SAR Report

FCC ID: NM8BG

RF Exposure Info

Download: PDF
FCCID_579026

Compliance Certification Services Inc. Report No: 50630102-SF FCC ID: NM8BG Date of Issue: Jul 5, 2005 ANSI/IEEE Std. C95.1-1992 in accordance with the requirements of FCC Report and Order: ET Docket 93-62, and OET Bulletin 65 Supplement C IC Report and Order: RSS-102 FCC TEST REPORT For Pocket PC Trade Name: HP Model: HSTNH-H09C-WL Issued to HIGH TECH COMPUTER CORP. 23 Hsin Hua Rd, Taoyuan,R.O.C. Issued by Compliance Certification Services Inc. No. 11, Wu-Kung 6 Rd, Wu-Ku Hsiang, Wu-Ku Industrial District, Taipei Hsien, (248) Taiwan. TEL: 886-2-2299-9720 FAX: 886-2-2299-9721 Note: This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Compliance Certification Services Inc. This document may be altered or revised by Compliance Certification Services Inc. personnel only, and shall be noted in the revision section of the document. Page 1 Total Page: 24 Rev. 00

Compliance Certification Services Inc. Report No: 50630102-SF Date of Issue: Jul 5, 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. EUT DESCRIPTION ....................................................................................................................4 2. REQUIREMENTS FOR COMPLIANCE TESTING DEFINED BY THE FCC.........................5 3. DOSIMETRIC ASSESSMENT SYSTEM ...................................................................................5 3.1 MEASUREMENT SYSTEM DIAGRAM....................................................................................6 3.2 SYSTEM COMPONENTS ...........................................................................................................7 4. EVALUATION PROCEDURES ..................................................................................................9 5. MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY .........................................................................................13 6. EXPOSURE LIMIT ....................................................................................................................14 7. TYPICAL COMPOSITION OF INGREDIENTS FOR LIQUID TISSUE PHANTOMS .........14 8. MEASUREMENT RESULTS ....................................................................................................15 8.1 SYSTEM PERFORMANCE CHECK ................................................................................................ 15 8.2 TEST LIQUID CONFIRMATION...................................................................................................... 16 8.3 EUT TUNE-UP PROCEDURES ......................................................................................................... 17 8.4 SAR MEASUREMENTS RESULTS.................................................................................................. 17 9. EUT PHOTOS ............................................................................................................................20 10. EQUIPMENT LIST & CALIBRATION STATUS ....................................................................22 11. FACILITIES ...............................................................................................................................23 12. REFERENCES............................................................................................................................23 13. ATTACHMENTS .......................................................................................................................24 Page 2 Rev. 00

Compliance Certification Services Inc. Report No: 50630102—8F Date ofIssue: Jul 5, 2005 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE (SAR EVALUATION) Applicant: HIGH TECH COMPUTER CORP. 22 Chungshan N. Rd., 3 Sec. Equipment Under Test: Pocket PC Trade Name: HP Model Number: HSTNH—HO9C—WL Date of Test: July 5, 2005 Device Category: PORTABLE DEVICES Exposure Category: GENERAL POPULATION/UNCONTROLLED EXPOSURE APPLICABLE STANDARDS STANDARD TEST RESULT k6 OEIE ;Ssz'_lfg;emem & No non—compliancenoted Deviation from Applicable Standard None The device was tested by Compliance Certification Services Inc. in accordance with the measurement methods and procedures specified in OET Bulletin 65 Supplement C (Edition 01—01). The test results in this report apply only to thetested sample ofthe stated device/equipment. Other similar device/equipment will not necessarily produce the sameresults due to production tolerance and measurement uncertainties. Approved by: Reviewed by: Harris W. Lai Chris Hsich Executive Vice President Section Manager Compliance Certification Services Inc. Compliance Certification Services Inc. Page3 Rev. 00

Compliance Certification Services Inc. Report No: 50630102-SF Date of Issue: Jul 5, 2005 1. EUT DESCRIPTION Product Pocket PC Trade Name HP Model Number HSTNH-H09C-WL Model Discrepancy N/A Frequency Range 802.11b: 2412 ~ 2462 MHz Max. O/P Power: (Conducted/Average) 802.11b: 15.31dBm Max. SAR (1g): 802.11b: 0.536 W/kg Modulation Technique 802.11b: Direct Sequence Spread Spectrum (DSSS) Antenna Specification Antenna type: Main antenna: PIFA antenna Battery option: Only one type / model with EUT Remark: The sample selected for test was prototype that approximated to production product and was provided by manufacturer. Page 4 Rev. 00

Compliance Certification Services Inc. Report No: 50630102-SF Date of Issue: Jul 5, 2005 2. REQUIREMENTS FOR COMPLIANCE TESTING DEFINED BY THE FCC The US Federal Communications Commission has released the report and order “Guidelines for Evaluating the Environmental Effects of RF Radiation", ET Docket No. 93-62 in August 1996 [1]. The order requires routine SAR evaluation prior to equipment authorization of portable transmitter devices, including portable telephones. For consumer products, the applicable limit is 1.6 mW/g for an uncontrolled environment and 8.0 mW/g for an occupational/controlled environment as recommended by the ANSI/IEEE standard C95.1-1992 [6]. According to the Supplement C of OET Bulletin 65 “Evaluating Compliance with FCC Guide-lines for Human Exposure to Radio frequency Electromagnetic Fields", released on Jun 29, 2001 by the FCC, the device should be evaluated at maximum output power (radiated from the antenna) under “worst-case” conditions for normal or intended use, incorporating normal antenna operating positions, device peak performance frequencies and positions for maximum RF energy coupling. 3. DOSIMETRIC ASSESSMENT SYSTEM These measurements were performed with the automated near-field scanning system DASY4 from Schmid & Partner Engineering AG (SPEAG). The system is based on a high precision robot (working range greater than 0.9 m) which positions the probes with a positional repeatability of better than ± 0.02 mm. Special E- and H-field probes have been developed for measurements close to material discontinuity, the sensors of which are directly loaded with a Schottky diode and connected via highly resistive lines to the data acquisition unit. The SAR measurements were conducted with the dosimetric probe EX3DV4-SN: 3554 (manufactured by SPEAG), designed in the classical triangular configuration and optimized for dosimetric evaluation. The probe has been calibrated according to the procedure with accuracy of better than ±10%. The spherical isotropy was evaluated with the procedure and found to be better than ±0.25 dB. The phantom used was the SAM Twin Phantom as described in FCC supplement C, IEEE P1528 and EN50361. Page 5 Rev. 00

Compliance Certification Services Inc. Report No: 50630102-SF Date of Issue: Jul 5, 2005 3.1 MEASUREMENT SYSTEM DIAGRAM The DASY4 system for performing compliance tests consists of the following items: • A standard high precision 6-axis robot (St¨aubli RX family) with controller, teach pendant and software. An arm extension for accommodating the data acquisition electronics (DAE). • A dosimetric probe, i.e., an isotropic E-field probe optimized and calibrated for usage in tissue simulating liquid. The probe is equipped with an optical surface detector system. • A data acquisition electronics (DAE) which performs the signal amplification, signal multiplexing, AD-conversion, offset measurements, mechanical surface detection, collision detection, etc. The unit is battery powered with standard or rechargeable batteries. The signal is optically transmitted to the EOC. • The Electro-optical converter (EOC) performs the conversion between optical and electrical of the signals for the digital communication to the DAE and for the analog signal from the optical surface detection. The EOC is connected to the measurement server. • The function of the measurement server is to perform the time critical tasks such as signal filtering, control of the robot operation and fast movement interrupts. • A probe alignment unit which improves the (absolute) accuracy of the probe positioning. • A computer operating Windows 2000 or Windows XP. • DASY4 software. • Remote control with teach pendant and additional circuitry for robot safety such as warning lamps, etc. • The SAM twin phantom enabling testing left-hand and right-hand usage. • The device holder for handheld mobile phones. • Tissue simulating liquid mixed according to the given recipes. • Validation dipole kits allowing validating the proper functioning of the system. Page 6 Rev. 00

Compliance Certification Services Inc. Report No: 50630102-SF Date of Issue: Jul 5, 2005 3.2 SYSTEM COMPONENTS DASY4 Measurement Server The DASY4 measurement server is based on a PC/104 CPU board with a 166MHz low-power Pentium, 32MB chip disk and 64MB RAM. The necessary circuits for communication with either the DAE3 electronic box as well as the 16-bit AD-converter system for optical detection and digital I/O interface are contained on the DASY4 I/O-board, which is directly connected to the PC/104 bus of the CPU board. The measurement server performs all real-time data evaluation for field measurements and surface detection, controls robot movements and handles safety operation. The PC-operating system cannot interfere with these time critical processes. All connections are supervised by a watchdog, and disconnection of any of the cables to the measurement server will automatically disarm the robot and disable all program-controlled robot movements. Furthermore, the measurement server is equipped with two expansion slots which are reserved for future applications. Please note that the expansion slots do not have a standardized pinout and therefore only the expansion cards provided by SPEAG can be inserted. Expansion cards from any other supplier could seriously damage the measurement server. Calibration: No calibration required. Data Acquisition Electronics (DAE) The data acquisition electronics (DAE3) consists of a highly sensitive electrometer grade preamplifier with auto-zeroing, a channel and gain- switching multiplexer, a fast 16 bit AD converter and a command decoder and control logic unit. Transmission to the measurement server is accomplished through an optical downlink for data and status information as well as an optical uplink for commands and the clock. The mechanical probe mounting device includes two different sensor systems for frontal and sideways probe contacts. They are used for mechanical surface detection and probe collision detection. The input impedance of the DAE3 box is 200MOhm; the inputs are symmetrical and floating. Common mode rejection is above 80 dB. EX3DV4 Isotropic E-Field Probe for Dosimetric Measurements Construction: Symmetrical design with triangular core Built-in shielding against static charges PEEK enclosure material (resistant to organic solvents, e.g., DGBE) Calibration: Basic Broad Band Calibration in air: 10-3000 MHz. Conversion Factors (CF) for HSL 900 and HSL 1800 CF-Calibration for other liquids and frequencies upon request. Frequency: 10 MHz to > 6 GHz; Linearity: ± 0.2 dB (30 MHz to 3 GHz) Directivity: ± 0.3 dB in HSL (rotation around probe axis) ± 0.5 dB in HSL (rotation normal to probe axis) Dynamic Range: 10 µW/g to > 100 mW/g; Linearity: ± 0.2 dB (noise: typically < 1 µW/g) Dimensions: Overall length: 330 mm (Tip: 20 mm) Tip diameter: 2.5 mm (Body: 12 mm) Distance from probe tip to dipole centers: 1 mm Application: High precision dosimetric measurements in any exposure scenario (e.g., very strong gradient fields). Only probe which enables compliance testing for frequencies up to 6 GHz with precision of better 30%. Interior of probe E-Field probe EX3DV4 Page 7 Rev. 00

Compliance Certification Services Inc. Report No: 50630102-SF Date of Issue: Jul 5, 2005 SAM Phantom (V4.0) Construction: The shell corresponds to the specifications of the Specific Anthropomorphic Mannequin (SAM) phantom defined in IEEE 1528-200X, CENELEC 50361 and IEC 62209. It enables the dosimetric evaluation of left and right hand phone usage as well as body mounted usage at the flat phantom region. A cover prevents evaporation of the liquid. Reference markings on the phantom allow the complete setup of all predefined phantom positions and measurement grids by manually teaching three points with the robot. Shell Thickness: 2 ±0.2 mm Filling Volume: Approx. 25 liters Dimensions: Height: 810mm; Length: 1000mm; Width: 500mm Device Holder for SAM Twin Phantom Construction: In combination with the Twin SAM Phantom V4.0 or Twin SAM, the Mounting Device (made from POM) enables the rotation of the mounted transmitter in spherical coordinates, whereby the rotation point is the ear opening. The devices can be easily and accurately positioned according to IEC, IEEE, CENELEC, FCC or other specifications. The device holder can be locked at different phantom locations (left head, right head, and flat phantom). System Validation Kits Construction: Symmetrical dipole with l/4 balun Enables measurement of feedpoint impedance with NWA Matched for use near flat phantoms filled with brain simulating solutions Includes distance holder and tripod adaptor. Frequency: 450, 900, 1800, 2450, 5800 MHz Return loss: > 20 dB at specified validation position Power capability: > 100 W (f < 1GHz); > 40 W (f > 1GHz) Dimensions: 450V2: dipole length: 270 mm; overall height: 330 mm D900V2: dipole length: 149 mm; overall height: 330 mm D1800V2: dipole length: 72 mm; overall height: 300 mm D2450V2: dipole length: 51.5 mm; overall height: 300 mm D5GHzV2: dipole length: 25.5 mm; overall height: 290 mm Page 8 Rev. 00

Compliance Certification Services Inc. Report No: 50630102-SF Date of Issue: Jul 5, 2005 4. EVALUATION PROCEDURES DATA EVALUATION The DASY4 post processing software (SEMCAD) automatically executes the following procedures to calculate the field units from the microvolt readings at the probe connector. The parameters used in the evaluation are stored in the configuration modules of the software: Probe parameters: - Sensitivity Normi, ai0, ai1, ai2 - Conversion factor ConvFi - Diode compression point dcpi Device parameters: - Frequency f - Crest factor cf Media parameters: - Conductivity σ - Density ρ These parameters must be set correctly in the software. They can be found in the component documents or be imported into the software from the configuration files issued for the DASY components. In the direct measuring mode of the multi-meter option, the parameters of the actual system setup are used. In the scan visualization and export modes, the parameters stored in the corresponding document files are used. The first step of the evaluation is a linearization of the filtered input signal to account for the compression characteristics of the detector diode. The compensation depends on the input signal, the diode type and the DC- transmission factor from the diode to the evaluation electronics. If the exciting field is pulsed, the crest factor of the signal must be known to correctly compensate for peak power. The formula for each channel can be given as: 2 cf V =U +U i i i ⋅ dcp i with Vi = Compensated signal of channel i (i = x, y, z) Ui = Input signal of channel i (i = x, y, z) cf = Crest factor of exciting field (DASY parameter) dcpi = Diode compression point (DASY parameter) From the compensated input signals the primary field data for each channel can be evaluated: E-field probes: V E = i i Norm • ConvF i 2 H-field probes: a +a f +a f i10 i11 i12 H i = Vi ⋅ f with Vi = Compensated signal of channel i (i = x, y, z) Normi = Sensor sensitivity of channel i (i = x, y, z) µV/(V/m)2 for E0field Probes ConvF = Sensitivity enhancement in solution aij = Sensor sensitivity factors for H-field probes f = Carrier frequency (GHz) Ei = Electric field strength of channel i in V/m Hi = Magnetic field strength of channel i in A/m Page 9 Rev. 00

Compliance Certification Services Inc. Report No: 50630102-SF Date of Issue: Jul 5, 2005 The RSS value of the field components gives the total field strength (Hermitian magnitude): 2 2 2 E tot = E +E +E x y z The primary field data are used to calculate the derived field units. 2 σ SAR = E ⋅ tot ρ ⋅1000 with SAR = local specific absorption rate in mW/g Etot = total field strength in V/m σ = conductivity in [mho/m] or [Siemens/m] ρ = equivalent tissue density in g/cm3 Note that the density is normally set to 1 (or 1.06), to account for actual brain density rather than the density of the simulation liquid. The power flow density is calculated assuming the excitation field as a free space field. 2 E or P 2 = H tot ⋅ 37.7 P = tot pwe pwe 3770 with Ppwe = Equivalent power density of a plane wave in mW/cm2 Etot = total electric field strength in V/m Htot = total magnetic field strength in A/m Page 10 Rev. 00

Compliance Certification Services Inc. Report No: 50630102-SF Date of Issue: Jul 5, 2005 SAR MEASUREMENT PROCEDURES The procedure for assessing the peak spatial-average SAR value consists of the following steps: • Power Reference Measurement The reference and drift jobs are useful jobs for monitoring the power drift of the device under test in the batch process. Both jobs measure the field at a specified reference position, at a selectable distance from the phantom surface. The reference position can be either the selected section’s grid reference point or a user point in this section. The reference job projects the selected point onto the phantom surface, orients the probe perpendicularly to the surface, and approaches the surface using the selected detection method. • Area Scan The area scan is used as a fast scan in two dimensions to find the area of high field values, before doing a finer measurement around the hot spot. The sophisticated interpolation routines implemented in DASY4 software can find the maximum locations even in relatively coarse grids. The scan area is defined by an editable grid. This grid is anchored at the grid reference point of the selected section in the phantom. When the area scan’s property sheet is brought-up, grid was at to 15 mm by 15 mm and can be edited by a user. • Zoom Scan Zoom scans are used to assess the peak spatial SAR values within a cubic averaging volume containing 1 g and 10 g of simulated tissue. The default zoom scan measures 5x5x7 points within a cube whose base faces are centered around the maximum found in a preceding area scan job within the same procedure. If the preceding Area Scan job indicates more then one maximum, the number of Zoom Scans has to be enlarged accordingly (The default number inserted is 1). • Power Drift measurement The drift job measures the field at the same location as the most recent reference job within the same procedure, and with the same settings. The drift measurement gives the field difference in dB from the reading conducted within the last reference measurement. Several drift measurements are possible for one reference measurement. This allows a user to monitor the power drift of the device under test within a batch process. In the properties of the Drift job, the user can specify a limit for the drift and have DASY4 software stop the measurements if this limit is exceeded. • Z-Scan The Z Scan job measures points along a vertical straight line. The line runs along the Z-axis of a one- dimensional grid. A user can anchor the grid to the current probe location. As with any other grids, the local Z- axis of the anchor location establishes the Z-axis of the grid. Page 11 Rev. 00

Compliance Certification Services Inc. Report No: 50630102-SF Date of Issue: Jul 5, 2005 SPATIAL PEAK SAR EVALUATION The procedure for spatial peak SAR evaluation has been implemented according to the IEEE1529 standard. It can be conducted for 1 g and 10 g. The DASY4 system allows evaluations that combine measured data and robot positions, such as: • maximum search • extrapolation • boundary correction • peak search for averaged SAR During a maximum search, global and local maximum searches are automatically performed in 2-D after each Area Scan measurement with at least 6 measurement points. It is based on the evaluation of the local SAR gradient calculated by the Quadratic Shepard’s method. The algorithm will find the global maximum and all local maxima within -2 dB of the global maxima for all SAR distributions. Extrapolation Extrapolation routines are used to obtain SAR values between the lowest measurement points and the inner phantom surface. The extrapolation distance is determined by the surface detection distance and the probe sensor offset. Several measurements at different distances are necessary for the extrapolation. Extrapolation routines require at least 10 measurement points in 3-D space. They are used in the Cube Scan to obtain SAR values between the lowest measurement points and the inner phantom surface. The routine uses the modified Quadratic Shepard’s method for extrapolation. For a grid using 5x5x7 measurement points with 5mm resolution amounting to 343 measurement points, the uncertainty of the extrapolation routines is less than 1% for 1 g and 10 g cubes. Boundary effect For measurements in the immediate vicinity of a phantom surface, the field coupling effects between the probe and the boundary influence the probe characteristics. Boundary effect errors of different dosimetric probe types have been analyzed by measurements and using a numerical probe model. As expected, both methods showed an enhanced sensitivity in the immediate vicinity of the boundary. The effect strongly depends on the probe dimensions and disappears with increasing distance from the boundary. The sensitivity can be approximately given as: Since the decay of the boundary effect dominates for small probes (a<<λ), the cos-term can be omitted. Factors Sb (parameter Alpha in the DASY4 software) and a (parameter Delta in the DASY4 software) are assessed during probe calibration and used for numerical compensation of the boundary effect. Several simulations and measurements have confirmed that the compensation is valid for different field and boundary configurations. This simple compensation procedure can largely reduce the probe uncertainty near boundaries. It works well as long as: • the boundary curvature is small • the probe axis is angled less than 30_ to the boundary normal • the distance between probe and boundary is larger than 25% of the probe diameter • the probe is symmetric (all sensors have the same offset from the probe tip) Since all of these requirements are fulfilled in a DASY4 system, the correction of the probe boundary effect in the vicinity of the phantom surface is performed in a fully automated manner via the measurement data extraction during postprocessing. Page 12 Rev. 00

Compliance Certification Services Inc. Report No: 50630102-SF Date of Issue: Jul 5, 2005 5. MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY UNCERTAINTY BUDGE ACCORDING TO IEEE P1528 Standard Uncertainty Probability Error Description Value ±% Divisor C1 1g unc.(1g/10g) V1 or Veff distribution ±% Measurement System Probe calibration ±4.8 normal 1 1 ±4.8 ∞ 1/2 Axial isotropy of probe ±4.6 rectangular √3 (1-Cp) ±1.9 ∞ Sph. Isotropy of probe ±9.7 rectangular √3 (Cp)1/2 ±3.9 ∞ Probe linearity ±4.5 rectangular √3 1 ±2.7 ∞ Detection Limit ±0.9 rectangular √3 1 ±0.6 ∞ Boundary effects ±8.5 rectangular √3 1 ±4.8 ∞ Readoutelectronics ±1.0 normal 1 1 ±1.0 ∞ Response time ±0.9 rectangular √3 1 ±0.5 ∞ Integration time ±1.2 rectangular √3 1 ±0.8 ∞ Mech Constrains of robot ±0.5 rectangular √3 1 ±0.2 ∞ Probe positioning ±2.7 rectangular √3 1 ±1.7 ∞ Extrap. And integration ±4.0 rectangular √3 1 ±2.3 ∞ RF ambient conditiona ±0.54 rectangular √3 1 ±0.43 ∞ Test Sample Related Device positioning ±2.2 normal 1 1 ±2.23 11 Device holder uncertainty ±5 normal 1 1 ±5.0 7 Power drift ±5 rectangular √3 1 ±2.9 ∞ Phantom and Set up Phantom uncertainty ±4 rectangular √3 1 ±2.3 ∞ Liquid conductivity ±5 rectangular √3 0.6 ±1.7 ∞ Liquid conductivity ±5 rectangular √3 0.6 ±3.5/1.7 ∞ Liquid permittivity ±5 rectangular √3 0.6 ±1.7 ∞ Liquid permittivity ±5 rectangular √3 0.6 ±1.7 ∞ Combined Standard Uncertainty ±12.14/11.76 Coverage Factor for 95% kp=2 Expanded Standard Uncertainty ±24.29/23.51 Table: Worst-case uncertainty for DASY4 assessed according to IEEE P1528. The budge is valid for the frequency range 300 MHz to 6G Hz and represents a worst-case analysis. Page 13 Rev. 00

Compliance Certification Services Inc. Report No: 50630102-SF Date of Issue: Jul 5, 2005 6. EXPOSURE LIMIT (A). Limits for Occupational/Controlled Exposure (W/kg) Whole-Body Partial-Body Hands, Wrists, Feet and Ankles 0.4 8.0 2.0 (B). Limits for General Population/Uncontrolled Exposure (W/kg) Whole-Body Partial-Body Hands, Wrists, Feet and Ankles 0.08 1.6 4.0 NOTE: Whole-Body SAR is averaged over the entire body, partial-body SAR is averaged over any 1 gram of tissue defined as a tissue volume in the shape of a cube. SAR for hands, wrists, feet and ankles is averaged over any 10 grams of tissue defined as a tissue volume in the shape of a cube. Population/Uncontrolled Environments: are defined as locations where there is the exposure of individuals who have no knowledge or control of their exposure. Occupational/Controlled Environments: are defined as locations where there is exposure that may be incurred by people who are aware of the potential for exposure, (i.e. as a result of employment or occupation). NOTE GENERAL POPULATION/UNCONTROLLED EXPOSURE PARTIAL BODY LIMIT 1.6 W/kg 7. TYPICAL COMPOSITION OF INGREDIENTS FOR LIQUID TISSUE PHANTOMS The following tissue formulations are provided for reference only as some of the parameters have not been thoroughly verified. The composition of ingredients may be modified accordingly to achieve the desired target tissue parameters required for routine SAR evaluation. Ingredients Frequency (MHz) (% by weight) 450 835 915 1900 2450 Tissue Type Head Body Head Body Head Body Head Body Head Body Water 38.56 51.16 41.45 52.4 41.05 56.0 54.9 40.4 62.7 73.2 Salt (NaCl) 3.95 1.49 1.45 1.4 1.35 0.76 0.18 0.5 0.5 0.04 Sugar 56.32 46.78 56.0 45.0 56.5 41.76 0.0 58.0 0.0 0.0 HEC 0.98 0.52 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.21 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 Bactericide 0.19 0.05 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.27 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 Triton X-100 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 36.8 0.0 DGBE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 44.92 0.0 0.0 26.7 Dielectric Constant 43.42 58.0 42.54 56.1 42.0 56.8 39.9 54.0 39.8 52.5 Conductivity (S/m) 0.85 0.83 0.91 0.95 1.0 1.07 1.42 1.45 1.88 1.78 Salt: 99+% Pure Sodium Chloride Sugar: 98+% Pure Sucrose + Water: De-ionized, 16 MΩ resistivity HEC: Hydroxyethyl Cellulose DGBE: 99+% Di(ethylene glycol) butyl ether, [2-(2-butoxyethoxy)ethanol] Triton X-100 (ultra pure): Polyethylene glycol mono [4-(1, 1, 3, 3-tetramethylbutyl)phenyl]ether Page 14 Rev. 00

Compliance Certification Services Inc. Report No: 50630102-SF Date of Issue: Jul 5, 2005 8. MEASUREMENT RESULTS 8.1 SYSTEM PERFORMANCE CHECK The system performance check is performed prior to any usage of the system in order to guarantee reproducible results. The system performance check verifies that the system operates within its specifications. The system performance check results are tabulated below. And also the corresponding SAR plot is attached as well in the SAR plots files. SYSTEM PERFORMANCE CHECK MEASUREMENT CONDITIONS • The measurements were performed in the flat section of the SAM twin phantom filled with Body simulating liquid of the following parameters. • The DASY4 system with an E-fileld probe EX3DV4 SN: 3554 was used for the measurements. • The dipole was mounted on the small tripod so that the dipole feed point was positioned below the center marking of the flat phantom section and the dipole was oriented parallel to the body axis (the long side of the phantom). The standard measuring distance was 15 mm (below 1 GHz) and 10 mm (above 1 GHz) from dipole center to the simulating liquid surface. • The coarse grid with a grid spacing of 10mm was aligned with the dipole. • Special 5x5x7 fine cube was chosen for cube integration (dx=dy= 7.5 mm, dz= 3 mm). • Distance between probe sensors and phantom surface was set to 3.0 mm. • The dipole input power (forward power) was 250 mW±3%. • The results are normalized to 1 W input power. Reference SAR values The reference SAR values were using measurement results indicated in the dipole calibration document (see table below) Frequency Local SAR at Surface Local SAR at Surface 1g SAR 10g SAR (MHz) (Above Feed Point) (y = 2cm offset from feed point) 900 10.3 6.57 16.4 5.4 1800 38.2 20.3 69.5 6.8 2450(Body) 53.6 25.0 107.2 N/A SYSTEM PERFORMANCE CHECK RESULTS Dipole: D2450V2 SN: 728 Date: Jul 5 , 2005 Ambient condition: Temperature 24.8°C; Relative humidity: 57% B od y S im u latin g Liq u id P aram eters T a rget M easu red D eviation [% ] L im ited [% ] f(M H z) T em p . [°C ] D ep th [cm ] P erm itivity: 5 2 .7 0 5 1 .1 0 -3 .0 4 ± 5 2 4 5 0 .0 0 2 3 .7 0 1 5 .0 0 C on d u c tivity: 1 .9 5 1 .9 1 -2 .0 5 ± 5 1g SAR : 5 3 .6 0 5 3 .2 0 -0 .7 5 ± 5 Page 15 Rev. 00

Compliance Certification Services Inc. Report No: 50630102-SF Date of Issue: Jul 5, 2005 8.2 TEST LIQUID CONFIRMATION SIMULATING LIQUIDS PARAMETER CHECK The simulating liquids should be checked at the beginning of a series of SAR measurements to determine of the dielectric parameters are within the tolerances of the specified target values The relative permittivity and conductivity of the tissue material should be within ± 5% of the values given in the table below. 5% may not be easily achieved at certain frequencies. Under such circumstances, 10% tolerance may be used until more precise tissue recipes are available IEEE SCC-34/SC-2 P1528 RECOMMENDED TISSUE DIELECTRIC PARAMETERS The head tissue dielectric parameters recommended by the IEEE SCC-34/SC-2 in P1528 have been incorporated in the following table. These head parameters are derived from planar layer models simulating the highest expected SAR for the dielectric properties and tissue thickness variations in a human head. Other head and body tissue parameters that have not been specified in P1528 are derived from the tissue dielectric parameters computed from the 4-Cole-Cole equations and extrapolated according to the head parameters specified in P1528 Target Frequency Head Body (MHz) εr σ (S/m) εr σ (S/m) 150 52.3 0.76 61.9 0.80 300 45.3 0.87 58.2 0.92 450 43.5 0.87 56.7 0.94 835 41.5 0.90 55.2 0.97 900 41.5 0.97 55.0 1.05 915 41.5 0.98 55.0 1.06 1450 40.5 1.20 54.0 1.30 1610 40.3 1.29 53.8 1.40 1800-2000 40.0 1.40 53.3 1.52 2450 39.2 1.80 52.7 1.95 3000 38.5 2.40 52.0 2.73 5800 45.3 5.27 48.2 6.00 SIMULATING LIQUIDS PARAMETER CHECK RESULTS Date: Jul 5 , 2005 Ambient condition: Temperature 24.8°C; Relative humidity: 57% Body Simulating Liquid Parameters Target Measured Deviation[%] Limited[%] f (MHz) Temp. [°C] Depth (cm) Permitivity: 52.70 51.10 -3.04 ±5 2450.00 23.70 15.00 Conductivity: 1.95 1.91 -2.05 ±5 Page 16 Rev. 00

Compliance Certification Services Inc. Report No: 50630102-SF Date of Issue: Jul 5, 2005 8.3 EUT TUNE-UP PROCEDURES The following procedure had been used to prepare the EUT for the SAR test. o The client supplied a special driver to program the EUT, allowing it to continually transmit the specified maximum power and change the channel frequency. o The conducted power was measured at the high, middle and low channel frequency before and after the SAR measurement. o The output power(dBm) we measured before SAR test in different transition rate and channel PK AV 2412 15.16 12.49 2437 15.31 12.77 2462 15.20 12.58 Page 17 Rev. 00

Compliance Certification Services Inc. Report No: 50630102-SF Date of Issue: Jul 5, 2005 8.4 SAR MEASUREMENTS RESULTS EUT Setup Configuration 1 802.11b (DSSS): Duty Cycle =100 %, Rate=1M, Crest Factor: 1 Depth of liquid: 15.0 cm *Conducted Liquid Frequency SAR Limit Sep. [mm] Antenna Channel Power dBm Temp [MHz] (W/kg) (W/kg) Before After [°C] 0 Main 6 2437 15.31 15.30 23.7 0.329 1.6 Notes: 1. *: Peak power. 2. Front panel in parallel with flat phantom. 3. See attachment for the result presentation in plot format. Page 18 Rev. 00

Compliance Certification Services Inc. Report No: 50630102-SF Date of Issue: Jul 5, 2005 EUT Setup Configuration 2 802.11b (DSSS): Duty Cycle =100 %, Rate=1M, Crest Factor: 1 Depth of liquid: 15.0 cm *Conducted Liquid Frequency SAR Limit Sep. [mm] Antenna Channel Power dBm Temp [MHz] (W/kg) (W/kg) Before After [°C] 0 main 6 2437 15.31 15.30 23.7 0.536 1.6 Notes: 1. *: Peak power. 2. Panel Bottom in parallel with flat phantom. 3. See attachment for the result presentation in plot format. Page 19 Rev. 00

Compliance Certification Services Inc. Report No: 50630102-SF Date of Issue: Jul 5, 2005 10.EQUIPMENT LIST & CALIBRATION STATUS Calibration Calibration Name of Equipment Manufacturer Type/Model Serial Number Cycle(days) Due S-Parameter Network Analyzer Agilent E8358A US40260243 365 05/24/05 Electronic Probe kit Hewlett Packard 85070D N/A N/A N/A Power Meter Boonton 4531 13061 365 07/12/05 Power Sensor Boonton 56218 2240 365 07/12/05 Thermometer Amarell 4046 25060 3650 10/02/14 Thermometer Amarell 4046 25058 3650 10/02/14 Wireless Communication Test Set Agilent E5515C GB44051665 365 07/23/05 Universal Radio Communication Tester Rohde & Schwarz CMU 200 1100.0008.02 N/A N/A Signal Generator Agilent 83630B 3844A01022 365 01/14/05 Signal Generator Agilent E8257C US42340383 365 08/01/05 Amplifier Mini-Circuit ZVE-8G N/A N/A N/A Amplifier Mini-Circuit ZHL-1724HLN N/A N/A N/A DC Power generator ABM 8301HD N/A N/A N/A Data Acquisition Electronics (DAE) SPEAG DAE3 427 365 03/15/05 Data Acquisition Electronics (DAE) SPEAG DAE3 558 365 08/24/05 Dosimetric E-Field Probe SPEAG ET3DV6 1763 365 03/23/05 Dosimetric E-Field Probe SPEAG EX3DV4 3554 365 11/19/05 835 MHz System Validation Dipole SPEAG D835V2 4d015 730 12/09/06 900 MHz System Validation Dipole SPEAG D900V2 179 730 05/12/06 1800 MHz System Validation Dipole SPEAG D1800V2 2d062 730 03/17/06 1900 MHz System Validation Dipole SPEAG D1900V2 5d056 730 12/09/06 2450 MHz System Validation Dipole SPEAG D2450V2 728 730 03/22/06 5G MHz System Validation Dipole SPEAG D5GHz 1004 730 10/04/05 Probe Alignment Unit SPEAG LB (V2) 348 N/A N/A Robot Staubli RX90B L F02/5T69A1/A/01 N/A N/A SAM Twin Phantom V4.0 SPEAG N/A N/A N/A N/A Devices Holder SPEAG N/A N/A N/A N/A Head/ Muscle 835 MHz CCS H/M 835A N/A N/A N/A Head/ Muscle 900 MHz CCS H/M 900A N/A N/A N/A Head/ Muscle 1800 MHz CCS H/M 1800A N/A N/A N/A Head/ Muscle 1900 MHz CCS H/M 1900A N/A N/A N/A Head/ Muscle 2450 MHz CCS H/M 2450A N/A N/A N/A Head/ Muscle 5800 MHz CCS H/M 5800A N/A N/A N/A Page 22 Rev. 00

Compliance Certification Services Inc. Report No: 50630102-SF Date of Issue: Jul 5, 2005 11.FACILITIES All measurement facilities used to collect the measurement data are located at No. 81-1, Lane 210, Bade Rd. 2, Luchu Hsiang, Taoyuan Hsien, Taiwan, R.O.C. No. 11, Wu-Kung 6 Rd, Wu-Ku Hsiang, Wu-Ku Industrial District, Taipei Hsien, (248) Taiwan. No. 199, Chunghsen Road, Hsintien City, Taipei Hsien, Taiwan, R.O.C. 12.REFERENCES [1] Federal Communications Commission, \Report and order: Guidelines for evaluating the environ-mental effects of radiofrequency radiation", Tech. Rep. FCC 96-326, FCC, Washington, D.C. 20554, 1996. [2] David L. Means Kwok Chan, Robert F. Cleveland, \Evaluating compliance with FCC guidelines for human exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields", Tech. Rep., Federal Communication Commision, O_ce of Engineering & Technology, Washington, DC, 1997. [3] Thomas Schmid, Oliver Egger, and Niels Kuster, \Automated E-_eld scanning system for dosimetric assessments", IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 44, pp. 105{113, Jan. 1996. [4] Niels Kuster, Ralph K.astle, and Thomas Schmid, \Dosimetric evaluation of mobile communications equipment with known precision", IEICE Transactions on Communications, vol. E80-B, no. 5, pp. 645{652, May 1997. [5] CENELEC, \Considerations for evaluating of human exposure to electromagnetic fields (EMFs) from mobile telecommunication equipment (MTE) in the frequency range 30MHz - 6GHz", Tech. Rep., CENELEC, European Committee for Electrotechnical Standardization, Brussels, 1997. [6] ANSI, ANSI/IEEE C95.1-1992: IEEE Standard for Safety Levels with Respect to Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields, 3 kHz to 300 GHz, The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc., New York, NY 10017, 1992. [7] Katja Pokovic, Thomas Schmid, and Niels Kuster, \Robust setup for precise calibration of E-_eld probes in tissue simulating liquids at mobile communications frequencies", in ICECOM _ 97, Dubrovnik, October 15{17, 1997, pp. 120{124. [8] Katja Pokovic, Thomas Schmid, and Niels Kuster, \E-_eld probe with improved isotropy in brain simulating liquids", in Proceedings of the ELMAR, Zadar, Croatia, 23{25 June, 1996, pp. 172{175. [9] Volker Hombach, Klaus Meier, Michael Burkhardt, Eberhard K. uhn, and Niels Kuster, \The dependence of EM energy absorption upon human head modeling at 900 MHz", IEEE Transactions onMicrowave Theory and Techniques, vol. 44, no. 10, pp. 1865{1873, Oct. 1996. [10] Klaus Meier, Ralf Kastle, Volker Hombach, Roger Tay, and Niels Kuster, \The dependence of EM energy absorption upon human head modeling at 1800 MHz", IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, Oct. 1997, in press. [11] W. Gander, Computermathematik, Birkhaeuser, Basel, 1992. [12] W. H. Press, S. A. Teukolsky,W. T. Vetterling, and B. P. Flannery, Numerical Recepies in C, The Art of Scientific Computing, Second Edition, Cambridge University Press, 1992..Dosimetric Evaluation of Sample device, month 1998 9 [13] NIS81 NAMAS, \The treatment of uncertainity in EMC measurement", Tech. Rep., NAMAS Executive, National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, Middlesex, England, 1994. [14] Barry N. Taylor and Christ E. Kuyatt, \Guidelines for evaluating and expressing the uncertainty of NIST measurement results", Tech. Rep., National Institute of Standards and Technology, 1994. Dosimetric Evaluation of Sample device, month 1998 10 Page 23 Rev. 00

Compliance Certification Services Inc. Report No: 50630102-SF Date of Issue: Jul 5, 2005 13.ATTACHMENTS Exhibit Content 1 System Performance Check Plots 2 SAR Test Plots END OF REPORT Page 24 Rev. 00


Document Created: 2005-09-07 11:04:50
Document Modified: 2005-09-07 11:04:50
© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC