SAR Report 1

FCC ID: SS4BIP5XX0

RF Exposure Info

Download: PDF
FCCID_750357

Report File No. : STROS-07-001-A1 Date of Issue : 2007-01-18 Page : 1 / 102 SAR TEST REPORT Equipment Under Test : Industrial PDA Model No. : BIP-5000 Applicant : BluebirdSoft., Inc. Address of Applicant : 558-5, Sinsa-dong, Kangnam-gu, Seoul, Korea FCC ID SS4BIP5XX0 Device Category : Portable Device Exposure Category : General Population/Uncontrolled Exposure Date of Receipt : 2006-12-22 Date of Test(s) : 2007-01-02 ~ 04, 17 Date of Issue : 2007-01-18 Standards: FCC OET Bulletin 65 supplement C IEEE 1528, 2003 ANSI/IEEE C95.1, C95.3 In the configuration tested, the EUT complied with the standards specified above. Remarks: This report details the results of the testing carried out on one sample, the results contained in this test report do not relate to other samples of the same product. The manufacturer should ensure that all products in series production are in conformity with the product sample detailed in this report. This report may only be reproduced and distributed in full. If the product in this report is used in any configuration other than that detailed in the report, the manufacturer must ensure the new system complies with all relevant standards. Any mention of SGS Testing Korea Co., Ltd. or testing done by SGS Testing Korea Co., Ltd. in connection with distribution or use of the product described in this report must be approved by SGS Testing Korea Co., Ltd. in writing. Tested by : Leo Kim 2007-01-18 Approved by : Albert Lim 2007-01-18

Report File No. : STROS-07-001-A1 Date of Issue : 2007-01-18 Page : 2 / 102 Contents 1. General Information 1.1 Testing Laboratory………………………………………………………………………………. 3 1.2 Details of Applicant……………………………………………………………………………... 3 1.3 Version of Report………………………………………………………………………………... 3 1.4 Description of EUT(s)…………………………………………………………………………… 3 1.5 Test Environment………………………………………………………………………………... 4 1.6 Operation description……………………………………………………………………………. 4 1.7 Evaluation procedures…………………………………………………………………………… 4 1.8 The SAR Measurement System…………………………………………………………………. 5 1.9 System Components……………………………………………………………………………... 7 1.10 SAR System Verification………………………………………………………………………... 8 1.11 Tissue Simulant Fluid for the Frequency Band…………………………………………………. 10 1.12 Test Standards and Limits………………………………………………………………………. 11 2. Instruments List………………………………………………………………………… 13 3. Summary of Results…………………………………………………………………….. 14 APPENDIX A. Photographs of EUT & EUT’s Test Setup B. DASY4 SAR Report C. Uncertainty Analysis D. Calibration certificate

Report File No. : STROS-07-001-A1 Date of Issue : 2007-01-18 Page : 3 / 102 1. General Information 1.1 Testing Laboratory SGS Testing Korea Co., Ltd. Wireless Div. 2FL, 18-34, Sanbon-dong, Gunpo-si, Gyeonggi-do, Korea 435-040 Telephone : +82 +31 428 5700 FAX : +82 +31 427 2371 Homepage : www.electrolab.kr.sgs.com 1.2 Details of Applicant Manufacturer : BluebirdSoft., Inc. Address : 558-5, Sinsa-dong, Kangnam-gu, Seoul, Korea Contact Person : Chan-Woong Park Phone No. : 82-2-548-0740 Fax No. : 82-2-548-0870 1.3 Version of Report Version Number Date Revision 00 2007-01-07 Initial issue 01 2007-01-18 Revision 1 1.4 Description of EUT(s) EUT Type : Industrial PDA Model : BIP-5000 Serial Number : S500GGFHJA079 Hardware Version : N/A Software Version : OS: Window Mobile 5.1.195, ROM version : 6298 : GSM Quad-band (Only applicable for GSM850,1900) Mode of Operation : W-LAN IEEE 802.11 b/g, Bluetooth : Claas B Mobile Phone capabilities : GPRS/EDGE and WLAN are not operated simultaneously Duty Cycle : GSM 12.5%, GPRS/EDGE 25%, WLAN/BT 100% Body worn Accessory : None : 824.2~848.8 MHz (GSM850), 1850.2~1909.8 MHz(GSM 1900) Tx Frequency Range 2412 ~ 2462 MHz(WLAN) : GSM : FPCB Antenna, model : None Antenna WLAN : Comata 2.4GHz SMD Antenna, model 3030A6111-01 Bluetooth : Comata 2.4GHz SMD Antenna, model 3030A6111-01 Battery Type : 3.7 VDC Lithium-Ion Battery

Report File No. : STROS-07-001-A1 Date of Issue : 2007-01-18 Page : 4 / 102 1.5 Test Environment Ambient temperature : 22.2 ° C Tissue Simulating Liquid : 22.1 ° C Relative Humidity : 54 % 1.6 Operation Configuration The device in GSM mode was controlled by using a Communication tester(CMU200). Communication between the device and the tester was established by air link. For WLAN and BT, the client provided a special driver and test program which can control the frequency and power of the module. Measurements were performed at the lowest, middle and highest channels of the operating band. The EUT was set to maximum power level during all tests and at the beginning of each test the battery was fully charged. The DASY4 system measures power drift during SAR testing by comparing e-field in the same location at the beginning and at the end of measurement. 1.7 EVALUATION PROCEDURES - Power Reference Measurement Procedures The Power Reference Measurement and Power Drift Measurements are for monitoring the power drift of the device under test in the batch process. The Minimum distance of probe sensors to surface determines the closest measurement point to phantom surface. The minimum distance of probe sensors to surface is 4 mm. This distance cannot be smaller than the Distance of sensor calibration points to probe tip as defined in the probe properties (for example, 2.7 mm for an ET3DV6 probe type). - The entire evaluation of the spatial peak values is performed within the Post-processing engine (SEMCAD). The system always gives the maximum values for the 1 g and 10 g cubes. The algorithm to find the cube with highest averaged SAR is divided into the following stages: 1. The extraction of the measured data (grid and values) from the Zoom Scan. 2. The calculation of the SAR value at every measurement point based on all stored data (A/D values and measurement parameters) 3. The generation of a high-resolution mesh within the measured volume 4. The interpolation of all measured values from the measurement grid to the high-resolution grid 5. The extrapolation of the entire 3-D field distribution to the phantom surface over the distance from sensor to surface

Report File No. : STROS-07-001-A1 Date of Issue : 2007-01-18 Page : 5 / 102 6. The calculation of the averaged SAR within masses of 1g and 10g. The probe is calibrated at the center of the dipole sensors that is located 1 to 2.7mm away from the probe tip. During measurements, the probe stops shortly above the phantom surface, depending on the probe and the surface detecting system. Both distances are included as parameters in the probe configuration file. The software always knows exactly how far away the measured point is from the surface. As the probe cannot directly measure at the surface, the values between the deepest measured point and the surface must be extrapolated. The angle between the probe axis and the surface normal line is less than 30 degree. In the Area Scan, the gradient of the interpolation function is evaluated to find all the extreme of the SAR distribution. The uncertainty on the locations of the extreme is less than 1/20 of the grid size. Only local maximum within –2 dB of the global maximum are searched and passed for the Cube Scan measurement. In the Cube Scan, the interpolation function is used to extrapolate the Peak SAR from the lowest measurement points to the inner phantom surface (the extrapolation distance). The uncertainty increases with the extrapolation distance. To keep the uncertainty within 1% for the 1 g and 10 g cubes, the extrapolation distance should not be larger than 5mm. The maximum search is automatically performed after each area scan measurement. It is based on splines in two or three dimensions. The procedure can find the maximum for most SAR distributions even with relatively large grid spacing. After the area scanning measurement, the probe is automatically moved to a position at the interpolated maximum. The following scan can directly use this position for reference, e.g., for a finer resolution grid or the cube evaluations. The 1g and 10g peak evaluations are only available for the predefined cube 7x7x7 scans. The routines are verified and optimized for the grid dimensions used in these cube measurements. The measured volume of 30x30x30mm contains about 30g of tissue. The first procedure is an extrapolation (incl. Boundary correction) to get the points between the lowest measured plane and the surface. The next step uses 3D interpolation to get all points within the measured volume. In the last step, a 1g cube is placed numerically into the volume and its averaged SAR is calculated. This cube is the moved around until the highest averaged SAR is found. If the highest SAR is found at the edge of the measured volume, the system will issue a warning: higher SAR values might be found outside of the measured volume. In that case the cube measurement can be repeated, using the new interpolated maximum as the center. 1.8 The SAR Measurement System A photograph of the SAR measurement System is given in Fig. a. This SAR Measurement System uses a Computer-controlled 3-D stepper motor system ( Speag Dasy 4 professional system ). A Model ET3DV6 1782 E-field probe is used to determine the internal electric fields. The SAR can be obtained from the equation SAR= ı (|Ei|2)/ ȡ where ı and ȡ are the conductivity and mass density of the tissue-simulant. The DASY4 system for performing compliance tests consists of the following items: •A standard high precision 6-axis robot (Staubli RX family) with controller, teach pendant and software. An

Report File No. : STROS-07-001-A1 Date of Issue : 2007-01-18 Page : 6 / 102 arm extension for accommodating the data acquisition electronics (DAE). •A dosimeter probe, i.e., an isotropic E-field probe optimized and calibrated for usage in tissue simulating liquid. The probe is equipped with an optical surface detector system. •A data acquisition electronics (DAE) which performs the signal amplification, signal multiplexing, AD- conversion, offset measurements, mechanical surface detection, collision detection, etc. The unit is battery powered with standard or rechargeable batteries. The signal is optically transmitted to the EOC. Fig a. The microwave circuit arrangement used for SAR system verification • The Electro-optical converter (EOC) performs the conversion between optical and electrical of the signals for the digital communication to the DAE and for the analog signal from the optical surface detection. The EOC is connected to the measurement server. • The function of the measurement server is to perform the time critical tasks such as signal filtering, control of the robot operation and fast movement interrupts. • A probe alignment unit which improves the (absolute) accuracy of the probe positioning. • A computer operating Windows 2000 or Windows XP. • DASY4 software. • Remote control with teach pendant and additional circuitry for robot safety such as warning lamps, etc. • The SAM twin phantom enabling testing left-hand and right-hand usage. • The device holder for handheld mobile phones. • Tissue simulating liquid mixed according to the given recipes. • Validation dipole kits allowing to validate the proper functioning of the system.

Report File No. : STROS-07-001-A1 Date of Issue : 2007-01-18 Page : 7 / 102 1.9 System Components ET3DV6 E-Field Probe Construction : Symmetrical design with triangular core Built-in shielding against static charges PEEK enclosure material (resistant to organic solvents, e.g. glycol). Calibration : In air from 10 MHz to 2.5 GHz In brain simulating tissue (accuracy ± 8%) Frequency : 10 MHz to >6 GHz; Linearity: ±0.2 dB (30 MHz to 3 GHz) Directivity : ±0.2 dB in brain tissue (rotation around probe axis) ±0.4 dB in brain tissue (rotation normal to probe axis) Dynamic : 5 µW/g to >100 mW/g; Linearity: ±0.2 dB Range Srfce. Detect : ±0.2 mm repeatability in air and clear liquids over diffuse reflecting surfaces Dimensions : Overall length: 330 mm Tip length: 16 mm Body diameter: 12 mm ET3DV6 E-Field Probe Tip diameter: 6.8 mm Distance from probe tip to dipole centers: 2.7 mm Application : General dosimetry up to 3 GHz Compliance tests of mobile phone NOTE: 1. The Probe parameters have been calibrated by the SPEAG. Please reference “APPENDIX D” for the Calibration Certification Report.

Report File No. : STROS-07-001-A1 Date of Issue : 2007-01-18 Page : 8 / 102 SAM Phantom Construction: The SAM Phantom is constructed of a fiberglass shell integrated in a wooden table. The shape of the shell is based on data from an anatomical study designed to determine the maximum exposure in at least 90% of all users. It enables the dosimetric evaluation of left and right hand phone usage as well as body mounted usage at the flat phantom region. A cover prevents the evaporation of the liquid. Reference markings on the Phantom allow the complete setup of all predefined phantom positions and measurement grids by manually teaching three points in the robot SAM Phantom Shell Thickness: 2.0 ± 0.1 mm Filling Volume: Approx. 25 liters DEVICE HOLDER Construction In combination with the Twin SAM PhantomV4.0/V4.0C or Twin SAM, the Mounting Device (made from POM) enables the rotation of the mounted transmitter in spherical coordinates, whereby the rotation point is the ear opening. The devices can be easily and accurately positioned according to IEC, IEEE, CENELEC, FCC or other specifications. The device holder can be locked at different phantom locations (left head, right head, flat phantom). Device Holder 1.10 SAR System Verification The microwave circuit arrangement for system verification is sketched in Fig. b. The daily system accuracy verification occurs within the flat section of the SAM phantom. A SAR measurement was performed to see if the measured SAR was within +/- 10% from the target SAR values. These tests were done at 835MHz, 1900MHz and 2450MHz. The tests were conducted on the same days as the measurement of the EUT. The obtained results from the system accuracy verification are displayed in the table 1 (SAR values are normalized to 1W forward power delivered to the dipole). During the tests, the ambient temperature of the laboratory was in the range 22.3 °C, the relative humidity was in the range 62% and the liquid depth above the ear reference points was above 15 cm in all the cases. It is seen that the system is operating within its specification, as the results are within acceptable tolerance of the reference values.

Report File No. : STROS-07-001-A1 Date of Issue : 2007-01-18 Page : 9 / 102 Fig b. The microwave circuit arrangement used for SAR system verification A. Agilent Model E4421B Signal Generator B. EMPOWER Model 2001-BBS3Q7ECK Amplifier C. Agilent Model E4419B Power Meter D. Agilent Model 9300H Power Sensor E. Agilent Model 777D/778D Dual directional coupling F. Reference dipole Antenna Photo of the dipole Antenna System Validation Results Target Measured Validation Deviation Liquid Tissue SAR 1 g SAR 1 g Date Kit (%) Temp. (°C) (1 W) (1 W) D835V2 835 MHz 9.5 W/kg 9.24 W/kg -2.74 Jan. 2, 2007 22.2 S/N: 490 Brain D1900V2 1900 MHz 39.7 W/kg 39.2 W/kg -1.26 Jan. 3, 2007 22.1 S/N: 5d033 Brain D2450V2 2450 MHz 52.4 W/kg 53.6 W/kg 2.29 Jan. 4, 2007 22.2 S/N: 734 Brain D2450V2 2450 MHz 52.4 W/kg 50 W/kg -4.58 Jan.17,2007 22.0 S/N: 734 Brain Table 1. Results system validation

Report File No. : STROS-07-001-A1 Date of Issue : 2007-01-18 Page : 10 / 102 1.11 Tissue Simulant Fluid for the Frequency Band The dielectric properties for this simulant fluid were measured by using the Agilent Model 85070D Dielectric Probe (rates frequence band 200 MHz to 20 GHz) in conjunction with Agilent E5070B Network Analyzer(300 KHz-3000 MHz ) by using a procedure detailed in Section V. Dielectric Parameters Tissue f (MHz) Limits / Measured Simulated Tissue type Permittivity Conductivity Temp(୅) Measured, 2007-01-02 42 0.91 22.2 Head Recommended Limits 41.5 0.90 22.0 Deviation(%) 1.2 1.44 - 835 Measured, 2007-01-02 54.36 0.98 22.1 Body Recommended Limits 55.2 0.97 22.0 Deviation(%) -1.52 1.03 - Dielectric Parameters Tissue f (MHz) Limits / Measured Simulated Tissue type Permittivity Conductivity Temp(୅) Measured, 2007-01-03 39.2 1.35 22.3 Head Recommended Limits 40.0 1.40 22.0 Deviation(%) -2 -3.57 - 1900 Measured, 2007-01-03 51.13 1.48 22.2 Body Recommended Limits 53.3 1.52 22.0 Deviation(%) -4.07 -2.63 - Dielectric Parameters Tissue f (MHz) Limits / Measured Simulated Tissue type Permittivity Conductivity Temp(୅) Measured, 2007-01-04 39.5 1.85 22.3 Head Recommended Limits 39.2 1.80 22.0 Deviation(%) 0.77 2.78 - Measured, 2007-01-04 52.08 2.03 22.3 Body Recommended Limits 52.7 1.95 22.0 Deviation(%) -1.17 4.10 - 2450 Measured, 2007-01-17 39.4 1.79 22.0 Head Recommended Limits 39.2 1.80 22.0 Deviation(%) 0.51 -0.56 - Measured, 2007-01-17 52.04 2.045 22.0 Body Recommended Limits 52.7 1.95 22.0 Deviation(%) -1.25 4.87 -

Report File No. : STROS-07-001-A1 Date of Issue : 2007-01-18 Page : 11 / 102 The composition of the brain tissue simulating liquid The following tissue formulations are provided for reference only as some of the parameters have not been thoroughly verified. The composition of ingredients may be modified accordingly to achieve the desired target tissue parameters required for routine SAR evaluation. Ingredients Frequency (MHz) (% by weight) 450 835 915 1900 2450 Tissue Type Head Body Head Body Head Body Head Body Head Body Water 38.56 51.16 41.45 52.4 41.05 56.0 54.9 40.4 62.7 73.2 Salt (NaCl) 3.95 1.49 1.45 1.4 1.35 0.76 0.18 0.5 0.5 0.04 Sugar 56.32 46.78 56.0 45.0 56.5 41.76 0.0 58.0 0.0 0.0 HEC 0.98 0.52 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.21 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 Bactericide 0.19 0.05 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.27 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 Triton X-100 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 36.8 0.0 DGBE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 44.92 0.0 0.0 26.7 Dielectric Constant 43.42 58.0 42.54 56.1 42.0 56.8 39.9 54.0 39.8 52.5 Conductivity (S/m) 0.85 0.83 0.91 0.95 1.0 1.07 1.42 1.45 1.88 1.78 Salt: 99+% Pure Sodium Chloride Sugar: 98+% Pure Sucrose Water: De-ionized, 16 M:+ resistivity HEC: Hydroxyethyl Cellulose + DGBE: 99 % Di(ethylene glycol) butyl ether, [2-(2-butoxyethoxy)ethanol] Triton X-100 (ultra pure): Polyethylene glycol mono [4-(1,1, 3, 3-tetramethylbutyl)phenyl]ether 1.12 Test Standards and Limits According to FCC 47CFR §2.1093(d) The limits to be used for evaluation are based generally on criteria published by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) for localized specific absorption rate (‘‘SAR’’) in Section 4.2 of ‘‘IEEE Standard for Safety Levels with Respect to Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields, 3 kHz to 300 GHz,’’ ANSI/IEEE C95.3–2003, Copyright 2003 by the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc., New York, New York 10017. These criteria for SAR evaluation are similar to those recommended by the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP) in ‘‘Biological Effects and Exposure Criteria for Radio frequency Electromagnetic Fields,’’ NCRP Report No. 86, Section 17.4.5. Copyright NCRP, 1986, Bethesda, Maryland 20814. SAR is a measure of the rate of energy absorption due to exposure to an RF transmitting source. SAR values have

Report File No. : STROS-07-001-A1 Date of Issue : 2007-01-18 Page : 12 / 102 been related to threshold levels for potential biological hazards. The criteria to be used are specified in paragraphs (d)(1) and (d)(2) of this section and shall apply for portable devices transmitting in the frequency range from 100 kHz to 6 GHz. Portable devices that transmit at frequencies above 6 GHz are to be evaluated in terms of the MPE limits specified in § 1.1310 of this chapter. Measurements and calculations to demonstrate compliance with MPE field strength or power density limits for devices operating above 6 GHz should be made at a minimum distance of 5 cm from the radiating source. (1) Limits for Occupational/Controlled exposure: 0.4 W/kg as averaged over the whole-body and spatial peak SAR not exceeding 8 W/kg as averaged over any 1 gram of tissue (defined as a tissue volume in the shape of a cube). Exceptions are the hands, wrists, feet and ankles where the spatial peak SAR shall not exceed 20 W/kg, as averaged over an 10 grams of tissue (defined as a tissue volume in the shape of a cube). Occupational/Controlled limits apply when persons are exposed as a consequence of their employment provided these persons are fully aware of and exercise control over their exposure. Awareness of exposure can be accomplished by use of warning labels or by specific training or education through appropriate means, such as an RF safety program in a work environment. (2) Limits for General Population/Uncontrolled exposure: 0.08 W/kg as averaged over the whole-body and spatial peak SAR not exceeding 1.6 W/kg as averaged over any 1 gram of tissue (defined as a tissue volume in the shape of a cube). Exceptions are the hands, wrists, feet and ankles where the spatial peak SAR shall not exceed 4 W/kg, as averaged over any 10 grams of tissue (defined as a tissue volume in the shape of a cube). General Population/Uncontrolled limits apply when the general public may be exposed, or when persons that are exposed as a consequence of their employment may not be fully aware of the potential for exposure or do not exercise control over their exposure. Warning labels placed on consumer devices such as cellular telephones will not be sufficient reason to allow these devices to be evaluated subject to limits for occupational/controlled exposure in paragraph (d)(1) of this section.(Table .4) Uncontrolled Environment Controlled Environment Human Exposure General Population Occupational Partial Peak SAR (Partial) 1.60 m W/g 8.00 m W/g Partial Average SAR (Whole Body) 0.08 m W/g 0.40 m W/g Partial Peak SAR (Hands/Feet/Ankle/Wrist) 4.00 m W/g 20.00 m W/g Table .4 RF exposure limits

Report File No. : STROS-07-001-A1 Date of Issue : 2007-01-18 Page : 13 / 102 2. Instruments List Serial Due date of Maunfacturer Device Type Number Calibration Stäubli Robot RX90BL F03/5W05A1/A/01 N/A Schmid& Dosimetric E-Field Partner ET3DV6 1782 May 2, 2007 Probe Engineering AG Schmid& 835 MHz System Partner D835V2 490 August 14, 2007 Validation Dipole Engineering AG Schmid& 1900 MHz System Partner D1900V2 5d033 August 16, 2007 Validation Dipole Engineering AG Schmid& 2450 MHz System Partner D2450V2 734 August 21, 2007 Validation Dipole Engineering AG Schmid& Data acquisition Partner DAE3 567 September 22, 2007 Electronics Engineering AG Schmid& Partner Software DASY 4 V4.5 - N/A Engineering AG Schmid& SAM Phantom TP-1299 Partner Phantom N/A V4.0 TP-1300 Engineering AG Agilent Network Analyzer E5070B MY42100282 May 30, 2007 Dielectric Probe Agilent 85070D 2184 N/A Kit Agilent Power Meter E4419B GB43311126 December 8, 2007 MY41495308 Agilent Power Sensor E9300H December 8, 2007 MY41495314 R&S Mobile Test Unit CMU200 GB43345198 December 28, 2007

Report File No. : STROS-07-001-A1 Date of Issue : 2007-01-18 Page : 14 / 102 3.Summary of Results Ambient Temperature (°C) 22.3 Liquid Temperature (°C) 22.2 GSM850 Head SAR Date January 2, 2007 Conducted Power(dBm) Traffic Channel Peak Test 1 g SAR Head Position Frequency (W/kg) Channel Before After (MHz) Cheek 836.6 190 32.2 32.2 0.364 Left Tilt 836.6 190 32.2 32.2 0.347 - - - - - Cheek 836.6 190 32.2 32.2 0.358 Tilt 836.6 190 32.2 32.2 0.367 Right Tilt 824.2 128 32.1 32.1 0.385 Tilt 848.8 251 32.0 31.9 0.384

Report File No. : STROS-07-001-A1 Date of Issue : 2007-01-18 Page : 15 / 102 Ambient Temperature (°C) 22.3 Liquid Temperature (°C) 22.1 GPRS/EGPRS850 Body SAR Date January 2, 2007 Conducted Traffic Channel Test Power(dBm) Peak 1 g SAR Mode Position Frequency (W/kg) (MHz) Channel Before After Face Up 824.2 128 32.1 32.1 0.525 GPRS Face Up 836.6 190 32.2 32.2 0.519 Face Up 848.8 251 32.1 32.1 0.565 Face Down 824.2 128 32.0 32.1 0.813 GPRS Face Down 836.6 190 32.2 32.2 0.851 Face Down 848.8 251 32.1 32.1 0.956 EGPRS Face Down 836.6 190 31.5 31.5 0.591 GPRS + BT On Face Down 848.8 251 32.0 32.1 0.918

Report File No. : STROS-07-001-A1 Date of Issue : 2007-01-18 Page : 16 / 102 Ambient Temperature (°C) 22.2 Liquid Temperature (°C) 22.3 GSM1900 Head SAR Date January 3, 2007 Conducted Power(dBm) Traffic Channel Test Peak 1 g SAR Head Position Frequency (W/kg) (MHz) Channel Before After Cheek 1880 661 30.0 30.1 0.286 Left Tilt 1880 661 29.9 30.0 0.328 - - - - - Cheek 1880 661 30.0 30.0 0.477 Tilt 1880 661 30.0 30.0 0.529 Right Tilt 1850.2 512 29.7 29.6 0.492 Tilt 1909.8 810 29.8 29.8 0.573

Report File No. : STROS-07-001-A1 Date of Issue : 2007-01-18 Page : 17 / 102 Ambient Temperature (°C) 22.3 Liquid Temperature (°C) 22.2 GPRS/EGPRS1900 Body SAR Date January 3, 2007 Conducted Traffic Channel Test Power(dBm) Peak 1 g SAR Mode Position Frequency (W/kg) (MHz) Channel Before After Face Up 1850.2 512 29.6 29.6 0.420 GPRS Face Up 1880 661 30.0 30.0 0.444 Face Up 1909.8 810 29.8 29.7 0.537 Face Down 1850.2 512 29.7 29.6 0.210 GPRS Face Down 1880 661 30.0 30.0 0.189 Face Down 1909.8 810 29.8 29.8 0.210 EGPRS Face Up 1880 661 29.4 29.4 0.439 GPRS + BT On Face Up 1909.8 810 29.7 29.8 0.514

Report File No. : STROS-07-001-A1 Date of Issue : 2007-01-18 Page : 18 / 102 Ambient Temperature (°C) 22.3 Liquid Temperature (°C) 22.3 WLAN Body SAR Date January 4, 2007 Conducted Traffic Channel Test Power(dBm) Peak 1 g SAR Mode Position Frequency (W/kg) (MHz) Channel Before After Face Up 2412 1 15.87 15.90 0.070 11b (11 Mbps) Face Up 2437 6 16.48 16.45 0.067 Face Up 2462 11 17.04 17.06 0.088 11g (54 Mbps) Face Up 2437 6 17.41 17.50 0.036 Face Down 2412 1 15.90 15.96 0.051 11b (11 Mbps) Face Down 2437 6 16.50 16.52 0.069 Face Down 2462 11 17.05 17.01 0.075 11b(11 Mbps)+ BT ON Face Up 2462 11 17.10 17.04 0.071

Report File No. : STROS-07-001-A1 Date of Issue : 2007-01-18 Page : 19 / 102 Appendix List Appendix A Photographs - EUT - Test Setup Appendix B DASY4 Report - 835, 1900, 2450 MHz (Plots of the SAR Measurements) Validation Test - GSM850 Test - GSM1900 Test - WLAN Test Appendix C Uncertainty Analysis Appendix D Calibration Certificate - PROBE - DAE - DIPOLE

Report File No. : STROS-07-001-A1 Date of Issue : 2007-01-18 Page : 20 / 102 Appendix A EUT Photographs Front View of EUT GSM Anttena Bluetooth Antenna WLAN Antenna Inside View of EUT

Report File No. : STROS-07-001-A1 Date of Issue : 2007-01-18 Page : 21 / 102 Rear View of EUT Right View of EUT

Report File No. : STROS-07-001-A1 Date of Issue : 2007-01-18 Page : 22 / 102 Left View of EUT Top View of EUT

Report File No. : STROS-07-001-A1 Date of Issue : 2007-01-18 Page : 23 / 102 Bottom View of EUT

Report File No. : STROS-07-001-A1 Date of Issue : 2007-01-18 Page : 24 / 102 Test Setup Photographs Left Cheek Position Left Tilt Position

Report File No. : STROS-07-001-A1 Date of Issue : 2007-01-18 Page : 25 / 102 Right Cheek Position Right Tilt Position

Report File No. : STROS-07-001-A1 Date of Issue : 2007-01-18 Page : 26 / 102 Body Face Up Position Body Face Down Position


Document Created: 2007-01-18 20:16:33
Document Modified: 2007-01-18 20:16:33
© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC