Test report

FCC ID: L2C0049TR

Test Report

Download: PDF
FCCID_1590383

University of Michigan Radiation Laboratory FCC Part 15 / IC RSS-210/Gen - Test Report No. 417124-614 The University of Michigan Radiation Laboratory 3228 EECS Building Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2122 Tel: (734) 764-0500 Measured Radio Frequency Emissions From Delphi 76.7 GHz Radar FCC ID: L2C0049TR IC: 3432A-0049TR Report No. 417124-614 October 29, 2011 Copyright © 2011 For: Delphi Automotive Systems One Corporate Center, Kokomo, IN 46904-9005 Contact: Bill Lusa e-mail: bill@w-app.com Tel: 734-484-1387 Fax: 734-484-1389 Tests supervised by: Measurements made by: Valdis V. Liepa Report approved by: _____________________ Joseph D. Brunett Valdis V. Liepa Test Report Prepared by: Joseph D. Brunett Research Scientist Summary Testing for compliance with FCC Regulations Part 15, Subpart C, Section 253 and Industry Canada RSS- 210 was performed on Delphi 76.7 GHz Radar model L2C0049TR. This device is subject to the Rules and Regulations as a Field Disturbance Device. In testing completed on October 10, 2011, we determined that the L2C0049TR meets FCC/IC regulations for average power density at 3 meters by 18.4 dB in the worst case. Spurious emissions meet out of band emissions regulations by more than 10.5 dB. Page 1 of 12

University of Michigan Radiation Laboratory FCC Part 15 / IC RSS-210/Gen - Test Report No. 417124-614 1. Introduction This Delphi 76.7 GHz Radar was tested for compliance with FCC Regulations, Part 15, adopted under Docket 87-389, April 18, 1989 as subsequently amended, and with Industry Canada RSS-210/Gen, Issue 8, December 2010. The tests were performed at the University of Michigan Radiation Laboratory following the procedures described in the FCC MM-Wave Test Procedures. Test site description and attenuation characteristics are on file with FCC Laboratory, Columbia, Maryland (FCC Reg. No: 91050) and with Industry Canada, Ottawa, ON (File Ref. No: IC 2057A-1). 2. Test Procedure and Equipment Used The pertinent test equipment commonly used in our facility for measurements is listed in Table 2.1 below. The middle column identifies the specific equipment used in these tests. Table 2.1 Test Equipment. Test Instrument Eqpt. Used Manufacturer/Model Spectrum Analyzer (9kHz-22GHz) Hewlett-Packard 8593A SN: 3107A01358 Spectrum Analyzer (9kHz-26GHz) Hewlett-Packard 8593E, SN: 3412A01131 Spectrum Analyzer (9kHz-26GHz) X Hewlett-Packard 8563E, SN: 3310A01174 Spectrum Analyzer (9kHz-40GHz) X Hewlett-Packard 8564E, SN: 3745A01031 Power Meter Hewlett-Packard, 432A Power Meter Anritsu, ML4803A/MP Harmonic Mixer (26-40 GHz) X Hewlett-Packard 11970A, SN: 3003A08327 Harmonic Mixer (40-60 GHz) X Hewlett-Packard 11970U, SN: 2332A00500 Harmonic Mixer (50-90 GHz) X Hewlett-Packard 11970V, SN: 2521A00179 Harmonic Mixer (75-110 GHz) X Hewlett-Packard 11970W, SN: 2521A00179 Harmonic Mixer (140-220 GHz) X Pacific Millimeter Prod., GMA, SN: 26 S-Band Std. Gain Horn S/A, Model SGH-2.6 C-Band Std. Gain Horn X University of Michigan, NRL design XN-Band Std. Gain Horn X University of Michigan, NRL design X-Band Std. Gain Horn X S/A, Model 12-8.2 X-band horn (8.2- 12.4 GHz) Narda 640 X-band horn (8.2- 12.4 GHz) Scientific Atlanta , 12-8.2, SN: 730 K-band horn (18-26.5 GHz) FXR, Inc., K638KF Ka-band horn (26.5-40 GHz) X FXR, Inc., U638A U-band horn (40-60 GHz) X Custom Microwave, HO19 W-band horn(75-110 GHz) X Custom Microwave, HO10 G-band horn (140-220 GHz) X Custom Microwave, HO5R Bicone Antenna (30-250 MHz) University of Michigan, RLBC-1 Bicone Antenna (200-1000 MHz) University of Michigan, RLBC-2 Dipole Antenna Set (30-1000 MHz) University of Michigan, RLDP-1,-2,-3 Dipole Antenna Set (30-1000 MHz) EMCO 2131C, SN: 992 Active Rod Antenna (30 Hz-50 MHz) EMCO 3301B, SN: 3223 Active Loop Antenna (30 Hz-50 MHz) EMCO 6502, SN:2855 Ridge-horn Antenna (300-5000 MHz) X University of Michigan Amplifier (5-1000 MHz) Avantak, A11-1, A25-1S Amplifier (5-4500 MHz) X Avantak Amplifier (4.5-13 GHz) X Avantek, AFT-12665 Amplifier (6-16 GHz) X Trek Amplifier (16-26 GHz) X Avantek LISN Box University of Michigan Signal Generator Hewlett-Packard 8657B Page 2 of 12

University of Michigan Radiation Laboratory FCC Part 15 / IC RSS-210/Gen - Test Report No. 417124-614 3. Device Under Test 3.1 Identification The Device Under Test (DUT) is a 76.7 GHz vehicular radar employing two chirp modulated transmit chains, noted herein as Tx1 and Tx2 with 250 MHz chirp bandwidth. The DUT is 12 x 13 x 3.5 cm in dimension. Figure 3.1 Test Configuration Block Diagram 3.2 Variants There are two electrically identical variants of the radar in question, one for the left hand side of the vehicle and one for the right hand side of the vehicle. No electrical or mechanical differences exist between these two variants. 3.4 Samples A laptop was provided to setup radar functionality over the CAN bus, directing the radar to operate in both the normal modulated and CW modes. In CW mode the DUT transmits out of the higher-gain Tx1 chain as discussed below. The nominal operating voltage is 13.4 VDC; for testing this was supplied by a laboratory power supply. 3.3 Modes of Operation The DUT is capable of only one normal modulated mode of operation. When installed on a vehicle, the device operates in this mode when the vehicle is both moving and at rest. The DUT transmits repeated chirps on alternating Tx1 and Tx2 transmit chains. Each transmit chain employs a different antenna radiation pattern. The Tx1 array emits a uniform broadside pattern (normal to the radome) with a manufacturer declared gain of 14dBi, and the Tx2 chain array emits a split-beam end-fire pattern radiating in the direction toward the end of the device with a manufacturer declared gain of 7 dBi. The Tx1 chain transmission repeats with a period of 50 ms, and the Tx2 chain transmission repeats with a 100 ms period. The EUT then receives the returning chirp on a receive array and resolves object locations via digital beam forming. 3.5 EMI/EMC Relevant Modifications There were no modifications made to the DUT by this laboratory. Page 3 of 12

University of Michigan Radiation Laboratory FCC Part 15 / IC RSS-210/Gen - Test Report No. 417124-614 4. Emission Limits 4.1 Radiated Emission Limits The DUT tested falls under the category of an Intentional Radiator, subject to FCC Part 15.253 and Industry Canada RSS-210 / RSS-GEN. The applicable critical testing frequencies with corresponding emission limits are given in Table 4.1. As a digital device this product is exempt because as it is deployed for use only in a motor vehicle. Table 4.1. Radiated Emission Limits (Ref: FCC: 15.253 / RSS-210) Frequency (GHz) Forward Looking Side Looking Not Moving 0.030 - 40000 per 15.209 per 15.209 per 15.209 76.0 - 77.0 60 µW/cm2 30 µW/cm2 200 nW/cm2 40.0 - 200.0 600 pW/cm2 300 pW/cm2 dependent 200.0 - 231.0 1000 pW/cm2 1000 pW/cm2 1000 pW/cm2 5. Test Procedures 5.1 Indoor Measurements Prior to any measurements, all active components of the test setup were allowed a warm-up for a period of approximately one hour, or as recommended by their manufacturers. For the tests, the unit was mounted at a 3 or 1 (or even 0.25 m) meter distance, depending on the available signal strength, and rotated through 360 degrees to determine the most intense radiation lobe. Care is taken such that there is no interference from the hand or body. Due to the rigid connection of the receive antenna to the spectrum analyzer in many instances, the DUT is also rotated around its antenna axes to match the polarization of the emission. 5.2 Field Calculation for Radiated Emission Measurements When the measurement is made at a distance other than 3 m, but is called out at 3 m, the reading is extrapolated to the 3 m distance. This is done using the 20 dB/decade field behavior relation when translating in the far field, and 40 dB/decade relation when translating in the near field. The near- field/far-field criterion, N/F, is based on N/F = 2 D2 / wavelength where D is the maximum dimension of the transmitter or receiver antenna , and the wavelength is that of the measurement frequency. Suppose N/F = 2 m and the measurement is made at 1 m. Here the 40 dB/ decade relation is applied from 1 to 2 m, and a 20 dB/decade relation is applied from 2 to 3 m. In dB, this gives a 15.6 dB adjustment. To convert the dBm measured and extrapolated to 3 m, the E3(dBµV/m) is computed from E3(dBµV/m) = 107 + Pr + CF + Ka - Kg + KE Where Pr = power recorded on spectrum analyzer, dBm (extrapolated to 3 m distance) CF = correction factor to compute peak power value from insufficient Rx bandwidth Ka = antenna factor, dB/m Kg = pre-amp gain, dB KE = pulse operation correction factor, dB (see 6.1) For conversion to power densities specified in 15.253, we used Page 4 of 12

University of Michigan Radiation Laboratory FCC Part 15 / IC RSS-210/Gen - Test Report No. 417124-614 EIRP (dBm) = S (dBm/cm2) + 10 Log10(4 π R(cm)^2) EIRP (dBm) = Pr (dBuV/m) – 95.2 dB Thus, at a 3m distance: EIRP (dBm) = S (dBm/cm2) + 10 Log10(4 π (300)^2) + 95.2 dB = S (dBm/cm2) + 155.74 dB and we note that 200 nW/cm2 = -37.0 dBm/cm2 1000 pW/cm2 = -60.0 dBm/cm2 300 pW/cm2 = -65.2 dBm/cm2 For microwave measurements, either the receive antenna is connected directly to the spectrum analyzer, or it is connected to an external mixer followed by an insignificant length of cable. Hence, no cable loss term is used. The mixer conversion losses are programmed in the spectrum analyzer and are included in the dB values. However, for 125 GHz and up, an external mixer with an external LO and pre-amplifier was used. The mixer conversion loss, IF amp gain and cable losses are included in mixer conversion factor. 6. Test Results 6.1 Correction for Pulse Operation In the following measurements, the maximum spectrum analyzer RBW of 1 MHz was employed. Peak power measurements were made with the DUT employing CW mode on Tx1 channel. Duty cycle correction is then applied to determine the average power values by examining the worst-case time- domain transmission from the DUT at a single frequency for both transmit chains. Duty Cycle to Obtain Average Power When the DUT is operating in normal modulating mode. Tx chain #1 (Tx1) chirps for 17.6 ms with (single frequency) chirp width of 23.6 us / 250 MHz ~ 1 us in a 28 us chirp period. This modulation repeats with a 50 ms period. Tx chain #2 (Tx2) chirps for 16.3 ms with (single frequency) chirp width of 23.6 us / 250 MHz ~ 1 us in a 28 us chirp period. This modulation repeats with a 100 ms period. At the end of each single (Tx1) or paired (Tx1 then Tx2) set of chirp transmissions, the carrier rests in CW at either the lowest, middle, or highest frequency in the 250 MHz chirp bandwidth for approximately 1.6 ms before it is shut-down/attenuated. During this time, it appears to radiate principally through transmit chain Tx1. This “rest” occurs at most twice in any given 100 ms window. As the Tx1 and Tx2 chain radiation patterns overlap for this radar, the worst case single frequency duty cycle is most easily computed where both chains are assumed to contribute to a common emission along the higher gain Tx1 channel. KETX1 = (2 x 1.6 ms + 2 x (1 us / 28 us x 17.6 ms))/ 100 ms) = 0.044 = -13.5 dB KETX2 = (1 us / 28 us x 16.3 ms)/ 100 ms = 0.006 < -20 dB KEboth = (2 x 1.6 ms + 2 (1 us / 28 us x 17.6 ms) + 1 us / 28 us * 16.3 ms)/100 ms) = 0.050 = -13.0 dB 6.2 Potential Health Hazard EM Radiation Level We use two methods to determine health hazard levels and these are obtained (1) by probing the near field and (2) by computing EIRP from measured emission data. (1) Direct measured radiation level from the unit is determined using a W-band Standard Gain horn fed directly into the spectrum analyzer via the harmonic mixer. The analyzer is set to RBW=1 MHz, VBW=3 MHz. The physical aperture of the horn antenna is 1.869 x 2.461cm (A = 4.60 cm2). Its effective aperture (Aeff ) at 76.5 GHz is 2.23 cm2, based on a Gain of 22.6 dB. For the subject DUT, the near-field region was probed, rotating the DUT on all axis and polarizations and moving the DUT closer and closer to the Page 5 of 12

University of Michigan Radiation Laboratory FCC Part 15 / IC RSS-210/Gen - Test Report No. 417124-614 radome. Maximum received power was detected at the center in front of the Tx1 array. The maximum average reading at the radome was Pcw = Pr + KE = -7.1 dBm - 13.0 dB = -20.1 dBm = 0.010 mW Hence the worst case power density of the device at its radome is Smeas (mW/cm2) = Pcw /Aeff = 0.010 mW/ 2.23 cm2 = 0.004 mW/cm2 and meets the FCC Part 1.1307, 1.1310, 2.1091, and 2.0193 requirements. (2) The worst case power density at a given separation distance can be calculated following FCC OET Bulletin 65 as follows, where S is power density, Scalccw (3m) = -55.3 dBm/cm2 (avg. from Table 6.1) EIRPcw = Scalc (3m) x 4π (300 cm)2 = -55.3 + 60.5 = 5.2 dBm = 3.3 mW ERPcw = EIRP – 2.15 = 5.2 – 2.15 = 3.05 dBm = 2.02 mW Scalc (mW/cm2) = EIRP(mW)/(4π R(cm)2). The DUT will be mounted in the bumper of an automobile, with a minimum separation of 1 cm between the radome and the exterior surface of the vehicle. Following the formulation for power density at a distance given the radar’s EIRP is Scalc (mW/cm2) = 3.3 mW /(4π 1cm 2) = 0.262 mW/ cm2. Which is an overestimated value that also demonstrates compliance with FCC Part 1.1307, 1.1310, 2.1091, and 2.0193 requirements when the DUT is mounted in the motor vehicle. 6.3 Effect of Supply Voltage Variation The DUT is designed to operate on 13.4 VDC, originating from a vehicular 12-volt system. The relative radiated emissions and frequency were recorded at the CW mode "fundamental" (76.7 GHz) as the supply voltage was varied from 6 to 18 VDC. Figure 6.2 shows the emission power variation. 6.4 Effect of Temperature Variation on Fundamental Frequency The DUT was cooled to –20 C and its temperature was slowly increased to +55 C, during which time the fundamental emission was monitored. Measurements of band-edge frequencies were taken every 10 C. Figure 6.3 shows the emission center frequency as a function of temperature. 6.5 Sample Field Computations FUNDAMENTAL Refer to: (a) Table 6.2 (f > 40 GHz); line 3 (c) Table 4.1; limit; (200 nW//cm2) To compute the power density we use: P3avg dB(mW/ cm2) = 107 + Pr(3m) + Ka - Kg + KE – 155.74 = 107 – 38.9.0 + 45.3 – 0 – 13.0 – 155.4 = -55.3 dBm/cm2 The limit is 200 nW/cm2 = -37.0 dBm/cm2 Page 6 of 12

University of Michigan Radiation Laboratory FCC Part 15 / IC RSS-210/Gen - Test Report No. 417124-614 SPURIOUS Here we present computation for the reference signal emission at 4.8 GHz. Refer to: (a) Table 6.1 (f < 40 GHz); line 3 (c) Table 4.1; 15.209 limit; 54 dB(µV/m) To compute received power at 3 m from that measured at 1 m, with a N/F transition at 1.49 m we use: Pr(3m) = Pr(1m)-40 x Log10(1.49 m / 1.0 m) – 20 x Log10 (3 m / 1.49 m) and field strength at 3 meters is: E3 dB(µV/m) = 107 + Pr(3m) + Ka - Kg + Ke = 107 – 67.0 + 24.7 – 37.5 + 0 = 27.2 dB(µV/m) The limit is 54.0 dB(µV/m). Page 7 of 12

University of Michigan Radiation Laboratory FCC Part 15 / IC RSS-210/Gen - Test Report No. 417124-614 Table 6.1 Highest Emissions Measured (f<40 GHz) RF/Microwave Radiated Emissions Delphi 49TR Freq. Ant. Ant. Meas. Pr N/F Pr(3m) Ka Kg E3 E3lim Pass # GHz Used D,cm dist, m dBm m dBm dB/m dB dBµV/m dBµV/m dB Comments (Notes) 1 2 to 4.5 R-Horn 15.00 1.00 -69.5 0.30 -79.0 26.0 26.5 27.5 54.0 26.5 Noise, Pk (1,3,4,5,7) 2 4.5 to 6 C-horn 21.6 1.00 -71.9 1.40 -84.4 24.7 37.5 9.8 54.0 44.2 Noise, Pk (1,3,4,5) 3 4.80 C-horn 21.6 1.00 -54.0 1.49 -67.0 24.7 37.5 27.2 54.0 26.8 VCO / 16, Pk (5) 4 6 to 8.6 XN-horn 28.9 1.00 -63.7 3.34 -82.8 25.3 37.0 12.5 54.0 41.5 Noise, Pk (1,3,4,5) 5 8.6to13 X-horn 19.4 3.00 -61.0 2.16 -61.0 28.5 37.0 37.5 54.0 16.5 Noise, Pk (1,3,4,5) 6 9.60 X-horn 19.4 3.00 -56.0 2.41 -56.0 29.5 37.0 43.5 54.0 10.5 VCO / 8, Pk. (8) 7 13to18 Ku-horn 15.2 0.25 -60.4 2.00 -100.1 29.3 17.0 19.2 54.0 34.8 Noise, Pk (1,3,4,5) 9 18to26 K-horn 12.0 0.25 -55.2 1.73 -93.6 33.2 0.0 46.6 54.0 7.4 Noise, Pk (1,3,4,5) 10 26to40 Ka-horn 12.0 0.20 -64.3 2.50 -109.7 36.0 0.0 33.3 54.0 20.7 Noise, Pk (1,3,4,5) 11 12 NOTES: 13 (1) When measured at stated distance from the DUT, no signal was detected. 14 (2) Mixer conversion loss is programmed in the spectrum analyzer and automatically adjusts the readings. 15 (3) When extrapolating to 3 m, use 40 dB/dec to far-field distance (or 3m, if 3m < N/F) and then 20 dB/dec to 3 meters. 16 (4) For Ave. measurement a VBW >= 1% RBW was used; RBW was always 1 MHz. 17 (5) DUT max. antenna size, D = 8.0 cm < test horn antenna dims. 18 (6) Extermal mixer, LO, and 36.5 dB IF amp were used 19 (7) For ridge-horn (R-Horn) use aperture dimension of one half wavelength, all horn aperatures > 8cm DUT aperature. 20 (8) At 9.60 GHz, Peak to Average ratiowas not applied in demonstrating compliance. (Measured with DUT in CW) 21 22 Digital Radiated Emissions* Freq. Ant. Ant. Pr Det. Ka Kg E3 E3lim Pass # MHz Used Pol. dBm Used dB/m dB dBµV/m dBµV/m dB Comments 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 * For devices used in transportation vehicles, digital emissions are exempt from regulations per FCC 15.103(a) and ICES-003e Conducted Emissions* Freq. Line Det. Vtest Vlim Pass # MHz Side Used dBµV dBµV dB Comments 32 33 34 * Not applicable - DUT is powered by motor vehicle system. Meas. 8/1/11-10/15/11; U of Mich. Page 8 of 12

University of Michigan Radiation Laboratory FCC Part 15 / IC RSS-210/Gen - Test Report No. 417124-614 Table 6.2 Highest Emissions Measured (f>40 GHz) RF/Microwave Radiated Emissions Delphi 49TR Freq. Ant. Ant. Meas. Pr N/F Pr(3m) Ka Kg E3 E3lim Pass # GHz Used D,cm dist, m dBm m dBm dB/m dB dBm/cm2 dBm/cm2 dB Comments (Notes) 1 40-76 U-horn 8.0 0.20 -75.8 1.71 -117.9 41.0 0.0 -125.7 -65.2 60.5 Noise, pk. meas. (1-5) 2 76.56 W-horn 8.0 3.00 -39.1 3.27 -39.1 45.3 0.0 -42.5 -17.0 25.5 Signal chirped (pk) meas (2-6,8) 3 76.56 W-horn 8.0 3.00 -39.1 3.27 -39.1 45.3 0.0 -55.5 -37.0 18.5 Signal Avg. (2-7) 4 76.70 W-horn 8.0 3.00 -38.9 3.27 -38.9 45.3 0.0 -42.3 -17.0 25.3 Signal CW pk. meas (2-6) 5 76.70 W-horn 8.0 3.00 -38.9 3.27 -38.9 45.3 0.0 -55.3 -37.0 18.3 Signal Avg. (2-7) 6 76.84 W-horn 8.0 3.00 -39.9 3.28 -39.9 45.3 0.0 -43.3 -17.0 26.3 Signal chirped (pk) meas (2-6,8) 7 76.84 W-horn 8.0 3.00 -39.9 3.28 -39.9 45.3 0.0 -56.3 -37.0 19.3 Signal Avg. (2-7) 8 77-110. W-horn 8.0 0.25 -47.9 3.29 -91.1 46.4 0.0 -93.4 -65.2 28.2 Noise, pk. meas.(1-5) 9 153.12 G-horn 8.0 0.25 -55.2 6.52 -98.4 51.3 0.0 -95.8 -65.2 30.6 Signal, pk. meas. (2-6) 10 229.68 G-horn 8.0 0.25 -77.1 9.78 -120.3 54.0 0.0 -115.0 -60.0 55.0 Noise, pk. meas. (1-6) 11 to 231 G-horn 8.0 0.25 -77.1 9.78 -120.3 54.0 0.0 -115.0 -60.0 55.0 Noise, pk. meas. (1-6) 12 NOTES: 13 (1) When measured at 0.25 cm from the DUT, no signal was detected anywhere, even at the radome. 14 (2) Mixer conversion loss is programmed in the spectrum analyzer and automatically adjusts the readings. 15 (3) When extrapolating to 3 m, use 40 dB/dec to far-field distance (or 3m, if 3m < N/F) and then 20 dB/dec to 3 meters. 16 (4) For Ave. measurement a VBW >= 1% RBW was used; RBW was always 1 MHz. 17 (5) DUT max. antenna size, D = 8.0 cm > All test horn aperatures. 18 (6) Extermal mixer, LO, and 36.5 dB IF amp were used 19 ((7)) Average g Power Limits Apply. pp y Duty y of -13.0 dB applied pp to ppeak CW number ((see section 6.1 of test report) p ) 20 (8) Peak fundamental emission at ends of band could only be measured in chirp mode, DUT cw mode is only avaliable at middle of band. 21 RF Health Hazard - Fundamental Freq. Ant. Ant. Meas. Pr N/F Pr(3m) Ka Kg E3 EIRP S (1cm) # GHz Used D,cm dist, m dBm m dBm dB/m dB dBm/cm2 dBm mW/cm2 Comments (Notes) 22 76.4 W-horn 8.0 3.00 -38.9 3.26 -38.9 45.3 0.0 -42.3 18.2 5.25 Peak 23 76.4 W-horn 8.0 3.00 -38.9 3.26 -38.9 45.3 0.0 -55.3 5.2 0.26 Average 24 RF Health Hazard - Spurious Freq. Ant. Ant. Meas. Pr N/F Pr(3m) Ka Kg E3 EIRP S (1cm) # GHz Used D,cm dist, m dBm m dBm dB/m dB dBµV/m dBm mW/cm2 Comments (Notes) 25 4.80 C-horn 21.6 1.00 -54.0 0.15 -63.5 24.7 37.5 30.7 -64.5 0.000000 Peak 26 9.60 X-horn 19.4 3.00 -56.0 2.41 -56.0 29.5 37.0 43.5 -51.7 0.000001 Peak 27 28 29 30 31 32 Meas. 8/1/11-10/15/11; U of Mich. Page 9 of 12

University of Michigan Radiation Laboratory FCC Part 15 / IC RSS-210/Gen - Test Report No. 417124-614 Fig. 6.1(a) Emission Spectrum + Emission Bandwidth Fig. 6.1(b) Average Emissions dominate at Low, (Tx1 + Tx2 along boresight) Mid, High Fig. 6.1(c) Center Frequency Time Domain Chirp Fig. 6.1(d) Repeated Chirp Sequence for Tx1 and Tx2 Chains Fig. 6.1(e) Tx1 Chain Chirp duration measured Fig. 6.1(f) Tx2 Chain Chirp duration measured (17.7 ms). (16.3 ms) Page 10 of 12

University of Michigan Radiation Laboratory FCC Part 15 / IC RSS-210/Gen - Test Report No. 417124-614 Fig. 6.1(g) CW “rest” emission measured (1.600 ms) Fig. 6.1(h) Single frequency chirp period (same for Tx1&2 chains) Fig. 6.2 Relative amplitude vs. supply voltage. Fig. 6.3 Relative CW frequency vs. supply voltage. Page 11 of 12

University of Michigan Radiation Laboratory FCC Part 15 / IC RSS-210/Gen - Test Report No. 417124-614 High Frequency DUT test setup (one of three axes tested) High Frequency DUT test setup (one of three axes tested) Page 12 of 12


Document Created: 2011-11-21 06:51:49
Document Modified: 2011-11-21 06:51:49
© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC