Attachment Technical Appendix

This document pretains to SES-MOD-20170228-00210 for Modification on a Satellite Earth Station filing.

IBFS_SESMOD2017022800210_1189772

United Teleports Modification Application ASC Signal 6.5m Gateway Earth Station Technical Appendix I. Supplemental Schedule S Technical Information II. ASC Signal 6.5m Radiation Hazard Study III. FCC Letter to ANATEL IV. Frequency Coordination Notice V. Engineer Certification 1

I. Supplemental Schedule S Technical Information 1. PURPOSE AND SCOPE The purpose of this Attachment is to provide the Commission with the technical characteristics of the EUTELSAT 65 WEST A (“E65WA”) satellite in support of the earth station application filed by United Teleports. This attachment, prepared with the cooperation of the satellite operator Eutelsat do Brasil LTDA (“Eutelsat”), contains information required by the Commission that cannot be entered online into the Schedule S submission. 2. GENERAL DESCRIPTION Eutelsat operates the E65WA satellite at the nominal 65° W.L. location. The satellite is capable of providing a wide range of FSS services using the C-, Ku- and Ka-bands. For purposes of the instant application, U.S. market access is being sought only for the Appendix 30B C-band uplink frequencies. Accordingly, only the characteristics of the C- band payload are described herein and in the Schedule S submission. The C-band frequencies used by the satellite are the International Telecommunications Union (“ITU”) Appendix 30B bands: the 6725-7025 MHz uplink band and the 4500- 4800 MHz downlink band. The satellite employs ten 54 MHz C-band transponders. There are two cross-polarized C-band beams in the uplink direction and two cross- polarized C-band beams in the downlink direction. 3. FREQUENCY PLAN AND POLARIZATION The E65WA satellite’s C-band frequency and polarization plan are provided in the associated Schedule S submission. The satellite provides full frequency reuse as required by Section 25.210(f) of the Commission’s rules, 47 C.F.R. § 25.210(f). The satellite’s C-band frequency plan is provided below. 2

4. SPACE STATION TRANSMIT & RECEIVE CAPABILITIES The transmit and receive antenna gain contours of the satellite’s C-band beams are provided in GXT format and are embedded in the associated Schedule S submission. The maximum EIRP and EIRP densities for the downlink beams are listed in Table 1. Also listed are the maximum and minimum saturating flux-density (“SFD”) levels, referenced at the 0 dB/K contour, for the uplink beams. Table 1. Maximum Downlink EIRP and EIRP Densities. Maximum and Minimum SFD’s. Maximum Maximum Downlink Downlink Maximum SFD Minimum SFD Beam EIRP EIRP Density (dBW/m2) (dBW/m2) (dBW) (dBW/4kHz) CTX 43.08 2.5 CRX -76 (@ 0 dB/K -96 (@ 0 dB/K contour) contour) In addition, uplink transmissions from the US territory towards the E65WA satellite will not exceed an input power density of -57.1 dBW/Hz. The E65WA satellite network will be operated in a manner consistent with ITU coordination agreements reached by Brazil. 3

5. ARRANGEMENT FOR TELEMETRY, TRACKING & COMMUNICATIONS The arrangements for telemetry, tracking and command (“TT&C”) will be as informed in the submission for authorization to provide Ku-band services on the same satellite, filed in File No. SES-LIC-20160513-00427. 6. POWER FLUX DENSITY ANALYSIS The Commission’s Part 25 rules do not contain power flex density (“PFD”) limits applicable to the ITU Appendix 30B downlink 4 GHz band. However, it is noted that Article 21 of the ITU Radio Regulations includes PFD limits that are applicable to GSO satellites using this band. Table 2 shows the PFD levels that will occur at various angles of arrival for the downlink beams when transmitting with a maximum downlink EIRP density of 2 . 5 dBW/4kHz. This table demonstrates compliance with the ITU’s Article 21 PFD limits. Table 2. Maximum PFD Levels of Transmit Beams Applicable PFD Worst Case PFD PFD Margin Angle of Spreading Loss Worst Case Limit for Angle of (dBW/m2) Level at Angle of Arrival Gain Contour Arrival Arrival (dB) (dB) (dBW/m2/4 kHz) (dBW/m2/4 kHz) 0° -152.0 -163.4 -2.0 -162.9 10.9 5° -152.0 -163.3 -2.0 -162.8 10.8 10° -149.5 -163.2 -2.0 -162.7 13.2 15° -147.0 -163.0 -2.0 -162.5 15.5 20° -144.5 -162.9 -2.0 -162.4 17.9 25° -142.0 -162.8 -2.0 -162.3 20.3 61.4° -142.0 -162.2 0.0 -159.7 17.7 (Peak) This information is provided for completeness; United Teleports does not seek to downlink from the E65WA satellite in the United States. 7. TWO-DEGREE COMPATIBILITY ANALYSIS This section demonstrates that the E65WA satellite network’s operations are two-degree 4

compatible. Currently there are no operational C-band satellites two degrees away from the nominal 65° W.L. location using the Appendix 30B bands, nor are there any pending applications before the Commission requesting to use the Appendix 30B C-bands at a location two degrees or less from the nominal 65° W.L. location. In order to demonstrate two-degree compatibility, the transmission parameters of the E65WA satellite network have been used as both the wanted and interfering transmissions. Table 3 provides typical transmission parameters used by the E65WA satellite network which were used in the interference analysis. Table 4 shows the results of the interference calculations in terms of the overall C/I margins. The interference calculations assume that the wanted and interfering carriers are co-polarized and all earth station antennas conform to a sidelobe pattern of 29-25 log(). The C/I calculations were performed on a per Hz basis. These tables indicate that all the C/I margins are positive, thereby demonstrating the two- degree compatibility of the E65WA satellite network. Table 3. Typical Transmission Parameters Carrier Emission Bandwidth Tx E/S Uplink Downlink Rx E/S C/I Criterion ID Designator (MHz) Gain EIRP EIRP (dBW) Gain (dB) (dBi) (dBW) (dBi) 1 45M0G7W 45.0 51.5 70.9 41.6 48.0 24.2 2 45M0G7W 45.0 51.5 69.9 40.5 48.0 24.2 3 30M0G7W 30.0 51.5 65.3 37.4 48.0 21.6 4 30M0G7W 30.0 51.5 65.3 36.3 48.0 21.6 Table 4. Summary of the overall link C/I margins (dB) VICTIM UPLINK BEAM INFORMATION Uplink Frequency Band (MHz) 6725-7025 6725-7025 6725-7025 6725-7025 Uplink Beam Peak G/T (dB/K) 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 INTERFERING DOWNLINK BEAM INFORMATION Downlink Frequency Band (MHz) 4500-4800 4500-4800 4500-4800 4500-4800 INTEREFRING CARRIER INFORMATION 5

Emission Designation 45M0G7W 45M0G7W 30M0G7W 30M0G7W Carrier Modulation QPSK QPSK QPSK QPSK Allocated Bandwidth(kHz) 45000 45000 30000 30000 Uplink Power Density (dBW/Hz) -57.1 -57.1 -61.0 -61.0 Downlink EIRP Density (dBW/Hz) -34.9 -34.9 -37.4 -37.4 VICTIM CARRIER INFORMATION Emission Designation 45M0G7W 30M0G7W 45M0G7W 30M0G7W Carrier Modulation QPSK QPSK QPSK QPSK Allocated Bandwidth(kHz) 45000 30000 45000 30000 Minimum Uplink EIRP (dBW) 69.9 65.3 69.9 65.3 Minimum Downlink EIRP (dBW) 40.5 36.3 40.5 36.3 INTERFERING UPLINK EARTH STATION Earth Station Diameter (meters) 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 Earth Station Gain (dBi) 51.5 51.5 51.5 51.5 VICTIM DOWNLINK EARTH STATION Earth Station Diameter (meters) 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 Earth Station Gain (dBi) 48.0 48.0 48.0 48.0 Earth Station G/T (dB/K) 29.2 29.2 29.2 29.2 COMPOSITE LINK PERFORMANCE Uplink Interference C/I (dB) 29.5 26.7 33.3 30.5 Downlink Interference C/I (dB) 25.9 23.5 28.3 25.9 Total C/I (dB) 24.3 21.8 27.1 24.6 C/I Required (dB) 24.2 21.6 24.2 21.6 Margin (dB) 0.1 0.2 2.9 3.0 8. ORBITAL DEBRIS MITIGATION PLAN The arrangements orbital debris mitigation will be as informed in the submission for authorization to provide Ku-band services on the same satellite, filed in File No. SES-LIC- 20160513-00427. 9. ITU Filings The E65WA satellite network operates under the following two ITU Appendix 30B filings: B-SAT-3R – AP30B/A6A/254 published in IFIC 2744. B-SAT-3R-1 – AP30B/A6A/333 published in IFIC 2774 6

II. ANALYSIS OF NON-IONIZING RADIATION for United Teleports Inc Site: Port Saint Lucie State: FL Latitude: 27 16 56.5 Longitude: 80 28 58.6 (NAD83) 02-27-2017 The Office of Science and Technology Bulletin, No. 65, October 1985 and revised August 1997, specifies that the maximum level of non-ionizing radiation that a person may be exposed to over a six minute period is an average power density equal to 5 mW/cm**2 (five milliwatts per centimeter squared) for a controlled environment. For an uncontrolled environment, the maximum level of non-ionizing radiation that a person may be exposed to over a thirty minute period is an average power density equal to 1 mW/cm**2 (one milliwatt per centimeter squared). It is the purpose of this report to determine the maximum power flux densities of the earth station in the far zone, near zone, transition zone, at the main reflector surface, and between the antenna edge and the ground. Parameters which were used in the calculations: =============================================== Antenna Diameter, (D) = 6.5000 m Antenna Surface Area (Sa) = pi(D**2)/4 = 33.1831 m**2 Wavelength at 6.8000 GHz (lambda) = 0.0441 m Transmit Power at Flange (P) = 88.0000 Watts Antenna Gain at Earth Site (GES) = 51.5000 dBi = 141253.7545 Power Ratio: AntiLog(GES/10) pi = 3.1415927 Antenna Aperture Efficiency (n) = 0.6000

1. FAR ZONE CALCULATIONS ======================== Distance to the Far Zone (Df) = (n)(D**2) = 574.8299 m --------- lambda Far Zone Power Density (Rf) = (GES)(P) = 2.9936 W/m**2 ------------ 4*pi*(Df**2) = 0.2994 mW/cm**2 2. NEAR ZONE CALCULATIONS ========================= Power Flux Density is considered to be at a maximum value throughout the entire length of this Zone. The Zone is contained within a cylindrical volume which has the same diameter as the antenna. Beyond the Near Zone, the Power Flux Density will decrease with distance from the Antenna. Distance to the Near Zone (Dn) = D**2 = 239.5125 m -------- 4*lambda Near Zone Power Density (Rn) = 16.0(n)P = 6.3647 W/m**2 -------- pi(D**2) = 0.6365 mW/cm**2 3. TRANSITION ZONE CALCULATIONS =============================== The Power Density begins to decrease with distance in the Transition Zone. While the Power Density decreases inversely with distance in the Transition Zone, the Power Density decreases inversely with the square of the distance in the Far Zone. Since the maximum Power Density in the Transition Zone will not exceed the Near Zone values, it is not calculated.

4. MAIN REFLECTOR ZONE ====================== Main Reflector Power Density = 2(P) = 5.3039 W/m**2 ---- Sa = 0.5304 mW/cm**2 5. ZONE BETWEEN THE MAIN REFLECTOR AND THE GROUND ================================================= Applying uniform illumination of the Main Reflector Surface: Main to Ground Power Density = P = 2.6520 W/m**2 ---- Sa = 0.2652 mW/cm**2

CALCULATED SAFETY MARGINS SUMMARY AND EVALUATION -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Controlled Safety Margin = 5.0 - Calculated Zone Value (mW/cm**2) -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Safety Zones Margins Conclusions (mW/cm**2) ---------------------------- ------------ ---------------------------- 1. Far Zone 4.7006 Complies with ANSI 2. Near Zone 4.3635 Complies with ANSI 3. Transition Zone Rf < Rt < Rn Complies with ANSI 4. Main Reflector Surface 4.4696 Complies with ANSI 5. Main Reflector to Ground 4.7348 Complies with ANSI -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Uncontrolled Safety Margin = 1.0 - Calculated Zone Value (mW/cm**2) -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Safety Zones Margins Conclusions (mW/cm**2) ---------------------------- ------------ ---------------------------- 1. Far Zone 0.7006 Complies with ANSI 2. Near Zone 0.3635 Complies with ANSI 3. Transition Zone Rf < Rt < Rn Complies with ANSI 4. Main Reflector Surface 0.4696 Complies with ANSI 5. Main Reflector to Ground 0.7348 Complies with ANSI 6. EVALUATION ============== A. Controlled Environment B. Uncontrolled Environment All Zones comply with ANSI Standards.

III. FCC Letter to ANATEL FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION INTERNATIONAL BUREAU WASHINGTON, D.C. 20554 fax: +1 202 418 1208; TWX: 710 822 0160 In reply,refer to: 800C2/SEB16174 Telefax message: To: Agência Nacional de Telecomunicações - ANATEL Assessoria Internacional SAUS-Quadra 6 - Bloco H - 4th Floor 70070-940 BRASILIA, DF Brazil TELEFAX NO.: 011 + 55 61 23122244 C CC: ITU Radiocommunication Bureau Geneva, Switzerland Telefax no.: 41 22 730 5785 Date: 27 April 2016 Subject: Agreement under §6.6 of Article 6 of Appendix 30B References: 1) Special Section AP30B/A6A/333, BRIFIC 2744 dated 22.07.2014, concerning the B-SAT-3R-1 satellite network. 2) Our letter 800C2/SEB14393, dated 30.10.2014 3) Your letter CT. n°163/ORER-Anatel dated 25.09.2015 The US administration thanks the administration of Brazil for its request for agreement regarding the operation of the B-SAT-3R-1 satellite network in the 6725-7025 MHz (Earth to space) and 4500-4800 MHz (space to Earth), 10.70-10.95 GHz (space to Earth), 11.20-11.45 GHz (space to Earth) and 12.75-13.25 GHz (Earth to space) planned bands of APP30B. The US administration is pleased to provide its agreement under the provision §6.6 of Appendix 30B for inclusion of its territory in the service area of the B-SAT-3R-1 satellite network. However, this agreement does not guarantee market access to the US. Any earth station located within US territory seeking to communicate with the B-SAT-3R-1 satellite network must first be licensed in accordance with US laws and regulations. Any operation of the satellites would be in accordance with international Radio Regulations and relevant provisions. Any such license application may or may not be granted. REGARDS FEDCOMCOM SATELLITE DIVISION Direct Fax No.: +1 202 418 1208 (preferred) or +1 202 418 0398 (alternative) Email: IBmail@fcc.gov Authorized: J. Payton International Bureau/SD ****** 7

IV. Frequency Coordination Notice Micronet Communications, Inc. 720 F Avenue, Suite 100 Plano, Texas 75074 972-422-7200 SUPPLEMENTAL SHOWING PART 101.103(D) File Number: M1700303 6.72 GHz Licensee: United Teleports Inc Page 1 _____________________________________________________________________________________ Pursuant to Parts 25.203 and 101.103(d) of the FCC Rules and Regulations, a frequency coordination study was conducted by Micronet Communications, Inc. for the following proposed earth station: Port Saint Lucie, FL The results of the study indicate that no unacceptable interference will result with existing, proposed or prior coordinated radio facilities. Coordination was performed with existing, proposed and prior coordinated carriers within coordination range on the following dates: 02/02/2017 Original PCN (Expedited response requested by 02/16/2017) There were no unresolved interference objections. The attached coordination data was forwarded on the latest date to the following parties within coordination range or their authorized coordination agents: BREVARD COMMUNITY COLLEGE BREVARD, COUNTY OF BROWARD COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CITY OF CORAL SPRINGS COMSEARCH INC FLORIDA, STATE OF HARRIS CORPORATION HIGHLANDS COUNTY INDIAN RIVER, COUNTY OF MARTIN, COUNTY OF OSCEOLA COUNTY INTERGOVERNMENTAL COMMUNICATIONS PALM BEACH COUNTY OF PALM BEACH, COUNTY OF POLK, COUNTY OF RADIO DYNAMICS SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT VERIZON WIRELESS PERSONAL COMMUNICATIONS LP WEST PALM BEACH, CITY OF Respectfully Submitted, Jeremy Lewis Systems Engineer Attached: 1 data sheet

Micronet Communications, Inc. 720 F Avenue, Suite 100 Plano, Texas 75074 972-422-7200 File: M1700303 ========================================================================== TECHNICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF TRANSMIT ONLY EARTH STATION ========================================================================== Company: United Teleports Inc Site Name, State: Port Saint Lucie, FL Call Sign: E160081 Latitude (NAD83) 27 16 56.5 N Longitude (NAD83) 80 28 58.6 W Elevation AMSL (ft/m) 24.61 7.50 Receive Frequency Range (MHz) Transmit Frequency Range (MHz) 6725-7025 Range of Satellite Orbital Long. (deg W) 64.00 66.00 Range of Azimuths from North (deg) 147.16 150.60 Antenna Centerline (ft/m) 21.33 6.50 Antenna Elevation Angles (deg) 53.28 54.32 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Equipment Parameters Transmit -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Antenna Gain, Main Beam (dbI) 51.00 15 DB Half Beamwidth (deg) 0.84 Antennas Transmit: COMMSCOPE ES65-1 Max Transmitter Power (dbW/4KHz) -21.41 Max EIRP Main Beam (dbW/4KHz) 29.59 Modulation / Emission Designator DIGITAL 1M00G7W 36M0G7W 54M0G7W -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coordination Parameters Transmit -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Max Greater Circle Distances (km) 113.01 Max Rain Scatter Distances (km) 100.00 Max Interference Power Long Term (dbW) -154.00 Max Interference Power Short Term (dbW) -130.80 Rain Zone / Radio Zone 1 A

Horizon Angle & Satellite Arc for Port Saint Lucie, FL Micronet Communications, Inc. 90 Satellite Arc Horizon Angle 80 70 60 Elevation Angle (degrees) 30 40 20 10 0 50 0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 360 Earth Azimuth (degrees)

Horizon Gain for Port Saint Lucie, FL Micronet Communications, Inc. 30 20 10 Transmit Horizon Gain (decibels) -10 0 -20 -30 0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 360 Earth Azimuth (degrees)

Minimum Discrimination Angles for Port Saint Lucie, FL Micronet Communications, Inc. 180 160 140 120 Discrimination Angle (degrees) 40 60 80 20 0 100 0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 360 Earth Azimuth (degrees)

Final Contour & Rain Scatter for Port Saint Lucie, FL - Transmit Final Contour Rain Scatter 90 88 86 84 82 80 78 76 74 72 70 36 36 Nashville Memphis tle Rock Raleigh 34 34 Columbia Birmingham Atlanta Jackson Charleston 32 Montgomery 32 Savannah Baton Rouge Tallahassee Jacksonville 30 30 New Orleans Orlando 28 28 26 26 Miami 24 24 22 22 20 20 88 86 84 82 80 78 76 74 72 SCALE - 1:10000000 1 inch = 157.8 miles

Email to Coordinators Re: Coordination Notice Update -----Original Message----- From: jlewis@micronetcom.com [mailto:jlewis@micronetcom.com] Sent: Monday, February 27, 2017 1:40 PM To: cnalda@lmiadvisors.com Cc: jlewis@micronetcom.com; frequencyprotection@micronetcom.com Subject: PCN M1700303 - United Teleports Inc Enclosed is a copy of the Prior Coordination Notice sent to all affected carriers. Please let me know if you have any questions or if I can be of further assistance. RE: United Teleports Inc Micronet File Number(s): M1700303 Path Count: 1 State(s): FL Band(s): 6.7 *** Minor Modification - Satellite Earth Station *** Dear Coordinator: A radio frequency study of the above referenced system has been conducted and no interference problems were indicated. We are enclosing this frequency coordination notice for your review in compliance with the rules and regulations of the F.C.C., Part 25.203 (C). Please find attached the corresponding path data sheet(s) and click on the link below to view the system diagram in Google Earth (kmz file). www.micronetcom.com/pcn/E6B7F6 Please update your database accordingly with the underlined changes on the attached data sheets. This data change notification is for your information only, and no response is required. Please call if you should have any questions. Frequency Protection Micronet Communications, Inc. 720 F Ave Suite 100 Plano, TX 75074 (972) 422-7200 epcn@micronetcom.com Sincerely, Jeremy Lewis

(Coordination Change Notification) Micronet Communications, Inc. 720 F Avenue, Suite 100 Plano, Texas 75074 972-422-7200 SUPPLEMENTAL SHOWING PART 101.103(D) File Number: M1700303 6.72 GHz Licensee: United Teleports Inc Page 1 _____________________________________________________________________________________ Pursuant to Parts 25.203 and 101.103(d) of the FCC Rules and Regulations, a frequency coordination study was conducted by Micronet Communications, Inc. for the following proposed earth station: Port Saint Lucie, FL The results of the study indicate that no unacceptable interference will result with existing, proposed or prior coordinated radio facilities. Coordination was performed with existing, proposed and prior coordinated carriers within coordination range on the following dates: 02/27/2017 No-impact change notification pursuant to Section 101.103(d)(2)(ix) - No response required. 02/02/2017 Original PCN (Expedited response requested by 02/16/2017) There were no unresolved interference objections. The attached coordination data was forwarded on the latest date to the following parties within coordination range or their authorized coordination agents: BREVARD COMMUNITY COLLEGE BREVARD, COUNTY OF BROWARD COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CITY OF CORAL SPRINGS COMSEARCH INC FLORIDA, STATE OF HARRIS CORPORATION HIGHLANDS COUNTY INDIAN RIVER, COUNTY OF MARTIN, COUNTY OF OSCEOLA COUNTY INTERGOVERNMENTAL COMMUNICATIONS PALM BEACH COUNTY OF PALM BEACH, COUNTY OF POLK, COUNTY OF RADIO DYNAMICS SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT VERIZON WIRELESS PERSONAL COMMUNICATIONS LP WEST PALM BEACH, CITY OF

Micronet Communications, Inc. 720 F Avenue, Suite 100 Plano, Texas 75074 972-422-7200 SUPPLEMENTAL SHOWING PART 101.103(D) File Number: M1700303 6.72 GHz Licensee: United Teleports Inc Page 2 _____________________________________________________________________________________ Respectfully Submitted, Jeremy Lewis Systems Engineer Attached: 1 data sheet

Micronet Communications, Inc. 720 F Avenue, Suite 100 Plano, Texas 75074 972-422-7200 File: M1700303 ========================================================================== TECHNICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF TRANSMIT ONLY EARTH STATION ========================================================================== Company: United Teleports Inc Site Name, State: Port Saint Lucie, FL Call Sign: E160081 Latitude (NAD83) 27 16 56.5 N Longitude (NAD83) 80 28 58.6 W Elevation AMSL (ft/m) 24.61 7.50 Receive Frequency Range (MHz) Transmit Frequency Range (MHz) 6725-7025 Range of Satellite Orbital Long. (deg W) 64.00 66.00 Range of Azimuths from North (deg) 147.16 150.60 Antenna Centerline (ft/m) 21.33 6.50 Antenna Elevation Angles (deg) 53.28 54.32 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Equipment Parameters Transmit -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Antenna Gain, Main Beam (dbI) 51.50 15 DB Half Beamwidth (deg) 0.84 Antennas Transmit: COMMSCOPE ES65-1 Max Transmitter Power (dbW/4KHz) -21.10 Max EIRP Main Beam (dbW/4KHz) 30.40 Modulation / Emission Designator DIGITAL 45M0G7W 30M0G7W -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coordination Parameters Transmit -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Max Greater Circle Distances (km) 113.61 Max Rain Scatter Distances (km) 100.00 Max Interference Power Long Term (dbW) -154.00 Max Interference Power Short Term (dbW) -130.80 Rain Zone / Radio Zone 1 A

V. CERTIFICATION OF PERSON RESPONSIBLE FOR PREPARING ENGINEERING INFORMATION I hereby certify that I am the technically qualified person responsible for preparation of the engineering information contained in this application, that I am familiar with Part 25 of the Commission’s rules that I have either prepared or reviewed the engineering information submitted in this application, and that it is complete and accurate to the best of my knowledge and belief. /s/ ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ Humberto Hennriques Telecomm Strategies February 27, 2017 9


Document Created: 2017-02-28 07:48:34
Document Modified: 2017-02-28 07:48:34
© 2025 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC