Near Field Measurement Report Revised

FCC ID: PD913110NG

RF Exposure Info

Download: PDF
FCCID_3838328

TEST REPORT EUT Description Wireless Module installed in Virtual Reality (VR) HMDA Brand Name Intel® Model 13110NGW inside HTC VIVE , model 2Q4L100 Model Name 13110NGW FCC/IC ID FCC ID: PD913110NG / IC ID: 1000M-13110NG Date of Test Start/End 2018-02-28 / 2018-03-02 WiGig Features (see section 5) Applicant Intel Mobile Communications Address 100 Center Point Circle, Suite 200 / Columbia, SC 29210 / United States Contact Person Steven Hackett Telephone/Fax/ Email steven.c.hackett@intel.com FCC 47 CFR Part §2.1093 Reference Standards FCC 47 CFR Part §15.255(g) (see section 1) RF Exposure Environment Portable devices - General population/uncontrolled exposure Test Report identification 180215-01.TR01 Rev. 01.2 Revision Control This test report revision replaces any previous test report revision (see section 8) The test results relate only to the samples tested. The test report shall not be reproduced in full, without written approval of the laboratory. Intel Mobile Communications France S.A.S – WRF Lab 425 rue de Goa – Le Cargo B6 - 06600, Antibes, France Tel. +33493001400 / Fax +33493001401 FO-011_TestReport161122 1 of 25 Printed copies are not controlled documents

Test Report N° 180215-01.TR01 Rev. 01 Table of Contents 1. Standards, reference documents and applicable test methods ......................................................................... 3 2. General conditions, competences and guarantees ............................................................................................. 3 3. Environmental Conditions ...................................................................................................................................... 3 4. Test samples ............................................................................................................................................................ 3 5. EUT Features ............................................................................................................................................................ 3 6. Remarks and comments ......................................................................................................................................... 4 7. Associated Documents ........................................................................................................................................... 4 8. Document Revision History .................................................................................................................................... 4 Test & System Description ....................................................................................................................... 5 A.1 POWER DENSITY DEFINITION ................................................................................................................................. 5 A.2 SPEAG FREE SPACE MEASUREMENT SYSTEM ....................................................................................................... 5 A.2.1 Measurement Setup .................................................................................................................................................... 5 A.2.2 E-Field Measurement Probe ........................................................................................................................................ 6 A.2.3 Worst Case Linearization Error .................................................................................................................................... 7 A.2.4 Data Evaluation ........................................................................................................................................................... 8 A.3 SYSTEM CHECK .................................................................................................................................................... 9 A.4 TEST EQUIPMENT LIST ........................................................................................................................................ 10 A.4.1 System #2.................................................................................................................................................................. 10 A.4.2 Shared Equipment ..................................................................................................................................................... 10 A.5 MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY EVALUATION ......................................................................................................... 11 Test Results ............................................................................................................................................. 12 B.1 TEST CONDITIONS............................................................................................................................................... 12 B.1.1 Test signal, Output power and Test Frequencies ...................................................................................................... 12 B.1.2 Measurement configuration ....................................................................................................................................... 12 B.2 SYSTEM CHECK MEASUREMENTS ........................................................................................................................ 12 B.3 TEST RESULTS ................................................................................................................................................... 13 Test System Plots.................................................................................................................................... 14 Photographs ............................................................................................................................................ 23 D.1 TEST SETUP ....................................................................................................................................................... 23 D.2 TEST SAMPLE ..................................................................................................................................................... 24 Calibration Certificates ........................................................................................................................... 25 FO-011_TestReport161122 2 of 25 Printed copies are not controlled documents

Test Report N° 180215-01.TR01 Rev. 01 1. Standards, reference documents and applicable test methods 1. FCC 47 CFR Part §2.1093 – Radiofrequency radiation exposure evaluation: portable devices. 2. FCC 47 CFR Part 15 – Subpart C – §15.255 Operation within the band 57-64 GHz. 3. SPEAG Application Note – 5G Compliance Testing with DASY6 (5GModule V1.0Beta) 2. General conditions, competences and guarantees  Intel Mobile Communications France SAS Wireless RF Lab (Intel WRF Lab) is a testing laboratory competent to perform this testing.  Intel WRF Lab only provides testing services and is committed to providing reliable, unbiased test results and interpretations.  Intel WRF Lab is liable to the client for the maintenance of the confidentiality of all information related to the item under test and the results of the test.  Intel WRF Lab has developed calibration and proficiency programs for its measurement equipment to ensure correlated and reliable results to its customers.  This report is only referred to the item that has undergone the test.  This report does not imply an approval of the product by the Certification Bodies or competent Authorities. 3. Environmental Conditions  At the site where the measurements were performed the following limits were not exceeded during the tests: Temperature 21ºC ± 1ºC Humidity 30% ± 10% 4. Test samples Sample Control # Description Model Serial # Date of receipt Note 180215-01.S01 VR HMDA 2Q4L100 E230068-INT 2018-02-15 NA #01 180215-01.S03 Power Bank NA NA 2018-02-15 NA 5. EUT Features Brand Name Intel® Model 13110 inside VR HMDA Model 2Q4L100 Model Name 13110NGW FCC/IC ID FCC: PD913110NG/ IC: 1000M-13110NG Software Version V4.0.10289.11 Prototype / Production Production Host Identification HTC VIVE series, model 2Q4L100 Exposure Conditions Free space power density Supported Radios WiGig 60GHz (57.24 – 63.72 GHz) Antenna Information RFEM3 (10101RRFW) FO-011_TestReport161122 3 of 25 Printed copies are not controlled documents

Test Report N° 180215-01.TR01 Rev. 01 6. Remarks and comments 1. Per the location of the active antenna array (a.k.a. RFEM3) in the VR HMDA model HTC 2Q4L100 platform, the distance between the antenna arrays to the body of an end user, at the closest contact point, will be in the near-field. 2. The determination of the near-field average power density is performed using an EM simulation and a near-field measurement. An EM simulation that includes the RFEM 3 transmitter model embedded inside the VR HMDA model HTC VIVE is used to determine the worst case configuration and the correspondent near-field power density. The simulation method is described in associated document [2]. The comparison between simulation and measurement are described in document [3]. 3. The worst-case’s power density found in simulation is supported by performing the E-field measurement in the near-field using SPEAG system. The measurement system and test results are presented in this report. 4. Previous filings for similar devices (PD9, RFEM) showed on order of 3 dB differences when only the normal component of the Poynting vector was used to determine power density, vs. using all three vector components. In this filing, the simulations used three components of the Poynting vector (consistent with FCC procedures), whereas the version of the measurement system available at this time used only the normal component to determine maximum power density results. Intel is collaborating with the measurement system vendor so that future filings for similar devices may use other methods for power density calculations, and as consistent with technical considerations in the IEEE/IEC measurement standards working group. The highest reported power density results (0.553 mW/cm^2 simulated, 0.497 mW/cm^2; 11% relative difference) are on the order of half of the FCC limit (1 mW/cm^2). Additional margins for RF exposure compliance are provided by that the evaluations planes are selected relatively close to the device enclosure at 9.3 mm spacing, with closest portions of user's head at 12.1 mm. 7.0 Document Revision History Revision # Date Modified by Revision Details Rev. 00 2018-03-02 First Issue T. ANDRIAMIHARIVOLAMENA K. RIDA Rev. 01 2018-04-04 K. RIDA Revision 01 according to FCC questions 7. Associated Documents [1] 180215-VR HMDA HTC 2Q4L100- Theory of Operation Report [2] 180215-VR HMDA HTC 2Q4L100 - MPE Simulation Report [3] 180215-VR HMDA HTC 2Q4L100 - Simulations and Measurements Comparisons and Compliance Descriptions Report FO-011_TestReport161122 4 of 25 Printed copies are not controlled documents

Test Report N° 180215-01.TR01 Rev. 01 Test & System Description A.1 Power Density Definition The power density for an electromagnetic field represents the rate of energy transfer per unit area. The local power density (i.e. Poynting vector) at a given spatial point is deduced from electromagnetic fields by the following formula: 1 ⃗⃗⃗⃗⃗⃗⃗⃗⃗⃗ 𝑃𝑙𝑜𝑐𝑎𝑙 = Re ( 𝐸⃗ × 𝐻⃗ ∗) 2 Where 𝐸⃗ is the complex electric field peak phasor and 𝐻 ⃗ ∗ is the complex conjugate magnetic field peak phasor. This power density is also called “single-point” or “spot power density”. Considering that the FCC’s Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) limit is applicable on the average power density inside 1cm2 area, the single point power densities in the evaluation plane should be averaged inside the 1cm 2 area. A.2 SPEAG free space Measurement System A.2.1 Measurement Setup The DASY6 system for performing compliance tests consists of the following items:  A standard high precision 6-axis robot (Staübli TX/RX family) with controller, teach pendant and software. It includes an arm extension for accommodating the data acquisition electronics (DAE)  An mm-wave E-field probe optimized and calibrated for the targeted measurements.  A data acquisition electronics (DAE) which performs the signal amplification, signal multiplexing, AD-conversion, offset measurements, mechanical surface detection, collision detection, etc. The unit is battery powered with standard or rechargeable batteries. The signal is optically transmitted to the EOC.  The Electro-optical Converter (EOC) performs the conversion from optical to electrical signals for the digital communication to the DAE. The EOC signal is transmitted to the measurement server.  The function of the measurement server is to perform the time critical tasks such as signal filtering, control of the robot operation and fast movements interrupts.  The Light Beam used is for probe alignment. This improves the (absolute) accuracy of the probe positioning.  A computer running Win7 professional operating system and the cDASY6 software.  Remote control and teach pendant as well as additional circuitry for robot safety such as warning lamps, etc. FO-011_TestReport161122 5 of 25 Printed copies are not controlled documents

Test Report N° 180215-01.TR01 Rev. 01 A.2.2 E-Field Measurement Probe The probe consists of two dipoles (0.8 mm length) optimally arranged with different angles (γ1 and γ2) to obtain pseudo- vector information, printed on glass substrate protected by high density foam that allows low perturbation of the measured field. Three or more measurements are taken for different probe rotational angles, deriving the amplitude and polarization information. The probe’s characteristics are: Frequency Range 750 MHz – 110 GHz1 Length 320 mm Probe tip external diameter 8 mm Probe’s two dipoles length 0.9mm – Diode loaded Quartz 0.9 x 20 x 0.18mm Probe’s substrate (𝜀r=3.8) Distance between diode sensors 1.5 mm and probe’s tip Axial Isotropy ±0.6 dB Maximum operating E-field 3000 V/m Lower E-field detection threshold 5 V/m @ 60 GHz Minimum Mechanical separation 0.5mm between probe tip and a Surface Calibration reference point Diode Sensor 1 The probe calibration range is 750 MHz – 90 GHz FO-011_TestReport161122 6 of 25 Printed copies are not controlled documents

Test Report N° 180215-01.TR01 Rev. 01 A.2.3 Worst Case Linearization Error For continuously transmitting signals (100% duty cycle), the worst case linearization error is given by the difference between non linearized voltage and linearized voltage using CW parameters. The error is increasing with the voltage levels. In our particular case, the measured voltages averaged over the signal period are below 1mV. We use 1mV in the below calculation to have the worst case condition. The signal PAR (Peak to Average Ratio) is 6dB and the diode compression point 100mV. The maximum voltage through the diode is given by: vpeak = vmeas avg × PARlinear 𝑣𝑝𝑒𝑎𝑘=1∗4=4 𝑚𝑉 The linearized voltage using CW parameter is given by: 2 𝑣𝑝𝑒𝑎𝑘 𝑣𝑙𝑖𝑛 𝑝𝑒𝑎𝑘 = 𝑣𝑝𝑒𝑎𝑘 + 𝑑𝑖𝑜𝑑𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑛𝑡 42 𝑣𝑙𝑖𝑛 𝑝𝑒𝑎𝑘 = 4 + = 4.16 𝑚𝑉 100 The worst case linearization error is: 𝑣𝑙𝑖𝑛 𝑝𝑒𝑎𝑘 4.16 𝑙𝑖𝑛 𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑜𝑟 = = = 1.04 = 4% 𝑣 𝑝𝑒𝑎𝑘 4 FO-011_TestReport161122 7 of 25 Printed copies are not controlled documents

Test Report N° 180215-01.TR01 Rev. 01 A.2.4 Data Evaluation A.2.4.1 Scan The scan involves the measurement of two planes with three different probe rotations. The grid steps are optimized by the software based on the test frequency. The location of the lowest measurement plane is defined by the distance of first measurement layer from device under test (DUT) entered by the user. The DUT location settings can be used to offset the center of the grid. A.2.4.2 Total Field and Power Flux Density Reconstruction Computation of the power density in general requires knowledge of the electric (E-) and magnetic (H-) field amplitudes and phases in the plane of incidence. Reconstruction of these quantities from pseudo-vector E-field measurements is feasible, as they are constrained by Maxwell's equations. The reconstruction algorithm developed by the system manufacturer, together with the ability of the probe to measure extremely close to the source without perturbing the field, permits reconstruction of the E- and H-fields, as well as of the power density, on measurement planes located as near as 0.5mm away in the frequency band of 60 GHz. The average of the reconstructed power density is evaluated over a circular area in each measurement plane. The area of the circle is defined by the user; the default is 1 cm 2. FO-011_TestReport161122 8 of 25 Printed copies are not controlled documents

Test Report N° 180215-01.TR01 Rev. 01 A.3 System Check The system performance check verifies that the system operates within its specifications. It is recommended that the system performance check be performed prior to any usage of the system in order to guarantee reproducible results. The system performance check uses normal E-field measurements in a simplified setup with a well characterized source. This setup was selected to give a high sensitivity to all parameters that might fail or vary over time. The system check does not intend to replace the calibration of the components, but indicates situations where the system uncertainty is exceeded due to drift or failure. In the simplified setup for system check, the EUT is replaced by a calibrated source and the power source is replaced by a controlled continuous wave generated by a signal generator. The calibrated source must be placed at the correct distance from the E-field probe according to the calibration certificate. First, the power meter is connected to the output of the signal generator to measure the forward power at the location of the connector to the system check source. The signal generator is adjusted for the desired forward power to match the system check source calibration setup at the connector as read by power meter. Then the power meter is replaced by the system check source. The output power on the reference source is set to 5.0 dBm (3.16 mW) and E-field results are normalized to a forward power of 10mW to compare the values with the calibration report. FO-011_TestReport161122 9 of 25 Printed copies are not controlled documents

Test Report N° 180215-01.TR01 Rev. 01 A.4 Test Equipment List A.4.1 System #2 ID# Device Type/Model Serial # Manufacturer Cal. Date Cal. Due Date E-field mm-Wave 0575 EUmmWV2 9354 SPEAG 2017-05-08 2018-05-08 Probe 0628 6-axis Robot TX60 L F17/RCB1/A/01 STAÜBLI NA NA Robot Remote P/N: SE UMS 032 0631 NA STAÜBLI NA NA Control AA Measurement 0632 Server SE UMS 028 BB 1547 SPEAG NA NA Electro-Optical 0633 EOC60 1104 SPEAG NA NA Converter 5G Phantom table 0635 Table NA SPEAG NA NA professional 0636 Light Beam Unit LB5 / 80 1030 Di-Soric NA NA cDASY6 5G 0638 Measurement SW module 9-5ED1AC01 SPEAG NA NA v1.0.0.12565 Data Acquisition 0605 DAE4 1517 SPEAG 2017-05-24 2018-05-24 Electronics 0658 5G Phantom 5G NA SPEAG NA NA A.4.2 Shared Equipment ID# Device Type/Model Serial # Manufacturer Cal. Date Cal. Due Date 0012 Power Meter NRP2 101567 R&S N/A N/A 0014 Power Sensor NRP-Z57 101280 R&S 2017-04-25 2019-04-25 0309 Signal Generator SMB100A 178217 R&S 2017-03-15 2019-03-15 Frequency Multiplier, 0427 SMZ75 101257 R&S N/A N/A 50GHz-75GHz Temperature & RA12E-TH1- 0586 RA12-B9BD70 AVTECH 2017-11-27 2019-11-27 Humidity Logger RAS 0590 Horn reference source PE9881-24 37/2016 Pasternack 2017-05-08 2019-05-08 FO-011_TestReport161122 10 of 25 Printed copies are not controlled documents

Test Report N° 180215-01.TR01 Rev. 01 A.5 Measurement Uncertainty Evaluation The system uncertainty evaluation is shown in the below table: Uncertainty Budget (28 - 90 GHz range) Error Description Uncertainty Probability Div. (ci) Std. Unc. (vi) Value Distribution (±dB) veff (±dB) Measurement System Probe Calibration 0.43 N 1 1 0.43 ∞ Hemispherical Isotropy 0.60 R √3 1 0.35 ∞ Linearity 0.20 R √3 1 0.12 ∞ System Detection Limits 0.04 R √3 1 0.02 ∞ Modulation Response* 0.17 R √3 1 0.10 ∞ Readout Electronics 0.01 N 1 1 0.01 ∞ Response Time 0.03 R √3 1 0.02 ∞ Integration Time 0.11 R √3 1 0.06 ∞ RF Ambient Noise 0.04 R √3 1 0.02 ∞ RF Ambient Reflections 0.21 R √3 1 0.12 ∞ Probe Positioner 0.04 R √3 1 0.02 ∞ Probe Positioning 0.11 R √3 1 0.06 ∞ Savg Reconstruction 0.61 R √3 1 0.35 ∞ Test Sample Related Power Drift 0.57 R √3 1 0.33 ∞ Power Scaling 0.00 R √3 1 0.00 ∞ Combined Std. Uncertainty 0.77 ∞ Expanded Std. Uncertainty 1.54 * The modulation response contribution in A.5 is calculated according to 4% linearization error of A.2.3 by: Uncertainty Modulation Response (dB)= 10log(1+0.04)= 0.17 FO-011_TestReport161122 11 of 25 Printed copies are not controlled documents

Test Report N° 180215-01.TR01 Rev. 01 Test Results B.1 Test Conditions B.1.1 Test signal, Output power and Test Frequencies The device under test was an Intel 13110NGW WiGig module (FCC ID: PD918265NG), including an active antenna array, embedded inside the VR HMDA model HTC VIVE. The device was put into operation by using an Intel proprietary software (DRTU version V4.0.10289.11). B.1.2 Measurement configuration The measurements were performed in multiple evaluation planes (see Annex E) for the 6 worst cases power density shown in table below, and calculated among the 72 worst cases presented in [2]. Plane MCS index 1 Scan Plane Subset Channel Worst-case position @ Duty Cycle size [cm2] MCS 1 Case #1 EpB 3 1 1 3.73x3.73 @ 100% MCS 1 Case #2 EpB 3 2 1 3.73x3.73 @ 100% MCS 1 Case #3 EpA 2 3 1 3.73x3.73 @ 100% MCS 1 Case #4 EpA1 1 1 1 3.73x3.73 @ 100% MCS 1 Case #5 EpB1 1 1 1 3.73x3.73 @ 100% MCS 1 Case #6 EpB1 1 2 1 3.73x3.73 @ 100% B.2 System Check Measurements Target E-field 2 Measured E-field 2 Deviation Frequency Signal Type Date (V/m) (V/m) (%) 60 GHz Continuous Wave 90.3 93.18 3.19 2018-03-01 The fields presented in the System Check Measurements table are RMS values normalized to 10 mW input power. As indicated in the calibration certificate of the reference horn antenna (see Annex F), the maximum measured E-field value at 10 mm is 67.91 V/m with 7.53 dBm (5.66 mW) source power. This is equivalent to 90.3 V/m target E-field value showed in the table above normalized to 10 dBm (10 mW) source power. The system check measurement is performed at 5.0 dBm3 (3.16 mW) source power. The maximum measured E-field value is 52.4 V/m (see plot 7 in Annex C). This is equivalent to 93.18 V/m measured E-field value showed in the table above and normalized to 10 dBm source power. 1 MCS1 Modulation and coding scheme uses π/2-BPSK modulation 2 Normalized to 10mW 3 The maximum available power level of the mmW source is around 5.5 dBm. FO-011_TestReport161122 12 of 25 Printed copies are not controlled documents

Test Report N° 180215-01.TR01 Rev. 01 B.3 Test Results Max localized Spatially Evaluation Max E-Field Max H-Field Test case PD Averaged PD Plot # plane [V/m] [A/m] [mW/cm2] [mW/cm2] Case #1 EpB 136.794 0.415 2.697 0.754 1 Case #2 EpB 138.181 0.534 2.680 0.903 2 Case #3 EpA 107.186 0.419 1.567 0.807 3 Case #4 EpA1 109.482 0.408 1.967 0.540 4 Case #5 EpB1 135.105 0.462 2.488 0.853 5 Case #6 EpB1 156.873 0.438 2.652 0.950 6 All field’ strengths shown in the table are peak values. FO-011_TestReport161122 13 of 25 Printed copies are not controlled documents

Test Report N° 180215-01.TR01 Rev. 01 Test System Plots 1. Case # 1 – 0 mm distance from Evaluation plane .............................................................................................. 15 2. Case # 2 – 0 mm distance from Evaluation plane .............................................................................................. 16 3. Case # 3 – 0 mm distance from Evaluation plane .............................................................................................. 17 4. Case # 4 – 0 mm distance from Evaluation plane .............................................................................................. 18 5. Case # 5 – 0 mm distance from Evaluation plane .............................................................................................. 19 6. Case # 6 – 0 mm distance from Evaluation plane .............................................................................................. 20 7. System Check 60 GHz ........................................................................................................................................... 21 FO-011_TestReport161122 14 of 25 Printed copies are not controlled documents

Test Report N° 180215-01.TR01 Rev. 01 1. Case # 1 – 0 mm distance from Evaluation plane DUT: Sample 180215-01.S01; Type: HTC VIVE VR-HMDA; Serial: E230068-INT Communication System: UID 0, Wi-Gig (0); Communication System Band: 60 GHz; Frequency: 58320MHz; Communication System PAR: 0 dB Medium parameters used: σ = 0 S/m, εr = 1; ρ = 0 kg/m3 Phantom section: Table Section Measurement Standard: DASY6 (IEEE/IEC/ANSI C63.19-2011) DASY Configuration:  Probe: EUmmW - SN9354; ConvF(1, 1, 1); Calibrated: 2017-05-08; o Modulation Compensation:  Sensor-Surface: 0mm (Fix Surface), z = 0 mm  Electronics: DAE4 Sn1517; Calibrated: 2017-05-24  Phantom: Cover; Type: SPEAG Phantom Cover;  cDASY6 5G Module V1.0.0.12565; Sub-array: 3 Channel: 1 Distance: 0mm Sample: 180215-01.S01 Scan area / Resolution: [37.3x37.3] mm2 / 1.3 mm Evaluation plane: EpB Measured E-field Reconstructed H-field (from Measured E-field) Maximum value = 136.794 V/m - Peak Maximum value = 0.415 A/m - Peak Reconstructed localized free space power density Reconstructed Spatially Averaged power density Maximum value = 2.697 mW/cm2 Maximum value = 0.754 mW/cm2 FO-011_TestReport161122 15 of 25 Printed copies are not controlled documents

Test Report N° 180215-01.TR01 Rev. 01 2. Case # 2 – 0 mm distance from Evaluation plane DUT: Sample 180215-01.S01; Type: HTC VIVE VR-HMDA; Serial: E230068-INT Communication System: UID 0, Wi-Gig (0); Communication System Band: 60 GHz; Frequency: 60480MHz; Communication System PAR: 0 dB Medium parameters used: σ = 0 S/m, εr = 1; ρ = 0 kg/m3 Phantom section: Table Section Measurement Standard: DASY6 (IEEE/IEC/ANSI C63.19-2011) DASY Configuration:  Probe: EUmmW - SN9354; ConvF(1, 1, 1); Calibrated: 2017-05-08; o Modulation Compensation:  Sensor-Surface: 0mm (Fix Surface), z = 0 mm  Electronics: DAE4 Sn1517; Calibrated: 2017-05-24  Phantom: Cover; Type: SPEAG Phantom Cover;  cDASY6 5G Module V1.0.0.12565; Sub-array: 3 Channel: 2 Distance: 0mm Sample: 180215-01.S01 Scan area / Resolution: [37.3x37.3] mm 2 / 1.24 mm Evaluation plane: EpB Measured E-field Reconstructed H-field (from Measured E-field) Maximum value = 138.181 V/m - Peak Maximum value = 0.534 A/m - Peak Reconstructed localized free space power density Reconstructed Spatially Averaged power density Maximum value = 2.680 mW/cm2 Maximum value = 0.903 mW/cm2 FO-011_TestReport161122 16 of 25 Printed copies are not controlled documents

Test Report N° 180215-01.TR01 Rev. 01 3. Case # 3 – 0 mm distance from Evaluation plane DUT: Sample 180215-01.S01; Type: HTC VIVE VR-HMDA; Serial: E230068-INT Communication System: UID 0, Wi-Gig (0); Communication System Band: 60 GHz; Frequency: 62640MHz; Communication System PAR: 0 dB Medium parameters used: σ = 0 S/m, εr = 1; ρ = 0 kg/m3 Phantom section: Table Section Measurement Standard: DASY6 (IEEE/IEC/ANSI C63.19-2011) DASY Configuration:  Probe: EUmmW - SN9354; ConvF(1, 1, 1); Calibrated: 2017-05-08; o Modulation Compensation:  Sensor-Surface: 0mm (Fix Surface), z = 0 mm  Electronics: DAE4 Sn1517; Calibrated: 2017-05-24  Phantom: Cover; Type: SPEAG Phantom Cover;  cDASY6 5G Module V1.0.0.12565; Sub-array: 2 Channel: 3 Distance: 0mm Sample: 180215-01.S01 Scan area / Resolution: [37.3x37.3] mm 2 / 1.19 mm Evaluation plane: EpA Measured E-field Reconstructed H-field (from Measured E-field) Maximum value = 107.186 V/m - Peak Maximum value = 0.419 A/m - Peak Reconstructed localized free space power density Reconstructed Spatially Averaged power density Maximum value = 1.567 mW/cm2 Maximum value = 0.807 mW/cm2 FO-011_TestReport161122 17 of 25 Printed copies are not controlled documents

Test Report N° 180215-01.TR01 Rev. 01 4. Case # 4 – 0 mm distance from Evaluation plane DUT: Sample 180215-01.S01; Type: HTC VIVE VR-HMDA; Serial: E230068-INT Communication System: UID 0, Wi-Gig (0); Communication System Band: 60 GHz; Frequency: 58320MHz; Communication System PAR: 0 dB Medium parameters used: σ = 0 S/m, εr = 1; ρ = 0 kg/m3 Phantom section: Table Section Measurement Standard: DASY6 (IEEE/IEC/ANSI C63.19-2011) DASY Configuration:  Probe: EUmmW - SN9354; ConvF(1, 1, 1); Calibrated: 2017-05-08; o Modulation Compensation:  Sensor-Surface: 0mm (Fix Surface), z = 0 mm  Electronics: DAE4 Sn1517; Calibrated: 2017-05-24  Phantom: Cover; Type: SPEAG Phantom Cover;  cDASY6 5G Module V1.0.0.12565; Sub-array: 1 Channel: 1 Distance: 0mm Sample: 180215-01.S01 Scan area / Resolution: [37.3x37.3] mm 2 / 1.29 mm Evaluation plane: EpA1 Measured E-field Reconstructed H-field (from Measured E-field) Maximum value = 109.482 V/m - Peak Maximum value = 0.408 A/m - Peak Reconstructed localized free space power density Reconstructed Spatially Averaged power density Maximum value = 1.967 mW/cm2 Maximum value = 0.540 mW/cm2 FO-011_TestReport161122 18 of 25 Printed copies are not controlled documents

Test Report N° 180215-01.TR01 Rev. 01 5. Case # 5 – 0 mm distance from Evaluation plane DUT: Sample 180215-01.S01; Type: HTC VIVE VR-HMDA; Serial: E230068-INT Communication System: UID 0, Wi-Gig (0); Communication System Band: 60 GHz; Frequency: 58320MHz; Communication System PAR: 0 dB Medium parameters used: σ = 0 S/m, εr = 1; ρ = 0 kg/m3 Phantom section: Table Section Measurement Standard: DASY6 (IEEE/IEC/ANSI C63.19-2011) DASY Configuration:  Probe: EUmmW - SN9354; ConvF(1, 1, 1); Calibrated: 2017-05-08; o Modulation Compensation:  Sensor-Surface: 0mm (Fix Surface), z = 0 mm  Electronics: DAE4 Sn1517; Calibrated: 2017-05-24  Phantom: Cover; Type: SPEAG Phantom Cover;  cDASY6 5G Module V1.0.0.12565; Sub-array: 1 Channel: 1 Distance: 0mm Sample: 180215-01.S01 Scan area / Resolution: [37.3x37.3] mm 2 / 1.29 mm Evaluation plane: EpB1 Measured E-field Reconstructed H-field (from Measured E-field) Maximum value = 135.105 V/m - Peak Maximum value = 0.462 A/m - Peak Reconstructed localized free space power density Reconstructed Spatially Averaged power density Maximum value = 2.488 mW/cm2 Maximum value = 0.853 mW/cm2 FO-011_TestReport161122 19 of 25 Printed copies are not controlled documents

Test Report N° 180215-01.TR01 Rev. 01 6. Case # 6 – 0 mm distance from Evaluation plane DUT: Sample 180215-01.S01; Type: HTC VIVE VR-HMDA; Serial: E230068-INT Communication System: UID 0, Wi-Gig (0); Communication System Band: 60 GHz; Frequency: 60480 MHz; Communication System PAR: 0 dB Medium parameters used: σ = 0 S/m, εr = 1; ρ = 0 kg/m3 Phantom section: Table Section Measurement Standard: DASY6 (IEEE/IEC/ANSI C63.19-2011) DASY Configuration:  Probe: EUmmW - SN9354; ConvF(1, 1, 1); Calibrated: 2017-05-08; o Modulation Compensation:  Sensor-Surface: 0mm (Fix Surface), z = 0 mm  Electronics: DAE4 Sn1517; Calibrated: 2017-05-24  Phantom: Cover; Type: SPEAG Phantom Cover;  cDASY6 5G Module V1.0.0. 12565; Sub-array: 1 Channel: 2 Distance: 0mm Sample: 180215-01.S01 Scan area / Resolution: [37.3x37.3] mm 2 / 1.24 mm Evaluation plane: EpB1 Measured E-field Reconstructed H-field (from Measured E-field) Maximum value = 156.873 V/m - Peak Maximum value = 0.438 A/m - Peak Reconstructed localized free space power density Reconstructed Spatially Averaged power density Maximum value = 2.652 mW/cm2 Maximum value = 0.950 mW/cm2 FO-011_TestReport161122 20 of 25 Printed copies are not controlled documents

Test Report N° 180215-01.TR01 Rev. 01 7. System Check 60 GHz DUT: Horn reference source; Type: PE9881-24; Serial: 201715 Communication System: UID 0, Wi-Gig (0); Communication System Band: 60 GHz; Frequency: 60000 MHz; Communication System PAR: 0 dB Medium parameters used: σ = 0 S/m, εr = 1; ρ = 0 kg/m3 Phantom section: Table Section Measurement Standard: DASY6 (IEEE/IEC/ANSI C63.19-2011) DASY Configuration:  Probe: EUmmW - SN9354 ; ConvF(1, 1, 1); Calibrated: 2017-05-08; o Modulation Compensation:  Sensor-Surface: 0mm (Fix Surface), z = 10 mm  Electronics: DAE4 Sn1517; Calibrated: 2017-05-24  Phantom: Cover; Type: SPEAG Phantom Cover;  cDASY6 5G Module V1.0.0. 12565; Distance-10mm/Measure Horn reference source (43.7x43.7): Resolution = 1.25 mm Maximum value measured: 52.3 V/m (RMS) for 5 dBm input power. The plots below show the comparison between the calibration certificate and the system check results in terms of normalized E-field distribution and the 1D variation along the two axis of the maximum. FO-011_TestReport161122 21 of 25 Printed copies are not controlled documents

Test Report N° 180215-01.TR01 Rev. 01 Calibration Certificate System Check - scan area: 30 mm x 16 mm - scan area:30 mm x 16 mm - Resolution: 1 mm - Resolution: 1.25 mm Field variation through the maximum along the E-field polarization Field variation through the maximum along the H-field polarization FO-011_TestReport161122 22 of 25 Printed copies are not controlled documents

Test Report N° 180215-01.TR01 Rev. 01 Photographs D.1 Test Setup Evaluation plane Position Measurement Setup EpB evaluation plane EpB1 evaluation plane FO-011_TestReport161122 23 of 25 Printed copies are not controlled documents

Test Report N° 180215-01.TR01 Rev. 01 D.2 Test Sample Sample #01 VR HMDA and Power Bank – Top view VR HMDA - Bottom view FO-011_TestReport161122 24 of 25 Printed copies are not controlled documents

Test Report N° 180215-01.TR01 Rev. 01 Calibration Certificates ID Device Type/Model Serial Number Manufacturer E-field mm-Wave 0575 EUmmWV2 9354 SPEAG Probe Horn reference 0590 PE9881-24 201715 Pasternack source Calibration certificates are in attachment FO-011_TestReport161122 25 of 25 Printed copies are not controlled documents


Document Created: 2018-05-03 14:28:00
Document Modified: 2018-05-03 14:28:00
© 2025 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC