Attachment Data Technology Solu

This document pretains to SES-STA-20091203-01539 for Special Temporal Authority on a Satellite Earth Station filing.

IBFS_SESSTA2009120301539_842425

                                Federal Communications Commission
(((,'))                               Washington, flC. 20554


                                                                                                       DA 10-1747



                                                  September 15, 2010

    Raul Magallances, Esq.
    The Law Office of Raul Magallanes, PLLC
    P.O. Box 1213
    Houston, TX 77549

                                          Re: Call Sign E090 138
                                          File No: SES-LIC-20090807-00971


    Dear Mr. Magallanes:

On August 7, 2009, Data Technology Solutions (DTS) filed the above-captioned earth station
application to operate a network of Earth Stations on-board Vessels (ESVs). The proposed
network consists of 250 0.6-meter AZU-06 antenna terminals operating in the conventional Ku-
band throughout the United States) Pursuant to Section 25.11 2(a)(1) of the Commission's rules,
47 C.F.R. § 25.1 12(a)(1), we dismiss the application as defective without prejudice to refihing.2

Section 25.112 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 25.112, requires the Commission to
return, as unacceptable for filing, any earth station application that is not substantially complete,
contains internal inconsistencies, or does not substantially comply with the Commission's rules.
DTS' application is internally inconsistent, which renders it unacceptable and subject to
dismissal. The deficiencies are as follows:

We cannot determine the proposed emission power of the ESV due to inconsistencies among the
proposed maximum EIRP density per carrier listed in the Schedule B of the application and the
average EIRP density calculated from other parameters. Specifically, for the IM1OG7W
emission, DTS indicates the maximum EIRP density per carrier for the ESV is -24.9 dBW/4kHz
(Question E49). However, we calculate an average value of +12.2 dBW/4kHz as derived from
the maximum EIRP per carrier of 36.6 dBW (Question E48) and 1 .10 megahertz necessary
bandwidth (Question E47). Similarly, for the 1M76G7W emission, DTS indicates that the
maximum EIRP density per carrier for the ESV is -24.9 dBW/4kHz (Question E49). This value is
less than the average value of +1 0.5 dBW/4kHz as derived from the maximum EIRP per carrier
of 36.9 dBW (Question E48) and 1.76 megahertz necessary bandwidth (Question E47).
Furthermore, for the 4M41G7W emission, DTS indicates that the maximum EIRP density per
carrier for the ESV is -24.9 dBW/4kHz (Question E49). This value is less than the average value


      11.7-12.2 0Hz and 14.0-14.5 0Hz.
2    If DTS refiles an application identical to the one dismissed, with the exception of supplying the corrected
information, it need not pay an application fee. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1111(d).


                                 Federal Communications Commission                   DA 1 O1 747


of +10.2 dBW/4kHz as derived from the maximum EIRP per carrier of 40.64 dBW (Question
E48) and 4.41 megahertz necessary bandwidth (Question E47).

Accordingly, pursuant to Section 25.1 12(a)(l) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §
25.1 12(a)(1), and Section 0.261 of the Commission's rules on delegations of authority, 47 C.F.R.
§ 0.261, we dismiss the application as defective without prejudice to refihing.


                                                     Sincerely,




                                                    Kathyni Medl}
                                                    Chief, Satellite Engineering Branch
                                                    Satellite Division
                                                    International Bureau




                                               2



Document Created: 2010-09-29 15:57:19
Document Modified: 2010-09-29 15:57:19

© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC