Attachment Narrative

This document pretains to SES-MFS-20110701-00767 for Modification w/ Foreign Satellite (earth station) on a Satellite Earth Station filing.

IBFS_SESMFS2011070100767_901684

                                                            EXHIBIT A
                                                            HNS License Sub, LLC
                                                            FCC Form 312
                                                            Amendment
                                                            July 2011

                                  Description of Application

       HNS License Sub, LLC (“Hughes”) hereby amends its pending application for

modification of the earth station license for Call Sign E060445 (File No. SES-MFS-20100419-

00452 (“Modification Application”) to request authority to add two new types of temporary-

fixed transmit/receive antennas to its Ka-band VSAT license. In particular, Hughes proposes to

add 1,000 AvL Technologies Model 1010K 98 centimeter temporary-fixed transmit/receive

antennas and 1,000 AvL Technologies Model 1210K 1.2 meter temporary-fixed transmit/receive

antennas. Both types of antennas would operate only in the 19.7-20.2 GHz (space-to-Earth) and

29.5-30 GHz (Earth-to-space) fixed-satellite service (“FSS”) bands. The requested antennas, like

the other antennas already on the license, will operate in a mesh network and provide digital

services.

       The Ka-band frequencies in which these facilities are to be licensed are not shared with

terrestrial users. Each of the new proposed antenna types is compliant with the Commission’s

Ka-band service rules of Section 25.138 and 25.209(a) and (b).

Points of Communication

       Hughes requests authority to communicate via the proposed antennas with the

SPACEWAY 3 satellite operated by Hughes’s parent company, Hughes Network Systems, LLC.

This means that the current SPACEWAY 3 authorization from the Commission, and the

proposed re-flagged SPACEWAY 3 satellite as described in the Modification Application would

need to be identified as points of communication for the new antennas.


                                                                                           Exhibit A
                                                                                          Page 2 of 3


       Hughes also proposes to add AMC-15 and AMC-16 as points of communication for the

new antennas, and also for all currently-authorized antennas on the license for Call Sign

E060445. In the Form 312 amendment application to which this exhibit is attached, Hughes

provides only the information it needs for the current antennas to show the new points of

communications. There are no technical changes to any of the currently-authorized antennas --

just the addition of the points of communication. In each case, all existing authorized

information is incorporated by reference.


Remote Control

       All of the terminals requested here will be remotely controlled by Hughes from its

Germantown, Maryland network operations center.


Radiation Hazard Analyses

       A radiation hazard analysis with regard to the two proposed new antenna types has been

carried out using the predicitve methodology identified in OET Bulletin 65. The results are

provided in Exhibits B-1 and B-2 to this Amendment.

       The analysis was based on clear sky radiation levels for which a maximum RF power at

the antenna flange of 3.3 Watts for the 1 meter antenna and 4.6 Watts for the 1.2 meter antenna.

The maximum uplink power control power was not considered in this analysis as it is used only

for very short periods of time during rain. Both the time averaging of the RF power received by

a human body during a short but intense rain event combined with the unlikely possibility that a

person would stand immediately in front of the transmitter during a heavy rain storm construe to

make this an unrealistic scenario.


                                                                                             Exhibit A
                                                                                            Page 3 of 3


        The clear sky results included in Exhibits B-1 and B-2 show that the average exposure

levels for the protection of the general public are met in the near field, transition field, far field as

well as between the reflector and ground. As is typically the case with parabolic antennas, the

average exposure level for the protection of the general public is exceeded between the feed horn

and the reflector.

        Since these are auto-deploying antennas terminals which are to be installed on the roof of

larger vehicles, the bottom of the beam of the antenna will always be above the head of anyone

standing by the vehicle, making it difficult to access those areas of the antenna where the

exposure limit is exceeded. To ensure that members of the general public which may be in

proximity to the vehicle do not accidently access the hazardous area between the horn and

reflector, warning labels will be applied to the antenna feed arm, warning of the possible

radiation hazard.


New antenna pattern information

        Antenna pattern information for the AvL Technologies Model Nos. 1010K and 1210K

antennas is provided in Exhibit C below.



Document Created: 2011-07-01 12:32:03
Document Modified: 2011-07-01 12:32:03

© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC