CCSS E050143 License

LETTER submitted by Clear Channel Satellite Services

E050143 Letter

2010-08-09

This document pretains to SES-MOD-20091210-01567 for Modification on a Satellite Earth Station filing.

IBFS_SESMOD2009121001567_834175

                                                               Hogan Lovells US LLP
                                                               Columbia Square
                                                               555 Thirteenth Street, NW
                                                               Washington, DC 20004
                                                               T +1 202 637 5600
                                                               F +1 202 637 5910
                                                               www.hoganlovells.com




August 9, 2010

By Electronic Filing

Ms. Marlene H. Dortch
Secretary
Federal Communications Commission
445 12th Street, S.W.
Washington, D.C. 20554


Re:       File No. SES-MOD-20091210-01568, Call Sign E050143
          Request of Clear Channel Satellite Services for Correction of License

Dear Ms. Dortch:

Clear Channel Satellite Services (“Clear Channel”), by its attorneys, hereby requests that the
Commission issue a corrected license for call sign E050143. The current license has erroneous
information regarding the space stations with which E050143 is authorized to communicate.

The E050143 license is for a Ku-band VSAT network with the hub station in Englewood, Colorado,
and various remote terminal antenna sizes and models. Included on the authorization are some
antennas that do not comply with the antenna performance requirements of Section 25.209 of the
Commission’s rules, 47 C.F.R. § 25.209. Accordingly, when Clear Channel filed the initial
application for this license in 2005, the company submitted documentation demonstrating that use of
the non-compliant antennas had been coordinated for operations on the AMC-1 space station at
103° W.L. and on the AMC-4 space station at 101° W.L.1

However, although the initial application correctly identified the space stations and orbital locations
for use with the non-compliant antennas, the license granted in response to the application did not.
Specifically, instead of identifying AMC-1 at 103° W.L. as an authorized point of communications for
the non-compliant antenna models as requested, the license listed the AMSC-1 satellite at
103° W.L.2 This is clearly incorrect, as AMSC-1 is not a Ku-band satellite that could be used for




1
  See File No. SES-LIC-20050518-00622 (letter from Liz Karr, Office Manager of Clear Channel
Satellite Services, concerning coordination of the proposed remote terminal operations using SES
Americom’s AMC-1 satellite at 103° W.L. and AMC-4 satellite at 101° W.L. and affidavits of adjacent
satellite operators confirming coordination of those operations).
2
  See File No. SES-LIC-20050518-00622, license granted Aug. 30, 2005, at 2, Section D.


Ms. Marlene H. Dortch                            -2-                                    August 9, 2010



VSAT operations.3 The current license still includes this error, with AMSC-1 at 103° W.L. identified
as an authorized point of communications for two of Clear Channel’s sub-meter antenna models.4

For two other antenna models authorized to communicate with AMC-1, the satellite is correctly
identified, but the orbital location is listed as 101° W.L. instead of 103° W.L.5 Clear Channel believes
this error was introduced because at one time the drop-down menu in the earth station application
Form 312 Schedule B had the wrong orbital location listed for the AMC-1 space station.6 Again,
however, the documentation Clear Channel submitted in support of its applications correctly
identified both the space stations and orbital locations to be used.7

There is also an omission on the license with respect to the satellites with which Clear Channel’s
0.98 meter antennas are authorized to communicate. Specifically, the license specifies only AMC-1
as a point of communication for these antennas.8 The application to add these terminals to
E050143, however, requested authority for communications with both AMC-1 at 103° W.L. and
AMC-4 at 101° W.L.9

Finally, Clear Channel notes that the AMC-4 satellite has been replaced at 101° W.L. by the SES-1
spacecraft. Clear Channel’s operations at this orbital location continue on SES-1 rather than AMC-4
pursuant to the same technical characteristics. Clear Channel seeks an update of the license for call
sign E050143 to reflect that SES-1 rather than AMC-4 is now the authorized satellite at 101° W.L.




3
  Furthermore, AMSC-1 is licensed to operate at the nominal 101° W.L. orbital location, not at
103° W.L.
4
  See File No. SES-MOD-20091210-01567, license granted Feb. 17, 2010, at 4, Section D (points of
communication for remote terminals designated TT09612 .96M and TT0753 .75M).
5
  Id., (points of communication for remote terminals designated TT0.9816 and TT1016R).
6
  The AMC-1 space station has been assigned to 103° W.L. for the entire time Clear Channel has
been using the satellite, but the Schedule B drop down menu for a time identified the AMC-1 orbital
location as 101° W.L.
7
  See File Nos SES-MOD-20060420-00695 (letter from Liz Karr, Office Manager of Clear Channel
Satellite Services, concerning coordination of the proposed remote terminal operations using SES
Americom’s AMC-1 satellite at 103° W.L. and AMC-4 satellite at 101° W.L. and affidavits of adjacent
satellite operators confirming coordination of those operations); SES-MOD-20060710-01124 (same);
& SES-MOD-20071121-01608 (letter from SES Americom regarding coordination of proposed
remote terminal operations using AMC-1 at 103° W.L. and AMC-4 at 101° W.L.).
8
  See File No. SES-MOD-20091210-01567, license granted Feb. 17, 2010, at 4, Section D (points of
communication for remote terminals designated TT0.9816).
9
  See File No SES-MOD-20060420-00695 (letter from Liz Karr, Office Manager of Clear Channel
Satellite Services, concerning coordination of the proposed remote terminal operations using SES
Americom’s AMC-1 satellite at 103° W.L. and AMC-4 satellite at 101° W.L. and affidavits of adjacent
satellite operators confirming coordination of those operations).


Ms. Marlene H. Dortch                           -3-                                  August 9, 2010



Clear Channel respectfully requests that the Commission issue a corrected license for this call sign.
Attached is a table showing the required changes to Section D of the license. Please direct any
questions regarding this submission to the undersigned.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Karis A. Hastings

Karis A. Hastings

Counsel for Clear Channel Satellite Services
karis.hastings@hoganlovells.com
D +1.202.637.5767

Attachment
cc:    Kathyrn Medley
       Paul Blais


Required corrections to license for call sign E050143, Section D (insertions shown with double
underlining, and deletions shown with strikethrough):

D) Point of Communications:

The following stations located in the Satellite orbits consistent with Sections B and C of this Entry:

1) CCSS INV 6.1A to All authorized U.S. Domestic (ALSAT) Satellites.

2) TT09612 .96M to SES-1 AMC-4 @ 101 degrees W.L. (U.S.-licensed domestic satellite)

3) TT09612 .96M to AMC-1 AMSC-1 @ 103 degrees W.L. (U.S.-licensed domestic satellite)

4) TT0753 .75M to SES-1 AMC-4 @ 101 degrees W.L. (U.S.-licensed domestic satellite)

5) TT0753 .75M to AMC-1 AMSC-1 @ 103 degrees W.L. (U.S.-licensed domestic satellite)

6) TT0.9816 to AMC-1 @ 103 101 degrees W.L. (U.S.-licensed domestic satellite)

7) TT0.9816 to SES-1 @ 101 degrees W.L. (U.S.-licensed domestic satellite)

87) TT1016R to SES-1 AMC-4 @ 101 degrees W.L. (U.S.-licensed domestic satellite)

98) TT1016R to AMC-1 @ 103 101 degrees W.L. (U.S.-licensed domestic satellite)

109) TT1240DR to All authorized U.S. Domestic (ALSAT) Satellites.

1110) TT1250TV to All authorized U.S. Domestic (ALSAT) Satellites.

1211) TTRVN_9808 to All authorized U.S. Domestic (ALSAT) Satellites.



Document Created: 2010-08-09 10:51:45
Document Modified: 2010-08-09 10:51:45

© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC