Test Report DSC

FCC ID: GQ4-70T

Test Report

Download: PDF
FCCID_2201538

Date of Issue: February 24, 2014 Prepared For: TRW Automotive Test Report No.: 417124-667 The University of Michigan Radiation Laboratory 3228 EECS Building Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-2122 USA Tel: (734) 483-4211 Fax: (734) 647-2106 e-mail: liepa@umich.edu Testing of Electromagnetic Emissions per USA: CFR Title 47, Part 15.231(e) Canada: IC RSS-210/GENe are herein reported for TRW Automotive 231008, 231674 Test Report No.: 417124-667 Copyright c 2014 Applicant/Provider: TRW Automotive 24175 Research Drive, Farmington Hills Michigan 4835-2642 USA Phone: +1 (248) 699-4487, Fax: +1 (248) 699-4241 Contact Person: Mark Baker; mark.baker@trw.com Report by: Report Date of Issue: February 24, 2014 Dr. Valdis V. Liepa Results of testing completed on (or before) February 24, 2014 are as follows. Emissions: The transmitter intentional emissions COMPLY with the regulatory limit(s) by no less than 6.5 dB. Transmit chain spurious harmonic emissions COMPLY by no less than 4.2 dB. The University of Michigan Radiation Laboratory, 3228 EECS Building, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-2122 USA Page 1 of 13

Date of Issue: February 24, 2014 Prepared For: TRW Automotive Test Report No.: 417124-667 Contents 1 Test Specifications, General Procedures, and Location 3 1.1 Test Specification and General Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 1.2 Test Location and Equipment Used . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 2 Configuration and Identification of the Equipment Under Test 5 2.1 Description and Declarations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 2.1.1 EUT Configuration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 2.1.2 Modes of Operation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 2.1.3 Variants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 2.1.4 Test Samples . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 2.1.5 Functional Exerciser . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 2.1.6 Modifications Made . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 2.1.7 Production Intent . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 2.1.8 Declared Exemptions and Additional Product Notes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 3 Emissions 7 3.1 General Test Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 3.1.1 Radiated Test Setup and Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 3.1.2 Conducted Emissions Test Setup and Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 3.1.3 Power Supply Variation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 3.2 Intentional Emissions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 3.2.1 Fundamental Emission Pulsed Operation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 3.2.2 Fundamental Emission Bandwidth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 3.2.3 Fundamental Emission . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 3.3 Unintentional Emissions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 3.3.1 Transmit Chain Spurious Emissions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 List of Tables 1 The University of Michigan Radiation Laboratory Equipment List. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 2 EUT Declarations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 3 Pulsed Emission Characteristics (Duty Cycle). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 4 Intentional Emission Bandwidth. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 5 Fundamental Radiated Emissions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 6 Transmit Chain Spurious Emissions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 List of Figures 1 Photos of EUT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 2 EUT Test Configuration Diagram. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 3 Radiated Emissions Diagram of the EUT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 4 Radiated Emissions Test Setup Photograph(s). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 5 Pulsed Emission Characteristics (Duty Cycle). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 5 Pulsed Emission Characteristics (Duty Cycle). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 6 Intentional Emission Bandwidth. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 The University of Michigan Radiation Laboratory, 3228 EECS Building, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-2122 USA Page 2 of 13

Date of Issue: February 24, 2014 Prepared For: TRW Automotive Test Report No.: 417124-667 1 Test Specifications, General Procedures, and Location 1.1 Test Specification and General Procedures The ultimate goal of TRW Automotive is to demonstrate that the Equipment Under Test (EUT) complies with the Rules and/or Directives below. Detailed in this report are the results of testing the TRW Automotive 231008, 231674 for compliance to: Country/Region Rules or Directive Referenced Section(s) United States Code of Federal Regulations CFR Title 47, Part 15.231(e) Canada Industry Canada IC RSS-210/GENe In association with the rules and directives outlined above, the following specifications and procedures are fol- lowed herein. ”Methods of Measurement of Radio-Noise Emissions from Low-Voltage Electri- ANSI C63.4-2003 cal and Electronic Equipment in the Range of 9 kHz to 40 GHz” Industry Canada ”The Measurement of Occupied Bandwidth” The University of Michigan Radiation Laboratory, 3228 EECS Building, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-2122 USA Page 3 of 13

Date of Issue: February 24, 2014 Prepared For: TRW Automotive Test Report No.: 417124-667 1.2 Test Location and Equipment Used Test Location The EUT was fully tested by The University of Michigan Radiation Laboratory, 3228 EECS Building, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-2122 USA. The Test Facility description and attenuation characteristics are on file with the FCC Laboratory, Columbia, Maryland (FCC Reg. No: 91050) and with Industry Canada, Ottawa, ON (File Ref. No: IC 2057A-1). Test Equipment Pertinent test equipment used for measurements at this facility is listed in Table 1. The quality system employed at The University of Michigan Radiation Laboratory has been established to ensure all equipment has a clearly identifiable classification, calibration expiry date, and that all calibrations are traceable to the SI through NIST, other recognized national laboratories, accepted fundamental or natural physical constants, ratio type of calibration, or by comparison to consensus standards. Table 1: The University of Michigan Radiation Laboratory Equipment List. Test Instrument Manufacturer/Model Q Number Spectrum Analyzer (9kHz-26GHz) Hewlett-Packard 8593E, SN: 3412A01131 HP8593E1 Spectrum Analyzer (9kHz-6.5GHz) Hewlett-Packard 8595E, SN: 3543A01546 JDB8595E Power Meter Hewlett-Packard, 432A HP432A1 Harmonic Mixer (26-40 GHz) Hewlett-Packard 11970A, SN: 3003A08327 HP11970A1 Harmonic Mixer (40-60 GHz) Hewlett-Packard 11970U, SN: 2332A00500 HP11970U1 Harmonic Mixer (75-110 GHz) Hewlett-Packard 11970W, SN: 2521A00179 HP11970W1 Harmonic Mixer (140-220 GHz) Pacific Millimeter Prod., GMA, SN: 26 PMPGMA1 S-Band Std. Gain Horn S/A, Model SGH-2.6 SBAND1 C-Band Std. Gain Horn University of Michigan, NRL design CBAND1 XN-Band Std. Gain Horn University of Michigan, NRL design XNBAND1 X-Band Std. Gain Horn S/A, Model 12-8.2 XBAND1 X-band horn (8.2- 12.4 GHz) Narda 640 XBAND2 X-band horn (8.2- 12.4 GHz) Scientific Atlanta , 12-8.2, SN: 730 XBAND3 K-band horn (18-26.5 GHz) FXR, Inc., K638KF KBAND1 Ka-band horn (26.5-40 GHz) FXR, Inc., U638A KABAND1 U-band horn (40-60 GHz) Custom Microwave, HO19 UBAND1 W-band horn(75-110 GHz) Custom Microwave, HO10 WBAND1 G-band horn (140-220 GHz) Custom Microwave, HO5R GBAND1 Bicone Antenna (30-250 MHz) University of Michigan, RLBC-1 LBBIC1 Bicone Antenna (200-1000 MHz) University of Michigan, RLBC-2 HBBIC1 Dipole Antenna Set (30-1000 MHz) University of Michigan, RLDP-1,-2,-3 UMDIP1 Dipole Antenna Set (30-1000 MHz) EMCO 3121C, SN: 992 (Ref. Antennas) EMDIP1 Active Rod Antenna (30 Hz-50 MHz) EMCO 3301B, SN: 3223 EMROD1 Active Loop Antenna (30 Hz-50 MHz) EMCO 6502, SN:2855 EMLOOP1 Ridge-horn Antenna (300-5000 MHz) University of Michigan UMRH1 Amplifier (5-1000 MHz) Avantek, A11-1, A25-1S AVAMP1 Amplifier (5-4500 MHz) Avantek AVAMP2 Amplifier (4.5-13 GHz) Avantek, AFT-12665 AVAMP3 Amplifier (6-16 GHz) Trek TRAMP1 Amplifier (16-26 GHz) Avantek AVAMP4 LISN Box University of Michigan UMLISN1 Signal Generator Hewlett-Packard 8657B HPSG1 The University of Michigan Radiation Laboratory, 3228 EECS Building, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-2122 USA Page 4 of 13

Date of Issue: February 24, 2014 Prepared For: TRW Automotive Test Report No.: 417124-667 2 Configuration and Identification of the Equipment Under Test 2.1 Description and Declarations The equipment under test is an automotive Tire Pressure Measurement (TPM) transmitter. The EUT is approxi- mately 5 x 6 x 1 cm (approx.) in dimension, and is depicted in Figure 1. It is powered by a 3 VDC Lithium cell battery. In use, this device is permanently affixed inside the tire of a motor vehicle. Table 2 outlines provider declared EUT specifications. Figure 1: Photos of EUT. 2.1.1 EUT Configuration The EUT is configured for testing as depicted in Figure 2. 2.1.2 Modes of Operation The DUT periodically transmits tire pressure data when in motion. The device is also capable of being automati- cally/manually actuated via LF interrogation during servicing (LEARN mode). 2.1.3 Variants There are two variants of the DUT. Part number 231008 employs a short 20 degree angled stem on the chassis, 231674 employs a longer 54 degree valve stem to use on a different style rim. Both variants are electrically identical. The University of Michigan Radiation Laboratory, 3228 EECS Building, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-2122 USA Page 5 of 13

Date of Issue: February 24, 2014 Prepared For: TRW Automotive Test Report No.: 417124-667 Table 2: EUT Declarations. General Declarations Equipment Type: TPM Transmitter Country of Origin: USA Nominal Supply: 3 VDC Oper. Temp Range: Not Declared Frequency Range: 433.92 MHz Antenna Dimension: as pictured Antenna Type: metal loop Antenna Gain: -30 dBi (approx) Number of Channels: 1 Channel Spacing: Not Applicable Alignment Range: Not Declared Type of Modulation: ASK and FSK United States FCC ID Number: GQ4-70T Classification: DSC Canada Remote Control Device, Ve- IC Number: 1470A-51T Classification: hicular Device EUT TRW, Inc. TPMS Transmitter Type Designator: 231008, 231674 Figure 2: EUT Test Configuration Diagram. 2.1.4 Test Samples Five samples in total were provided. Two samples programmed for CW transmission (one of each stem length), one normal operating sample capable of manually activated transmissions via LF interrogation and periodic transmission when shaken, and two samples (one of each stem length) un-sealed for photographs. 2.1.5 Functional Exerciser Normal operating EUT functionality was verified by observation of transmitted signal. 2.1.6 Modifications Made There were no modifications made to the EUT by this laboratory. 2.1.7 Production Intent The EUT appears to be a production ready sample. 2.1.8 Declared Exemptions and Additional Product Notes The EUT is permanently installed in a transportation vehicle. As such, digital emissions are exempt from US and Canadian digital emissions regulations (per FCC 15.103(a) and IC correspondence on ICES-003). The EUT also employs some modes of operation that alert the vehicle user of sudden changes in tire pressure or temperature. Such alert modes fall under FCC 15.231(a)(4), and may operate during the pendency of the alarm condition. A detailed list of all operating modes is included in the Description of Operation exhibit included in this application. The University of Michigan Radiation Laboratory, 3228 EECS Building, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-2122 USA Page 6 of 13

Date of Issue: February 24, 2014 Prepared For: TRW Automotive Test Report No.: 417124-667 3 Emissions 3.1 General Test Procedures 3.1.1 Radiated Test Setup and Procedures Radiated electromagnetic emissions from the EUT are first evaluated in our shielded fully anechoic chamber. Spec- trum and modulation characteristics of all emissions are recorded, and emissions above 1 GHz are fully characterized. The anechoic chamber contains a set-up similar to that of our outdoor 3-meter site, with a turntable and antenna mast. Instrumentation, including spectrum analyzers and other test equipment as detailed in Section 1.2 are em- ployed. After indoor pre-scans, emission measurements are made on our outdoor 3-meter Open Area Test Site (OATS). If the EUT connects to auxiliary equipment and is table or floor standing, the configurations prescribed in ANSI C63.4 / CISPR-22 are followed. Alternatively, a layout closest to normal use (as declared by the provider) is employed if the resulting emissions appear to be worst-case in such a configuration. See Figure 3. All Long Interface Cables EUT Power Long Interface Cables (to AUX) AUX Power (to EUT) Equipment Under Test Auxiliary (EUT) Short Interface Cables Equipment (AUX) Radiated Emissions Table Figure 3: Radiated Emissions Diagram of the EUT. intentionally radiating elements are placed on the test table lying flat, on their side, and on their end (3-axes) and the resulting worst case emissions are recorded. For both horizontal and vertical polarizations, the test antenna is raised and lowered from 1 to 4 m in height until a maximum emission level is detected. The EUT is then rotated through 360o in azimuth until the highest emission is detected. The test antenna is then raised and lowered one last time from 1 to 4 m and the worst case value is recorded. Photographs of the test setup employed are depicted in Figure 4. If the EUT exhibits spurious emissions due to internal receiver circuitry, such emissions are measured with an appropriate carrier signal applied. For devices with intentional emissions below 30 MHz, a shielded loop antenna is used as the test antenna. It is placed at a 1 meter receive height and appropriate low frequency magnetic field extrapolation to the regulatory limit distance is employed. Emissions between 30 MHz and 1 GHz are measured using tuned dipoles and/or calibrated broadband antennas. Emissions above 1 GHz are characterized using standard gain horn antennas or calibrated broadband ridge-horn antennas. Care is taken to ensure that test receiver resolution and video bandwidths meet the regulatory requirements, and that the emission bandwidth of the EUT is not reduced. Where regulations allow for direct measurement of field strength, power values (dBm) measured on the test receiver / analyzer are converted to dBµV/m at the regulatory distance, using Edist = 107 + PR + KA − KG + KE − CF where PR is the power recorded on spectrum analyzer, in dBm, KA is the test antenna factor in dB/m, KG is the combined pre-amplifier gain and cable loss in dB, KE is duty correction factor (when applicable) in dB, and CF is a distance conversion (employed only if limits are specified at alternate distance) in dB. This field strength value is then compared with the regulatory limit. If effective isotropic radiated power (EIRP) is compute, it is computed as EIRP (dBm) = E3m (dBµV /m) − 95.2. The University of Michigan Radiation Laboratory, 3228 EECS Building, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-2122 USA Page 7 of 13

Date of Issue: February 24, 2014 Prepared For: TRW Automotive Test Report No.: 417124-667 When presenting data at each frequency, the highest measured emission under all possible EUT orientations (3-axes) is reported. Figure 4: Radiated Emissions Test Setup Photograph(s). The University of Michigan Radiation Laboratory, 3228 EECS Building, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-2122 USA Page 8 of 13

Date of Issue: February 24, 2014 Prepared For: TRW Automotive Test Report No.: 417124-667 3.1.2 Conducted Emissions Test Setup and Procedures Battery Power Conducted Spurious The EUT is not subject to measurement of power line conducted emissions as it is powered solely by its internal battery. 3.1.3 Power Supply Variation Tests at extreme supply voltages are made if required by the the procedures specified in the test standard, and results of this testing are detailed in this report. In the case the EUT is designed for operation from a lead-acid battery power source, the extreme test voltages are evaluated between 90% and 130% of the nominal battery voltage declared by the manufacturer. For float charge applications using gel-cell type batteries, extreme test voltages are evaluated between 85% and 115% of the nominal battery voltage declared. For all battery operated equipment, worst case intentional and spurious emissions are re-checked employing a new (fully charged) battery. The University of Michigan Radiation Laboratory, 3228 EECS Building, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-2122 USA Page 9 of 13

Date of Issue: February 24, 2014 Prepared For: TRW Automotive Test Report No.: 417124-667 3.2 Intentional Emissions 3.2.1 Fundamental Emission Pulsed Operation The details and results of testing the EUT for pulsed operation are summarized in Table 3. Plots showing the measurements made to obtain these values are provided in Figure 5. Table 3: PulsedUM Duty Cycle Emission Computation Characteristics (Duty Cycle). When the transmitter is activated by tire rotation or via encoded LF interrogation, it can, in the worst case, transmit one 10.5 ms FSK frame or one 22.0 ms ASK frame, or two 10.5 ms ASK frames within any given 100 ms window. Both ASK frames are Manchester encoded at a 50% duty. The resulting duty cycle is computed in the table below. In the Figure that follows, (a) shows the manually activated transmission, (b) shows the periodic transmission. Duty Cycle Computation TRW; FCC/IC 1 KEFSK = 10.5 ms / 100 ms = 0.105 or -19.6 dB 2 KEASK = (22.0 ms x 0.0525 / 0.1030) / 100 ms = 0.112 or -19.0 dB Meas. U of Mich.; 2/07/2014 Figure 5(a): Pulsed Emission Characteristics (Duty Cycle). Figure 5(b): Pulsed Emission Characteristics (Duty Cycle). The University of Michigan Radiation Laboratory, 3228 EECS Building, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-2122 USA Page 10 of 13

Date of Issue: February 24, 2014 Prepared For: TRW Automotive Test Report No.: 417124-667 3.2.2 Fundamental Emission Bandwidth Emission bandwidth (EBW) of the EUT is measured with the device placed in the test mode(s) with the shortest available frame length and minimum frame spacing. Radiated emissions are recorded following the test procedures listed in Section 1.1. The 20 dB EBW is measured as the max-held peak-detected signal when the IF bandwidth is greater than or equal to 1% of the receiver span. For complex modulations other than ASK and FSK, the 99% emission bandwidth per IC test procedures has a different result, and is also separately reported.The results of EBW testing are summarized in Table 4. Plots showing measurements employed to obtain the emission bandwidth reported are provided in Figure 6. UM EBW Table Table 4: Intentional Emission Bandwidth. The emission bandwidth of the signal is shown in the following Figure. The allowed 99% bandwidth is 0.25% of 433.92 MHz, or 1084.8 kHz. Measured Emission Bandwidth TRW; FCC/IC EBW meas. # (kHz) 1 115.0 Meas. U of Mich.; 2/07/2014 Figure 6: Intentional Emission Bandwidth. The University of Michigan Radiation Laboratory, 3228 EECS Building, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-2122 USA Page 11 of 13

Date of Issue: February 24, 2014 Prepared For: TRW Automotive Test Report No.: 417124-667 3.2.3 Fundamental Emission Following the test procedures listed in Section 1.1, radiated emissions measurements are made on the EUT for both Horizontal and Vertical polarized fields. Table 5 details the results of these measurements. Table 5: Fundamental Radiated Emissions. Fundamental Radiated Emission TRW; FCC/IC Freq. Ant. Ant. Pr Det. Ka Kg E3* E3lim Pass # MHz Used Pol. dBm Used dB/m dB dBµV/m dBµV/m dB Comments 1 231008 (SHORT STEM - 20 DEGREE) 2 433.9 Dip H -22.3 Pk 21.5 21.3 65.9 72.9 6.9 end 3 433.9 Dip V -23.5 Pk 21.5 21.3 64.7 72.9 8.1 side 4 231674 (LONG STEM – 54 DEGREE) 5 433.9 Dip H -21.9 Pk 21.5 21.3 66.3 72.9 6.5 end 6 433.9 Dip V -23.6 Pk 21.5 21.3 64.6 72.9 8.2 side 7 8 * Includes 19.0 dB Duty Cycle 9 Meas. U of Mich.; 2/07/2014 Fundamental Emission vs. Supply Voltage -21.0 Relative Received Power (dB) -23.0 -25.0 -27.0 -29.0 -31.0 -33.0 -35.0 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 Supply Voltage (V) The University of Michigan Radiation Laboratory, 3228 EECS Building, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-2122 USA Page 12 of 13

Date of Issue: February 24, 2014 Prepared For: TRW Automotive Test Report No.: 417124-667 3.3 Unintentional Emissions 3.3.1 Transmit Chain Spurious Emissions The results for the measurement of transmit chain spurious emissions at the nominal voltage and temperature are provided in Table 6. Measurements are performed to 10 times the highest fundamental operating frequency. Table 6: Transmit Chain Spurious Emissions. Spurious Radiated Emissions TRW; FCC/IC Freq. Ant. Ant. Pr Det. Ka Kg E3* E3lim Pass # MHz Used Pol. dBm Used dB/m dB dBµV/m dBµV/m dB Comments 1 231008 (SHORT STEM - 20 DEGREE) 2 867.8 Dip H -63.3 Pk 27.8 17.9 34.7 47.7 13.0 flat 3 867.8 Dip V -60.8 Pk 27.8 17.9 37.2 47.7 10.5 end 4 1301.8 Horn H -33.8 Pk 20.7 28.1 46.8 54.0 7.2 flat 5 1735.7 Horn H -40.4 Pk 21.9 27.9 41.6 54.0 12.4 flat 6 2169.6 Horn H -34.1 Pk 22.9 27.0 49.8 54.0 4.2 flat 7 2603.5 Horn H -39.4 Pk 24.1 26.2 46.5 54.0 7.5 end 8 3037.4 Horn H -61.3 Pk 25.5 25.0 27.2 54.0 26.8 end 9 3471.4 Horn H -59.8 Pk 26.8 24.4 30.6 54.0 23.4 flat 10 3905.3 Horn H -67.6 Pk 28.1 23.4 25.1 54.0 28.9 end 11 4339.2 Horn H -73.0 Pk 29.5 21.0 23.5 54.0 30.5 flat 12 13 231674 (LONG STEM – 54 DEGREE) 14 867.8 Dip H -66.1 Pk 27.8 17.9 31.9 47.7 15.8 flat 15 867.8 Dip V -63.0 Pk 27.8 17.9 35.0 47.7 12.7 end 16 1301.8 Horn H -33.5 Pk 20.7 28.1 47.1 54.0 6.9 end 17 1735.7 Horn H -40.2 Pk 21.9 27.9 41.8 54.0 12.2 end 18 2169.6 Horn H -34.7 Pk 22.9 27.0 49.2 54.0 4.8 end 19 2603.5 Horn H -41.3 Pk 24.1 26.2 44.6 54.0 9.4 flat 20 3037.4 Horn H -63.7 Pk 25.5 25.0 24.8 54.0 29.2 flat 21 3471.4 Horn H -58.4 Pk 26.8 24.4 32.0 54.0 22.0 flat 22 3905.3 Horn H -66.6 Pk 28.1 23.4 26.1 54.0 27.9 flat 23 4339.2 Horn H -73.8 Pk 29.5 21.0 22.7 54.0 31.3 flat 24 25 26 27 * Includes 19.0 dB Duty Cycle. 28 Meas. U of Mich.; 2/07/2014 The University of Michigan Radiation Laboratory, 3228 EECS Building, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-2122 USA Page 13 of 13


Document Created: 2014-02-24 15:00:48
Document Modified: 2014-02-24 15:00:48
© 2025 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC