KA258 NileSat-101 De

SUPPLEMENT submitted by Intelsat Corporation

Intelsat KA258 NileSat-101 De-Orbit Exh. A

2013-01-22

This document pretains to SES-STA-20130116-00056 for Special Temporal Authority on a Satellite Earth Station filing.

IBFS_SESSTA2013011600056_982168

                                             Exhibit A

               PETITION FOR WAIVER OF SECTIONS 25.137 AND 25.114

        Pursuant to Section 25.137 of the Federal Communications Commission’s
(“Commission” or “FCC”) rules, earth station applicants “requesting authority to operate with a
non-U.S. licensed space station to serve the United States” must demonstrate that effective
competitive opportunities exist and must provide the same technical information required by
Section 25.114 for U.S.-licensed space stations.1 Intelsat License LLC (“Intelsat”) herein seeks
authority to provide de-orbit services -- not commercial services -- from the United States, and
thus believes that Section 25.137 does not apply.

        To the extent the Commission determines, however, that Intelsat’s request for authority to
provide de-orbit services on a special temporary basis is a request to serve the United States with
a non U.S.-licensed satellite, Intelsat respectfully requests a waiver of Sections 25.137 and
25.114 of the Commission’s rules.2 The Commission may grant a waiver for good cause shown.3
The Commission typically grants a waiver where the particular facts make strict compliance
inconsistent with the public interest.4 In granting a waiver, the Commission may take into
account considerations of hardship, equity, or more effective implementation of overall policy on
an individual basis.5 Waiver is therefore appropriate if special circumstances warrant a deviation
from the general rule, and such a deviation will serve the public interest.

       In this case, good cause exists for a waiver of both Section 25.137 and Section 25.114.
With respect to Section 25.114, Intelsat seeks authority only to provide de-orbit services for the
NileSat-101 satellite. The information sought by Section 25.114 is not relevant to LEOP
services. Moreover, Intelsat does not have – and would not easily be able to obtain -- such
information because Intelsat is not the operator of the NileSat-101 satellite, nor is Intelsat in
contractual privity with that operator. Rather, an affiliate of Intelsat has a contract with Astrium,
the manufacturer of the NileSat-101 satellite, to conduct de-orbit services for the satellite.

        The information that Intelsat is not including is not required to determine potential
harmful interference. The Schedule S information for this satellite would pertain to the operation
of the NileSat-101 satellite at its final orbital location. However, the present application for de-
orbit services involves communications to the satellite as it departs its location in the
geostationary orbit. In other words, during the de-orbit mission, the earth station will only
briefly communicate with the satellite in the geostationary orbit. Primarily, it will be
transmitting to a satellite traveling to its final de-orbit altitude. Moreover, as with any STA,
Intelsat will perform the de-orbit services on a non-interference basis.



1
  47 C.F.R. § 25.137 (emphasis added).
2
  47 C.F.R. §§ 25.137 and 25.114.
3
  47 C.F.R. §1.3.
4
  N.E. Cellular Tel. Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (“Northeast Cellular”).
5
  WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1159 (D.C. Cir. 1969); Northeast Cellular, 897 F.2d at
1166.


       Because it is not relevant to the service for which Intelsat seeks authorization, and
because obtaining the information would be a hardship, Intelsat seeks a waiver of all the
information required by Section 25.114. Intelsat has provided in this STA request the required
technical information that is relevant to the de-orbit services for which Intelsat seeks
authorization.

         Good cause also exists to waive Section 25.137. Section 25.137 is designed to ensure
that “U.S.-licensed satellite systems have effective competitive opportunities to provide
analogous services” in other countries. Here, there is no service being provided by the satellite;
it is simply being taken to its de-orbit altitude. Thus, the purpose of the information required by
Section 25.137 is not implicated here. For example, Section 25.137(d) requires earth station
applicants requesting authority to operate with a non-U.S.-licensed space station that is not in
orbit and operating to post a bond.6 The underlying purpose in having to post a bond—i.e., to
prevent warehousing of orbital locations by operators seeking to serve the United States—would
not be served by requiring Intelsat to post a bond in order to provide approximately 14 days of
de-orbit services to the NileSat-101 satellite.

        It is Intelsat’s understanding that NileSat-101 is licensed by Egypt, which is a WTO-
member country. Thus, the purposes of Section 25.137—to ensure that U.S. satellite operators
enjoy “effective competitive opportunities” to serve foreign markets and to prevent warehousing
of orbital locations serving the United States—will not be undermined by grant of this waiver
request.

        Finally, Intelsat notes that it expects to operate with the NileSat-101 satellite using its
U.S. earth station for a period of approximately 14 days. Requiring Intelsat to obtain copious
technical and legal information from an unrelated party, where there is no risk of harmful
interference and the operations will cease after approximately 14 days, would pose undue
hardship without serving underlying policy objectives. Given these particular facts, the waiver
sought herein is plainly appropriate.




6
    See 47 C.F.R. §25.137(d)(4).



Document Created: 2013-01-22 16:39:42
Document Modified: 2013-01-22 16:39:42

© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC