Sar report II

FCC ID: P4MAGT100D

Test Report

Download: PDF
FCCID_698537

ET3DVS SN:1604 May 2, 2006 Deviation from Isotropy in HSL Error (6, 8),£=900 MHz Error 91 wiss as m es om m om—o0 ow m mo on messem momom sowomw momom mersic Uncartainty o Spheriea Isctropy Assossmontx 26% (rez) Centcai n 131008woyos raescto

NCL CALIBRATION LABORATORIES Calibration File No: DC—0267 Project Number: BACL—CAL2450—3985 CERTIFICATE OF CALIBRATION Is ourthed thatthe eqvipment idaifed below has beon caltrate in the wct catimration LABORATORIES by quaied personne falowng recognized proceturesand using uanster tandantstracentle t NRCAIET BACL vaidaton Dipsle Manstactrer: APREL Laboratores Partnumber 0—100—5—1 Frequeney: 1000 it Stal No:Bct—0r9 Customer Bay Area Complance Laborttoy Caltrated:4" March 2005 Rteased on. 4" March 2008 Reteased Oy seecrmmnmay Ovennotrentttas ferows outime Tee en es Emwon rae e in ie ons

NCL Calibration Laboratories Divison of APREL Laborators: Conditions Dipole BCL—049 received ‘rom customer, with the attibute of having a repair to one radial arm, in good condition for re—calibration. SMA connector cleaned prior to calibration Ambient Temperature of the Laboratory: 22°C +0.5°C Temperature of the Tissus: 21 °C +0.5°C We the undersigned attest that to the best of our knowledge the calibration of this device has been accurately conducted and that all information contained within this report has been reviewed for accuracy. Stuart Nicol Director Product Development y s Lex. D. Brooks Member of Enginering Staff (Calibration Engineor) This page has been reviewed (or content and attested o bysignature wthin this document nopmemsmerewe reg oo ave w er mmnopos

NCL Calibration Laboratories Divisonof APREL Laboratoncs Calibration Results Summary The following results relate the Calbrated Dipole and should be used as a quick reference for the user. Mechanical Dimensions Length: 72.0 mm Height: 41.7 mm Electrical Specification swa: 109 U Return Loss: 28. 0B impedance: so90 System Validation Rosults [Frequency 1 Gram 10 Gram Poak [ 1800 mHz 3881 20 Tise Area Scan ¥ Anis (mnd o i8 agoa az2 asie twsox aois X Axt m 2412 180 1205 nsos vom "This page has been reviewed for contant and attested to by signature wihin ts document

NCL Calibration Laboratories Divisin of APREL Tabormtons, Introduction This Calibration Report has been produced in line with the SSI Dipole Calibration Procedure S8H—TP—018—ALSAS. The results contained within this report are for Validation Dipole BCL—049. The calibration routine consisted of a three—step process Step 1 was a mechanical verification of the dipole to ensure that it meets the mechanical specifications. Step 2 was an Electrical Calibration for the Validation Dipole, where the SWR, Impedance, and the Return loss were assessed. Step 3 involved a System Validation using the ALGAG—10U, along with APREL E—020 130 MHz to 26 GHz E—Field Probe Serial Number 212. References SS—TP—018—ALSAS Dipole Calibration Procedure SST—TP—016 Tissue Calibration Procedure IEEE 1528 *Recommended Practice for Determining the Peak Spatial—Average Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) in the Human Body Due to Wireiess Communications Devices: Experimental Techniques® Conditions Dipole BCL—048 received from customerin good condiion, with the attibute of a repair of one radial arm. Ambient Temperature of the Laboratory: 22°C +/—0.5°C Temporature of the Tissue: 20 °C +/0.5°C "This page has been reviewad for content and altested to by signature within this document

NCL Calibration Laboratories Divison of APREL Labortons. Dipole Calibration Results Mechanical Verification APREL APREL Measured Measured Length Hoight Length Hoight 720 mm _ 41.7 mm 7i6mm | 417mm _| Tissue Validation Head Tissue 1800 MHz Measured Dleleclnc con Gonductivity, o [Slm] 140 This page has been reviewed for content and altestad to by signature within is document

Electrical Calibration Test_ Result s11 RC ~26.008 _ swr 1090 edance soon The Following Graphs are the results as displayed on the Vector Network Analyzer S11 Paramoter Return Loss se nevense reruecrIon im a o s REFERENCE PLale Los nowtruoe »ner« —20.000 09 4.000 anrory 0.0000 i nencen 1 1.799500 Oz mget 4 f 1 : —26.091 0 T wrker To m &" mnker To Nt . - »nanken reroour 1.senz5e ie 2.iere00 FuKCTIONS s This page has been reviewed for content and attested to bysignature wiin ths document

NCL Catibration Laboratories Divisn of APREL Laboratones swR see mevense REFLECTION ou a — see REFERENCE PLaW sur »REF+ 1.200. 0 500.000 aU/OIV 0.0000 mn nnuen 1 1.739500 e 12095 U mnkem To hok nemcer To n »nenken Resoour 1.sanasa oie 2.ror000 runcrions "Tis page has been reviewed for content and altested o by sgnature within ths document

NCL Calibration Laboratories Divison of APREL Labortores Smith Chart Dipole Impedance see Reverse ReFLECTION i mnecvance BA »Lane reserence 00000 an neaken 1 1.299500 Oe se.953 2 alaey jo meaken To nek manker To nIN 3 »nanken rervout 1.seaese — 2.rete0e Oe famchints "This page has been reviewed for content and attested to by signature wihin this document

NCL Calibration Laboratories Divison of APRELLabortoris System Validation Results Using the Electrically Calibrated Dipole [Head Tissue 1 Gram Gram FPeak| |_Frequency AbovsFees Pint (~ 1800 viHz | Ss1 2001 _|__7i5e Area Scan Y Asis (mn) 10 as2 az2 asta (w) soex X Axis (mm) a05 aa2 1m9 128 oom oo 4o 4o 6 ¥ Aus u) "This page has been reviewed for content and attested to bysignature wihin ths document

NCL Calibration Laboratories Divisionof APREL Laboratorcs Test Equipment The test equipment used during Probe Calibration, manufacturer, model number and, current calibration status are listed and located on the main APREL server R:NCL\Calibration Equipment\instrument List May 2004 This page has beon reviewed for cantent and altested to bysignature wihin this document

si0 rateg sometzi—zncosa on smineo ‘Teaser wais masice masn peme 14 urdvas perpanar sa ue n aecyons ecepes ul seee oi sure smren Aurmcaoy enade wens mm (soren empemuu oveshionous comssesnsuiesn evecresemmne Gvmeme ncuuroysisisofnis saoceiman (somo eememet w ovsesizrrons aicesoumin Teroiaeaong +0 semsuns Insiams loomariamsava on oveasiseczas: uns rave ic0iosieis en ovaesisnco wsine| (edmonmomemmemy Geroriscon sviand in 11 tonus no tesvorsst on svian sedness Cot ow as (nsovist ov svianisncore cussiesn (nsorise arsvianisnzor recomcoo verrnis mm mues lnna To msvino %a pmesaes) meg wo ra waniee Lewe ons m ow sixrd porn nmusdaty roseneeo ‘war» Rsung por oi # t arsemti xmunnim onGxmcoam pmon m paorpass wog sn voreeame iy «ommo uet on nated Buromy m o vend e fnnoone on.mngins ine sscamooen o oo summmirereu out (n sumonnston omunraniic aa ces o muepors muoms s Apgnmses ag mcwurcop es voreruns s EFFFFEFIZE .—— snroyies voneses jo vonsitonn on 2 wunty mmmminn w suros swosatn sut avo u eovins vonmpary seas ou. sommpaccy se ftoren i sou0 rmoes sons oa tt pnpsecy wones vorsan mins umm pcnmeys omues mepmamerommenes

Ralibration Laboratory of g. SomaizericterKaterirsionst 3chmid & Partner ( Sevce se atiiomane Engineering AG Brrvico esmm citaaies tevarsucevzese i3 8016 Zinch Sutzmrind . smesCataton Sarvice Accrataton io: SCS 108 Acrudte bie SFadent flce of Marsog and Revediation e SuiseAccredtation Sevice s one oth ignstoris tothe EA insttmwa Agreonent i th recogntion f catrtion coritcnies Slossary: TSL tssue simutating liquid ComyE sonsitiity in TSL / NORM xyz NA not applicable or not measured Calibration is Performed According to the Following Standards: the Peak Spatial— a) IEEE Sid 1520—2003, "IEEE Recommended Practice for Determining Averaged Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) in the Human Head from Wireless Communications Devices: Measurement Techniques‘, December 2003 Absorption Rate b) CENELEC EN 50361, "Basic standard for the measurement of Specific MHz — 3 GHz), related to human exposure to electromagnetic fields from mobie phones (300 July 2001 c) Federal Communications Commission Officees offorEngineer ing & Technology (FCC OET), "Evaluating Compliance with FCC Guidelin Human Exposure to Radiofrequency nce of Mobile and Electromagnetic Fields; Additional Information for Evaluating Complia Portable Devices with FCC Limits for Human Exposure to Radiofrequency Emissions‘, Supplement C (Edition 01—01) to Buletin 65 Additional Documentation: d) DASY4 Systom Handbook Methos Applied and Interpretation of Parameters: at the end + Measurement Conditions: Further details are available from the Validation Report of the certficate. Allfigures stated in the certificato aro valid at the frequency indicated + Antenna Parameters with TSL: The dipole is mounted with the spacer to position its food point exactly below the center marking of the flat phantom section, with the arms oriented paralle! to the body axis. + Feed PointImpedance and Return Loss: These parameters are measured with the dipols postioned under the liquid filed phantom. The impedance stated is transformed from the measurement at the SMA connector to the feed point. The Retun Loss ensures low reflected power. No uncertainty required. + Electrical Delay: One—way delay between the SMA connector and the anterna feed point. No uncertainty required + SAR measured: SAR measured at the stated antenna input power. + SAR normalized: SAR as measured, normalized to an input power of 1 W at the antenna connector. + SAR for nominal TSL parameters: The measured TSL parameters are used to calculate the nominal SAR result. Certfcats No: D9t0ve—122_u006 Page2 ot6

Measurement Conditions DASY system contguration,as for as not gven on page ASY version onsve ver Exvapoiation Agranced Extrapolaion Prantom Wodor Fat Phanion ¥$ 0 Distance Bipote Genter— T9L 15 mm with Soncer Area Scanresotuton ox dy= 18 mm Zoom Scan Resolstion dn, dy. oz =5 om Frequency o0 M + 1 Mitz "lead TSL parameters ‘The fotaning parametere and caeuiaions were anoted Temporature Permitivty Conductiity Nominal Head TSL paramaters 2o‘ a1s 097 mhoim Mensured Head TSL paramaters @oz02‘c 41.126% 096 mhainz6% Head TSL temoerature during test @orea‘c — — R result with Head TSL SA averaged over 1 en" (1 g)of Head TSL Conttion SAR measires 260 m nout pover 273 mwig | SHR nomalzes romatznd i 1w 109 mivig SA fer nomina Head TSt parameters* romatzed t 1w t0.9 mwily 2 170 % (c=2) Sh averaged over 19 cn? (10) of Head T9L conction SAR messured 260 mW nout poner 175010 SA¥ nomatzes normabiznd io 1W 70omiio SA fornominal Head TGL parametore® romatiznd io 1W 699 mW io : 165 % (eet) Sormeon o nonina TS parametirsaccoring to ) chacler ‘SAR Genaitutios® C arthcats Ne:Daoov2.122.un06 Pagesor6

Appondix Antonna Parameters with Head TSL [impedance,ranstormed to fees pont so2u—c4j0 [Rewrntoss —moco General Antenna Parameters and Design Electical Delar (one drecton) I 141218 ] After iong tm use with 100W radates power, ony a signt warming otme dipole neat feedpait can be measired ‘The dpole is made of standard semirgid coaial cable. The center conductor ofth feeding in is drecty comnectad t the secand arm of thecipole e anienna is tnerefor atortrcuted for Do—ignaia No excasaiveforse mustbe appliad t th dipae arms. because they might bend or th scidered connactions nearthe fredgoint may be damages Additional EUT Data Manatactres oy seene wanatacured on Juy o«, zoo Cericate No: D00V2—122.ncs Pagect

DASY4 Validation Report for Head TSL Date/Time: 16.06.2006 11:35:14 Test Laboratory: SPEAG, Zurich, Switzerland DUT: Dipole 900 MHz: Type: D9UOV2; Serial: DOGV2 — SN:122 Communication System: CW; Frequency: 900 MH;DutyCycle: I:1 Medium: HSL 900 MHz; Medium parameters used: 900 Mitzz a =0.961 mhoim; s = 41.35 o — 1000 k/‘ Phantom section: Flat Section Measurement Standard: DASY4 (Hligh Precision Assessment) DASY4 Configuration: + Risbe ETIDV6— SN1SD7(P): ConnF(SR, 58 5%; Calitraed: 28 10z008 +. SensorSurfice dn (Medanical Surfce Daectin) + Hecvonics DMA Sn60l; Callbaiet 1512.005 + Praniom: is Phaton 0 lacty Type:QDIOOPSOAA: : +. Measiement SWDASV VA Buld 25;Pstpicesing SW:SEMCAD, V1.a Bail171 Pin = 250 mW; 10 mm/Area Sean (71x81x1): Measwrement grid: dx=15mm, dy=1 Smm Maximum value of SAR (nterpolated) = 2.94 mWig dy—Smm, Pin = 250 mW; d = 10 mm/Zoom Sean (7x7x7)/Cube0: Measurement grd: dx=Smm, d=Smm Reference Value — 57.7 Vim; Power Drift =—0.103 dB Peak SAR (extrapolated) 12 Wike SAR(I g) =2.73 mWig SAR(IO g) = 1.75 mWig Maximum value ofSAR (measured) = 2.97 mW/g «s uose s aze ns a ase riwe 1 Certfcate No: ©300vz—122_un06 Prgesors wnopounnunreuse kess onicveimaue nepurs

impedance Measurement Plot for Head TSL wn zons soresces mose se mz Sn reuses sen w sroe i feasen se wis Certfcate No: D900v2—122unds Pagesors

AnyData Corporation FCC ID: P4MAGT100D APPENDIX D - TEST SYSTEM VERIFICATIONS SCANS Liquid Measurement Result 835 MHz Liquid Target Measured Deviation Limits Simulant Freq [MHz] Parameters Temp [ºC] Value Value [%] [%] ε 22 41.5 41.3 -0.48 ±5 Head 835 σ 22 0.90 0.89 -1.12 ±5 1g SAR 22 9.5 9.42 -0.85 ±10 ε 22 55.2 55.3 +0.18 ±5 Body 835 σ 22 0.97 0.99 +2.0 ±5 1g SAR 22 7.873 7.91 +0.47 ±10 1900 MHz Liquid Target Measured Deviation Limits Simulant Freq [MHz] Parameters Temp [ºC] Value Value [%] [%] ε 22 40.0 39.9 -0.25 ±5 Head 1900 σ 22 1.40 1.38 -1.45 ±5 1g SAR 22 39.7 39.5 -0.51 ±10 ε 22 53.3 53.2 -0.19 ±5 Body 1900 σ 22 1.52 1.51 -0.66 ±5 1g SAR 22 24.97 24.88 -0.36 ±10 εr = relative permittivity, σ = conductivity and ρ=1000kg/m3 Report#R0607263S Page 52 of 68 SAR Evaluation Report

AnyData Corporation FCC ID: P4MAGT100D Test Laboratory: Bay Area Compliance Lab Corp.(BACL) System Validation Check D835 Head DUT: Dipole 900 MHz; Type: D900V2; Serial Number: 122 Communication System: CW; Frequency: 835 MHz;Duty Cycle: 1:1 Medium parameters used: f = 835 MHz; σ = 0.89 mho/m; εr = 41.3; ρ = 1000 kg/m3 Phantom section: Flat Section DASY4 Configuration: • Probe: ET3DV6 - SN1604; ConvF(6.6, 6.6, 6.6); Calibrated: 5/2/2006 • Sensor-Surface: 4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection) • Electronics: DAE3 Sn456; Calibrated: 10/18/2005 • Phantom: SAM with CRP; Type: Twin SAM; Serial: TP-1032 • Measurement SW: DASY4, V4.6 Build 23; Postprocessing SW: SEMCAD, V1.8 Build 161 d=15mm, Pin=1W/Area Scan (61x121x1): Measurement grid: dx=15mm, dy=15mm Maximum value of SAR (interpolated) = 9.82 mW/g d=15mm, Pin=1W/Zoom Scan (7x7x7)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=5mm, dy=5mm, dz=5mm Reference Value = 104.1 V/m; Power Drift = -0.085 dB Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 14.4 W/kg SAR(1 g) = 9.42 mW/g; SAR(10 g) = 5.99 mW/g Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 10.2 mW/g 0 dB = 10.2mW/g Report#R0607263S Page 53 of 68 SAR Evaluation Report

AnyData Corporation FCC ID: P4MAGT100D Test Laboratory: Bay Area Compliance Lab Corp.(BACL) System Validation Check D835 Body DUT: Dipole 900 MHz; Type: D900V2; Serial Number: 122 Communication System: CW; Frequency: 835 MHz;Duty Cycle: 1:1 Medium parameters used: f = 835 MHz; σ = 0.99 mho/m; εr = 55.3; ρ = 1000 kg/m3 Phantom section: Flat Section DASY4 Configuration: • Probe: ET3DV6 - SN1604; ConvF(6.27, 6.27, 6.27); Calibrated: 5/2/2006 • Sensor-Surface: 4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection) • Electronics: DAE3 Sn456; Calibrated: 10/18/2005 • Phantom: SAM with CRP; Type: Twin SAM; Serial: TP-1032 • Measurement SW: DASY4, V4.6 Build 23; Postprocessing SW: SEMCAD, V1.8 Build 161 d=15mm, Pin=1W/Area Scan (61x121x1): Measurement grid: dx=15mm, dy=15mm Maximum value of SAR (interpolated) = 8.01 W/g d=15mm, Pin=1W/Zoom Scan (7x7x7)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=5mm, dy=5mm, dz=5mm Reference Value = 97.8 V/m; Power Drift = -0.065 dB Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 12.9 W/kg SAR(1 g) = 7.91 mW/g; SAR(10 g) = 5.89 mW/g Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 8.04 mW/g 0 dB = 8.04mW/g Report#R0607263S Page 54 of 68 SAR Evaluation Report

AnyData Corporation FCC ID: P4MAGT100D Test Laboratory: Bay Area Compliance Lab Corp.(BACL) System Validation Check_D1900_Head DUT: Dipole 1900 MHz; Type: D-1800-S-1; Serial Number: BCL-049 Communication System: CW; Frequency: 1900 MHz;Duty Cycle: 1:1 Medium parameters used: f = 1900 MHz; σ = 1.38 mho/m; εr = 39.9; ρ = 1000 kg/m3 Phantom section: Flat Section DASY4 Configuration: • Probe: ET3DV6 - SN1604; ConvF(5.29, 5.29, 5.29); Calibrated: 5/2/2006 • Sensor-Surface: 4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection) • Electronics: DAE3 Sn456; Calibrated: 10/18/2005 • Phantom: SAM with CRP; Type: Twin SAM; Serial: TP-1032 • Measurement SW: DASY4, V4.6 Build 23; Postprocessing SW: SEMCAD, V1.8 Build 161 d=10mm, Pin=1W/Area Scan (51x91x1): Measurement grid: dx=15mm, dy=15mm Maximum value of SAR (interpolated) = 40.5 mW/g d=10mm, Pin=1W/Zoom Scan (7x7x7)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=5mm, dy=5mm, dz=5mm Reference Value = 111.3 V/m; Power Drift = -0.154 dB Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 45.4 W/kg SAR(1 g) = 39.5 mW/g; SAR(10 g) = 19.9 mW/g Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 40.1 mW/g 0 dB = 40.1mW/g Report#R0607263S Page 55 of 68 SAR Evaluation Report

AnyData Corporation FCC ID: P4MAGT100D Test Laboratory: Bay Area Compliance Lab Corp.(BACL) System Validation Check_D1900_Body DUT: Dipole 1900 MHz; Type: D-1800-S-1; Serial Number: BCL-049 Communication System: CW; Frequency: 1900 MHz;Duty Cycle: 1:1 Medium parameters used: f = 1900 MHz; σ = 1.51 mho/m; εr = 53.2; ρ = 1000 kg/m3 Phantom section: Flat Section DASY4 Configuration: • Probe: ET3DV6 - SN1604; ConvF(4.88, 4.88, 4.88); Calibrated: 5/2/2006 • Sensor-Surface: 4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection) • Electronics: DAE3 Sn456; Calibrated: 10/18/2005 • Phantom: SAM with CRP; Type: Twin SAM; Serial: TP-1032 • Measurement SW: DASY4, V4.6 Build 23; Postprocessing SW: SEMCAD, V1.8 Build 161 d=10mm, Pin=1W/Area Scan (51x91x1): Measurement grid: dx=15mm, dy=15mm Maximum value of SAR (interpolated) = 24.91 mW/g d=10mm, Pin=1W/Zoom Scan (7x7x7)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=5mm, dy=5mm, dz=5mm Reference Value = 110.2 V/m; Power Drift = 0.002 dB Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 56.9 W/kg SAR(1 g) = 24.88 mW/g; SAR(10 g) = 11.24 mW/g Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 25.7 mW/g 0 dB = 25.7mW/g Report#R0607263S Page 56 of 68 SAR Evaluation Report

AnyData Corporation FCC ID: P4MAGT100D APPENDIX E - EUT SCANS Test Laboratory: Bay Area Compliance Lab Corp.(BACL) Body worn Low CH with belt clip DUT: AnyData AGT-100D; Type: Wireless Data Module; Serial Number: 2019418 Communication System: CDMA; Frequency: 824.7 MHz;Duty Cycle: 1:1 Medium parameters used: f = 824.7 MHz; σ = 0.99 mho/m; εr = 55.3; ρ = 1000 kg/m3 Phantom section: Flat Section DASY4 Configuration: • Probe: ET3DV6 - SN1604; ConvF(6.27, 6.27, 6.27); Calibrated: 5/2/2006 • Sensor-Surface: 4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection) • Electronics: DAE3 Sn456; Calibrated: 10/18/2005 • Phantom: SAM with CRP; Type: Twin SAM; Serial: TP-1032 • Measurement SW: DASY4, V4.6 Build 23; Postprocessing SW: SEMCAD, V1.8 Build 161 Back Touch the Phantom with Belt Clip Low CH/Area Scan (61x81x1): Measurement grid: dx=15mm, dy=15mm Maximum value of SAR (interpolated) = 0.400 mW/g Back Touch the Phantom with Belt Clip Low CH/Zoom Scan (5x5x5)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=5mm, dy=5mm, dz=5mm Reference Value = 20.5 V/m; Power Drift = 0.03dB Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 0.590 W/kg SAR(1 g) = 0.380 mW/g; SAR(10 g) = 0.247 mW/g Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 0.429 mW/g 0 dB = 0.429mW/g Plot#1 Report#R0607263S Page 57 of 68 SAR Evaluation Report

AnyData Corporation FCC ID: P4MAGT100D Test Laboratory: Bay Area Compliance Lab Corp.(BACL) Body worn Mid CH with belt clip DUT: AnyData AGT-100D; Type: Wireless Data Module; Serial Number: 2019418 Communication System: CDMA; Frequency: 836.52 MHz;Duty Cycle: 1:1 Medium parameters used: f = 836.52 MHz; σ = 0.99 mho/m; εr = 55.2; ρ = 1000 kg/m3 Phantom section: Flat Section DASY4 Configuration: • Probe: ET3DV6 - SN1604; ConvF(6.27, 6.27, 6.27); Calibrated: 5/2/2006 • Sensor-Surface: 4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection) • Electronics: DAE3 Sn456; Calibrated: 10/18/2005 • Phantom: SAM with CRP; Type: Twin SAM; Serial: TP-1032 • Measurement SW: DASY4, V4.6 Build 23; Postprocessing SW: SEMCAD, V1.8 Build 161 Back Touch the Phantom with Belt Clip Mid CH/Area Scan (61x81x1): Measurement grid: dx=15mm, dy=15mm Maximum value of SAR (interpolated) = 0.907 mW/g Back Touch the Phantom with Belt Clip Mid CH/Zoom Scan (5x5x5)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=5mm, dy=5mm, dz=5mm Reference Value = 29.6 V/m; Power Drift = 0.02dB Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 1.21 W/kg SAR(1 g) = 0.821 mW/g; SAR(10 g) = 0.538 mW/g Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 0.878 mW/g 0 dB = 0.878mW/g Plot#2 Report#R0607263S Page 58 of 68 SAR Evaluation Report

AnyData Corporation FCC ID: P4MAGT100D Test Laboratory: Bay Area Compliance Lab Corp.(BACL) Body worn High CH with belt clip DUT: AnyData AGT-100D; Type: Wireless Data Module; Serial Number: 2019418 Communication System: CDMA; Frequency: 848.31 MHz;Duty Cycle: 1:1 Medium parameters used: f = 848.31 MHz; σ = 0.99 mho/m; εr = 55.2; ρ = 1000 kg/m3 Phantom section: Flat Section DASY4 Configuration: • Probe: ET3DV6 - SN1604; ConvF(6.27, 6.27, 6.27); Calibrated: 5/2/2006 • Sensor-Surface: 4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection) • Electronics: DAE3 Sn456; Calibrated: 10/18/2005 • Phantom: SAM with CRP; Type: Twin SAM; Serial: TP-1032 • Measurement SW: DASY4, V4.6 Build 23; Postprocessing SW: SEMCAD, V1.8 Build 161 Back Touch the Phantom with Belt Clip High CH 3/Area Scan (61x91x1): Measurement grid: dx=15mm, dy=15mm Maximum value of SAR (interpolated) = 0.331 mW/g Back Touch the Phantom with Belt Clip High CH 3/Zoom Scan (5x5x5)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=5mm, dy=5mm, dz=5mm Reference Value = 17.5 V/m; Power Drift = -0.03dB Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 0.447 W/kg SAR(1 g) = 0.302 mW/g; SAR(10 g) = 0.196 mW/g Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 0.327 mW/g 0 dB = 0.327mW/g Plot#3 Report#R0607263S Page 59 of 68 SAR Evaluation Report

AnyData Corporation FCC ID: P4MAGT100D Z-Axis Test Laboratory: Bay Area Compliance Lab Corp.(BACL) Report#R0607263S Page 60 of 68 SAR Evaluation Report

AnyData Corporation FCC ID: P4MAGT100D Body worn Low CH with belt clip DUT: AnyData AGT-100D; Type: Wireless Data Module; Serial Number: 2019418 Communication System: CDMA; Frequency: 1851.25 MHz;Duty Cycle: 1:1 Medium parameters used: f = 1900 MHz; σ = 1.53 mho/m; εr = 53.4; ρ = 1000 kg/m3 Phantom section: Flat Section DASY4 Configuration: • Probe: ET3DV6 - SN1604; ConvF(4.88, 4.88, 4.88); Calibrated: 5/2/2006 • Sensor-Surface: 4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection) • Electronics: DAE3 Sn456; Calibrated: 10/18/2005 • Phantom: SAM with CRP; Type: Twin SAM; Serial: TP-1032 • Measurement SW: DASY4, V4.6 Build 23; Postprocessing SW: SEMCAD, V1.8 Build 161 Back Touch the Phantom with Belt Clip Low CH /Area Scan (61x81x1): Measurement grid: dx=15mm, dy=15mm Maximum value of SAR (interpolated) = 1.12 mW/g Back Touch the Phantom with Belt Clip Low CH /Zoom Scan (7x7x7)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=5mm, dy=5mm, dz=5mm Reference Value = 17.9 V/m; Power Drift = 0.04dB Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 1.88 W/kg SAR(1 g) = 0.943 mW/g; SAR(10 g) = 0.562 mW/g Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 1.03 mW/g 0 dB = 1.03mW/g Plot#4 Report#R0607263S Page 61 of 68 SAR Evaluation Report

AnyData Corporation FCC ID: P4MAGT100D Test Laboratory: Bay Area Compliance Lab Corp.(BACL) Body worn Mid CH with belt clip DUT: AnyData AGT-100D; Type: Wireless Data Module; Serial Number: 2019418 Communication System: CDMA; Frequency: 1880 MHz;Duty Cycle: 1:1 Medium parameters used: f = 1900 MHz; σ = 1.51 mho/m; εr = 53.2; ρ = 1000 kg/m3 Phantom section: Flat Section DASY4 Configuration: • Probe: ET3DV6 - SN1604; ConvF(4.88, 4.88, 4.88); Calibrated: 5/2/2006 • Sensor-Surface: 4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection) • Electronics: DAE3 Sn456; Calibrated: 10/18/2005 • Phantom: SAM with CRP; Type: Twin SAM; Serial: TP-1032 • Measurement SW: DASY4, V4.6 Build 23; Postprocessing SW: SEMCAD, V1.8 Build 161 Back Touch the Phantom with Belt Clip Mid CH/Area Scan (61x81x1): Measurement grid: dx=15mm, dy=15mm Maximum value of SAR (interpolated) = 1.62 mW/g Back Touch the Phantom with Belt Clip Mid CH/Zoom Scan (5x5x5)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=5mm, dy=5mm, dz=5mm Reference Value = 28.2 V/m; Power Drift = 0.03dB Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 2.37 W/kg SAR(1 g) = 1.46 mW/g; SAR(10 g) = 0.863 mW/g Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 1.59 mW/g Plot#5 Test Laboratory: Bay Area Compliance Lab 0 dB = 1.59mW/g Corp.(BACL) Body worn High CH with belt clip DUT: AnyData AGT-100D; Type: Wireless Data Module; Serial Number: 2019418 Communication System: CDMA; Frequency: 1908.75 MHz;Duty Cycle: 1:1 Medium parameters used: f = 1900 MHz; σ = 1.51 mho/m; εr = 53.2; ρ = 1000 kg/m3 Phantom section: Flat Section Report#R0607263S Page 62 of 68 SAR Evaluation Report

AnyData Corporation FCC ID: P4MAGT100D DASY4 Configuration: • Probe: ET3DV6 - SN1604; ConvF(4.88, 4.88, 4.88); Calibrated: 5/2/2006 • Sensor-Surface: 4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection) • Electronics: DAE3 Sn456; Calibrated: 10/18/2005 • Phantom: SAM with CRP; Type: Twin SAM; Serial: TP-1032 • Measurement SW: DASY4, V4.6 Build 23; Postprocessing SW: SEMCAD, V1.8 Build 161 Back Touch the Phantom with Belt Clip High CH/Area Scan (61x81x1): Measurement grid: dx=15mm, dy=15mm Maximum value of SAR (interpolated) = 1.60 mW/g Back Touch the Phantom with Belt Clip High CH/Zoom Scan (7x7x7)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=5mm, dy=5mm, dz=5mm Reference Value = 21.6 V/m; Power Drift = 0.04dB Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 2.14 W/kg SAR(1 g) = 1.31 mW/g; SAR(10 g) = 0.765 mW/g Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 1.45 mW/g 0 dB = 1.45mW/ Plot#6 Report#R0607263S Page 63 of 68 SAR Evaluation Report

AnyData Corporation FCC ID: P4MAGT100D Z-Axis Report#R0607263S Page 64 of 68 SAR Evaluation Report

AnyData Corporation FCC ID: P4MAGT100D APPENDIX F – CONDUCTED OUTPUT POWER MEASUREMENT Provision Applicable The measured peak output power should be greater and within 5% than EMI measurement. Test Procedure The RF output of the transmitter was connected to the input of the spectrum analyzer through sufficient attenuation. Test equipment Agilent PSA E4446A Spectrum Analyzer, Calibration Due Date: 2007-03-06. Test Results Frequency (MHz) Output Power in dBm Output Power in Watt 824.7 26.15 0.412 836.52 26.03 0.400 848.3 25.97 0.395 1851.25 26.24 0.420 1880 26.14 0.411 1908.75 26.27 0.424 Report#R0607263S Page 65 of 68 SAR Evaluation Report

AnyData Corporation FCC ID: P4MAGT100D APPENDIX G – EUT TEST POSITION PHOTOS Body worm setup photo with belt clip Report#R0607263S Page 66 of 68 SAR Evaluation Report

AnyData Corporation FCC ID: P4MAGT100D APPENDIX H – EUT & ACCESSORIES PHOTOS EUT - Top View EUT - Bottom View Report#R0607263S Page 67 of 68 SAR Evaluation Report

AnyData Corporation FCC ID: P4MAGT100D APPENDIX I - INFORMATIVE REFERENCES [1] Federal Communications Commission, \Report and order: Guidelines for evaluating the environmental effects of radiofrequency radiation", Tech. Rep. FCC 96-326, FCC, Washington, D.C. 20554, 1996. [2] David L. Means Kwok Chan, Robert F. Cleveland, \Evaluating compliance with FCC guidelines for human exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields", Tech. Rep., Federal Communication Commission, O_ce of Engineering & Technology, Washington, DC, 1997. [3] Thomas Schmid, Oliver Egger, and Niels Kuster, \Automated E-_eld scanning system for dosimetric assessments", IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 44, pp. 105{113, Jan. 1996. [4] Niels Kuster, Ralph K.astle, and Thomas Schmid, \Dosimetric evaluation of mobile communications equipment with known precision", IEICE Transactions on Communications, vol. E80-B, no. 5, pp. 645{652, May 1997. [5] CENELEC, \Considerations for evaluating of human exposure to electromagnetic fields (EMFs) from mobile telecommunication equipment (MTE) in the frequency range 30MHz - 6GHz", Tech. Rep., CENELEC, European Committee for Electrotechnical Standardization, Brussels, 1997. [6] ANSI, ANSI/IEEE C95.1-1992: IEEE Standard for Safety Levels with Respect to Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields, 3 kHz to 300 GHz, The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc., New York, NY 10017, 1992. [7] Katja Pokovic, Thomas Schmid, and Niels Kuster, \Robust setup for precise calibration of E-field probes in tissue simulating liquids at mobile communications frequencies", in ICECOM _ 97, Dubrovnik, October 15{17, 1997, pp. 120-24. [8] Katja Pokovic, Thomas Schmid, and Niels Kuster, \E-field probe with improved isotropy in brain simulating liquids", in Proceedings of the ELMAR, Zadar, Croatia, 23{25 June, 1996, pp. 172-175. [9] Volker Hombach, Klaus Meier, Michael Burkhardt, Eberhard K. uhn, and Niels Kuster, \The depen-dence of EM energy absorption upon human head modeling at 900 MHz", IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 44, no. 10, pp. 1865-1873, Oct. 1996. [10] Klaus Meier, Ralf Kastle, Volker Hombach, Roger Tay, and Niels Kuster, \The dependence of EM energy absorption upon human head modeling at 1800 MHz", IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, Oct. 1997, in press. [11] W. Gander, Computermathematik, Birkhaeuser, Basel, 1992. [12] W. H. Press, S. A. Teukolsky,W. T. Vetterling, and B. P. Flannery, Numerical Recepies in C, The Art of Scientific Computing, Second Edition, Cambridge University Press, 1992.Dosimetric Evaluation of Sample device, month 1998 9 [13] NIS81 NAMAS, \The treatment of uncertainity in EMC measurement", Tech. Rep., NAMAS Executive, National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, Middlesex, England, 1994. [14] Barry N. Taylor and Christ E. Kuyatt, \Guidelines for evaluating and expressing the uncertainty of NIST measurement results", Tech. Rep., National Institute of Standards and Technology, 1994. Dosimetric Evaluation of Sample device, month 1998 10. Report#R0607263S Page 68 of 68 SAR Evaluation Report


Document Created: 2006-08-28 18:05:31
Document Modified: 2006-08-28 18:05:31
© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC