Toggle navigation
FCC.report
IBFS
ELS
FCC ID
Contact
About
FCC.report
›
ELS
›
Flarion Technologies, Inc.
›
0171-EX-ST-2002
Flarion Technologies, Inc.
0171-EX-ST-2002
Status: Denied/Dismissed
WB9XLW
2002-05-17
Documents and Communications:
[
refresh
]
Description
Category
Date
SBE Coordination
Correspondence
2002-05-07
E-Mail generated [May 02, 2002]
Correspondence
2002-05-02
Response to E-Mail generated [May 02, 2002]
Correspondence
2002-05-07
Dismissal Without Prejudice generated [May 17, 2002]
Correspondence
2003-09-16
Photo of antennas and mast
Images
2002-04-24
SBE Coordination
Correspondence
2002-05-07
E-Mail generated [May 02, 2002]
Correspondence
2002-05-02
Response to E-Mail generated [May 02, 2002]
Correspondence
2002-05-07
Dismissal Without Prejudice generated [May 17, 2002]
Correspondence
2003-09-16
Photo of antennas and mast
Images
2002-04-24
Application Form:
OET Special Temporary Authority Report
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL TEMPORARY AUTHORITY
Applicant Name
Name of Applicant:
Flarion Technologies, Inc.
Address
Attention:
Jim Durcan
Street Address:
Bedminster One, 135 Route 202/206 South
P.O. Box:
City:
Bedminster
State:
NJ
Zip Code:
07921
Country:
E-Mail Address:
[email protected]
Best Contact
Give the following information of person who can best handle inquiries pertaining to this application:
Last Name:
Durcan
First Name:
Jim
Title:
Product Manager
Phone Number:
908-947-7000
Explanation
Please explain in the area below why an STA is necessary:
Flarion requests authorization, pursuant to Section 5.61 of the Commission's Rules, to operate an experimental prototype from May 6, 2002 through May 10, 2002. Flarion seeks to operate its equipment, which the Commission has already authorized it to operate on a permanent experimental basis at its headquarters in Bedminster, NJ and New York, NY (Call Sign WC2XLF), on a temporary basis for demonstration in San Jose, California. Flarion is seeking STA because the scope and duration of its proposed operation warrant only temporary authority under Part 5 of the Commission's rules. Flarion's request for STA is supported by good cause. Flarion is developing a new broadband mobile data communications system in the 700 MHz band. Flarion has been invited to demonstrate the performance and capabilities of the system to parties interested in Flarion's technology. Flarion seeks to develop products that will ultimately result in the more efficient use of the radio spectrum. Demonstrating the device before interested parties allows Flarion to receive critical feedback, enabling the company to continue to make modifications to its system before marketing the device. To this end, Flarion seeks the feedback of experts to improve the responsiveness of the unit before committing additional resources to full-scale commercial production. With the exception of location, the instant STA request is identical to one that the Commission granted for Flarion to operate its facility in Chantilly, VA (see File No. 0163-EX-ST-2002).
Purpose of Operation
Please explain the purpose of operation:
Demonstration of a broadband mobile system.
Information
Callsign:
WB9XLW
Class of Station:
FX MO
Nature of Service:
Experimental
Requested Period of Operation
Operation Start Date:
05/06/2002
Operation End Date:
05/10/2002
Manufacturer
List below transmitting equipment to be installed (if experimental, so state) if additional rows are required, please submit equipment list as an exhibit:
Manufacturer
Model Number
No. Of Units
Experimental
Flarion Technologies
Experimental
1
Yes
Certification
Neither the applicant nor any other party to the application is subject to a denial of Federal benefits that includes FCC benefits pursuant to Section 5301 of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, 21 U.S.C. Section 862, because of a conviction for possession or distribution of a controlled substance. The applicant hereby waives any claim to the use of any particular frequency or electromagnetic spectrum as against the regulatory power of the United States because of the prvious use of the same, whether by license or otherwise, and requests authorization in accordance with this application. (See Section 304 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended.) The applicant acknowledges that all statements made in this application and attached exhibits are considered material representations, and that all the exhibits part hereof and are incorporated herein as if set out in full in this application; undersigned certifies that all statements in this application are true, complete and correct to the best of his/her knowledge and belief and are made in good faith. Applicant certifies that construction of the station would NOT be an action which is likely to have a significant environmental effect. See the Commission's Rules, 47 CFR1.1301-1.1319.
Signature of Applicant (Authorized person filing form):
Peter A. Carson
Title of Applicant (if any):
Vice President, Bu
Date:
2002-04-24 15:43:01.053
Station Location
City
State
Latitude
Longitude
Mobile
Radius of Operation
San Jose
California
North 37 24 40
West 121 55 38
4.00
Datum:
NAD 27
Is a directional antenna (other than radar) used?
No
Exhibit submitted:
No
(a) Width of beam in degrees at the half-power point:
(b) Orientation in horizontal plane:
(c) Orientation in vertical plane:
Will the antenna extend more than 6 meters above the ground, or if mounted on an existing building, will it extend more than 6 meters above the building, or will the proposed antenna be mounted on an existing structure other than a building?
Yes
(a) Overall height above ground to tip of antenna in meters:
13.00
(b) Elevation of ground at antenna site above mean sea level in meters:
6.00
(c) Distance to nearest aircraft landing area in kilometers:
5.00
(d) List any natural formations of existing man-made structures (hills, trees, water tanks, towers, etc.) which, in the opinion of the applicant, would tend to shield the antenna from aircraft:
The antennas are mounted on an extendable mast which is mounted on a light truck. The mast extends to a maximum height of 40 feet above ground level (AGL). The truck is located in the immediate vicinity of taller buildings and is completely shielded from all air traffic by the surrounding buildings. The truck is located in the congested area of San Jose and is evident beyond all reasonable doubt that the truck, mast and antenna, so shielded, do not adversely affect safety in air navigation. Thus, under section 17.14(a) of the FCC Rules, the proposed structure is exempt from notice to the FAA.
Action
Frequency
Station Class
Output Power/ERP
Mean Peak
Frequency Tolerance (+/-)
Emission Designator
Modulating Signal
New
747.00000000-762.00000000 MHz
FX
N/A 20.000000 W
M
1M25D7D
OFDM
Action
Frequency
Station Class
Output Power/ERP
Mean Peak
Frequency Tolerance (+/-)
Emission Designator
Modulating Signal
New
777.00000000-792.00000000 MHz
MO
N/A 600.000000 mW
M
1M25D7D
OFDM
City
State
Latitude
Longitude
Mobile
Radius of Operation
Santa Clara
California
North 37 24 21
West 121 58 35
4.00
Datum:
NAD 27
Is a directional antenna (other than radar) used?
No
Exhibit submitted:
No
(a) Width of beam in degrees at the half-power point:
(b) Orientation in horizontal plane:
(c) Orientation in vertical plane:
Will the antenna extend more than 6 meters above the ground, or if mounted on an existing building, will it extend more than 6 meters above the building, or will the proposed antenna be mounted on an existing structure other than a building?
Yes
(a) Overall height above ground to tip of antenna in meters:
13.00
(b) Elevation of ground at antenna site above mean sea level in meters:
3.00
(c) Distance to nearest aircraft landing area in kilometers:
5.00
(d) List any natural formations of existing man-made structures (hills, trees, water tanks, towers, etc.) which, in the opinion of the applicant, would tend to shield the antenna from aircraft:
The antennas are mounted on an extendable mast which is mounted on a light truck. The mast extends to a maximum height of 40 feet above ground level (AGL). The truck is located in the immediate vicinity of taller buildings and is completely shielded from all air traffic by the surrounding buildings. The truck is located in the congested area of Santa Clara and is evident beyond all reasonable doubt that the truck, mast and antenna, so shielded, do not adversely affect safety in air navigation. Thus, under section 17.14(a) of the FCC Rules, the proposed structure is exempt from notice to the FAA.
Action
Frequency
Station Class
Output Power/ERP
Mean Peak
Frequency Tolerance (+/-)
Emission Designator
Modulating Signal
New
747.00000000-762.00000000 MHz
FX
N/A 20.000000 W
M
1M25D7D
OFDM
Action
Frequency
Station Class
Output Power/ERP
Mean Peak
Frequency Tolerance (+/-)
Emission Designator
Modulating Signal
New
777.00000000-792.00000000 MHz
MO
N/A 600.000000 mW
M
1M25D7D
OFDM
City
State
Latitude
Longitude
Mobile
Radius of Operation
Santa Clara
California
North 37 24 7
West 121 58 35
4.00
Datum:
NAD 27
Is a directional antenna (other than radar) used?
No
Exhibit submitted:
No
(a) Width of beam in degrees at the half-power point:
(b) Orientation in horizontal plane:
(c) Orientation in vertical plane:
Will the antenna extend more than 6 meters above the ground, or if mounted on an existing building, will it extend more than 6 meters above the building, or will the proposed antenna be mounted on an existing structure other than a building?
Yes
(a) Overall height above ground to tip of antenna in meters:
13.00
(b) Elevation of ground at antenna site above mean sea level in meters:
3.00
(c) Distance to nearest aircraft landing area in kilometers:
5.00
(d) List any natural formations of existing man-made structures (hills, trees, water tanks, towers, etc.) which, in the opinion of the applicant, would tend to shield the antenna from aircraft:
The antennas are mounted on an extendable mast which is mounted on a light truck. The mast extends to a maximum height of 40 feet above ground level (AGL). The truck is located in the immediate vicinity of taller buildings and is completely shielded from all air traffic by the surrounding buildings. The truck is located in the congested area of San Clara and is evident beyond all reasonable doubt that the truck, mast and antenna, so shielded, do not adversely affect safety in air navigation. Thus, under section 17.14(a) of the FCC Rules, the proposed structure is exempt from notice to the FAA.
Action
Frequency
Station Class
Output Power/ERP
Mean Peak
Frequency Tolerance (+/-)
Emission Designator
Modulating Signal
New
747.00000000-762.00000000 MHz
FX
N/A 20.000000 W
M
1M25D7D
OFDM
Action
Frequency
Station Class
Output Power/ERP
Mean Peak
Frequency Tolerance (+/-)
Emission Designator
Modulating Signal
New
777.00000000-792.00000000 MHz
MO
N/A 600.000000 mW
M
1M25D7D
OFDM
City
State
Latitude
Longitude
Mobile
Radius of Operation
Milpitas
California
North 37 25 17
West 121 55 13
4.00
Datum:
NAD 27
Is a directional antenna (other than radar) used?
No
Exhibit submitted:
No
(a) Width of beam in degrees at the half-power point:
(b) Orientation in horizontal plane:
(c) Orientation in vertical plane:
Will the antenna extend more than 6 meters above the ground, or if mounted on an existing building, will it extend more than 6 meters above the building, or will the proposed antenna be mounted on an existing structure other than a building?
Yes
(a) Overall height above ground to tip of antenna in meters:
13.00
(b) Elevation of ground at antenna site above mean sea level in meters:
6.00
(c) Distance to nearest aircraft landing area in kilometers:
5.00
(d) List any natural formations of existing man-made structures (hills, trees, water tanks, towers, etc.) which, in the opinion of the applicant, would tend to shield the antenna from aircraft:
The antennas are mounted on an extendable mast which is mounted on a light truck. The mast extends to a maximum height of 40 feet above ground level (AGL). The truck is located in the immediate vicinity of taller buildings and is completely shielded from all air traffic by the surrounding buildings. The truck is located in the congested area of Milpitas and is evident beyond all reasonable doubt that the truck, mast and antenna, so shielded, do not adversely affect safety in air navigation. Thus, under section 17.14(a) of the FCC Rules, the proposed structure is exempt from notice to the FAA.
Action
Frequency
Station Class
Output Power/ERP
Mean Peak
Frequency Tolerance (+/-)
Emission Designator
Modulating Signal
New
747.00000000-762.00000000 MHz
FX
N/A 20.000000 W
M
1M25D7D
OFDM
Action
Frequency
Station Class
Output Power/ERP
Mean Peak
Frequency Tolerance (+/-)
Emission Designator
Modulating Signal
New
777.00000000-792.00000000 MHz
MO
N/A 600.000000 mW
M
1M25D7D
OFDM
38254
© 2025 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC