Attachment Supplement

Supplement

LETTER submitted by Mobile Satellite Ventures Subsidiary LLC

Supplement information to add ATC

2005-11-17

This document pretains to SES-MOD-20051110-01561 for Modification on a Satellite Earth Station filing.

IBFS_SESMOD2005111001561_467295

  fls                                                            2300 N Street, N.W.             Tel   —202.663.8000
?‘%%%i}@@f                                                      Washington, D.C. 20037—1128     Fax   202.663.8007
W%fi??é%’%g}                                                                                     www.pilisburylaw.com
Shaw
Pittman.

      November 17, 2005                                                                       Bruce D. Jacobs
                                                                                                  202—663—8077
                                                                                bruce.jacobs@pillsburylaw.com




      Via Hand Delivery
      Ms. Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary
      Federal Communications Commission
      445 12th Street, S.W.
      Washington, D.C. 20554

              Re:    Mobile Satellite Ventures Subsidiary LLC
                     Application for Modification of License to Operate ATC
                     File No. SAT—MOD—20051104—00212
                     File No. SAT—MOD—20051104—00211
                     File No. SES—MOD—20051110—01561

      Dear Ms. Dortch:

             On November 15, 2005, Peter Karabinis, Senior Vice President and Chief
      Technical Officer of Mobile Satellite Ventures Subsidiary LLC ("MSV"); and Bruce
      Jacobs and David Konczal of Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, counsel for MSV;
      met with William Bell, Richard Engleman, Howard Griboff, Andrea Kelly, Karl
      Kensinger, Scott Kottler, Kathyrn Medley, Robert Nelson, and Sean O‘More of the
      International Bureau regarding MSV‘s above—referenced application for modification of
      its license to operate an Ancillary Terrestrial Component ("ATC"). In addition to
      discussing the document attached hereto, MSV elaborated on the public interest benefits
      of the waivers it is seeking, which are discussed on pages 9—11 of the Technical Appendix
      of the application. Among other things, the requested base station waivers will minimize
      the cost and complexity of deploying an ATC network, meaning ATC can be deployed
      more expeditiously and at less cost. The requested waiver pertaining to the EIRP of user
      devices will afford MSV additional flexibility that is important to offering new and
      innovative services.

              Please direct any questions regarding this matter to the undersigned.

                                            Very truly yours,


                                           f.. D %zm
                                            Bruce D. Jacobs


Ms. Marlene H. Dortch
November 17, 2005
Page 2



co:      William Bell
         Richard Engleman
         Howard Griboff
         Andrea Kelly
         Karl Kensinger
         Scott Kottler
         Kathyrn Medley
         Robert Nelson
         Sean O‘More


MSV‘s APPLICATION FOR MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO OPERATE
            AN ANCILLARY TERRESTRIAL COMPONENT

                               Fundamental Relationship

Let P ; and B; denote the EIRP (Watts) and the bandwidth (Hz) of a carrier, respectively,
of a first protocol (e.g., GSM). The EIRP spectral density (i.e., the equivalent isotropic
radiated power spectral density, "PSD") of the carrier may be expressed as:

     10*log (P1/B;) = 10*log (P;) — 10*log (B;); dBW/Hz                              (1)
Let P; and B; denote the EIRP (Watts) and the bandwidth (Hz) of a carrier, respectively,
of a second protocol (e.g., cdma2000). The EIRP spectral density associated with M
second carriers, each radiating the same EIRP, P;, can be expressed as:

     10*log [M*(Py/B;)] = 10*log (M) + 10*log (P;) — 10*log (B;); dBW/Hz         _    (2)

Equating equation (1) to equation (2) and solving for M; we find:

    p — 1 o[10tes (P1) — 10*log (P;) + 10*log (B,) — 10*log (B 4 )10                  3)

Application: Let us assume that 10*log (P;)= 0 dBW and 10*log (B;) = 53 dBHz as
may be the case for a GSM return link carrier (200 kHz bandwidth and EIRP = 1 Watt).
For a second protocol let us assume 10*log (P;) = —6 dBW (i.e., EIRP = 0.25 Watts) and a
carrier bandwidth of 1.25 MHz; that is, 10*log (B;) = 61 dBHz, as may be the case for a
return link cdma2000 carrier radiating one code. Substituting these values into equation
(3) above we find:

                      M = 100 +6+ 61— 53119 = 1 p[141/10 _ 95

This means that the PSD potential that may be generated by a fully—loaded return link
GSM carrier (all eight time slots loaded) is indistinguishable from the PSD potential that
may be generated by 25 cdma2000 return link carriers each radiating one code or by one
cdma2000 return link carrier radiating 25 codes (each at —6 dBW EIRP).



Document Created: 2005-11-29 12:38:19
Document Modified: 2005-11-29 12:38:19

© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC