Attachment Filing Info

This document pretains to SES-STA-20121120-01030 for Special Temporal Authority on a Satellite Earth Station filing.

IBFS_SESSTA2012112001030_975896

2 Degree Antenna Statement. The 3.8 meter antenna proposed in this application will operate with the same/similar parameters as the earth stations licensed under file number and call signs in the chart listed below. The maximum EIRP density of 33.07 dBW/4KHz for the 3.8 meter antenna filed in this application will be lower than the EIRP density dBW/AKHz filed in the following licenses. Satellite Max EIRP Max EIRP Max Max Arc Density EIRP Density EIRP see File WAw Emission dBW/AkHz dBw Emission dBW/AkHz dBW SES—RWL—20080303— E7900 00218 37.0/156.0 307KGW 31.73 50.58 SES—LIC—20060517— E060165 00825 37.0/155.5 230KGW 33.61 51.21 SES—LIC—20061207— E060432 02105 437139 154KGW 33.75 51.34 230KG7W 33.74 51.34 SES—LIC—20071017— E070242 01427 4371039 230KGW 33.16 50.76 SES—LIC—20070427— E070077 00526 43139 3OT7KGTW 31.3 50.15 SES—LIC—20080427— E080090 00495 437139 2M30GTE 34.5 62.22

Radiation Hazard Report Page 1 of 4 Analysis of Non—lonizing Radiation for a 3.8—Meter Earth Station System This report analyzes the non—ionizing radiation levels for a 3.8—meter earth station system. The analysis and calculations performed in this report comply with the methods described in the FCC Office of Engineering and Technology Bulletin, No. 65 first published in 1985 and revised in 1997 in Edition 97—01. The radiation safety limits used in the analysis are in conformance with the FCC R&O 96—326. Bulletin No. 65 and the FCC R&O specifies that there are two separate tiers of exposure limits that are dependant on the situation in which the exposure takes place and/or the status of the individuals who are subject to the exposure. The Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) limits for persons in a General Population/Uncontrolled environment are shown in Table 1. The General Population/Uncontrolled MPE is a function of transmit frequency and is for an exposure period of thirty minutes or less. The MPE limits for persons in an Occupational/Controlled environment are shown in Table 2. The Occupational MPE is a function of transmit frequency and is for an exposure period of six minutes or less. The purpose of the analysis described in this report is to determine the power flux density levels of the earth station in the far—field, near—fleld, transition region, between the subreflector or feed and main reflector surface, at the main reflector surface, and between the antenna edge and the ground and to | compare these levels to the specified MPEs. | 1 Table 1. Limits for General Population/Uncontrolied Exposure (MPE) | Frequency Range (MHz) __Power Density (mW/icm*) 30—200 0.2 300—1500 Frequency (MHz)®(0.8/1200) 1500—100,000 1.0 Table 2. Limits for Occupational/Controlled Exposure (MPE) Frequency Range (MHz) Power Density (mWicm") 30—300 1.0 300—1500 Frequency (MHz)®(4.0/1200) 1500—100,000 — 5.0 Table 3. Formulas and Parameters Used for Determining Power Flux Densities Parameter Symbol Formula Value Units Antenna Diameter D Input 3.8 m Antenna Surface Area Asurface xD*/ 4 11.34 m Feed Flange Diameter Ds Input 19.1 cm Area of Feed Flange Afa x D; 14 286.52 cm* Frequency F Input 6175 MHz Wavelength _ A 300 /F 0.048583 m Transmit Power P Input 20.00 W Antenna Gain (dBi) Ges Input 45.9 dBi Antenna Gain (factor) C 19c 38904.5 n/ia Pi r Constant 3.1415927 na Antenna Efficiency i CRM/(RD®) 0.64 n/a

Radiation Hazard Report Page 2 of 4 1. Far Field Distance Calculation The distance to the beginning of the far field can be determined from the following equation: Distance to the Far Field Region R; =0.60 D/ 2 (1) = 178.3 m The maximum main beam power density in the far field can be determined from the following equation: On—Axis Power Density in the Far Field S; =GP/(4rRy") (2) 1.947 Wim* 0.195 mW/cm* 2. Near Field Calculation Power flux density is considered to be at a maximum value throughout the entire length of the defined Near Field region. The region is contained within a cylindrical volume having the same diameter as the antenna. Past the boundary of the Near Field region, the power density from the antenna decreases linearly with respect to increasing distance. The distance to the end of the Near Field can be determined from the following equation: Extent of the Near Field Ry =D/(4A) (3) = 74.3 m The maximum power density in the Near Field can be determined from the following equation: Near Field Power Density Sy = 16041 P /(z D°) (4) =4.545 Wim* = 0.455 mW/cm* 3. Transition Region Calculation The Transition region is located between the Near and Far Field regions. The power density begins to decrease linearly with increasing distance in the Transition region. While the power density decreases inversely with distance in the Transition region, the power density decreases inversely with the square of the distance in the Far Field region. The maximum power density in the Transition region will not exceed that calculated for the Near Field region. The power density calculated in Section 1 is the highest power density the antenna can produce in any of the regions away from the antenna. The power density at a distance R, can be determined from the following equation: Transition Region Power Density $ = SRu/R (5) =0.455 mW/cm*

Radiation Hazard Report Page 3 of 4 4. Region between the Feed Assembly and the Antenna Reflector Transmissions from the feed assembly are directed toward the antenna reflector surface, and are confined within a conical shape defined by the type of feed assembly. The most common feed assemblies are waveguide flanges, horns or subreflectors. The energy between the feed assembly and reflector surface can be calculated by determining the power density at the feed assembly surface. This can be determined from the following equation: Power Density at the Feed Flange Sr = 4000 P / Aj (6) =279.212 mW/icm* 5. Main Reflector Region The power density in the main reflector is determined in the same manner as the power density at the feed assembly. The area is now the area of the reflector aperture and can be determined from the following equation: Power Density at the Reflector Surface Seurtace 4 P / Asurtace (7) = 7.054 Wim* =0.705 mWicm* 6. Region between the Reflector and the Ground Assuming uniform illumination of the reflector surface, the power density between the antenna and the ground can be determined from the following equation: Power Density between Reflector and Ground Sq =P / Asurface (8) = 1.763 W/im* = 0.176 mW/cm?

Radiation Hazard Report Page 4 of 4 7. Summary of Calculations Table 4. Summary of Expected Radiation levels for Uncontrolied Environment Calculated Maximum Radiation Power Density Level Region (mWicm") Hazard Assessment 1. Far Field (R;= 178.3 m) S¢ 0.195 Satisfies FCC MPE 2. Near Field (Ry;= 74.3 m) Sn 0.455 Satisfies FCC MPE 3. Transition Region (Ry < R < Ry) S; 0.455 Satisfies FCC MPE 4. Between Feed Assembly and Sn 279.212 Potential Hazard Antenna Reflector 5. Main Reflector Scurface 0.705 Satisfies FCC MPE 6. Between Reflector and Ground S 0.176 Satisfies FCC MPE Table 5. Summary of Expected Radiation levels for Controlled Environment Calculated Maximum Radiation Power Density Region Level (mW/icm?) Hazard Assessment 1. Far Field (R; = 178.3 m) Sr 0.195 Satisfies FCC MPE 2. Near Field (Ry = 74.3 m) Sy 0.455 Satisfies FCC MPE 3. Transition Region (R; < R, < Ry) S 0.455 Satisfies FCC MPE 4. Between Feed Assembly and S 279.212 Potential Hazard Antenna Reflector 5. Main Reflector Ssurface 0.705 Satisfies FCC MPE 6. Between Reflector and Ground S 0.176 Satisfies FCC MPE It is the applicant‘s responsibility to ensure that the public and operational personnel are not exposed to harmful levels of radiation. 8. Conclusions Based on the above analysis it is concluded that harmful levels of radiation will not exist in regions normally occupied by the public or the earth station‘s operating personnel. The transmitter will be turned off during antenna maintenance so that the FCC MPE of 5.0 mW/cm2 will be complied with for those regions with close proximity to the reflector that exceed acceptable levels.

FREQUENCY COORDINATION AND INTERFERENCE ANALYSIS REPORT Prepared for Board of Supervisors of LSUA&M College SHREVEPORT, LA Satellite Earth Station Prepared By: COMSEARCH 19700 Janelia Farm Boulevard Ashburn, VA 20147 October 01, 2012

TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. CONCLUSIONS ..... .. . o en en ceveverveneneenenrenenrninnrevenrereneneereneeneneenerrererenreeverneennrneneeveeererernnenennennnnereenencnns 2. SUMMARY OF RESULTS ........ 3. SUPPLEMENTAL SHOWING ... 4. EARTH STATION COORDINATION DATA §. CERTIFICATION ... m n neneeenermennerernenermereemerrene Frequency Coordination and Interference Analysis Report 10/01/2012 Page 2 of 10

1. CONCLUSIONS An interference study considering all existing, proposed and prior coordinated microwave facilities within the coordination contours of the proposed earth station demonstrates that this site will operate satisfactorily with the common carrier microwave environment. This earth station will be limited to operations of the bandwidths shown in Section 4 of this report. ‘ Frequency Coordination and Interference Analysis Report 10/01/2012 Page 3 of 10

2. SUMMARY OF RESULTS A number of great circle interference cases were identified during the interference study of the proposed earth station. Each of the cases, which exceeded the interference objective on a line—of—sight basis, was profiled and the propagation losses estimated using NBS TN101 (Revised) techniques. The losses were found to be sufficient to reduce the signal levels to acceptable magnitudes in every case. The following companies reported potential great circle interference conflicts that did not meet the objectives on a line—of—sight basis. When over—the—horizon losses are considered on the interfering paths, sufficient blockage exists to negate harmful interference from occurring with the proposed transmit—receive earth station. Company Centerpoint Energy Field Services Central Louisiana License Co., LLC Lousiana Dept. of Transportation and Dev New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC — LA, GM Wireless Infrastructure Partners, LLC No other carriers reported potential interference cases. Frequency Coordination and Interference Analysis Report 10/01/2012 Page 4 of 10

3. SUPPLEMENTAL SHOWING Pursuant to Part 25.203(c) of the FCC Rules and Regulations, the satellite earth station proposed in this application was coordinated by Comsearch using computer techniques and in accordance with Part 25 of the FCC Rules and Regulations. Coordination data for this earth station was sent to the below listed carriers with a letter dated 07/27/2012. Company Allied Wireless Communications Corp. Alltel Comm., of Southwest Arkansas Allte! Wireless of Alexandria, LLC Alitel Comm of Arkansas RSA #12 Cell L P Alitel Comm of N Louisiana Cellular LP Alltel Communications Wireless Inc. —AR Alite! Communications Wireless Inc.— CTX Alltel Communications Wireless of LA, In i American Electric Power Service Corp. } Centerpoint Energy Field Services i Central Louisiana License Co., LLC Cleco Power LLC Conterra Ultra Broadband, LLC Encana Oil & Gas (USA) Inc. Entergy Services Inc Etex Communications, L.P. KN Telecommunications, Inc. LaSalle Parish School District Longview, City of Lousiana Dept. of Transportation and Dev New Cingular Wireless PCS LLC — N Texas New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC — AR New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC — LA, GM Nexus Systems, Inc. Northeast Texas Consortium(NETnet) PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF OKLAKHOMA SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY TX—10 Licensee Co., LLC Texas RSA 11B Limited Partnership Texas RSA 7B2 Limited Partnership Trunkline Gas Company, LLC Tyler—Longview—Marshall MSA LtdPartners UNITED WEHCO INC. Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC (CA) Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC — Arkansas Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC—Central Texas Verizon Wireless Personal Comm LP—LA/MS Verizon Wireless(VAW) LLC—AZ/CO/NM/NV/UT WWC Texas RSA Limited Partnership Wireless Infrastructure Partners, LLC Frequency Coordination and Interference Analysis Report 10/01/2012 Page 5 of 10

4. EARTH STATION COORDINATION DATA This section presents the data pertinent to frequency coordination of the proposed earth station that was circulated to all carriers within its coordination contours. Frequency Coordination and Interference Analysis Report 10/01/2012 Page 6 of 10

COMSEARCH Earth Station Data Sheet 19700 Janelia Farm Boulevard, Ashburn, VA 20147 (703)726—5500 http:/www.comsearch.com Date: 10/01/2012 Job Number: 120727COMSTCO2 Administrative Information Licensee Name Board of Supervisors of LSU/A&M College Site Information SHREVEPORT, LA Latitude (NAD 83) 32°25" 28.0" N Longitude (NAD 83) 93°42‘ 24.7" W Climate Zone A Rain Zone 1 Ground Elevation (AMSL) 49.23 m / 161.5 ft Link Information Satellite Type Geostationary Mode TR — Transmit—Receive Modulation Digital Satellite Arc 37.5°W to 139°West Longitude Azimuth Range 109.7"to 242.0° Corresponding Elevation Angles 19.8°/ 28.8° Antenna Centerline (AGL) 2.6 m / 8.5 ft Antenna Information Receive Transmit Manufacturer/Model Prodelin 1385 Prodelin 1385 Gain / Diameter 41.9 dBi/3.8 m 45.9 dBi / 3.8 m 3—dB / 15—4B Beamwidth 1.60° /3.20° 0.80° / 1.60° 154KGTW 230KG7W Max Available RF Power (dBW/4 kHz) 1283 ~14.08 (dBW/MHz) 1114 9.9 Maximum EIRP (dBW/4 kHz) 33.07 31.82 (dBWIMHz) 57.04 55.80 (dBW) 50.67 47.66 Interference Objectives: Long Term —156.0 dBW/MHz 20% ~154.0 dBW/4 kHz 20% Short Term ~146.0 dBW/MHz 0.01% —131.0 dBW/A4 kHz 0.0025% Frequency Information Receive 4.0 GHz Transmit 6.1 GHz Emission / Frequency Range (MHz) 154KG7W / 3700.0 — 4200.0 154KGTW / 5925.0 — 6078.35 230KG7W / 3700.0 — 4200.0 230KGTW / 5925.0 — 6078.35 154KGTW 1 6108.55 — 6271.09 230KG7W / 6108.55 — 6271.09 154KGTW / 6301.29 — 6330.39 230KG7W / 6301.29 — 6330.39 154KGTW / 6360.59 — 6425.0 230KG7W / 6360.59 — 6425.0 Max Great Circle Coordination Distance 353.3 km / 219.5 mi 168.6 km / 104.7 mi Precipitation Scatter Contour Radius 580.0 km / 360.3 mi 100.0 km / 62.1 mi Frequency Coordination and Interference Analysis Report 10/01/2012 Page 7 of 10

COMSEARCH Earth Station Data Sheet 19700 Janelia Farm Boulevard, Ashburn, VA 20147 (703)726—5500 http://www.comsearch.com Coordination Values SHREVEPORT, LA Licensee Name Board of Supervisors of LSU/A&M College Latitude (NAD 83) 32°25‘ 28.0" N Longitude (NAD 83) 93°4224.7" W Ground Elevation (AMSL) 49.23 m / 161.5 ft Antenna Centerline (AGL) 2.6 m / 8.5 ft Antenna Mode Receive 4.0 GHz Transmit 6.1 GHz Interference Objectives: Long Term ~156.0 dBW/MHz 20% —154.0 dBW/4 kHz 20% Short Term ~146.0 dBW/MHz 0.01% —131.0 dBW/4 kHz 0.0025% Max Available RF Power =12.8 (dBW/4 kHz) : Receive 4.0 GHz Transmit 6.1 GHz ‘ Horizon Antenna Horizon Coordination Horizon Coordination Azimuth (°) Elevation (°) Discrimination {°} Gain (dBi) Distance (km) Gain (dBi) Distance (km) 0 0.00 108.53 ~10.00 285.28 ~10.00 134.86 5 0.00 103.85 ~10.00 285.28 ~10.00 134.86 10 0.00 99.16 ~10.00 285.28 ~10.00 134.86 15 0.00 94.46 ~10.00 285.28 ~10.00 134.86 20 0.00 89.76 ~10.00 285.28 ~10.00 134.86 25 0.00 85.06 ~10.00 285.28 ~10.00 134.86 30 0.00 80.36 ~10.00 205.28 ~10.00 134.86 35 0.00 75.67 ~10.00 285.28 ~10.00 134.86 40 0.00 70.99 ~10.00 285.28 ~10.00 134.86 45 0.00 66.33 —10.00 285.28 —10.00 134.86 i 50 0.00 61.70 ~10.00 285.28 ~10.00 134.86 | 55 0.00 57.11 —10.00 285.28 ~10.00 134.86 I 60 0.00 52.56 —10.00 285.28 ~10.00 134.86 | 65 0.00 48.07 ~10.00 285.28 —10.00 134.86 i 70 0.00 43.67 —9.00 291.69 —9.00 137.69 75 0.00 39.37 —7.88 299.12 —7.88 141.03 80 0.00 35.23 —6.67 307.32 —6.67 144.77 85 0.00 31.31 —5.39 316.91 —5.39 148.95 90 0.00 27.69 —4.06 326.42 ~4.06 153.50 95 0.00 24.52 —2.74 336.03 —2.74 158.21 100 0.00 22.00 —1.56 344.79 ~1.56 162.61 105 0.00 20.36 —0.72 351.13 —0.72 165.84 110 0.00 19.82 —0.43 353.33 —0.43 168.60 115 0.00 20.48 —0.78 350.64 —0.78 165.59 120 0.00 22.22 ~1.67 343.97 ~1.67 162.19 125 0.00 24.82 —2.87 335.06 —2.87 157.73 130 0.00 28.05 ~4.20 325.42 ~4.20 153.02 135 0.00 31.68 —5.52 316.01 —5.52 148.53 140 0.00 35.28 ~6.69 307.23 —6.69 144.73 145 0.00 38.69 —7.69 300.40 —7.69 141.60 150 0.00 41.87 —8.55 294.69 —8.55 139.03 155 0.00 44.16 —9.27 289.95 —9.27 136.91 160 0.00 47.29 —9.87 286.11 —9.87 135.22 165 0.00 49.38 —10.00 285.28 ~10.00 134.86 170 0.00 50.95 ~10.00 285.28 ~10.00 134.86 175 0.00 51.93 ~10.00 285.28 —10.00 134.86 180 0.00 52.27 ~10.00 285.28 ~10.00 134.86 185 0.00 51.93 ~10.00 285.28 ~10.00 134.86 Frequency Coordination and Interference Analysis Report 10/01/2012 Page 8 of 10

COMSEARCH Earth Station Data Sheet 19700 Janelia Farm Boulevard, Ashburn, VA 20147 (703)726—5500 http:/www.comsearch.com Coordination Values SHREVEPORT, LA Licensee Name Board of Supervisors of LSU/A&M College Latitude (NAD 83) 32°25‘ 28.0" N Longitude (NAD 83) 93°42" 24.7" W Ground Elevation (AMSL) 49.23 m / 161.5 ft Antenna Centerline (AGL) 2.6 m / 8.5 it Antenna Mode Receive 4.0 GHz Transmit 6.1 GHz Interference Objectives: Long Term —156.0 dBW/MHz 20% —154.0 dBW/4 kHz 20% Short Term —146.0 dBW/MHz 0.01% —131.0 dBW/4 kHz 0.0025% Max Available RF Power —12.8 (dBW/4 kHz) Receive 4.0 GHz Transmit 6.1 GHz Horizon Antenna Horizon Coordination Horizon Coordination Azimuth (°) Elevation (°) Discrimination (*) Gain (dBi) Distance (km) _. Gain (dBi) Distance (km) 190 0.00 50.95 —10.00 285.28 ~10.00 134.86 195 0.00 49.38 ~10.00 285.28 —10.00 134.86 200 0.00 47.29 —9.87 286.12 —9.87 1365.22 i 205 0.00 44.76 —9.27 289.95 —9.27 136.92 i 210 0.26 41.69 —8.50 287.21 —8.50 133.89 215 0.00 38.70 —7.69 300.38 —7 69 141.59 220 0.00 35.69 —6.81 306.35 ~6.81 144.33 225 0.00 33.10 —6.00 312.66 —6.00 146.96 230 0.00 31.03 —5.29 317.60 —5.29 149.28 235 0.21 29.39 ~4.10 320.37 —4.10 150.20 ; 240 0.23 28.65 —4.43 319.66 ~4.43 149.12 245 0.22 28.74 —4.46 321.22 —4.46 150.35 § 250 0.23 29.58 ~4.18 317.56 —4.78 148.24 | 255 0.00 31.36 —5.41 316.77 —5.41 148.89 i 260 0.30 33.29 —6.06 299.03 ~6.06 137.85 265 0.27 36.01 —6.91 296.65 —6.91 137.68 270 0.28 39.10 ~7.80 288.98 —7.80 133.98 275 0.22 42.54 —8.72 290.64 —8.72 136.53 280 0.25 46.17 . —9.61 281.91 —9.61 133.31 285 0.21 50.02 —10.00 283.63 —10.00 133.76 290 0.22 53.98 ~10.00 282.21 —10.00 134.08 i 295 0.22 58.07 ~10.00 282.36 —10.00 134.18 300 0.24 62.23 ~10.00 279.81 ~10.00 132.50 ; 305 0.00 66.52 ~10.00 285.28 ~10.00 134.86 310 0.00 70.80 ~10.00 285.28 ~10.00 134.86 315 0.00 75.12 ~10.00 285.28 —10.00 134.86 320 0.00 7947 ~10.00 285.28 ~10.00 134.86 325 0.00 83.83 ~10.00 285.28 ~10.00 134.86 330 0.00 88.21 ~10.00 285.28 —10.00 134.86 335 0.00 92.59 —10.00 285.28 ~10.00 134.86 340 0.00 96.97 ~10.00 285.28 ~10.00 134.86 345 0.00 101.33 ~10.00 285.28 ~10.00 134.86 350 0.00 105.67 —10.00 285.28° —10.00 134.86 355 0.00 109.98 ~10.00 285.28 —10.00 134.86 Frequency Coordination and Interference Analysis Report 10/01/2012 Page 9 of 10

5. CERTIFICATION 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT | AM THE TECHNICALLY QUALIFIED PERSON RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PREPARATION OF THE FREQUENCY COORDINATION DATA CONTAINED IN THIS APPLICATION, THAT 1| AM FAMILIAR WITH PARTS 101 AND 25 OF THE FCC RULES AND REGULATIONS, THAT I HAVE EITHER PREPARED OR REVIEWED THE FREQUENCY COORDINATION DATA SUBMITTED WITH THIS APPLICATION, AND THAT IT IS COMPLETE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. Toblad Timothy O. Crutcher Frequency Planner COMSEARCH 19700 Janelia Farm Boulevard Ashburn, VA 20147 DATED: October 01. 2012 Frequency Coordination and Interference Analysis Report 10/01/2012 Page 10 of 10


Document Created: 2019-04-12 07:11:49
Document Modified: 2019-04-12 07:11:49
© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC