SAR Report Part 4

FCC ID: I28MD-ZLAN11G

RF Exposure Info

Download: PDF
FCCID_708577

Zebra Technologies Corp. MODEL: MZ220 APPENDIX E - EUT SCANS Test Laboratory: Bay Area Compliance Lab Corp. (BACL) Low channel, EUT back touching flat phantom with belt clip DUT Type: MZ220; Sample; Serial: XXMZ06-08-5104 Communication System: 802.11g; Frequency: 2412 MHz; Duty Cycle: 1:1 Medium parameters used: f = 2412 MHz; σ = 1.96 mho/m; εr = 52.8; ρ = 1000 kg/m3 Phantom section: Flat Section DASY4 Configuration: • Probe: ET3DV6 - SN1604; ConvF(4.27, 4.27, 4.27); Calibrated: 5/2/2006 • Sensor-Surface: 4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection) • Electronics: DAE3 Sn456; Calibrated: 10/18/2005 • Phantom: SAM with CRP; Type: Twin SAM; Serial: TP-1032 • Measurement SW: DASY4, V4.6 Build 23; Postprocessing SW: SEMCAD, V1.8 Build 161 EUT back touching to flat phantom with belt clip/ Area Scan (81x101x1): Measurement grid: dx=15mm, dy=15mm Maximum value of SAR (interpolated) = 0.041 mW/g EUT back touching to flat phantom with belt clip/ Zoom Scan (7x7x7)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=5mm, dy=5mm, dz=5mm Reference Value = 3.19 V/m; Power Drift = -0.03 dB Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 0.044 W/kg SAR(1 g) = 0.025 mW/g; SAR(10 g) = 0.014 mW/g Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 0.039 mW/g 0 dB = 0.039mW/g Plot #1 Report #:R0608282S MZ220 Page 46 of 57 SAR Evaluation Report

Zebra Technologies Corp. MODEL: MZ220 Test Laboratory: Bay Area Compliance Lab Corp. (BACL) Low channel, EUT perpendicular to the flat phantom DUT Type: MZ220; Serial: XXMZ06-08-5104 Communication System: 802.11g; Frequency: 2412 MHz; Duty Cycle: 1:1 Medium parameters used: f = 2412 MHz; σ = 1.96 mho/m; εr = 52.8; ρ = 1000 kg/m3 Phantom section: Flat Section DASY4 Configuration: • Probe: ET3DV6 - SN1604; ConvF(4.27, 4.27, 4.27); Calibrated: 5/2/2006 • Sensor-Surface: 4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection) • Electronics: DAE3 Sn456; Calibrated: 10/18/2005 • Phantom: SAM with CRP; Type: Twin SAM; Serial: TP-1032 • Measurement SW: DASY4, V4.6 Build 23; Postprocessing SW: SEMCAD, V1.8 Build 161 EUT perpendicular to flat phantom/Area Scan (81x101x1): Measurement grid: dx=15mm, dy=15mm Maximum value of SAR (interpolated) = 0.043 mW/g EUT perpendicular to flat phantom/Zoom Scan (7x7x7)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=5mm, dy=5mm, dz=5mm Reference Value = 4.71 V/m; Power Drift = -0.092 dB Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 0.068 W/kg SAR(1 g) = 0.049 mW/g; SAR(10 g) = 0.035 mW/g Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 0.066 mW/g 0 dB = 0.066mW/g Plot #2 Report #:R0608282S MZ220 Page 47 of 57 SAR Evaluation Report

Zebra Technologies Corp. MODEL: MZ220 Test Laboratory: Bay Area Compliance Lab Corp. (BACL) Middle channel, EUT perpendicular to the flat phantom DUT Type: MZ220; Serial: XXMZ06-08-5104 Communication System: 802.11g; Frequency: 2442 MHz; Duty Cycle: 1:1 Medium parameters used: f = 2442 MHz; σ = 1.96 mho/m; εr = 52.8; ρ = 1000 kg/m3 Phantom section: Flat Section DASY4 Configuration: • Probe: ET3DV6 - SN1604; ConvF(4.27, 4.27, 4.27); Calibrated: 5/2/2006 • Sensor-Surface: 4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection) • Electronics: DAE3 Sn456; Calibrated: 10/18/2005 • Phantom: SAM with CRP; Type: Twin SAM; Serial: TP-1032 • Measurement SW: DASY4, V4.6 Build 23; Postprocessing SW: SEMCAD, V1.8 Build 161 EUT perpendicular to flat phantom/Area Scan (81x101x1): Measurement grid: dx=15mm, dy=15mm Maximum value of SAR (interpolated) = 0.019 mW/g EUT perpendicular to flat phantom/Zoom Scan (7x7x7)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=5mm, dy=5mm, dz=5mm Reference Value = 3.19 V/m; Power Drift = -0.04 dB Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 0.074 W/kg SAR(1 g) = 0.017 mW/g; SAR(10 g) = 0.011 mW/g Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 0.027 mW/g 0 dB = 0.027mW/g Plot #3 Report #:R0608282S MZ220 Page 48 of 57 SAR Evaluation Report

Zebra Technologies Corp. MODEL: MZ220 Test Laboratory: Bay Area Compliance Lab Corp. (BACL) High channel, EUT perpendicular to the flat phantom DUT Type: MZ220; Serial: XXMZ06-08-5104 Communication System: 802.11g; Frequency: 2462 MHz; Duty Cycle: 1:1 Medium parameters used (interpolated): f = 2462 MHz; σ = 1.96 mho/m; εr = 52.8; ρ = 1000 kg/m3 Phantom section: Flat Section DASY4 Configuration: • Probe: ET3DV6 - SN1604; ConvF(4.27, 4.27, 4.27); Calibrated: 5/2/2006 • Sensor-Surface: 4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection) • Electronics: DAE3 Sn456; Calibrated: 10/18/2005 • Phantom: SAM with CRP; Type: Twin SAM; Serial: TP-1032 • Measurement SW: DASY4, V4.6 Build 23; Postprocessing SW: SEMCAD, V1.8 Build 161 EUT perpendicular to flat phantom/Area Scan (81x101x1): Measurement grid: dx=15mm, dy=15mm Maximum value of SAR (interpolated) = 0.060 mW/g EUT perpendicular to flat phantom/Zoom Scan (7x7x7)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=5mm, dy=5mm, dz=5mm Reference Value = 3.92 V/m; Power Drift = -0.06 dB Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 0.068 W/kg SAR(1 g) = 0.027 mW/g; SAR(10 g) = 0.020 mW/g Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 0.053 mW/g 0 dB = 0.053mW/g Plot #4 Report #:R0608282S MZ220 Page 49 of 57 SAR Evaluation Report

Zebra Technologies Corp. MODEL: MZ220 Test Laboratory: Bay Area Compliance Lab Corp. (BACL) Low channel, EUT back touching to the flat phantom with belt clip DUT Type: MZ220; Sample; Serial: XXMZ06-08-5104 Communication System: 802.11b; Frequency: 2412 MHz; Duty Cycle: 1:1 Medium parameters used: f = 2412 MHz; σ = 1.96 mho/m; εr = 52.8; ρ = 1000 kg/m3 Phantom section: Flat Section DASY4 Configuration: • Probe: ET3DV6 - SN1604; ConvF(4.27, 4.27, 4.27); Calibrated: 5/2/2006 • Sensor-Surface: 4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection) • Electronics: DAE3 Sn456; Calibrated: 10/18/2005 • Phantom: SAM with CRP; Type: Twin SAM; Serial: TP-1032 • Measurement SW: DASY4, V4.6 Build 23; Postprocessing SW: SEMCAD, V1.8 Build 161 EUT back touching to the flat phantom/Area Scan (81x101x1): Measurement grid: dx=15mm, dy=15mm Maximum value of SAR (interpolated) = 0.030 mW/g EUT back touching to the flat phantom/Zoom Scan (7x7x7)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=5mm, dy=5mm, dz=5mm Reference Value = 1.42 V/m; Power Drift = -0.08 dB Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 0.033 W/kg SAR(1 g) = 0.027 mW/g; SAR(10 g) = 0.011 mW/g Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 0.029 mW/g 0 dB = 0.029 mW/g Plot#5 Report #:R0608282S MZ220 Page 50 of 57 SAR Evaluation Report

Zebra Technologies Corp. MODEL: MZ220 Test Laboratory: Bay Area Compliance Lab Corp. (BACL) Low channel, EUT perpendicular to the flat phantom DUT Type: MZ220; Sample; Serial: XXMZ06-08-5104 Communication System: 802.11b; Frequency: 2412 MHz; Duty Cycle: 1:1 Medium parameters used: f = 2412 MHz; σ = 1.96mho/m; εr = 52.8; ρ = 1000 kg/m3 Phantom section: Flat Section DASY4 Configuration: • Probe: ET3DV6 - SN1604; ConvF(4.27, 4.27, 4.27); Calibrated: 5/2/2006 • Sensor-Surface: 4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection) • Electronics: DAE3 Sn456; Calibrated: 10/18/2005 • Phantom: SAM with CRP; Type: Twin SAM; Serial: TP-1032 • Measurement SW: DASY4, V4.6 Build 23; Postprocessing SW: SEMCAD, V1.8 Build 161 EUT perpendicular to flat phantom/Area Scan (81x101x1): Measurement grid: dx=15mm, dy=15mm Maximum value of SAR (interpolated) = 0.037 mW/g EUT perpendicular to flat phantom/Zoom Scan (7x7x7)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=5mm, dy=5mm, dz=5mm Reference Value = 1.66 V/m; Power Drift = -0.043 dB Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 0.031 W/kg SAR(1 g) = 0.036 mW/g; SAR(10 g) = 0.018 mW/g Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 0.038 mW/g 0 dB = 0.038mW/g Plot#6 Report #:R0608282S MZ220 Page 51 of 57 SAR Evaluation Report

Zebra Technologies Corp. MODEL: MZ220 Test Laboratory: Bay Area Compliance Lab Corp. (BACL) Middle channel, EUT perpendicular to the flat phantom DUT Type: MZ220; Sample; Serial: XXMZ06-08-5104 Communication System: 802.11b; Frequency: 2442 MHz; Duty Cycle: 1:1 Medium parameters used (interpolated): f = 2442 MHz; σ = 1.96 mho/m; εr = 52.8; ρ = 1000 kg/m3 Phantom section: Flat Section DASY4 Configuration: • Probe: ET3DV6 - SN1604; ConvF(4.27, 4.27, 4.27); Calibrated: 5/2/2006 • Sensor-Surface: 4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection) • Electronics: DAE3 Sn456; Calibrated: 10/18/2005 • Phantom: SAM with CRP; Type: Twin SAM; Serial: TP-1032 • Measurement SW: DASY4, V4.6 Build 23; Postprocessing SW: SEMCAD, V1.8 Build 161 EUT perpendicular to flat phantom/Area Scan (81x101x1): Measurement grid: dx=15mm, dy=15mm Maximum value of SAR (interpolated) = 0.028 mW/g EUT perpendicular to flat phantom/Zoom Scan (7x7x7)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=5mm, dy=5mm, dz=5mm Reference Value = 1.87 V/m; Power Drift = -0.047 dB Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 0.029 W/kg SAR(1 g) = 0.032 mW/g; SAR(10 g) = 0.015 mW/g Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 0.025 mW/g 0 dB = 0.025mW/g Plot#7 Report #:R0608282S MZ220 Page 52 of 57 SAR Evaluation Report

Zebra Technologies Corp. MODEL: MZ220 Test Laboratory: Bay Area Compliance Lab Corp. (BACL) High channel, EUT perpendicular to the flat phantom DUT Type: MZ220; Sample; Serial: XXMZ06-08-5104 Communication System: 802.11b; Frequency: 2462 MHz;Duty Cycle: 1:1 Medium parameters used: f = 2462 MHz; σ = 1.96 mho/m; εr = 52.8; ρ = 1000 kg/m3 Phantom section: Flat Section DASY4 Configuration: • Probe: ET3DV6 - SN1604; ConvF(4.27, 4.27, 4.27); Calibrated: 5/2/2006 • Sensor-Surface: 4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection) • Electronics: DAE3 Sn456; Calibrated: 10/18/2005 • Phantom: SAM with CRP; Type: Twin SAM; Serial: TP-1032 • Measurement SW: DASY4, V4.6 Build 23; Postprocessing SW: SEMCAD, V1.8 Build 161 EUT perpendicular to flat phantom/Area Scan (81x101x1): Measurement grid: dx=15mm, dy=15mm Maximum value of SAR (interpolated) = 0.031 mW/g EUT perpendicular to flat phantom/Zoom Scan (7x7x7)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=5mm, dy=5mm, dz=5mm Reference Value = 1.45 V/m; Power Drift = 0.015 dB Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 0.026 W/kg SAR(1 g) = 0.024 mW/g; SAR(10 g) = 0.014 mW/g Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 0.026 mW/g 0 dB = 0.026mW/g Plot#8 Report #:R0608282S MZ220 Page 53 of 57 SAR Evaluation Report

Zebra Technologies Corp. MODEL: MZ220 APPENDIX F – CONDUCTED OUTPUT POWER MEASUREMENT Provision Applicable The measured peak output power should be greater and within 5% than EMI measurement. Test Procedure The RF output of the transmitter was connected to the input of the spectrum analyzer through sufficient attenuation. Test equipment Agilent 8565EC Spectrum Analyzer, Calibration Due Date: 2007-01-11 Test Results 802.11g conducted output power Frequency (MHz) Output Power in dBm Output Power in mw 2412 15.0 31.6 2442 15.0 31.6 2472 14.9 30.9 802.11b conducted output power Frequency (MHz) Output Power in dBm Output Power in mw 2412 18.8 75.9 2442 18.4 69.2 2472 18.6 72.4 Report #:R0608282S MZ220 Page 54 of 57 SAR Evaluation Report

Zebra Technologies Corp. MODEL: MZ220 APPENDIX H – EUT TEST POSITION PHOTOS Model MZ220 perpendicular to the flat phantom Model MZ220 back touching to the flat phantom with belt clip Report #:R0608282S MZ220 Page 55 of 57 SAR Evaluation Report

Zebra Technologies Corp. MODEL: MZ220 APPENDIX I – EUT & ACCESSORIES PHOTOS EUT – Front View EUT – Rear View Report #:R0608282S MZ220 Page 56 of 57 SAR Evaluation Report

Zebra Technologies Corp. MODEL: MZ220 APPENDIX J - INFORMATIVE REFERENCES [1] Federal Communications Commission, \Report and order: Guidelines for evaluating the environmental effects of radiofrequency radiation", Tech. Rep. FCC 96-326, FCC, Washington, D.C. 20554, 1996. [2] David L. Means Kwok Chan, Robert F. Cleveland, \Evaluating compliance with FCC guidelines for human exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields", Tech. Rep., Federal Communication Commission, O_ce of Engineering & Technology, Washington, DC, 1997. [3] Thomas Schmid, Oliver Egger, and Niels Kuster, \Automated E-_eld scanning system for dosimetric assessments", IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 44, pp. 105{113, Jan. 1996. [4] Niels Kuster, Ralph K.astle, and Thomas Schmid, \Dosimetric evaluation of mobile communications equipment with known precision", IEICE Transactions on Communications, vol. E80-B, no. 5, pp. 645{652, May 1997. [5] CENELEC, \Considerations for evaluating of human exposure to electromagnetic fields (EMFs) from mobile telecommunication equipment (MTE) in the frequency range 30MHz - 6GHz", Tech. Rep., CENELEC, European Committee for Electrotechnical Standardization, Brussels, 1997. [6] ANSI, ANSI/IEEE C95.1-1992: IEEE Standard for Safety Levels with Respect to Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields, 3 kHz to 300 GHz, The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc., New York, NY 10017, 1992. [7] Katja Pokovic, Thomas Schmid, and Niels Kuster, \Robust setup for precise calibration of E-field probes in tissue simulating liquids at mobile communications frequencies", in ICECOM _ 97, Dubrovnik, October 15{17, 1997, pp. 120-24. [8] Katja Pokovic, Thomas Schmid, and Niels Kuster, \E-field probe with improved isotropy in brain simulating liquids", in Proceedings of the ELMAR, Zadar, Croatia, 23{25 June, 1996, pp. 172-175. [9] Volker Hombach, Klaus Meier, Michael Burkhardt, Eberhard K. uhn, and Niels Kuster, \The depen-dence of EM energy absorption upon human head modeling at 900 MHz", IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 44, no. 10, pp. 1865-1873, Oct. 1996. [10] Klaus Meier, Ralf Kastle, Volker Hombach, Roger Tay, and Niels Kuster, \The dependence of EM energy absorption upon human head modeling at 1800 MHz", IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, Oct. 1997, in press. [11] W. Gander, Computermathematik, Birkhaeuser, Basel, 1992. [12] W. H. Press, S. A. Teukolsky,W. T. Vetterling, and B. P. Flannery, Numerical Recepies in C, The Art of Scientific Computing, Second Edition, Cambridge University Press, 1992.Dosimetric Evaluation of Sample device, month 1998 9 [13] NIS81 NAMAS, \The treatment of uncertainity in EMC measurement", Tech. Rep., NAMAS Executive, National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, Middlesex, England, 1994. [14] Barry N. Taylor and Christ E. Kuyatt, \Guidelines for evaluating and expressing the uncertainty of NIST measurement results", Tech. Rep., National Institute of Standards and Technology, 1994. Dosimetric Evaluation of Sample device, month 1998 10. Report #:R0608282S MZ220 Page 57 of 57 SAR Evaluation Report


Document Created: 2006-09-25 10:48:26
Document Modified: 2006-09-25 10:48:26
© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC