04T2458 SAR Report

FCC ID: NM8VIVIDA

RF Exposure Info

Download: PDF
FCCID_463586

in accordance with the requirements of FCC Report and Order: ET Docket 93-62, and OET Bulletin 65 Supplement C for Dual Band (Cellular & PCS Band) Phone MODEL: ST10B FCC ID: NM8VIVIDA January 29, 2004 REPORT NO: 04T2458-2 Prepared for High Tech Computer Corp 23, Hsin-Hua Rd Taoyuan, 330, Taiwan Prepared by COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION SERVICES 561F MONTEREY ROAD, MORGAN HILL, CA 95037, USA TEL: (408) 463-0885

REPORT NO: 04T2458-2 DATE: January 29, 2004 FCC ID: NM8VIVIDA CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE (SAR EVALUATION) DATES OF TEST: January 29, 2004 APPLICANT: High Tech Computer Corp 23, Hsin-Hua Rd Taoyuan, 330, Taiwan MODEL: ST10B FCC ID: NM8VIVIDA DEVICE CATEGORY: PORTABLE DEVICES EXPOSURE CATEGORY: GENERAL POPULATION/UNCONTROLLED EXPOSURE Test Sample is a: Production unit Multiple Access Scheme: CDMA Tx Frequency: Cellular band: 824 MHz to 849 MHz PCS band: 1850 MHz to 1910 MHz Max. O/P Power: Cellular band: 23.90 dBm (Conducted/Average) PCS band: 24.75 dBm Max. SAR (1g): Cellular band: 0.550 mW/g (Right head touched position) 0.542 mW/g (Body worn) PCS band: 1.35 mW/g (Right head tilted position) 0.662 mW/g (Body worn) FCC Rule Part(s): Cellular band: 22H PCS band: 24E This wireless portable device has been shown to be capable of compliance for localized specific absorption rate (SAR) for uncontrolled environment/general population exposure limits specified in ANSI/IEEE Std. C95.1-1992 and had been tested in accordance with the measurement procedures specified in FCC OET 65 Supplement C (released on 6/29/2001 see Test Report). I attest to the accuracy of data. All measurements reported herein were performed by me or were made under my supervision and are correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I assume full responsibility for the completeness of these measurements and vouch for the qualifications of all persons taking them. Steve Cheng EMC Engineering Manager COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION SERVICES Page: 2 of 32 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of CCS. This document may be altered or revised by Compliance Certification Services personnel only, and shall be noted in the revision section of the document.

REPORT NO: 04T2458-2 DATE: January 29, 2004 FCC ID: NM8VIVIDA TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. EQUIPMENT UNDER TEST (EUT) DESCRIPTION ............................................................. 4 2. REQUIREMENTS FOR COMPLIANCE TESTING DEFINED BY THE FCC............................... 4 3. DOSIMETRIC ASSESSMENT SETUP ............................................................................... 4 3.1. MEASUREMENT SYSTEM DIAGRAM ..................................................................................................................5 3.2. SYSTEM COMPONENTS ...................................................................................................................................6 4. EVALUATION PROCEDURES ......................................................................................... 8 5. MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY................................................................................... 12 6. EXPOSURE LIMIT ...................................................................................................... 13 7. EUT ARRANGEMENT ................................................................................................ 14 8. MEASUREMENT RESULTS .......................................................................................... 17 8.1. SIMULATING LIQUIDS PARAMETER CHECK .....................................................................................................17 8.2. SYSTEM PERFORMANCE CHECK ...................................................................................................................19 8.3. EUT TUNE-UP PROCEDURES ........................................................................................................................21 8.4. SAR MEASUREMENT RESULTS .....................................................................................................................22 9. EUT PHOTOS ........................................................................................................... 27 10. EQUIPMENT LIST & CALIBRATION STATUS.................................................................. 30 11. REFERENCES ........................................................................................................... 31 12. ATTACHMENTS ......................................................................................................... 32 COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION SERVICES Page: 3 of 32 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of CCS. This document may be altered or revised by Compliance Certification Services personnel only, and shall be noted in the revision section of the document.

REPORT NO: 04T2458-2 DATE: January 29, 2004 FCC ID: NM8VIVIDA 1. EQUIPMENT UNDER TEST (EUT) DESCRIPTION The following is the information provided by the applicant. Type of EUT: Dual Band (Cellular & PCS Band) Phone Type/Model No.: ST10B Modulation Type: CDMA TX Frequency: Cellular band: 824 MHz to 849 MHz PCS band: 1850 MHz to 1910 MHz Duty Cycle: 100% Battery: Only one model with EUT 2. REQUIREMENTS FOR COMPLIANCE TESTING DEFINED BY THE FCC The US Federal Communications Commission has released the report and order “Guidelines for Evaluating the Environmental Effects of RF Radiation", ET Docket No. 93-62 in August 1996. The order requires routine SAR evaluation prior to equipment authorization of portable transmitter devices, including portable telephones. For consumer products, the applicable limit is 1.6 mW/g for an uncontrolled environment and 8.0 mW/g for an occupational/controlled environment as recommended by the ANSI/IEEE standard C95.1-1992. According to the Supplement C of OET Bulletin 65 “Evaluating Compliance with FCC Guide-lines for Human Exposure to Radio frequency Electromagnetic Fields", released on Jun 29, 2001 by the FCC, the device should be evaluated at maximum output power (radiated from the antenna) under “worst-case” conditions for normal or intended use, incorporating normal antenna operating positions, device peak performance frequencies and positions for maximum RF energy coupling. 3. DOSIMETRIC ASSESSMENT SETUP These measurements were performed with the automated near-field scanning system DASY3 from Schmid & Partner Engineering AG (SPEAG). The system is based on a high precision robot (working range greater than 0.9 m), which positions the probes with a positional repeatability of better than ± 0.02 mm. Special E- and H-field probes have been developed for measurements close to material discontinuity, the sensors of which are directly loaded with a Schottky diode and connected via highly resistive lines to the data acquisition unit. The SAR measurements were conducted with the dosimetric probe ET3DV6, SN: 1577 (manufactured by SPEAG), designed in the classical triangular configuration and optimized for dosimetric evaluation. The probe has been calibrated according to the procedure described in [7] with accuracy of better than ±10%. The spherical isotropy was evaluated with the procedure described in [8] and found to be better than ±0.25 dB. The phantom used was the SAM Twin Phantom as described in FCC supplement C, IEE P1528 and CENELEC EN50361. COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION SERVICES Page: 4 of 32 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of CCS. This document may be altered or revised by Compliance Certification Services personnel only, and shall be noted in the revision section of the document.

REPORT NO: 04T2458-2 DATE: January 29, 2004 FCC ID: NM8VIVIDA 3.1. MEASUREMENT SYSTEM DIAGRAM The DASY4 system for performing compliance tests consists of the following items: • A standard high precision 6-axis robot (St¨aubli RX family) with controller, teach pendant and software. An arm extension for accommodating the data acquisition electronics (DAE). • A dosimetric probe, i.e., an isotropic E-field probe optimized and calibrated for usage in tissue simulating liquid. The probe is equipped with an optical surface detector system. • A data acquisition electronics (DAE) which performs the signal amplification, signal multiplexing, AD-conversion, offset measurements, mechanical surface detection, collision detection, etc. The unit is battery powered with standard or rechargeable batteries. The signal is optically transmitted to the EOC. • The Electro-optical converter (EOC) performs the conversion between optical and electrical of the signals for the digital communication to the DAE and for the analog signal from the optical surface detection. The EOC is connected to the measurement server. • The function of the measurement server is to perform the time critical tasks such as signal filtering, control of the robot operation and fast movement interrupts. • A probe alignment unit which improves the (absolute) accuracy of the probe positioning. • A computer operating Windows 2000 or Windows XP. • DASY4 software. • Remote control with teach pendant and additional circuitry for robot safety such as warning lamps, etc. • The SAM twin phantom enabling testing left-hand and right-hand usage. • The device holder for handheld mobile phones. • Tissue simulating liquid mixed according to the given recipes. • Validation dipole kits allowing validating the proper functioning of the system. COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION SERVICES Page: 5 of 32 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of CCS. This document may be altered or revised by Compliance Certification Services personnel only, and shall be noted in the revision section of the document.

REPORT NO: 04T2458-2 DATE: January 29, 2004 FCC ID: NM8VIVIDA 3.2. SYSTEM COMPONENTS DASY4 MEASUREMENT SERVER The DASY4 measurement server is based on a PC/104 CPU board with a 166MHz low-power Pentium, 32MB chip disk and 64MB RAM. The necessary circuits for communication with either the DAE3 electronic box as well as the 16-bit AD-converter system for optical detection and digital I/O interface are contained on the DASY4 I/O-board, which is directly connected to the PC/104 bus of the CPU board. The measurement server performs all real-time data evaluation for field measurements and surface detection, controls robot movements and handles safety operation. The PC-operating system cannot interfere with these time critical processes. All connections are supervised by a watchdog, and disconnection of any of the cables to the measurement server will automatically disarm the robot and disable all program-controlled robot movements. Furthermore, the measurement server is equipped with two expansion slots which are reserved for future applications. Please note that the expansion slots do not have a standardized pinout and therefore only the expansion cards provided by SPEAG can be inserted. Expansion cards from any other supplier could seriously damage the measurement server. Calibration: No calibration required. DATA ACQUISITION ELECTRONICS (DAE) The data acquisition electronics (DAE3) consists of a highly sensitive electrometer grade preamplifier with auto-zeroing, a channel and gain-switching multiplexer, a fast 16 bit AD converter and a command decoder and control logic unit. Transmission to the measurement server is accomplished through an optical downlink for data and status information as well as an optical uplink for commands and the clock. The mechanical probe mounting device includes two different sensor systems for frontal and sideways probe contacts. They are used for mechanical surface detection and probe collision detection. The input impedance of the DAE3 box is 200MOhm; the inputs are symmetrical and floating. Common mode rejection is above 80 dB. ES3DV2 ISOTROPIC E-FIELD PROBE FOR DOSIMETRIC MEASUREMENTS Construction: Symmetrical design with triangular core Interleaved sensors Built-in shielding against static charges PEEK enclosure material (resistant to organic solvents, e.g., glycolether) Calibration: Basic Broad Band Calibration in air: 10-2500 MHz. Conversion Factors (CF) for HSL 900 and HSL 1800 CF-Calibration for other liquids and frequencies upon request. Frequency: 10 MHz to > 6 GHz; Linearity: ± 0.2 dB Directivity: ± 0.2 dB in HSL (rotation around probe axis); ± 0.3 dB in tissue material (rotation normal to probe axis) Dynamic Range: 5 µW/g to > 100 mW/g; Linearity: ± 0.2 dB Dimensions: Overall length: 330 mm (Tip: 20 mm) Tip diameter: 3.9 mm (Body: 12 mm) Distance from probe tip to dipole centers: 2.7 mm Application: General dosimetry up to 6 GHz Dosimetry in strong gradient fields Compliance tests of mobile phones Interior of probe Isotropic E-Field Probe COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION SERVICES Page: 6 of 32 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of CCS. This document may be altered or revised by Compliance Certification Services personnel only, and shall be noted in the revision section of the document.

REPORT NO: 04T2458-2 DATE: January 29, 2004 FCC ID: NM8VIVIDA SAM PHANTOM (V4.0) Construction: The shell corresponds to the specifications of the Specific Anthropomorphic Mannequin (SAM) phantom defined in IEEE 1528-200X, CENELEC 50361 and IEC 62209. It enables the dosimetric evaluation of left and right hand phone usage as well as body mounted usage at the flat phantom region. A cover prevents evaporation of the liquid. Reference markings on the phantom allow the complete setup of all predefined phantom positions and measurement grids by manually teaching three points with the robot. Shell Thickness: 2 ±0.2 mm Filling Volume: Approx. 25 liters Dimensions: Height: 810mm; Length: 1000mm; Width: 500mm DEVICE HOLDER FOR SAM TWIN PHANTOM Construction: In combination with the Twin SAM Phantom V4.0 or Twin SAM, the Mounting Device (made from POM) enables the rotation of the mounted transmitter in spherical coordinates, whereby the rotation point is the ear opening. The devices can be easily and accurately positioned according to IEC, IEEE, CENELEC, FCC or other specifications. The device holder can be locked at different phantom locations (left head, right head, flat phantom). SYSTEM VALIDATION KITS Construction: Symmetrical dipole with l/4 balun Enables measurement of feedpoint impedance with NWA Matched for use near flat phantoms filled with brain simulating solutions Includes distance holder and tripod adaptor. Frequency: 450, 900, 1800, 2450, 5800 MHz Return loss: > 20 dB at specified validation position Power capability: > 100 W (f < 1GHz); > 40 W (f > 1GHz) Dimensions: 450V2: dipole length: 270 mm; overall height: 330 mm D900V2: dipole length: 149 mm; overall height: 330 mm D1800V2: dipole length: 72 mm; overall height: 300 mm D2450V2: dipole length: 51.5 mm; overall height: 300 mm D5GHzV2: dipole length: 25.5 mm; overall height: 290 mm COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION SERVICES Page: 7 of 32 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of CCS. This document may be altered or revised by Compliance Certification Services personnel only, and shall be noted in the revision section of the document.

REPORT NO: 04T2458-2 DATE: January 29, 2004 FCC ID: NM8VIVIDA 4. EVALUATION PROCEDURES DATA EVALUATION The DASY4 post processing software (SEMCAD) automatically executes the following procedures to calculate the field units from the microvolt readings at the probe connector. The parameters used in the evaluation are stored in the configuration modules of the software: Probe parameters: - Sensitivity Normi, ai0, ai1, ai2 - Conversion factor ConvFi - Diode compression point dcpi Device parameters: - Frequency f - Crest factor cf Media parameters: - Conductivity σ - Density ρ These parameters must be set correctly in the software. They can be found in the component documents or be imported into the software from the configuration files issued for the DASY components. In the direct measuring mode of the multi-meter option, the parameters of the actual system setup are used. In the scan visualization and export modes, the parameters stored in the corresponding document files are used. The first step of the evaluation is a linearization of the filtered input signal to account for the compression characteristics of the detector diode. The compensation depends on the input signal, the diode type and the DC-transmission factor from the diode to the evaluation electronics. If the exciting field is pulsed, the crest factor of the signal must be known to correctly compensate for peak power. The formula for each channel can be given as: cf V =U +U ⋅ 2 i i i dcp i with Vi = Compensated signal of channel i (i = x, y, z) Ui = Input signal of channel i (i = x, y, z) cf = Crest factor of exciting field (DASY parameter) dcpi = Diode compression point (DASY parameter) From the compensated input signals the primary field data for each channel can be evaluated: E-field probes: V E = i i Norm • ConvF i a +a f +a f 2 H-field probes: i10 i11 i12 H i = Vi ⋅ f with Vi = Compensated signal of channel i (i = x, y, z) Normi = Sensor sensitivity of channel i (i = x, y, z) µV/(V/m)2 for E0field Probes ConvF = Sensitivity enhancement in solution aij = Sensor sensitivity factors for H-field probes f = Carrier frequency (GHz) Ei = Electric field strength of channel i in V/m Hi = Magnetic field strength of channel i in A/m COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION SERVICES Page: 8 of 32 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of CCS. This document may be altered or revised by Compliance Certification Services personnel only, and shall be noted in the revision section of the document.

REPORT NO: 04T2458-2 DATE: January 29, 2004 FCC ID: NM8VIVIDA The RSS value of the field components gives the total field strength (Hermitian magnitude): = E +E +E 2 2 2 E tot x y z The primary field data are used to calculate the derived field units. σ SAR = E ⋅ 2 tot ρ ⋅1000 with SAR = local specific absorption rate in mW/g Etot = total field strength in V/m σ = conductivity in [mho/m] or [Siemens/m] ρ = equivalent tissue density in g/cm3 Note that the density is normally set to 1 (or 1.06), to account for actual brain density rather than the density of the simulation liquid. The power flow density is calculated assuming the excitation field as a free space field. 2 E or P = H tot ⋅ 37.7 2 P pwe = tot pwe 3770 with Ppwe = Equivalent power density of a plane wave in mW/cm2 Etot = total electric field strength in V/m Htot = total magnetic field strength in A/m COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION SERVICES Page: 9 of 32 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of CCS. This document may be altered or revised by Compliance Certification Services personnel only, and shall be noted in the revision section of the document.

REPORT NO: 04T2458-2 DATE: January 29, 2004 FCC ID: NM8VIVIDA SAR SYSTEM MEASUREMENT PROCEDURES The procedure for assessing the peak spatial-average SAR value consists of the following steps: • Power Reference Measurement The reference and drift jobs are useful jobs for monitoring the power drift of the device under test in the batch process. Both jobs measure the field at a specified reference position, at a selectable distance from the phantom surface. The reference position can be either the selected section’s grid reference point or a user point in this section. The reference job projects the selected point onto the phantom surface, orients the probe perpendicularly to the surface, and approaches the surface using the selected detection method. • Area Scan The area scan is used as a fast scan in two dimensions to find the area of high field values, before doing a finer measurement around the hot spot. The sophisticated interpolation routines implemented in DASY4 software can find the maximum locations even in relatively coarse grids. This grid is anchored at the grid reference point of the selected section in the phantom. When the area scan’s property sheet is brought-up, grid settings can be edited by a user. When an area scan has measured all reachable points, it computes the field maximum found in the scanned area, within a range of the global maximum. If only one Zoom Scan follows the Area Scan, then only the absolute maximum will be taken as reference. For cases where multiple maximums are detected, the number of Zoom Scans has to be increased accordingly. • Zoom Scan Zoom scans are used to assess the peak spatial SAR values within a cubic averaging volume containing 1 g and 10 g of simulated tissue. The default zoom scan measures 5 x 5 x 7 points within a cube whose base faces are centered around the maximum found in a preceding area scan job within the same procedure. If the preceding Area Scan job indicates more then one maximum, the number of Zoom Scans has to be enlarged accordingly. For dosimetric application, it is necessary to assess the peak spatial SAR value averaged over a volume. For this purpose, fine resolution volume scans need to be performed at the peak SAR location(s) determined during the Area Scan. • Power Drift measurement The drift job measures the field at the same location as the most recent reference job within the same procedure, and with the same settings. The drift measurement gives the field difference in dB from the reading conducted within the last reference measurement. Several drift measurements are possible for one reference measurement. This allows a user to monitor the power drift of the device under test within a batch process. In the properties of the Drift job, the user can specify a limit for the drift and have DASY4 software stop the measurements if this limit is exceeded. • Z-Scan The Z Scan job measures points along a vertical straight line. The line runs along the Z-axis of a one- dimensional grid. A user can anchor the grid to the current probe location. As with any other grids, the local Z-axis of the anchor location establishes the Z-axis of the grid. COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION SERVICES Page: 10 of 32 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of CCS. This document may be altered or revised by Compliance Certification Services personnel only, and shall be noted in the revision section of the document.

REPORT NO: 04T2458-2 DATE: January 29, 2004 FCC ID: NM8VIVIDA SPATIAL PEAK SAR EVALUATION The procedure for spatial peak SAR evaluation has been implemented according to the IEEE1529 standard. It can be conducted for 1 g and 10 g. The DASY4 system allows evaluations that combine measured data and robot positions, such as: • maximum search • extrapolation • boundary correction • peak search for averaged SAR During a maximum search, global and local maximum searches are automatically performed in 2-D after each Area Scan measurement with at least 6 measurement points. It is based on the evaluation of the local SAR gradient calculated by the Quadratic Shepard’s method. The algorithm will find the global maximum and all local maxima within -2 dB of the global maxima for all SAR distributions. Extrapolation Extrapolation routines are used to obtain SAR values between the lowest measurement points and the inner phantom surface. The extrapolation distance is determined by the surface detection distance and the probe sensor offset. Several measurements at different distances are necessary for the extrapolation. Extrapolation routines require at least 10 measurement points in 3-D space. They are used in the Cube Scan to obtain SAR values between the lowest measurement points and the inner phantom surface. The routine uses the modified Quadratic Shepard’s method for extrapolation. For a grid using 5x5x7 measurement points with 5mm resolution amounting to 343 measurement points, the uncertainty of the extrapolation routines is less than 1% for 1 g and 10 g cubes. Boundary effect For measurements in the immediate vicinity of a phantom surface, the field coupling effects between the probe and the boundary influence the probe characteristics. Boundary effect errors of different dosimetric probe types have been analyzed by measurements and using a numerical probe model. As expected, both methods showed an enhanced sensitivity in the immediate vicinity of the boundary. The effect strongly depends on the probe dimensions and disappears with increasing distance from the boundary. The sensitivity can be approximately given as: Since the decay of the boundary effect dominates for small probes (a<<λ), the cos-term can be omitted. Factors Sb (parameter Alpha in the DASY4 software) and a (parameter Delta in the DASY4 software) are assessed during probe calibration and used for numerical compensation of the boundary effect. Several simulations and measurements have confirmed that the compensation is valid for different field and boundary configurations. This simple compensation procedure can largely reduce the probe uncertainty near boundaries. It works well as long as: • the boundary curvature is small • the probe axis is angled less than 30_ to the boundary normal • the distance between probe and boundary is larger than 25% of the probe diameter • the probe is symmetric (all sensors have the same offset from the probe tip) Since all of these requirements are fulfilled in a DASY4 system, the correction of the probe boundary effect in the vicinity of the phantom surface is performed in a fully automated manner via the measurement data extraction during postprocessing. COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION SERVICES Page: 11 of 32 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of CCS. This document may be altered or revised by Compliance Certification Services personnel only, and shall be noted in the revision section of the document.

REPORT NO: 04T2458-2 DATE: January 29, 2004 FCC ID: NM8VIVIDA 5. MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY UNCERTAINTY BUDGE ACCORDING TO IEEE P1528 Uncertainty Prob. (ci) (ci) Std. Std. (vi) Error Description Div. Value [%] Dist. 1g 10g Unc.(1g) Unc. (10g) veff Measurement System Probe Calibration ±4.8 N 1 1 1 ±4.8% ±4.8% ∞ Axial Isotropy ±4.7 R 3 0.7 0.7 ±1.9% ±1.9% ∞ Hemispherical Isotropy ±9.6 R 3 0.7 0.7 ±3.9% ±3.9% ∞ Boundary Effects ±1.0 R 3 1 1 ±0.6% ±0.6% ∞ Linearity ±4.7 R 3 1 1 ±2.7% ±2.7% ∞ System Detection Limits ±1.0 R 3 1 1 ±0.6% ±0.6% ∞ Readout Electronics ±1.0 N 3 1 1 ±1.0% ±1.0% ∞ Response Time ±0.8 R 3 1 1 ±0.5% ±0.5% ∞ Integration Time ±2.6 R 3 1 1 ±1.5% ±1.5% ∞ RF Ambient Condition ±1.59 R 3 1 1 ±0.9% ±0.9% ∞ Probe Positioner ±1.6 R 3 1 1 ±0.2% ±0.2% ∞ Probe Positioning ±2.9 R 3 1 1 ±1.7% ±1.7% ∞ Max. SAR Eval. ±1.0 R 3 1 1 ±0.6% ±0.6% ∞ Test sample Related Device Positioning ±1.1 N 1 1 1 ±1.1% ±1.1% 145 Device Holder ±3.6 N 1 1 1 ±3.6% ±3.6% 5 Power Drift ±5.0 R 3 1 1 ±2.9% ±2.9% ∞ Phantom and Setup Phantom Uncertainty ±4.0 R 3 1 1 ±2.3% ±2.3% ∞ Liquid Conductivity (target) ±5.0 R 3 0.64 0.43 ±1.8% ±1.2% ∞ Liquid Conductivity (meas.) ±2.5 N 1 0.64 0.43 ±1.6% ±1.1% ∞ Liquid Peermittivity (target) ±5.0 R 3 0.6 0.49 ±1.7% ±1.4% ∞ Liquid Permittivity (meas.) ±2.5 N 1 0.6 0.49 ±1.5% ±1.2% ∞ Combined Std. Uncertainty ±9.8% ±9.6% 330 Expanded STD Uncertainty ±19.6% ±19.2% Table: Worst-case uncertainty for DASY4 assessed according to IEEE P1528. The budge is valid for the frequency range 300MHz – 3GHz and represents a worst-case analysis. COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION SERVICES Page: 12 of 32 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of CCS. This document may be altered or revised by Compliance Certification Services personnel only, and shall be noted in the revision section of the document.

REPORT NO: 04T2458-2 DATE: January 29, 2004 FCC ID: NM8VIVIDA 6. EXPOSURE LIMIT (A) Limits for Occupational/Controlled Exposure (W/kg) Whole-Body Partial-Body Hands, Wrists, Feet and Ankles 0.4 8.0 20.0 (B) Limits for General Population/Uncontrolled Exposure (W/kg) Whole-Body Partial-Body Hands, Wrists, Feet and Ankles 0.08 1.6 4.0 NOTE 1: See Section 1 for discussion of exposure categories. NOTE 2: Whole-Body SAR is averaged over the entire body, partial-body SAR is averaged over any 1 gram of tissue defined as a tissue volume in the shape of a cube. SAR for hands, wrists, feet and ankles is averaged over any 10 grams of tissue defined as a tissue volume in the shape of a cube. NOTE 3: At frequencies above 6.0 GHz, SAR limits are not applicable and MPE limits for power density should be applied at 5 cm or more from the transmitting device. NOTE 4: The time averaging criteria for field strength and power density do not apply to general population SAR limit of 47 CFR §2.1093 NOTE GENERAL POPULATION/UNCONTROLLED EXPOSURE PARTIAL BODY LIMIT 1.6 mW/g COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION SERVICES Page: 13 of 32 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of CCS. This document may be altered or revised by Compliance Certification Services personnel only, and shall be noted in the revision section of the document.

REPORT NO: 04T2458-2 DATE: January 29, 2004 FCC ID: NM8VIVIDA 7. EUT ARRANGEMENT Please refer to IEEE P1528 illustration below. 7.1 ANTHROPOMORPHIC HEAD PHANTOM Figure 7-1a shows the front, back and side views of SAM. The point “M” is the reference point for the center of mouth, “LE” is the left ear reference point (ERP), and “RE” is the right ERP. The ERPs are 15 mm posterior to the entrance to ear canal (EEC) along the B-M line (Back-Mouth), as shown in Figure 7-1b. The plane passing through the two ear reference points and M is defined as the Reference Plane. The line N-F (Neck-Front) perpendicular to the reference plane and passing through the RE (or LE) is called the Reference Pivoting Line (see Figure 7-1c). Line B-M is perpendicular to the N-F line. Both N-F and B-M lines should be marked on the external phantom shell to facilitate handset positioning. Posterior to the N-F line, the thickness of the phantom shell with the shape of an ear is a flat surface 6 mm thick at the ERPs. Anterior to the N-F line, the ear is truncated as illustrated in Figure 7-1b. The ear truncation is introduced to avoid the handset from touching the ear lobe, which can cause unstable handset positioning at the cheek. Figure 7-1a Front, back and side view of SAM (model for the phantom shell) Figure 7-1b Figure 7-1c Close up side view of phantom showing the ear region Side view of the phantom showing relevant markings and the 7 cross sectional plane locations COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION SERVICES Page: 14 of 32 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of CCS. This document may be altered or revised by Compliance Certification Services personnel only, and shall be noted in the revision section of the document.

REPORT NO: 04T2458-2 DATE: January 29, 2004 FCC ID: NM8VIVIDA 7.2 DEFINITION OF THE “CHEEK/TOUCH” POSITION The “cheek” or “touch” position is defined as follows: a. Ready the handset for talk operation, if necessary. For example, for handsets with a cover piece, open the cover. (If the handset can also be used with the cover closed both configurations must be tested.) b. Define two imaginary lines on the handset: the vertical centerline and the horizontal line. The vertical centerline passes through two points on the front side of the handset: the midpoint of the width wt of the handset at the level of the acoustic output (point A on Figures 7-2a and 7-2b), and the midpoint of the width wb of the bottom of the handset (point B). The horizontal line is perpendicular to the vertical centerline and passes through the center of the acoustic output (see Figure 7-2a). The two lines intersect at point A. Note that for many handsets, point A coincides with the center of the acoustic output. However, the acoustic output may be located elsewhere on the horizontal line. Also note that the vertical centerline is not necessarily parallel to the front face of the handset (see Figure 7-2b), especially for clamshell handsets, handsets with flip pieces, and other irregularly-shaped handsets. c. Position the handset close to the surface of the phantom such that point A is on the (virtual) extension of the line passing through points RE and LE on the phantom (see Figure 7-2c), such that the plane defined by the vertical center line and the horizontal line of the handset is approximately parallel to the sagittal plane of the phantom. d. Translate the handset towards the phantom along the line passing through RE and LE until the handset touches the pinna. e. e) While maintaining the handset in this plane, rotate it around the LE-RE line until the vertical centerline is in the plane normal to MB-NF including the line MB (called the reference plane). f. Rotate the handset around the vertical centerline until the handset (horizontal line) is symmetrical with respect to the line NF. g. While maintaining the vertical centerline in the reference plane, keeping point A on the line passing through RE and LE and maintaining the handset contact with the pinna, rotate the handset about the line NF until any point on the handset is in contact with a phantom point below the pinna (cheek). See Figure 7-2c. The physical angles of rotation should be noted. Figure 7.2c Phone “cheek” or “touch” position. The reference points for the right ear (RE), left ear LE) and mouth (M), which define the reference plane for handset positioning, are indicated. COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION SERVICES Page: 15 of 32 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of CCS. This document may be altered or revised by Compliance Certification Services personnel only, and shall be noted in the revision section of the document.

REPORT NO: 04T2458-2 DATE: January 29, 2004 FCC ID: NM8VIVIDA Figure 7.2a Figure 7.2b 7.3 DEFINITION OF THE “TILTED” POSITION The “tilted” position is defined as follows: a. Repeat steps (a) – (g) of 7.2 to place the device in the “cheek position.” b. While maintaining the orientation of the handset move the handset away from the pinna along the line passing through RE and LE in order to enable a rotation of the handset by 15 degrees. c. Rotate the handset around the horizontal line by 15 degrees. d. While maintaining the orientation of the handset, move the handset towards the phantom on a line passing through RE and LE until any part of the handset touches the ear. The tilted position is obtained when the contact is on the pinna. If the contact is at any location other than the pinna (e.g., the antenna with the back of the phantom head), the angle of the handset should be reduced. In this case, the tilted position is obtained if any part of the handset is in contact with the pinna as well as a second part of the handset is contact with the phantom (e.g., the antenna with the back of the head). Figure 7-3 Phone “tilted” position. The reference points for the right ear (RE), left ear (LE) and mouth (M), which define the reference plane for handset positioning, are indicated. COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION SERVICES Page: 16 of 32 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of CCS. This document may be altered or revised by Compliance Certification Services personnel only, and shall be noted in the revision section of the document.

REPORT NO: 04T2458-2 DATE: January 29, 2004 FCC ID: NM8VIVIDA 8. MEASUREMENT RESULTS 8.1. SIMULATING LIQUIDS PARAMETER CHECK The simulating liquids should be checked at the beginning of a series of SAR measurements to determine of the dielectric parameters are within the tolerances of the specified target values. The relative permittivity and conductivity of the tissue material should be within ± 5% of the values given in the table below. 5% may not be easily achieved at certain frequencies. Under such circumstances, 10% tolerance may be used until more precise tissue recipes are available. TISSUE DIELECTRIC PARAMETERS FOR HEAD AND BODY PHANTOMS The head tissue dielectric parameters recommended by the IEEE SCC-34/SC-2 in P1528 have been incorporated in the following table. These head parameters are derived from planar layer models simulating the highest expected SAR for the dielectric properties and tissue thickness variations in a human head. Other head and body tissue parameters that have not been specified in P1528 are derived from the tissue dielectric parameters computed from the 4-Cole-Cole equations and extrapolated according to the head parameters specified in P1528. Head Body Target Frequency (MHz) εr σ (S/m) εr σ (S/m) 150 52.3 0.76 61.9 0.80 300 45.3 0.87 58.2 0.92 450 43.5 0.87 56.7 0.94 835 41.5 0.90 55.2 0.97 900 41.5 0.97 55.0 1.05 915 41.5 0.98 55.0 1.06 1450 40.5 1.20 54.0 1.30 1610 40.3 1.29 53.8 1.40 1800 – 2000 40.0 1.40 53.3 1.52 2450 39.2 1.80 52.7 1.95 3000 38.5 2.40 52.0 2.73 5800 35.3 5.27 48.2 6.00 (εr = relative permittivity, σ = conductivity and ρ = 1000 kg/m3) TYPICAL COMPOSITION OF INGREDIENTS FOR LIQUID TISSUE PHANTOMS The following tissue formulations are provided for reference only as some of the parameters have not been thoroughly verified. The composition of ingredients may be modified accordingly to achieve the desired target tissue parameters required for routine SAR evaluation. Ingredients Frequency (MHz) (% by weight) 450 835 915 1900 2450 Tissue Type Head Body Head Body Head Body Head Body Head Body Water 38.56 51.16 41.45 52.4 41.05 56.0 54.9 40.4 62.7 73.2 Salt (NaCl) 3.95 1.49 1.45 1.4 1.35 0.76 0.18 0.5 0.5 0.04 Sugar 56.32 46.78 56.0 45.0 56.5 41.76 0.0 58.0 0.0 0.0 HEC 0.98 0.52 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.21 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 Bactericide 0.19 0.05 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.27 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 Triton X-100 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 36.8 0.0 DGBE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 44.92 0.0 0.0 26.7 Dielectric Constant 43.42 58.0 42.54 56.1 42.0 56.8 39.9 54.0 39.8 52.5 Conductivity (S/m) 0.85 0.83 0.91 0.95 1.0 1.07 1.42 1.45 1.88 1.78 Salt: 99+% Pure Sodium Chloride Sugar: 98+% Pure Sucrose + Water: De-ionized, 16 MΩ resistivity HEC: Hydroxyethyl Cellulose DGBE: 99+% Di(ethylene glycol) butyl ether, [2-(2-butoxyethoxy)ethanol] Triton X-100 (ultra pure): Polyethylene glycol mono [4-(1,1, 3, 3-tetramethylbutyl)phenyl]ether COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION SERVICES Page: 17 of 32 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of CCS. This document may be altered or revised by Compliance Certification Services personnel only, and shall be noted in the revision section of the document.

REPORT NO: 04T2458-2 DATE: January 29, 2004 FCC ID: NM8VIVIDA SIMULATING LIQUIDS PARAMETER CHECK RESULTS Ambient condition: Temperature: 23.0°C; Relative humidity: 40% Date: January 29, 2004 Head Simulating Liquid Parameters Target Measured Deviation[%] Limited[%] f (MHz) Temp. [°C] Depth (cm) Permitivity: 41.5 42.0951 1.43 ±5 835 21.5 15 Conductivity: 0.9 0.9194 2.16 ±5 Ambient condition: Temperature: 23.0°C; Relative humidity: 40% Date: January 29, 2004 Body Simulating Liquid Parameters Target Measured Deviation[%] Limited[%] f (MHz) Temp. [°C] Depth (cm) Permitivity: 55.2 55.68 0.87 ±5 835 21.5 15 Conductivity: 0.97 0.9646 -0.56 ±5 Ambient condition: Temperature: 23.5°C; Relative humidity: 40% Date: January 29, 2004 Head Simulating Liquid Parameters Target Measured Deviation[%] Limited[%] f (MHz) Temp. [°C] Depth (cm) Permitivity: 40 40.0674 0.17 ±5 1900 22 15 Conductivity: 1.4 1.4568 4.06 ±5 Ambient condition: Temperature: 23.0°C; Relative humidity: 40% Date: January 29, 2004 Body Simulating Liquid Parameters Target Measured Deviation[%] Limited[%] f (MHz) Temp. [°C] Depth (cm) Permitivity: 53.3 52.83 -0.88 ±5 1900 22 15 Conductivity: 1.52 1.594 4.87 ±5 COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION SERVICES Page: 18 of 32 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of CCS. This document may be altered or revised by Compliance Certification Services personnel only, and shall be noted in the revision section of the document.

REPORT NO: 04T2458-2 DATE: January 29, 2004 FCC ID: NM8VIVIDA 8.2. SYSTEM PERFORMANCE CHECK The system performance check is performed prior to any usage of the system in order to guarantee reproducible results. The system performance check verifies that the system operates within its specifications. The system performance check results are tabulated below. And also the corresponding SAR plot is attached as well in the SAR plots files. SYSTEM PERFORMANCE CHECK MEASUREMENT CONDITIONS • The measurements were performed in the flat section of the SAM twin phantom filled with Head simulating liquid of the following parameters. • The DASY4 system with an Isotropic E-Field Probe ES3DV2-SN: 3021 was used for the measurements. • The dipole was mounted on the small tripod so that the dipole feed point was positioned below the center marking of the flat phantom section and the dipole was oriented parallel to the body axis (the long side of the phantom). The standard measuring distance was 10 mm (above 1 GHz) and 15 mm (below 1 GHz) from dipole center to the simulating liquid surface. • The coarse grid with a grid spacing of 15 mm was aligned with the dipole. • Special 5 x 5 x 7 fine cube was chosen for cube integration(dx=dy=7.5mm; dz=5mm). • Distance between probe sensors and phantom surface was set to 4 mm. • The dipole input power (forward power) was 250 mW±3%. • The results are normalized to 1 W input power. REFERENCE SAR VALUES The system performance check is performed prior to any usage of the system in order to guarantee reproducible results. The system performance check verifies that the system operates within its specifications of ±10%. The system performance check results are tabulated below. And also the corresponding SAR plot is attached as well in the SAR plots files. IEEE P1528 Recommended Reference Value Frequency Local SAR at surface Local SAR at surface 1 g SAR 10 g SAR (MHz) (Above feed point) (y=2cm offset from feed point) 300 3.0 2.0 4.4 2.1 450 4.9 3.3 7.2 3.2 835 9.5 6.2 14.1 4.9 900 10.8 6.9 16.4 5.4 1450 29.0 16.0 50.2 6.5 1800 38.1 19.8 69.5 6.8 1900 39.7 20.5 72.1 6.6 2450 52.4 24.0 104.2 7.7 3000 63.8 25.7 140.2 9.5 COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION SERVICES Page: 19 of 32 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of CCS. This document may be altered or revised by Compliance Certification Services personnel only, and shall be noted in the revision section of the document.

REPORT NO: 04T2458-2 DATE: January 29, 2004 FCC ID: NM8VIVIDA SYSTEM PERFORMANCE CHECK RESULTS Dipole: D900V2 SN: 108 Date: January 29, 2004 Ambient condition: Temperature: 23.0°C; Relative humidity: 40% H e a d S im ula ting L iq uid P a ra m e te rs T a rg e t M e a s ure d D e v ia tio n[% ] L im ite d [% ] f (M H z ) T e m p . [° C ] D e p th [c m ] P e rm itiv ity : 4 1 .5 4 1 .0 3 2 -1 .1 3 ± 5 900 2 2 .0 0 1 5 .0 0 C o nd uc tiv ity : 0 .9 7 0 .9 7 0 2 0 .0 2 ± 5 1g S A R : 1 0 .8 1 0 .8 4 0 .3 7 ± 10 Dipole: D1800V2 SN: 294 Date: January 29, 2004 Ambient condition: Temperature: 23.5°C; Relative humidity: 40% H e a d S im ula ting L iq uid P a ra m e te rs T a rg e t M e a s ure d D e v ia tio n[% ] L im ite d [% ] f (M H z ) T e m p . [°C ] D e p th [c m ] P e rm itiv ity : 40 4 0 .3 8 7 9 0 .9 7 ± 5 1800 2 1 .5 0 1 5 .0 0 C o nd uc tiv ity : 1 .4 1 .4 6 8 4 .8 6 ± 5 1g S A R : 3 8 .1 3 9 .4 0 3 .4 1 ± 10 COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION SERVICES Page: 20 of 32 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of CCS. This document may be altered or revised by Compliance Certification Services personnel only, and shall be noted in the revision section of the document.

REPORT NO: 04T2458-2 DATE: January 29, 2004 FCC ID: NM8VIVIDA 8.3. EUT TUNE-UP PROCEDURES The following procedures had been used to prepare the EUT for the SAR test. To setup the desire channel frequency and the maximum output power. A Wireless Communication Test Set “Aglient, model 8960 Series” was used to program the EUT. System config setting: Operating mode - Active Cell System Type - IS-2000 Cell Band - US Cellular (Rcvr Power Ctrl = 30 dBm) Cell Band - US PCS (Rcvr Power Ctrl = 30 dBm) Measurement Selection - Digital Average Power Maximum conducted power was measured by replacing the antenna with an RF cable for conductive measurements, before and after the SAR measurements was done. COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION SERVICES Page: 21 of 32 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of CCS. This document may be altered or revised by Compliance Certification Services personnel only, and shall be noted in the revision section of the document.

REPORT NO: 04T2458-2 DATE: January 29, 2004 FCC ID: NM8VIVIDA 8.4. SAR MEASUREMENT RESULTS 1. Left Touched Position CDMA Cellular Band: Duty Cycle: 100%, Crest Factor: 1 Depth of liquid: 15.0 cm EUT Frequency *Conducted Liquid SAR (1g) Limit Antenna Position Channel MHz Before After Temp_°C (W/kg) (W/kg) 1013 824.70 ** Left Fixed 384 836.52 24.02 23.85 21.50 0.355 1.6 Touched 777 848.31 ** CDMA PCS Band: Duty Cycle: 100%, Crest Factor: 1 Depth of liquid: 15.0 cm EUT Frequency *Conducted Liquid SAR (1g) Limit Antenna Position Channel MHz Before After Temp_°C (W/kg) (W/kg) 25 1851.25 ** Left Fixed 600 1880.00 24.75 24.60 21.50 0.748 1.6 Touched 1175 1908.75 ** Notes: 1. *: Average power 2. **: The SAR measured at the middle channel for this configuration is at least 3 dB lower than SAR limit, testing at the high and low channels is option. 3. Please refer to attachment for the result presentation in plot format. COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION SERVICES Page: 22 of 32 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of CCS. This document may be altered or revised by Compliance Certification Services personnel only, and shall be noted in the revision section of the document.

REPORT NO: 04T2458-2 DATE: January 29, 2004 FCC ID: NM8VIVIDA 2. Left Tilted Position CDMA Cellular Band: Duty Cycle: 100%, Crest Factor: 1 Depth of liquid: 15.0 cm EUT Frequency *Conducted Liquid SAR (1g) Limit Antenna Position Channel MHz Before After Temp_°C (W/kg) (W/kg) 1013 824.70 ** Left Tilted Fixed 384 836.52 24.02 23.85 21.50 0.331 1.6 777 848.31 ** CDMA PCS Band: Duty Cycle: 100%, Crest Factor: 1 Depth of liquid: 15.0 cm EUT Frequency *Conducted Liquid SAR (1g) Limit Antenna Position Channel MHz Before After Temp_°C (W/kg) (W/kg) 25 1851.25 24.30 24.15 22.00 1.04 Left Tilted Fixed 600 1880 24.75 24.60 22.00 1.18 1.6 1175 1908.75 24.22 24.10 22.00 0.788 Notes: 1. *: Average power 2. **: The SAR measured at the middle channel for this configuration is at least 3 dB lower than SAR limit, testing at the high and low channels is option. 3. Please refer to attachment for the result presentation in plot format. COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION SERVICES Page: 23 of 32 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of CCS. This document may be altered or revised by Compliance Certification Services personnel only, and shall be noted in the revision section of the document.

REPORT NO: 04T2458-2 DATE: January 29, 2004 FCC ID: NM8VIVIDA 3. Right Touched Position CDMA Cellular Band: Duty Cycle: 100%, Crest Factor: 1 Depth of liquid: 15.0 cm EUT Frequency *Conducted Liquid SAR (1g) Limit Antenna Position Channel MHz Before After Temp_°C (W/kg) (W/kg) 1013 824.70 24.05 23.90 21.50 0.550 Right Fixed 384 836.52 24.02 23.85 21.50 0.511 1.6 Touched 777 848.31 24.00 23.80 21.50 0.508 CDMA PCS Band: Duty Cycle: 100%, Crest Factor: 1 Depth of liquid: 15.0 cm EUT Frequency *Conducted Liquid SAR (1g) Limit Antenna Position Channel MHz Before After Temp_°C (W/kg) (W/kg) 25 1851.25 ** Right Fixed 600 1880 24.75 24.60 22.0 0.796 1.6 Touched 1175 1908.75 ** Notes: 1. *: Average power 2. **: The SAR measured at the middle channel for this configuration is at least 3 dB lower than SAR limit, testing at the high and low channels is option. 3. Please refer to attachment for the result presentation in plot format. COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION SERVICES Page: 24 of 32 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of CCS. This document may be altered or revised by Compliance Certification Services personnel only, and shall be noted in the revision section of the document.

REPORT NO: 04T2458-2 DATE: January 29, 2004 FCC ID: NM8VIVIDA 4. Right Tilted Position CDMA Cellular Band: Duty Cycle: 100%, Crest Factor: 1 Depth of liquid: 15.0 cm EUT Frequency *Conducted Liquid SAR (1g) Limit Antenna Position Channel MHz Before After Temp_°C (W/kg) (W/kg) 1013 824.70 24.05 23.90 ** Right Fixed 384 836.52 24.02 23.85 21.50 0.458 1.6 Tilted 777 848.31 24.00 23.80 ** CDMA PCS Band: Duty Cycle: 100%, Crest Factor: 1 Depth of liquid: 15.0 cm EUT Frequency *Conducted Liquid SAR (1g) Limit Antenna Position Channel MHz Before After Temp_°C (W/kg) (W/kg) 25 1851.25 24.30 24.15 22.0 1.13 Right Fixed 600 1880.00 24.75 24.60 22.0 1.35 1.6 Tilted 1175 1908.75 24.22 24.10 22.0 0.825 Notes: 1. *: Average power 2. **: The SAR measured at the middle channel for this configuration is at least 3 dB lower than SAR limit, testing at the high and low channels is option. 3. Please refer to attachment for the result presentation in plot format. COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION SERVICES Page: 25 of 32 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of CCS. This document may be altered or revised by Compliance Certification Services personnel only, and shall be noted in the revision section of the document.

REPORT NO: 04T2458-2 DATE: January 29, 2004 FCC ID: NM8VIVIDA 5. Body Worn Position CDMA Cellular Band: Duty Cycle: 100%, Crest Factor: 1 Depth of liquid: 15.0 cm Sep. Frequency *Conducted Liquid SAR (1g) Limit Antenna dist._cm Channel MHz Before After Temp_°C (W/kg) (W/kg) 1013 824.70 24.05 23.90 21.50 0.542 With Fixed 384 836.52 24.02 23.85 21.50 0.396 1.6 holster 777 848.31 24.00 23.80 21.50 0.368 CDMA PCS Band: Duty Cycle: 100%, Crest Factor: 1 Depth of liquid: 15.0 cm Conducted Sep. Frequency Liquid SAR (1g) Limit Antenna Pwr dBm dist._cm Channel MHz Before After Temp_°C (W/kg) (W/kg) 25 1851.25 24.30 24.15 22.00 0.466 With Fixed 600 1880.00 24.75 24.60 22.00 0.662 1.6 holster 1175 1908.75 24.22 24.10 22.00 0.417 Notes: 1. *: Average power 2. A separation distance of 0 cm between the back of the EUT (holster) and flat phantom. 3. The Ear-microphone wire connected to the phone to simulate hands-free operation in a body-worn configuration. 4. Please refer to attachment for the result presentation in plot format. COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION SERVICES Page: 26 of 32 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of CCS. This document may be altered or revised by Compliance Certification Services personnel only, and shall be noted in the revision section of the document.



fi mones O

REPORT NO: 04T2458-2 DATE: January 29, 2004 FCC ID: NM8VIVIDA 10. EQUIPMENT LIST & CALIBRATION STATUS Name of Equipment Manufacturer Type/Model Serial Number Cal. Due date S-Parameter Network Analyzer Agilent 8753ES-6 US39173569 8/8/04 Electronic Probe kit Hewlett Packard 85070C N/A N/A Signal General HP 83732B US34490599 4/4/04 Power Meter Giga-tronics 8651A 8651404 5/12/04 Power Sensor Giga-tronics 80701A 1834588 2/18/04 Amplifier Mini-Circuits ZVE-8G 0360 N/A Amplifier Mini-Circuits ZHL-42W D072701-5 N/A Wireless Communication Test Set Agilent 8960 GP43344809 9/22/05 Radio Communication Tester Rohde & Schwarz CMU 200 838114/032 2/14/04 Data Acquisition Electronics (DAE) SPEAG DAE3 V1 427 2/4/04 Dosimetric E-Field Probe SPEAG ES3DV2 3021 7/29/04 System Validation Dipole SPEAG D900V2 108 4/10/04 System Validation Dipole SPEAG D1800V2 294 4/19/04 Probe Alignment Unit SPEAG LB (V2) 261 N/A Robot Staubli RX90B L F00/5H31A1/A/01 N/A SAM Twin Phantom SPEAG TP-1785 QD 000 P40 CA N/A SAM Twin Phantom SPEAG TP-1015 N/A N/A Simulating Liquids SPEAG H1800 N/A Within 24 hrs of first test Simulating Liquids SPEAG H1900 N/A Within 24 hrs of first test Simulating Liquids SPEAG M1900 N/A Within 24 hrs of first test Simulating Liquids SPEAG H900 N/A Within 24 hrs of first test Simulating Liquids SPEAG H835 N/A Within 24 hrs of first test Simulating Liquids SPEAG M835 N/A Within 24 hrs of first test COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION SERVICES Page: 30 of 32 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of CCS. This document may be altered or revised by Compliance Certification Services personnel only, and shall be noted in the revision section of the document.

REPORT NO: 04T2458-2 DATE: January 29, 2004 FCC ID: NM8VIVIDA 11. REFERENCES [1] Federal Communications Commission, \Report and order: Guidelines for evaluating the environ- mental effects of radiofrequency radiation", Tech. Rep. FCC 96-326, FCC, Washington, D.C. 20554, 1996. [2] David L. Means Kwok Chan, Robert F. Cleveland, \Evaluating compliance with FCC guidelines for human exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields", Tech. Rep., Federal Communication Commision, O_ce of Engineering & Technology, Washington, DC, 1997. [3] Thomas Schmid, Oliver Egger, and Niels Kuster, \Automated E-_eld scanning system for dosimetric assessments", IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 44, pp. 105{113, Jan. 1996. [4] Niels Kuster, Ralph K.astle, and Thomas Schmid, \Dosimetric evaluation of mobile communications equipment with known precision", IEICE Transactions on Communications, vol. E80-B, no. 5, pp. 645{652, May 1997. [5] CENELEC, \Considerations for evaluating of human exposure to electromagnetic fields (EMFs) from mobile telecommunication equipment (MTE) in the frequency range 30MHz - 6GHz", Tech. Rep., CENELEC, European Committee for Electrotechnical Standardization, Brussels, 1997. [6] ANSI, ANSI/IEEE C95.1-1992: IEEE Standard for Safety Levels with Respect to Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields, 3 kHz to 300 GHz, The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc., New York, NY 10017, 1992. [7] Katja Pokovic, Thomas Schmid, and Niels Kuster, \Robust setup for precise calibration of E-_eld probes in tissue simulating liquids at mobile communications frequencies", in ICECOM _ 97, Dubrovnik, October 15{17, 1997, pp. 120{124. [8] Katja Pokovic, Thomas Schmid, and Niels Kuster, \E-_eld probe with improved isotropy in brain simulating liquids", in Proceedings of the ELMAR, Zadar, Croatia, 23{25 June, 1996, pp. 172{175. [9] Volker Hombach, Klaus Meier, Michael Burkhardt, Eberhard K. uhn, and Niels Kuster, \The dependence of EM energy absorption upon human head modeling at 900 MHz", IEEE Transactions onMicrowave Theory and Techniques, vol. 44, no. 10, pp. 1865{1873, Oct. 1996. [10] Klaus Meier, Ralf Kastle, Volker Hombach, Roger Tay, and Niels Kuster, \The dependence of EM energy absorption upon human head modeling at 1800 MHz", IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, Oct. 1997, in press. [11] W. Gander, Computermathematik, Birkhaeuser, Basel, 1992. [12] W. H. Press, S. A. Teukolsky,W. T. Vetterling, and B. P. Flannery, Numerical Recepies in C, The Art of Scientific Computing, Second Edition, Cambridge University Press, 1992..Dosimetric Evaluation of Sample device, month 1998 9 [13] NIS81 NAMAS, \The treatment of uncertainity in EMC measurement", Tech. Rep., NAMAS Executive, National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, Middlesex, England, 1994. [14] Barry N. Taylor and Christ E. Kuyatt, \Guidelines for evaluating and expressing the uncertainty of NIST measurement results", Tech. Rep., National Institute of Standards and Technology, 1994. Dosimetric Evaluation of Sample device, month 1998 10 COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION SERVICES Page: 31 of 32 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of CCS. This document may be altered or revised by Compliance Certification Services personnel only, and shall be noted in the revision section of the document.

REPORT NO: 04T2458-2 DATE: January 29, 2004 FCC ID: NM8VIVIDA 12. ATTACHMENTS No. Contents No. of page (s) 1 System Performance Check Plots 4 2-1 SAR Test Plots - Cellular band 14 2-2 SAR Test Plots - PCS band 16 3 Probe_ES3DV2-SN: 3021 13 4 System Validation Dipole - D900V2 SN: 108 7 5 System Validation Dipole - D1800V2 S/N: 294 6 END OF REPORT COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION SERVICES Page: 32 of 32 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of CCS. This document may be altered or revised by Compliance Certification Services personnel only, and shall be noted in the revision section of the document.


Document Created: 2004-01-29 20:21:28
Document Modified: 2004-01-29 20:21:28
© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC