Test report new additional positions

FCC ID: N7NAC750

RF Exposure Info

Download: PDF
FCCID_239709

in accordance with the requirements of FCC Report and Order: ET Docket 93-62, and OET Bulletin 65 Supplement C for SIERRA WIRELESS TRI-BAND GSM/GPRS PC CARD (This report covers only GPRS mode SAR) MODEL: AirCard 750 FCC ID: N7NAC750 APRIL 25, 2002 REPORT NO: 02U1267-1 Prepared for SIERRA WIRELESS INC 13811 WIRELESS WAY RICHMOND BC CANADA, V5L 2N3 Prepared by COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION SERVICES 561F MONTEREY ROAD, MORGAN HILL, CA 95037, USA TEL: (408) 463-0885

REPORT NO: 02U1267-1 DATE: April 25, 2002 FCC ID: N7NAC750 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE (SAR EVALUATION) Dates of Tests: April 25, 2002 Report No: 02U1267-1 APPLICANT: SIERRA WIRELESS INC 13811 WIRELESS WAY, RICHMOND BRITISH COLUMBIA V5L 2N3, CANADA TRADE NAME: Sierra Wireless AirCard 750 MODEL: AirCard 750 FCC ID: N7NAC750 DEVICE CATEGORY: MOBILE DEVICES EXPOSURE CATEGORY: GENERAL POPULATION/UNCONTROLLED EXPOSURE Test Sample is a: Production unit Operating Mode: Maximum continuous output Tx Frequency: 1850 – 1910 MHz Rx Frequency: 1930 – 1990 MHz Max. Output Power (Conducted): 25.1 dBm (1850.2 MHz) Max. SAR (1g): 0.609 mW/g (1850.2 MHz) Application Type: Certification FCC Rule Part(s): § Part 24 (E) This wireless mobile device has been shown to be capable of compliance for localized specific absorption rate (SAR) for uncontrolled environment/general population exposure limits specified in ANSI/IEEE Std. C95.1-1992 and had been tested in accordance with the measurement procedures specified in FCC OET 65 Supplement C (released on 6/29/2001 see Test Report). I attest to the accuracy of data. All measurements reported herein were performed by me or were made under my supervision and are correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I assume full responsibility for the completeness of these measurements and vouch for the qualifications of all persons taking them. Steve Cheng EMC Engineering Manager COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION SERVICES Page: 2 of 19 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of CCS. This document may be altered or revised by Compliance Certification Services personnel only, and shall be noted in the revision section of the document.

REPORT NO: 02U1267-1 DATE: April 25, 2002 FCC ID: N7NAC750 TABLE OF CONTENT 1. EUT DESCRIPTION..............................................................................................4 2. REQUIREMENTS FOR COMPLIANCE TESTING DEFINED BY THE FCC ...............5 3. DOSIMETRIC ASSESSMENT SETUP ....................................................................5 3.1. MEASUREMENT SYSTEM DIAGRAM .............................................................................................................6 3.2. SYSTEM COMPONENTS ..................................................................................................................................7 3.3. EUT ARRANGEMENT ......................................................................................................................................11 3.4. MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY...................................................................................................................12 4. EUT TUNE-UP PROCEDURE..............................................................................12 5. EVALUATION PROCEDURE ..............................................................................13 5.1. SYSTEM ACCURACY VERIFICATION...........................................................................................................13 5.2. SAR EVALUATION PROCEDURE ..................................................................................................................14 5.3. EXPOSURE LIMIT ............................................................................................................................................14 6. MEASUREMENT RESULTS................................................................................15 7. EUT PHOTO ......................................................................................................16 8. EQUIPMENTS LIST & CALIBRATION STATUS ...................................................17 9. REFERENCES ...................................................................................................18 10. ATTACHMENT ...................................................................................................19 COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION SERVICES Page: 3 of 19 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of CCS. This document may be altered or revised by Compliance Certification Services personnel only, and shall be noted in the revision section of the document.

REPORT NO: 02U1267-1 DATE: April 25, 2002 FCC ID: N7NAC750 1. EUT DESCRIPTION APPLICANT: SIERRA WIRELESS INC 13811 WIRELESS WAY, RICHMOND BRITISH COLUMBIA V5L 2N3, CANADA TRADE NAME: Sierra Wireless AirCard 750 MODEL: AirCard 750 FCC ID: N7NAC750 DEVICE CATEGORY: MOBILE DEVICES EXPOSURE CATEGORY: GENERAL POPULATION/UNCONTROLLED EXPOSURE Test Sample is a: Production unit Operating Mode: Maximum continuous output Tx Frequency: 1850 – 1910 MHz Rx Frequency: 1930 – 1990 MHz Max. Output Power (Conducted): 25.1 dBm (1850.2 MHz) Max. SAR (1g): 0.609 mW/g (1850.2 MHz) Application Type: Certification FCC Rule Part(s): § Part 24 (E) Antenna Type: Whip Antenna Dimensions: Approx.: Length = 75 mm; Diameter = 1.5 mm Battery option: N/A 1 Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) is a measure of the rate of energy absorption due to exposure to an RF transmitting source (wireless portable device). 2 IEEE/ANSI Std. C95.1-1992 limits are used to determine compliance with FCC ET Docket 93-62. COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION SERVICES Page: 4 of 19 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of CCS. This document may be altered or revised by Compliance Certification Services personnel only, and shall be noted in the revision section of the document.

REPORT NO: 02U1267-1 DATE: April 25, 2002 FCC ID: N7NAC750 2. REQUIREMENTS FOR COMPLIANCE TESTING DEFINED BY THE FCC The US Federal Communications Commission has released the report and order “Guidelines for Evaluating the Environmental Effects of RF Radiation", ET Docket No. 93-62 in August 1996 [1]. The order requires routine SAR evaluation prior to equipment authorization of portable transmitter devices, including portable telephones. For consumer products, the applicable limit is 1.6 mW/g for an uncontrolled environment and 8.0 mW/g for an occupational/controlled environment as recommended by the ANSI/IEEE standard C95.1-1992 [6]. According to the Supplement C of OET Bulletin 65 “Evaluating Compliance with FCC Guide-lines for Human Exposure to Radio frequency Electromagnetic Fields", released on Jun 29, 2001 by the FCC, the device should be evaluated at maximum output power (radiated from the antenna) under “worst-case” conditions for normal or intended use, incorporating normal antenna operating positions, device peak performance frequencies and positions for maximum RF energy coupling. 3. DOSIMETRIC ASSESSMENT SETUP These measurements were performed with the automated near-field scanning system DASY3 from Schmid & Partner Engineering AG (SPEAG). The system is based on a high precision robot (working range greater than 0.9 m) which positions the probes with a positional repeatability of better than ± 0.02 mm. Special E- and H-field probes have been developed for measurements close to material discontinuity, the sensors of which are directly loaded with a Schottky diode and connected via highly resistive lines to the data acquisition unit. The SAR measurements were conducted with the dosimetric probe ET3DV6 SN: 1577 (manufactured by SPEAG), designed in the classical triangular configuration [3] and optimized for dosimetric evaluation. The probe has been calibrated according to the procedure described in [7] with accuracy of better than ±10%. The spherical isotropy was evaluated with the procedure described in [8] and found to be better than ±0.25 dB. The phantom used was the SAM Twin Phantom as described in FCC supplement C, IEEE P1528 and EN50361. The Tissue simulation liquid used for each test is in according with the FCC OET65 supplement C as listed below. Ingredients Frequency (MHz) (% by weight) 450 835 915 1900 2450 Tissue Type Head Body Head Body Head Body Head Body Head Body Water 38.56 51.16 41.45 52.4 41.05 56.0 54.9 40.4 62.7 73.2 Salt (NaCl) 3.95 1.49 1.45 1.4 1.35 0.76 0.18 0.5 0.5 0.04 Sugar 56.32 46.78 56.0 45.0 56.5 41.76 0.0 58.0 0.0 0.0 HEC 0.98 0.52 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.21 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 Bactericide 0.19 0.05 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.27 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 Triton X-100 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 36.8 0.0 DGBE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 44.92 0.0 0.0 26.7 Dielectric Constant 43.42 58.0 42.54 56.1 42.0 56.8 39.9 54.0 39.8 52.5 Conductivity (S/m) 0.85 0.83 0.91 0.95 1.0 1.07 1.42 1.45 1.88 1.78 COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION SERVICES Page: 5 of 19 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of CCS. This document may be altered or revised by Compliance Certification Services personnel only, and shall be noted in the revision section of the document.

REPORT NO: 02U1267-1 DATE: April 25, 2002 FCC ID: N7NAC750 3.1. MEASUREMENT SYSTEM DIAGRAM Electro-optical coupler PC Opt link DAE Opt link Field probe (with surface detect) DSP Warning Remote Teach Lamp Control Panel Phantoms Serial Tissue simulating liquid Device under test Device holder Controller Box Robot Controller Option The DASY3 system for performing compliance tests consist of the following items: 1. A standard high precision 6-axis robot (Stäubli RX family) with controller and software. 2. An arm extension for accommodating the data acquisition electronics (DAE). 3. A dosimetric probe, i.e., an isotropic E-field probe optimized and calibrated for usage in tissue simulating liquid. The probe is equipped with an optical surface detector system. 4. A data acquisition electronic (DAE), which performs the signal amplification, signal multiplexing, AD-conversion, offset measurements, mechanical surface detection, collision detection, etc. The unit is battery powered with standard or rechargeable batteries. The signal is optically transmitted to the EOC. 5. A unit to operate the optical surface detector, which is connected to the EOC. 6. The Electro-optical coupler (EOC) performs the conversion from the optical into a digital electric signal of the DAE. The EOC is connected to the PC plug-in card. 7. The functions of the PC plug-in card based on a DSP is to perform the time critical task such as signal filtering, surveillance of the robot operation fast movement interrupts. 8. A computer operating Windows 95 or larger 9. DASY3 software 10. Remote control with teaches pendant and additional circuitry for robot safety such as warning lamps, etc. 11. The generic twin phantom enabling testing left-hand and right-hand usage. 12. The device holder for handheld EUT. 13. Tissue simulating liquid mixed according to the given recipes (see Application Note). 14. System validation dipoles to validate the proper functioning of the system. COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION SERVICES Page: 6 of 19 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of CCS. This document may be altered or revised by Compliance Certification Services personnel only, and shall be noted in the revision section of the document.

REPORT NO: 02U1267-1 DATE: April 25, 2002 FCC ID: N7NAC750 3.2. SYSTEM COMPONENTS ET3DV5 Probe Specification Construction Symmetrical design with triangular core Built-in optical fiber for surface detection System Built-in shielding against static charges Calibration In air from 10 MHz to 2.5 GHz In brain and muscle simulating tissue at Frequencies of 450 MHz, 900 MHz and 1.8 GHz (accuracy ± 8%) Frequency 10 MHz to > 6 GHz; Linearity: ± 0.2 dB (30 MHz to 3 GHz) Directivity ± 0.2 dB in brain tissue (rotation around probe axis) ± 0.4 dB in brain tissue (rotation normal probe axis) Dynamic 5 mW/g to > 100 mW/g; Range Linearity: ± 0.2 dB Surface ± 0.2 mm repeatability in air and clear liquids Detection over diffuse reflecting surfaces. Dimensions Overall length: 330 mm Photograph of the probe Tip length: 16 mm Body diameter: 12 mm Tip diameter: 6.8 mm Distance from probe tip to dipole centers: 2.7 mm Application General dosimetric up to 3 GHz Compliance tests of mobile phones Fast automatic scanning in arbitrary phantoms The SAR measurements were conducted with the dosimetric probe ET3DV6 designed in the classical triangular configuration and optimized for dosimetric evaluation. The probe is constructed using the thick film technique; with printed resistive lines on ceramic substrates. The probe is equipped with an optical multi-fiber line ending at the front of the probe tip. It is connected to the EOC box on the robot arm and provides an automatic detection of the phantom surface. Half of the fibers are connected to a pulsed infrared transmitter, the other half to a synchronized receiver. As the probe approaches the surface, the reflection from the surface produces a coupling from the transmitting to the receiving fibers. This reflection increases first during the approach, reaches maximum and then decreases. If the probe is flatly touching the surface, the coupling is zero. The distance of the coupling maximum to the surface is independent of the surface reflectivity and largely independent of the surface to probe angle. The DASY3 software reads the reflection during a software approach and looks for the maximum using a 2 nd order fitting. The approach is stopped when reaching the maximum. Inside view of ET3DV6 E-field Probe COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION SERVICES Page: 7 of 19 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of CCS. This document may be altered or revised by Compliance Certification Services personnel only, and shall be noted in the revision section of the document.

REPORT NO: 02U1267-1 DATE: April 25, 2002 FCC ID: N7NAC750 E-Field Probe Calibration Process Each probe is calibrated according to a dosimetric assessment procedure described in [6] with accuracy better than +/- 10%. The spherical isotropy was evaluated with the procedure described in [7] and found to be better than +/-0.25dB. The sensitivity parameters (NormX, NormY, NormZ), the diode compression parameter (DCP) and the conversion factor (ConvF) of the probe are tested. The free space E-field from amplified probe outputs is determined in a test chamber. This is performed in a TEM cell for frequencies bellow 1 GHz, and in a waveguide above 1 GHz for free space. For the free space calibration, the probe is placed in the volumetric center of the cavity and at the proper orientation with the field. The probe is then rotated 360 degrees. E-field temperature correlation calibration is performed in a flat phantom filled with the appropriate simulated brain tissue. The measured free space E-field in the medium correlates to temperature rise in dielectric medium. For temperature correlation calibration a RF transparent thermistor-based temperature probe is used in conjunction with the E-field probe. Data Evaluation The DASY3 software automatically executes the following procedures to calculate the field units from the microvolt readings at the probe connector. The parameters used in the evaluation are stored in the configuration modules of the software: Probe parameters: - Sensitivity Normi, ai10, ai11, ai12 - Conversion factor ConvFi - Diode compression point Dcpi Device parameters: - Frequency f - Crest factor cf Media parameters: - Conductivity σ - Density r These parameters must be set correctly in the software. They can either be found in the component documents or be imported into the software from the configuration files issued for the DASY3 components. In the direct measuring mode of the multi-meter option, the parameters of the actual system setup are used. In the scan visualization and export modes, the parameters stored in the corresponding document files are used. The first step of the evaluation is a linearization of the filtered input signal to account for the compression characteristics of the detector diode. The compensation depends on the input signal, the diode type and the DC-transmission factor from the diode to the evaluation electronics. If the exciting field is pulsed, the crest factor of the signal must be known to correctly compensate for peak power. The formula for each channel can be given as: 2 cf V = U +U i i i ⋅ dcpi with Vi = Compensated signal of channel i (i = x, y, z) Ui = Input signal of channel i (i = x, y, z) cf = Crest factor of exciting field (DASY parameter) dcpi = Diode compression point (DASY parameter) COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION SERVICES Page: 8 of 19 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of CCS. This document may be altered or revised by Compliance Certification Services personnel only, and shall be noted in the revision section of the document.

REPORT NO: 02U1267-1 DATE: April 25, 2002 FCC ID: N7NAC750 From the compensated input signals the primary field data for each channel can be evaluated: E-field probes: V = i E i Norm ⋅ ConvF i 2 H-field probes: a +a f +a f i10 i11 i12 H i = Vi ⋅ f with Vi = Compensated signal of channel i (i = x, y, z) Normi = Sensor sensitivity of channel i (i = x, y, z) 2 µV/(V/m) for E0field Probes ConvF = Sensitivity enhancement in solution aij = Sensor sensitivity factors for H-field probes f = Carrier frequency (GHz) Ei = Electric field strength of channel i in V/m Hi = Magnetic field strength of channel i in A/m The RSS value of the field components gives the total field strength (Hermitian magnitude): 2 2 2 E tot = E +E +E x y z The primary field data are used to calculate the derived field units. 2 s SAR = E ⋅ r tot ⋅ 1000 with SAR = local specific absorption rate in mW/g Etot = total field strength in V/m σ = conductivity in [mho/m] or [siemens/m] r = equivalent tissue density in g/cm3 Note that the density is normally set to 1 (or 1.06), to account for actual brain density rather than the density of the simulation liquid. The power flow density is calculated assuming the excitation field as a free space field. 2 = E tot or P = 2 H ⋅ 37.7 P pwe 3770 pwe tot with Ppwe = Equivalent power density of a plane wave in mW/cm2 Etot = total electric field strength in V/m Htot = total magnetic field strength in A/m COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION SERVICES Page: 9 of 19 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of CCS. This document may be altered or revised by Compliance Certification Services personnel only, and shall be noted in the revision section of the document.

REPORT NO: 02U1267-1 DATE: April 25, 2002 FCC ID: N7NAC750 SAM Phantom The SAM Phantom V4.0 is constructed of a fiberglass shell integrated in a wooden table. The shape of the shell is in compliance with the specification set in IEEE P1528 and CENELEC EN50361. The phantom enables the dosimetric evaluation of left and right hand phone usage as well as body mounted usage at the flat phantom region. A cover prevents the evaporation of the liquid. Reference markings on the Phantom allow the complete setup of all predefined phantom positions and measurement grids by manually teaching three points in the robot. Shell Thickness: 2 ± 0.2 mm Filling Volume: Approx. 25 liters Dimensions (H x L x W): 810 x 1000 x 500 mm SAM Phantom Device Holder for Transmitters In combination with the Generic Twin Phantom V3.0, the Mounting Device enables the rotation of the mounted transmitter in spherical coordinates whereby the rotation points is the ear opening. The devices can be easily, accurately, and repeatedly positioned according to the FCC and CENELEC specifications. The device holder can be locked at different phantom locations (left head, right head, flat phantom). * Note: A simulating human hand is not used due to the complex anatomical and geometrical structure of the hand that may produced infinite number of configurations [10]. To produce the worst-case condition (the hand absorbs antenna Device Holder output power), the hand is omitted during the tests. COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION SERVICES Page: 10 of 19 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of CCS. This document may be altered or revised by Compliance Certification Services personnel only, and shall be noted in the revision section of the document.

REPORT NO: 02U1267-1 DATE: April 25, 2002 FCC ID: N7NAC750 3.3. EUT ARRANGEMENT Two specific EUT setups were used to evaluate the SAR 1. PC back surface touch the flat phantom as in normal operation condition. The antenna end section was bend 90° to parallel the phantom surface and the separation distance to the phantom surface is 16 mm. 2. The antenna is configured in normal operation condition, i.e. antenna seat straight up toward the keyboard, and the SAR measurement was taken from the left side of the PC as indicated on the setup photo. The antenna separation distance to the phantom surface is 25 mm. SETUP PHOTO: EUT Set-up configuration 1 16 mm 45 mm EUT Set-up configuration 2 25 mm COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION SERVICES Page: 11 of 19 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of CCS. This document may be altered or revised by Compliance Certification Services personnel only, and shall be noted in the revision section of the document.

REPORT NO: 02U1267-1 DATE: April 25, 2002 FCC ID: N7NAC750 3.4. MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY The uncertainty budget has been determined for the DASY3 measurement system according to the NIS81 [13] and the NIST1297 [14] documents and is given in the following Table. Uncertainty Description Error Distrib. Weight Std. Dev. Offset Probe Uncertainty Axial isotropy ± 0.2 dB U-shape 0.5 ±2.4 % Spherical isotropy ±0.4 dB U-shape 0.5 ±4.8 % Isotropy from gradient ±0.5 dB U-shape 0 Spatial resolution ±0.5 % Normal 1 ±0.5 % Linearity error ±0.2 dB Rectangle 1 ±2.7 % Calibration error ±3.3 % Normal 1 ± 3.3 % SAR Evaluation Uncertainty Data acquisition error ±1% Rectangle 1 ±0.6 % ELF and RF disturbances ±0.25 % Normal 1 ±0.25 % Conductivity assessment ±10 % Rectangle 1 ± 5.8 % Spatial Peak SAR Evaluation Uncertainty Extrapol boundary effect ±3% Normal 1 ±3% ± 5% Probe positioning error ±0.1 mm Normal 1 ± 1% Integrat. and cube orient ±3% Normal 1 ±3% Cube shape inaccuracies ±2% Rectangle 1 ±1.2 % Device positioning ±6% Normal 1 ± 6% Combined Uncertainties 1 ±11.7 % ± 5% Expanded uncertainty (K = 2) ± 23.5 %. 4. EUT TUNE-UP PROCEDURE 1. EUT preparation To stabilize the power drift, the EUT was allowed to warm up for 40 minutes in the laptop. Then the output power was increased to the specified maximum limit using AT commands supplied by the manufacturer. The output power was monitored and fine-tuned for another 10 minutes to ensure EUT power drift was stabilized. 2. EUT operation conditions The AirCard 750 was commanded to transmit continuous pseudo random data on 4 timeslots (Multi-slot Class 12 GPRS device) at the maximum power level of PCL=0. This was accomplished through an AT command interface (Procomm Plus). The frequency of transmission (low, middle and high channel) was varied using AT commands as well. Continuous transmission was chosen over a signaling mode since no signaling test equipment is available for multi-slot operation. Maximum average conducted power was measured by replacing the antenna with an adapter for conductive measurements, before and after the SAR measurements was done. COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION SERVICES Page: 12 of 19 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of CCS. This document may be altered or revised by Compliance Certification Services personnel only, and shall be noted in the revision section of the document.

REPORT NO: 02U1267-1 DATE: April 25, 2002 FCC ID: N7NAC750 5. EVALUATION PROCEDURE Simulated Tissue Liquid Parameter confirmation The dielectric parameters were checked prior to assessment using the HP85070A dielectric probe kit. The dielectric parameters measured are reported in each correspondent section. IEEE SCC-34/SC-2 P1528 recommended Tissue Dielectric Parameters The head tissue dielectric parameters recommended by the IEEE SCC-34/SC-2 in P1528 have been incorporated in the following table. These head parameters are derived from planar layer models simulating the highest expected SAR for the dielectric properties and tissue thickness variations in a human head. Other head and body tissue parameters that have not been specified in P1528 are derived from the tissue dielectric parameters computed from the 4-Cole-Cole equations and extrapolated according to the head parameters specified in P1528. Target Frequency Head Body (MHz) εr σ (S/m) εr σ (S/m) 150 52.3 0.76 61.9 0.80 300 45.3 0.87 58.2 0.92 450 43.5 0.87 56.7 0.94 835 41.5 0.90 55.2 0.97 900 41.5 0.97 55.0 1.05 915 41.5 0.98 55.0 1.06 1450 40.5 1.20 54.0 1.30 1610 40.3 1.29 53.8 1.40 1800-2000 40.0 1.40 53.3 1.52 2450 39.2 1.80 52.7 1.95 3000 38.5 2.40 52.0 2.73 5800 45.3 5.27 48.2 6.00 (εr = relative permittivity, σ = conductivity and ρ = 1000 kg/m3) 5.1. SYSTEM ACCURACY VERIFICATION Prior to the assessment, the system validation kit was used to test whether the system was operating within its specifications of ±10%. The validation results are tabulated below. And also the corresponding SAR plot is attached as well in the SAR plots files. IEEE P1528 Recommended Reference Value Frequency Local SAR at surface Local SAR at surface 1 g SAR 10 g SAR (MHz) (Above feed point) (y=2cm offset from feed point) 900 10.8 6.9 16.4 5.4 1800 38.1 19.8 69.5 6.8 SYSTEM VALIDATION RESULT Ambient conditions - Ambient temperature: 23°C; Relative humidity: 57 % System Validation Dipole: D1800V2 SN: 294 Depth of liquid: 15.1 cm Liquid Measured Deviation Limit Liquid Temp Parameters Target Value Value [%] [%] [°C] εr 40 40.6 +1.5 ±5 Head 21 σ 1.4 1.44 +2.9 ±5 1800 MHz 21 1 g SAR 38.1 36.92 -3.1 ± 10 COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION SERVICES Page: 13 of 19 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of CCS. This document may be altered or revised by Compliance Certification Services personnel only, and shall be noted in the revision section of the document.

REPORT NO: 02U1267-1 DATE: April 25, 2002 FCC ID: N7NAC750 5.2. SAR EVALUATION PROCEDURE The evaluation was performed with the following procedure: Step 1: Measurement of the SAR value at a fixed location above the ear point or central position was used as a reference value for assessing the power drop. Step 2: The SAR distribution at the exposed side of the head was measured at a distance of 3.9 mm from the inner surface of the shell. The area covered the entire dimension of the head or EUT and the horizontal grid spacing was 20 mm x 20 mm. Based on these data, the area of the maximum absorption was determined by spline interpolation. Step 3: Around this point, a volume of 32 mm x 32 mm x 34 mm was assessed by measuring 5 x 5 x 7 points. On the basis of this data set, the spatial peak SAR value was evaluated under the following procedure: 1. The data at the surface were extrapolated, since the center of the dipoles is 2.7 mm away from the tip of the probe and the distance between the surface and the lowest measuring point is 1.2 mm. The extrapolation was based on a least square algorithm [11]. A polynomial of the fourth order was calculated through the points in z-axes. This polynomial was then used to evaluate the points between the surface and the probe tip. 2. The maximum interpolated value was searched with a straightforward algorithm. Around this maximum the SAR values averaged over the spatial volumes (1 g or 10 g) were computed by the 3D-Spline interpolation algorithm. The 3D-Spline is composed of three one-dimensional splines with the “Not a knot"-condition (in x, y and z-directions) [11], [12]. The volume was integrated with the trapezoidal-algorithm. One thousand points (10 x 10 x 10) were interpolated to calculate the average. 3. All neighboring volumes were evaluated until no neighboring volume with a higher average value was found. Step 4: Re-measurement of the SAR value at the same location as in Step 1. If the value changed by more than 5%, the evaluation was repeated. 5.3. EXPOSURE LIMIT (A) Limits for Occupational/Controlled Exposure (W/kg) Whole-Body Partial-Body Hands, Wrists, Feet and Ankles 0.4 8.0 20.0 (B) Limits for General Population/Uncontrolled Exposure (W/kg) Whole-Body Partial-Body Hands, Wrists, Feet and Ankles 0.08 1.6 4.0 NOTE 1: Whole-Body SAR is averaged over the entire body, partial-body SAR is averaged over any 1 gram of tissue defined as a tissue volume in the shape of a cube. SAR for hands, wrists, feet and ankles is averaged over any 10 grams of tissue defined as a tissue volume in the shape of a cube. Population/Uncontrolled Environments: are defined as locations where there is the exposure of individuals who have no knowledge or control of their exposure. Occupational/Controlled Environments: are defined as locations where there is exposure that may be incurred by people who are aware of the potential for exposure, (i.e. as a result of employment or occupation). NOTE GENERAL POPULATION/UNCONTROLLED EXPOSURE PARTIAL BODY LIMIT 1.6 mW/g COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION SERVICES Page: 14 of 19 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of CCS. This document may be altered or revised by Compliance Certification Services personnel only, and shall be noted in the revision section of the document.

REPORT NO: 02U1267-1 DATE: April 25, 2002 FCC ID: N7NAC750 6. MEASUREMENT RESULTS LIQUID VERIFY: Ambient conditions - Ambient temperature: 23°C; Relative humidity: 57 % Liquid Liquid Parameters Target Value Measured Deviation [%] Limit [%] Temp [°C] εr 53.3 53.3 0 ±5 Muscle 21 1900 MHz σ 1.52 1.55 +1.97 ±5 SAR MEASUREMENT: Model Name: AirCard 750 (Modulation: GPRS 50% duty cycle; Crest factor: 2) Phantom Section: Flat (Body) Depth of liquid: 15.1 cm EUT Set-up configuration 1 EUT Set-up conditions Conducted Power [dBm] Liquid SAR (W/kg) Temp Limit Frequency Antenna Sep. (1g) (1g) (W/kg) Channel Before After [°C] [MHz] position [mm] Measured Corrected* 512 1850.2 Vertical 0 25.1 24.9 21 0.257 N/A 1.6 661 1880.0 Vertical 0 24.8 24.7 21 0.191 N/A 1.6 810 1909.8 Vertical 0 24.8 24.7 21 0.133 N/A 1.6 EUT Set-up configuration 2 EUT Set-up conditions Conducted Power [dBm] Liquid SAR (W/kg) Limit Temp (1g) (W/kg) Frequency Antenna Sep. (1g) Channel Before After [°C] [MHz] position [mm] Measured Corrected* 512 1850.2 Vertical 25 25.1 24.9 20.5 0.609 N/A 1.6 661 1880.0 Vertical 25 24.8 24.7 21 0.393 N/A 1.6 810 1909.8 Vertical 25 24.8 24.7 21 0.338 N/A 1.6 Note (s): The data in this table is for GPRS mode only. It does not include GSM mode. COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION SERVICES Page: 15 of 19 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of CCS. This document may be altered or revised by Compliance Certification Services personnel only, and shall be noted in the revision section of the document.

REPORT NO: 02U1267-1 DATE: April 25, 2002 FCC ID: N7NAC750 7. EUT PHOTO COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION SERVICES Page: 16 of 19 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of CCS. This document may be altered or revised by Compliance Certification Services personnel only, and shall be noted in the revision section of the document.

REPORT NO: 02U1267-1 DATE: April 25, 2002 FCC ID: N7NAC750 8. EQUIPMENTS LIST & CALIBRATION STATUS Calibration Name of Equipment Manufacturer Type/Model Serial Number last cal. due date S-Parameter Network Analyzer Agilent 8753ES MY40001647 5/19/01 6/4/02 Electronic Probe kit Hewlett Packard 85070A N/A N/A N/A 3.5 mm Calibration Kit Agilent 85033D 3423A07200 6/4/01 6/4/02 Power Meter Rohde & Schwarz NRVD 842093/017 1/21/02 1/21/03 Power Sensor Rohde & Schwarz NRV-Z51 841275/013 1/21/02 1/21/03 Universal Radio Communication Rohde & Schwarz CMU 200 838114/032 11/20/01 11/20/02 Tester Amplifier Mini-Circuit ZHL-42W D072701-5 N/A N/A DC Power generator Kenwood PA36-3A 7060074 N/A N/A Data Acquisition Electronics (DAE) SPEAG DAE3 V1 500 2/26/02 2/26/03 Dosimetric E-Field Probe SPEAG ET3DV6 1578 2/22/01 2/22/03 900 MHz System Validation Dipole SPEAG D900V2 108 4/17/01 4/17/03 1800 MHz System Validation Dipole SPEAG D1800V2 294 4/19/01 4/19/03 450 MHz System Validation Dipole SPEAG D450V2 1003 4/5/02 4/19/04 Probe Alignment Unit SPEAG LB (V2) 261 N/A N/A Dummy Probe SPEAG DP1 N/A N/A N/A Robot Staubli RX90B L F00/5H31A1/A/01 N/A N/A Generic Twin Phantom SPEAG N/A N/A N/A N/A SAM Phantom SPEAG N/A N/A N/A N/A Devices Holder SPEAG N/A N/A N/A N/A Head 450 MHz CCS H450A N/A Daily N/A Muscle 450 MHz CCS M450A N/A Daily N/A Head 835 MHz CCS H835A N/A Daily N/A Muscle 835 MHz CCS M835A N/A Daily N/A Head 900 MHz CCS H900A N/A Daily N/A Muscle 900 MHz CCS M900A N/A Daily N/A Head 1800 MHz CCS H1800A N/A Daily N/A Muscle 1800 MHz CCS M1800A N/A Daily N/A Head 1900 MHz CCS H1900A N/A Daily N/A Muscle 1900 MHz CCS M1900A N/A Daily N/A Head 2450 MHz CCS H2450A N/A Daily N/A Muscle 2450 MHz CCS M2450A N/A Daily N/A COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION SERVICES Page: 17 of 19 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of CCS. This document may be altered or revised by Compliance Certification Services personnel only, and shall be noted in the revision section of the document.

REPORT NO: 02U1267-1 DATE: April 25, 2002 FCC ID: N7NAC750 9. REFERENCES [1] Federal Communications Commission, \Report and order: Guidelines for evaluating the environ- mental effects of radiofrequency radiation", Tech. Rep. FCC 96-326, FCC, Washington, D.C. 20554, 1996. [2] David L. Means Kwok Chan, Robert F. Cleveland, \Evaluating compliance with FCC guidelines for human exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields", Tech. Rep., Federal Communication Commision, O_ce of Engineering & Technology, Washington, DC, 1997. [3] Thomas Schmid, Oliver Egger, and Niels Kuster, \Automated E-_eld scanning system for dosimetric assessments", IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 44, pp. 105{113, Jan. 1996. [4] Niels Kuster, Ralph K.astle, and Thomas Schmid, \Dosimetric evaluation of mobile communications equipment with known precision", IEICE Transactions on Communications, vol. E80-B, no. 5, pp. 645{652, May 1997. [5] CENELEC, \Considerations for evaluating of human exposure to electromagnetic fields (EMFs) from mobile telecommunication equipment (MTE) in the frequency range 30MHz - 6GHz", Tech. Rep., CENELEC, European Committee for Electrotechnical Standardization, Brussels, 1997. [6] ANSI, ANSI/IEEE C95.1-1992: IEEE Standard for Safety Levels with Respect to Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields, 3 kHz to 300 GHz, The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc., New York, NY 10017, 1992. [7] Katja Pokovic, Thomas Schmid, and Niels Kuster, \Robust setup for precise calibration of E-_eld probes in tissue simulating liquids at mobile communications frequencies", in ICECOM _ 97, Dubrovnik, October 15{17, 1997, pp. 120{124. [8] Katja Pokovic, Thomas Schmid, and Niels Kuster, \E-_eld probe with improved isotropy in brain simulating liquids", in Proceedings of the ELMAR, Zadar, Croatia, 23{25 June, 1996, pp. 172{175. [9] Volker Hombach, Klaus Meier, Michael Burkhardt, Eberhard K. uhn, and Niels Kuster, \The dependence of EM energy absorption upon human head modeling at 900 MHz", IEEE Transactions onMicrowave Theory and Techniques, vol. 44, no. 10, pp. 1865{1873, Oct. 1996. [10] Klaus Meier, Ralf Kastle, Volker Hombach, Roger Tay, and Niels Kuster, \The dependence of EM energy absorption upon human head modeling at 1800 MHz", IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, Oct. 1997, in press. [11] W. Gander, Computermathematik, Birkhaeuser, Basel, 1992. [12] W. H. Press, S. A. Teukolsky,W. T. Vetterling, and B. P. Flannery, Numerical Recepies in C, The Art of Scientific Computing, Second Edition, Cambridge University Press, 1992..Dosimetric Evaluation of Sample device, month 1998 9 [13] NIS81 NAMAS, \The treatment of uncertainity in EMC measurement", Tech. Rep., NAMAS Executive, National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, Middlesex, England, 1994. [14] Barry N. Taylor and Christ E. Kuyatt, \Guidelines for evaluating and expressing the uncertainty of NIST measurement results", Tech. Rep., National Institute of Standards and Technology, 1994. Dosimetric Evaluation of Sample device, month 1998 10 COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION SERVICES Page: 18 of 19 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of CCS. This document may be altered or revised by Compliance Certification Services personnel only, and shall be noted in the revision section of the document.

REPORT NO: 02U1267-1 DATE: April 25, 2002 FCC ID: N7NAC750 10. ATTACHMENT Exhibit Content No. of page (s) 1 SAR System Validation Plots 2 2 SAR Test Plots 12 3 Dosimetric E-Field Probe (ET3DV6, S/N: 1578) 12 4 System Validation Dipole (D1800V2, S/N: 294) 7 End of Report COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION SERVICES Page: 19 of 19 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of CCS. This document may be altered or revised by Compliance Certification Services personnel only, and shall be noted in the revision section of the document.

04/25/02 System Validation - D1800V2 S/N: 294 (Iuput power: 250 mW) SAM; Flat Probe: ET3DV6 - SN1578; ConvF(5.50,5.50,5.50); Crest factor: 1.0 Head 1800 MHz: σ = 1.44 mho/m εr = 40.6 ρ = 1.00 g/cm3 Cube 5x5x7: Peak: 16.9 mW/g, SAR (1g): 9.23 mW/g, SAR (10g): 4.87 mW/g, (Worst-case extrapolation) Penetration depth: 8.5 (8.1, 9.4) [mm] Powerdrift: -0.12 dB Ambient Temperature (degree C): 23 Liquid Temperature (degree C): 21.0 SARTot [mW/g] 8.77E+0 6.82E+0 4.87E+0 2.92E+0 9.75E-1 COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION SERVICES

04/25/02 System Validation - D1800V2 S/N: 294 (Iuput power: 250 mW) SAM; Probe: ET3DV6 - SN1578; ConvF(5.50,5.50,5.50); Crest factor: 1.0 Head 1800 MHz: σ = 1.44 mho/m εr = 40.6 ρ = 1.00 g/cm3 : , , () Penetration depth: 8.4 (8.0, 9.4) [mm] Ambient Temperature (degree C): 23 Liquid Temperature (degree C): 21.0 18 16 14 12 SAR tot [mW/g] 10 8 6 4 2 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 [mm] COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION SERVICES

04/25/02 Sierra_AirCard 750; Flat section; Frequency: 1850.2 MHz) Frequency: 1900 MHz; Crest factor: 2.0 Medium: Muscle 1900 MHz: σ = 1.55 mho/m εr = 53.3 ρ = 1.00 g/cm3 SAM Phantom; Flat Section; Position: (90°,90°) Probe: ET3DV6 - SN1578; ConvF(5.10,5.10,5.10); SAR:Cube 5x5x7: Peak: 1.02 mW/g, SAR (1g): 0.609 mW/g, SAR (10g): 0.362 mW/g, (Worst-case extrapolation) Penetration depth: 10.9 (9.6, 12.7) [mm]; Powerdrift: 0.02 dB Coarse: Dx = 14.0, Dy = 14.0, Dz = 10.0 Ambient Temperature (degree C): 23 Liquid Temperature (degree C): 20.5 SARTot [mW/g] 5.20E-1 4.05E-1 2.89E-1 1.73E-1 5.78E-2 COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION SERVICES

04/25/02 Sierra_AirCard 750; Flat section; Frequency: 1850.2 MHz) Frequency: 1900 MHz; Crest factor: 2.0 Medium: Muscle 1900 MHz: σ = 1.55 mho/m εr = 53.3 ρ = 1.00 g/cm3 SAM Phantom; Section; Position: Probe: ET3DV6 - SN1578; ConvF(5.10,5.10,5.10); SAR:: , , () Penetration depth: 11.0 (9.8, 12.6) [mm]; Z-Axis: Dx = 0.0, Dy = 0.0, Dz = 2.0 Ambient Temperature (degree C): 23 Liquid Temperature (degree C): 20.5 1.1 1.0 0.9 0.8 SAR tot [mW/g] 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 [mm] COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION SERVICES

04/25/02 Sierra_AirCard 750; Flat section; Frequency: 1880.0 MHz) Frequency: 1900 MHz; Crest factor: 2.0 Medium: Muscle 1900 MHz: σ = 1.55 mho/m εr = 53.3 ρ = 1.00 g/cm3 SAM Phantom; Flat Section; Position: (90°,90°) Probe: ET3DV6 - SN1578; ConvF(5.10,5.10,5.10); SAR:Cube 5x5x7: Peak: 0.661 mW/g, SAR (1g): 0.393 mW/g, SAR (10g): 0.235 mW/g, (Worst-case extrapolation) Penetration depth: 10.6 (9.4, 12.1) [mm]; Powerdrift: -0.01 dB Coarse: Dx = 14.0, Dy = 14.0, Dz = 10.0 Ambient Temperature (degree C): 23 Liquid Temperature (degree C): 21 SARTot [mW/g] 3.65E-1 2.83E-1 2.03E-1 1.22E-1 4.05E-2 COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION SERVICES

04/25/02 Sierra_AirCard 750; Flat section; Frequency: 1880.0 MHz) Frequency: 1900 MHz; Crest factor: 2.0 Medium: Muscle 1900 MHz: σ = 1.55 mho/m εr = 53.3 ρ = 1.00 g/cm3 SAM Phantom; Section; Position: Probe: ET3DV6 - SN1578; ConvF(5.10,5.10,5.10); SAR:: , , () Penetration depth: 10.6 (9.5, 12.2) [mm]; Z-Axis: Dx = 0.0, Dy = 0.0, Dz = 2.0 Ambient Temperature (degree C): 23 Liquid Temperature (degree C): 21 0.7 0.6 0.5 SAR tot [mW/g] 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 [mm] COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION SERVICES

04/25/02 Sierra_AirCard 750; Flat section; Frequency: 1909.8MHz) Frequency: 1900 MHz; Crest factor: 2.0 Medium: Muscle 1900 MHz: σ = 1.55 mho/m εr = 53.3 ρ = 1.00 g/cm3 SAM Phantom; Flat Section; Position: (90°,90°) Probe: ET3DV6 - SN1578; ConvF(5.10,5.10,5.10); SAR:Cube 5x5x7: Peak: 0.572 mW/g, SAR (1g): 0.338 mW/g, SAR (10g): 0.201 mW/g, (Worst-case extrapolation) Penetration depth: 10.4 (9.3, 12.0) [mm]; Powerdrift: -0.01 dB Coarse: Dx = 14.0, Dy = 14.0, Dz = 10.0 Ambient Temperature (degree C): 23 Liquid Temperature (degree C): 21 SARTot [mW/g] 3.10E-1 2.41E-1 1.72E-1 1.03E-1 3.44E-2 COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION SERVICES

04/25/02 Sierra_AirCard 750; Flat section; Frequency: 1909.8MHz) Frequency: 1900 MHz; Crest factor: 2.0 Medium: Muscle 1900 MHz: σ = 1.55 mho/m εr = 53.3 ρ = 1.00 g/cm3 SAM Phantom; Section; Position: Probe: ET3DV6 - SN1578; ConvF(5.10,5.10,5.10); SAR:: , , () Penetration depth: 10.5 (9.3, 12.1) [mm]; Z-Axis: Dx = 0.0, Dy = 0.0, Dz = 2.0 Ambient Temperature (degree C): 23 Liquid Temperature (degree C): 21 0.6 0.5 0.4 SAR tot [mW/g] 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 [mm] COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION SERVICES

04/25/02 Sierra_AirCard 750; Flat section; Frequency: 1850.2MHz) Frequency: 1900 MHz; Crest factor: 2.0 Medium: Muscle 1900 MHz: σ = 1.55 mho/m εr = 53.3 ρ = 1.00 g/cm3 SAM Phantom; Flat Section; Position: (90°,270°) Probe: ET3DV6 - SN1578; ConvF(5.10,5.10,5.10); SAR:Cube 5x5x7: Peak: 0.418 mW/g, SAR (1g): 0.257 mW/g, SAR (10g): 0.165 mW/g, (Worst-case extrapolation) Penetration depth: 12.5 (10.3, 15.7) [mm]; Powerdrift: -0.13 dB Coarse: Dx = 14.0, Dy = 14.0, Dz = 10.0 Ambient Temperature (degree C): 23 Liquid Temperature (degree C): 21 SARTot [mW/g] 2.51E-1 1.95E-1 1.40E-1 8.37E-2 2.79E-2 COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION SERVICES

04/25/02 Sierra_AirCard 750; Flat section; Frequency: 1850.2MHz) Frequency: 1900 MHz; Crest factor: 2.0 Medium: Muscle 1900 MHz: σ = 1.55 mho/m εr = 53.3 ρ = 1.00 g/cm3 SAM Phantom; Section; Position: Probe: ET3DV6 - SN1578; ConvF(5.10,5.10,5.10); SAR:: , , () Penetration depth: 12.7 (10.4, 16.0) [mm]; Z-Axis: Dx = 0.0, Dy = 0.0, Dz = 2.0 Ambient Temperature (degree C): 23 Liquid Temperature (degree C): 21 0.5 0.4 SAR tot [mW/g] 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 [mm] COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION SERVICES

04/25/02 Sierra_AirCard 750; Flat section; Frequency: 1880.0 MHz) Frequency: 1900 MHz; Crest factor: 2.0 Medium: Muscle 1900 MHz: σ = 1.55 mho/m εr = 53.3 ρ = 1.00 g/cm3 SAM Phantom; Flat Section; Position: (90°,270°) Probe: ET3DV6 - SN1578; ConvF(5.10,5.10,5.10); SAR:Cube 5x5x7: Peak: 0.317 mW/g, SAR (1g): 0.191 mW/g, SAR (10g): 0.116 mW/g, (Worst-case extrapolation) Penetration depth: 10.4 (9.6, 11.7) [mm]; Powerdrift: 0.10 dB Coarse: Dx = 14.0, Dy = 14.0, Dz = 10.0 Ambient Temperature (degree C): 23 Liquid Temperature (degree C): 21 SARTot [mW/g] 1.85E-1 1.44E-1 1.03E-1 6.15E-2 2.05E-2 COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION SERVICES

04/25/02 Sierra_AirCard 750; Flat section; Frequency: 1880.0 MHz) Frequency: 1900 MHz; Crest factor: 2.0 Medium: Muscle 1900 MHz: σ = 1.55 mho/m εr = 53.3 ρ = 1.00 g/cm3 SAM Phantom; Section; Position: Probe: ET3DV6 - SN1578; ConvF(5.10,5.10,5.10); SAR:: , , () Penetration depth: 10.5 (9.3, 12.4) [mm]; Z-Axis: Dx = 0.0, Dy = 0.0, Dz = 2.0 Ambient Temperature (degree C): 23 Liquid Temperature (degree C): 21 0.4 0.3 SAR tot [mW/g] 0.2 0.1 0.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 [mm] COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION SERVICES

04/25/02 Sierra_AirCard 750; Flat section; Frequency: 1909.8MHz) Frequency: 1900 MHz; Crest factor: 2.0 Medium: Muscle 1900 MHz: σ = 1.55 mho/m εr = 53.3 ρ = 1.00 g/cm3 SAM Phantom; Flat Section; Position: (90°,270°) Probe: ET3DV6 - SN1578; ConvF(5.10,5.10,5.10); SAR:Cube 5x5x7: Peak: 0.229 mW/g, SAR (1g): 0.133 mW/g, SAR (10g): 0.0818 mW/g, (Worst-case extrapolation) Penetration depth: 10.7 (9.0, 13.2) [mm]; Powerdrift: -0.01 dB Coarse: Dx = 14.0, Dy = 14.0, Dz = 10.0 Ambient Temperature (degree C): 23 Liquid Temperature (degree C): 21 SARTot [mW/g] 1.25E-1 9.73E-2 6.95E-2 4.17E-2 1.39E-2 COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION SERVICES

04/25/02 Sierra_AirCard 750; Flat section; Frequency: 1850.2MHz) Frequency: 1900 MHz; Crest factor: 2.0 Medium: Muscle 1900 MHz: σ = 1.55 mho/m εr = 53.3 ρ = 1.00 g/cm3 SAM Phantom; Section; Position: Probe: ET3DV6 - SN1578; ConvF(5.10,5.10,5.10); SAR:: , , () Penetration depth: 12.7 (10.4, 16.0) [mm]; Z-Axis: Dx = 0.0, Dy = 0.0, Dz = 2.0 Ambient Temperature (degree C): 23 Liquid Temperature (degree C): 21 0.5 0.4 SAR tot [mW/g] 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 [mm] COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION SERVICES


Document Created: 2002-04-26 18:27:31
Document Modified: 2002-04-26 18:27:31
© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC