Exhibit C Interference Analysis

0976-EX-ST-2018 Text Documents

Swarm Technologies, Inc.

2018-06-07ELS_210843

                                                                                   Swarm Technologies Inc.
                                                                                  Exhibit C to FCC Form 442
                                                                                               May 21, 2018
                                   Exhibit C - Interference Study


Interference and Electromagnetic Compatibility Study

       The experimental Swarm satellite network, which includes 3 satellites and 2 US
earth stations1, employs the 137-138 MHz band for space to earth, and 148-149.9 MHz
band for earth to space links, consistent with the US and International table of
frequency allocations. To demonstrate compliance with an experimental systems
obligation to operate on a non-interference basis with other authorized operators in the
bands, this report provides a three part electromagnetic compatibility study with the
existing authorized users. Specifically, the report includes: 1) a study of compatibility
with terrestrial services, 2) a study of compatibility with other satellite systems, and 3) a
study of compatibility with radio astronomy services.


Statement for Terrestrial and Aeronautical Mobile System Compatibility

     ITU Radio Regulations impose power flux density (PFD) limits that trigger
coordination for certain terrestrial (fixed and mobile) and aeronautical mobile systems
                                                                2
in the 137-138 MHz band and adjacent 138-143.6 MHz band . In summary the PFD
thresholds that trigger coordination are as follows:

    ● Terrestrial Services: -125 dBW/m​2​/4KHz
    ● Aeronautical Mobile (R): -125 dBW/m​2​/4KHz
    ● Aeronautical Mobile (OR): -140 dBW/m​2​/4KHz

     Figure 1 shows a plot of the expected PFD at Earth’s surface for all angles of
arrival at the operational orbit altitude. Note that due to the antenna gain pattern, the
PFD at ​Earth’s surface diminishes significantly as the satellite elevation increases
towards 90 degrees. The gain pattern is optimal for communications at elevations 10 to
60 degrees where the majority of ground access time occurs.




1
  The three satellites for which an authorization is sought will transmit only when within line of sight of two
US earth stations, one in Palo Alto CA, and one in Atlanta GA, when commanded by the ground
station. No other earth stations will transmit to the three satellites.
2
  ITU RR Appendix 5, Annex 1, article 1.1.1 and 1.1.2


                                                                   Swarm Technologies Inc.
                                                                  Exhibit C to FCC Form 442
                                                                               May 21, 2018




     Figure 1. PFD at Earth’s surface produced by a satellite transmission

         In summary, the power flux density (PFD) at the Earth’s surface produced by the
Swarm satellites will not exceed -153 dB(W/m²) in any 4 kHz band at any angle of
arrival, which is under the threshold for coordination with both terrestrial services and
aeronautical mobile (R or OR) and therefore​ does not trigger a coordination requirement.


Statement of Satellite ServiceSystem Compatibility

    From the ITU Space Network Systems Online (SNS), a list of satellite systems
using the 137-138 MHz band and 148-150.05 MHz band was collected and shown in
Table 1 and Table 2, respectively. For each satellite system, the table indicates the
administrative jurisdiction, service areas, frequency overlaps, and ultimately a
disposition for a coordination requirement. Most satellites have either no frequency
overlap with Swarm satellites, have no area coverage overlap, or earth stations in the
USA. In addition, a search of the FCC IBFS for the 137-138 MHz band and 148-150.05
MHz band show that only Orbcomm is licensed for a space system using these space
services links within the United states. In summary, only Orbcomm Satellites, NOAA N,
and GOES West satellites require some form of coordination for operations in the USA.
Swarm will seek consent from both the NTIA and Orbcomm regarding those systems.


                                                                                Swarm Technologies Inc.
                                                                               Exhibit C to FCC Form 442
                                                                                            May 21, 2018
        The Interference Protection Criteria (IPC) for meteorological satellites3 in the
137-138 MHz band is -136 dBW per 150 kHz. This IPC is applicable for the NOAA N and
NOAA KLM satellites. There is no frequency overlap with NOAA KLM and therefore no
interference is expected. The NOAA N earth stations may have an isotropic gain as high
as 10 dBi4 and in this case the signal power from a Swarm satellite into a NOAA N ground
receiver could reach -132.8 dBW exceeding the IPC. This however will be a rare situation
where a Swarm satellite is transmitting at the same time the NOAA N earth station is
pointed in the direction of the Swarm satellite (given a 10 dBi antenna has some
directionality). In fact, potential interference conjunctions above -136 dBW/150 kHz IPC is
estimated to occur less than 0.00037% of the time which meets the IPC limit of less than
0.0063% of the time (as specified by the previously referenced ITU recommendation.)
This is estimated as follows5: The Swarm transmissions will occur less than 0.069% of the
time daily over each ground station. The NOAA N satellite may transmit up to 3.3% of the
time daily in the same area. A 10 dBi earth station antenna has a 6 dB beamwidth of
approximately 72 degrees, which is about 16% sky coverage. This results in a potential
interference conjunction exceeding -136 dBW into the earth station receiver no more than
0.00037% of the time. Therefore the experimental Swarm satellite system meets the IPC
for NOAA N and coordination should not actually be required. Note that this estimate
assumes the worst case scenario that the satellites share a similar orbit and equatorial
crossing time and anything otherwise would yield a smaller conjunction percentage.

        The GOES West satellite is a Geosynchronous system with a 148.545 MHz receiver
and there is no potential for interference from a Swarm earth station due to its low
transmit power and path loss. The Swarm earth station transmits with a maximum EIRP
density of -56 dBW/Hz and with path loss the receivable power at the Geosynchronous
orbit is -224 dBW/Hz. A GOES earth station transmits with an EIRP density of about 1.7
dBW/Hz and with path loss the receivable power at the GOES satellite is -165 dBW/Hz
which is 59 dB higher than a Swarm signal and interference is very unlikely.




3
 ITU R-REC-SA.1027-5, Table 1, Sharing Criteria at 137-138 MHz, Interfering signal power (dBW) should
not exceed –136 dBW per 150 kHz more than 0.0063% of the time.
4
    ​The ITU SNS for NOAA N shows receive antenna type ND with up to 10 dBi isotropic gain.
5
     Swarm transmissions: 2 second duration * 10 contacts * 3 satellites / 1440 minutes/day = 0.069%,
NOAA transmissions: 12 minute duration * 4 contacts * 1 satellite / 1440 minutes/day = 3.3%,
NOAA earth station antenna sky coverage: PI*(72 deg beamwidth / 2)^2 / PI*(90 deg)^2 = 16%


                                                                        Swarm Technologies Inc.
                                                                       Exhibit C to FCC Form 442
                                                                                    May 21, 2018
       There are three other satellite systems shown in the tables below deserving
additional attention, IMDC, SI-SAT-BILIKIKI, and HOL-MG-A006. In all three cases
there is potential frequency overlap and the USA is a designated coverage area in the
ITU notices. However, none of these systems have launched yet, and no US licenses
or applications were submitted to the FCC as of December 2017. The IMDC system is a
single satellite by the company Innovative Solutions In Space in the Netherlands. It
appears there will only be an earth station in the Netherlands. The SI-SAT-BILIKIKI and
HOL-MG-A006 are both planned large Mobile Satellite Service constellations by
Pangea Networks LLC and Hiber (formerly Magnitude Space), respectively. Pangea
Networks is a US based company but filed their satellite system notification through
the Solomon Islands administration. Hiber is a Netherlands based company and filed
their satellite system notification through the Netherlands administration. In both
cases, the status of their launch authorization licensing and construction progress
is unknown by Swarm Neither entity has any space system licensing within the United
States.

       In these tables, red-colored boxes indicate frequency overlap between the
respective system in the row and the Swarm satellites. Green rows indicate some
level of coordination or additional consideration is required for the system.

Table 1: List of Satellite Systems in the ITU SNS, transmitting 137-138 MHz
Satellite      Country   Service Area    Freq Overlap   Coordination   Notes
                                         (max freq      requirement
                                         shown)
AGILE          Italy     XVE             138            None           Equatorial NGSO,
                         Kenya ES                                      no orbital access to USA.
ATS-5          USA       GEO             ...137.365     None           GEO, no frequency overlap
                         NC ES
EUTELSAT-48E   France    GEO             ...137.230     None           GEO, no frequency overlap
                         Belgium ES
IMDC           Nether    XAA,            137.9-138      None           Not launched yet?
               lands     Netherland ES   E-S, S-E                      No US license/stations
                                                                       Innovative Solutions In Space
IMP-J          USA       AK, NC ES       ...137.995     None           Inactive, 1970’s
LEOTELCOM-1    USA       XAX             ...137.325     Orbcomm        No frequency overlap
                         (world)                        Consent
LEOTELCOM-2    USA       XAX             ...137.928     Orbcomm        To be coordinated with
                                                        Consent        Orbcomm
LEOTELCOM-5    USA       XAA             ...137.655     Orbcomm        No frequency overlap
                                                        Consent
MCSCS          China     XAA (world)     ...137.525     None           No frequency overlap
METEOR-3M      Russia    XAA             ...137.975     None           deactivated March 2006
METOP          France    XAA             ...137.1       None           No frequency overlap

NOAA N         USA       XAA             ...137.932     NTIA consent   To be coordinated w/ NTIA
                                                        IPC met        IPC met
NOAA-KLM       USA       XAA             ...137.793     None           No frequency overlap
RS-D2          India     IND (India)     ...137.550     None           No area or frequency overlap


                                                                             Swarm Technologies Inc.
                                                                            Exhibit C to FCC Form 442
                                                                                         May 21, 2018
SAUDISAT-1C        Saudi     ARS              ...137.525      None          No area or frequency overlap
                   Arabia    (Saudi Arabia)
SAUDISAT-2         Saudi     ARS              ...137.513      None          No area or frequency overlap
                   Arabia
SEO                India     IND              ...137.990      None          No area overlap, 1980’s
BHASKARA-1
SEO                India     IND              ...137.990      None          No area overlap, 1980’s
BHASKARA-2
SI-SAT-BILIKIK     Solomon   XAA              137-138         None          Not launched yet
I                  Island                     (1 MHz)                       No US license/stations
(300 satellites)                                                            Pangea Networks
SROSS-1            India     IND              ...137.690      None          No area or frequency overlap
                                                                            1990’s



Table 2: List of Satellite Systems in the ITU SNS, receiving 148-150.05 MHz
Satellite          Country   Service Area     Freq Overlap    Coordinatio   Notes
                                              (closest freq   n
                                              shown)          requirement
AGILE              Italy     XVE              149.0           None          No area overlap
                             space to         2 MHz                         Equatorial orbit
                             space link                                     Leotelcom-1 space link
ATS-5              USA       GEO              148.26          None          No frequency overlap
                             NC ES            30 kHz
CASSIOPE-1A        Canada    XAA              150.005... Tx   None          No frequency overlap
GOES West          USA       GEO              148.545         NTIA          To be coordinated w/ NTIA
                             Wallops VA       30 KHz          Consent       IPC met
                                                              IPC met
HOL-MG-A006        Nether    XAA              148-149.9       None          Not launched yet
(140 satellites)   lands                      12 kHz                        No US license/stations
                                                                            Magnitude Space (Hiber)
IMP-J              USA       AK, NC ES        148.98          None          No frequency overlap
                                              30 kHz                        Inactive, 1970’s
IPS                Nether    HOL              ...148.118      None          No area or frequency overlap
                   lands
IRS-1B, 1E         India     India            149.522         None          No area overlap
                                              12 kHz
KITSAT-3           Korea     Korea            148.025,148.9   None          No area or frequency overlap
                                              20 kHz
LEOTELCOM-1        USA       XAX              148-150.05      Orbcomm       To be coordinated with
                             (world)                          Consent       Orbcomm
LEOTELCOM-2        USA       XAX              148-148.905     Orbcomm       To be coordinated with
                                                              Consent       Orbcomm
LEOTELCOM-3        USA       XAX              149.81-149.9    None          No frequency overlap
                             (world)
LEOTELCOM-5        USA       XAA              148-150.05      Orbcomm       To be coordinated with
                                                              Consent       Orbcomm
LUX-NGSO           Luxemb    XAA              149.0-151.0     None          No frequency overlap
-1/2/3             ourg
MCSCS              China     XAA (world)      149.025         None          No frequency overlap
                                              44 kHz                        No US stations


                                                                              Swarm Technologies Inc.
                                                                             Exhibit C to FCC Form 442
                                                                                          May 21, 2018
RS-D2             India      IND (India)      ...148.265       None           No area or frequency overlap
S4P               Swiss      HOL, SUI         148.2635         None           No area overlap
                                              -148.5865
SAUDISAT-1C       Saudi      ARS              149.025          None           No area or frequency overlap
                  Arabia     (Saudi Arabia)   44 kHz
SEO               India      IND              ...148.265,      None           No area or frequency overlap
BHASKARA-1                                    148.595...                      1980’s
SEO               India      IND              ...148.265,      None           No area or frequency overlap
BHASKARA-2                                    148.595...                      1980’s
SI-SAT-BILIKIK    Solomon    XAA              149.025          None           No frequency overlap
I                 Island                      100 kHz                         No US license/stations
SROSS-1,-3        India      IND              149.272...       None           No area or frequency overlap
TELEOS-1          SNG        SNG              148.6875...      None           No area or frequency overlap
TSYKADA           Russia     XAA              149.903...       None           No frequency overlap
YOUTHSAT          India      XAX              149.995...       None           No frequency overlap




Radio Astronomy ServiceProtection
    Pursuant to the ITU Radio Regulations 5.208A, Swarm's satellites meet the ITU
recommendations6 to avoid interference with the nearby Radio Astronomy Service
(RAS) band (150.05-153 MHz). The satellites transmit only in the 137-138 MHz band
and out of band emissions are minimized by digital modulation techniques and filtering
with at least 85 dB spectral roll-off 7 at 150 MHz resulting in a power flux density (pfd) at
Earth’s surface not exceeding -274.5 dB(W/(m​2​ · Hz)) thereby meeting the RAS
protection criteria of -259 dB(W/(m​2​ · Hz))8.

     Ground stations transmit in the adjacent 148-149.9 MHz band and employ
the same digital modulation techniques and filtering as satellites with at least 70 dB
spectral rolloff at 150.05 MHz from a transmit frequency at 148.5 MHz.
Nevertheless Ground stations will be positioned at a distance or otherwise obstructed
such to prevent line-of-site observations by a Radio Astronomy site using the
150.05-153 MHz band9 and resulting in a signal attenuation that meets the RAS
interference protection criteria. In addition, the frequency of transmissions from



6
  ​ITU Radio Regulations, Resolution 739 (Rev. WRC-15) and Recommendation ITU-R M.1583.
7
  Measured performance at 150 Mhz is -86 dBc within the limits of the test equipment and likely exceeds
this performance in the RAS bands. -80 dBc occurs at 3 Mhz from the carrier.
8
  ​As specified in ITU-R M.1583, the protection criteria is -238 dB(W/m​2​) in a 2.95 MHz reference
bandwidth and as recommended in ITU-R RA.769-2 Table 1, the threshold for harmful interference is
-259 dB(W/(m​2​ · Hz)) at a center frequency 151.525 MHz.
9
 Recommendation ITU-R RA.769-1 specifies “above about 40 MHz sharing may be practicable with
services in which the transmitters are not in direct line-of-sight of the observatories”.


                                                                                Swarm Technologies Inc.
                                                                               Exhibit C to FCC Form 442
                                                                                            May 21, 2018
the Swarm earth stations is much less than 2% of the time10 which also meets the RAS
protection criteria11.




Conclusion

     The experimental satellites and US earth stations pose no risk of creating harmful
interference with any known system with the exception of Orbcomm. As represented
above, Swarm satellite transmissions are compliant with the frequency allocation
tables and meet PFD based protection criteria for terrestrial systems and RAS as well
as meteorological satellite systems. Swarm will seek specific consent from Orbcomm
to mitigate any potential for interference with their system.




10
     The experimental transmissions are at a maximum of 2 second durations 30 times per day
(~0.069% of the time). This accounts for 3 satellites with up to 10 contacts each per day.
11
     ITU RR 2016, Resolution 739, article g, and ITU-R RA.1513-2, article 2.



Document Created: 2018-06-04 12:38:00
Document Modified: 2018-06-04 12:38:00

© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC