Attachment Exhibit B

This document pretains to SES-MOD-20130117-00057 for Modification on a Satellite Earth Station filing.

IBFS_SESMOD2013011700057_981731

Exhibit B Interference Analysis Report An Assessment of the Impact of Radiolocation Systems Operating in 3.1-3.7 GHz Band on Fixed Satellite Services Earth Station Receiver Prepared for Intelsat License LLC TRANSMIT-RECEIVE EARTH STATION (9.0 METER) FCC CALL SIGN: KA264 Site Name: Hagerstown, Maryland Prepared By December 3, 2012 19700 Janelia Farm Blvd.• Ashburn, VA 20147 USA • 703.726.5500

1.0 Introduction Interference calculations were performed to determine the potential for in-band and out-of-band interference from Radiolocation Systems operating in the 3.1 to 3.7 GHz band1. The geographical positions and operating parameters of these systems was derived from NTIA Document TR-99-3612. 2.0 Radiolocation Systems in the 3.1 – 3.7 GHz Band High powered mobile and fixed radar systems operated by the Federal Government operate in the 3.1 – 3.7 GHz band. These radars are used to search for and track near-surface and high-altitude airborne projectiles, sea surveillance, and airborne objects. The NTIA report referenced above has identified the locations for two types of systems: land-based and shipboard based. Also included in the report are the operating characteristics of these radars. There are two prevalent types of shipboard radars, denoted as type A and Type B, and one type of ground-based radar. An Airborne System radar is also specified. This analysis will concern itself with interference from the ground based and shipboard based radars based upon the relative operating positions and parameters specified in the NTIA report. A summary of the operating parameters for the shipboard and ground based radar systems is shown below: Table 1 – Technical Characteristics of 3.1-3.7 GHz Radiolocation Systems Characteristic Shipboard System A Shipboard System B Ground Based System Modulation P0N Q7N P0N Tuning Range (GHz) 3.5-3.7 3.1-3.5 3.1-3.4 Peak transmit Power 1 4 0.12 (MW) Pulse Width (µsec.) 1.0 3.5-51.2 10.75 Pulse Repetition Rate 1.125 0.152-6.0 2793.3-5050.51 (kHz) Duty Cycle (%) 0.001 0.8-2.0 0.041 Transmit 3-dB 4,16.6 4 1,10 Bandwidth (MHz) Antenna Type Reflector Phased Array Phase Scan Array Antenna Mainbeam 32 42 36 Gain (dBi) Antenna Centerline (m) 46 20 46 1 This report is being provided as required under Footnote US 245. 2 National Telecommunications and Information Administration, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, NTIA Report TR 99-361, TECHNICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF RADIOLOCATION SYSTEMS OPERATING IN THE 3.1-3.7 GHz BAND AND PROCEDURES FOR ASSESSING EMC WITH FIXED EARTH STATION RECEIVERS, (December 1999). Interference Analysis Report for Hagerstown, Maryland

3.0 Earth Station System Parameters The Fixed Satellite Service Earth Station’s operational parameters are shown in the Tables 2 and 3 below: TABLE 2 - SATELLITE EARTH STATION PARAMETERS AND COORDINATION DATA Administrative Information Status ENGINEER PROPOSAL Call Sign KA264 Licensee Code INTELS Licensee Name Intelsat License LLC Site Information HAGERSTOWN, MARYLAND Venue Name Latitude (NAD 83) 39° 35' 54.8" N Longitude (NAD 83) 77° 45' 21.1" W Climate Zone A Rain Zone 2 Ground Elevation (AMSL) 167.64 m / 550.0 ft Link Information Satellite Type Geostationary Mode TR - Transmit-Receive Modulation Analog and Digital Satellite Arc 18° W to 42° West Longitude Azimuth Range 110.4° to 131.5° Corresponding Elevation Angles 14.4° / 31.3° Antenna Centerline (AGL) 5.18 m / 17.0 ft Antenna Information Receive - V40901 Transmit - V60901 Manufacturer VERTEX COMM. VERTEX COMM. Model 9 KPC 9 KPC Gain / Diameter 50.1 dBi / 9.0 m 53.5 dBi / 9.0 m 3-dB / 15-dB Beamwidth 0.55° / 1.20° 0.40° / 0.80° Max Available RF Power (dBW/4 kHz) SEE ATTACHMENT 1 (dBW/MHz) SEE ATTACHMENT 1 Maximum EIRP (dBW/4 kHz) SEE ATTACHMENT 1 (dBW/MHz) SEE ATTACHMENT 1 (dBW) SEE ATTACHMENT 1 Interference Objectives: Long Term -156.0 dBW/MHz 20% -154.0 dBW/4 kHz 20% Short Term -144.0 dBW/MHz 0.01% -131.0 dBW/4 kHz 0.0025% Frequency Information Receive 4.0 GHz Transmit 6.1 GHz Emission / Frequency Range (MHz) N0N / 3625.0 - 4200.0 N0N / 5850.0 - 6425.0 660KF2D / 3625.0 - 4200.0 660KF2D / 5850.0 - 6425.0 1M00F2D / 3625.0 - 4200.0 1M00F2D / 5850.0 - 6425.0 56K0G7W - 72M0G7W / 3625.0 - 4200.0 56K0G7W - 72M0G7W / 5850.0 - 6425.0 Max Great Circle Coordination Distance 302.9 km / 188.2 mi 191.9 km / 119.2 mi Precipitation Scatter Contour Radius 518.5 km / 322.2 mi 100.0 km / 62.1 mi Interference Analysis Report for Hagerstown, Maryland

ATTACHMENT 1 Page 1 of 1 Vertex Communications: Model: 9 Meter KPC 4 GHz Gain: 50.1 dBi 6 GHz Gain: 53.5 dBi Satellite Arc: 18.0 to 42.0 West Longitude Receive Band: 3625.0 to 4200.0 MHz Emissions N0N 660KF2D 1M00F2D 56KG7W – 72M0G7W ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Satellite Arc: 18.0 to 42.0 West Longitude Transmit Band: 5850.0 – 6425.0 MHz RF Power Density EIRP/Carrier EIRP Density Emission (dBW/4 kHz) (dBW) (dBW/ 4 kHz) N0N -2.7 50.8 50.8 660KF2D -2.7 73.0 50.8 1M00F2D -2.7 74.8 50.8 56K0G7W to -2.7 to 62.3 to 50.8 to 72M0G7W -14.1 82.0 39.4 Interference Analysis Report for Hagerstown, Maryland

Coordination Values HAGERSTOWN, MD Licensee Name Intelsat License LLC Latitude (NAD 83) 39° 35' 54.8" N Longitude (NAD 83) 77° 45' 21.1" W Ground Elevation (AMSL) 167.64 m / 550.0 ft Antenna Centerline (AGL) 5.18 m / 17.0 ft Antenna Model VERTEX COMMUNICATIONS 9 KPC Antenna Mode Receive 4.0 GHz Transmit 6.1 GHz Interference Objectives: Long Term -156.0 dBW/MHz 20% -154.0 dBW/4 kHz 20% Short Term -144.0 dBW/MHz 0.01% -131.0 dBW/4 kHz 0.0025% Max Available RF Power -2.7 (dBW/4 kHz) Receive 4.0 GHz Transmit 6.1 GHz Horizon Antenna Horizon Coordination Horizon Coordination Azimuth (°) Elevation (°) Discrimination (°) Gain (dBi) Distance (km) Gain (dBi) Distance (km) 0 0.32 109.75 -15.90 226.95 -15.50 137.78 5 0.25 104.91 -15.90 233.94 -15.50 143.72 10 0.23 100.07 -15.90 236.63 -15.50 146.05 15 0.26 95.23 -15.90 233.45 -15.50 143.30 20 0.25 90.38 -15.90 233.83 -15.50 143.63 25 0.24 85.53 -15.90 235.39 -15.50 144.98 30 0.00 80.69 -16.00 239.39 -15.53 148.81 35 0.23 75.84 -18.55 224.33 -16.38 143.56 40 0.31 71.00 -18.90 214.07 -16.50 135.45 45 0.00 66.21 -15.87 240.07 -16.50 145.65 50 0.00 61.41 -14.90 245.08 -16.50 145.65 55 0.00 56.62 -14.22 248.66 -16.50 145.65 60 0.00 51.87 -13.27 253.97 -16.50 145.65 65 0.00 47.14 -12.33 259.25 -16.50 145.65 70 0.00 42.47 -11.39 264.62 -14.47 152.41 75 0.00 37.85 -9.61 275.23 -11.64 162.68 80 0.00 33.34 -7.23 290.19 -10.17 170.01 85 0.00 28.96 -5.90 298.99 -8.87 175.03 90 0.00 24.79 -5.90 298.99 -6.42 184.54 95 0.00 20.97 -5.90 298.99 -4.89 190.43 100 0.00 17.70 -5.90 298.99 -4.63 191.41 105 0.00 15.37 -5.90 298.99 -4.62 191.47 110 0.00 14.42 -5.32 302.91 -4.67 191.25 115 0.00 15.12 -5.90 298.99 -4.66 191.30 120 0.00 17.27 -5.90 298.99 -4.51 191.88 125 0.00 20.41 -5.90 298.99 -4.67 191.28 130 0.00 23.83 -5.90 298.99 -6.03 186.02 135 0.00 27.11 -5.90 298.99 -7.77 179.33 140 0.00 30.23 -5.99 298.38 -9.55 172.43 145 0.00 33.14 -7.16 290.70 -10.13 170.16 150 0.00 35.82 -8.39 282.82 -10.83 165.81 155 0.00 38.38 -9.93 273.31 -11.85 161.88 160 0.00 41.30 -11.16 265.98 -13.54 155.68 165 0.00 44.53 -11.81 262.23 -16.13 146.86 170 0.00 48.01 -12.50 258.27 -16.50 145.65 175 0.00 51.67 -13.23 254.18 -16.50 145.65 180 0.00 55.49 -14.00 250.01 -16.50 145.65 185 0.00 59.43 -14.79 245.68 -16.50 145.65 Interference Analysis Report for Hagerstown, Maryland

Coordination Values HAGERSTOWN, MD Licensee Name Intelsat License LLC Latitude (NAD 83) 39° 35' 54.8" N Longitude (NAD 83) 77° 45' 21.1" W Ground Elevation (AMSL) 167.64 m / 550.0 ft Antenna Centerline (AGL) 5.18 m / 17.0 ft Antenna Model VERTEX COMMUNICATIONS 9 KPC Antenna Mode Receive 4.0 GHz Transmit 6.1 GHz Interference Objectives: Long Term -156.0 dBW/MHz 20% -154.0 dBW/4 kHz 20% Short Term -144.0 dBW/MHz 0.01% -131.0 dBW/4 kHz 0.0025% Max Available RF Power -2.7 (dBW/4 kHz) Receive 4.0 GHz Transmit 6.1 GHz Horizon Antenna Horizon Coordination Horizon Coordination Azimuth (°) Elevation (°) Discrimination (°) Gain (dBi) Distance (km) Gain (dBi) Distance (km) 190 0.00 63.46 -14.90 245.08 -16.50 145.65 195 0.00 67.57 -16.95 234.66 -16.50 145.65 200 0.00 71.73 -18.90 225.46 -16.50 145.65 205 0.00 75.94 -18.90 225.46 -16.50 145.65 210 0.00 80.17 -16.32 237.82 -15.64 148.46 215 0.30 84.41 -15.90 228.84 -15.50 139.37 220 0.31 88.70 -15.90 227.66 -15.50 138.38 225 0.54 92.99 -15.90 207.53 -15.50 122.50 230 0.39 97.27 -15.90 219.88 -15.50 133.18 235 0.31 101.53 -15.90 228.24 -15.50 138.86 240 0.36 105.78 -15.90 222.71 -15.50 134.25 245 0.51 110.02 -15.92 209.05 -15.50 123.92 250 0.42 114.16 -19.23 205.74 -16.33 128.81 255 0.52 118.30 -19.90 194.28 -16.50 120.53 260 0.56 122.34 -19.90 192.10 -16.50 118.63 265 0.52 126.25 -19.90 194.28 -16.50 120.54 270 0.49 130.03 -19.90 196.15 -16.50 122.17 275 0.42 133.62 -19.90 202.43 -16.50 127.79 280 0.40 137.02 -19.90 204.37 -16.50 129.55 285 0.26 140.07 -19.90 214.68 -16.50 139.84 290 0.21 142.83 -19.90 220.27 -16.50 145.00 295 0.22 145.21 -19.90 219.35 -16.50 144.14 300 0.22 147.08 -19.90 218.89 -16.50 143.71 305 0.34 148.44 -19.90 207.75 -16.50 133.55 310 0.38 149.07 -19.90 206.14 -16.50 131.18 315 0.30 148.85 -19.90 211.02 -16.50 136.50 320 0.22 147.44 -19.90 219.34 -16.50 144.14 325 0.00 142.86 -19.90 220.97 -16.50 145.65 330 0.24 138.33 -19.90 216.84 -16.50 141.82 335 0.36 133.68 -19.90 205.56 -16.50 132.82 340 0.35 128.94 -19.90 206.26 -16.50 133.46 345 0.32 124.17 -19.90 209.36 -16.50 135.00 350 0.26 119.37 -19.90 214.95 -16.50 140.09 355 0.35 114.58 -19.56 207.40 -16.42 133.49 Interference Analysis Report for Hagerstown, Maryland

4.0 Interference Calculations The interference was calculated into the earth station receive system for both in-band and out-of-band interference. The interference power level was calculated using the formula below: Pr = Pt + Gt – FSL – OHLOSS + Ges – LLt - LLes Where: Pr : Interference power level received at victim earth station, in dBW Pt: Transmitter power of Radiolocation system, in dBW Gt: Gain of Radiolocation transmit system, in dBi FSL: Free Space Loss between radiolocation system and earth station, in dB OHLOSS: Over-the-Horizon losses between radiolocation system and earth station, in dB Ges: Horizon gain of the earth station toward radiolocation transmitter, in dBi LLt: Line losses of the radiolocation system, in dB (assume 2dB per NTIA report) LLes: Line losses of the earth station system, in dB (assume 0 dB unless known) This interference power level was then compared to in-band and out-of-band interference criteria. The in-band criteria was developed using ITU and FCC recommendations3. The out-of-band interference criteria was developed using the following: The earth station’s low –noise amplifier front-end overload criteria of was determined using the following calculations: T=C–G Where: T = input threshold at which front-end overload occurs, dBW C = output 1 dB gain compression point of the LNA, typical -20 dBW G = Gain of the LNA, dB For the purposes of this report it was assumed that the low-noise amplifier would not provide any out-of-band frequency rejection, thus no Frequency Dependent Rejection values based upon any RF selectivity, such as pre-LNA filtering or inherent LNA filtering, have been assumed. The maximum level of interference includes the input saturation threshold value minus a 10 dB output backoff value to consider in operation levels The maximum interference power receive, Pr, allowable then becomes: Max Pr > T - IPBO For a 65 dB gain LNA this value is -95 dBW. In the absence of manufacturer LNA/LNB specifications the following typical values have been used: T = -95 dBW C = -20 dBW G = 65 dB The propagation model to determine the over-the-horizon loss is the NSMA OH-Loss model4. When the propagation link is very lengthy, over 250 miles, an estimated OH-loss using a rounded earth modeling value has been used. 3 FCC Rules 47CFR25.251 by reference ITU Radio Regulations Appendix S7. 4 National Spectrum Managers Association has developed an industry accepted version which incorporates NBS Tech Note 101. Interference Analysis Report for Hagerstown, Maryland

5.0 Summary of Results The summary calculations are shown for all shipboard based and land based systems in Tables 4 through 8 below. Whenever Radar A and B are possibly in use, the interference calculations have assumed the higher powered systems (Radar B). The antenna elevation for the Ground Based systems was assumed to be 46 m even though it was not specified in the NTIA report. Interference Analysis Report for Hagerstown, Maryland

Table 4 Shipboard Radar A Land-Based Test and Training Sites Profile (Is path Total Interfering under Estimated Profiled Path Power Out-of Bearing Distance 250 FSL OH-Loss OH-Loss Loss Level In-Band Band Radar Location Lat (N) Lon (w) (deg.) (mi) miles?) (dB) (dB) (dB) (dB) (dBW/MHz) Interference? Overload? Pensacola, FL 302128 0871626 223.0 835.1 NO -166.3 -82.6 N/A -248.8 -204.7 NO NO Pascagoula, MS 302200 0882900 226.8 880.6 NO -166.7 -83.5 N/A -250.2 -206.1 NO NO St.Inigoes, MD 381000 0762300 142.7 123.4 YES -149.6 -58.8 -58.8 -208.4 -154.4 YES NO Table 5 Shipboard Radar B Land-Based Test and Training Sites Profile (Is path Total Interfering under Estimated Profiled Path Power Out-of Bearing Distance 250 FSL OH-Loss OH-Loss Loss Level In-Band Band Radar Location Lat (N) Lon (w) (deg.) (mi) miles?) (dB) (dB) (dB) (dB) (dBW/MHz) Interference? Overload? Moorestown, NJ 395849 0745630 79.1 152.1 YES -151.5 -67.8 -67.8 -219.3 -150.5 YES NO Wallops Island, VA 375600 0752800 132.2 168.8 YES -152.4 -66.7 -66.7 -219.1 -148.9 YES NO Table 6 Shipboard Radars A and B Home Ports Profile (Is path Total Interfering under Estimated Profiled Path Power Out-of Bearing Distance 250 FSL OH-Loss OH-Loss Loss Level In-Band Band Radar Location Lat (N) Lon (w) (deg.) (mi) miles?) (dB) (dB) (dB) (dB) (dBW/MHz) Interference? Overload? Bath, ME 435425 0694848 51.4 506.9 NO -161.9 -73.9 N/A -235.8 -174.7 NO NO Bremerton, WA 473324 1223811 299.2 2318.6 NO -175.1 -100.3 N/A -275.4 -219.3 NO NO Everett, WA 475858 1221354 300.0 2298.5 NO -175.0 -100.2 N/A -275.2 -219.1 NO NO Mayport, FL 302334 0812427 199.1 667.5 NO -164.3 -78.7 N/A -243.0 -185.9 NO NO Norfolk, VA 365200 0762100 157.5 203.4 YES -154.0 -67.4 -67.4 -221.4 -156.5 NO NO Pascagoula, MS 302253 0882933 226.9 880.2 NO -166.7 -83.5 N/A -250.2 -190.1 NO NO Pearl Harbor, HI 212000 1580000 275.6 4950.9 NO -181.7 -113.5 N/A -295.2 -239.1 NO NO Portland, ME 434100 0701800 51.4 478.0 NO -161.4 -72.9 N/A -234.3 -173.2 NO NO San Diego CA 324105 1170800 269.4 2253.2 NO -174.9 -99.8 -73.3 -274.7 -218.6 NO NO Interference Analysis Report for Hagerstown, Maryland

Table 7 Naval At-Sea Operational Areas Profile (Is path Total Interfering under Estimated Profiled Path Power Out-of Bearing Distance 250 FSL OH-Loss OH-Loss Loss Level In-Band Band Operational Area Lat (N) Lon (w) (deg.) (mi) miles?) (dB) (dB) (dB) (dB) (dBW/MHz) Interference? Overload? AFWTF (North Range) AFWTF (NR)1 183000 0670000 153.3 1592.2 NO -171.9 -93.8 N/A -265.6 -198.0 NO NO AFWTF (NR)2 200000 0670000 151.7 1496.5 NO -171.3 -92.7 N/A -264.0 -196.4 NO NO AFWTF (NR)3 221000 0654800 146.3 1395.2 NO -170.7 -91.5 N/A -262.2 -194.6 NO NO AFWTF (NR)4 221000 0652000 145.2 1409.5 NO -170.8 -91.7 N/A -262.5 -194.8 NO NO AFWTF (NR)5 185000 0620000 142.5 1718.0 NO -172.5 -95.1 N/A -267.6 -197.6 NO NO AFWTF (NR)6 185000 0620000 142.5 1718.0 NO -172.5 -95.1 N/A -267.6 -197.6 NO NO AFWTF (NR)7 182500 0643000 148.0 1664.9 NO -172.2 -94.6 N/A -266.8 -199.2 NO NO AFWTF (NR)8 183000 0644500 148.4 1652.5 NO -172.2 -94.4 N/A -266.6 -199.0 NO NO AFWTF (NR)9 183000 0663800 152.4 1601.4 NO -171.9 -93.9 N/A -265.8 -198.2 NO NO AFWTF (South Range) AFWTF (SR)1 180500 0675500 155.7 1597.3 NO -171.9 -93.8 N/A -265.7 -200.9 NO NO AFWTF (SR)2 180500 0652700 150.3 1659.0 NO -172.2 -94.5 N/A -266.7 -199.1 NO NO AFWTF (SR)3 181500 0651000 149.5 1656.3 NO -172.2 -94.5 N/A -266.7 -199.0 NO NO AFWTF (SR)4 181500 0641000 147.5 1685.1 NO -172.4 -94.8 N/A -267.1 -199.5 NO NO AFWTF (SR)5 170000 0641000 148.8 1762.8 NO -172.7 -95.5 N/A -268.3 -200.7 NO NO AFWTF (SR)6 165800 0642800 149.4 1756.4 NO -172.7 -95.5 N/A -268.2 -200.6 NO NO AFWTF (SR)7 153300 0660600 153.9 1803.7 NO -172.9 -95.9 N/A -268.9 -201.3 NO NO AFWTF (SR)8 153900 0662300 154.4 1790.4 NO -172.9 -95.8 N/A -268.7 -201.1 NO NO AFWTF (SR)9 163000 0662300 153.7 1735.6 NO -172.6 -95.3 N/A -267.9 -200.3 NO NO AFWTF (SR)10 163000 0675500 157.0 1700.3 NO -172.4 -94.9 N/A -267.3 -202.5 NO NO Interference Analysis Report for Hagerstown, Maryland

Table 7 Naval At-Sea Operational Areas (continued) Profile (Is path Profiled Total Interfering under Estimated OH- Path Power Out-of Bearing Distance 250 FSL OH-Loss Loss Loss Level In-Band Band Operational Area Lat (N) Lon (w) (deg.) (mi) miles?) (dB) (dB) (dB) (dB) (dBW/MHz) Interference? Overload? AUTEC AUTEC1 252000 0780500 181.2 983.1 NO -167.7 -85.4 N/A -253.1 -191.1 NO NO AUTEC2 252000 0774500 180.0 982.9 NO -167.7 -85.4 N/A -253.1 -191.0 NO NO AUTEC3 232500 0762000 175.3 1118.0 NO -168.8 -87.6 N/A -256.4 -194.4 NO NO AUTEC4 232500 0771500 178.3 1115.2 NO -168.8 -87.6 N/A -256.4 -194.3 NO NO FORACS, Hawaii FORACS, Hawaii1 212530 1581100 275.8 4957.7 NO -181.7 -113.5 N/A -295.2 -239.1 NO NO FORACS, Hawaii2 212100 1581500 275.7 4964.7 NO -181.7 -113.5 N/A -295.3 -239.1 NO NO FORACS, Hawaii3 211500 1580800 275.6 4962.1 NO -181.7 -113.5 N/A -295.3 -239.1 NO NO FORACS, Hawaii4 211500 1580700 275.6 4961.1 NO -181.7 -113.5 N/A -295.3 -239.1 NO NO Gulf of Mexico OPAREA GoM1 293601 0800130 191.3 701.2 NO -164.7 -79.5 N/A -244.3 -183.1 NO NO GoM2 292521 0864800 218.9 870.8 NO -166.6 -83.3 N/A -249.9 -189.8 NO NO GoM3 284101 0864800 217.1 913.6 NO -167.0 -84.1 N/A -251.2 -191.0 NO NO GoM4 285231 0874400 220.5 934.1 NO -167.2 -84.5 N/A -251.7 -191.6 NO NO Pacific Missile Range Facility (PMRF) PMRF1 220000 1594500 277.0 5024.5 NO -181.8 -113.7 N/A -295.6 -239.5 NO NO PMRF2 220800 1620000 278.1 5149.0 NO -182.1 -114.2 N/A -296.2 -240.1 NO NO PMRF3 224500 1614000 278.6 5104.3 NO -182.0 -114.0 N/A -296.0 -239.9 NO NO PMRF4 260000 1581500 280.5 4777.7 NO -181.4 -112.9 N/A -294.3 -238.1 NO NO Pearl Harbor South OPAREA PHS1 190800 1591500 274.0 5114.8 NO -182.0 -114.1 N/A -296.0 -239.9 NO NO PHS2 210000 1580800 275.3 4972.4 NO -181.8 -113.6 N/A -295.3 -239.2 NO NO PHS3 210000 1573600 275.1 4941.6 NO -181.7 -113.5 N/A -295.1 -239.0 NO NO PHS4 191800 1562000 272.9 4938.9 NO -181.7 -113.4 N/A -295.1 -239.0 NO NO PHS5 184900 1574500 273.0 5041.1 NO -181.9 -113.8 N/A -295.7 -239.5 NO NO Interference Analysis Report for Hagerstown, Maryland

Table 7 Naval At-Sea Operational Areas (continued) Profile (Is path Total Interfering under Estimated Profiled Path Power Out-of Bearing Distance 250 FSL OH-Loss OH-Loss Loss Level In-Band Band Operational Area Lat (N) Lon (w) (deg.) (mi) miles?) (dB) (dB) (dB) (dB) (dBW/MHz) Interference? Overload? Southern California (SOCAL) SOCAL1 385200 1255200 284.1 2581.7 NO -176.1 -102.2 N/A -278.2 -222.1 NO NO SOCAL2 390000 1240000 283.7 2479.1 NO -175.7 -101.5 N/A -277.2 -221.1 NO NO SOCAL3 311500 1163000 266.5 2260.8 NO -174.9 -99.9 -72.8 -274.8 -218.7 NO NO SOCAL4 300000 1203000 267.0 2519.0 NO -175.8 -101.7 N/A -277.6 -221.5 NO NO Virginia Capes OPAREA VC1 384500 0750000 110.7 159.1 YES -151.9 -68.0 -68 -219.9 -149.2 YES NO VC2 384500 0743000 107.5 184.4 YES -153.1 -71.7 -71.7 -224.8 -154.1 YES NO VC3 374500 0724000 113.3 303.3 NO -157.5 -85.4 -85.4 -242.9 -172.2 NO NO VC4 350600 0724000 136.4 418.0 NO -160.2 -70.5 N/A -230.8 -160.8 NO NO VC5 320000 0771200 176.4 524.8 NO -162.2 -74.5 N/A -236.7 -174.7 NO NO VC6 342400 0773000 177.7 358.8 NO -158.9 -67.9 N/A -226.8 -164.8 NO NO VC7 354000 0752500 154.0 300.0 NO -157.4 -79.6 -79.6 -237.0 -169.3 NO NO VC8 370000 0755000 149.2 207.5 YES -154.2 -70.8 -70.8 -225.0 -157.3 NO NO Interference Analysis Report for Hagerstown, Maryland

Table 8 Land-Based Radar Test and Training Sites Profile (Is path Total Interfering under Estimated Profiled Path Power Out-of Bearing Distance 250 FSL OH-Loss OH-Loss Loss Level In-Band Band Radar Location Lat (N) Lon (w) (deg.) (mi) miles?) (dB) (dB) (dB) (dB) (dBW/MHz) Interference? Overload? Fort Lewis WA 470525 1223510 298.3 2317.2 NO -175.1 -100.3 N/A -275.4 -219.3 NO NO Yakima Firing WA 464018 1202135 297.3 2208.6 NO -174.7 -99.5 N/A -274.2 -218.0 NO NO Fort Carson CO 383810 1044750 275.9 1454.7 NO -171.1 -92.2 N/A -263.3 -207.2 NO NO Fort Rliey KS 385813 0965139 273.6 1025.2 NO -168.0 -86.1 N/A -254.2 -198.0 NO NO Fort Shafter HI 211800 1574900 275.5 4941.7 NO -181.7 -113.5 N/A -295.1 -239.0 NO NO Hunter AAF GA 320100 0810800 200.9 556.1 NO -162.7 -75.5 N/A -238.2 -181.1 NO NO Fort Gillem GA 333600 0841900 223.4 551.5 NO -162.6 -75.4 N/A -238.0 -177.9 NO NO Fort Benning GA 322130 0845815 221.1 642.4 NO -164.0 -78.0 N/A -242.0 -181.9 NO NO Fort Stewart GA 315145 0813655 203.3 575.8 NO -163.0 -76.1 N/A -239.1 -182.0 NO NO Fort Rucker AL 311947 0854255 220.5 725.6 NO -165.0 -80.1 N/A -245.2 -185.0 NO NO Yuma Proving AZ 330114 1141855 268.3 2090.1 NO -174.2 -98.5 -72.8 -272.7 -216.6 NO NO Fort Hood TX 310830 0974550 248.5 1271.4 NO -169.9 -89.9 N/A -259.8 -203.0 NO NO Fort Knox KY 375350 0855655 257.7 457.9 NO -161.0 -98.3 -98.3 -259.3 -203.2 NO NO Fort Bragg NC 350805 0790035 193.0 315.5 NO -157.8 -81.3 -81.3 -239.1 -178.0 NO NO Fort Campbell KY 363950 0872820 252.1 566.7 NO -162.9 -108.6 N/A -271.5 -214.7 NO NO Fort Polk LA 310343 0931226 240.5 1052.8 NO -168.3 -86.6 N/A -254.9 -194.7 NO NO Fort Leonard MO 374430 0920737 265.1 787.6 NO -165.7 -81.6 N/A -247.3 -191.2 NO NO Fort Irwin CA 351536 1164102 273.9 2161.8 NO -174.5 -99.1 -68.1 -273.6 -217.5 NO NO Fort Sill OK 344024 0982352 259.6 1189.2 NO -169.3 -88.7 N/A -258.0 -201.9 NO NO Fort Bliss TX 314850 1062533 260.0 1699.2 NO -172.4 -94.9 N/A -267.3 -226.2 NO NO Fort Leavenworth KS 392115 0945500 274.4 917.7 NO -167.1 -84.2 N/A -251.3 -195.2 NO NO Fort Drum NY 440115 0754844 17.6 321.3 NO -158.0 -66.0 N/A -223.9 -163.8 NO NO Fort Gordon GA 332510 0820910 211.2 491.4 NO -161.6 -73.4 N/A -235.0 -175.3 NO NO Fort McCoy WI 440636 0904127 299.3 736.5 NO -165.2 -80.4 N/A -245.5 -189.4 NO NO Fort Dix NJ 400025 0743713 79.4 169.2 YES -152.4 -69.4 -69.4 -221.8 -153.0 YES NO Parks Reserve CA 374254 1214218 280.6 2380.6 NO -175.4 -100.8 N/A -276.1 -220.0 NO NO Aberdeen Proving MD 392825 0760655 95.1 88.1 YES -146.7 -62.2 -62.2 -208.9 -138.8 YES NO Fort Huachuca AZ 313500 1102000 262.7 1916.0 NO -173.5 -97.0 N/A -270.5 -229.3 NO NO Fort Monmouth NJ 401900 0740215 74.7 203.5 YES -154.0 -73.4 -73.4 -227.4 -162.8 NO NO Picatinny Arsenal NJ 405600 0743400 60.3 192.1 YES -153.5 -74.5 -74.5 -228.0 -165.2 NO NO Interference Analysis Report for Hagerstown, Maryland

Table 8 Land-Based Radar Test and Training Sites (continued) Profile (Is path Total Interfering under Estimated Profiled Path Power Out-of Bearing Distance 250 FSL OH-Loss OH-Loss Loss Level In-Band Band Radar Location Lat (N) Lon (w) (deg.) (mi) miles?) (dB) (dB) (dB) (dB) (dBW/MHz) Interference? Overload? Redstone Arsenal AL 343630 0863610 237.5 597.7 NO -163.3 -76.8 N/A -240.1 -180.0 NO NO White Sands NM 322246 1062813 261.2 1684.2 NO -172.3 -94.8 N/A -267.1 -226.0 NO NO Army Research MD 390000 0765800 134.1 59.1 YES -143.3 -60.5 -60.5 -203.8 -133.6 YES NO Fort Hunter CA 355756 1211404 277.3 2393.1 NO -175.4 -100.9 N/A -276.3 -235.1 NO NO Kelly Support PA 402357 0800925 294.2 138.9 YES -150.7 -60.8 -60.8 -211.5 -155.4 YES NO Table Headings Radar Location : The site name of the radar system Lat (N) : Radar latitude Lon (w) : Radar Longitude Bearing (deg.) : Azimuth from earth station toward radar. Distance (mi) : Distance from earth station to radar Profile (Is path under 250 miles?) : If path is over 250 miles no OH-loss profile is generated FSL (dB) : Free Space Loss Estimated OH-Loss (dB) : Using a rounded-earth model an estimated OH-loss is calculated for long paths Profiled OH-Loss (dB) : Using the NSMA Tropo Loss actual OH-loss calculcations are performed for shorter paths Total Path Loss (dB) : Total of Free Space Loss plus Over-the-Horizon loss Interfering Power Level (dBW/MHz) : Level of RF interference at the earth station's LNA input In-Band Interference? : If the Radar is operating in-band is the max. permissible interference criteria being met? Out-of Band Overload? : If the Radar is operating in out-of-band spectrum is the LNA overload threshold being met? Interference Analysis Report for Hagerstown, Maryland

6.0 Conclusions Calculations were performed to assess the electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) between the radars listed below and adjacent-band FSS earth station receiver at Hagerstown, Maryland. Interference assessment for Earth Stations Operating at 3625 - 3700 MHz at the Hagerstown, MD site identified 9 cases of In-band potential interference. The applicant is aware of this potential for interference and will work with the Government Users to mitigate the problem. Results Total Number of Paths Lat (N) Lon (W) Out-of-Band In-Band 9 sites Overload? Interference? St.Inigoes, MD 381000 0762300 No Yes Moorestown, NJ 395849 0745630 No Yes Wallops Island, VA 375600 0752800 No Yes VC 1 OPEREA 384500 0750000 No Yes VC 2 OPEREA 384500 0743000 No Yes Fort Dix NJ 400025 0743713 No Yes Aberdeen Proving MD 392825 0760655 No Yes Army Research MD 390000 0765800 No Yes Kelly Support PA 402357 0800925 No Yes Interference Analysis Report for Hagerstown, Maryland


Document Created: 2013-01-15 10:17:49
Document Modified: 2013-01-15 10:17:49
© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC