Panasonic 1 65 Orbit

Section 1.65 Notification submitted by Panasonic Avionics Corporation

Section 1.65 Letter re Superbird C2 and Apstar 7

2014-03-10

This document pretains to SES-MFS-20130930-00845 for Modification w/ Foreign Satellite (earth station) on a Satellite Earth Station filing.

IBFS_SESMFS2013093000845_1039072

                                                                                                Squire Sanders (US) LLP
                                                                                                1200 19th Street, NW
                                                                                                Suite 300
                                                                                                Washington, D.C. 20036

                                                                                                O +1 202 626 6600
                                                                                                F +1 202 626 6780
                                                                                                squiresanders.com



                                                                                                Carlos M. Nalda
                                                                                                T +1 202 626 6659
                                                                                                carlos.nalda@squiresanders.com

March 10, 2014

VIA ELECTRONIC FILING
Marlene H. Dortch
Secretary
Federal Communications Commission
445 12th Street, SW
Washington, DC 20554

Re:        Application of Panasonic Avionics Corporation,
           File No. SES-MFS-20130930-00845 (Call Sign E100089)

Dear Ms. Dortch:

        Pursuant to Section 1.65 of the Commission’s Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.65, and in response to
Commission correspondence dated February 12, 2014,1 Panasonic Avionics Corporation
(“Panasonic”) hereby submits additional orbital debris/end of life information to supplement the
information provided by satellite operators in connection with Panasonic’s request to add the
Superbird C2 and Apstar 7 satellites as authorized points of communication. Panasonic provides
the following information to clarify and correct certain information included in Panasonic’s
modification application filed on September 30, 2013.2

              I.      Additional Information for Superbird C2

       The International Bureau Letter requests clarification of certain issues associated with the
End of Life Disposal and Debris Mitigation Plan submitted for the Superbird C2 satellite,3
including confirmation of: (i) the volume of each helium tank; (ii) helium tank interconnection
and volume of plumbing in liters; (iii) whether the stated mass of helium is end-of-life or launch


1
 See Letter from Jose Albuquerque, Chief, Satellite Division of the FCC International Bureau, to
Carlos M. Nalda, Counsel for Panasonic Avionics Corporation, Squire Sanders (US) LLP, dated
Feb. 12, 2014 (“International Bureau Letter”).
2
 See Application of Panasonic Avionics Corporation; File No. SES-MFS-20130930-00845 (Call
Sign E100089) (“Modification Application”).
3
    See id., Technical Appendix at 6-5.
37 Offices in 18 Countries
Squire Sanders (US) LLP is part of the international legal practice Squire Sanders which operates worldwide through a number of separate legal
entities.

Please visit squiresanders.com for more information.


Squire Sanders (US) LLP                                             March 10, 2014




volume; (iv) the temperature in kelvins for the pressure calculation; and (v) the estimated
pressure calculation and calculated value.

       After additional consultations with Sky Perfect JSAT (“SP-JSAT”), operator of the
Superbird C2 satellite, Panasonic provides the following clarifying information in response to the
Commission’s inquiry:

          (i) the volume of each helium tank is approximately 81.39 liters, so the total volume of
              both tanks is 162.78 liters;

          (ii) the two helium tanks are interconnected but there is insufficient information regarding
               the plumbing volume to provide specific volume information (see below regarding
               actual data on combined system pressure);

          (iii) the stated mass of helium (6.4 kg) is end-of-life, as calculated using tank
               temperatures and the common pressure for the system (tanks and plumbing) received
               via telemetry data;

          (iv) the range of temperature in kelvins used for the pressure calculation is from 279.6ºK
              to 289.5ºK; and

          (v) the estimated pressure (2.07-2.40 megapascales) is correct and is based on telemetry
              data received almost six months after in-orbit testing; because this is an actual
              pressure value, no detailed explanation of an estimated pressure calculation is
              provided (but the calculation does approximate the helium mass reported above).

           II.    Additional Information for Apstar 7

         The International Bureau Letter also requests clarification of certain issues associated
with the Statement of Conformity submitted for the Apstar 7 satellite,4 including confirmation of:
(i) the correct number and volume of helium tanks; (ii) helium tank interconnection and volume
of plumbing in liters; (iii) whether the stated mass of helium is end-of-life; (iv) the temperature
in kelvins for the pressure calculation; and (v) a detailed explanation of the estimated pressure
calculation and, if necessary, the correct pressure value.

         After consultations between APT Satellite Company Limited (“APT”), operator of the
Apstar 7 satellite, and Thales Alenia Space (“TAS”), manufacturer of the satellite, Panasonic
confirms that certain information provided initially by APT was not accurate. Accordingly,
Panasonic provides an updated Statement of Conformity from APT regarding the Apstar 7
satellite which should replace the previous Statement of Conformity, as well as the following
clarifying information in response to the Commission’s inquiry:
4
    See id. at 3-5.




                                                                                                       2


Squire Sanders (US) LLP                                             March 10, 2014




         (i) there are two (2) helium tanks, each with a volume of 91 liters;

         (ii) the helium tanks are interconnection but there is insufficient information regarding
              the plumbing volume to provide specific volume information (see below regarding
              actual data on combined system pressure);

         (iii) the originally stated mass of helium was actually the mass at launch rather than end-
              of-life; the estimate end-of-life mass of helium is 2.1 kg in the tanks and tubing based
              on TAS software modeling (see below for confirmatory calculation);

         (iv) the temperature in kelvins for the pressure calculation is 283ºK; and

         (v) the residual pressure of the tanks and plumbing is 74 bars, as confirmed from
             telemetry data received from the satellite; using this pressure value, the calculation of
             remaining helium mass is:

         PV=nRT where

         P is pressure in Pa
         V is volume in m3
         n is the number of moles in mole
         R is the universal gas constant
         T is temperature in K

         For Apstar 7 case:

              P = 74bar =74 x105Pa;
              V = 2x 91Lx10-3m3
              R = 8.3144621 J·K-1·mol-1
              T = 10C°= 283K

         In addition, the known mass of a Helium atom per mole is 4.00260 g.mol-1. So, the mass
         (M) of remaining helium in both helium tanks and tubing are roughly estimated as:


         M


         = 2.29kg

         This theoretical result approximates to 2.1 kg which was came out more precisely from
         the software model and declared by TAS.




                                                                                                         3


Squire Sanders (US) LLP                                           March 10, 2014




         III.     Further Information and Waiver Request

        Panasonic would be pleased to facilitate further discussions with SP-JSAT and APT with
respect any additional information the Commission may require regarding the Superbird C2 and
Apstar 7 satellites. In the meantime, Panasonic respectfully requests that the Commission accept
the additional information provided by SP-JSAT and APT as sufficient for public notice of the
subject application, and waive any rules or policies necessary to further consider and ultimately
add the Superbird C2 and Apstar 7 satellites as authorized points of communication.

         Any necessary waiver would serve the public interest because access to these in-orbit
satellites would allow U.S.-registered aircraft to access the satellite like their foreign
counterparts. In addition, because actual helium pressure in the interconnected system has been
reported via telemetry data and is a small fraction of rated pressure of the system for each
satellite, any uncertainty with respect to plumbing volume need not alter the conclusion that the
Superbird C2 and Apstar 7 satellites satisfy the Commission’s end-of-life and orbital debris
mitigation policies.

                                                 * * * *

       Please feel free to contact the undersigned with any questions you may have or if
Panasonic can provide any additional information to facilitate expeditious action on its
application.

                                               Respectfully submitted,

                                               Squire Sanders (US) LLP




                                               Carlos M. Nalda

                                               Counsel to Panasonic Avionics Corporation

Attachment

cc (w/ att.):     Jose Albuquerque, Satellite Division, FCC International Bureau
                  Stephen Duall, Satellite Division, FCC International Bureau
                  Paul Blais, Satellite Division, FCC International Bureau




                                                                                                    4


                   Statement on Conformity of APSTAR-7 Satellite
                with FCC Rules regarding Orbital Debris Mitigation

APT Satellite Company Limited (“APT”) provides the following showing regarding compliance
with 47 C.F.R. § 25.114(d)(14)(i)-(iv) and §25.283 of the Federal Communications Commission's
(“FCC”) rules regarding the orbital debris mitigation/end-of-life disposal of the APSTAR-7
satellite. In addition, APT acknowledges that the APSTAR-7 orbital debris mitigation/end-of-life
disposal plan is consistent with guidelines issued by the Office of Telecommunications Authority
(“OFTA”) of Hong Kong in             July 2007.    (http://tel_archives.ofca.gov.hk/en/report-paper-
guide/guidance-notes/gn_200706.pdf)



a.     Debris Release Assessment-§25.114(d)(14)(i).
APT has assessed the operations of APSTAR-7 and has determined that no debris has been released
by the spacecraft. All separation and deployment mechanisms were fully controlled by Thales
Alenia Space and the launching service provider and no debris is planned to leave the spacecraft
after the commission of service.


In the spacecraft integration and manufacturing phase, the stiffness and strength of the satellite
structure are verified by a series of test, including the vibration and acoustics test. These tests
prove that the structure is tough enough to provide the protection of the satellite components and
capable to reduce generation of space debris to the maximum extent possible during a collision.
All critical components (i.e. the Service Module, the Communication Module and the Upper
Module) are built within the structure.


The APSTAR-7 spacecraft can be controlled through both the normal dish antennas and omni
antennas. In the different FDIR (Failure, Discovery, Isolation and Recovery) mode (Normal Mode,
Earth Pointing Mode, Inertial Attitude Acquisition Mode and Sun Acquisition Mode), the omni and
dish antennas can be used functionally.


Furthermore, the spacecraft redundancy scheme protects against the failure of any one
component by having spare components available. In case, if the primary component fails, the


other redundant unit remains functional to maintain the satellites mission. The reliability has
been assessed for each subsystem and for each phase of the mission, based on the analysis, the
bus reliability is greater than 0.89 at 15 years and 0.92 at 13 years. According to the goal of the
design, there is no item in the bus whose failure will cause loss of the satellite m ission unless
that item has a probability of success that is superior or equal to 0.99 for 15 years . This
redundancy scheme should ensure the control and de-orbit capability of the satellite after a
collision.

b.      Accidental Explosion Assessment-§25.114(d)(14)(ii).
APT has conducted the assessment the possibility of an accidental explosion onboard APSTAR-7 via
reviewing failure modes for all equipment. In order to ensure that the spacecraft does not explode on
orbit, the designers of the spacecraft have taken specific precautions. All batteries and fuel tanks are
monitored for pressure or temperature variations. Alarms in the SCC (Satellite Control Center) inform
controllers of any variations. Additionally, long-term trending analysis will be performed to monitor
for any unexpected trends. Operationally, batteries will be operated utilizing the manufacturer's
automatic recharging scheme during eclipse season. This scheme will ensure that the batteries will not
over-charge.    Under the FDIR process, in the event that an overcharge condition is detected,
overcharge protection will be triggered to prevent from overheated and do not raise its internal
pressure for Li-Ion battery cells.

APSTAR-7 uses a bipropellant system. In order to protect the propulsion system, fuel tanks
will all be operated in a blow down mode. At the completion of orbit-raising, the helium
pressurant was isolated from the fuel system by the firing of pyrotechnic valves. This causes
the pressure in the tanks to decrease over the life of the spacecraft. In order to ensure that the
spacecraft has no explosive risk after it has been successfully de-orbited, all stored energy
onboard the spacecraft will be removed except for a small amount of pressurant remaining
when the valves were sealed after orbit raising, discussed below in Section (d).

Upon successful de-orbit of the spacecraft, based on the procedure, all propulsion lines and latch
valves will be vented and left open. All battery chargers will be turned off and batteries will be left
in a permanent discharge state. These steps will ensure that no buildup of energy can occur resulting
in an explosion after the spacecraft is de-orbited.


c.      Assessment Regarding Collision with Larger Debris and Other Space Stations -
        §25.114(d)(14)(iii).
APT has also conducted the assessment of the probability of APSTAR-7 becoming a source of
debris by collisions with large debris or other operational space stations. The probability of the
collision between APSTAR-7 and other Space stations is negligible since an Orbital Analyst
regularly determines the satellite’s orbit trends and assess the risk of collision based on ranging
result. As a standard practice, in case of other satellite flyby or collocation with APSTAR-7, the
orbital ephemeris data of both sides is exchanged prior to and during operations and the maneuver
plan is adjusted accordingly. In addition, a collision precaution system is developed internally based
on the data source on website of http://celestrak.com/NORAD/elements/ to track all GEO satellites
and alert any satellite(s) getting closer to APT’ fleet, facilitate APT to take appropriate measures to
avoid collision. The below is list of adjacent satellites recorded recently according to our system:




APT will maintain APSTAR-7 within 0.05° of the assigned orbital position (76.5 E.L.) in both the
longitude and latitude, this orbit is mainly for geo-stationary satellite, all of the necessary
coordination agreements have been successfully completed and signed to ensure the stable and
interference-free operation of APSTAR-7 at this orbital slot, and all such notification information
has been filed and registered with ITU. APT will continue to monitor launch details to verify that no


new spacecraft takes residence in the vicinity of the APSTAR-7 spacecraft unless ongoing
operational coordination is conducted with the nearby satellite(s).

d.      Post-Mission Disposal Plans-§25.114(d)(14)(iv) and §25.283.

At the completion of its mission, APSTAR-7 will be removed from its geostationary orbit at 76.5
E.L. to a perigee altitude no less than 274.5 km above the standard geostationary orbit of 35,786 km.
This post-disposal perigee takes into account gravitational perturbations and solar radiation pressure
that could alter the satellite orbit in the years after decommissioning. APT has planned the tracking
telemetry and control transmissions required for end-of-life repositioning so as to avoid electrical
interference to other space stations, and coordinated with any potentially affected satellite networks.


Further, in accordance with Section 25.283(c), the minimum post-mission disposal altitude above
the geostationary-Earth orbit (i.e., minimum perigee) is calculated as follows (using the relevant
IADC formula):

                              235 km + (1000·CR·A/M)
                              =235 km +1000×79/2000
                              =274.5 km
Here:
        CR =Solar radiation pressure coefficient;
        A= Average cross sectional area based on deployed on-station configuration;
        Notes: CR·A is a parameter derived by Orbital determination software ≈79 m2;
        M= Satellite dry mass ≈2,000 kg (the satellite mass at de-orbit);

The amount of fuel reserved for the post-mission orbital raising is shown below:
Disposal altitude: GEO + 300 km (set 300 km as a target to instead 274.5 km to cover
  uncertainties);
Required Delta V: 10.94 m/s;
Required fuel (reserved): 9.56 kg.

The propellant needed to achieve the minimum deorbit altitude is based on the delta-V required and
specified by the spacecraft manufacturer, the required mass of propellant for de-orbit operation will
be reserved in the tank before the end of life. Propellant tracking is accomplished using a
bookkeeping method, this method is provided by the satellite manufacture with a good accuracy.


Any propellant in excess of expected bookkeeping values will be consumed by further raising the
orbit until combustion is no longer possible.


Finally, all stored energy sources on board the satellite will be discharged by venting excess
propellant, discharging batteries, relieving pressure vessels, and other appropriate measures. The
table below provides further information regarding the amount of helium (pressure, container and
volume) from the APSTAR-7 propulsion system remaining at end-of-life:

                                APSTAR-7 (SB4000C2)
           container                        status on end of life
               1         fuel        vent by leaving thruster valve open
               2         oxidizer    vent by leaving thruster valve open
               3         helium          sealed: 91litre,74bar,10°C
               4         helium          sealed: 91litre,74bar,10°C

As noted above, propellant and oxidizer tanks will be vented at end-of-life by leaving the thruster
valve open. The two (2) helium tanks, however, are isolated and sealed, cannot be reopened and
will have a total estimated mass of 2.1 kg of helium remaining at the end-of-life including both
tanks and tubing. The existence of residual helium is a result of the satellite design – isolating
the helium tanks after orbit-raising reduces the risks associated with valves between these tanks
and pressurized fuel/oxidizer tanks during the long operating life of the satellite and the
remaining helium pressure is well below the design tolerance of the tanks as the proof pressure
of tank is 442.5 bar. Accordingly, APT requests a waiver of §25.283 of the Commission’s rules
with respect to the remaining helium because only direct retrieval of the spacecraft would allow
APT to recover and discharge the sealed helium.
Yours truly,


APT Satellite Company Limited



Document Created: 2014-03-09 07:05:15
Document Modified: 2014-03-09 07:05:15

© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC