Attachment Exhibits A - C

This document pretains to SES-STA-20110627-00746 for Special Temporal Authority on a Satellite Earth Station filing.

IBFS_SESSTA2011062700746_899977

EXHIBIT A INTELSAT LICENSE LLC 1.0 METER KU—BAND EARTH STATION HAGERSTOWN, MARYLAND JUNE 27, 2011

Exhibit A Transmission data for KNS 1.0m antenna SITE NAME (or identifier): Mountainside Teleport Antenna location LONGITUDE (deg, min, see— NAD 83) ) 282 deg, 16 min, 12 sec degrees east LATITUDE (deg, min, sec— NAD 83) ) 39 deg, 42 min, 0 sec degrees north ANTENNA HEIGHT IN METERS: 2.5 meters GROUND ELEVATION( AMSL) 170 m ANTENNA LOCATION: GROUND: On a vertical post mounted on the ground. Antenna Characteristics ANTENNA SIZE & GAIN SIZE 1.0 m Ku band antenna TX GAIN 41.1 dBi RX GAIN 40.5 dBi ANTENNA MODEL SuperTrack Z10Mk2 ANTENNA MANUFACTURER KNS Inc. in Southern Korea MAXIMUM HPA POWER 8 Watts TOTAL EIRP FOR ALL CARRIERS 50.1 dBW SATELLITES DESIRED: G—25 @ 93 W; H—2 @ 74 w; G—25 H—2 UPLINK FREQUENCIES: In range: 14184.5 In range: 14313.5 to 14211.5 MHz to 14318.0 MHz DOWNLINK FREQUENCIES: In range: 11884.5 In range: 12013.5 to 11911.5 MHz to 12018.0 MHz Uplink carrier parameters G—25 H—2 TYPE OF SERVICE (broadcast data TTC) Data Data DATA RATE(S): 384 Kbis 384 Kb/s MODULATION: BPSK BPSK POLARIZATION Horizontal Vertical FORWARD ERROR CODING RATE: 0.66 0.66 OCCUPIED BANDWIDTH 0.758 MHz 0.758 MHz UPLINK EIRP PER CARRIER 45.4 dBW 45.4 dBW Downlink Carrier Parameters TYPE OF SERVICE (broadcast data TTC) Data Data DATA RATE(S): 512 Kb/s 512 Kbis POLARIZATION: Horizontal Vertical MODULATION: QPSK QPSK OCCUPIED BANDWIDTH 0.334 MHz 0.334 MHz Prepared by M.Nakh!1a, NetEng, Platforms Engg. 1 Today‘s Date June 17"" 2011

EXHIBIT B INTELSAT LICENSE LLC 1.0 METER KU—BAND EARTH STATION HAGERSTOWN, MARYLAND JUNE 27, 2011

Exhibit B Radiation Hazard Report Page 1 of 5 Analysis of Non—lonizing Radiation for a 1.0—Meter Earth Station System This report analyzes the non—lonizing radiation levels for a 1.0—meter earth station system. The analysis and calculations performed in this report comply with the methods described in the FCC Office of Engineering and Technology Bulletin, No. 65 first published in 1985 and revised in 1997 in Edition 97—01. The radiation safety limits used in the analysis are in conformance with the FCC R&O 96—326. Bulletin No. 65 and the FCC R&O specifies that there are two separate tiers of exposure limits that are dependant on the situation in which the exposure takes place and/or the status of the individuals who are subject to the exposure. The Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) limits for persons in a General Population/Uncontrolled environment are shown in Table 1. The General Population/Uncontrolled MPE is a function of transmit frequency and is for an exposure period of thirty minutes or less. The MPE limits for persons in an Occupational/Controlled environment are shown in Table 2. The Occupational MPE is a function of transmit frequency and is for an exposure period of six minutes or less. The purpose of the analysis described in this report is to determine the power flux density levels of the earth station in the far—field, near—feld, transition region, between the subreflector or feed and main reflector surface, at the main reflector surface, and between the antenna edge and the ground and to compare these levels to the specified MPEs. Table 1. Limits for General Population/Uncontrolled Exposure (MPE) Frequency Range (MHz) __Power Density (mW/icm") 30—300 0.2 300—1500 Frequency (MHz)*(0.8/1200) 1500—100,000 1.0 Table 2. Limits for Occupational/Controlled Exposure (MPE) Frequency Range (MHz) Power Density (mWicm") 30—300 1.0 300—1500 Frequency (MHz)*(4.0/1200) 1500—100,000 5.0 Table 3. Formulas and Parameters Used for Determining Power Flux Densities Parameter Symbol Formula Value Units Antenna Diameter D Input 1.0 m Antenna Surface Area Asurface x D/ 4 0.79 m Feed Flange Diameter Di Input 19.0 cm Area of Feed Flange Ala r De 4 283.53 cm* Frequency F Input 14250 MHz Wavelength A 300/F 0.021053 m Transmit Power P Input 8.00 W Antenna Gain (dBi) Ges Input 41. dBi Antenna Gain (factor) G 1969 . 12882.5 n/a Pi T Constant 3.1415927 nia Antenna Efficiency 1 Gr(rD") 0.58 n/a

Exhibit B Radiation Hazard Report Page 2 of 5 1. Far Field Distance Calculation The distance to the beginning of the far field can be determined from the following equation: Distance to the Far Field Region Rf =0.60 D/A (1) =28.5 m The maximum main beam power density in the far field can be determined from the following equation: On—Axis Power Density in the Far Field S; =GP/(4 1 Rg") (2) =10.097 W/m* =1.010 mW/cm* 2. Near Field Calculation Power flux density is considered to be at a maximum value throughout the entire length of the defined Near Field region. The region is contained within a cylindrical volume having the same diameter as the antenna. Past the boundary of the Near Field region, the power density from the antenna decreases linearly with respect to increasing distance. The distance to the end of the Near Field can be determined from the following equation: Extent of the Near Field Ry = D/ (4 2) (3) =11.9 m The maximum power density in the Near Field can be determined from the following equation: Near Field Power Density Sir =16.0 1 P / (1 D°) (4) =23.571 W/m* =2.357 mW/icm* 3. Transition Region Calculation The Transition region is located between the Near and Far Field regions. The power density begins to decrease linearly with increasing distance in the Transition region. While the power density decreases inversely with distance in the Transition region, the power density decreases inversely with the square of the distance in the Far Field region. The maximum power density in the Transition region will not exceed that calculated for the Near Field region. The power density calculated in Section 1 is the highest power density the antenna can produce in any of the regions away from the antenna. The power density at a distance R, can be determined from the following equation: Transition Region Power Density S = Si Ra/ Re (5) = 2.357 mW/icm*

Exhibit B Radiation Hazard Report Page 3 of 5 4. Region between the Feed Assembly and the Antenna Reflector Transmissions from the feed assembly are directed toward the antenna reflector surface, and are confined within a conical shape defined by the type of feed assembly. The most common feed assemblies are waveguide flanges, horns or subreflectors. The energy between the feed assembly and reflector surface can be calculated by determining the power density at the feed assembly surface. This can be determined from the following equation: Power Density at the Feed Flange Sp = 4000 P / Ag (6) = 112.863 mW/cm* 5. Main Reflector Region The power density in the main reflector is determined in the same manner as the power density at the feed assembly. The area is now the area of the reflector aperture and can be determined from the following equation: Power Density at the Reflector Surface Ssurtace 4 P / Asurtace (7) =40.744 Wim = 4.074 mW/cm® 6. Region between the Reflector and the Ground Assuming unfform iflumination of the reflector surface, the power density between the antenna and the ground can be determined from the following equation: Power Density between Reflector and Ground Sy P / Asurface (8) it 10.186 W/im* dn 4 .019 mW/cm®

Exhibit B Radiation Hazard Report Page 4 of 5 7. Summary of Calculations Table 4. Summary of Expected Radiation levels for Uncontrolled Environment Calculated Maximum Radiation Power Density Level Region (mWicm‘) Hazard Assessment 1. Far Field (R§ = 28.5 m) S¢ 1.010 Potential Hazard 2. Near Field (Ry;=11.9 m) Sre 2.357 Potential Hazard 3. Transition Region (Ry < R, < R;) S; 2.357 Potenfial Hazard 4. Between Feed Assembly and Sm 112.863 Potential Hazard Antenna Reflector 5. Main Reflector Scurface 4.074 Potential Hazard 6. Between Reflector and Ground Sq 1.019 Potential Hazard Table 5. Summary of Expected Radiation levels for Controlled Environment Calculated Maximum Radiation Power Density Region Level (mWIcmz) Hazard Assessment 1. Far Field (R;= 28.5 m) S¢ 1.010 Satisfies FCC MPE 2. Near Field (Ry=11.9 m) Sn 2.357 Satisfies FCC MPE 3. Transition Region (Ry <R, < Ry) S; 2.357 Satisfies FCC MPE 4. Between Feed Assembly and Sm 112.863 Potential Hazard Antenna Reflector 5. Main Reflector Scurface 4.074 Satisfies FCC MPE 6. Between Reflector and Ground S 1.019 Satisfies FCC MPE It is the applicant‘s responsibility to ensure that the public and operational personnel are not exposed to harmful levels of radiation.

Exhibit B Radiation Hazard Report Page 5 of 5 8. Conclusions Based upon the above analysis, it is concluded that harmful levels of radiation may exist in those regions noted for the Uncontrolied (Table 4) Environment. The antenna will be installed at Intelsat, LLC‘s teleport facility in Hagerstown, Maryland. The teleport is a gated and fenced facility with secured access in and around the proposed antenna. The earth station will be marked with the standard radiation hazard warnings, as well as the area in the vicinity of the earth station to inform those in the general population, who might be working or otherwise present in or near the direct path of the main beam. The applicant will ensure that the main beam of the antenna will be pointed at least one diameter away from any building, or other obstacles in those areas that exceed the MPE levels. Since one diameter removed from the center of the main beam the levels are down at least 20 dB, or by a factor of 100, these potential hazards do not exist for either the public, or for earth station personnel. Finally, the earth station‘s operating personnel will not have access to areas that exceed the MPE levels, while the earth station is in operation. The transmitter will be turned off during periods of maintenance, so that the MPE standard of 5.0 mw/cm**2 will be complied with for those regions in close proximity to the main reflector, which could be occupied by operating personnel. The applicant agrees to abide by the conditions specified in Condition 5208 provided below: Condition 5208 — The licensee shall take all necessary measures to ensure that the antenna does not create potential exposure ofhumans to radiofrequency radiation in excess of the FCC exposure limits defined in 47 CFR 1.1307(b) and 1.1310 wherever such exposures might occur, Measures must be taken to ensure compliance with limits for both occupational/controlled exposure andfor general population/uncontrolled exposure, as defined in these rule sections. Compliance can be accomplished in most cases by appropriate restrictions such asfencing. Requirements for restrictions can be determined by predictions based on calculations, modeling or by field measurements. The FCC‘s OET Bulletin 65 (available on—line at www,fec.gov/oet/rfsafety) provides information on predicting exposure levels and on methods for ensuring compliance, including the use of warning and alerting signs and protective equipmentfor worker.

EXHIBIT C INTELSAT LICENSE LLC 1.0 METER KU—BAND EARTH STATION HAGERSTOWN, MARYLAND JUNE 27, 2011

KI\IS erregeggent 1314 Gwangpyeong—Dong, Yuseong—gu, DaeJeon South Korea ! Tel: +82—42—932—0351 Fax:82—10—9786—8615 Declaration of KNS Inc. 1. KNS Inc. designs, manufactures, and resells/distributes stabilized VSAT terminals, which are then used by our customers for their VSAT/ESV networks. 2. KNS Inc. hereby declares the antenna listed below will meet § 25.218 with the specified operating condition with demonstration of (f(1),(2). Model Operating Condition 1.0Meter Ku—band, N=1 Model SuperTrack Z10Mk2 Max. input power spectral density = —18.4dBW/4KHz 3. KNS Inc. hereby declares a pointing error will be less than or equal to 0.2degree between the orbital location of the target satellite and the axis of the main lobe of the antenna. Company : KNS Inc. Title : Chief Executive Officer Name : Byungwook Jin. 434 Date : 27—June—2011 Signature: Kevin in ,cfié’


Document Created: 2019-04-21 17:40:22
Document Modified: 2019-04-21 17:40:22
© 2025 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC