Attachment Opposition

Opposition

OPPOSITION TO PETITION TO DENY submitted by MVS USA, Inc.

Opposition

2007-02-22

This document pretains to SES-STA-20070205-00192 for Special Temporal Authority on a Satellite Earth Station filing.

IBFS_SESSTA2007020500192_551503

                                      Before the
                         FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
                                          Washington, P.C. 205SFILED/ACCEFS
                                                                                                       RAMP AND RETURN
                                                                              FEB 2 2 2007
                                                                       Federal Communications Commission
In the matter of                                                             Office of the Secrotary

MVS USA, Inc.                                 File No. SES—STA—20070205—00192 (Call Sign EO50348)



                               OPPOSITION TO PETITION TO DENY


         MVS USA, Inc. ("MVS USA") hereby responds to the Petition to Deny filed by MSV in

this proceeding, in which MVS USA seeks renewal of special temporary authority ("STA") to

continue providing Inmarsat Broadband Global Area Network ("BGAN") service. MSV raises

no new substantive issues in its Petition to Deny, but rather repeats the same request it has made

in opposing the numerous STA applications that have been filed by MVS USA and the other

nascent BGAN providers. Specifically, MSV asks the Commission to: (i) adopt conditions

sought in MSV‘s June 12, 2006 Petition for Clarification; (ii) establish a firm expiration date for

the BGAN STA; (iii) require MVS USA to disclose the number of BGAN terminals in operation;

and (iv) limit BGAN terminal use to only a subset of emergency responders.

         In its prior pleadings responding to the same arguments from MSV, MVS USA has fully

answered each of MSV‘s requests and has addressed all substantive issues related to this

proceeding. MVS USA incorporates those prior pleadings by reference.‘ For the reasons


!       See Joint Opposition, File Nos. SES—STA—20060310—00419 et aZ. (filed June 19, 2006) (responding to
MSV‘s June 12, 2006 Petition for Clarification); Joint Letter from BGAN Licensees to Marlene Dortch, FCC, File
Nos. SES—LFS—20050826—01175, et al. (filed Dec. 6, 2006) (responding to an MSV ex parte letter seeking additional
conditions on existing STAs); see also Joint Letter from Licensees, Inmarsat, et al. to Marlene Dortch, FCC, File
Nos. SES—MFS—20051122—01614 et al. (Jul. 6, 2006) (responding to MSV‘s request to add three conditions to
pending applications to communicate with I—4); Joint Letter from the Licensees, Inmarsat, et al. (Jul. 6, 2006)
(responding to MSV‘s letter request that the Commission add conditions to existing conditions to provide Inmarsat
services).


 discussed therein, the Commission can and should renew the STA without delay, without adding

to, or modifying, the conditions pursuant to which BGAN service is currently provided.

          Because the instant application was filed more than sixty days after the last request for

extension of the initially filed STA, MSV requests that the Bureau treat this refiewal application

as an initial application for an STA. In so doing, however, MSV has simply attempted to elevate

form over substance in the hopes of getting a different forum in which to air its opposition. As

MSV well knows, MVS USA has a regulatory application pending, received a grant of STA in

July 2006, timely requested a renewal of the authorization it was granted (which remains

pending), and has filed several subsequent renewal applications prior to the expiration of each

subsequent 60 day period, although all such applications remain in pending status." MVS USA

has duly operated and provided service to customers consistent with, and remains subject to, the

conditions under which its original STA was granted by the Bureau, and here seeks no authority

beyond the scope of that originally—granted STA." In short, whether the instant application is

treated as an appropriate request for extension of existing authority or as a request for new

authority when the instant authorization lapses, grant of MVS USA‘s application is consistent

with Section 309(c)(2)(G) of the Act and Sections 25.120(a) and (b)(3) of the Commission‘s

rules, and nothing in the Commission‘s rules compels the Bureau to determine otherwise.




2         MVS USA timely requested its renewal "at least 3 working days prior to the date of ... the expiration date
of the existing temporary authorization." See 47 C.F.R. § 25.120(a). This and all subsequent renewal requests
remain pending. See 5 U.S.C. § 558(c) ("When the licensee has made timely and sufficient application for a renewal
or a new license in accordance with agency rules, a license with reference to an activity of a continuing nature does
not expire until the application has been finally determined by the agency.").
>         MVS USA has not been apprised of the existence of any actual harmful interference concerns from L—Band
or other operators; the company will, of course, cooperate with Inmarsat to address any concerns that may arise in
the future.


                    Respectfully submitted,



                     oo
                    Lawrence J. Movshin       (   '
                    Robert G. Morse
                    WILEKINSON BARKER KNAUER, LLP
                    2300 N Street, NW
                    Suite 700 _
                    Washington, D.C. 20037
                    Counsel to MVS USA, Inc.



February 22, 2007


                                 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE


        I, Paula Lewis, a secretary with the law firm of Wilkinson Barker Knauer, LLP, hereby
certify that on this 22"" day of February 2007, I served a true copy of the foregoing by first—class
United States mail, postage prepaid, upon the following:


Robert Nelson*                                     John Martin*®
International Bureau                               International Bureau
Federal Communications Commission                  Federal Communications Commission
445 12"" Street, S.W.                              445 12"" Street, S.W.
Washington, DC 20554                               Washington, DC 20554

Scott Kotler*®                                     Kathryn Medley*
International Bureau                               International Bureau
Federal Communications Commission                  Federal Communications Commission
445 12"" Street, S.W.                              445 12"" Street, S.W.
Washington, DC 20554                               Washington, DC 20554

Andrea Kelly*                                      Stephen Duall*
International Bureau                               International Bureau
Federal Communications Commission                  Federal Communications Commission
445 12"" Street, S.W.                              445 12"" Street, S.W.
Washington, DC 20554                               Washington, DC 20554

Bruce D. Jacobs                                    Jennifer A. Manner
David S. Konczal                                   Vice President, Regulatory Affairs
Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP                Mobile Satellite Ventures Subsidiary LLC
2300 N Street, NW                                  10802 Parkridge Boulevard
Washington, DC 20037—1128                          Reston, VA 20191




                                                      <—P(7V\)lfl\   u\/\fl S      M
                                                      Paula Lewis



*By Electronic Mail



Document Created: 2019-04-24 01:57:02
Document Modified: 2019-04-24 01:57:02

© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC