Attachment Exhibit C

This document pretains to SES-STA-20160520-00446 for Special Temporal Authority on a Satellite Earth Station filing.

IBFS_SESSTA2016052000446_1136631

Satellite On The Move terminal
             NanoSAT radiation analysis
                             D00000008-01-02
                               February 22, 2016




                                 Proprietary Notice

       The information and ideas contained herein are proprietary to Get SAT
 communications Ltd. and shall not be duplicated or disclosed outside the receiving
    organization or the receiving organization's potential customer without prior
  written approval from Get SAT communications LTD., nor used by the receiving
   organization or any of its subsidiaries or affiliates, for any purpose other than
                 evaluation of the ideas and work contained herein.


       Get SAT communications LTD., 514968718, INFO@getsat.COM


                                                                          D00000008-01-02


                               NANOSAT- RADIATION ANALYSIS




                                Figure 1: NanoSAT installation

The smallest angle between the beam and the operator’s head is 21.6 o. At that angle the
gain is lower by 20dB. The beam’s gain at its center is 27dBi, ergo the operator absorb 7
dBm of radiation.

Furthermore, the distance between the operator and the antenna also reduces the radiation
intensity. The distance between the operator and the antenna is 43cm, where which the
attenuation is 54.66dB.

A conservative assumption is that the whole 10w (40dBm) is radiated at the operator’s
direction, the gain is 7dBm and attenuated due to the distance (-54.66dB). In total the
operator absorbs 0.171mw (-7.66dBm).




 1
                                      Business sensitive


                                                                         D00000008-01-02


At higher elevation angles, the attenuation is even higher, which means less radiation reaches
the operator.

The above calculations assume that the aerial’s aiming direction is straight forward. Any
digression reduces even more the energy absorbed by the operator: higher elevation angle,
or azimuth different than straight forward.

In case of AMOS4 SAT, from Israel:


Aerial gain= 27dBi

Aerial gain @ (-21.6)o when aerial points to 40o=-21.6dBm

Total gain= 27-21.6= +5.4dBm

Aerial power= 10w (40dBm)

Attenuation @ of 43cm=54.66dBm

Operator received energy= power+total gain-distance attenuation=40+5.4-54.66=-9.26dBm

Operator absorbs (-9.26dBm) =0.119mw




 2
                                      Business sensitive



Document Created: 2016-05-19 17:20:40
Document Modified: 2016-05-19 17:20:40

© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC