TUV Product Service Inc

0273-EX-ST-2002

Status: Grant Expired Due to New License

WB9XOI
2002-08-02

Documents and Communications: [refresh]

DescriptionCategoryDate
STA Request detailsText Documents2002-07-26
STA Request detailsText Documents2002-07-26
Application Form:
OET Special Temporary Authority Report
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL TEMPORARY AUTHORITY

Applicant Name
Name of Applicant:  TUV Product Service Inc

Address
Attention: Joel T. Schneider
Street Address: 19333 Wild Mountain Road
P.O. Box:
City: Taylors Falls
State: MN
Zip Code: 55084
Country: United States
E-Mail Address: [email protected]

Best Contact
Give the following information of person who can best handle inquiries pertaining to this application:  
Last Name: Schneider
First Name: Joel
Title: Senior Engineer
Phone Number: 651 638 0297

Explanation
Please explain in the area below why an STA is necessary:
We have been hired to do CE mark testing on an earth compactor and an asphalt compactor - commercial vehicles - that are too wide to fit into our anechoic test chamber. They weigh about 15 tons. The STA is to perform appropriate radiated immunity testing for CE mark while units are being tested for emissions at our OATS. Perform CE mark rf radiated immunity test in 80-108, 137-328.6, 335.4-406, 410-608, and 614-960 MHz ranges at 1.65 W erp. No transmissions on 156.8 and 234 MHz. Earth compactor test is 06-08 August 2002, soil compactor test if 17-19 September 2002. If one STA cannot be issued to cover both timeframes, please ignore September timeframe request and I will do 2nd submittal. Thank you.

Purpose of Operation
Please explain the purpose of operation:  RF immunity test on industrial equipment as required by European Union EMC directive.

Information
Callsign: WB9XOI
Class of Station:
Nature of Service: Experimental

Requested Period of Operation
Operation Start Date: 08/06/2002
Operation End Date: 09/17/2002

Manufacturer
List below transmitting equipment to be installed (if experimental, so state) if additional rows are required, please submit equipment list as an exhibit:  
Manufacturer Model Number No. Of Units Experimental
EMCO 3108 1 Yes
EMCO 3146 1 Yes

Certification
Neither the applicant nor any other party to the application is subject to a denial of Federal benefits that includes FCC benefits pursuant to Section 5301 of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, 21 U.S.C. Section 862, because of a conviction for possession or distribution of a controlled substance. The applicant hereby waives any claim to the use of any particular frequency or electromagnetic spectrum as against the regulatory power of the United States because of the prvious use of the same, whether by license or otherwise, and requests authorization in accordance with this application. (See Section 304 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended.) The applicant acknowledges that all statements made in this application and attached exhibits are considered material representations, and that all the exhibits part hereof and are incorporated herein as if set out in full in this application; undersigned certifies that all statements in this application are true, complete and correct to the best of his/her knowledge and belief and are made in good faith. Applicant certifies that construction of the station would NOT be an action which is likely to have a significant environmental effect. See the Commission's Rules, 47 CFR1.1301-1.1319.
Signature of Applicant (Authorized person filing form): Joel T. Schneider
Title of Applicant (if any): Senior Engineer
Date: 2002-07-26 11:46:57.953

Station Location
City State Latitude Longitude Mobile Radius of Operation
Taylors Falls Minnesota North  45  29  53 West  92  42  36 0.00
Datum:  NAD 83
Is a directional antenna (other than radar) used?   No
Exhibit submitted:   No
(a) Width of beam in degrees at the half-power point:  
(b) Orientation in horizontal plane:  
(c) Orientation in vertical plane:  
Will the antenna extend more than 6 meters above the ground, or if mounted on an existing building, will it extend more than 6 meters above the building, or will the proposed antenna be mounted on an existing structure other than a building?   No
(a) Overall height above ground to tip of antenna in meters:  
(b) Elevation of ground at antenna site above mean sea level in meters:  
(c) Distance to nearest aircraft landing area in kilometers:  
(d) List any natural formations of existing man-made structures (hills, trees, water tanks, towers, etc.) which, in the opinion of the applicant, would tend to shield the antenna from aircraft:
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
New 80.00000000-108.00000000 MHz N/A 1.650000 W 1K00A3N
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
New 137.00000000-328.60000000 MHz N/A 1.650000 W 1K00A3N
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
New 335.40000000-406.00000000 MHz N/A 1.650000 W 1K00A3N
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
New 410.00000000-608.00000000 MHz N/A 1.650000 W 1K00A3N
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
New 614.00000000-960.00000000 MHz N/A 1.650000 W 1K00A3N

20578

© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC