Boeing Iridium uplin

LETTER submitted by The Boeing Company

Uplink coordination analysis

2012-07-09

This document pretains to SES-MOD-20120403-00326 for Modification on a Satellite Earth Station filing.

IBFS_SESMOD2012040300326_958919

              Analysis of Potential Interference to the Iridium Feeder Links
               in the 29.25 – 29.3 GHz band from Boeing Satellite uplinks

1. Background
The frequencies of the Boeing system (call sign E100106) and the Iridium system overlap in the
frequency band 29.25 – 29.3 GHz. Iridium’s gateway earth station in Tempe, Arizona operates earth-to-
space feeder links and TT&C links in this band which are co-primary with Boeing’s ongoing operations.
As the Iridium satellites orbit the earth at an altitude of 775 km, they will at times transit the uplink beam of
the Boeing earth station directed towards a geostationary satellite.
For simplicity and consistency, some of the data used for this analysis was obtained from a similar
DirecTV filing (SES−MFS−20111104−01315, November 4, 2011).


2. Analysis
The Boeing and Iridium earth stations are located are as follows:


                                                       City                          Latitude, Longitude
 Boeing                                             Kent, WA                         47.42° N, 122.25° W
 Iridium                                           Tempe, AZ                         33.34° N, 111.90° W


The Kent and Tempe earth stations are separated by 1,793 km. This contrasts sharply with the previously
mentioned DirecTV analysis in which the earth stations were separated by only 168 km.
The Kent earth station can see the GSO orbital arc from about 160° E to about 45°W. The line-of-sight
(LOS) from Kent to these GSO slots would intersect the 775 km Iridium orbital altitude at the
latitude/longitude locations shown in the following figure, assuming a minimum elevation angle for
visibility from Tempe of 5°.




                                                       1


                     50
                                                           Kent-GSO intercepts with Iridium orbit
                     45
Latitude (degrees)




                     40


                     35                                                                                        Kent
                                                                                                               Ir orbit intercept points

                     30                                                                                        Tempe



                     25
                          -140            -130            -120          -110         -100       -90           -80
                                                                 Longitude (degrees)


                                                                                                                               (Not to scale)
                                                    Figure 1. Kent-GSO intercepts with Iridium orbit

Over this range of intercept points, the off-axis angle at the Iridium satellite ranges from 32.8° to 92.8°.
These relatively large values of off-axis angles occur because Kent and Tempe are far apart. For any off-
axis angle greater than 30°, the Iridium satellite antenna discrimination will be 40.1 dB, as shown in
Figure 2.
For example, the LOS from Kent to a GSO longitude of -161° would intersect the Iridium orbital sphere at
39.1, -133.1 latitude, longitude. For an Iridium satellite at this orbital position, with its antenna pointed at
Tempe, the ES at Kent will appear at an angle of 52.0° off the mainbeam axis of the Iridium satellite
antenna. From the antenna mask graph in Figure 2, this will yield an antenna discrimination of 40.1 dB.
For this location, the C0/I0 can be calculated as shown in Table 1, using information from the DirecTV
analysis and the current Boeing authorization. Boeing operates the transmitter in a laboratory
environment for preliminary design and demonstration projects. In addition, any transmission from Kent,
Washington will be subject to occasional rain fades. For these reasons, both a maximum and nominal
calculation are given in the table.


                                                                          Max signal                     Nominal Signal
                                                           Tempe signal          Kent signal   Tempe Signal         Kent Signal
                                 eirp (dBW)                      43.50                 73.9       43.50                59.3
                                 bandwidth (MHz)                  4.00                 29.0           4.00              4.4
                                 eirp density
                                 (dBW/Hz)                        -22.5                 -0.7           -22.5            -7.1
                                 Path loss (dB)                  -188.8              -185.6       -188.8              -185.6
                                 Ir satellite gain (dB)           30.1                 -10.0          30.1             -10.0
                                 power density
                                 received                        -181.2              -196.3       -181.2              -202.8
                                 C0/I0                            15.1                  --            21.5                --

                                                             Table 1. Example C0/I0 calculation


                                                                                 2


As can be seen, for this location, the C0/I0 is 15.1 and 21.5 dB for the max and nominal cases. These are
the minimum values for these two cases experienced over the range of orbital longitudes. Similar to the
DirecTV study, even this level would occur for only a very small fraction of the time as the Iridium satellite
quickly traverses the Kent earth station’s narrow antenna beam.
Over the range of orbital slots visible to Kent, the C0/I0 changes little because the relative geometries
change very little. The values are shown in the Table 2 for selected GSO orbital locations. As can be
seen, the proposed ALSAT designation is compatible with the Iridium system for all of the possible orbital
locations.


            GSO             Latitude,      Longitude,        Off-axis                     Co/Io,    Co/Io,
          Longitude         intercept       intercept       angle(deg)   Discrimination    max     nominal
            -173.0             38.7           -138.1           41.7          -10.0        15.2      21.6
            -169.0             38.8           -136.3           45.1          -10.0        15.2      21.6
            -165.0             39.0           -134.6           48.5          -10.0        15.1      21.5
            -161.0             39.1           -133.1           52.0          -10.0        15.1      21.5
            -157.0             39.1           -131.7           55.5          -10.0        15.1      21.5
            -153.0             39.2           -130.4           59.0          -10.0        15.2      21.6
            -149.0             39.3           -129.2           62.5          -10.0        15.3      21.7
            -145.0             39.3           -128.0           66.0          -10.0        15.4      21.8
            -141.0             39.4           -126.9           69.4          -10.0        15.6      22.0
            -137.0             39.4           -125.9           72.7          -10.0        15.8      22.2
            -133.0             39.4           -124.9           76.0          -10.0        16.0      22.4
            -129.0             39.4           -123.9           79.1          -10.0        16.3      22.7
            -125.0             39.4           -122.9           82.0          -10.0        16.6      23.0
            -121.0             39.4           -121.9           84.8          -10.0        17.0      23.4
            -117.0             39.4           -120.9           87.2          -10.0        17.4      23.8
            -113.0             39.4           -119.9           89.4          -10.0        17.8      24.2
            -109.0             39.4           -118.9           91.1          -10.0        18.3      24.7
            -105.0             39.4           -117.9           92.3          -10.0        18.9      25.3
            -101.0             39.3           -116.8           92.8          -10.0        19.4      25.8
            -97.0              39.3           -115.7           92.6          -10.0        20.0      26.4
            -93.0              39.2           -114.5           91.5          -10.0        20.6      27.0
            -89.0              39.2           -113.2           89.3          -10.0        21.2      27.6
            -85.0              39.1           -111.9           86.0          -10.0        21.7      28.1
            -81.0              39.0           -110.4           81.6          -10.0        22.2      28.6
            -77.0              38.9           -108.8           76.3          -10.0        22.5      28.9
            -73.0              38.8           -107.0           70.2          -10.0        22.6      29.0
            -69.0              38.6           -105.1           63.8          -10.0        22.6      29.0
            -65.0              38.5           -102.9           57.5          -10.0        22.5      28.9
            -61.0              38.3           -100.5           51.4          -10.0        22.2      28.6
            -57.0              38.1           -97.8            45.9          -10.0        21.9      28.3
            -53.0              37.8           -94.9            41.0          -10.0        21.5      27.9
            -49.0              37.5           -91.6            36.6          -10.0        21.1      27.5
            -45.0              37.2           -88.0            32.8          -10.0        20.7      27.1

                                   Table 2. C0/I0 for the visible GSO arc



                                                        3


Source: Figure 3A of the DirecTV analysis, (SES−MFS−20111104−01315, November 4, 2011)


Figure 2. Modified ITU-R Recommendation S.672-4 Iridium Spacecraft Antenna Pattern




                                             4



Document Created: 2012-07-09 12:22:53
Document Modified: 2012-07-09 12:22:53

© 2025 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC