Attachment Exhibits A - E

This document pretains to SES-STA-20110725-00857 for Special Temporal Authority on a Satellite Earth Station filing.

IBFS_SESSTA2011072500857_907570

EXHIBIT A INTELSAT LICENSE LLC 180-DAY STA REQUEST TO TEST 2.4 METER EARTH STATION AT NAPA, CA JULY 25, 2011

EXHIBIT A Characteristics of the proposed operations Antenna location Intelsat Napa Teleport LONGITUDE (deg, min, sec- NAD 83) ) 237° 43’ 12” East LATITUDE (deg, min, sec- NAD 83) ) 38° 14’ 42” North ANTENNA HEIGHT IN METERS: 3 GROUND ELEVATION( AMSL) 10 ft ANTENNA LOCATION: GROUND: GROUND ROOF (Meters) BUILDING HEIGHT (Meters) Antenna Characteristics ANTENNA SIZE & GAIN SIZE 2.4m TX GAIN 41.7 dBi RX GAIN 38.5 dBi ANTENNA MODEL 9797 ANTENNA MANUFACTURER SEATEL MAXIMUM HPA POWER 25 W TOTAL EIRP FOR ALL CARRIERS 55.7 dBW SATELLITES DESIRED: IS-701 @180°E UPLINK FREQUENCIES: 6342 – 6378 MHz DOWNLINK FREQUENCIES: 4117 – 4153 MHz Uplink carrier parameters TYPE OF SERVICE (broadcast data TTC) Data DATA RATE(S): 166 kbps MODULATION: QPSK POLARIZATION RIGHT HAND CIRCULAR FORWARD ERROR CODING RATE: 0.660 OCCUPIED BANDWIDTH 0.163 MHz UPLINK EIRP PER CARRIER 45.4 Downlink Carrier Parameters TYPE OF SERVICE (broadcast data TTC) Data DATA RATE(S): 265 kbps POLARIZATION: LEFT HAND CIRCULAR MODULATION: QPSK OCCUPIED BANDWIDTH 0.218 MHz

EXHIBIT B INTELSAT LICENSE LLC 180-DAY STA REQUEST TO TEST 2.4 METER EARTH STATION AT NAPA, CA JULY 25, 2011

Exhibit B Radiation Hazard Report Page 1 of 5 Analysis of Non-Ionizing Radiation for a 2.4-Meter Earth Station System This report analyzes the non-ionizing radiation levels for a 2.4-meter earth station system. The analysis and calculations performed in this report comply with the methods described in the FCC Office of Engineering and Technology Bulletin, No. 65 first published in 1985 and revised in 1997 in Edition 97-01. The radiation safety limits used in the analysis are in conformance with the FCC R&O 96-326. Bulletin No. 65 and the FCC R&O specifies that there are two separate tiers of exposure limits that are dependant on the situation in which the exposure takes place and/or the status of the individuals who are subject to the exposure. The Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) limits for persons in a General Population/Uncontrolled environment are shown in Table 1. The General Population/Uncontrolled MPE is a function of transmit frequency and is for an exposure period of thirty minutes or less. The MPE limits for persons in an Occupational/Controlled environment are shown in Table 2. The Occupational MPE is a function of transmit frequency and is for an exposure period of six minutes or less. The purpose of the analysis described in this report is to determine the power flux density levels of the earth station in the far-field, near-field, transition region, between the subreflector or feed and main reflector surface, at the main reflector surface, and between the antenna edge and the ground and to compare these levels to the specified MPEs. Table 1. Limits for General Population/Uncontrolled Exposure (MPE) Frequency Range (MHz) Power Density (mW/cm2) 30-300 0.2 300-1500 Frequency (MHz)*(0.8/1200) 1500-100,000 1.0 Table 2. Limits for Occupational/Controlled Exposure (MPE) Frequency Range (MHz) Power Density (mW/cm2) 30-300 1.0 300-1500 Frequency (MHz)*(4.0/1200) 1500-100,000 5.0 Table 3. Formulas and Parameters Used for Determining Power Flux Densities Parameter Symbol Formula Value Units Antenna Diameter D Input 2.4 m Antenna Surface Area Asurface π D2 / 4 4.52 m2 Feed Flange Diameter Dfa Input 19.0 cm Area of Feed Flange Afa π Dfa 2/4 283.53 cm2 Frequency F Input 6350 MHz Wavelength λ 300 / F 0.047244 m Transmit Power P Input 25.00 W Antenna Gain (dBi) Ges Input 41.7 dBi Antenna Gain (factor) G 10Ges/10 14791.1 n/a Pi π Constant 3.1415927 n/a Antenna Efficiency η Gλ2/(π2D2) 0.58 n/a

Exhibit B Radiation Hazard Report Page 2 of 5 1. Far Field Distance Calculation The distance to the beginning of the far field can be determined from the following equation: Distance to the Far Field Region Rff = 0.60 D2 / λ (1) = 73.2 m The maximum main beam power density in the far field can be determined from the following equation: On-Axis Power Density in the Far Field Sff = G P / (4 π Rff 2) (2) = 5.499 W/m2 = 0.550 mW/cm2 2. Near Field Calculation Power flux density is considered to be at a maximum value throughout the entire length of the defined Near Field region. The region is contained within a cylindrical volume having the same diameter as the antenna. Past the boundary of the Near Field region, the power density from the antenna decreases linearly with respect to increasing distance. The distance to the end of the Near Field can be determined from the following equation: Extent of the Near Field Rnf = D2 / (4 λ) (3) = 30.5 m The maximum power density in the Near Field can be determined from the following equation: Near Field Power Density Snf = 16.0 η P / (π D2) (4) = 12.837 W/m2 = 1.284 mW/cm2 3. Transition Region Calculation The Transition region is located between the Near and Far Field regions. The power density begins to decrease linearly with increasing distance in the Transition region. While the power density decreases inversely with distance in the Transition region, the power density decreases inversely with the square of the distance in the Far Field region. The maximum power density in the Transition region will not exceed that calculated for the Near Field region. The power density calculated in Section 1 is the highest power density the antenna can produce in any of the regions away from the antenna. The power density at a distance Rt can be determined from the following equation: Transition Region Power Density St = Snf Rnf / Rt (5) = 1.284 mW/cm2

Exhibit B Radiation Hazard Report Page 3 of 5 4. Region between the Feed Assembly and the Antenna Reflector Transmissions from the feed assembly are directed toward the antenna reflector surface, and are confined within a conical shape defined by the type of feed assembly. The most common feed assemblies are waveguide flanges, horns or subreflectors. The energy between the feed assembly and reflector surface can be calculated by determining the power density at the feed assembly surface. This can be determined from the following equation: Power Density at the Feed Flange Sfa = 4000 P / Afa (6) = 352.698 mW/cm2 5. Main Reflector Region The power density in the main reflector is determined in the same manner as the power density at the feed assembly. The area is now the area of the reflector aperture and can be determined from the following equation: Power Density at the Reflector Surface Ssurface = 4 P / Asurface (7) = 22.105 W/m2 = 2.210 mW/cm2 6. Region between the Reflector and the Ground Assuming uniform illumination of the reflector surface, the power density between the antenna and the ground can be determined from the following equation: Power Density between Reflector and Ground Sg = P / Asurface (8) = 5.526 W/m2 = 0.553 mW/cm2

Exhibit B Radiation Hazard Report Page 4 of 5 7. Summary of Calculations Table 4. Summary of Expected Radiation levels for Uncontrolled Environment Calculated Maximum Radiation Power Density Level Region (mW/cm2) Hazard Assessment 1. Far Field (Rff = 73.2 m) Sff 0.550 Satisfies FCC MPE 2. Near Field (Rnf = 30.5 m) Snf 1.284 Potential Hazard 3. Transition Region (Rnf < Rt < Rff) St 1.284 Potential Hazard 4. Between Feed Assembly and Sfa 352.698 Potential Hazard Antenna Reflector 5. Main Reflector Ssurface 2.210 Potential Hazard 6. Between Reflector and Ground Sg 0.553 Satisfies FCC MPE Table 5. Summary of Expected Radiation levels for Controlled Environment Calculated Maximum Radiation Power Density Region Level (mW/cm2) Hazard Assessment 1. Far Field (Rff = 73.2 m) Sff 0.550 Satisfies FCC MPE 2. Near Field (Rnf = 30.5 m) Snf 1.284 Satisfies FCC MPE 3. Transition Region (Rnf < Rt < Rff) St 1.284 Satisfies FCC MPE 4. Between Feed Assembly and Sfa 352.698 Potential Hazard Antenna Reflector 5. Main Reflector Ssurface 2.210 Satisfies FCC MPE 6. Between Reflector and Ground Sg 0.553 Satisfies FCC MPE It is the applicant's responsibility to ensure that the public and operational personnel are not exposed to harmful levels of radiation.

Exhibit B Radiation Hazard Report Page 5 of 5 8. Conclusions Based upon the above analysis, it is concluded that FCC RF Guidelines have been exceeded in the specified region(s) of Table 4. The applicant proposes to comply with the Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) limits of 1.0 mW/cm**2 for the Uncontrolled Areas, and the MPE limits of 5.0 mW/cm**2 for the Controlled Areas. The antenna will be installed at the Applicant’s teleport facility near Napa, California. The earth station facility is surrounded by a fence, which will restrict any public access. The earth station will be marked with the standard radiation hazard warnings, as well as the area in the vicinity of the earth station to inform those in the general population, who might be working or otherwise present in or near the direct path of the main beam. The applicant will ensure that the main beam of the antenna will be pointed at least one diameter away from any building, or other obstacles in those areas that exceed the MPE levels. Since one diameter removed from the center of the main beam the levels are down at least 20 dB, or by a factor of 100, these potential hazards do not exist for either the public, or for earth station personnel. Finally, the earth station’s operating personnel will not have access to areas that exceed the MPE levels, while the earth station is in operation. The transmitter will be turned off during periods of maintenance, so that the MPE standard of 5.0 mw/cm**2 will be complied with for those regions in close proximity to the main reflector, which could be occupied by operating personnel. The applicant agrees to abide by the conditions specified in Condition 5208 provided below: Condition 5208 - The licensee shall take all necessary measures to ensure that the antenna does not create potential exposure of humans to radiofrequency radiation in excess of the FCC exposure limits defined in 47 CFR 1.1307(b) and 1.1310 wherever such exposures might occur. Measures must be taken to ensure compliance with limits for both occupational/controlled exposure and for general population/uncontrolled exposure, as defined in these rule sections. Compliance can be accomplished in most cases by appropriate restrictions such as fencing. Requirements for restrictions can be determined by predictions based on calculations, modeling or by field measurements. The FCC's OET Bulletin 65 (available on-line at www.fcc.gov/oet/rfsafety) provides information on predicting exposure levels and on methods for ensuring compliance, including the use of warning and alerting signs and protective equipment for worker.

EXHIBIT C INTELSAT LICENSE LLC 180-DAY STA REQUEST TO TEST 2.4 METER EARTH STATION AT NAPA, CA JULY 25, 2011







EXHIBIT D INTELSAT LICENSE LLC 180-DAY STA REQUEST TO TEST 2.4 METER EARTH STATION AT NAPA, CA JULY 25, 2011


EXHIBIT E INTELSAT LICENSE LLC 180-DAY STA REQUEST TO TEST 2.4 METER EARTH STATION AT NAPA, CA JULY 25, 2011

EXHIBIT E COMMENTS REGARDING COMPLANCE WITH SECTION 25.218 OFF-AXIS EIRP DENSITY LEVELS The proposed operations will comply with the relevant off-axis EIRP density levels of Section 25.218 of the FCC’s rules. Exhibit D is a statement from the antenna manufacturer stipulating compliance with various FCC provisions, including the off-axis EIRP density levels in Section 25.221(a)(1) and 25.221(a)(2) of the FCC’s rules. Section 25.221 would be applicable for operation of this antenna on a vessel (as an ESV). According to the manufacturer’s statement, this compliance is ensured for a transmitted power density level of at most -7dBW/4 kHz. The power density level of -12.4 dBW/4 kHz, which is transmitted during the proposed operations, is lower than the above value and thus compliance with Section 25.221 off-axis EIRP density levels is ensured. The above section 25.221 off-axis EIRP density levels are more restrictive than those specified in Section 25.218(d)(1) and 25.218(d)(2) of the FCC’s rules. As Section 25.218 is applicable in this case of a fixed transmit/receive operation, the transmissions will be within the levels permitted under Section 25.218 of the FCC’s rules, and will be consistent with the FCC’s two- degree spacing policy.


Document Created: 2011-07-25 12:31:00
Document Modified: 2011-07-25 12:31:00
© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC