Request for confidentiality

0109-EX-PL-2004 Text Documents

Cisco Systems Inc

2004-06-21ELS_66386

Marlene H. Dortch
Secretary
Federal Communications Commission
445 12th St. NW
Washington DC 20554

Re: APPLICATION NUMBER HERE Request for Confidential Treatment of
Material Filed

FILED ELECTRONICALLY

Dear Ms. Dortch:

    On May 25, 2004, Cisco Systems, Inc. (hereinafter “Cisco”) filed an applications for
two experimental radio licenses for the 4.9 GHz band. Per section 0.459 of the
Commission’s rules, this letter requests confidential treatment of material filed in support
of the above-referenced application. Cisco submits the following in conformance with
the requirements of section 0.459(b) of the Commission’s rules:

   1. Identification of the specific information for which confidential treatment is
      sought.
         • Document entitled “Theory of Operation,” including the list of radio
              parameters and a diagram of our experimental radio system.

   2. Identification of the Commission proceeding in which the information was
      submitted.
         • OET Experimental License Application File 0108-EX-PL-2004 and 0109-EX-PL-
               2004

   3. Explanation of the degree to which the information is commercial or financial, or
      contains a trade secret or is privileged.
         • In 2003, the Commission authorized spectrum at 4.9 GHz to be licensed to
             public safety licensees. Cisco is one of several manufacturers interested in
             producing equipment for 4.9 GHz public safety licensees, as is evidenced
             by other experimental applications that have been filed. As a result,
             information about Cisco’s experimental activities could be of commercial
             benefit to competitors.

   4. Explanation of the degree to which the information concerns a service that is
      subject to competition.


       •   Based on the experimental license applications on file at the FCC, Cisco
           anticipates that several manufacturers are interested in producing
           equipment to serve public safety licensees at 4.9 GHz.

5. Explanation for how disclosure of the information could result in substantial
   competitive harm.
      • The information contained in the document presents information about a
         conceptual product that is being evaluated for possible commercial
         development. If competitors were to have access to this document, they
         would have knowledge of Cisco’s pending business plans, and would be
         able to use this advance knowledge to their advantage. This could result
         in substantial competitive harm to Cisco’s ability to bring a 4.9 GHz
         product to market, should that decision be made.

6. Identification of any measures taken by the submitting party to prevent
   unauthorized disclosure.
      • Information about Cisco’s products under development is considered by
           the company to be commercially sensitive information that employees are
           not permitted to discuss outside the company.

7. Identification of whether the information is available to the public and the extent
   of any previous disclosure of information to third parties.
       • Information about product development is not routinely provided to the
           public, and is not available on Cisco’s web site. No information about this
           product has been disclosed.

8. Justification of the period during which the submitting party asserts that material
   should not be available for public disclosure.
       • Cisco requests that the above-identified material not be disclosed for 1
           year. This period should provide sufficient time for Cisco to make its
           evaluation of the product.

9. Any other information that the party seeking confidential treatment believes may
   be useful in assessing whether its request for confidentiality should be granted.
       • Not applicable.

                                                         Sincerely,



                                                         David Case



Document Created: 2004-06-21 12:18:16
Document Modified: 2004-06-21 12:18:16

© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC