Attachment Technical Annex SES-MFS-20180911-02588

Attachment Technical Annex

This document pretains to SES-MFS-20180911-02588 for Modification w/ Foreign Satellite (earth station) on a Satellite Earth Station filing.

IBFS_SESMFS2018091102588_1529001

Globecomm License Sub LLC

Technical Annex

A. Technical Information to Supplement Schedule S

B. Radiation Hazard Report for 9.3 Meter Earth Station

C. Frequency Coordination and Interference Analysis Report

D. FCC Letter to ANATEL

ATTACHMENT A

Technical Information to Supplement Schedule S

1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE

The purpose of this Attachment is to provide the Commission with the technical characteristics of
the EUTELSAT 65 WEST A (“E65WA”) satellite. This attachment contains information required
by the Commission that cannot be entered into the Schedule S submission.

2 GENERAL DESCRIPTION

Eutelsat do Brasil LTDA (“Eutelsat”) operates the E65WA satellite at the nominal 65° W.L.
location. The satellite is capable of providing a wide range of FSS services using the C-, Ku- and
Ka-bands. For purposes of this application, U.S. market access is being sought only for the Ku-
bands. Accordingly, only the characteristics of the Ku-band payload are described herein and in
the associated Schedule S form.

The Ku-bands used by the satellite are the Appendix 30B Ku-bands: 12.75-13.25 GHz uplink band
and the 10.75-10.95 GHz and 11.2-11.45 GHz downlink bands. The satellite employs twenty-four
36 MHz Ku-band transponders. There are two Ku-bands beams in both the uplink and downlink
directions: the “South American” beam, which includes coverage of eastern United States, and
the Brazil beam. Twelve transponders are switchable between the South American and Brazil
beams.

3 FREQUENCY AND POLARIZATION PLAN

The E65WA satellite’s Ku-band frequency and polarization plan, including beam connectivity
options, are provided in the associated Schedule S form. The satellite provides full frequency reuse
as required by Section 25.210(f) of the Commission’s rules.

1

4 SPACE STATION TRANSMIT AND RECEIVE CAPABILITIES

The transmit and receive antenna gain contours of the satellite’s Ku-band beams are provided in
GXT format and are embedded in the associated Schedule S form.

The maximum EIRP and EIRP densities for each of the downlink beams are listed in Table 1. Also
listed are the maximum and minimum saturating flux-density (“SFD”) levels, referenced at the
beam peak, for each of the uplink beams.

Table 1. Maximum Downlink EIRP and EIRP Densities. Maximum and Minimum SFD’s.

Maximum Maximum
Downlink Downlink Maximum SFD Minimum SFD
Beam
EIRP EIRP Density (dBW/m2) (dBW/m2)
(dBW) (dBW/Hz)
Brazil 51.9 -23.0 -70 -92
South America 50.4 -23.0 -70 -92

In addition, authorized uplink transmissions towards the E65WA satellite will not exceed an input
power density of -47 dBW/Hz. The E65WA satellite network will be operated in a manner
consistent with ITU coordination agreements reached by Brazil.

2

5 ARRANGEMENT FOR TT&C

TT&C will not be conducted from U.S. territory. The satellite control center and primary TT&C
site is located in Brazil. The backup TT&C site is located in Portugal. Information for the satellite
control center and TT&C stations is provided below:

Satellite Control Center and Primary TT&C Station:

Avenida Valville, 450 – Sítio Tanquinho – Santana do Parnaíba
SP CEP 06532-010, Brazil
24/7 contact phone numbers: +55 11 2110-3365 / +55 11 2110-3353 / +55 11 4196-5594

Backup TT&C Station Location:

Zona Franca Industrial da Madeira – Lote 27 B/C 9200-047 Caniçal, Madeira,
Portugal

6 POWER FLUX DENSITY ANALYSIS

The Commission’s Part 25 rules do not contain PFD limits applicable to the Appendix 30B 10.7-
10.95 GHz and 11.2-11.45 GHz bands. However it is noted that Article 21 of the ITU Radio
Regulations includes PFD limits that are applicable to GSO satellites using these bands. The ITU
limits are identical to those of Section 25.208(b) of the Commission’s rules.

Tables 1 and 2 show the PFD levels that will occur at various angles of arrival for the two downlink
beams when transmitting with a maximum downlink EIRP density of -23 dBW/Hz. These two
tables demonstrate compliance with the ITU’s Article 21 PFD limits.

3

Table 2. Maximum PFD Levels of Beam SADH

Applicable PFD Worst Case PFD
Limit for Angle of PFD Margin
Angle of Spreading Loss Gain Contour Level at Angle of
Arrival Arrival (dBW/m2) (dB) Arrival
(dBW/m2/4 kHz) (dB)
(dBW/m2/4 kHz)

0° -150.0 -163.4 -20 -170.4 20.4
5° -150.0 -163.3 -19 -169.3 19.3
10° -147.5 -163.2 -17 -167.1 19.6
15° -145.0 -163.0 -14.8 -164.8 19.8
20° -142.5 -162.9 -14.6 -164.5 22.0
25° -140.0 -162.8 -14.2 -164.0 24.0
72.4°
-140.0 -162.1 0.0 -149.1 9.1
(Peak)

Table 3. Maximum PFD Levels of Beams BDH and BDV

Applicable PFD Worst Case PFD
Limit for Angle of PFD Margin
Angle of Spreading Loss Gain Contour Level at Angle of
Arrival Arrival (dBW/m2) (dB) Arrival
(dBW/m2/4 kHz) (dB)
(dBW/m2/4 kHz)

0° -150.0 -163.4 -20 -170.4 20.4
5° -150.0 -163.3 -19 -166.1 19.3
10° -147.5 -163.2 -19 -165.3 21.6
15° -145.0 -163.0 -18 -164.2 23.0
20° -142.5 -162.9 -17 -163.1 24.4
25° -140.0 -162.8 -16 -160.0 25.8
66.4°
-140.0 -162.2 0.0 -149.2 9.2
(Peak)

7 TWO-DEGREE COMPATIBILITY ANALYSIS

This section demonstrates that the E65WA satellite network’s operations are two-degree
compatible.

Currently there are no operational Ku-band satellites two degrees away from the nominal 65° W.L.
location using the Appendix 30B bands, nor are there any pending applications before the
Commission requesting to use the Ku-bands at a location two degrees or less from the nominal 65°
W.L. location. In order to demonstrate two-degree compatibility, the transmission parameters of
the E65WA satellite network have been used as both the wanted and interfering transmissions.

4

Table 4 provides a summary of the typical transmission parameters used by the E65WA satellite
network and which were used in the interference analysis.

Table 5 shows the results of the interference calculations in terms of the overall C/I margins. The
interference calculations assume a 1 dB advantage for topocentric-to-geocentric conversion, all
wanted and interfering carriers are co-polarized and all earth station antennas conform to a sidelobe
pattern of 29-25 log(). The C/I calculations were performed on a per Hz basis.

It can be seen that all the C/I margins are positive, thereby demonstrating the two-degree
compatibility of the E65WA satellite network.

Table 4. Typical Transmission Parameters
Tx E/S Uplink Rx E/S
Emission Bandwidth Downlink EIRP C/I Criterion
Carrier ID Gain EIRP Gain
Designator (MHz) (dBW) (dB)
(dBi) (dBW) (dBi)
1 49K0G7W 0.0486 42.4 41.0 12.3 56.5 16.5
2 1M34G7W 1.34 53.9 59.7 30.8 47.2 16.5
3 6M33G7W 6.33 53.9 67.1 38.2 44.7 17.7
4 10M0G7W 10.0 57.3 70.1 40.9 44.7 16.5
5 36M0G7W 36.0 57.3 79.1 48.9 41.1 20.5

Table 5. Summary of the overall link C/I margins (dB).
Interfering Carriers
Carrier
1 2 3 4 5
ID
1 5.4 10.9 10.2 11.3 8.3
2 8.5 9.4 8.8 8.4 5.9
Carriers
Wanted

3 7.2 6.7 6.1 5.6 3.1
4 9.3 8.8 8.1 7.5 5.1
5 6.3 3.9 3.3 2.6 0.1

5

8 ORBITAL DEBRIS MITIGATION PLAN

8.1 Spacecraft Hardware Design

Eutelsat can confirm that the satellite will not undergo any planned release of debris during its
operation. Furthermore, all separation and deployment mechanisms, and any other potential
source of debris will be retained by the spacecraft.

In conjunction with Space Systems/Loral, Eutelsat has assessed and limited the probability of the
satellite becoming a source of debris by collisions with small debris or meteoroids of less than one
centimeter in diameter that could cause loss of control and prevent post-mission disposal. Eutelsat
has taken steps to limit the effects of such collisions through shielding, the placement of
components, and the use of redundant systems.

The E65WA satellite includes separate TT&C and propulsion subsystems that are necessary for
end-of-life disposal. The spacecraft TT&C system, vital for orbit raising, is extremely rugged with
regard to meteoroids smaller than 1 cm, by virtue of its redundancy, shielding, separation of
components and physical characteristics. Omni-directional antennas are mounted on opposite
sides of the spacecraft. These antennas are extremely rugged and capable of providing adequate
coverage even if struck, bent or otherwise damaged by a small or medium sized particle. Either
one of the two omni-directional antennas, for both command and telemetry, will be sufficient to
enable orbit raising. The redundant command receivers and decoders and redundant telemetry
encoders and transmitters are located within a shielded area. A single rugged thruster and shielded
propellant tank provides the energy for orbit-raising. Otherwise, there are no single points of
failure in the system.

8.2 Minimizing Accidental Explosions

In conjunction with Space Systems/Loral, Eutelsat has assessed and limited the probability of
accidental explosions during and after completion of mission operations. The satellite
manufacturer has taken steps to ensure that debris generation will not result from the conversion
of energy sources on board the satellite into energy that fragments the satellite. In particular, the

6

$satellite manufacturer advises that burst tests are performed on all pressure vessels during qualification testing to demonstrate a margin of safety against burst. Bipropellant mixing is prevented by the use of valves that prevent backwards flow in propellant lines and pressurization lines. All batteries and fuel tanks are monitored for pressure and temperature. Excessive battery charging or discharging is limited by a monitoring and control system which will automatically limit the possibility of fragmentation. Corrective action, if not automatically undertaken, will be immediately undertaken by the spacecraft operator to avoid destruction and fragmentation. Thruster temperatures, impulse and thrust duration are carefully monitored, and any thruster may be turned off via redundant valves. Consequently, there is no possibility of explosion during the operating mission. Space Systems/Loral has also conducted a failure mode effects and criticality analysis as part of the design process. In order to ensure that the spacecraft has no explosive risk after it has been successfully de-orbited, all stored energy onboard the spacecraft will be removed. Upon successful de-orbit of the spacecraft, all propulsion lines and latch valves will be vented and left open. Battery chargers will be turned off and all batteries will be left in a permanent discharge state. Regarding the residual helium pressurant, and taking into account that the E65WA satellite is based on the Space Systems/Loral 1300 model spacecraft, although the helium will be vented as part of the retirement procedures for the satellite, a regulator on the tanks will prevent complete expulsion of the helium. The E65WA propulsion subsystem design, in particular the regulator and downstream check valve characteristics, will ensure that the minimum pressure in the three interconnected helium tanks (65 liters each) will be no higher than 1.6psia (0.11 bar). The specification for the minimum inlet pressure below which that regulator cuts off the flow of helium is 400 psia. Based on that pressure, and assuming a temperature of 298K, the residual helium after depletion is estimated to be approximately 3.5 grams. The tank pressure of 1.6 psia will be a fraction of the tanks’ maximum expected operating pressure, which is 4000 psia. Globecomm seeks a waiver of Section 25.283(c) of the Commission’s Rules with respect to the residual helium that will remain on the E65WA satellite at end of life to the extent necessary to grant this application. That section requires that space station operators take steps as part of the retirement procedures to discharge energy sources on board the satellite, including “relieving 7$

Based on the preceding, Eutelsat concludes that physical coordination of the E65WA satellite with
another party is not required at the present time.

8.4 Post Mission Disposal Plan

At the end of the operational life of the E65WA satellite, it will be maneuvered to a disposal orbit
with a minimum perigee of 300 km above the normal GSO operational orbit. This proposed
disposal orbit altitude is based on the following calculation, as required by Section 25.283:

Total Solar Pressure Area “A” = 97.5 m2
“M” = Dry Mass of Satellite = 2757.5 kg
“CR” = Solar Pressure Radiation Coefficient = 1.24

Therefore the Minimum Disposal Orbit Perigee Altitude:

= 36,021 km + 1000 x CR x A/M
= 36,021 km + 1000 x 1.24 x 97.5/2757.5
= 36,035 km
= 279 km above GSO (35,786 km)

To provide margin, the nominal disposal orbit will be increased to 300 km. This will require 10.8
kg of propellant that will be reserved, taking account of all fuel measurement uncertainties, to
perform the final orbit raising maneuvers.

9 ITU FILINGS

The E65WA satellite network operates under the following two Appendix 30B ITU filings:

B-SAT-3R – AP30B/A6A/254 published in IFIC 2744.

B-SAT-3R-1 – AP30B/A6A/333 published in IFIC 2774.

__________________________________

9

CERTIFICATION OF PERSON RESPONSIBLE FOR PREPARING
ENGINEERING INFORMATION

I hereby certify that I am the technically qualified person responsible for preparation of

the engineering information contained in this “Attachment A Technical Information to

Supplement Schedule S”, that I am familiar with Part 25 of the Commission’s rules that I have

either prepared or reviewed the engineering information submitted in this “Attachment A

Technical Information to Supplement Schedule S”, and that it is complete and accurate to the

best of my knowledge and belief.

/s/ Adrián Pérez Zúñiga
Adrián Pérez Zúñiga
Satellite Coordination Manager
Eutelsat
+ 52 (55) 5804 7314

Exhibit
Radiation Hazard Report Page 2 of 5

1. Far Field Distance Calculation

The distance to the beginning of the far field can be determined from the following equation:

Distance to the Far Field Region Rff = 0.60 D2 / λ (1)
= 2248.7 m

The maximum main beam power density in the far field can be determined from the following
equation:

On-Axis Power Density in the Far Field Sff = G P / (4 π Rff 2) (2)
= 11.664 W/m2
= 1.166 mW/cm2

2. Near Field Calculation

Power flux density is considered to be at a maximum value throughout the entire length of the
defined Near Field region. The region is contained within a cylindrical volume having the same
diameter as the antenna. Past the boundary of the Near Field region, the power density from the
antenna decreases linearly with respect to increasing distance.

The distance to the end of the Near Field can be determined from the following equation:

Extent of the Near Field Rnf = D2 / (4 λ) (3)
= 937.0 m

The maximum power density in the Near Field can be determined from the following equation:

Near Field Power Density Snf = 16.0 η P / (π D2) (4)
= 27.229 W/m2
= 2.723 mW/cm2

3. Transition Region Calculation

The Transition region is located between the Near and Far Field regions. The power density
begins to decrease linearly with increasing distance in the Transition region. While the power
density decreases inversely with distance in the Transition region, the power density decreases
inversely with the square of the distance in the Far Field region. The maximum power density in
the Transition region will not exceed that calculated for the Near Field region. The power density
calculated in Section 1 is the highest power density the antenna can produce in any of the regions
away from the antenna. The power density at a distance Rt can be determined from the following
equation:

Transition Region Power Density St = Snf Rnf / Rt (5)
= 2.723 mW/cm2

Exhibit
Radiation Hazard Report Page 4 of 5

7. Summary of Calculations

Table 4. Summary of Expected Radiation levels for Uncontrolled Environment
Calculated Maximum
Radiation Power Density Level
Region (mW/cm2) Hazard Assessment
1. Far Field (Rff = 2248.7 m) Sff 1.166 Potential Hazard
2. Near Field (Rnf = 937.0 m) Snf 2.723 Potential Hazard
3. Transition Region (Rnf < Rt < Rff) St 2.723 Potential Hazard
4. Between Main Reflector and Ssr 230.153 Potential Hazard
Subreflector
5. Main Reflector Ssurface 3.630 Potential Hazard
6. Between Main Reflector and Ground Sg 0.908 Satisfies FCC MPE

Table 5. Summary of Expected Radiation levels for Controlled Environment
Calculated Maximum
Radiation Power Density
Region Level (mW/cm2) Hazard Assessment
1. Far Field (Rff = 2248.7 m) Sff 1.166 Satisfies FCC MPE
2. Near Field (Rnf = 937.0 m) Snf 2.723 Satisfies FCC MPE
3. Transition Region (Rnf < Rt < Rff) St 2.723 Satisfies FCC MPE
4. Between Main Reflector and Ssr 230.153 Potential Hazard
Subreflector
5. Main Reflector Ssurface 3.630 Satisfies FCC MPE
6. Between Main Reflector and Ground Sg 0.908 Satisfies FCC MPE

It is the applicant's responsibility to ensure that the public and operational personnel are not
exposed to harmful levels of radiation.

8. Conclusions

Based on the above analysis it is concluded that the FCC MPE guidelines have been exceeded (or
met) in the regions of Table 4 and 5. The applicant proposes to comply with the MPE limits by one
or more of the following methods.

Radiation hazard signs will be posted while this earth station is in operation.

Due to the secure location of the proposed earth station antenna at the Hauppauge Teleport, the
area of operation around the antenna will be limited to those that have knowledge of the potential
for radiation exposure. The applicant will ensure that no buildings or other obstacles will be in the
areas that exceed the MPE levels.

ATTACHMENT C

FREQUENCY COORDINATION AND INTERFERENCE
ANALYSIS REPORT

Prepared for
Globecomm License Sub LLC
HAUPPAUGE, NY
(AOT10)
Satellite Earth Station

Prepared By:
COMSEARCH
19700 Janelia Farm Boulevard
Ashburn, VA 20147
September 11, 2018

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. CONCLUSIONS ............................................................................................................................................ 3
2. SUMMARY OF RESULTS ............................................................................................................................ 4
3. SUPPLEMENTAL SHOWING ....................................................................................................................... 5
4. EARTH STATION COORDINATION DATA ................................................................................................ 11
5. CERTIFICATION ......................................................................................................................................... 15

Frequency Coordination and Interference Analysis Report 09/11/2018 Page 2 of 15

1. CONCLUSIONS

An interference study considering all existing, proposed and prior coordinated microwave
facilities within the coordination contours of the proposed earth station demonstrates that
this site will operate satisfactorily with the common carrier microwave environment. Further,
there will be no restrictions of its operation due to interference considerations.

Frequency Coordination and Interference Analysis Report 09/11/2018 Page 3 of 15

2. SUMMARY OF RESULTS

A number of great circle interference cases were identified during the interference study of
the proposed earth station. Each of the cases, which exceeded the interference objective
on a line-of-sight basis, was profiled and the propagation losses estimated using NBS
TN101 (Revised) techniques. The losses were found to be sufficient to reduce the signal
levels to acceptable magnitudes in every case.

The following companies reported potential great circle interference conflicts that did not
meet the objectives on a line-of-sight basis. When over-the-horizon losses are considered
on the interfering paths, sufficient blockage exists to negate harmful interference from
occurring with the proposed transmit-only earth station.

Company

<Companies Responding with Cases>

No other carriers reported potential interference cases.

Frequency Coordination and Interference Analysis Report 09/11/2018 Page 4 of 15

3. SUPPLEMENTAL SHOWING
Pursuant to Part 25.203(c) of the FCC Rules and Regulations, the satellite earth station proposed in this
application was coordinated by Comsearch using computer techniques and in accordance with Part 25 of the
FCC Rules and Regulations.

Coordination data for this earth station was sent to the below listed carriers with a letter dated 07/23/2018.

Company
3G Wireless, LLC
AERIAL VIDEO SYSTEMS
Alascom Inc
Albany, County of
Algonquin Gas Transmission, LLC
American Broadcasting Companies, Inc.
AMFM Radio Licenses, LLC
AQ2AT LLC
Archdiocese of New York Dept of Educatio
Ascent Media Network Services, LLC
AT&T Corp.
Atlantic Telecommunications
Bellsouth Telecommunications, Inc.
Bergen, County of
Bethel CT Police Department
BFI Licenses, LLC
BJ'S Wholesale Club, Inc
Blueline Communications
Borgeson, Tom R.
Broadcast Sports Inc.
Bucks County Dept. of Emergency Comm
Business Only Broadband, LLC
Cablevision Systems of Long Island Corp.
Capital Communications of America
Capital District Trans. Authority
Carolina Telephone and Telegraph Co
Casper, John
CBS Broadcasting Inc
CBS Communications Services Inc
CBS Radio East, LLC.
Cellco Partnership - (W-NY)
Cellco Partnership-Northern New Jersey
Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp.
Central Massachusetts Emergency Medical
CenturyTel of the Southwest, Inc.
Chicago Comnet Corp
Cincinnati Bell Wireless LLC
City of Albany
City of Bethlehem
City of Bristol Mayor's Office
City of Jersey City

Frequency Coordination and Interference Analysis Report 09/11/2018 Page 5 of 15

City of New York
City of Providence RI Public Safety Comm
City of Springfield Police Department
City of Westfield
City of Worcester Emergency Comm Dept
Citywide News Network, Inc.
Citywisper LLC
Clarity Connect, Inc.
Clearwire Spectrum Holdings III, LLC
CMEEC
Columbia, County of
Community Products, LLC
Comprehensive Wireless LLC
Connecticut Public Broadcasting Inc
Connecticut, State of
Conterra Ultra Broadband, LLC
County of Burlington
County of Burlington, Public Safety Cntr
County of Camden
County of Hunterdon
County of Mercer
County of Pike
County of Warren, NJ
Cowboys Stadium LP
Cox Radio Inc
DCI II, INC.
Direct Broadcast Services, Inc.
DSRC Networks
Dutchess County Emergency Response
East Brunswick, Township of, NJ
East Hampton Town Police Department
Eastern MLG LLC
ECW Wireless, LLC
Electric Railroad, LLC
ESPN Inc.
Essex County Sheriff's Office (NJ)
Eversource Energy Service Company
Exelon Generation Company, LLC
FELHC, Inc.
Fishers Island Telephone
Fordham University(WFUV)
Fox Television Stations LLC - WNYW TV
Fox Television Stations, LLC
Frascogna, Carl
Frontier California Inc.
Fundamental Broadcasting LLC
Garden State Transmissions
GAW High-Speed Internet
Geodesic Networks LLC
Glastonbury Police Department
Global Crossing Telecommunications, Inc.
Global Telecom & Technology Americas
Gloucester Township
Goosetown Network Services, LLC
Greenwich, Town of (CT)
GTT America LLC

Frequency Coordination and Interference Analysis Report 09/11/2018 Page 6 of 15

Hallco Unlimited, Inc.
Hamilton, Township of
Hammarlund Research LLC
HARRIS CORPORATION
Hawaiian Telcom, Inc.
Heiden, William
HF Enterprises, Inc
High Voltage Communications LLC (CFN)
Highway Networks, LLC
Holy Name Hospital
Hopewell Radiology Group
Hudson County Prosecutors Office
HUDSON VALLEY WIRELESS
Illinois Bell Telephone Company
Indiana Bell Telephone Company
Industrial Tower and Wireless, LLC
Information & Display Systems, Inc.
Information Super Station, LLC
International Communications Group, Inc.
iSignal
Jackson Twp. Police Department
Jefferson Microwave, LLC
Kentucky RSA #3 Cellular General Partner
Kentucky RSA #4 Cellular General Partner
Kryptick Technologies
Lackawanna County Dept. of Emergency Ser
Lackawanna, County of
Lake Mohegan Fire District
Lakewood Municipal Utilities Authority
LANline Communications, Inc.
Lehigh, County of
Local Media TV Philadelphia
Local TV Pennsylvania License, LLC
Manchester, Township of
Marcus Communications
Massachusetts Commonwealth of
Massachusetts Water Resources Authority
Massachusetts, Commonwealth of
MERCURY COMMUNICATIONS
Meredith Corporation
Michigan Bell Telephone Company
Middlesex, County of
Middletown, City of
Mid-Hudson Cablevision
Mid-Hudson Data Corp
Monmouth, County of
Monroe County Control Center (PA)
Montgomery County Of
Moreen, Steven K
Morris, County of
Nassau County Police Department
National Grid USA Service Company, Inc
National Tower Company LLC
Navajo Communications Company
NBC Telemundo License LLC
NCN Data,LLC

Frequency Coordination and Interference Analysis Report 09/11/2018 Page 7 of 15

New Britain, City of
New Cingular Wireless PCS LLC - NJ
New Cingular Wireless PCS LLC - MA
New Cingular Wireless PCS LLC-DE/NH/RI
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC - PA
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC (NY)
NEW ENGLAND DIGITAL DISTRIBUTION, INC.
New Jersey Public Broadcasting Authority
New Jersey State Police
New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc.
New Jersey Turnpike Authority-Pkwy Div
New Jersey, State of -NJ Transit
New Line Networks, LLC
New York City Police Department
New York City Police TARU
New York City Transit Authority
New York Communications Co., Inc
New York Presbyterian Hospital
New York SMSA Limited Partnership
New York SMSA LP (Northern NJ)
Newark Police Department
NEXSTAR BROADCASTING, INC.
Norcom Communications Corp.
Norfolk County Fire Dispatch
Northrop Grumman Systems Corp.
NorthWest Suburbs Community Access Corp
Norton, Douglas R
NSM Surveillance
Nstar Electric Company
NW Technologies, LLC
NY Dept of Health and Mental Hygiene
NYC DOT Staten Island Ferry
Ocean County of - Div of Wireless Tech.
Ocean, County of
Office of Emergency Telecom Services, NJ
Ohio Bell GTelephone Company
Onboard Images
Optiver GT US, LLC
Orange and Rockland Utilities, Inc.
Orange County Dept of Emergency Services
Orangetown, Town of
Pacific Bell Tel Com dba AT&T California
Peco Energy Company
Penn Service Microwave Co., Inc.
Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission
PhillieCo, L.P.
Pierce Broadband, LLC
Pines Pantry, Inc.
Piscataway, Township Of
Plateau Telecommunications, Inc.
Plum TV, LLC
Pocono Mountain School District
Port Authority of New York & New Jersey
Production & Satellite Services, Inc.
PSEG Services Corporation
Putnam County Bureau of Emerg. Services

Frequency Coordination and Interference Analysis Report 09/11/2018 Page 8 of 15

Qoncept Holdings LLC
Quick Link Connections Inc.
Qwest Corporation
Radiofone, Inc.
Randy Hermes Production
RCC Minnesota Inc. - MN NE ND SD
Remote Broadcasts, Inc.
REMOTE FACILITIES CONSULTING SERVICES
Rensselaer County
RF Central, LLC
RF Film, Inc
Ridgefield Police Department
Rockland, County of
Sanofi Pasteur
Saratoga County Office of Emergency Svcs
Schenectady County Unified Communication
Setauket Fire District
Somerset County (M.I.S.)
Southeastern Pennsylvania Transit Auth
Southington Town of CT
Southwestern Bell Telephone L.P.
Speedshotz, Inc
Spot On Networks
Sprint Spectrum L.P.
Sprintcom, Inc
St Lukes Hospital
Stamford, City of
Standard Backhaul Communications LLC
Startouch, Inc.
State of New Jersey
State of New Jersey Infomation Technolog
State of New York, Div of State Police
State of Rhode Island, EMA
Suffolk County Police Department
Suffolk, County of
Sullivan County DPW
Susquehanna County
Sussex County Sheriffs Office
SW Networks
Telecom Transport Management, Inc
T-Mobile License LLC
Toms River Police Department
Toms River, Township of
Towerstream Corp.
Town of Colonie Police Department
Town of Holden
Town of Narragansett, Rhode Island
Town of Smithtown Dept of Public Safety
Town of Wethersfield
Town of Woodbridge, Police Department
Township of Middletown
Township of Old Bridge
Townsquare Media Atlantic City III Licen
Townsquare Media Monmouth-Ocean License
Townsquare Media Oneonta License, LLC
Transcontinental Gas Pipeline Corp.

Frequency Coordination and Interference Analysis Report 09/11/2018 Page 9 of 15

Transwave Communication Systems, Inc.
TTWN Networks, LLC
Ulster County of
Union County New Jersey
Unisat, Inc.
United Telephone - Southeast
Uniti Fiber PEG, LLC
Verizon Maryland, Inc.
Verizon New England Inc.
Verizon New Jersey, Inc.
Verizon New York, Inc.
Verizon North Inc.
Verizon Northwest Inc.
Verizon Pennsylvania, Inc.
VERIZON SOUTH INC.
Verizon Virginia, Inc.
Verizon Washington DC, Inc.
Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC - Northern NJ
Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC (NY)
Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC-Pennsylvania
VTel Wireless, Inc.
Vyvx, LLC
Wallingford Police Department
Walpole, Town of
Wayne County - DHS-EM
Wayne, Township of
Webline Holdings LLC
Westar Satellite Services LP
Westchester, County of
Westwood, Town of
Winged Vision Inc
Wireless Internetwork LLC
Wisconsin Bell Telephone Company
WNET
Wolfe Air Aviation
World Class Wireless, LLC
WPIX, LLC
WXTV License Partnership, G.P.
xWave Engineering LLC

Frequency Coordination and Interference Analysis Report 09/11/2018 Page 10 of 15

4. EARTH STATION COORDINATION DATA
This section presents the data pertinent to frequency coordination of the proposed earth station that was
circulated to all carriers within its coordination contours.

Frequency Coordination and Interference Analysis Report 09/11/2018 Page 11 of 15

COMSEARCH
Earth Station Data Sheet
19700 Janelia Farm Boulevard, Ashburn, VA 20147
(703)726-5500 http://www.comsearch.com

Date: 07/23/2018
Job Number: 180723COMSGE05
Administrative Information
Status ENGINEER PROPOSAL
Call Sign E990402
Licensee Code SWSITE
Licensee Name Globecomm License Sub LLC
Site Information HAUPPAUGE, NY
Venue Name AOT 10
Latitude (NAD 83) 40° 48' 54.1" N
Longitude (NAD 83) 73° 14' 17.8" W
Climate Zone A
Rain Zone 2
Ground Elevation (AMSL) 33.5 m / 109.9 ft
Link Information
Satellite Type Geostationary
Mode TR - Transmit-Receive
Modulation Digital
Satellite Arc 65° W to 65° West Longitude
Azimuth Range 167.5° to 167.5°
Corresponding Elevation Angles 42.1° / 42.1°
Antenna Centerline (AGL) 5.49 m / 18.0 ft
Antenna Information Receive - FCC32 Transmit - FCC32
Manufacturer Vertex Vertex
Model 9.3 KPK 9.3 KPK
Gain / Diameter 59.3 dBi / 9.3 m 60.8 dBi / 9.3 m
3-dB / 15-dB Beamwidth 0.20° / 0.40° 0.16° / 0.32°

Max Available RF Power (dBW/4 kHz) -15.3
(dBW/MHz) 8.7

Maximum EIRP (dBW/4 kHz) 45.5
(dBW/MHz) 69.5

Interference Objectives: Long Term -156.0 dBW/MHz 20% -154.0 dBW/4 kHz 20%
Short Term -146.0 dBW/MHz 0.01% -131.0 dBW/4 kHz 0.0025%
Frequency Information Receive 12.0 GHz Transmit 13.0 GHz
Emission / Frequency Range (MHz) 36M0G7W / 10701.0 – 10944.5 36M0G7W / 12751 – 12994.5

Max Great Circle Coordination Distance 233.3 km / 145.0 mi 123.5 km / 76.7 mi
Precipitation Scatter Contour Radius 100.0 km / 62.1 mi 100.0 km / 62.1 mi

Frequency Coordination and Interference Analysis Report 09/11/2018 Page 12 of 15

COMSEARCH
Earth Station Data Sheet
19700 Janelia Farm Boulevard, Ashburn, VA 20147
(703)726-5500 http://www.comsearch.com

Coordination Values HAUPPAUGE, NY
Licensee Name Globecomm License Sub LLC
Latitude (NAD 83) 40° 48' 54.1" N
Longitude (NAD 83) 73° 14' 17.8" W
Ground Elevation (AMSL) 33.5 m / 109.9 ft
Antenna Centerline (AGL) 5.49 m / 18.0 ft
Antenna Model Vertex 9.3 meter
Antenna Mode Receive 12.0 GHz Transmit 14.0 GHz
Interference Objectives: Long Term -156.0 dBW/MHz 20% -154.0 dBW/4 kHz 20%
Short Term -146.0 dBW/MHz 0.01% -131.0 dBW/4 kHz 0.0025%
Max Available RF Power -15.3 (dBW/4 kHz)

Receive 12.0 GHz Transmit 14.0 GHz
Horizon Antenna Horizon Coordination Horizon Coordination
Azimuth (°) Elevation (°) Discrimination (°) Gain (dBi) Distance (km) Gain (dBi) Distance (km)
0 0.00 136.46 -10.00 227.19 -10.00 119.95
5 0.00 135.08 -10.00 227.19 -10.00 119.95
10 0.00 133.31 -10.00 227.19 -10.00 119.95
15 0.00 131.20 -10.00 227.19 -10.00 119.95
20 0.00 128.78 -10.00 227.19 -10.00 119.95
25 0.00 126.10 -10.00 227.19 -10.00 119.95
30 0.00 123.20 -10.00 227.19 -10.00 119.95
35 0.00 120.11 -10.00 227.19 -10.00 119.95
40 0.00 116.88 -10.00 227.19 -10.00 119.95
45 0.00 113.52 -10.00 227.19 -10.00 119.95
50 0.00 110.06 -10.00 227.19 -10.00 119.95
55 0.00 106.52 -10.00 227.19 -10.00 119.95
60 0.00 102.91 -10.00 227.19 -10.00 119.95
65 0.00 99.26 -10.00 227.19 -10.00 119.95
70 0.00 95.57 -10.00 227.19 -10.00 119.95
75 0.00 91.87 -10.00 227.19 -10.00 119.95
80 0.00 88.15 -10.00 227.19 -10.00 119.95
85 0.26 84.43 -10.00 221.80 -10.00 115.60
90 0.35 80.71 -10.00 212.63 -10.00 107.92
95 0.45 77.02 -10.00 204.84 -10.00 101.07
100 0.23 73.44 -10.00 223.81 -10.00 117.23
105 0.00 69.96 -10.00 227.19 -10.00 119.95
110 0.00 66.50 -10.00 227.19 -10.00 119.95
115 0.00 63.14 -10.00 227.19 -10.00 119.95
120 0.63 59.58 -10.00 196.60 -10.00 100.00
125 0.64 56.44 -10.00 195.82 -10.00 100.00
130 0.32 53.71 -10.00 215.87 -10.00 110.67
135 0.41 50.94 -10.00 207.93 -10.00 103.83
140 0.25 48.62 -10.00 222.08 -10.00 115.83
145 0.00 46.70 -9.73 228.36 -9.73 120.63
150 0.00 44.92 -9.31 230.20 -9.31 121.69
155 0.00 43.55 -8.97 231.71 -8.97 122.54
160 0.00 42.60 -8.74 232.78 -8.74 123.15
165 0.00 42.12 -8.61 233.33 -8.61 123.46
170 0.00 42.12 -8.61 233.34 -8.61 123.46
175 0.43 42.17 -8.63 211.37 -8.63 105.39
180 0.62 42.95 -8.82 201.51 -8.82 100.00
185 0.78 44.21 -9.14 192.26 -9.14 100.00

Frequency Coordination and Interference Analysis Report 09/11/2018 Page 13 of 15

Document Created: 2018-09-11 13:37:34
Document Modified: 2018-09-11 13:37:34