Michigan 48116 USA Page 8 of 20

Date: November 18, 2016 Prepared For: Schlage Lock Company / Allegion Report No.: 20161114-RPTALEG10009Ar2

4 Emissions
4.1 General Test Procedures
4.1.1 Radiated Test Setup and Procedures
Radiated electromagnetic emissions from the EUT are first pre-scanned in our shielded anechoic chamber or GTEM
test cell. Spectrum and modulation characteristics of all emissions are recorded. Instrumentation, including spectrum
analyzers and other test equipment as detailed in Section 1.7 are employed. After pre-scan, emission measurements
are made on the test site of record. If the EUT connects to auxiliary equipment and is table or floor standing, the
configurations prescribed in relevant test standards are followed. Alternatively, a layout closest to normal use (as
declared by the provider) is employed if the resulting emissions appear to be worst-case in such a configuration. See
Figure 3. All intentionally radiating elements that are not fixed-mounted in use are placed on the test table lying
flat, on their side, and on their end (3-axes) and the resulting worst case emissions are recorded. If the EUT is
fixed-mounted in use, measurements are made with the device oriented in the manner consistent with installation
and then emissions are recorded.

Long Interface Cables
EUT Power Long Interface Cables
(to AUX) AUX Power
(to EUT)

Equipment Under Test Auxiliary
(EUT)
Short Interface Cables Equipment
(AUX)

Radiated Emissions Table

Figure 3: Radiated Emissions Diagram of the EUT.

If the EUT exhibits spurious emissions due to internal receiver circuitry, such emissions are measured with an
appropriate carrier signal applied. For devices with intentional emissions below 30 MHz, a shielded loop antenna is
used. It is placed at a 1 meter receive height. Emissions between 30 MHz and 1 GHz are measured using tuned dipoles
and/or calibrated broadband antennas. For both horizontal and vertical polarizations, the test antenna is raised and
lowered from 1 to 4 m in height until a maximum emission level is detected. The EUT is then rotated through 360o
in azimuth until the highest emission is detected. The test antenna is then raised and lowered one last time from
1 to 4 m and the worst case value is recorded. Emissions above 1 GHz are characterized using standard gain horn
or broadband ridge-horn antennas on our OATS with a 4 × 5 m rectangle of H-4 absorber placed over the ground
screen covering the OATS ground screen. Care is taken to ensure that test receiver resolution and video bandwidths
meet the regulatory requirements, and that the emission bandwidth of the EUT is not reduced. Photographs of the
test setup employed are depicted in Figure 4.
Where regulations allow for direct measurement of field strength, power values (dBm) measured on the test
receiver / analyzer are converted to dBµV/m at the regulatory distance, using
Edist = 107 + PR + KA − KG + KE − CF
where PR is the power recorded on spectrum analyzer, in dBm, KA is the test antenna factor in dB/m, KG is the
combined pre-amplifier gain and cable loss in dB, KE is duty correction factor (when applicable) in dB, and CF is
a distance conversion (employed only if limits are specified at alternate distance) in dB. This field strength value is
then compared with the regulatory limit. If effective isotropic radiated power (EIRP) is computed, it is computed as
EIRP (dBm) = E3m (dBµV /m) − 95.2.
When presenting data at each frequency, the highest measured emission under all possible EUT orientations (3-axes)
is reported.

Willow Run Test Labs, LLC, 7117 Fieldcrest Dr., Brighton, Michigan 48116 USA Page 9 of 20

Date: November 18, 2016 Prepared For: Schlage Lock Company / Allegion Report No.: 20161114-RPTALEG10009Ar2

4.1.2 Conducted Emissions Test Setup and Procedures
Battery Power Conducted Spurious The EUT is not subject to measurement of power line conducted emissions
as it is powered solely by its internal battery.

4.1.3 Power Supply Variation
Tests at extreme supply voltages are made if required by the the procedures specified in the test standard, and results
of this testing are detailed in this report.
In the case the EUT is designed for operation from a battery power source, the extreme test voltages are evaluated
over the range specified in the test standard; no less than ±10% of the nominal battery voltage declared by the
manufacturer. For all battery operated equipment, worst case intentional and spurious emissions are re-checked
employing a new (fully charged) battery.

4.1.4 Thermal Variation
Tests at extreme temperatures are made if required by the procedures specified in the test standard, and results of
this testing are detailed in this report. The provider has declared that the EUT is designed for operation over the
temperature range −40o to +66o C. Before any temperature measurements are made, the equipment is allowed to
reach a thermal balance in the test chamber, temperature and humidity are recorded, and thermal balance is verified
via a thermocouple–based probe.

Willow Run Test Labs, LLC, 7117 Fieldcrest Dr., Brighton, Michigan 48116 USA Page 11 of 20

Date: November 18, 2016 Prepared For: Schlage Lock Company / Allegion Report No.: 20161114-RPTALEG10009Ar2

4.2 Intentional Emissions
4.2.1 Fundamental Emission Pulsed Operation
The details and results of testing the EUT for pulsed operation are summarized in Table 4. Plots showing the
measurements made to obtain these values are provided in Figure 5.

Table 4: Pulsed Emission Characteristics (Duty Cycle).

Frequency Range Det IF Bandwidth Video Bandwidth Test Date: 10-Nov-16
9 kHz ≤ f ≤ 150 kHz Pk/QPk 200 Hz 300 Hz Test Engineer: Joseph Brunett
150 kHz ≤ f ≤ 30 MHz Pk/QPk 9 kHz/10 kHz 30 kHz EUT Mode: Normal Operating
25 MHz ≤ f ≤ 1 000 MHz Pk/QPk 120 kHz 300 kHz Meas. Distance: 3 meters
f > 1 000 MHz Pk 3 MHz 3MHz EUT Tested: Allegion LE
f > 1 000 MHz Avg 3 MHz 10kHz

Overall Transmission Internal Frame Characteristics
Computed Duty Cycle*
Min. Total
Repetition Max. No. Transmission Max. Frame Min. Frame
# EUT Mode Rate (sec) of Frames Length (sec) Length (ms) Period (s) Frame Encoding (%) Duty (dB)
When a passive access key card is place over the access pad
on the front of the EUT, the lock interrogates the passive card
1 Normal (125 kHz) 1.43 2 - 200.8 >100 ms once every 1.43 seconds with a set of two CW pulses, the N/A N/A
longest of which has on on time of 201ms. If the key card is
removed, the interrogation ceases.

When a passive access key card is place over the access pad
on the front of the EUT, the lock interrogates the passive card
2 Normal (13.56 MHz) 0.76 4 0.2226 129.9 >100 ms once every 0.76 seconds with a set of 4 CW pulses, the longest N/A N/A
of which has an on time of 130ms. If the key card is removed,
the interrogation ceases.

* No Duty Cycle is employed when demonstrating compliance.

Willow Run Test Labs, LLC, 7117 Fieldcrest Dr., Brighton, Michigan 48116 USA Page 12 of 20

Date: November 18, 2016 Prepared For: Schlage Lock Company / Allegion Report No.: 20161114-RPTALEG10009Ar2

4.2.2 Fundamental Emission Bandwidth
Emission bandwidth (EBW) of the EUT is measured with the device placed in the test mode(s) with the shortest
available frame length and minimum frame spacing. Radiated emissions are recorded following the test procedures
listed in Section 2.1. The 20 dB EBW is measured as the max-held peak-detected signal when the IF bandwidth
is greater than or equal to 1% of the receiver span. For complex modulations other than ASK and FSK, the 99%
emission bandwidth per IC test procedures has a different result, and is also separately reported.The results of EBW
testing are summarized in Table 5. Plots showing measurements employed to obtain the emission bandwidth reported
are provided in Figure 6.

Table 5: Intentional Emission Bandwidth.

Frequency Range Det IF Bandwidth Video Bandwidth Test Date: 10-Nov-16
9 kHz ≤ f ≤ 150 kHz Pk > 1% Span >= 3 * IFBW Test Engineer: Joseph Brunett
150 kHz ≤ f ≤ 30 MHz Pk > 1% Span >= 3 * IFBW EUT Mode: Normal Operating
Meas. Distance: 0.1 meters
EUT Tested: Allegion LE

Frequency Range Supply 99% PWR BW 20 dB EBW 110 kHz Restricted Band
# (MHz) Temp (C) (VDC) (kHz) (kHz) (dBc)
1 0.125 21 6 9.94 4.75 37.0
2 13.56 21 6 510.5 430.6 N/A

Willow Run Test Labs, LLC, 7117 Fieldcrest Dr., Brighton, Michigan 48116 USA Page 14 of 20

Date: November 18, 2016 Prepared For: Schlage Lock Company / Allegion Report No.: 20161114-RPTALEG10009Ar2

4.2.3 Fundamental Emission
Following the test procedures listed in Section 2.1, field emissions measurements are made on the EUT for both
Horizontal and Vertically polarized coupling fields. The EUT’s loop antenna(s) are measured when the EUT loop
axes are (1) aligned along the same axis as the test loop antenna and horizontal with respect to the test site ground
plane, (2) aligned coplanar (in the same plane) with the test antenna and aligned horizontal with respect to the test
site ground plane, and (3) aligned coplanar (in the same plane) with the test antenna and vertical with respect to
the test site ground plane. Table 6 details the results of these measurements.

Table 6: Fundamental Radiated Emissions.

Frequency Range Det IF Bandwidth Video Bandwidth Test Date: 25-Oct-16
9 kHz ≤ f ≤ 150 kHz Pk/QPk 200 Hz 300 Hz Test Engineer: Joseph Brunett
150 kHz ≤ f ≤ 30 MHz Pk/QPk 9 kHz 30 kHz EUT Mode: CW
25 MHz ≤ f ≤ 1 000 MHz Pk/QPk 120 kHz 300 kHz Meas. Distance: 3 meters
f > 1 000 MHz Pk 1 MHz 3MHz EUT Tested: Allegion LE
f > 1 000 MHz Avg 1 MHz 3MHz

Fundamental Emissions Measurements
Test Antenna Freq. Ant. Pr (Pk) Pr (QPk/Avg)* Ka Kg Cf** E3m (Pk) E300m (Pk) E30m (QPk/Avg) E300m Limit
Pass By***
# Mode Polarization MHz Used dBm dBm dB/m dB 3m / 300m (dB) dBuV/m dBuV/m dBuV/m dBuV/m
1 LE-GRW
2 Coaxial - Horz 0.125 S. Loop -60.2 10.1 0.0 80.0 56.9 -23.1 25.7 48.8
3 CW Coplanar - Vert 0.125 S. Loop -67.1 10.1 0.0 80.0 50.0 -30.0 25.7 55.7
4 Coplanar - Horz 0.125 S. Loop -68.7 10.1 0.0 80.0 48.4 -31.6 25.7 57.3
5 LE-ADD
6 Coaxial - Horz 0.125 S. Loop -62.6 9.7 0.0 80.0 54.1 -25.9 25.7 51.6
7 CW Coplanar - Vert 0.125 S. Loop -69.1 9.7 0.0 80.0 47.6 -32.4 25.7 58.1
8 Coplanar - Horz 0.125 S. Loop -71.6 9.7 0.0 80.0 45.1 -34.9 25.7 60.6
Test Antenna Freq. Ant. Pr (Pk) Pr (QPk/Avg)* Ka Kg Cf** E30m (Pk) E30m (Pk) E30m (QPk/Avg) E30m Limit
Pass By***
# Mode Polarization MHz Used dBm dBm dB/m dB 3m / 30m (dB) dBuV/m dBuV/m dBuV/m dBuV/m
10 LE-GRW
11 Coaxial - Horz 13.56 S. Loop -62.8 10.6 0.0 40.0 54.8 14.8 29.5 14.7
12 CW Coplanar - Vert 13.56 S. Loop -70.1 10.6 0.0 40.0 47.5 7.5 29.5 22.0
13 Coplanar - Horz 13.56 S. Loop -70.2 10.6 0.0 40.0 47.4 7.4 29.5 22.1
14 LE-ADD
15 Coaxial - Horz 13.56 S. Loop -65.5 10.6 0.0 40.0 52.1 12.1 29.5 17.4
16 CW Coplanar - Vert 13.56 S. Loop -71.6 10.6 0.0 40.0 46.0 6.0 29.5 23.5
17 Coplanar - Horz 13.56 S. Loop -71.6 10.6 0.0 40.0 46.0 6.0 29.5 23.5
18
Test Antenna Freq. DC Supply Pr (Pk)
# Mode Polarization MHz Voltage dBm
16 .125 6.90 -60.1
17 CW Coaxial - Horz .125 6.00 -60.2
18 .125 5.10 -60.1
19 13.56 6.90 -62.4
20 CW Coaxial - Horz 13.56 6.00 -62.8
21 13.56 5.10 -62.6
* EUT was tested in CW mode. No averaging applies and Quasi-Peak data was not needed to demonstrate compliance.
** 40 dB/dec conversion factor employed

Willow Run Test Labs, LLC, 7117 Fieldcrest Dr., Brighton, Michigan 48116 USA Page 16 of 20

Date: November 18, 2016 Prepared For: Schlage Lock Company / Allegion Report No.: 20161114-RPTALEG10009Ar2

4.3 Unintentional Emissions
4.3.1 Transmit Chain Spurious Emissions
The results for the measurement of transmit chain spurious emissions at the nominal voltage and temperature are
provided in Table 7. Following the test procedures listed in Section 2.1, field emissions measurements are made on
the EUT for both Horizontal and Vertically polarized coupling fields. The EUT’s loop antenna(s) are measured when
the EUT loop axes are (1) aligned along the same axis as the test loop antenna and horizontal with respect to the
test site ground plane, (2) aligned coplanar (in the same plane) with the test antenna and aligned horizontal with
respect to the test site ground plane, and (3) aligned coplanar (in the same plane) with the test antenna and vertical
with respect to the test site ground plane. The results for the measurement of transmit chain spurious emissions at
the nominal voltage and temperature are provided in Table 7. Measurements are performed to 10 times the highest
fundamental operating frequency.

Table 7(a): Transmit Chain Spurious Emissions.

Frequency Range Det IF Bandwidth Video Bandwidth Test Date: 24-Oct-16
9 kHz ≤ f ≤ 150 kHz Pk/QPk 200 Hz 300 Hz Test Engineer: Joseph Brunett
150 kHz ≤ f ≤ 30 MHz Pk/QPk 9 kHz 30 kHz EUT Mode: CW
25 MHz ≤ f ≤ 1 000 MHz Pk/QPk 120 kHz 300 kHz Meas. Distance: 3 meters
f > 1 000 MHz Pk 3 MHz 3MHz EUT Tested: Allegion LE
f > 1 000 MHz Avg 3 MHz 10kHz

Transmit Chain Spurious Emissions
Test Antenna Freq. Ant. Pr (Pk) Pr (QPk/Avg)* Ka Kg Cf** E-field E-field Limit
(3 to 300m) (Pk) (Qpk/Avg) (300m / 3m) Pass By
# Mode Polarization kHz Used dBm dBm dB/m dB dB dBuV/m dBuV/m dBuV/m Comments
1 LE-GRW
2 Coaxial - Horz 250.0 SHLOOP01 -77.9 10.0 0.0 80.0 -40.9 19.6 60.5
3 Coplanar - Vert 250.0 SHLOOP01 -85.2 10.0 0.0 80.0 -48.2 19.6 67.8
4 Coplanar - Horz 250.0 SHLOOP01 -86.4 10.0 0.0 80.0 -49.4 19.6 69.0
5 H/V (worst case) 375.0 SHLOOP01 -85.2 10.0 0.0 80.0 -48.2 16.1 64.3 background
6 H/V (worst case) 500.0 SHLOOP01 -88.0 10.2 0.0 80.0 -50.8 33.6 84.4 background
7 CW H/V (worst case) 625.0 SHLOOP01 -89.9 10.2 0.0 80.0 -52.7 31.7 84.4 noise
8 H/V (worst case) 750.0 SHLOOP01 -84.8 10.1 0.0 80.0 -47.7 30.1 77.8 background
9 H/V (worst case) 875.0 SHLOOP01 -86.2 10.2 0.0 80.0 -49.0 28.8 77.8 background
10 H/V (worst case) 1000.0 SHLOOP01 -85.3 10.4 0.0 80.0 -47.9 27.6 75.5 background
11 H/V (worst case) 1125.0 SHLOOP01 -86.5 10.4 0.0 80.0 -49.1 26.6 75.7 background
12 H/V (worst case) 1250.0 SHLOOP01 -92.4 10.4 0.0 80.0 -55.0 25.7 80.7 noise
13 LE-ADD
14 Coaxial - Horz 250.0 SHLOOP01 -77.3 10.0 0.0 80.0 -40.3 19.6 59.9
15 Coplanar - Vert 250.0 SHLOOP01 -84.6 10.0 0.0 80.0 -47.6 19.6 67.2
16 Coplanar - Horz 250.0 SHLOOP01 -87.6 10.0 0.0 80.0 -50.6 19.6 70.2
17 H/V (worst case) 375.0 SHLOOP01 -86.0 10.0 0.0 80.0 -49.0 16.1 65.1 background
18 H/V (worst case) 500.0 SHLOOP01 -88.0 10.2 0.0 80.0 -50.8 33.6 84.4 background
19 CW H/V (worst case) 625.0 SHLOOP01 -91.7 10.2 0.0 80.0 -54.5 31.7 86.2 noise
20 H/V (worst case) 750.0 SHLOOP01 -85.5 10.1 0.0 80.0 -48.4 30.1 78.5 background
21 H/V (worst case) 875.0 SHLOOP01 -89.1 10.2 0.0 80.0 -51.9 28.8 80.7 background
22 H/V (worst case) 1000.0 SHLOOP01 -84.9 10.4 0.0 80.0 -47.5 27.6 75.1 background
23 H/V (worst case) 1125.0 SHLOOP01 -86.7 10.4 0.0 80.0 -49.3 26.6 75.9 background
24 H/V (worst case) 1250.0 SHLOOP01 -92.4 10.4 0.0 80.0 -55.0 25.7 80.7 noise
* EUT was tested in CW mode. No averaging applies and Quasi-Peak data was not needed to demonstrate compliance.
** 40 dB/dec Far-field conversion factor employed.

Willow Run Test Labs, LLC, 7117 Fieldcrest Dr., Brighton, Michigan 48116 USA Page 17 of 20

Date: November 18, 2016 Prepared For: Schlage Lock Company / Allegion Report No.: 20161114-RPTALEG10009Ar2

Table 7(b): Transmit Chain Spurious Emissions.

Frequency Range Det IF Bandwidth Video Bandwidth Test Date: 24-Oct-16
9 kHz ≤ f ≤ 150 kHz Pk/QPk 200 Hz 300 Hz Test Engineer: Joseph Brunett
150 kHz ≤ f ≤ 30 MHz Pk/QPk 9 kHz 30 kHz EUT Mode: CW
25 MHz ≤ f ≤ 1 000 MHz Pk/QPk 120 kHz 300 kHz Meas. Distance: 3 meters
f > 1 000 MHz Pk 3 MHz 3MHz EUT Tested: Allegion LE
f > 1 000 MHz Avg 3 MHz 10kHz

Transmit Chain Spurious Emissions
Test Antenna Freq. Ant. Pr (Pk) Pr (QPk/Avg)* Ka Kg Cf** E-field*** E-field Limit
(3 to 30m) (Pk) (Qpk/Avg) (30m / 3m) Pass By
# Mode Polarization MHz Used dBm dBm dB/m dB dB dBuV/m dBuV/m dBuV/m Comments
1 LE-GRW
2 Coaxial - Horz 27.1 SHLOOP01 -95.2 8.7 0.0 20.0 .5 29.5 29.0 max all, noise
3 Coplanar - Vert 27.1 SHLOOP01 -98.2 8.7 0.0 20.0 -2.5 29.5 32.0 max all, noise
4 Coplanar - Horz 27.1 SHLOOP01 -99.0 8.7 0.0 20.0 -3.3 29.5 32.8 max all, noise
5 H/V (worst case) 40.7 BICEMCO01 10.6 39.4 .0 13.7 40.0 26.3 noise
6 H/V (worst case) 54.2 BICEMCO01 8.6 39.1 .0 12.9 40.0 27.1 noise
7 CW H/V (worst case) 67.8 BICEMCO01 7.7 38.8 .0 19.2 40.0 20.8 noise
8 H/V (worst case) 81.4 BICEMCO01 7.6 38.5 .0 24.1 40.0 15.9 noise
9 H/V (worst case) 94.9 BICEMCO01 8.1 38.2 .0 34.9 43.5 8.6 background
10 H/V (worst case) 108.5 BICEMCO01 9.0 37.9 .0 24.1 43.5 19.4 noise
11 H/V (worst case) 122.0 BICEMCO01 10.2 37.6 .0 23.5 43.5 20.0 noise
12 H/V (worst case) 135.6 BICEMCO01 11.3 37.4 .0 22.0 43.5 21.5 noise
13 LE-ADD
14 Coaxial - Horz 27.1 SHLOOP01 -95.6 8.7 0.0 20.0 .1 29.5 29.4 background
15 Coplanar - Vert 27.1 SHLOOP01 -97.4 8.7 0.0 20.0 -1.7 29.5 31.2 background
16 Coplanar - Horz 27.1 SHLOOP01 -98.2 8.7 0.0 20.0 -2.5 29.5 32.0 background
17 H/V (worst case) 40.7 BICEMCO01 10.6 39.4 .0 14.8 40.0 25.2 noise
18 H/V (worst case) 54.2 BICEMCO01 8.6 39.1 .0 12.7 40.0 27.3 noise
19 CW H/V (worst case) 67.8 BICEMCO01 7.7 38.8 .0 18.9 40.0 21.1 noise
20 H/V (worst case) 81.4 BICEMCO01 7.6 38.5 .0 23.2 40.0 16.8 noise
21 H/V (worst case) 94.9 BICEMCO01 8.1 38.2 .0 35.0 43.5 8.5 background
22 H/V (worst case) 108.5 BICEMCO01 9.0 37.9 .0 23.7 43.5 19.8 noise
23 H/V (worst case) 122.0 BICEMCO01 10.2 37.6 .0 23.4 43.5 20.1 noise
24 H/V (worst case) 135.6 BICEMCO01 11.3 37.4 .0 21.9 43.5 21.6 noise
* EUT was tested in CW mode. No averaging applies and Quasi-Peak data was not needed to demonstrate compliance.
** 20 dB/dec Far-field conversion factor employed, if 3 meters > lambda/(2*pi)
*** When E-field is reported directly from Spectrum Analyzer, Antenna Factors and Cable losses are included directly in SA settings.

Willow Run Test Labs, LLC, 7117 Fieldcrest Dr., Brighton, Michigan 48116 USA Page 18 of 20

Date: November 18, 2016 Prepared For: Schlage Lock Company / Allegion Report No.: 20161114-RPTALEG10009Ar2

4.3.2 Radiated Digital Spurious
The results for the measurement of digital spurious emissions (emissions arising from digital circuitry) at the nominal
voltage and temperature are provided in Table 8. Radiation from digital components has been measured to 1000 MHz
or to the highest frequency required by the applied standards, whichever is greater.

Table 8: Radiated Digital Spurious Emissions.

Frequency Range Det IF Bandwidth Video Bandwidth Test Date: 10-Nov-16
25 MHz ≤ f ≤ 1 000 MHz Pk/QPk 120 kHz 300 kHz Test Engineer: Joseph Brunett
f > 1 000 MHz Pk 1 MHz 3 MHz EUT: Allegion LE
f > 1 000 MHz Avg 1 MHz 10kHz EUT Mode: LF+RF Active
Meas. Distance: 3 meters

Digital Spurious Emissions FCC/IC + CE(CISPR)
Test Antenna Pr (Pwr Rx.)* E-Field @ 3m** FCC/IC Class B CE Class B FCC/IC Class A CE Class A
Freq. QN Test Pk QPk/Avg Ka Kg Pk QPk/Avg E3lim Pass E3lim Pass E3lim Pass E3lim Pass
# MHz Used Pol. dBm dBm dB/m dB dBµV/m dBµV/m dBµV/m dB dBµV/m dB dBµV/m dB dBµV/m dB Comments
1 Worst Case Emissions from both LE-ADD and LE-GRW variants.
2 75.0 BICEMCO01 H 7.5 36.5 16.9 40.0 23.1 40.5 23.6 49.5 32.6 50.5 33.6
3 75.0 BICEMCO01 V 7.5 36.5 25.4 40.0 14.6 40.5 15.1 49.5 24.1 50.5 25.1 background
4 132.5 BICEMCO01 H 11.1 35.3 25.3 43.5 18.2 40.5 15.2 54.0 28.7 50.5 25.2
5 132.5 BICEMCO01 V 11.1 35.3 24.5 43.5 19.0 40.5 16.0 54.0 29.5 50.5 26.0
6 156.0 BICEMCO01 V 12.9 34.9 25.3 43.5 18.2 40.5 15.2 54.0 28.7 50.5 25.2
7 190.0 BICEMCO01 H 14.5 34.3 22.9 43.5 20.6 40.5 17.6 54.0 31.1 50.5 27.6
8 190.0 BICEMCO01 V 14.5 34.3 22.2 43.5 21.3 40.5 18.3 54.0 31.8 50.5 28.3
9 210.0 BICEMCO01 H 14.8 34.0 20.8 43.5 22.7 40.5 19.7 54.0 33.2 50.5 29.7
10 210.0 BICEMCO01 V 14.8 34.0 23.8 43.5 19.7 40.5 16.7 54.0 30.2 50.5 26.7
11 288.0 LOGEMCO01 H 13.5 32.9 27.1 46.0 18.9 47.5 20.4 56.9 29.8 57.5 30.4
12 288.0 LOGEMCO01 V 13.5 32.9 18.5 46.0 27.5 47.5 29.0 56.9 38.4 57.5 39.0
13 397.0 LOGEMCO01 H 15.7 31.5 18.0 46.0 28.0 47.5 29.5 56.9 38.9 57.5 39.5
14 397.0 LOGEMCO01 V 15.7 31.5 19.3 46.0 26.7 47.5 28.2 56.9 37.6 57.5 38.2
15 421.0 LOGEMCO01 H 16.1 31.3 15.7 46.0 30.3 47.5 31.8 56.9 41.2 57.5 41.8
16 421.0 LOGEMCO01 V 16.1 31.3 24.8 46.0 21.2 47.5 22.7 56.9 32.1 57.5 32.7
17 443.3 LOGEMCO01 H 16.5 31.0 26.6 46.0 19.4 47.5 20.9 56.9 30.3 57.5 30.9
18 443.3 LOGEMCO01 V 16.5 31.0 23.1 46.0 22.9 47.5 24.4 56.9 33.8 57.5 34.4
19 454.3 LOGEMCO01 H 16.7 30.9 17.0 46.0 29.0 47.5 30.5 56.9 39.9 57.5 40.5
20 454.3 LOGEMCO01 V 16.7 30.9 18.4 46.0 27.6 47.5 29.1 56.9 38.5 57.5 39.1
21 473.0 LOGEMCO01 H 17.0 30.7 20.2 46.0 25.8 47.5 27.3 56.9 36.7 57.5 37.3
22 473.0 LOGEMCO01 V 17.0 30.7 23.5 46.0 22.5 47.5 24.0 56.9 33.4 57.5 34.0
23 478.8 LOGEMCO01 H 17.1 30.6 25.2 46.0 20.8 47.5 22.3 56.9 31.7 57.5 32.3
24 478.8 LOGEMCO01 V 17.1 30.6 32.1 46.0 13.9 47.5 15.4 56.9 24.8 57.5 25.4 background
25 485.6 LOGEMCO01 H 17.2 30.6 28.2 46.0 17.8 47.5 19.3 56.9 28.7 57.5 29.3 background
26 485.6 LOGEMCO01 V 17.2 30.6 16.9 46.0 29.1 47.5 30.6 56.9 40.0 57.5 40.6
27 492.5 LOGEMCO01 H 17.3 30.5 17.0 46.0 29.0 47.5 30.5 56.9 39.9 57.5 40.5
28 492.5 LOGEMCO01 V 17.3 30.5 20.5 46.0 25.5 47.5 27.0 56.9 36.4 57.5 37.0
29 760.0 LOGEMCO01 H 21.1 27.9 29.5 46.0 16.5 47.5 18.0 56.9 27.4 57.5 28.0 background
30 760.0 LOGEMCO01 V 21.1 27.9 30.5 46.0 15.5 47.5 17.0 56.9 26.4 57.5 27.0 background
31 910.0 LOGEMCO01 H 22.7 26.5 24.4 46.0 21.6 47.5 23.1 56.9 32.5 57.5 33.1
32 910.0 LOGEMCO01 V 22.7 26.5 19.2 46.0 26.8 47.5 28.3 56.9 37.7 57.5 38.3
33 925.8 LOGEMCO01 H 22.9 26.4 32.8 46.0 13.2 47.5 14.7 56.9 24.1 57.5 24.7 background
34 925.8 LOGEMCO01 V 22.9 26.4 34.2 46.0 11.8 47.5 13.3 56.9 22.7 57.5 23.3 background
35 972.3 LOGEMCO01 H 23.6 25.9 39.7 54.0 14.3 47.5 7.8 60.0 20.3 57.5 17.8 background
36 972.3 LOGEMCO01 V 23.6 25.9 31.3 54.0 22.7 47.5 16.2 60.0 28.7 57.5 26.2
37
*QPk detection below 1 GHz, Avg detection at or above 1 GHz with receiver bandwidth as specified at top of table.
** When E-field is reported directly from Spectrum Analyzer, Antenna Factors and Cable losses are included directly in SA settings.

Willow Run Test Labs, LLC, 7117 Fieldcrest Dr., Brighton, Michigan 48116 USA Page 19 of 20

Date: November 18, 2016 Prepared For: Schlage Lock Company / Allegion Report No.: 20161114-RPTALEG10009Ar2

5 Measurement Uncertainty
The maximum values of measurement uncertainty for the laboratory test equipment and facilities associated with
each test are given in the table below. This uncertainty is computed for a 95.45% confidence level based on a coverage
factor of k = 2.

Table 9: Measurement Uncertainty.

Measured Parameter Measurement Uncertainty†
7
Radio Frequency ±(fM kr /10 + RBW/10 + (SP N/(P T S − 1))/2 + 1 Hz)
Conducted Emm. Amplitude ±1.8 dB
Radiated Emm. Amplitude (30 − 200 MHz) ±2.7 dB
Radiated Emm. Amplitude (200 − 1000 MHz) ±2.5 dB
Radiated Emm. Amplitude (f > 1000 MHz) ±3.7 dB
DC and Low Frequency Voltages ±2%
Temperature ±0.5◦ C
Humidity ±5%
† Ref: CISPR 16-4-2:2011+A1:2014

Willow Run Test Labs, LLC, 7117 Fieldcrest Dr., Brighton, Michigan 48116 USA Page 20 of 20

Document Created: 2016-12-23 11:20:34
Document Modified: 2016-12-23 11:20:34

© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC