RF Exposure SAR 2

FCC ID: QOB99000

RF Exposure Info

Download: PDF
FCCID_708788

Report No. : ES/2006/90001 Page : 1 of 19 Contents APPENDIX 1. Photographs of Test Setup 02 2. Photographs of EUT 06 4. Probe Calibration certificate 08 5. Uncertainty Analysis 17 6. Phantom description 18 7. System Validation from Original equipment supplier 19

Report No. : ES/2006/90001 Page : 2 of 19 Photographs of Test Setup Fig.1 Photograph of the SAR measurement System 2450MHz 15 cm Fig.2 Photograph of the Tissue Simulate Fluid liquid depth 15cm for Flat phantom

Report No. : ES/2006/90001 Page : 3 of 19 Fig.3 Photo of the Notebook and the top of EUT contact to the Flat phantom, Spacing between EUT and phantom –In contact (0mm) Touch 1.0cm Fig.4 Photo of the Notebook and the top of EUT contact to the Flat phantom, Spacing between EUT and phantom –In contact (0mm), Spacing between Antenna and phantom –In contact (1.0cm)

Report No. : ES/2006/90001 Page : 4 of 19 Bottom face to the flat phantom Fig.5 Photo of the Bottom face of the notebook is paralleled with flat Phantom, Antenna is in Vertical direction and Spacing between EUT and phantom – In contact (0.5cm) 0.5cm Fig.6 Photo of the Bottom face of the notebook is paralleled with flat Phantom, Antenna is in Vertical direction and Spacing between EUT and phantom – In contact (0.5cm)

Report No. : ES/2006/90001 Page : 5 of 19 Bottom face to the flat phantom Fig.7 Photo of the Bottom face of the notebook is paralleled with flat Phantom, Antenna is in Horizontal direction and Spacing between EUT and phantom – In contact (0.5cm) 0.5cm Fig.8 Photo of the Bottom face of the notebook is paralleled with flat Phantom, Antenna is in Horizontal direction and Spacing between EUT and phantom – In contact (0.5cm)

Report No. : ES/2006/90001 Page : 6 of 19 Photographs of the EUT the Antenna is in horizontal direction Fig.9 With IBM ThinkPad T43 USB Host slot the Antenna tip upward Fig.10 With IBM ThinkPad T43 USB Host slot

Report No. : ES/2006/90001 Page : 7 of 19 Fig.11 Front view of EUT Fig.12 Back view of EUT

Report No. : ES/2006/90001 Page : 8 of 19 Probe Calibration certificate

Calibration Laboratory of Schweizerschor Kallbrersianst 0o a Schmid & Partner Service suisse @‘italonnage Engineering AG Servio sviezero dtaraturn ‘Zeughausstrasse 4, 8004 Zorich, Swtzeriand Swiss Caltration Service Accrndted by ha Swiss Federal Offce of Metslagy and Accredtaton Aecredtation No.: SCS 108 "The Swiss Accredtation Service is one ofthe aignatories to the EA Mutiaterl Agreementfo the recognition of callation cortficates Glossary: TSL tissue simulating liquid NORMxy,z sensitivity in free space ConF sensitivity in TSL / NORMxy,z DCP diode compression point Polarization o i rotation around probe axis Polarization 8 8 rotation around an axis that is in the plane normal to probe axis (at measurement center), .e., 3 = 0 is normal to probe axis Calibration is Performed According to the Following Standards: a) IEEE Std 1528—2003, "IEEE Recommended Practice for Determining the Peak Spatial— Averaged Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) in the Human Head from Wireless Communications Devices: Measurement Techniques®, December2003 b) CENELEC EN 50361, "Basic standard for the measurement of Specific Absorption Rate related to human exposure to electromagnetic fields from mobile phones (300 MHz — 3 GHz), July 2001 Methods Applied and Interpretation of Parameters: * NORMx,y,z: Assessed for E—field polarization 8 = (f s 900 MHz in TEM—cell f > 1800 MHz: R22 waveguide). NORMx.y,z are only intermediate values, ie., the uncertainties of NORMxy,z does not effect the E*—field uncertainty inside TSL (see below ConvF). * NORM(Mxy,2= NORMx,y,z * frequency_response (see Frequency Response Chart). This linearization is implemented in DASY4 software versions later than 4.2. The uncertainty of the frequency response is included in the stated uncertainty of ConvF. * DCPxy,z: DCP are numerical linearization parameters assessed based on the data of power sweep (no uncertainty required). DCP does not depend on frequency nor media. * ConvF and Boundary Effect Parameters: Assessed in fat phantom using E—field (or Temperature Transfer Standard for f < 800 MHz) and inside waveguide using analytical field distributions based on power measurements for f > 800 MHz. The same setups are used for assessment of the parameters applied for boundary compensation (alpha, depth) of which typical uncertainty values are given. These parameters are used in DASY4 software to improve probe accuracy close to the boundary. The sensitivity in TSL corresponds to NORMxy,z * ConvF whereby the uncertainty corresponds to that given for ConvF. A frequency dependent ConvF is used in DASY version 4.4 and higher which allows extending the validity from & 50 MHz to + 100 MHz. * Spherical isotropy (3D deviation from isotropy); in a field of low gradients realized using a flat phantom exposed by a patch antenna. * Sensor Offset: The sensor offset corresponds to the offset of virtual measurement center from the probe tip (on probe axis). No tolerance required. Cortficate No: EX3—3626_Aug06 Page 2of9

EX3DV3 SN:3526 August 25, 2006 Probe EX3DV3 SN:3526 Manufactured: March 19, 2004 Last calibrated: May 24, 2004 Recalibrated: August 25, 2006 Calibrated for DASY Systems (Note: non—compatible with DASY2 systm!) Cenificale No: ET3—3526_Augoo Page 3 of0

EX3DV3 SN:3526 August 25, 2006 DASY — Parameters of Probe: EX3DV3 SN:3526 Sensitivity in Free Space® Diode Compression® NormX 0.82 + 10.1% pVi(Vim) peP x as mV Norm¥ 0.87 £ 10.1% pVi(Vim] DoP Y 92 mV Normz 0.85 £ 10.1% pVi(Vim) DCP 2 94 mV Sensitivity in Tissue Simulating Liquid (Conversion Factors) Please see Page 8. Boundary Effect Tsu 800 MHz Typical SAR gradient 5 % per mm Sensor Center to Phantom Surface Distance 3.7 mm 47 mm SAR.) Without Correction Algorthm 210. os SAR ) With Correction Algorthm on o1 Tst 1810 MHz Typical SAR gradient: 10 % por mm Sensor Genter to Phantom Surface Distance 3.7 mm 47 mm SAR, [%] Without Correction Algorthm 15— os SARs. [2] With Correcon Algorthm on os Sensor Offset Probe Tip to Sensor Canter 1 mm (The reported uncertainty of measurement is stated as the standard uncer imeasurement multiplied by the coverage factor k=2, which for a normal distribution (corresponds to a coverageprobability of approximately 95%. * The uncetaintes of NoY.2 d nafctthEid uncerainy inside TSL (sen Page 8 * Numerealincarzaton paremeter uncerainy not equred Centfcate No: ET3—3526_Aug06 Page 4 o9

EX3DV3 SN:3526 August 25, 2006 Frequency Response of E—Field (TEM—Cel 110 EXX, Waveguide: R22) Frequency response (normatized) s & ; s 0s as 0 so 1000 1500 2000 2500 soco (ubte] —s—rem —o—ree Uncertainty of Frequency Response of E—fiold: # 6.3% (k=2) Corifcate No: ET3—3526_Aug06 Page S of9

EX3DV3 SN:3526 August 25, 2006 ing Pattern (¢), 3 = 0° £= 1800 MHz, WG R22 10 os as <>—20 Mtle 04 —m— 100 Mz Error td 3 HiserLELEOTE on io is 62 ~>—600 Mz P 2500 Mite as 4o 18 e Uncertainty of Axial sotropy Assessmont: £ 0.5% (ke2) Corifcate No: ET3—3526_Augo6 Page 6 of0

EX3DV3 SN:3526 August 25, 2006 Dynamic Range f(SARneaq) (Waveguide R22, £= 1800 MHz) neee inputSignal (i¥) m8e meeo !— ‘ * 00001 0001 o01 0.4 1 10 100 SAR {mWWlon] ~#— not compensated ~4~compensated | ‘ SAR ImWem‘] [L222 S Uncertainty of Linearity Assessment: £ 0.6% (k=2) Cerificale No: ET3—2526_Aug06 Page 7 or9

EX3DV3 SN:3526 August 25, 2006 Conversion Factor Assessment 1= 300 Miz, WGLs Ro (head) 1= 1010 Mllz, WGLS R22 (head) 35 s0 $"* & mo * 20 * & & 150 E 15 3 i &3& 00 as 8# 00 0 20 40 so o 20 LJ so z{mm] zimm] —#—Analytcal —>—Measurements ~O—Analytcal ~o—Measurements £bte] _Validty (MHz]® ___tt. Permittivity Conductiviy Alpha _Dopth ConyE Uncertainty a00 +50/2100 Head 41.525% 0.07£5% o21 080 1172 £11.0% (ke2) 1810 +80/2 100 Head 40.05% 140 5% on 1830 8t £11.0% (e2) 1950 £50/2 100 Head 40.0£5% 14025% o1 183 92 £11.0%(e2) 2450 £50/2100 Head 30.25% 1.8028% oa2 080 820 £11.8% (ke2) 800 £s0/2100 Body 55.045% 1.055% oz1. oso ies £11.0%(2) 1810 +50/2 100 Body 53.325% 15225% ore ase 864 £11.0%(c2) 1950 50 /x 100 Body 53.325% 1.5245% 015 dss 926 £11.0%(c—2) 2480 +80/2100 Body 52.745% 105 +5% 040 os2 830 #118%(c2) 5200 £50 /x 100 Body 49.025% 530%5% 045 185 317. 213.1% (ke2) seoo +50/2 100 Body 48.225% 600%5% 2s 185 266 £19.1% (k=2) Thevaldyof 190Mit onl applis for DASY v44 and highor(see Page 2 The unceriintis the RSS ot the Gonveuncertaint at callbraion frequeneyand the uneerilntyfoth nclcatroquency band. Conifcate No: ET3—3526_Augo6 Page 8 or0

EX3DV3 SN:3526 August 25, 2006 Deviation from Isotropy in HSL Error (6, 8), £ =900 MHz Error [9B] Uncertalnty of Sphorical Isotropy Assessment: £ 26% (=2) Cenifcate No: ET3—3526_Aug06 Page 9 of9

Report No. : ES/2006/90001 Page : 17 of 19 Uncertainty Analysis

Report No. : ES/2006/90001 Page : 18 of 19 Phantom description

Report No. : ES/2006/90001 Page : 19 of 19 System Validation from Original equipment supplier SPEAG Schmid & Partner of 2450MHz Muscle


Document Created: 2006-09-18 22:52:23
Document Modified: 2006-09-18 22:52:23
© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC