Attachment SES-STA-20190604-007

SES-STA-20190604-007

DECISION submitted by FCC

Grant

0000-00-00

This document pretains to SES-STA-20190604-00724 for Special Temporal Authority on a Satellite Earth Station filing.

IBFS_SESSTA2019060400724_1845907

F I C C) o C X C C) 0 C 0 C 0 C%1 C) U C C%I t... riD C 0 z .2 — o o E— - I C C/) x wc, C C C C 0 0 N Cl) 7 C) CI) Cl) 0 C) U - C C/) C - - C Cl) H-C 0 <C — E CCI •CIZ ZriD

2. Contact Name: Joseph A. Godles Phone Number: 202—429—4900 Company: Goldberg, Godles, Wiener & Fax Number: Wright LLP Street: 1025 Connecticut Aye, NW E—Mail: jgodlesg2w2.com Ste 1000 City: Washington State: DC Country: USA Zipcode: 20036 — Attention: Relationship: Legal Counsel (If your application is related to an application filed with the Commission, enter either the file number or the 13 Submission ID of the related application. Please enter only one.) 3. Reference file Number or Submission ID 4a. Is a fee submitted with this application? If Yes, complete and attach FCC Form 159. If No, indicate reason for fee exemption (see 47 C.F.R.Section 1.1114). • Governmental Entity Noncommercial educational licensee o Other(please explain): 4b. Fee Classification CGX — Fixed Satellite Transmit/Receive Earth Station 5. Type Request Change Station Location Other o Use Prior to Grant 6. Requested Use Prior Date 2

7. City 8. Latitude (dd mm ss.s h) 0 0 0.0 N 9. State 10. Longitude (dd mm ss.s h) 0 0 0.0 W 1 1. Please supply any need attachments. Attachment 1: Attachment 1 Attachment 2: Attachment 2 Attachment 3: Attachment 3 ODAR 12. Description. (If the complete description does not appear in this box, please go to the end of the form to view it in its entirety.) Telesat Canada seeks STA for up to 30 days for earth stations to test, validate, and demonstrate communications with Telesat’s LEO 1 satellite. See Attachment 1 13. By checking Yes, the undersigned certifies that neither applicant nor any other party to the application is Yes No subject to a denial of Federal benefits that includes FCC benefits pursuant to Section 530] of the Anti—Drug Act of 1988,21 U.S.C. Section 862, because of a conviction for possession or distribution of a controlled substance. See 47 CFR 1.2002(b) for the meaning of &quot;party to the application&quot; for these purposes. 14. Name of Person Signing 15. Title of Person Signing El isabeth Neasmith Director, Spectrum Management & Development WILLFUL FALSE STATEMENTS MADE ON THIS FORM ARE PUNISHABLE BY FINE AND / OR IMPRISONMENT (U.S. Code, Title 1$, Section 1001), AND/OR REVOCATION Of ANY STATION AUTHORIZATION (U.S. Code, Title 47, Section 312(a)(1)), AND/OR FORFEITURE (U.S. Code, Title 47, Section 503). 3

L H I V a ft Si Ii II L S Sc II ‘flO pI ‘U Hi I’ 1•

— File Call Sian Grant Dates ——\C \ (or other identifier) — CN ‘Ie Dates Applicant: Telesat Canada GRANTED From:’ ‘7 To:%c-i File No.: SES-STA201 90604-00724 International Bureau Call Sign: N/A Special Temporary Authority Approved: (Lc - Telesat Canada (“Telesat”) is granted requesting a special temporary authority, for 30 days, beginning August 7, 2019 to operate two Intellian Modle Vi 5OKa, 1.50 meter earth stations, one , located in Pompano Beach, FL and the other located in Melbourne, FL to conduct loop-back tests with Telesat’s non-geostationary orbit (“NGSO”) satellite, LEO 1 in the 1000 km x 1000 km, 99.5° inclined NGSO orbit in the 28.6-29.1 GHz (Earth-to-space) and 18.8-19.3 GHz (space-to-Earth) frequency bands under the following conditions: 1. Operations will not exceed the operational power levels and parameters. 2. All operations under this grant of special temporary authority shall be on an unprotected and non-harmful interference basis. Telesat shall not cause harmful interference to and shall not claim protection from interference caused to it by, any other lawfully operating radio communication system. 3. In the event of any harmful interference under this grant of special temporary authority, Telesat must cease operations immediately upon notification of such interference, and must inform the Commission, in writing, immediately of such an event. 4 LEO 1 satellite operations in the 18.8-19.3 GHz (space-to-Earth) frequency band shall comply to the following conditions: a). LEO 1 satellite shall only turn on and downlink in the 18.8-19.3 GHz frequency band while in view of the ground stations at Pompano Beach, FL and Melbourne, FL and; b). LEO 1 satellite transmit antenna gain in the 18.8-i 9.3 GHz frequency band is 25.5 dBi and the total maximum EIRP for the downlink in the 18.8-1 9.3 GHz frequency band is 36 dBW. 5. Telsat Canada is required to provide the Air Force (Email: Jmmy.Nguyen@us.af.mil) with the stop buzzer P00 for operations in the 18.8-1 9.3 GHz (space-to-Earth) frequency band. 6. All operators of satellites will be provided with an emergency phone number where the licensee can be reached in the event that harmful interference occurs, Currently the 24x7 contact information for Telesat’s LEO 1 mission is Ph.: (321 -733-9015) in Melbourne, FL. -Request to speak to William Mudge and Ph.: (213-465-5829) in Pompano Beach, FL. -Request to speak to Jio Castro. 7. Any action taken or expense incurred as a result of operations pursuant to this special temporary authority is solely at Telesat’s risk. 8. Grant of this authorization is without prejudice to any determination that the Commission may make regarding pending or future Telesat applications This action is issued pursuant to Section 0.261 of the Commission’s rules on delegated authority, 47 C.F.R. §0.261, and is effective immediately.

Telesat Canada Attachment 1 REQUEST FOR SPECIAL TEMPORARY AUTHORITY Telesat Canada (“Telesat”), pursuant to Section 25.120 of the Commission’s rules, hereby requests Special Temporary Authority (“STA”) to operate two earth stations one located - in Pompano Beach, Florida and the other located in Melbourne, Florida to conduct loop-back - tests with Telesat’s non-geostationary orbit (“NGSO”) low earth orbit satellite, LEO 1. Telesat seeks an STA for the 30-day period beginning on August 6, 2019. The technical specifications for these operations are set forth in Attachment 2a and 2b hereto, which provides the information that would be appear in Schedule B of FCC form 312, if regular authority were being sought. LEO 1 was launched in January 2018 and is currently in its final mission orbit of 99.5° (circular) at an altitude of 1000 km. Telesat will operate LEO 1 pursuant to the requested STA in accordance with the technical parameters that were specified in Telesat’s Petition for Declaratory Ruling to Grant Access to the U.S. Market for Telesat’s NGSO Constellation (“PDW”), including Schedule S thereto, which was granted by the Commission by Order and Declaratory Ruling, released November 3, 2017.1 STA operations will be limited to two of the bands covered by the PDR, i.e., 28.6-29.1 GHz (Earth-to-space) and 18.8-19.3 GHz (space-to- Earth), which the Commission’s Ka-band plan allocates on a primary basis to NGSO operations. In accordance with Section 25.120, the earth stations will operate on a non-interference basis. The communications to be made under the STA will be used to test, validate, and demonstrate certain design features of LEO-i, including antenna tracking, RF performance, and end-to-end network performance. These operations will set the stage for providing highly innovative broadband services in the United States. Grant of Telesat’ s STA request, therefore, is in the public interest. Telesat is submitting, as Attachment 3 to this STA request, a detailed orbital debris assessment report prepared by NXTRAC for LEO 1, confirming compliance with U.S. government orbit lifetime and orbital debris mitigation regulations.2 A radiation hazard study for each earth station is provided in Attachment 2a and 2b hereto. FCC 17-147. Telesat’s PDR and the associated grant are hereby incorporated by reference. 2 In addition, Telesat’s orbital debris plan for LEO I has been reviewed by the Canadian licensing authority for the satellite, Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada, for compliance with the guidelines issued by the Inter-Agency Space Debris Coordination Committee and Telesat is required, by condition of license, to comply with these guidelines. 285099.00005/104109405.1

Telesat Canada Attachment 1 As indicated above, operations will be limited to the portions of the Ka-band in which NGSO operations have primary status. Accordingly, EPFD limits are inapplicable. Telesat will coordinate its STA operations with the U.S. federal government under footnote US3 343 of the United States Table of Frequency Allocations.4 Telesat will share ephemeris data in accordance with Section 25.146(e) of the Commission’s rules. With regard to matters of physical coordination, there are no operators using similar orbits. Accordingly, for good cause as shown herein, Telesat requests that the Commission grant Telesat’s STA request. Telesat has been having discussions with the Commission as to the applicability of US334 and is coordinating with the federal government out of an abundance of caution. “Telesat notes that it answered question El 8 in the Schedule B that is provided in Attachment 2a and 2b as “No” (i.e., that frequency coordination is not required) based on its understanding that the question relates to non-federal government coordination requirements, if any. 285099.00005/104109405.1

Telesat Canada Attachment 3 PREPARED FOR TELESAT IN SUPPORT OF THE LEO I SATELLITE ANALYSIS BY NXTRAC 11 APRIL2019 DOCUMENT DATA IS NOT RESTRICTED THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS NO PROPRIETARY, ITAR OR EXPORT CONTROLLED INFORMATION

NTRAC Revision History Revision Description of Revisions Release Date Initial Release Initial ODAR Report Format per NASA NASA-STD --- 10/02/201 8 8719.14 Revision A with Change I dated 8 Nov2011 1.1 Updates to incorporate analysis results 3/08/2019 NXTRAC Mission Analysts Dr. Darren D. Garber Jacqueline J. Eanes ODAR Analysis Tools NASA Debris Assessment Software (DAS) v2.1.1 NASA General Mission Analysis Tool (GMAT) R2018a NXTRAC 800 S. PCH Suite 8-247 Redondo Beach CA 90277 310-713-7301 2

MXTRA C Introduction This document provides a detailed orbital debris assessment report (ODAR) for the operations and disposal of the Telesat LEO 1 satellite. This ODAR provides an overview of current and planned LEO I operations and demonstrates compliance with all US Government orbit lifetime and orbital debris mitigation regulations. Telesat’s LEO I satellite was launched on 12 Jan 2018, as NORAD catalog identifier 43113, and is depicted in Figure 1. As of this report, the LEO I satellite has maneuvered to its final mission orbit; a 1000 km altitude circular orbit inclined at 99.5 Figure 1: Telesat LEO 1 degrees. Telesat’s LEO 1 satellite has a planned 3-year mission lifetime at which point the health of the satellite may be assessed for mission extension activities. If a viable mission extension is not possible, a sequence of planned disposal maneuvers will be performed over 3 to 6 months to allow atmospheric drag to ultimately remove the vehicle from orbit. For this analysis, a 165.5 kg small satellite with an initial area to mass ratio of 0.00513 m2/kg, was placed in a 1000 km altitude 99.5 degree inclined orbit for three years. Over the three year operational period the orbit evolves to 975 x 1025 km and will then be maneuvered to a final elliptical disposal orbit of 425 x 975 km. Its final mass at end of life is expected to be 127.9 kg with a corresponding increased area to mass ratio of 0.006646 m2/kg. From this final orbit and configuration, the decay and collision potential for LEO I were assessed with the precision NASA GMAT trajectory engine and the standard NASA DAS 2.1.1 toolset. Analysis of the LEO 1 mission operations and deorbit plan meets or exceeds all disposal and flight safety requirements with a decay timeline less than the 25 year maximum and a minimal collision probability (9e-5). NXTRAC 800 S. PCH Suite 8-247 Redondo Beach CA 90277 310-713-7301 3

NATRA C Summarized List of Compliance Status to Orbital Debris Requirements 4.3-1, Mission-Related Debris Passing Through LEO: COMPLIANT 4.3-2, Mission-Related Debris Passing Near GEO COMPLIANT 4.4-3, Limiting the long-term risk to other space systems from planned breakups: COMPLIANT 4.5-1 Probability of Collision with Large Objects: COMPLIANT 4.5-2, Probability of Damage from Small Objects: COMPLIANT 4.6-1, Disposal for space structures passing through LEO: COMPLIANT 4.6-2, Disposal for space structures passing through GEO: NIA 4.6-3, Disposal for space structures between LEO and GEO: N!A 4.7-1, Casualty Risk for Reentry Debris COMPLIANT 4.8-1, Collision Hazards of Space Tethers NIA NXTRAC 800 S. PCH Suite 8-247 Redondo Beach CA 90277 310-713-7301 4

NXTM C 1.0 Program Management & Mission Overview Program / Project Manager: Christian Vince Mission Description: LEO 1 was launched into lower orbit on January 12, 2018 and maneuvered into its final orbit of 1000 km altitude circular orbit inclined at 99.5 degrees over a period of several weeks. The satellite has a planned 3-year mission lifetime, during which it will be used for testing and demonstration. At the end of mission life, a sequence of maneuvers will be performed over 3 to 6 months to allow atmospheric draft to ultimately remove the vehicle from orbit through reentry. Foreign Government Involvement: Canada Project Milestones: Final mission orbit achieved — disposal operations begins NET 5 April 2021 Launch Date: 12 Jan 2018 Launch Vehicle: LEO 1 PSLV Launch Site: LEO 1 India Launch Vehicle Operator: LEO 1 India Mission Duration: 3 YEARS Mission Start: 5 April 2018 Launch / Deployment Profile: Launch Checkout Raise — 2 months Operations Post-mission Disposal: Maneuver to 425 x 975 km orbit, then NATURAL ORBITAL DECAY Selection of Orbit: Operations 1000 x 1000 km 99.5 degree, disposal 425 x 975 km Potential Physical Interference with other Orbiting Object: 9e-5 NXTRAC 800 S. PCH Suite 8-247 Redondo Beach CA 90277 310-713-7301 5

MXTRA C 2.0 Spacecraft Description Physical Description: PARAMETER VALUE Total Mass at Launch 165.5 kg Dry Mass at Launch 127.9 kg Form Factor Small Satellite Center of Mass 0.28 x 0.2$ x 0.55 m Envelope (stowed) 0.642 x 0.642 x 1.003 m Envelope (deployed) 0642 x 0.642 x 1.003 m Propulsion Systems Hydrazine Fluid Systems NONE AOCS 3-axis controlled ADCS unit consisting of sun-vector sensors, earth-horizon sensors, magnetometer, magnetorquers, and reaction wheels Range Safety I Pyrotechnic Devices NONE Electrical Generation SOLAR POWER Electrical Storage LITHIUM ION BATTERY Radioactive Materials NONE 1. Can spacecraft propellant and pressurant tanks be emptied at end of mission? YES 2. Can the spacecraft battery be disconnected from the charging circuit at end of mission? YES 3. If the answer to either of questions I and/or 2 is negative, what alternatives are available (bus modification or different bus) and at what additional, if any, cost? N/A 4. Have all mission-related debris generation been eliminated to the greatest extent possible? YES MXTRA C 800 S. PCH Suite 8-247 Redondo Beach CA 90277 310-713-7301 6

NXTRAC 5. For spacecraft operating in low Earth orbit (less than 2000 km), will the spacecraft reenter the atmosphere within 25 years after end of mission (and no more than 30 years after launch) or will the spacecraft be moved to a disposal orbit above 2000 km? YES LEO I will reenter the atmosphere within 25 years after end of mission - 6. For spacecraft operating in GEO, will the spacecraft be moved to a compliant disposal orbit, i.e., one which will remain at least 200 km (—125 mi) above/below GEO for at least 100 years? NIA 7. Will all launch vehicle orbital stages and mission-related debris be left in low Earth orbits with orbital lifetimes of less than 25 years or left in compliant disposal orbits above 2,000 km (—1,240 mi)? MIA rn iiri :s,p: 8. If an uncontrolled atmospheric reentry is anticipated after EOM, does the spacecraft bus or the payload contain any objects which might survive reentry, e.g., tanks, structural components, or other items made of high melting temperature materials such as titanium, beryllium, or stainless steel? YES but the small titanium tank poses less than 1:71200 hazard to human life - 9. If a disposal maneuver is planned for a mission not utilizing a controlled reentry, will the spacecraft propulsion system have a designed reliability of at least 0.9 at EOM? YES 10. Does the spacecraft have any critical components, other than sensors and solar cells, which are exposed to the environment without MMCD protection? NO NXTRAC 800 S. PCH Suite 8-247 Redondo Beach CA 90277 310-713-7301 7

NXTRAC 3.0 Assessment of Debris During Normal Operations Description: LEO I has been designed so that during its normal operation it will release no debris. The materials on the outside are tolerant of radiation and thermal cycling/mechanical fatigue to ensure no release of extraneous material. All critical components (e.g., computers and control devices) are built within the structure and shielded from external influences to ensure the spacecraft remains in full control from the ground. Objects larger than 1mm expected to be released during orbit: NONE Rationale for release of each object: NIA Time of release of each object: N/A Release velocity of each object: N/A Expected orbital parameters of each object: NIA Calculated orbital lifetime of each object: NIA Assessment of spacecraft compliance with Requirements 4.3-1 & 4.3-2: 4.3-1, Mission-Related Debris Passing Through LEO: COMPLIANT 4.3-2, Mission-Related Debris Passing Near GEO: COMPLIANT NXTR4C 800 S. PCH Suite 8-247 Redondo Beach CA 90277 310-713-7301 8

NXTRAC 4.0 Assessment of Spacecraft Intentional Breakups and Potential for Explosions Description: LEO 1 has been designed with redundancy considerations so that individual unit faults will not cause the loss of control of the spacecraft. Telesat has also taken specific precautions to pre-empt accidental explosions in orbit. All pressure vessels (pressurized propellant tanks, heat pipes, Lithium ion batteries etc.) on board have the appropriate structural margins to failure as per the MIL-Spec requirements used in the industry. All batteries and fuel tanks are monitored for pressure or temperature variations. The batteries are operated utilizing a redundant automatic recharging scheme. Doing so ensures that charging terminates normally without building up additional heat and pressure. Alarms in the Satellite Control Centre will inform controllers of any anomalous variations. Additionally, long-term trending analysis will be performed to monitor for any unexpected trends. On board fault protection will ensure the isolation of any affected units and their replacement with the back-up hardware/systems. As this process would occur within the spacecraft, it would also afford protection from command link failures (on the ground). Potential causes for spacecraft breakup: There are only two plausible causes for breakup of the satellites: • Failure of batteries • Mechanical failure of the reaction wheels Summary of failure modes and effects analysis of all credible failure modes which may lead to an accidental explosion: The battery pack complies with all controls / process requirements identified in NASA JSC-20793 Section 5.4.3 to mitigate the chance of any accidental venting / explosion caused from overcharging, over-discharging, internal shorts, and external shorts. The reaction wheels are contained within a sealed compartment to preclude release of debris from operating at a high angular rate or part failure. Additional risk mitigation strategies include limiting the maximum rate the wheels operate. Detailed Plan for any designed spacecraft breakup, including explosions and intentional collisions: There is no planned breakup of the satellite on-orbit. List of components passivated at EOM: At the end of mission, the wheels will be despun and the batteries will be set to only discharge. Rationale for all items required to be passivated that cannot be due to design: N/A NXTRAC 800 S. PCH Suite 8-247 Redondo Beach CA 90277 310-713-7301 9

NXTRAC Assessment of spacecraft compliance with Requirements 4.4-1 through 4.4-4: 4.4-1 Limiting the risk to other space systems from accidental explosions during COMPLIANT deployment and mission operations while in orbit about Earth or the Moon 4.4-2, Design for passivation after completion of mission operations while in orbit COMPLIANT about Earth or the Moon 4.4-3, Limiting the long-term risk to other space systems from planned breakups: COMPLIANT There are no planned breakups of any of the satellite. 4.4-4, Limiting the short-term risk to other space systems from planned breakups: COMPLIANT There are no planned breakups of any of the satellites. NXTRAC 800 S. PCH Suite 8-247 Redondo Beach CA 90277 310-713-7301 10

NX’TRAC 5.0 Assessment of Spacecraft Potential for On-Orbit Collisions Description: Telesat has been operating geostationary satellites for many years and performs station-keeping from the Telesat Satellite Control Centre in Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. Telesat also has experience in operating a non-geostationary LEO satellite. Specifically, since 2007 Telesat has been operating Radarsat-2 for MacDonald, Dettwiler and Associates Ltd. (MDA). Radarsat-2 is a LEO non-geostationary satellite at an altitude of 798 km. In order to protect against collision with other orbiting objects, Telesat shares daily ephemeris data with the Canadian Space Agency (CSA), the Combined Space Operations Center fCSpOC) (formerly the Joint Space Operations Center (JSpOC)), and the Space Data Center (SDC). These daily ephemeris updates have been tagged with both the CSpOC and the SDC as available to all operators for their space situational analysis. The CSpOC and the CSA provide notifications to Telesat for any object they see approaching a Telesat satellite including LEO 1, together with assessments of whether avoidance maneuvers are required, and Telesat maneuvers its satellites accordingly. For the LEO satellite Radarsat-2, Telesat works with the Canadian Space Agency to use Probability of Collision (PoC) analysis to determine the need for collision avoidance maneuvers. This system of highly effective PoC analysis is in use for LEO I operations and will be maintained for the entire mission and disposal phases. The PoC analysis provides a greater than 3 day notice of requirement of action for coordination of planned avoidance maneuvers, based on the normal accuracy of the CSpOC observations of the objects in the space catalog. Telesat has and will continue to coordinate with other non-geostationary satellite networks, such as it has with Iridium, to minimize the risk of collision between LEO I and any other NGSO satellite. To further limit the potential for collision, Telesat monitors new satellite launches to ensure that future satellites do not present a danger to LEO 1. LEO 1 has a propulsion system to maintain its orbit. The propulsion system on the satellite also enables it to make necessary maneuvers to avoid collision with any approaching object. Avoidance of other space objects will be achieved by the satellite firing its thrusters to adjust its position within its control box in order to avoid the other object. Coordination with other operators will aid this process. Probability for Collision with Objects >10cm: 9e-5 NXTRAC 800 S. PCH Suite 8-247 Redondo Beach CA 90277 310-713-7301 11

NXTRAC Assessment of spacecraft compliance with Requirement 45-1 and 45-2: 45-1, Probability of Collision with Large Objects: COMPLIANT 4.5-2, Probability of Damage from Small Objects: COMPLIANT NXTRAC 800 S. PCH Suite 8-247 Redondo Beach CA 90277 310-713-7301 12

NXTRAC 6.0 Assessment of Spacecraft Post-Mission Disposal Plans and Procedures Description: Telesat has been operating GSO satellites for more than 40 years during which multiple generations of its satellites have been retired and duly disposed of in the appropriate (graveyard) orbit to avoid adding debris to the GSO orbit. Telesat takes LEO orbital debris mitigation very seriously, as it plans to be a major operator of satellites in LEO orbits. Debris control and mitigation are stated requirements for Telesat spacecraft design specifications. Telesat has always met the requirements of the regulatory bodies and intends to continue to fully meet debris mitigation requirements. At the end of life, LEO 1 will be de-orbited by re-entering the satellite into the Earth’s atmosphere and burning. The de-orbiting has two phases. The first phase consists of the satellite being moved from its operational orbit to a planned lower orbit, the “Decaying Lower Orbit”. The second phase, the passive disposal phase, the satellite will be passivated and will burn up in the Earth’s atmosphere. First Phase De-Orbit: Decaying Lower Orbit In the first phase, the satellite will be moved from its operational orbit to a planned lower orbit, the ‘Decaying Lower Orbit”. The Decaying Lower Orbit for LEO I is a highly elliptical orbit of approximately 975 x 425 km. This orbit minimizes the time in the disposal orbit and the debris generation potential, for the fuel onboard. If more propellant is on board than is conservatively estimated, then the perigee will be lowered to its maximum extent to further decrease the duration of the passive disposal. The propellant needed to achieve the minimum de-orbit altitude is based on the change in velocity (delta-V) required. Telesat will carefully track propellant usage over the life of the LEO I satellite to ensure the satellite de-orbit is planned at a time that ensures this reserve of fuel is available, along with additional fuel margin to allow for uncertainties in propellant accounting, orbital determination and maneuver execution. Propellant tracking is accomplished using a bookkeeping method in accordance with industry standard. Using this method, the ground control station tracks the number of jet seconds utilized for station keeping, momentum control and other attitude control events. The amount of fuel used is determined from the number of jet seconds. This process, which is calibrated using data collected from thruster tests conducted on the ground, has been found to be accurate to within a few months of life on the satellite. In addition to bookkeeping updated based on orbital performance, Telesat will use in orbit thermal testing analysis and trending, as a cross check. Telesat is familiar with and has experience with all of the above cited methods. NXTRAC 800 S. ?CH Suite 8-247 Redondo Beach CA 90277 310-713-7301 13

NXTRAC Second Phase De-Orbit: Passive Disposal In the second phase, the passive disposal phase, all stored energy sources onboard the satellite will be removed by venting the remaining propellant and any remaining pressurant. All propulsion lines and latch valves will be vented and left open. All battery chargers will be turned off and batteries will be left in a permanent discharge state. All momentum storage devices will be switched off. These steps will ensure that no buildup of energy can occur and eliminate the risk of explosion after the satellite has stopped operating. Once the satellite is moved to this lower orbit, and passivated to a safe state, it will be left in the Decaying Lower Orbit which, within 25 years, will result in the re-entry of the satellite into the Earth’s atmosphere and burning of the satellite. Calculated for LEO 1, using the Decaying Lower Orbit of approximately 975 x 425 km, to deorbit its satellites, the NASA DAS program for the probability of collision with an object of greater than 10cm, with a mission duration of about 3 years plus approximately a 15 year passive disposal, the collision risk, is 0.00008. At the time of entry into disposal phase, Telesat will custom design disposal orbit parameters that minimize probability of collision with the International Space Station (ISS), other operational satellites and constellations. To pre-predict the requited parameters in advance is challenging, but Telesat is experienced in eccentricity and inclination collocation and probability of collision avoidance strategies. At this eccentricity, even a passive disposal strategy, with properly chosen argument of perigee and orbital parameters, will create significant separation. NXTRAC 800 S. PCH Suite 8-247 Redondo Beach CA 90277 310-713-7301 14

NXTRA C Following its maneuver to a lower perigee of 425 km, the satellites orbit will naturally decay until it reenters the atmosphere. Determining orbital decay timelines is challenging due to the complex interplay of the satellite’s initial orbital parameters (e.g. altitude, eccentricity and inclination), spacecraft mass, area, attitude profile (e.g. nadir facing, tumbling, gravity gradient) and atmospheric density as a function of solar and geomagnetic activity. Predicting the environment decades in the future results in a wide range of decay timelines depending on the level of activity assumed. To account for this atmospheric variability, 5000 Monte Carlo trials were performed to quantify the decay timeline distribution for LEO 1 as depicted in Figure 2. The simulation varied solar activity and atmospheric density per the DAS 2.1.1 current solar flux table. The 95th percentile for the decay timeline distribution is 8.25 years with 20 years representing the gggth percentile as shown in Figure 3 and 10 sigma from the mean. In Figure 4, a detailed 6.7 year (1 sigma) decay profile is depicted for the LEO I satellite. As can be seen in Figure 2, the LEO 1 satellite will deorbit well within 25 years once achieving its final 425 by 975 km disposal orbit. HISTOGRAM OF DECAY TIMELINES FOR LEO1 5000 MONTE CARLO TRIALS 1200 AVERAGE 4.99 YEARS MEDIAN 4.62 YEARS Sm DEV 1.65 YEARS F 6 D 0 DECAY TIMELINE (YEARS) Figure 2: Histogram of Monte Carlo Trials for LEO 1 Decay Timeline (5000 trials) NXTRAC 800 S. PCH Suite 8-247 Redondo Beach CA 90277 310-713-7301 15

NXTRAC PERCENTAGE OF TRIALS LESSTHAN 25 YEARS IN DURATION 100% 95% 90% 85% 80% 75% 70% 65% b 60% z 55% U 50% 45% U 40% 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% C N It C 1. C C C 4 It It It It C — C C ‘ 0 ‘4 I N It N N N N N DECAY TIMELINE (YEARS) Figure 3: Monte Carlo Trials of Decay Timeline by Percentile (5000 trials) NXTRAC 800 S. PCH Suite 8-247 Redondo Beach CA 90277 310-713-7301 16

NXTRAC 1200 1000 900 400 200 0 YEARS SINCE START OF DISPOSAL ORBIT PERIGEE APOGEE Figure 4: Nominal Orbital Decay Profile for Telesat LEO 1 Satellite Identification of Systems Required for Postmission Disposal: GNC, Communications and Propulsion Plan for Spacecraft Maneuvers required for Post-Mission Disposal: Lower perigee from 975 x 425km over 3 6 months with coordination with CSpOC and other mission management entities. Nominally 100 km per month with a minimum change in perigee altitude of 50 km and a maximum change in perigee altitude of 200 km. Calculation of final Area-to-Mass Ratio if Atmospheric Reentry Not Selected: NIA NXTRA C 800 S. PCH Suite 8-247 Redondo Beach CA 90277 310-713-7301 17

NXTRAC Assessment of Spacecraft Compliance with Requirements 4.6-1 through 4.64: 4.6-1, Disposal for space structures passing through LEO COMPLIANT All of the satellites will reenter the atmosphere within 25 years of mission completion and 30 years of launch. 4.6-2, Disposal for space structures passing through GEO: N/A 4.6-3, Disposal for space structures between LEO and GEO: NIA 4.6-4, Reliability of postmission disposal operations: NIA NXTRAC 800 S. PCH Suite 8-247 Redondo Beach CA 90277 310-713-7301 18

NTRAC 7.0 Assessment of Spacecraft Reentry Hazards Description: LEO 1 has been designed to ensure the probability of survival of spacecraft components through the re-entry into the Earth’s atmosphere is extremely limited. The design is consistent with requirement 4.7.-i of NASA-SID 8719.14- Process for Limiting Orbit Debris and has been assessed using NASA DAS (Debris Assessment Software) to ensure that the human casualty risk resulting from the de-orbiting of the satellites is less than 1 in 10,000, in accordance with the applicable guidelines. Detailed description of spacecraft components by size, mass, material, shape, and original location on the space vehicle: Subsystem Materials Quantity Mass (g) Size (mm) Propulsion Titanium Fuel Tank 1 5640 506 Summary of objects expected to survive an uncontrolled reentry (using DAS 2.1.1 software): None Calculation of probability of human casualty for expected reentry year and inclination: 1:71200 Assessment of spacecraft compliance with Requirement 4.7-1: 4.7-1, Casualty Risk from Reentry Debris: COMPLIANT 7.1 Assessment of Spacecraft Hazardous Materials Summary of Hazardous Materials Contained on Spacecraft: None 8.0 Assessment for Tether Missions NJTRAC 800 S. PCH Suite 8-247 Redondo Beach CA 90277 310-713-7301 19

NXTRAC Type of tether: N/A Description of tether system: N/A Determination of minimum size of object that will cause the tether to be severed: N/A Tether mission plan, including duration and postmission disposal: N/A Probability of tether colliding with large space objects: N/A Probability of tether being severed during mission or after postmission disposal: N/A Maximum orbital lifetime of a severed tether fragment: N/A Assessment of compliance with Requirement 4.8-1: 48-1, Cotlision Hazards of Space Tethers: N/A NXTRAC 800 S. PCH Suite 8-247 Redondo Beach CA 90277 310-713-7301 20

cz ‘- ‘- cy) N ‘-I N ‘-I N N Ca a) 0 0 a) N I,’ a) 0 a) 0 U, ci.. a) cA ci.0’ I 0 U) E c%i U) ‘-.1 U x a) -a) 0

NATMC #h lApogeePeilgee Altitude lllstaly W1Gh1 OrbitI 101 Apce Cdt = 00 14m I 102 PerIgeeAIt4200kmJ StrtYeat2021 OOyr hc.ntjon=9950de RAAN • 0.00 de9 ArgPen=0.00e9 881 teanAriornly = 0.00 de9 Area-To-Mass = 0007 mA2,19 - 3 . 391 8 2938 1959’ g79 --i.. -i-- ---- - 00 , —-----4 2021 0 20236 2026.1 2028.7 2031.3 2033.9 20364 Yeai Figure 6: DAS 2.1.1 Conservative Decay Profile NXTRAC 800 S. PCH Suite 8-247 Redondo Beach CA 90277 310-713-7301 22


Document Created: 2019-08-28 14:47:46
Document Modified: 2019-08-28 14:47:46
© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC