Verizon ex parte Via

COMMENT submitted by Verizon

Informal Comments

2016-04-13

This document pretains to SES-MOD-20160108-00029 for Modification on a Satellite Earth Station filing.

IBFS_SESMOD2016010800029_1133566

                                              Christopher D. Oatway       1300 I. Street, N.W.
                                              Assistant General Counsel   Suite 400 West
                                                                          Washington, DC 20005

                                                                          christopher.d.oatway@verizon.com
                                                                          T: 202-515-2470
                                                                          F: 202-289-6781



April 13, 2016

Ex Parte

Ms. Marlene H. Dortch
Secretary
Federal Communications Commission
445 12th Street SW
Washington, DC 20554

Re:    ViaSat Earth Station Modification Application to Add Use of
       28.1-28.35 GHz (IBFS File No. SES-MOD-20160108-00029; Call
       Sign E120075); Use of Spectrum Bands Above 24 GHz for
       Mobile Radio Services, GN Docket No. 14-177, IB Dkt. Nos. 15-
       256 & 97-95, RM-11664 & WT Dkt. No. 10-112.


Dear Ms. Dortch:

        Verizon submits these comments under 47 C.F.R. § 25.154(b) regarding the
above-captioned application by ViaSat to modify its blanket license for Ka-band
aeronautical earth stations in the fixed satellite service (“FSS”) to allow aeronautical
uplink use of the 28.1-28.35 GHz band, which is designated for Local Multipoint
Distribution Service (“LMDS”) operations on a primary basis.1 In seeking new
authority and a waiver of Commission rules, ViaSat does not analyze whether and to
what extent its proposal may create interference risks for the mobile terrestrial
operations that the Commission has proposed to authorize in the 28 GHz band.2
The Commission therefore should request that ViaSat provide technical information
sufficient to fully understand that issue, and should evaluate it in the Spectrum
Frontiers proceeding, where satellite-terrestrial coexistence issues are being
addressed.

        As part of the Spectrum Frontiers proceeding, Verizon supports Commission
efforts to seek a solution that would permit satellite operators and terrestrial mobile
services to coexist in the 28 GHz band. Verizon and other terrestrial stakeholders
are working with the satellite industry, including ViaSat, to mutually understand the
interference issues and to explore a workable coexistence regime. But that technical
work has been focused on fixed gateway earth stations, not on the unique issues
raised by potentially introducing thousands of new, moving earth stations into this
band.
1
 ViaSat Application, IBFS File No. SES-MOD-20160108-00029 (filed Jan. 8, 2016).
2
 See Use of Spectrum Bands Above 24 GHz for Mobile Radio Services, Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking, 30 FCC Rcd 11878 (2015), ¶¶ 30-34 (“Spectrum Frontiers NPRM”).


Ms. Marlene H. Dortch
April 13, 2016
Page 2



        ViaSat states that its proposed operations would not cause harmful
interference to LMDS point-to-point operations.3 But its analysis is insufficient to
analyze whether ViaSat’s moving earth stations would pose a threat to future
terrestrial mobile operations. For example, ViaSat does not provide information
sufficient to understand and evaluate any potential interference into ground
operations when airplanes carrying ViaSat’s proposed earth stations roll while
turning in the air. ViaSat does not cite any Commission precedent authorizing
aeronautical earth stations at 28 GHz, or any previous finding that such mobile
aeronautical operations would not cause harmful interference to terrestrial
operations.

       The Commission should thus refrain from acting on ViaSat’s petition until it
has considered the impact of existing and future FSS earth station operations on the
new flexible-use services it proposes to authorize in the 28 GHz band. If the
Commission instead decides to grant ViaSat’s application prior to completing its
assessment in the pending Spectrum Frontiers rulemaking, it should make clear that
any ViaSat investments to deploy such new operations on a secondary basis would
not qualify for any grandfathering of “existing” operations when the rules for the
Upper Microwave Flexible Use Service are issued.



Sincerely,

/s/ Christopher D. Oatway
Christopher D. Oatway




3
    ViaSat Application, Technical Analysis, at 1.



Document Created: 2010-01-01 00:00:00
Document Modified: 2010-01-01 00:00:00

© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC