TestRpt_Power Density_0213

FCC ID: IHDT56XL1

RF Exposure Info

Download: PDF
FCCID_4168377

RF EXPOSURE EVALUATION REPORT Report No. : FA890514B RF EXPOSURE EVALUATION REPORT FCC ID : IHDT56XL1 Equipment : Mobile 5G MOD Brand Name : Motorola Applicant : Motorola Mobility LLC 222 W,Merchandise Mart Plaza, Chicago IL 60654 USA Manufacturer : Motorola Mobility LLC 222 W,Merchandise Mart Plaza, Chicago IL 60654 USA Standard : FCC 47 CFR Part 2 (2.1093) We, SPORTON INTERNATIONAL INC have been evaluated in accordance with 47 CFR Part 2.1091 for the device and pass the limit. The test results in this variant report apply exclusively to the tested model / sample. Without written approval of SPORTON INTERNATIONAL INC. EMC & Wireless Communications Laboratory, the test report shall not be reproduced except in full. Approved by: Cona Huang / Deputy Manager SPORTON INTERNATIONAL INC. EMC & Wireless Communications Laboratory No. 52, Huaya 1st Rd., Guishan Dist., Taoyuan City, Taiwan (R.O.C.) TEL : 886-3-327-3456 Page 1 of 27 FAX : 886-3-328-4978 Issued Date : Feb. 07, 2019 Form version: 180516

RF EXPOSURE EVALUATION REPORT Report No. : FA890514B Table of Contents 1. Summary ........................................................................................................................................................................ 4 2. Guidance Applied .......................................................................................................................................................... 4 3. Equipment Under Test (EUT) Information ................................................................................................................... 5 3.1 General Information ............................................................................................................................................... 5 4. RF Exposure Limits....................................................................................................................................................... 6 4.1 Uncontrolled Environment ...................................................................................................................................... 6 4.2 Controlled Environment.......................................................................................................................................... 6 5. System Description and Setup .................................................................................................................................... 7 5.1 EUmmWave Probe / E-Field 5G Probe .................................................................................................................. 8 5.2 Data Acquisition Electronics (DAE) ........................................................................................................................ 9 5.3 Scan configuration ................................................................................................................................................. 9 6. Test Equipment List .....................................................................................................................................................10 7. System Verification Source .........................................................................................................................................11 8. Power Density System Verification ............................................................................................................................12 9. System Verification Results ........................................................................................................................................12 10. EIRP Power .................................................................................................................................................................13 11. Sensor Detector Test Procedure ..............................................................................................................................16 12. Power Density Measurement Evaluation .................................................................................................................20 12.1 Computation of the Electric Field Polarization Ellipse .........................................................................................21 12.2 Total Field and Power Flux Density Reconstruction ............................................................................................21 12.3 Test Positions ......................................................................................................................................................22 13. RF Exposure Evaluation Results ..............................................................................................................................23 14. Simultaneous Transmission Analysis ......................................................................................................................25 15. Uncertainty Assessment ...........................................................................................................................................26 16. References ..................................................................................................................................................................27 Appendix A. Plots of System Performance Check Appendix B. Plots of Power Density Measurement Appendix C. DASY Calibration Certificate Appendix D. Simultaneous Transmission analysis Appendix E. Antenna Location & Test Setup Photos TEL : 886-3-327-3456 Page 2 of 27 FAX : 886-3-328-4978 Issued Date : Feb. 07, 2019 Form version: 180516

RF EXPOSURE EVALUATION REPORT Report No. : FA890514B History of this test report Report No. Version Description Issued Date FA890514B 01 Initial issue of report Dec. 28, 2018 FA890514B 02 Updated sensor verification procedure in section 11 Feb. 01, 2019 FA890514B 03 added the description for test positions Feb. 07, 2019 TEL : 886-3-327-3456 Page 3 of 27 FAX : 886-3-328-4978 Issued Date : Feb. 07, 2019 Form version: 180516

seortrow cas. _RF EXPOSURE EVALUATION REPORT Report No. : FA890514B 1. Summary The maximum measured average power density found during testing for Motorola Mobility LLC, Mobile 5G MOD, are as follows. NC Simultaneous transmission with Standalone transmission other transmitters Highest Total Power Density, Limit (FCC part 1.310) averaging over 4cm P o i Summation of Exposure Ratio (mW/cmZ) (mW/cm") 5GNR n261 2. Guidance Applied The Power Density testing specification, method, and procedure for this device is in accordance with the following standards: FCC 47 CFR Part 2.1091 FCC 47 CFR Part 2.1093 FCC KDB 865664 D02 SAR Reporting v01r02 FCC KDB 447498 DO1 General RF Exposure Guidance v06 FCC KDB 648474 D04 SAR Evaluation Considerations for Wireless Handsets v01r08 TCBC workshop notes IEC Draft TR 63170 TEL : 886—3—327—3456 Page 4 of 27 FAX : 886—3—328—4978 Issued Date : Feb. 07, 2019 Form version: 180516

RF EXPOSURE EVALUATION REPORT Report No. : FA890514B 3. Equipment Under Test (EUT) Information 3.1 General Information Product Feature & Specification Equipment Name Mobile 5G MOD Brand Name Motorola FCC ID IHDT56XL1 HW Version DVT2 HW Version PPZ29.67 EUT Stage Identical Prototype LTE LTE Band 2: 1850.7 MHz ~ 1909.3 MHz LTE Band 4: 1710.7 MHz ~ 1754.3 MHz Wireless Technology and Frequency LTE Band 5: 824.7 MHz ~ 848.3 MHz Range LTE Band 13: 779.5 MHz ~ 784.5 MHz LTE Band 66: 1710.7 MHz ~ 1779.3 MHz LTE Band 48: 3552.5 MHz ~ 3697.5 MHz Modulation LTE: QPSK, 16QAM, 64QAM 5GNR Wireless Technology and Frequency 5G NR n261: 27.5GHz~28.35GHz Range Modulation 5GNR n261: QPSK, 16QAM, and 64QAM for CP-OFDM Supported Channel Bandwidth 50MHz/100MHz Maximum Number of contiguous CC 4CC Maximum Aggregated Bandwidth 400MHz Max. Uplink Transmission Duty Cycle 100% Supports dual-polarization MIMO (2 × 2 uplink (UL) and 2 × 2 downlink (DL)) Antenna Information This device has 4 antenna array modules , only one module can be turned on and transmit at a time. 5GNR Operation Non-Standalone (NSA) Mode EN-DC combination DC_2_n261, DC_4_n261, DC_5_n261, DC_13_n261, DC_66_n261 Remark: 1. The MOD is snapped onto the smartphone IHDT56XJ1, and supports multiple antenna transmission, therefore need to consider simultaneous transmission analysis for SAR and PD, the WWAN and WLAN SAR test results were referring to the report of FCC ID: IHDT56XL1 (Sporton SAR Report No. FA851503). Power density is evaluated with the MOD attached on the phone. 2. For 5G n261 operation, the device has 4 array modules and only one will transmit at a time. The device has implements the sensor to detect the human proximity, once the sensor detects and is triggered, the associated antenna array module will disable the transmission and switch to one of the other 3 array module. Detailed illustration of the sensor implementation is in the operation description. 3. For front facing array module (Array Module 2) , when earpiece signal from phone indicates operation at head, this array module would be disabled, therefore head exposure condition evaluation is not required. Reviewed by: Eric Huang Report Producer: Wan Liu TEL : 886-3-327-3456 Page 5 of 27 FAX : 886-3-328-4978 Issued Date : Feb. 07, 2019 Form version: 180516

RF EXPOSURE EVALUATION REPORT Report No. : FA890514B 4. RF Exposure Limits 4.1 Uncontrolled Environment Uncontrolled Environments are defined as locations where there is the exposure of individuals who have no knowledge or control of their exposure. The general population/uncontrolled exposure limits are applicable to situations in which the general public may be exposed or in which persons who are exposed as a consequence of their employment may not be made fully aware of the potential for exposure or cannot exercise control over their exposure. Members of the general public would come under this category when exposure is not employment-related; for example, in the case of a wireless transmitter that exposes persons in its vicinity. 4.2 Controlled Environment Controlled Environments are defined as locations where there is exposure that may be incurred by persons who are aware of the potential for exposure, (i.e. as a result of employment or occupation). In general, occupational/controlled exposure limits are applicable to situations in which persons are exposed as a consequence of their employment, who have been made fully aware of the potential for exposure and can exercise control over their exposure. The exposure category is also applicable when the exposure is of a transient nature due to incidental passage through a location where the exposure levels may be higher than the general population/uncontrolled limits, but the exposed person is fully aware of the potential for exposure and can exercise control over his or her exposure by leaving the area or by some other appropriate means. The criteria listed in Table 1 shall be used to evaluate the environmental impact of human exposure above 6GHz to radio frequency (RF) radiation as specified in §1.1310. 2 General Population Basic restriction for power density for frequencies between 1.5GHz and 100 GHz is 1.0 mW/cm = 10 2 W/m Table 1 TEL : 886-3-327-3456 Page 6 of 27 FAX : 886-3-328-4978 Issued Date : Feb. 07, 2019 Form version: 180516

RF EXPOSURE EVALUATION REPORT Report No. : FA890514B 5. System Description and Setup The system to be used for the near field power density measurement  SPEAG DASY6 system  SPEAG cDASY6 5G module software  EUmmWV2 probe  5G Phantom cover TEL : 886-3-327-3456 Page 7 of 27 FAX : 886-3-328-4978 Issued Date : Feb. 07, 2019 Form version: 180516

RF EXPOSURE EVALUATION REPORT Report No. : FA890514B 5.1 EUmmWave Probe / E-Field 5G Probe The probe design allows measurements at distances as small as 2 mm from the sensors to the surface of the device under test (DUT). The typical sensor to probe tip distance is 1.5 mm. Frequency 750 MHz – 110 GHz Probe Overall Length 320 mm Probe Body Diameter 8.0 mm Tip Length 23.0 mm Tip Diameter 8.0 mm Probe’s two dipoles length 0.9 mm – Diode loaded Dynamic Range < 20 V/m - 10000 V/m with PRE-10 (min < 50 V/m - 3000 V/m) Position Precision < 0.2 mm Distance between diode sensors and 1.5 mm probe’s tip Minimum Mechanical separation 0.5 mm between probe tip and a Surface E-field measurements of 5G devices and other mm-wave transmitters Applications operating above 10GHz in < 2 mm distance from device (free-space) Power density, H-field and far-field analysis using total field reconstruction. Compatibility cDASY6 + 5G-Module SW1.0 and higher TEL : 886-3-327-3456 Page 8 of 27 FAX : 886-3-328-4978 Issued Date : Feb. 07, 2019 Form version: 180516

seonron cas. _RF EXPOSURE EVALUATION REPORT Report No. : FA890514B 5.2 Data Acquisition Electronics (DAE) The data acquisition electronics (DAE) consists of a highly sensitive electrometer—grade preamplifier with auto—zeroing, a channel and gain—switching multiplexer, a fast 16 bit AD—converter and a command decoder and control logic unit. Transmission to the measurement server is accomplished through an optical downlink for data and status information as well as an optical uplink for commands and the clock. The input impedance of the DAE is 200 MOhm; the inputs are symmetrical and floating. Common mode rejection is above 80 dB. 5.3 Scan configuration Fine—resolution scans on 2 different planes are performed to reconstruct the E— and H—fields as well as the power density; the z—distance between the 2 planes is setto ¥ /4. The (x, y) grid step is also set 2 /4, the grid extent is set to sufficiently large to identify the field pattern and the peak. TEL : 886—3—327—3456 Page 9 of 27 FAX : 886—3—328—4978 Issued Date ; Feb. 07, 2019 Form version: 180516

RF EXPOSURE EVALUATION REPORT Report No. : FA890514B 6. Test Equipment List Calibration Manufacturer Name of Equipment Type/Model Serial Number Last Cal. Due Date SPEAG 5G Verification Source 30 GHz 1007 Apr. 06, 2018 Apr. 05, 2019 SPEAG 5G Verification Source 30 GHz 1009 Jun. 29, 2018 Jun. 28, 2019 SPEAG EUmmWV Probe Tip Protection EUmmWV2 9388 Apr. 10, 2018 Apr. 09, 2019 SPEAG EUmmWV Probe Tip Protection EUmmWV2 9390 Jun. 28, 2018 Jun. 27, 2019 SPEAG Data Acquisition Electronics DAE4 918 Jun. 20, 2018 Jun. 19, 2019 SPEAG Data Acquisition Electronics DAE4 778 May. 25, 2018 May. 24, 2019 SPEAG Data Acquisition Electronics DAE4 1326 Sep. 18, 2018 Sep. 17, 2019 TESTO Hygro meter 608-H1 34913631 Aug. 27, 2018 Aug. 26, 2019 Rohde & Schwarz Spectrum Analyzer FSV40 101408 Jul. 30, 2018 Jul. 29, 2019 Custom Microwave Standard Horn antenna M15RH V91113-A NCR NCR TEL : 886-3-327-3456 Page 10 of 27 FAX : 886-3-328-4978 Issued Date : Feb. 07, 2019 Form version: 180516

seortrow cas. _RF EXPOSURE EVALUATION REPORT Report No. : FA890514B 7. System Verification Source The System Verification sources at 30 GHz and above comprise horn—antennas and very stable signal generators. PCAS Ka—band horn antenna Calibrated frequency: 30 GHz at 10mm from the case surface Frequency accuracy + 100 MHz E—field polarization linear Harmonics —20 dBc Total radiated power 14 dBm Power stability 0.05 dB Power consumption 5W Size 00 x 100 x 100 mm Weight 1 kg TEL : 886—3—327—3456 Page 11 of 27 FAX : 886—3—328—4978 Issued Date : Feb. 07, 2019 Form version: 180516

RF EXPOSURE EVALUATION REPORT Report No. : FA890514B 8. Power Density System Verification The system performance check verifies that the system operates within its specifications. The EUT is replaced by a calibrated source, the same spatial resolution, measurement region and the test separation used in the calibration was applied to system check. Through visual inspection into the measured power density distribution, both spatially (shape) and numerically (level) have no noticeable difference. The measured results should be within 10% of the calibrated targets. Settings for measurement of verification sources Verification Setup photo 9. System Verification Results 5G Measured Targeted Frequency Probe DAE Distance Deviation Date Verification 4 cm² 4 cm² (GHz) S/N S/N (mm) (%) Source (W/m²) (W/m²) 2018/12/11 30GHz 30GHz-1007 9388 918 10 36.3 33.6 8.04 2018/12/16 30GHz 30GHz-1009 9390 778 10 39.9 41.3 -3.39 2018/12/18 30GHz 30GHz-1007 9388 1326 10 33.4 33.6 -0.6 TEL : 886-3-327-3456 Page 12 of 27 FAX : 886-3-328-4978 Issued Date : Feb. 07, 2019 Form version: 180516

seonton cas. RF EXPOSURE EVALUATION REPORT Report No. : FA890514B 10. EIRP Power The beam configurations for PD measurement are identified from the simulation report, the EIRP reported in this section is for reference on! uec ols Maximum Average Cmmillalnniiie module Beam ID 1 Beam ID 2 (GHz) oeleucl Modulation EIRP [dBm] 33 157 27.925 1RB_O0 offset QPSK, CP—OFDM 23.54 49 177 27.925 1RB_O offset QPSK, CP—OFDM 21.67 100 MHz 0 31 161 27.925 1RB_O offset QPSK, CP—OFDM 22.35 61 189 27.925 1RB_O offset QPSK, CP—OFDM 21.28 antenna ucetco) Euedecrtd Bandwidth Beam ID 1 Beam ID 2 (GHz) RB allocation modulation module EIRP [dBm] 26 153 27.925 1RB_0 offset QPSK, CP—OFDM 22.41 100 MHz 1 28 155 27.925 1RB_O0 offset QPSK, CP—OFDM 22.42 44 172 27.925 1RB_0 offset QPSK, CP—OFDM 22.36 antenna ucetco) Euedecrtd Bandwidth Euie Beam ID 2 RB allocation Modulation module (GHz) EIRP [dBm] 59 186 27.925 1RB_O0 offset QPSK, CP—OFDM 19.09 43 167 27.925 1RB_0 offset QPSK, CP—OFDM 18.94 42 169 27.925 1RB_0 offset QPSK, CP—OFDM 18.21 100 MHz 2 56 187 27.925 1RB_0 offset QPSK, CP—OFDM 16.27 41 168 27.925 1RB_0 offset QPSK, CP—OFDM 15.91 43 167 27.925 1RB_0 offset QPSK, CP—OFDM 18.94 Bandwidth :‘;Z'L'I': e iepe) F'Tg‘:lez';cy RB allocation Modulation Ma’::;‘;";d‘;'s]age 36 164 27.925 1AB_0 offset aPSK, CP—OFDM 19.33 62 180 27.925 1AB_0 offset aPSK, CP—OFDM 19.01 52 180 27.925 1AB_0 offset aPSK, CP—OFDM 19.86 54 182 27.925 1AB_0 offset aPSK, CP—OFDM 19.45 100 MHz 3 53 181 27.925 1AB_0 offset aPSK, CP—OFDM 1816 38 165 27.925 1AB_0 offset aPSK, CP—OFDM 18.25 34 162 27.925 1AB_0 offset aPSK, CP—OFDM 1918 37 166 27.925 1AB_0 offset aPSK, CP—OFDM 19.08 as 163 27.925 1RB_0 offset apsk, CP—oFpm 19.72 TEL : 886—3—327—3456 Page 13 of 27 FAX : 886—3—328—4978 Issued Date : Feb. 07, 2019 Form version: 180516

RF EXPOSURE EVALUATION REPORT Report No. : FA890514B NR Band n261 Module 0 (Beam ID 33, 157) Maximum Average EIRP [dBm] Lowest frequency Middle frequency Highest frequency BW [MHz] RB Size RB Offset Mod 27.525 GHz 27.925 GHz 28.325GHz 50 1 0 24.05 23.51 23.62 QPSK 50 32 0 24.18 23.66 24.07 50 1 0 23.12 22.29 22.02 16-QAM 50 32 0 23.42 22.81 22.68 50 1 0 21.53 21.03 20.10 64-QAM 50 32 0 21.27 20.91 21.28 Lowest frequency Middle frequency Highest frequency BW [MHz] RB Size RB Offset Mod 27.55 GHz 27.925 GHz 28.3 GHz 100 1 0 24.78 23.54 23.44 QPSK 100 66 0 24.36 23.88 23.46 100 1 0 23.45 22.20 22.40 16-QAM 100 66 0 23.24 22.90 22.23 100 1 0 22.02 20.51 20.26 64-QAM 100 66 0 21.29 20.96 20.37 Lowest frequency Middle frequency Highest frequency BW [MHz] RB Size RB Offset Mod 27.70 GHz 27.925 GHz 28.15 GHz 400 66 0 QPSK 22.63 22.67 21.92 400 66 0 16-QAM 21.52 21.66 20.41 400 66 0 64-QAM 18.99 19.08 18.22 NR Band n261 Module 1 (Beam ID 28, 155) Maximum Average EIRP [dBm] Lowest frequency Middle frequency Highest frequency BW [MHz] RB Size RB Offset Mod 27.525 GHz 27.925 GHz 28.325GHz 50 1 0 23.18 21.92 20.16 QPSK 50 32 0 22.96 21.86 20.50 50 1 0 22.50 21.25 19.53 16-QAM 50 32 0 21.75 20.87 19.27 50 1 0 20.20 19.00 17.29 64-QAM 50 32 0 19.79 18.87 17.39 Lowest frequency Middle frequency Highest frequency BW [MHz] RB Size RB Offset Mod 27.55 GHz 27.925 GHz 28.3 GHz 100 1 0 22.62 22.42 21.30 QPSK 100 66 0 22.37 22.43 20.96 100 1 0 22.36 21.43 20.71 16-QAM 100 66 0 21.56 21.20 20.25 100 1 0 19.97 18.97 18.44 64-QAM 100 66 0 19.46 19.18 18.26 Lowest frequency Middle frequency Highest frequency BW [MHz] RB Size RB Offset Mod 27.70 GHz 27.925 GHz 28.15 GHz 400 66 0 QPSK 19.37 18.61 18.46 400 66 0 16-QAM 18.67 17.73 17.25 400 66 0 64-QAM 16.06 15.15 14.85 TEL : 886-3-327-3456 Page 14 of 27 FAX : 886-3-328-4978 Issued Date : Feb. 07, 2019 Form version: 180516

RF EXPOSURE EVALUATION REPORT Report No. : FA890514B NR Band n261 Module 2 (Beam ID 59, 186) Maximum Average EIRP [dBm] Lowest frequency Middle frequency Highest frequency BW [MHz] RB Size RB Offset Mod 27.525 GHz 27.925 GHz 28.325GHz 50 1 0 20.17 19.31 16.20 QPSK 50 32 0 20.06 19.13 16.37 50 1 0 19.90 18.73 15.73 16-QAM 50 32 0 19.37 18.17 15.33 50 1 0 17.79 16.43 13.48 64-QAM 50 32 0 17.71 16.22 13.58 Lowest frequency Middle frequency Highest frequency BW [MHz] RB Size RB Offset Mod 27.55 GHz 27.925 GHz 28.3 GHz 100 1 0 20.34 19.09 16.54 QPSK 100 66 0 19.90 19.03 16.46 100 1 0 19.79 18.71 15.92 16-QAM 100 66 0 19.10 17.93 15.52 100 1 0 17.58 16.41 13.67 64-QAM 100 66 0 17.10 16.12 13.56 Lowest frequency Middle frequency Highest frequency BW [MHz] RB Size RB Offset Mod 27.70 GHz 27.925 GHz 28.15 GHz 400 66 0 QPSK 19.73 18.61 18.46 400 66 0 16-QAM 18.67 17.73 17.25 400 66 0 64-QAM 16.06 15.15 14.85 NR Band n261 Module 3 (Beam ID 35, 163) Maximum Average EIRP [dBm] Lowest frequency Middle frequency Highest frequency BW [MHz] RB Size RB Offset Mod 27.525 GHz 27.925 GHz 28.325GHz 50 1 0 22.55 21.41 18.59 QPSK 50 32 0 22.63 21.09 18.09 50 1 0 22.01 20.92 17.98 16-QAM 50 32 0 21.72 20.08 16.99 50 1 0 19.92 18.65 15.72 64-QAM 50 32 0 19.89 18.25 15.06 Lowest frequency Middle frequency Highest frequency BW [MHz] RB Size RB Offset Mod 27.55 GHz 27.925 GHz 28.3 GHz 100 1 0 21.79 19.72 17.16 QPSK 100 66 0 21.76 20.19 17.65 100 1 0 21.25 19.09 16.66 16-QAM 100 66 0 20.83 19.06 16.75 100 1 0 19.11 16.80 14.24 64-QAM 100 66 0 18.94 17.12 14.84 Lowest frequency Middle frequency Highest frequency BW [MHz] RB Size RB Offset Mod 27.70 GHz 27.925 GHz 28.15 GHz 400 66 0 QPSK 21.26 19.74 19.48 400 66 0 16-QAM 19.72 18.68 17.92 400 66 0 64-QAM 19.67 15.60 14.51 TEL : 886-3-327-3456 Page 15 of 27 FAX : 886-3-328-4978 Issued Date : Feb. 07, 2019 Form version: 180516

RF EXPOSURE EVALUATION REPORT Report No. : FA890514B 11. Sensor Detector Test Procedure 1. The device has implements the sensor to detect the human proximity, once the sensor detects and is triggered, the associated antenna array module will disable the transmission and switch to one of the other 3 array module. Detailed illustration of the sensor implementation is in the operation description. 2. The device under test is mounted on a support that can hold it at the desired test orientation and test distance, and the device on its mount is then slid under the flat phantom filled with normal temperature water, while the control software is monitored to determine if/when the sensor is triggered. The basic setup is illustrated in below figure. 3. All tests are performed with the 5G Mod attached to the host phone device. The procedure for testing is as follows: 1. Adjust the height of the 5G Mod on the platform 2. Place the platform w/ the 5G Mod away from the Flat Phantom 3. Move the platform w/ 5G Mod under the center of Flat Phantom 4. Check the sensor state, mmwave array module ON/OFF state 5. Repeated above procedure in 1 cm steps until the sensor release. 6. This basic test procedure was applied at multiple spacings, in 1 cm increments, starting from a large spacing and reducing to a small spacing, and starting from a small spacing, and increasing to a large spacing. In this way the minimum detection distance was established for each module, and any hysteresis effects were taken into account. Steps of 1 cm were employed, rather than smaller steps of 3 or 1 mm as are commonly used to test capacitive proximity sensors, because of the much larger operational range of the thermal sensor. Note that using a larger step size of 1 cm produces a more conservative result, i.e. the smallest detection distance so found is equal to or less than that which would be found if using smaller step sizes like 1 mm. 7. Additionally, the test procedure was followed at a close distance of 5 mm from the device, to establish the extents of the angular cone of detection of each sensor, which was used to establish the measurement inclusion and exclusion zones in those measurement planes. Testing at this close spacing (corresponding to the actual measurement planes) is a more conservative means of establishing these characteristics of the sensor. Result: Right/Left/Back array module will turn off at detection distance of 12cm, Front array module turns off at detection distance of 7cm. Test separation of 7cm was chosen conservatively for ALL array module TEL : 886-3-327-3456 Page 16 of 27 FAX : 886-3-328-4978 Issued Date : Feb. 07, 2019 Form version: 180516

RF EXPOSURE EVALUATION REPORT Report No. : FA890514B Sensor Trigger Distance Sensor Detect Distance Sensor Undetect Distance Sensor Location (mm) (mm) Sensor 0 (Array Module 0) Right Side 12 13 Sensor 1 (Array Module 1) Left Side 12 13 Sensor 2 (Array Module 2) Top Front 7 8 Sensor 3 (Array Module 3) Top Rear 12 13 Note: State 1: Senor Detect, Array module off State 0: Senor Undetect, Array module on TEL : 886-3-327-3456 Page 17 of 27 FAX : 886-3-328-4978 Issued Date : Feb. 07, 2019 Form version: 180516

RF EXPOSURE EVALUATION REPORT Report No. : FA890514B These angular results are summarized in the table below: Measured angular responses of Sensor 0 at the 5 mm test separation distance. Measured angular responses of Sensor 1 at the 5 mm test separation distance. Measured angular responses of Sensor 2 at the 5 mm test separation distance. TEL : 886-3-327-3456 Page 18 of 27 FAX : 886-3-328-4978 Issued Date : Feb. 07, 2019 Form version: 180516

RF EXPOSURE EVALUATION REPORT Report No. : FA890514B Measured angular responses of Sensor 3 at the 5 mm test separation distance. TEL : 886-3-327-3456 Page 19 of 27 FAX : 886-3-328-4978 Issued Date : Feb. 07, 2019 Form version: 180516

RF EXPOSURE EVALUATION REPORT Report No. : FA890514B 12. Power Density Measurement Evaluation 1. The 5G NR n261 signal under testing was configured by test Qualcomm software, and the test tool can be used and set the relevant 5G radio parameters (e.g. TX carrier, polarization, band, channel, bandwidth and output power etc.) 2. The device was configured to transmit maximum power and at 100% duty cycle, for each RB configuration/modulation/bandwidth/channel to be tested 3. Since the device Supports dual-polarization MIMO (2 × 2 uplink (UL) and 2 × 2 downlink (DL), therefore the device under test was configured beam pair testing at a time. 4. According to manufacturer simulation test results for different antenna modules and exposure planes, limited worst cases were selected for power density measurement. 5. This device support 5GNR n261.The frequency range is 27.5GHz to 28.35GHz. The maximum supporting bandwidth is 400MHz for UL. The modulation type is QPSK, 16QAM, and 64QAM for CP-OFDM for both of DL and UL and the Subcarrier spacing is120 kHz. 6. According to TCBC Workshop in October 2018, 4 cm2 averaging area may now be considered. 7. The power density test separation distance and test conditions were confirmed by FCC in the lab KDB inquiry. The device implements the sensor detection, so that for some device orientations the PD test at default test separation was skipped and PD was tested at larger distance which represents the sensor detection range 8. Above 6 GHz, Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) limits apply to portable exposure conditions according to 47 CFR §2.1093. TEL : 886-3-327-3456 Page 20 of 27 FAX : 886-3-328-4978 Issued Date : Feb. 07, 2019 Form version: 180516

RF EXPOSURE EVALUATION REPORT Report No. : FA890514B 12.1 Computation of the Electric Field Polarization Ellipse For the numerical description of an arbitrarily oriented ellipse in three-dimensional space, five parameters are needed: the semi-major axis (a), the semi-minor axis (b), two angles describing the orientation of the normal vector of the ellipse (∅, θ), and one angle describing the tilt of the semi-major axis (ψ). For the two extreme cases, i.e., circular and linear polarizations, three parameters only (a, ∅ and θ) are sufficient for the description of the incident field. Illustration of the angles used for the numerical description of the sensor and the orientation of an ellipse in 3-D space. For the reconstruction of the ellipse parameters from measured data, the problem can be reformulated as a nonlinear search problem. The semi-major and semi-minor axes of an elliptical field can be expressed as functions of the three angles (∅, θ and ψ). The parameters can be uniquely determined towards minimizing the error based on least-squares for the given set of angles and the measured data. In this way, the number of free parameters is reduced from five to three, which means that at least three sensor readings are necessary to gain sufficient information for the reconstruction of the ellipse parameters. However, to suppress the noise and increase the reconstruction accuracy, it is desirable that the system of equations be over determined. The solution to use a probe consisting of two sensors angled by r1 and r2 toward the probe axis and to perform measurements at three angular positions of the probe, i.e., at β1, β2 and β3, results in over-determinations by a factor of two. If there is a need for more information or increased accuracy, more rotation angles can be added. The reconstruction of the ellipse parameters can be separated into linear and non-linear parts that are best solved by the Givens algorithm combined with a downhill simplex algorithm. To minimize the mutual coupling, sensor angles are set with a shift of 90 degree (r2 = r1 + 90 degree), and to simplify, the first rotation angle of the probe (β1) can be set to 0 degree 12.2 Total Field and Power Flux Density Reconstruction Computation of the power density in general requires knowledge of the electric and magnetic field amplitudes and phases in the plane of incidence. Reconstruction of these quantities from pseudo-vector E-field measurements is feasible, as they are constrained by Maxwell's equations. SPEAG have developed a reconstruction approach based on the Gerchberg-Saxton algorithm, which benefits from the availability of the E-field polarization ellipse information obtained with the EUmmWV2 probe. The average of the reconstructed power density is evaluated over a circular area in each measurement plane. Two average power density values can be computed, the average total power density and the average incident power density, and the average total power density is used to determine compliance. The software post-processing reports to values, “S avg tot” and “S avg inc”. “S avg tot” represents average total power density (all three xyz components included), and “S avg inc” represents average normal power density. The average total power density “S avg tot” is reported to determine the device compliance. TEL : 886-3-327-3456 Page 21 of 27 FAX : 886-3-328-4978 Issued Date : Feb. 07, 2019 Form version: 180516

RF EXPOSURE EVALUATION REPORT Report No. : FA890514B 12.3 Test Positions Measurement Plane Module Comment Back @ 5 Left @ Right @ 5 Top @ Bottom @ Front @ Front @ 2 mm 5 mm mm 5 mm 5 mm 5 mm mm 0 Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Principal plane excluded by prox sensor Principal plane excluded by prox sensor; 1 Yes Yes No Yes No No Yes bottom plane excluded due to very low PD due to large distance Principal plane 2mm test separation excluded by talk position logic; bottom plane 2 Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No excluded due to very low PD due to large distance Principal plane excluded by prox sensor; 3 No Yes Yes Yes No No Yes bottom plane excluded due to very low PD due to large distance Measurement Plane Module Comment Back @ Left @ Right @ Top @ Bottom @ Front @ 70 mm 70 mm 70 mm 70 mm 70 mm 70 mm 0 No Yes No No No No 1 No No Yes No No No Principle plane is measured at conservative prox sensor release distance. 2 No No No No No Yes 3 Yes No No No No No TEL : 886-3-327-3456 Page 22 of 27 FAX : 886-3-328-4978 Issued Date : Feb. 07, 2019 Form version: 180516

RF EXPOSURE EVALUATION REPORT Report No. : FA890514B 13. RF Exposure Evaluation Results 1. The test position/separation and the area to scan for each test is selected and identified in the simulation report, details in illustrated in the simulation report exhibit and the operational description. 2. For each array module, power density for different combinations of RB/modulation/bandwidth and also low/middle/high channel was executed at the worst position. 3. The test positions are defined per the front view of phone+Mod. Note that for the measurements, "right" and "left" are referenced with respect to viewing from the front, display side of the phone+Mod, but it contrasts with the reference used in the simulation reports which the reference is from the back view of the Mod" 4. 2 mm “Test separation” means 0.5 mm between probe-housing tip and DUT, with 1.5 mm from probe-housing tip to center of sensing elements. 5. The page 5 and 6 in the appendix is for the measurement which partially overlaps device footprint due to sensor cone exclusion, the 4 cm2^ averaging causes a further reduction of the displayed PD area. Measured Measured 4cm^2 4cm^2 Measured Measured Plot Bandwidth Carrier Antenna Beam Beam Exposure Test Average Average Frequency RB allocation Modulation E peak H peak No. of 1CC aggregation module ID 1 ID 2 Conditions separation Normal Total (V/m) (A/m) PD PD (W/m^2) (W/m^2) 100 MHz 1cc 0 33 157 27.925 Front Surface 2mm 1RB_0 offset QPSK 13.2 0.033 0.068 0.089 100 MHz 1cc 0 49 177 27.925 Front Surface 2mm 1RB_0 offset QPSK 26.8 0.058 0.087 0.115 100 MHz 1cc 0 49 177 27.925 Back Surface 5mm 1RB_0 offset QPSK 97.7 0.254 1.65 2.47 100 MHz 1cc 0 33 157 27.925 Left side 70mm 1RB_0 offset QPSK 45 0.119 4.77 4.78 100 MHz 1cc 0 49 177 27.925 Right Side 5mm 1RB_0 offset QPSK 10.6 0.036 0.089 0.099 100 MHz 1cc 0 31 161 27.925 Right Side 5mm 1RB_0 offset QPSK 11 0.03 0.152 0.166 100 MHz 1cc 0 49 177 27.925 Top side 5mm 1RB_0 offset QPSK 9.55 0.032 0.098 0.112 100 MHz 1cc 0 61 189 27.925 Bottom side 5mm 1RB_0 offset QPSK 15.9 0.052 0.414 0.483 100 MHz 1cc 0 33 157 27.925 Left side 70 mm 32 RB_0 offset QPSK 44.8 0.119 4.78 4.82 01 100 MHz 1cc 0 33 157 27.925 Left side 70 mm 66 RB_0 offset QPSK 45.3 0.12 4.98 4.99 100 MHz 1cc 0 33 157 27.925 Left side 70 mm 66 RB_0 offset 16QAM 40.9 0.108 4.03 4.04 100 MHz 1cc 0 33 157 27.925 Left side 70 mm 66 RB_0 offset 64QAM 33 0.09 2.61 2.64 50MHz 1cc 0 33 157 27.925 Left side 70 mm 32 RB_0 offset QPSK 45 0.119 4.84 4.87 4cc 100 MHz 0 33 157 27.925 Left side 70 mm 66 RB_0 offset QPSK 34 0.09 2.78 2.79 (contiguous) 100 MHz 1cc 0 33 157 27.55 Left side 70 mm 66 RB_0 offset QPSK 45.3 0.119 4.78 4.8 100 MHz 1cc 0 33 157 28.3 Left side 70 mm 66 RB_0 offset QPSK 43.9 0.117 4.74 4.79 Measured Measured 4cm^2 4cm^2 Measured Measured Plot Bandwidth Carrier Antenna Beam Beam Exposure Test Average Average Frequency RB allocation Modulation E peak H peak No. of 1CC aggregation module ID 1 ID 2 Conditions separation Normal Total (V/m) (A/m) PD PD (W/m^2) (W/m^2) 100 MHz 1cc 1 26 153 27.925 Front Surface 2mm 1RB_0 offset QPSK 23.4 0.065 0.24 0.259 100 MHz 1cc 1 26 153 27.925 Back Surface 5mm 1RB_0 offset QPSK 61.4 0.15 0.823 1.13 100 MHz 1cc 1 26 153 27.925 Left side 5mm 1RB_0 offset QPSK 7.56 0.028 0.050 0.055 100 MHz 1cc 1 28 155 27.925 Right Side 70mm 1RB_0 offset QPSK 28.2 0.076 1.86 1.87 100 MHz 1cc 1 44 172 27.925 Top side 5mm 1RB_0 offset QPSK 16.1 0.045 0.477 0.522 100 MHz 1cc 1 28 155 27.925 Right Side 70mm 32 RB_0 offset QPSK 31 0.082 2.18 2.2 100 MHz 1cc 1 28 155 27.925 Right Side 70mm 66 RB_0 offset QPSK 29.8 0.081 2.04 2.05 100 MHz 1cc 1 28 155 27.925 Right Side 70mm 32 RB_0 offset 16QAM 28.1 0.075 1.79 1.8 100 MHz 1cc 1 28 155 27.925 Right Side 70mm 32 RB_0 offset 64QAM 24.9 0.064 1.13 1.14 50MHz 1cc 1 28 155 27.925 Right Side 70mm 16 RB_0 offset QPSK 30.7 0.08 2.14 2.15 4cc 100 MHz 1 28 155 27.925 Right Side 70mm 32 RB_0 offset QPSK 20.1 0.055 0.962 0.966 (contiguous) 02 100 MHz 1cc 1 28 155 27.55 Right Side 70mm 32 RB_0 offset QPSK 32.6 0.088 2.46 2.48 100 MHz 1cc 1 28 155 28.3 Right Side 70mm 32 RB_0 offset QPSK 26 0.071 1.57 1.58 TEL : 886-3-327-3456 Page 23 of 27 FAX : 886-3-328-4978 Issued Date : Feb. 07, 2019 Form version: 180516

RF EXPOSURE EVALUATION REPORT Report No. : FA890514B Measured Measured 4cm^2 4cm^2 Measured Measured Plot Bandwidth Carrier Antenna Beam Beam Exposure Test Average Average Frequency RB allocation Modulation E peak H peak No. of 1CC aggregation module ID 1 ID 2 Conditions separation Normal Total (V/m) (A/m) PD PD (W/m^2) (W/m^2) 100 MHz 1cc 2 59 186 27.925 Front Surface 70mm 1RB_0 offset QPSK 10.8 0.033 0.150 0.157 100 MHz 1cc 2 41 168 27.925 Front Surface 5mm 1RB_0 offset QPSK 25.8 0.057 0.117 0.137 100 MHz 1cc 2 43 167 27.925 Back Surface 5mm 1RB_0 offset QPSK 28.6 0.078 1.27 1.29 100 MHz 1cc 2 42 169 27.925 Left side 5mm 1RB_0 offset QPSK 11.1 0.035 0.141 0.155 100 MHz 1cc 2 56 187 27.925 Right Side 5mm 1RB_0 offset QPSK 36.4 0.097 1.37 1.49 100 MHz 1cc 2 41 168 27.925 Top side 5mm 1RB_0 offset QPSK 54.9 0.147 1.34 1.67 100 MHz 1cc 2 43 167 27.925 Top side 5mm 1RB_0 offset QPSK 56.1 0.141 1.68 1.79 100 MHz 1cc 2 43 167 27.925 Top side 5mm 32 RB_0 offset QPSK 59 0.147 1.73 1.91 100 MHz 1cc 2 43 167 27.925 Top side 5mm 66 RB_0 offset QPSK 57.7 0.146 1.64 1.84 100 MHz 1cc 2 43 167 27.925 Top side 5mm 32 RB_0 offset 16QAM 53.5 0.136 1.44 1.61 100 MHz 1cc 2 43 167 27.925 Top side 5mm 32 RB_0 offset 64QAM 43.2 0.112 1.01 1.11 50MHz 1cc 2 43 167 27.925 Top side 5mm 16 RB_0 offset QPSK 62.5 0.155 1.85 2.07 4cc 100 MHz 2 43 167 27.925 Top side 5mm 32 RB_0 offset QPSK 46.1 0.12 1.12 1.19 (contiguous) 03 100 MHz 1cc 2 43 167 27.55 Top side 5mm 32 RB_0 offset QPSK 70.2 0.173 2.5 2.75 100 MHz 1cc 2 43 167 28.3 Top side 5mm 32 RB_0 offset QPSK 50.8 0.128 1.25 1.42 Measured Measured 4cm^2 4cm^2 Measured Measured Plot Bandwidth Carrier Antenna Beam Beam Exposure Test Average Average Frequency RB allocation Modulation E peak H peak No. of 1CC aggregation module ID 1 ID 2 Conditions separation Normal Total (V/m) (A/m) PD PD (W/m^2) (W/m^2) 100 MHz 1cc 3 36 164 27.925 Front Surface 2 mm 1RB_0 offset QPSK 17.3 0.048 0.319 0.385 100 MHz 1cc 3 62 190 27.925 Back Surface 70 mm 1RB_0 offset QPSK 14.9 0.052 0.380 0.408 100 MHz 1cc 3 52 180 27.925 Back Surface 70 mm 1RB_0 offset QPSK 21.2 0.057 0.896 0.916 100 MHz 1cc 3 35 163 27.925 Back Surface 70 mm 1RB_0 offset QPSK 20.5 0.055 0.824 0.850 100 MHz 1cc 3 54 182 27.925 Left side 5 mm 1RB_0 offset QPSK 21.8 0.059 0.880 0.896 100 MHz 1cc 3 53 181 27.925 Left side 5 mm 1RB_0 offset QPSK 19.5 0.055 0.510 0.674 100 MHz 1cc 3 54 182 27.925 Right Side 5mm 1RB_0 offset QPSK 18 0.058 0.638 0.674 100 MHz 1cc 3 38 165 27.925 Right Side 5mm 1RB_0 offset QPSK 19.1 0.056 0.799 0.823 100 MHz 1cc 3 62 190 27.925 Top side 5mm 1RB_0 offset QPSK 40.9 0.107 1.93 2.02 100 MHz 1cc 3 34 162 27.925 Top side 5mm 1RB_0 offset QPSK 42 0.113 1.95 2.17 100 MHz 1cc 3 37 166 27.925 Top side 5mm 1RB_0 offset QPSK 41.3 0.116 2.99 3.23 100 MHz 1cc 3 37 166 27.925 Top side 5mm 32 RB_0 offset QPSK 43.9 0.118 3.66 3.99 100 MHz 1cc 3 37 166 27.925 Top side 5mm 66 RB_0 offset QPSK 43.1 0.116 3.64 3.9 100 MHz 1cc 3 37 166 27.925 Top side 5mm 32 RB_0 offset 16QAM 39.5 0.103 2.99 3.23 100 MHz 1cc 3 37 166 27.925 Top side 5mm 32 RB_0 offset 64QAM 32.3 0.09 1.98 2.11 04 50MHz 1cc 3 37 166 27.925 Top side 5mm 16 RB_0 offset QPSK 46 0.119 3.68 4.05 4cc 100 MHz 3 37 166 27.925 Top side 5mm 32 RB_0 offset QPSK 38.5 0.108 1.61 1.81 (contiguous) 100 MHz 1cc 3 37 166 27.55 Top side 5mm 32 RB_0 offset QPSK 41.4 0.121 1.93 2.42 100 MHz 1cc 3 37 166 28.3 Top side 5mm 32 RB_0 offset QPSK 39.7 0.1 2.35 2.63 TEL : 886-3-327-3456 Page 24 of 27 FAX : 886-3-328-4978 Issued Date : Feb. 07, 2019 Form version: 180516

seortrow cas. _RF EXPOSURE EVALUATION REPORT Report No. : FA890514B 14. Simultaneous Transmission Analysis Mod WWAN LTE Bands+5GNR n261 yes Phone WLAN 2.4GHz/5GHz+Mod LTE Bands + 5GNR n261 yes Phone WWAN LTE bands+ phone WLAN 2.4GHz/S5GHz+ Mod LTE Bands + SGNR n261 yes Phone WWAN CDMA bands+ phone WLAN 2.4GHz/5GHz+ Mod LTE Bands + 5GNR n261 yes General Note: 1. The WWAN / WLAN and Bluetooth SAR test results were referring the report of FCC ID: IHDTSGXL1 (Sporton SAR Report No. FA890514), and phone report of FCC ID: IHDTSGXJ1 (Sporton SAR Report No. FA851503). 2. Considering 5G NR n261 with WWAN / WLAN and Bluetooth can transmit simultaneously, the basic restrictions are on SAR and power density, and summation of these quantities should follow below formula and the simultaneous transmission analysis was following below step and the detail analysis refer to appendix D: i) Use the standalone SAR according original report to collocate with 5G NR n261 power density at each exposure positions, if the result < 1, additional analysis is not necessary. ii) If this ratio is larger than 1, use surface single point SAR measurements and treat as 1—gram measurements with 1.6 W/kg as the limit. Use these measurementfor the point by point summation and contirm the ratio summation does not exceed 1 10 GHz 300 GHz 8. y SAB;; _ y¥ Sg i=100 khz ©48 is i0 onz S Test Engineer : Aaron Chen, Tom Jiang, Thomas Wang, Kurt Liu and Nick Yu TEL : 886—3—327—3456 Page 25 of 27 FAX : 886—3—328—4978 Issued Date : Feb. 07, 2019 Form version: 180516

seortrow cas. _RF EXPOSURE EVALUATION REPORT Report No. : FA890514B 15. Uncertainty Assessment The budgetis valid for evaluation distances > A/21. For specific tests and configurations, the Uncertainty could be considerably smaller. Probe Calibration I|1|1|1|1|1|1|z|1|m|m|m|z 8 Hemispherical Isotropy 8| Linearity 8| System Detection Limits 8]}8]} Modulation Response Readout Electronics 8|81 Response Time Integration Time 81818181 RF Ambient Noise RF Ambient Reflections Probe Positioner Probe Positioning 818| Savg Reconstruction Power Drift Input Power TEL : 886—3—327—3456 Page 26 of 27 FAX : 886—3—328—4978 Issued Date : Feb. 07, 2019 Form version: 180516

RF EXPOSURE EVALUATION REPORT Report No. : FA890514B 16. References [1] FCC 47 CFR Part 2 “Frequency Allocations and Radio Treaty Matters; General Rules and Regulations” [2] FCC KDB 447498 D01 v06, “Mobile and Portable Device RF Exposure Procedures and Equipment Authorization Policies”, Oct 2015 [3] FCC KDB 865664 D02 v01r02, “RF Exposure Compliance Reporting and Documentation Considerations” Oct 2015. [4] FCC KDB 648474 D04 v01r03, “SAR Evaluation Considerations for Wireless Handsets”, Oct 2015. TEL : 886-3-327-3456 Page 27 of 27 FAX : 886-3-328-4978 Issued Date : Feb. 07, 2019 Form version: 180516

RF EXPOSURE EVALUATION REPORT Report No. : FA890514B Appendix A. Plots of System Performance Check The plots are shown as follows. TEL : 886-3-327-3456 Page : A1 of A1 FAX : 886-3-328-4978 Issued Date : Feb. 07, 2019 Form version: 180516

RF EXPOSURE EVALUATION REPORT Report No. : FA890514B Appendix B. Plots of SAR Measurement The plots are shown as follows. TEL : 886-3-327-3456 Page : B1 of B1 FAX : 886-3-328-4978 Issued Date : Feb. 07, 2019 Form version: 180516

RF EXPOSURE EVALUATION REPORT Report No. : FA890514B Appendix C. DASY Calibration Certificate The DASY calibration certificates are shown as follows. TEL : 886-3-327-3456 Page : C1 of C1 FAX : 886-3-328-4978 Issued Date : Feb. 07, 2019 Form version: 180516


Document Created: 2019-02-15 03:52:52
Document Modified: 2019-02-15 03:52:52
© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC