Attachment 20130702132522.pdf

20130702132522.pdf

DECISION submitted by Paul Blais

Grant Letter

2013-07-02

This document pretains to SES-MFS-20121112-01001 for Modification w/ Foreign Satellite (earth station) on a Satellite Earth Station filing.

IBFS_SESMFS2012111201001_1002843

Eleanor Lott OeC From: Paul Blais Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2013 12:27 PM To: Eleanor Lott; Towanda Bryant Co: Hsing Liu Subject: RE: Granting of these applications? I see that for: SES—MFS—20121112—01000 exhibit A states that they are submitting: * No change in frequencies (Particulars of Operations Nos. 1—4 on License) * Add frequency coordination 11700 — 12200 MHz (Frequency Coordination on License) * No change to ALSAT Point of Communication (Point of Communications No. 1 on License) * Add new Point of Communication Satmex—8 @ 116.8 W.L. (Non—U.S. licensed) (Point of Communications on License) * No change to antenna facilities (Antenna Facilities Nos. 1 on License) The previous applications SES—RWL—20100105—00006, SES—RWL—20000105—00011and SES—MOD—19910521— 01426 were granted without that information either. Since the emission designator 2M00G1D means that only one carrier is being modulated and the Max EIRP/Carrier has been authorized for 78.70 and the max antenna gain is 57 dBi that would mean E38 should be 78.7— 57= 21.7 dBW= and E40 should be 78.70 dBW. Ihave made these changes in the record and copied this note into the notes tab. Please proceed with the grant. SES—MFS—20121112—01001 the same statement as SES—MFS—20121112—01000 and the previous licenses, were also granted without that information. Since the emission designator 2M00G1ID means that only one carrier is being modulated and the Max EIRP/Carrier has been authorized for 82.7 and the max antenna gain is 60.4 dBi that would mean E38 should be 82.7— 60.4= 22.3 dBw= Wand E40 should be §2.7 dBW. I have made these changes in the record and copied this note into the notes tab. Please proceed with the grant. SES—MFS—20121112—01002 did not have the problem that you identified for SES—MFS—20121112— 01000 &SES—MFS—20121112—01001. So no changes were needed. Please proceed with the grant. Paul Blais Chief, Systems Analysis Branch International Bureau, Federal Communications Commission 202.418.7274 From: Eleanor Lott Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2013 10:49 AM To: Paul Blais; Towanda Bryant Subject: RE: Granting of these applications?

OK From: Paul Blais Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2013 8:14 AM To: Towanda Bryant; Eleanor Lott Subject: Re: Granting of these applications? Thank you very much. I will take another look at them today. From: Towanda Bryant Sent: Monday, July 01, 2013 05:12 PM To: Eleanor Lott; Paul Blais Subject: RE: Granting of these applications? I will unclick mine as well to be sure they are going out correctly. T. From: Eleanor Lott Sent: Monday, July 01, 2013 5:09 PM To: Paul Blais Co: Towanda Bryant; Eleanor Lott Subject: Granting of these applications? Paul, I don‘t think we should grant these: Omnitracs, Inc./Qualcomm Incorporated Because on my 2 below they do not have the Antenna watts and (dBw) on FCC form 312 E38 and E40 information and I flag for Hsing when he review for PN? The applicant didn‘t provide that information either. | just going to unclick the buttons so that they won‘t show up on Action taken PN until tomorrow when Hsing gets back? They are going out not correct Licenses. SES—MEFS—20121112—01000 SES—MFS—20121112—01001 Thanks Eleanor


Document Created: 2019-04-25 04:51:34
Document Modified: 2019-04-25 04:51:34
© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC