Attachment SESSTA2017100401102.

SESSTA2017100401102.

DECISION submitted by FCC

GRANT

0000-00-00

This document pretains to SES-STA-20171004-01102 for Special Temporal Authority on a Satellite Earth Station filing.

IBFS_SESSTA2017100401102_1295471

E030115 SES—STA—20171004—01102 1B2017002804 Hawaii Pacific Teleport, L.P. Approved by OMB 3060—0678 APPLICATION FOR EARTH STATION SPECIAL TEMPORARY AUTHORITY APPLICANT INFORMATIONEnter a description of this application to identify it on the main menu: E030115 STA (IOT Testing) 1. Applicant Name: Hawaii Pacific Teleport, L.P. Phone Number: 808—674—9157 DBA Name: Fax Number: 808—674—1826 Street: P.O. Box 693 E—Mail: Ismith—ryland@hawaiiteleport. com City: Rumson State: NJ Country: USA Zipcode: 07760 — Attention: Ms Leeana A Smith—Ryland File # SR ‘Q\\bk %n%@ C GmtDwM \_\ (or other 1dcnnfier) GRANTED International Bureau Approved o

Applicant: Hawaii Pacific Teleport, L.P. File No.: SES—STA—20171004—01102 Call Sign: E030115 Special Temporary Authority Hawaii Pacific Teleport, L.P. is granted a special temporary authority for 30 days, beginning October 15, 2017, to operate its C—band and Ku—band earth stations in Kapolei, Honolulu, Hawaii, to provide in—orbit testing ("IOT") services for Eutelsat 172B satellite at 176° E.L licensed by France, orbital location in the 3700—4200 MHz (H,V) and 12200— 12700 MHz (H,V) (space—to—Earth); and 5925—6425 MHz (H,V) and 14000—14500 MHz (H,V) (Earth—to—space) frequency bands, under the following conditions: 1. All operations under this grant of STA shall be on an unprotected and non—harmful interference basis. Hawaii Pacific Teleport L.P. shall not cause harmful interference to, and shall not claim protection from interference by any other lawfully operating radio communication system. 2. All operators of satellites in that path will be provided with an emergency phone number where the licensee can be reached in the event that harmful interference occurs. Currently the 24x7 contact information for the Eutelsat 172B operations contact Leeana Smith—Ryland at (917) 750—5358. 3. In the event of any harmful interference as a result of operations under this grant of special temporary authority, Hawaii Pacific Teleport, L.P, shall cease operations immediately upon notification of such interference and shall immediately inform the Commission, in writing, of such an event. 4. Grant of this authorization is without prejudice to any determination that the Commission may make regarding pending or future Hawaii Pacific Teleport‘s applications. 5. Any action taken or expense incurred as a result of operations pursuant to this special temporary authority is solely at Hawaii Pacific Teleport, L.P. risk. 6. This action is issued pursuant to Section 0.261 of the Commission‘s rules on delegated authority, 47 C.F.R. §0.261, and is effective immediately. GRANTED + International Bureau

2. Contact Name: Frank R. Jazzo, Esq Phone Number: 703—812—0470 Company: Fletcher, Heald & Hildreth, PLC Fax Number: 703—812—0486 Street: 1300 N 17th Street E—Mail: jazzo@fhhlaw.com 11th Floor City: Arlington State: VA Country: USA Zipcode: 22209 — Attention: Relationship: Legal Counsel (If your application is related to an application filed with the Commission, enter either the file number or the IB Submission ID of the related application. Please enter only one.) 3. Reference File Number or Submission ID 4a. Is a fee submitted with this application? @ If Yes, complete and attach FCC Form 159. If No, indicate reason for fee exemption (see 47 C.F.R.Section 1.1114). C Governmental Entity C Noncommercial educational licensee «74 Other(please explain): 4b, Fee Classification CGX — Fixed Satellite Transmit/Receive Earth Station 5. Type Request C Use Prior to Grant «:4 Change Station Location @ Other 6. Requested Use Prior Date 7. City 8. Latitude (dd mm ss.s h) 0 0 0.0

9. State 10. Longitude . (dd mm ss.s h) 0O 0 0.0 11. Please supply any need attachments. Attachment 1: STA Request Attachment 2: Sched B & Exhs Attachment 3: 12. Description. (If the complete description does not appear in this box, please go to the end of the form to view it in itsentirety.) This application requests special temporary authority to operate C—band and Ku—band earth stations on 176E to provide in—orbit testing services to support the E172B satellite. 13. By checking Yes, the undersigned certifies that neither applicant nor any other party to the application is Yes {}No subject to a denial of Federal benefits that includes FCC benefits pursuant to Section 5301 of the Anti—Drug Act of 1988, 21 U.S.C. Section 862, because of a conviction for possession or distribution of a controlled substance. See 47 CFR 1.2002(b) for the meaning of "party to the application" for these purposes. 14. Name of Person Signing 15. Title of Person Signing Leeana A. Smith—Ryland Chief Executive Officer WILLFUL FALSE STATEMENTS MADE ON THIS FORM ARE PUNISHABLE BY FINE AND / OR IMPRISONMENT (U.S. Code, Title 18, Section 1001), AND/OR REVOCATION OF ANY STATION AUTHORIZATION (U.S. Code, Title 47, Section 312(a)(1)), AND/OR FORFEITURE (U.S. Code, Title 47, Section 503).

FCC NOTICE REQUIRED BY THE PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT The public reporting for this collection of information is estimated to average 2 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the required data, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. If you have any comments on this burden estimate, or how we can improve the collection and reduce the burden it causes you, please write to the Federal Communications Commission, AMD—PERM, Paperwork Reduction Project (3060—0678), Washington, DC 20554. We will also accept your comments regarding the Paperwork Reduction Act aspects ofthis collection via the Internet if you send them to PRA@fce.gov. PLEASE DO NOT SEND COMPLETED FORMS TO THIS ADDRESS. Remember — You are not required to respond to a collection of information sponsored by the Federal government, and the government may not conduct or sponsor this collection, unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number or if we fail to provide you with this notice. This collection has been assigned an OMB control number of 3060—0678. THE FOREGOING NOTICE IS REQUIRED BY THE PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT OF 1995, PUBLIC L&AW 104—13, OCTOBER 1, 1995, 44 U.S.C. SECTION 3507.

STA Request E030115 Hawaii Pacific Teleport (HPT) requests special temporary authority ("STA") to operate the subject C—band and Ku—band earth stations to provide in—orbit testing ("IOT") services for certain C—band and Ku—band transponders on the recently launched EUTELSAT 172B ("E172B") satellite‘ at the 176° E.L. orbital location. HPT requests this STA for the period of October 15, 2017 to November 15, 2017. E172B is designed as a replacement for the EUTELSAT 172A ("E172A") satellite at 172° E.L. and the subject transponders will be operated at its final location by ES 172 LLC, an indirect subsidiary of Eutelsat, S.A. (collectively, "Eutelsat") (see FCC File No. SAT—RPL— 20170927—00136). The information provided in Eutelsat‘s replacement satellite application is hereby incorporated by reference. The subject earth stations will test E172B‘s C—band and Ku—band functionality in the 5925—6425 MHz (Earth—to—space) and 3700—4200 MHz (space—to—Earth) bands, and the 14.0—14.5 GHz (Earth—to—space) and 10.95—11.20 GHz, 11.45—11.7 GHz and 12.20—12.75 GHz (space—to— Earth) bands. HPT understands that, based on Eutelsat‘s analysis and consultations with potentially affected parties, there is no reason to conclude that E172B‘s temporary IOT operations in these bands at 176° E.L. will raise interference or other concerns. Nonetheless, to the extent harmful interference may occur, HPT commits to modifying or suspending its earth ‘ EUTELSAT 172B launched under authority granted by France pursuant to the well—settled licensing processes of that nation and will arrive shortly at its IOT location. Because France is a WTO member nation, there is a presumption in favor of granting market access to allow U.S. earth stations to communicate with French—licensed satellites (assuming compliance with other applicable Commission rules and policies). {fon101919—1 }

station transmissions to resolve such interference. Thus, HPT acknowledges that its earth station operations will be conducted on an unprotected, non—harmful interference basis. After IOT, the E172B satellite will be located at 172° E.L. to support long—term service throughout the Asia—Pacific region, including Ku—band mobility applications, as indicated in the above—referenced replacement satellite application and an STA request filed by Panasonic Avionics to access the satellite (see FCC File No. SES—STA—INTR2017—02798). This request for short—term earth station operating authority to support IOT for E172B is eséential to ensure proper functioning of the satellite and permit the near—term transition of traffic from E172A. Attached is an Exhibit 1 — Technical Exhibit (Schedule B of Form 312) — detailing the requested operating parameters for IOT on the C—band and Ku—band operations. Attached as Exhibits 2 and 3 are Radiation Hazard Reports for IOT on the C—band and Ku—band operations. Attached as Exhibit 4 are Frequency Coordination Reports for IOT earth station operations. {01101919—1 }

Page 1: Location g&ge 312 FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR SATELLITE SPACE AND EARTH STATION AUTHORIZATIONS Technical and Operational Description) (Place an "X" in one of the blocks below) STA Request B1. Location of Earth Station Site. If temporary—fixed, mobile, or VSAT remote facility, specify area of operation and point of contact. If VSAT hub station, give its location For VSAT networks attach individual Schedule B, Page 1 sheets for each hub station and each remote station. Individually provide the Location, Points of Communications, and Destination Points for each hub and remote station. Bla. Station Call Sign B1b. Site identifier (HUB, REMOTE1, etc.) B1c. Telephone Number B1j. Geographic Coordinates N/S, B1k. Lat./Lon. E030115 (917)—750—5358 Deg. — Min. — Sec. — E/W Coordinates are: B1d. Mailing Street Address of Station or Area of Operation Ble. Name of Contact Person 91—340 Farrington Highway Leeana A. Smith—Ryland Lat 21° — 20‘ —8.9" N. [_] nap27 o 7 m Lon 158°—05‘ —17.8" W. NAD—83 B1f. City Big. County Blh. State B1i. Zip Code B1l. Site Elevation (AMSL) Kapolei Honolulu HI 96707 36.58 B2. Points of Communications: List the names and orbit locations of all satellites with which this earth station will communicate. The entry "ALSAT" is sufficient to identify the names and locations of all satellite facilities licensed by the U.S. All non—U.S. licensed satellites must be listed individually. Satellite Name and Orbit Location Satellite Name and Orbit Location Satellite Name and Orbit Location Eutelsat 172B at 176° E.L. for IOT testing B3. Destination points for communications using non—U.S. licensed satellites. For each non—U.S. licensed satellite facility identified in section B2 above, specify the destination point(s) (countries) where the services will be provided by this earth station via each non—U.S. license satellite system. Use additional sheets as needed. Satellite Name List of Destination Points Eutelsat 176 E IOT testing B4. Earth Station Antenna Facilities: Use additional pages as needed. (a) Site ID* (b) (c) ' (d) Manufacturer (e) Model (£) (g) Antenna Gain Antenna ID** Quantity Antenna Size Transmit and/or Receive {meters) ‘C dBi at GHz) 4.5M 1 Andrew Corp ESA45 4.5M 44.0 dBi @ 4 GHz ’ 47.1 dBi @ 6 GHz 4.8M 1 Vertex KPK 4.8M 53.0 dBi @12 GHz 55.0 dBi@ 14.25 GHz FCC 312, Schedule B — Page 1 of 5

BS. Antenna Heights and Maximum Power Limits: (The corresponding Antenna ID in tables B4 and B5 applies to the same antenna) Maximum Antenna Height (¢) Building (f) Maximum (g) Total Input (a) (b) Antenna Structure (c) Above (d) Above Height Above Antenna Height Power at (h) Total EIRP Antenna Registration No. Ground Level Mean Sea Level Ground Level Above Rooftop antenna flange for all carriers ID** (meters) (meters) (meters)*** (meters)*** (Watts) (dBW) 4.5M 5.0 41.58 N/A N/A 180 69.65 4.8M 5.8 42.4 N/A N/A 180 77.55 B6. Frequency Coordination Limits: Use additional pages as needed. (a) (b) (c) Range of (d) Range of (e) Antenna (f) Antenna (g) Earth Station (h) Earth Station (i) Maximum EIRP Antenna ID* Frequency Limits Satellite Arc Satellite Arc Elevation Angle Elevation Angle Azimuth Angle Azimuth Angle Density toward the (MHz) Eastern Limit** Western Limit** Eastern Limit Western Limit Eastern Limit Western Limit Horizon (dBW/AkHz) 4.5M 3700.00 — 4200.00 176.0°E.L. 176.0° E.L. 51.5° 51.5° 233.2° 233.2° 4.5M 5925.00 — 6425.00 176.0°E.L. 176.0° W .L. 51.5° 51.5° 233.2° 233.2° 20.3 4.8M 12200.00 — 12700.00 176.0°E.L. 176.0° E.L. 51.5° 51.5° 233.2° 233.2° 4.8M 14000.00 — 14500.00 176.0°E.L. 176.0° W .L. 51.5° 51.5° 233.2° 233.2° —20.3 (a) (b) (c) (d) Antenna (e) (£) Maximum (g) Maximum (h) Description of Modulation and Services Antenna ID* Frequency Limits T/R Polarization Emission EIRP per EIRP Density (MHz) Mode (H,V,L,R) Designator Carrier (dBW) per Carrier ** (dBW/4kHz) — 4.5M 3700.00 — 4200.00 R HV 36M0G7W Digital Data, Various FEC, Various Mod., Various Information 4.5M 3700.00 —— 4200.00 R HV T2MOGZW Digital Data, Various FEC, Various Mod., Various Information 4.5M 5925.00 — 6425.00 T H.V 36M0G7W 66.64 27.1 Digital Data, Various FEC, Various Mod., Various Information 4.5M 5925.00 — 6425.00 T H,V 72M0G7W 69.65 27.1 Digital Data, Various FEC, Various Mod., Various Information 4.8M 12200.00 — 12700.00 R HV 36M0G7W Digital Data, Various FEC, Various Mod., Various Information 4.8M 12200.00 — 12700.00 R H.V 72M0OGTW Digital Data, Various FEC, Various Mod., Various Information 4.8M 14000.00 — 14500.00 T HV 36M0G7W 74.54 35.0 Digital Data, Various FEC, Various Mod., Various Information 4.8M 14000.00 — 14500.00 T H.V 72M0G7ZW 77.55 35.0 Digital Data, Various FEC, Various Mod., Various Information FCC 312, Schedule B — Page 2 of 5

B8. If the proposed antenna(s) operate in the Fixed Satellite Service (FSS) with geostationary satellites, do(es) the proposed antenna(s) comply with the antenna gain patterns specified in Section 25.209(a) and (b) as demonstrated by the manufacturer‘s qualification E} YES D NO measurements? _If NO, provide as an exhibit, a technical analysis showing compliance with two—degree spacing policy. B9. If the proposed antenna(s) do not operate in the Fixed Satellite Service (FSS), or if they operate in the Fixed Satellite Service (FSS) with non—geostationary satellites, do(es) the proposed antenna(s) comply with the antenna gain patterns specified in D YES N/A D NO Section 25.209(a2) and (b) as demonstrated by the manufacturer‘s qualification measurement? B10. Is the facility operated by remote control? If YES, provide the location and telephone number of the control point. [_] ¥Es NO Remote Control Point Location: B1Oa. Street Address B1Ob. City Bi0c. County B1Q0.d. State/Country B10e. Zip Code B10f. Telephone Number B10g. Call Sign of Control Station (if appropriate) B11. Is frequency coordination required? If YES, attach a frequency coordination report as an exhibit. YES [_] NO B12. Is coordination with another country required? If YES, attach the name of the country(ies) and plot of coordination contours as an exhibit. D YES NO B13. FAA Notification — (See 47 CFR Part 17and 47 CFR Part 25.113(c)) Where FAA notification is required, have you attached a copy of a completed FCC Form 854 [] vEs NO and/or the FAA‘s study regarding the potential hazard of the structure to aviation? EXISTING FACILITY FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH 47 CFR PARTS 17 AND 25 WILL RESULT IN THE RETURN OF THIS APPLICATION FCC 312, Schedule B — Page 3 of 5

FREQUENCY COORDINATION AND INTERFERENCE ANALYSIS REPORT Prepared for Hawaii Pacific Teleport, L.P. KAPOLEI, HI Satellite Earth Station Prepared By: COMSEARCH 19700 Janelia Farm Boulevard Ashburn, VA 20147 August 31, 2017

TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. CONCLUSIONS 12.22020222002002vverrrtstrerressrerersrrrersesersecavrerriresserserrseerressersisisrereressireerrsiseerersesersirresasrerrerrerrrrearrnes 3 2, SUMMARY OF RESULTS ..2..00000000022rvasrveersvresrsestsrerserserisrrrsvserirresereereariserrrsreeserssereesseseeereerrrerseerereeererereereves 4 3. SUPPLEMENTAL SHOWING 112222 2222020000000srvverretarrrrrirrerireesrerererrrererrrrrisrerernrseererecerrersrrerererrrrasererrrererererarer ies 5 4. EARTH STATION COORDINATION DATAL.,.2202 0000002202 rer es rrrererrarserserrerrererrererrerrareerererrarerrrersrrrrsarrerererrerres 6 5. CERTIFICATION ..2200000202022azrrreresererersrreserrsrrreseserererrertrrrrssireserereiresrrerertrrrsresrereerisreresseerrrverrerrreerrerrrerrerr en es 10 Frequency Coordination and Interference Analysis Report 08/31/2017 Page 2 of 10

1. CONCLUSIONS An interference study considering all existing, proposed and prior coordinated microwave facilities within the coordination contours of the proposed earth station demonstrates that this site will operate satisfactorily with the common carriere microwave environment. Further, there will be no restrictions of its operation due to interference considerations. Frequency Coordination and Interference Analysis Report 08/31/2017 Page 3 of 10

2. SUMMARY OF RESULTS A number of great circle interference cases were identified during the interference study of the proposed earth station. Each of the cases, which exceeded the interference objective on a line—of—sight basis, was profiled and the propagation losses estimated using NBS TN101 (Revised) techniques. The losses were found to be sufficient to reduce the signal levels to acceptable magnitudes in every case. The following companies reported potential great circle interference conflicts that did not meet the objectives on a line—of—sight basis. When over—the—horizon losses are considered on the interfering paths, sufficient blockage exists to negate harmful interference from occurring with the proposed transmit—receive earth station. Company Hawail State No other carriers reported potential interference cases. Frequency Coordination and Interference Analysis Report 08/31/2017 Page 4 of 10

3. SUPPLEMENTAL SHOWING Pursuant to Part 25.203(c) of the FCC Rules and Regulations, the satellite earth station proposed in this application was coordinated by Comsearch using computer techniques and in accordance with Part 25 of the FCC Rules and Regulations. A temporary earth station coordination was conducted with the below listed carriers. Revised data was forwarded on 08/31/2017. Company AT&T Corp. Federal Communication Commission Hawaii State Hawaiian Electric Company, Inc Hawaiian Telcom, Inc. Honolulu City & County Dept of Info Tech Maui, County of NEXSTAR BROADCASTING, INC. New Cingular Wireless PCS LLC — Hawaii University of Hawaii Frequency Coordination and Interference Analysis Report 08/31/2017 Page 5 of 10

4. EARTH STATION COORDINATION DATA This section presents the data pertinent to frequency coordination of the proposed earth station that was circulated to all carriers within its coordination contours. Frequency Coordination and Interference Analysis Report 08/31/2017 Page 6 of 10

COMSEARCH Earth Station Data Sheet 19700 Janelia Farm Boulevard, Ashburn, VA 20147 {(703)726—5500 http://www.comsearch.com Date: 08/31/2017 Job Number: 170831COMSTCO3 Administrative Information Status TEMPORARY (Operation from 10/01/2017 to 04/01/2018) Call Sign E030115 Licensee Name Hawaii Pacific Teleport, L.P. Site Information KAPOLEI, HI Latitude (NAD 83) 21° 20‘ 8.9" N Longitude (NAD 83) 158° 5‘ 17.8" W Climate Zone A Rain Zone 4 Ground Elevation (AMSL) 36.58 m / 120.0 ft Link Information Satellite Type Geostationary Mode TR — Transmit—Receive Modulation Digital Satellite Arc 184° W to 184° West Longitude same as 176° W to 1764° East Longitude Azimuth Range 233.2° to 233.2° Corresponding Elevation Angles —51.5° / 51.5° Antenna Centerline (AGL) 3.0 m / 9.8 ft Antenna Information Receive Transmit Manufacturer Andrew Corp Andrew Corp Gain / Diameter 44.0 dBi / 4.5 m 47.1 dBi / 4.5 m 3—dB / 15—dB Beamwidth 0.80° / 1.60° 0.40° / 0.80° s6MOGW — Z2MOGTW Max Available RF Power (dBW/4 kHz) —20.0 —20.0 (dBW/MHz) 4.0 4.0 Maximum EIRP (dBW/A kHz) 27.1 271 (dBW/MHz) 51.1 511 (dBW) 66.64 69.65 Interference Objectives: Long Term —156.0 dBW/MHz 20% —154.0 dBW/4 kHz 20% Short Term —146.0 dBW/MHz 0.01% —131.0 dBW/4 kHz 0.0025% Frequency Information Receive 4.0 GHz Transmit 6.1 GHz Emission / Frequency Range (MHz) 36MOG7W — 72M0G7ZW / 3700.0 — 4200.0 36MOGTW — 72M0G7W / 5925.0 — 6425.0 Max Great Circle Coordination Distance 285.3 km / 177.2 mi 117.1 km / 72.7 mi Precipitation Scatter Contour Radius 100.0 km / 62.1 mi 100.0 km / 62.1 mi Frequency Coordination and Interference Analysis Report 08/31/2017 Page 7 of 10

COMSEARCH Earth Station Data Sheet 19700 Janelia Farm Boulevard, Ashburn, VA 20147 (703)726—5500 http://www.comsearch.com Coordination Values KAPOLEI, HI Licensee Name Hawaii Pacific Teleport, L.P. Latitude (NAD 83) 21° 20‘ 8.9" N Longitude (NAD 83) 158° 5‘ 17.8" W Ground Elevation (AMSL) 36.58 m / 120.0 ft Antenna Centerline (AGL) 3.0 m / 9.8 ft Antenna Mode Receive 4.0 GHz Transmit 6.1 GHz Interference Objectives: Long Term —156.0 dBW/MHz 20% —154.0 dBW/4 kHz 20% Short Term —146.0 dBW/MHz 0.01% —131.0 dBW/4 kHz 0.0025% Max Available RF Power —20.0 (dBW/4 kHz) Receive 4.0 GHz Transmit 6.1 GHz Horizon Antenna Horizon Coordination Horizon Coordination Azimuth (°) Elevation (°) Discrimination (°) Gain (dBi) Distance (km) Gain (dBi) Distance (km) 0 9.64 116.51 —~10.00 100.00 —10.00 100.00 5 9.59 119.75 —10.00 100.00 —10.00 100.00 10 10.66 123.48 —10.00 100.00 —10.00 100.00 15 10.24 126.22 —10.00 100.00 —10.00 100.00 20 10.74 129.34 —10.00 100.00 —10.00 100.00 25 < 11.24 132.27 —10.00 100.00 —10.00 100.00 30 11.57 134.82 —10.00 100.00 —10.00 100.00 35 11.13 136.36 ~10.00 100.00 —10.00 100.00 40 11.22 137.96 —10.00 100.00 —10.00 100.00 45 9.95 137.79 —10.00 100.00 —10.00 100.00 50 9.28 137.67 —10.00 100.00 —10.00 100.00 55 8.75 137.21 —10.00 100.00 —10.00 100.00 60 7.56 135.63 —10.00 108.35 —10.00 100.00 65 6.87 134.14 —10.00 115.73 —10.00 100.00 70 5.81 131.95 —10.00 127.00 —10.00 100.00 75 4.94 129.65 —10.00 134.41 —10.00 100.00 . 80 0.00 123.74 —10.00 285.28 —10.00 117.07 85 0.00 121.92 —10.00 285.28 —10.00 117.07 90 0.30 120.09 —10.00 272.92 ~10.00 109.07 95 0.00 117.63 —10.00 285.28 —10.00 117.07 100 0.00 115.20 —10.00 285.28 —10.00 117.07 105 0.00 112.62 —10.00 285.28 ~10.00 117.07 110 0.00 109.91 —10.00 285.28 —10.00 117.07 115 0.00 107.09 —10.00 285.28 —10.00 117.07 120 0.00 104.17 —10.00 285.28 —10.00 117.07 125 0.00 101.19 —10.00 285.28 —10.00 117.07 130 0.00 98.15 —10.00 285.28 —10.00 117.07 135 0.00 — 95.07 —10.00 285.28 —10.00 117.07 140 0.00 91.97 —10.00 285.28 —10.00 117.07 145 0.00 88.86 —10.00 285.28 —10.00 117.07 150 0.00 85.75 —10.00 285.28 —10.00 117.07 155 0.00 82.67 —10.00 _ 285.28 . —10.00 117.07 160 0.00 79.62 —10.00 285.28 —10.00 117.07 165 0.00 76.62 —10.00 285.28 —10.00 117.07 170 0.00 73.69 —10.00 285.28 —10.00 117.07 175 0.00 70.84 —10.00 285.28 —10.00 117.07 180 0.00 68.09 —10.00 285.28 —10.00 117.07 185 0.00 65.48 —10.00 285.28 —10.00 117.07 Frequency Coordination and Interference Analysis Report 08/31/2017 Page 8 of 10

COMSEARCH Earth Station Data Sheet 19700 Janelia Farm Boulevard, Ashburn, VA 20147 (703)726—5500 http://www.comsearch.com Coordination Values KAPOLEI, Hi Licensee Name Hawaii Pacific Teleport, LP. Latitude (NAD 83) 21° 20‘ 8.9" N Longitude (NAD 83) 158° 5‘ 17.8" W Ground Elevation (AMSL) 36.58 m / 120.0 ft Antenna Centerline (AGL) 3.0 m / 9.8 ft Antenna Model FCC Reference 32—25L.O0G(THETA) Antenna Mode Receive 4.0 GHz Transmit 6.1 GHz Interference Objectives: Long Term —156.0 dBwW/MHz 20% —154.0 dBW/4 kHz 20% Short Term —146.0 dBW/MHz 0.01% —131.0 dBW/4 kHz 0.0025% Max Available RF Power —20.0 (dBW/4 kHz) Receive 4.0 GHz Transmit 6.1 GHz Horizon Antenna Horizon Coordination Horizon Coordination Azimuth (°) Elevation (°) Discrimination (°) Gain (dBi) Distance (km) Gain (dBi) Distance (km) 190 0.00 63.00 —10.00 285.28 —10.00 117.07 195 0.00 60.71 —10.00 285.28 —10.00 117.07 200 0.00 58.60 —10.00 285.28 —10.00 117.07 205 0.00 56.73 —10.00 285.28 —10.00 117.07 210 0.00 55.10 —10.00 285.28 —10.00 117.07 215 0.00 53.75 —10.00 285.28 —10.00 117.07 220 0.00 52.70 —10.00 285.28 —10.00 117.07 225 0.00 51.97 —10.00 285.28 —10.00 117.07 230 0.00 51.58 —10.00 285.28 —10.00 117.07 235 0.00 51.53 —10.00 285.28 —10.00 117.07 240 0.00 51.83 —10.00 285.28 —10.00 117.07 245 0.00 52.47 —10.00 285.28 —10.00 117.07 250 0.00 53.44 —10.00 285.28 —10.00 117.07 255 0.00 54.71 —10.00 285.28 —10.00 117.07 260 0.00 56.26 —10.00 285.28 —10.00 117.07 265 0.00 58.08 —10.00 285.28 —10.00 117.07 270 0.00 60.12 —10.00 285.28 —10.00 117.07 275 0.00 62.37 —10.00 285.28 —10.00 117.07 280 0.26 64.64 ~10.00 277.38 —10.00 111.98 285 0.25 67.25 —10.00 279.15 —10.00 113.13 290 0.54 69.85 —10.00 247.41 —10.00 100.00 295 0.87 72.58 —10.00 227.28 —10.00 100.00 300 1.61 — 75.32 —10.00 205.12 —10.00 100.00 305 2.28 78.25 —10.00 188.12 —10.00 100.00 310 4.38 81.08 —10.00 142.13 —10.00 100.00 315 5.69 84.32 —10.00 128.18 —10.00 100.00 320 7.82 87.71 —10.00 105.65 —10.00 100.00 325 8.98 91.35 —10.00 100.00 —10.00 100.00 330 9.31 95.05 —10.00 100.00 —10.00 100.00 335 9.85 98.81 —10.00 100.00 —10.00 100.00 340 9.51 102.43 —10.00 100.00 —10.00 100.00 345 9.51 106.04 —10.00 100.00— —10.00 100.00 350 9.50 109.59 —10.00 100.00 —10.00 100.00 355 9.45 113.05 —10.00 100.00 —10.00 100.00 Frequency Coordination and Interference Analysis Report 08/31/2017 Page 9 of 10

5. CERTIFICATION 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I AM THE TECHNICALLY QUALIFIED PERSON RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PREPARATION OF THE FREQUENCY COORDINATION DATA CONTAINED IN THIS APPLICATION, THAT | AM FAMILIAR WITH PARTS 101 AND 25 OF THE FCC RULES AND REGULATIONS, THAT | . HAVE EITHER PREPARED OR REVIEWED THE FREQUENCY COORDINATION DATA SUBMITTED WITH THIS APPLICATION, AND THAT IT IS COMPLETE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. f ? f LP u sifes / Timothy 0. Crutcher Frequency Planner COMSEARCH 19700 Janelia Farm Boulevard Ashburn, VA 20147 DATED: August 31, 2017 Frequency Coordination and Interference Analysis Report 08/31/2017 Page 10 of 10

FREQUENCY COORDINATION AND INTERFERENCE ANALYSIS REPORT Prepared for Hawaii Pacific Teleport, L.P. KAPOLEI, HI Satellite Earth Station Prepared By: COMSEARCH 19700 Janelia Farm Boulevard Ashburn, VA 20147 August 31, 2017 CONCLUSIONS & SUMMARY OF RESULTS There were no great circle interference cases identified during the interference study of the proposed earth station. SUPPLEMENTAL SHOWING There were no great circle interference cases identified during the interference study of the proposed earth station. No carriers were identified in this band.

EARTH STATION COORDINATION DATA This section presents the data pertinent to the earth station. Date: 08/31/2017 Job Number: 170831COMSTCO4 Administrative Information Call Sign E030115 Licensee Name Hawaii Pacific Teleport, L.P. Site Information KAPOLEI, HI Latitude (NAD 83) 21° 20‘ 8.9" N Longitude (NAD 83) 158° 5 17.8" W Climate Zone A Rain Zone 4 Ground Elevation (AMSL) 36.58 m / 120.0 ft Link Information Satellite Type Geostationary Mode RO — Receive—Only Modulation Digital Satellite Arc 83° W to 194° West Longitude Azimuth Range 95.5° to 243.3° Corresponding Elevation Angles 5.2°/42.6° Antenna Centerline (AGL) 5.2 m / 17.1 ft Antenna Information Receive Manufacturer Vertex Gain / Diameter 53.0 dBi / 4.8 m 3—dB / 15—dB Beamwidth 0.34° / 0.68° Interference Objectives: Long Term —156.0 dBwW/MHz 20% Short Term —146.0 dBW/MHz 0.01% Frequency Information Receive 12.2 GHz Emission / Frequency Range (MHz) 36M0GZW / 12200.0 — 12700.0 72M0GTW / 12200.0 — 12700.0 Max Great Circle Coordination Distance 551.8 km / 342.9 mi Precipitation Scatter Contour Radius 418.1 km / 259.7 mi Timothy 0. Crutcher Frequency Planner COMSEARCH 19700 Janelia Farm Boulevard Ashburn, VA 20147 DATED: August 31, 2017

Radiation Hazard Report Page 1 of 5 Analysis of Non—lonizing Radiation for a 4.5—MeterEarth Station System This report analyzes the non—ionizing radiation levels for a 4.5—meter earth station system. The analysis and calculations performed in this report comply with the methods described in the FCC Office of Engineering and Technology Bulletin, No. 65 first published in 1985 and revised in 1997 in Edition 97—01. The radiation safety limits used in the analysis are in conformance with the FCC R&O 96—326. Bulletin No. 65 and the FCC R&O specifies that there are two separate tiers of exposure limits that are dependant on the situation in which the exposure takes place and/or the status of the individuals who are subject to the exposure. The Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) limits for persons in a General Population/Uncontrolled environment are shown in Table 1. The General Population/Uncontrolled MPE is a function of transmit frequency and is for an exposure period of thirty minutes or less. The MPE limits for persons in an Occupational/Controlled environment are shown in Table 2. The Occupational MPE is a function of transmit frequency and is for an exposure period of six minutes or less. The purpose of the analysis described in this report is to determine the power flux density levels of the earth station in the far—field, near—field, transition region, between the subreflector or feed and main reflector surface, at the main reflector surface, and between the antenna edge and the ground and to compare these levels to the specified MPEs. Table 1. Limits for General Population/Uncontrolled Exposure (MPE) Frequency Range (MHz) __Power Density (mW/cm*) 30—300 0.2 300—1500 Frequency (MHz)*(0.8/1200) 1500—100,000 1.0 Table 2. Limits for Occupational/Controlled Exposure (MPE) Frequency Range (MHz) Power Density (mW/icm*) 30—300 1.0 300—1500 Frequency (MHz)*(4.0/1200) 1500—100,000 5.0 Table 3. Formulas and Parameters Used for Determining Power Flux Densities Parameter Symbol Formula Value Units Antenna Diameter D Input 4.5 m Antenna Surface Area Asurface 1x D/ 4 15.90 m* Subreflector Diameter Dsr Input 60.5 cm Area of Subreflector Asr x Ds, *4 2874.75 cm* Frequency F Input 6175 MHz Wavelength A 300 / F 0.048583 m Transmit Power P Input 180.00 W Antenna Gain (dBi) Ges Input 47.1 dBi Antenna Gain (factor) G 10°°""° 51286.1 n/a Pi Tt Constant 3.1415927 n/a Antenna Efficiency m 6/(rD") 0.61 n/a

Radiation Hazard Report Page 2 of 5 1. Far Field Distance Calculation The distance to the beginning of the far field can be determined from the following equation: Distance to the Far Field Region Rg = 0.60 D/A (1) = 250.1 m The maximum main beam power density in the far field can be determihed from the following equation: . On—Axis Power Density in the Far Field S¢ GP/(4 1 R;*) (2) dP 11.746 W/im* 1175 mW/icm* 1P 2. Near Field Calculation Power flux density is considered to be at a maximum value throughout the entire length of the defined Near Field region. The region is contained within a cylindrical volume having the same diameter as the antenna. Past the boundary of the Near Field region, the power density from the antenna decreases linearly with respect to increasing distance. The distance to the end of the Near Field can be determined from the following equation: Extent of the Near Field Ry = D/ (4 ) (3) = 104.2 m The maximum power density in the Near Field can be determined from the following equation: Near Field Power Density Sar = 16.0 7 P / (r D) (4) = 27.420 W/im* = 2.742 mWicm* 3. Transition Region Calculation The Transition region is located between the Near and Far Field regions. The power density begins to decrease linearly with increasing distance in the Transition region. While the power density decreases inversely with distance in the Transition region, the power density decreases inversely with the square of the distance in the Far Field region. The maximum power density in the Transition region will not exceed that calculated for the Near Field region. The power density calculated in Section 1 is the highest power density the antenna can produce in any of the regions away from the antenna. The power density at a distance R, can be determined from the following equation: Transition Region Power Density S =Sna Rn/ R (5) = 2.742 mWicm*

Radiation Hazard Report Page 3 of 5 Region between the Main Reflector and the Subreflector Transmissions from the feed assembly are directed toward the subreflector surface, and are reflected back toward the main reflector. The most common feed assemblies are waveguide flanges, horns or subreflectors. The energy between the subreflector and the reflector surfaces can be calculated by determining the power density at the subreflector surface. This can be determined from the following equation: Power Density at the Subreflector Ss;r = 4000 P / Ag; (6) = 250.456 mW/icm* 4. Main Reflector Region The power density in the main reflector is determined in the same manner as the power density at the subreflector. The area is now the area of the main reflector aperture and can be determined from the following equation: Power Density at the Main Reflector Surface Ssurtace 7 4 P / Asurface (7) = 45.271 W/im* = 4.527 mWicm* 5. Region between the Main Reflector and the Ground Assuming uniform illumination of the reflector surface, the power density between the antenna and the ground can be determined from the following equation: Power Density between Reflector and Ground Sq o P / Asurface (8) 11.318 W/im" HooH 1.132 mW/iem*

Radiation Hazard Report . Page 4 of 5 6. Summary of Calculations Table 4. Summary of Expected Radiation levels for Uncontrolled Environment Calculated Maximum Radiation Power Density Level Region (mW/cm*) Hazard Assessment 1. Far Field (Rg= 250.1 m) S¢ 1.175 Potential Hazard 2. Near Field (R,; = 104.2 m) Snf 2.742 Potential Hazard 3. Transition Region (Ry; < R, < Rg) St 2.742 Potential Hazard 4. Between Main Reflector and Ser 250.456 Potential Hazard Subreflector 5. Main Reflector Ssurface 4.527 Potential Hazard 6. Between Main Reflector and Ground Sq 1.132 Potential Hazard Table 5. Summary of Expected Radiation levels for Controlled Environment Calculated Maximum Radiation Power Density Region Level (mW/icm") Hazard Assessment 1. Far Field (R;= 250.1 m) S¢ 1.175 Satisfies FCC MPE 2. Near Field (R,; = 104.2 m) Sat 2.742 Satisfies FCC MPE 3. Transition Region (Ry; < R, < Rg) S; 2.742 Satisfies FCC MPE 4. Between Main Reflector and Ser 250.456 Potential Hazard Subreflector 5. Main Reflector Ssurface 4.527 Satisfies FCC MPE 6. Between Main Reflector and Ground Sq 1.132 Satisfies FCC MPE It is the applicant‘s responsibility to ensure that the public and operational personnel are not exposed to harmful levels of radiation. 7. Conclusions Based on the above analysis it is concluded that the FCC MPE guidelines have been exceeded (or met) in the regions of Table 4 and 5. The applicant proposes to comply with the MPE limits by one or more of the following methods. Means of Compliance Uncontrolled Areas This antenna will be located in a fenced area. The area will be sufficient to prohibit access to the areas that exceed the MPE limited. The general public will not have access to areas within % diameter removed from the edge of the antenna. Since one diameter removed from the main beam of the antenna or % diameter removed from the edge of the antenna the RF levels are reduced by a factor of 100 or 20 dB. None of the areas exceeding the MPE levels will be accessible by the general public.

Radiation Hazard Report Page 5 of 5 Radiation hazard signs will be posted while this earth station is in operation. The applicant will ensure that no buildings or oiher obstacles will be in the areas that exceed the MPE levels. Means of Compliance Controlled Areas The earth stations operational will not have access to the areas that exceed the MPE levels while the earth station is in operation. The transmitters will be turned off during antenna maintenance. The applicant agrees to abide by the conditions specified in Condition 5208 provided below: Condition 5208 — The licensee shall take all necessary measures to ensure that the antenna does not create potential exposure of humans to radiofrequency radiation in excess of the FCC exposure limits defined in 47 CFR 1.1307(b) and 1.1310 wherever such exposures might occur. Measures must be taken to ensure compliance with limits for both occupational/controlled exposure and for general population/uncontrolled exposure, as defined in these rule sections. Compliance can be accomplished in most cases by appropriate restrictions such as fencing. Requirements for restrictions can be determined by predictions based on calculations, modeling or by field measurements. The FCC‘s OET Bulletin 65 (available on—line at www.fec.gov/oet/rfsafety) provides information on predicting exposure levels and on methods for ensuring compliance, including the use of warning and alerting signs and protective equipment for worker. Prepared by: Timothy 0. Crutcher Telecom Engineer COMSEARCH

Radiation Hazard Report Page 1 of 5 Analysis of Non—lonizing Radiation for a 4.8—Meter Earth Station System This report analyzes the non—ionizing radiation levels for a 4.8—meter earth station system. The analysis and calculations performed in this report comply with the methods described in the FCC Office of Engineering and Technology Bulletin, No. 65 first published in 1985 and revised in 1997 in Edition 97—01. The radiation safety limits used in the analysis are in conformance with the FCC R&O 96—326. Bulletin No. 65 and the FCC R&O specifies that there are two separate tiers of exposure limits that are dependant on the situation in which the exposure takes place and/or the status of the individuals who are subject to the exposure. The Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) limits for persons in a General Population/Uncontrolled environment are shown in Table 1. The General Population/Uncontrolled MPE is a function of transmit frequency and is for an exposure period of thirty minutes or less. The MPE limits for persons in an Occupational/Controlled environment are shown in Table 2. The Occupational MPE is a function of transmit frequency and is for an exposure period of six minutes or less. The purpose of the analysis described in this report is to determine the power flux density levels of the earth station in the far—field, near—field, transition region, between the subreflector or feed and main reflector surface, at the main reflector surface, and between the antenna edge and the ground and to compare these levels to the specified MPEs. Table 1. Limits for General Population/Uncontrolled Exposure (MPE) Frequency Range (MHz) __Power Density (mW/cm*) 30—300 0.2 300—1500 Frequency (MHz)*(0.8/1200) 1500—100,000 1.0 Table 2. Limits for Occupational/Controlled Exposure (MPE) Frequency Range (MHz) Power Density (mW/em"*) 30—300 1.0 300—1500 Frequency (MHz)*(4.0/1200) 1500—100,000 5.0 Table 3. Formulas and Parameters Used for Determining Power Flux Densities Parameter Symbol Formula Value Units Antenna Diameter D Input 4.8 m Antenna Surface Area Asurface x D/ 4 18.10 m* Subreflector Diameter Dsr Input 60.5 cm Area of Subreflector Asr x Ds, 4 2874.75 cm* Frequency F Input 14250 MHz Wavelength A 300 / F 0.021053 m Transmit Power P Input 180.00 W Antenna Gain (dBi) Ges Input 55.0 dBi Antenna Gain (factor) G 1 0ces" 316227.8 n/a Pi T Constant 3.1415927 n/a Antenna Efficiency n GA*/(r‘D") 0.62 n/a

Radiation Hazard Report Page 2 of 5 1. Far Ffeld Distance Calculation The distance to the beginning of the far field can be determined from the following equation: Distance to the Far Field Region R; =0.60 D/A (1) = 656.6 m The maximum main beam power density in the far field can be determined from the following equation: On—Axis Power Density in the Far Field GP / (4 t Rf") (2) ( o =h 10.505 W/im* ol 1.051 mW/em* 2. Near Field Calculation Power flux density is considered to be at a maximum value throughout the entire length of the defined Near Field region. The region is contained within a cylindrical volume having the same diameter as the antenna. Past the boundary of the Near Field region, the power density from the antenna decreases linearly with respect to increasing distance. The distance to the end of the Near Field can be determined from the following equation: Extent of the Near Field Ry = D& / (4 ) (3) = 273.6 m The maximum power density in the Near Field can be determined from the following equation: Near Field Power Density Sar = 16.0 1 P / (1 D) (4) = 24.524 W/im* = 2.452 mWicm* 3. Transition Region Calculation The Transition region is located between the Near and Far Field regions. The power density begins to decrease linearly with increasing distance in the Transition region. While the power density decreases inversely with distance in the Transition region, the power density decreases inversely with the square of the distance in the Far Field region. The maximum power density in the Transition region will not exceed that calculated for the Near Field region. The power density calculated in Section 1 is the highest power density the antenna can produce in any of the regions away from the antenna. The power density at a distance R, can be determined from the following equation: Transition Region Power Density S. = SRa/R (5) = 2.452 mWicm*

Radiation Hazard Report Page 3 of 5 4. Region between the Main Reflector and the Subreflector Transmissions from the feed assembly are directed toward the subreflector surface, and are reflected back toward the main reflector. The most common feed assemblies are waveguide flanges, horns or subreflectors: The energy between the subreflector and the reflector surfaces can be calculated by determining the power density at the subreflector surface. This can be determined from the following equation: Power Density at the Subreflector Ssr = 4000 P / Ag; (6) = 250.456 mWi/icm* 5. Main Reflector Region The power density in the main reflector is determined in the same manner as the power density at the subreflector. The area is now the area of the main reflector aperture and can be determined from the following equation: Power Density at the Main Reflector Surface Ssurface > 4 P / Asurtace (7) = 39.789 W/m* = 3.979 mW/cm* 6. Region between the Main Reflector and the Ground Assuming uniform illumination of the reflector surface, the power density between the antenna and the ground can be determined from the following equation: Power Density between Reflector and Ground Sg =P / Agurtace (8) = 9.947 W/m* = 0.995 mW/cm*

Radiation Hazard Report Page 4 of 5 7. Summary of Calculations Table 4. Summary of Expected Radiation levels for Uncontrolled Environment Calculated Maximum Radiation Power Density Level Region (mW/em?*) _ Hazard Assessment 1. Far Field (Rg = 656.6 m) S¢ 1.051 Potential Hazard 2. Near Field (R,,; = 273.6 m) Sar 2.452 Potential Hazard 3. Transition Region (Ry; < R, < Rg) S; 2.452 Potential Hazard 4. Between Main Reflector and Ser 250.456 Potential Hazard Subreflector 5. Main Reflector Ssurface 3.979 Potential Hazard 6. Between Main Reflector and Ground _ Sq 0.995 Satisfies FCC MPE Table 5. Summary of Expected Radiation levels for Controlled Environment Calculated Maximum Radiation Power Density Region Level (mW/em*) Hazard Assessment 1. Far Field (Rg = 656.6 m) S¢ 1.051 Satisfies FCC MPE 2. Near Field (R,; = 273.6 m) Sn 2.452 Satisfies FCC MPE 3. Transition Region (R,; < R, < R;g) S; 2.452 Satisfies FCC MPE 4. Between Main Reflector and Ser 250.456 Potential Hazard Subreflector 5. Main Reflector Ssurface 3.979 Satisfies FCC MPE 6. Between Main Reflector and Ground Sq 0.995 Satisfies FCC MPE It is the applicant‘s responsibility to ensure that the public and operational personnel are not exposed to harmful levels of radiation. 8. Conclusions Based on the above analysis it is concluded that the FCC MPE guidelines have been exceeded (or met) in the regions of Table 4 and 5. The applicant proposes to comply with the MPE limits by one or more of the following methods. Means of Compliance Uncontrolled Areas This antenna will be located in a fenced area. The area will be sufficient to prohibit access to the areas that exceed the MPE limited. The general public will not have access to areas within !% diameter removed from the edge of the antenna. , Since one diameter removed from the main beam of the antenna or !% diameter removed from the edge of the antenna the RF levels are reduced by a factor of 100 or 20 dB. None of the areas exceeding the MPE levels will be accessible by the general public. Radiation hazard signs will be posted while this earth station is in operation.

Radiation Hazard Report Page 5 of 5 The applicant will ensure that no buildings or other obstacles will be in the areas that exceed the MPE levels. Means of Compliance Controlled Areas The earth stations operational will not have access to the areas that exceed the MPE levels while the earth station is in operation. The transmitters will be turned off during antenna maintenance. The applicant agrees to abide by the conditions specified in Condition 5208 provided below: Condition 5208 — The licensee shall take all necessary measures to ensure that the antenna does not create potential exposure of humans to radiofrequency radiation in excess of the FCC exposure limits defined in 47 CFR 1.1307(b) and 1.1310 wherever such exposures might occur. Measures must be taken to ensure compliance with limits for both occupational/controlled exposure and for general population/uncontrolled exposure, as defined in these rule sections. Compliance can be accomplished in most cases by appropriate restrictions such as fencing. Requirements for restrictions can be determined by predictions based on calculations, modeling or by field measurements. The FCC‘s OET Bulletin 65 (available on—line at www.fec.gov/oet/rfsafety) provides information on predicting exposure levels and on methods for ensuring compliance, including the use of warning and alerting signs and protective equipment for worker. Prepared by: Timothy 0. Crutcher Telecom Engineer COMSEARCH


Document Created: 2017-10-20 16:10:11
Document Modified: 2017-10-20 16:10:11
© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC