TUV Product Service Inc

0273-EX-ST-2002

Status: Grant Expired Due to New License

WB9XOI
2002-08-02

Documents and Communications: [refresh]

Description	Category	Date
STA Request details	Text Documents	2002-07-26

Application Form:

OET Special Temporary Authority Report

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL TEMPORARY AUTHORITY

Applicant Name

Name of Applicant:

TUV Product Service Inc

Address

Attention:	Joel T. Schneider
Street Address:	19333 Wild Mountain Road
P.O. Box:
City:	Taylors Falls
State:	MN
Zip Code:	55084
Country:	United States
E-Mail Address:	[email protected]

Best Contact

Give the following information of person who can best handle inquiries pertaining to this application:
Last Name: Schneider
First Name: Joel
Title: Senior Engineer
Phone Number: 651 638 0297

Explanation

Please explain in the area below why an STA is necessary:
We have been hired to do CE mark testing on an earth compactor and an asphalt compactor - commercial vehicles - that are too wide to fit into our anechoic test chamber. They weigh about 15 tons. The STA is to perform appropriate radiated immunity testing for CE mark while units are being tested for emissions at our OATS. Perform CE mark rf radiated immunity test in 80-108, 137-328.6, 335.4-406, 410-608, and 614-960 MHz ranges at 1.65 W erp. No transmissions on 156.8 and 234 MHz. Earth compactor test is 06-08 August 2002, soil compactor test if 17-19 September 2002. If one STA cannot be issued to cover both timeframes, please ignore September timeframe request and I will do 2nd submittal. Thank you.

Purpose of Operation

Please explain the purpose of operation:

RF immunity test on industrial equipment as required by European Union EMC directive.

Information

Callsign:	WB9XOI
Class of Station:
Nature of Service:	Experimental

Requested Period of Operation

Operation Start Date:	08/06/2002
Operation End Date:	09/17/2002

Manufacturer

Manufacturer	Model Number	No. Of Units	Experimental
List below transmitting equipment to be installed (if experimental, so state) if additional rows are required, please submit equipment list as an exhibit:
EMCO	3108	1	Yes
EMCO	3146	1	Yes

Certification

Neither the applicant nor any other party to the application is subject to a denial of Federal benefits that includes FCC benefits pursuant to Section 5301 of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, 21 U.S.C. Section 862, because of a conviction for possession or distribution of a controlled substance. The applicant hereby waives any claim to the use of any particular frequency or electromagnetic spectrum as against the regulatory power of the United States because of the prvious use of the same, whether by license or otherwise, and requests authorization in accordance with this application. (See Section 304 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended.) The applicant acknowledges that all statements made in this application and attached exhibits are considered material representations, and that all the exhibits part hereof and are incorporated herein as if set out in full in this application; undersigned certifies that all statements in this application are true, complete and correct to the best of his/her knowledge and belief and are made in good faith. Applicant certifies that construction of the station would NOT be an action which is likely to have a significant environmental effect. See the Commission's Rules, 47 CFR1.1301-1.1319.

Signature of Applicant (Authorized person filing form):	Joel T. Schneider
Title of Applicant (if any):	Senior Engineer
Date:	2002-07-26 11:46:57.953

Station Location

	City	State	Latitude	Longitude	Mobile	Radius of Operation
	Taylors Falls	Minnesota	North 45 29 53	West 92 42 36		0.00

Datum: NAD 83
Is a directional antenna (other than radar) used? No
Exhibit submitted: No
(a) Width of beam in degrees at the half-power point:
(b) Orientation in horizontal plane:
(c) Orientation in vertical plane:
Will the antenna extend more than 6 meters above the ground, or if mounted on an existing building, will it extend more than 6 meters above the building, or will the proposed antenna be mounted on an existing structure other than a building? No
(a) Overall height above ground to tip of antenna in meters:
(b) Elevation of ground at antenna site above mean sea level in meters:
(c) Distance to nearest aircraft landing area in kilometers:
(d) List any natural formations of existing man-made structures (hills, trees, water tanks, towers, etc.) which, in the opinion of the applicant, would tend to shield the antenna from aircraft:

Action	Frequency	Station Class	Output Power/ERP	Mean Peak	Frequency Tolerance (+/-)	Emission Designator	Modulating Signal
New	80.00000000-108.00000000 MHz		N/A 1.650000 W			1K00A3N

Action	Frequency	Station Class	Output Power/ERP	Mean Peak	Frequency Tolerance (+/-)	Emission Designator	Modulating Signal
New	137.00000000-328.60000000 MHz		N/A 1.650000 W			1K00A3N

Action	Frequency	Station Class	Output Power/ERP	Mean Peak	Frequency Tolerance (+/-)	Emission Designator	Modulating Signal
New	335.40000000-406.00000000 MHz		N/A 1.650000 W			1K00A3N

Action	Frequency	Station Class	Output Power/ERP	Mean Peak	Frequency Tolerance (+/-)	Emission Designator	Modulating Signal
New	410.00000000-608.00000000 MHz		N/A 1.650000 W			1K00A3N

Action	Frequency	Station Class	Output Power/ERP	Mean Peak	Frequency Tolerance (+/-)	Emission Designator	Modulating Signal
New	614.00000000-960.00000000 MHz		N/A 1.650000 W			1K00A3N

20578