Attachment Narrative

This document pretains to SES-LIC-INTR2019-02413 for License on a Satellite Earth Station filing.

IBFS_SESLICINTR201902413_1730097

                        Application for Blanket Earth Station Authorization

Overview

        Swarm Technologies, Inc. (“Swarm”) is a U.S. corporation that has applied to launch and

operate an innovative constellation of 150 small two-way communications satellites in the non-

voice, non-geostationary (“NVNG”) Mobile-Satellite Service (“MSS”). 1 Swarm’s proposed

satellite constellation will provide global data services to industry, government, nonprofit, and

research and development users. By leveraging advances in small satellite technology and the

increased availability of launch opportunities, the Swarm constellation will be deployed rapidly

and will provide connectivity at far lower costs than have been previously possible.

        In this application, Swarm seeks a blanket authorization pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 25.115(d)

for operation of up to 1,000,000 Customer Mobile Earth Station (“CMES”) devices that end users

will employ to communicate with Swarm’s satellite constellation. The devices will operate on

frequencies in the 148-149.95 MHz (uplink) and 137-138 MHz (downlink) bands, consistent with

Swarm’s space station application. 2 Swarm seeks authorization for CMES devices to be deployed

and operated throughout the continental United States, Alaska, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, Guam, the

U.S. Virgin Islands, all U.S. territories and possessions, and all U.S. territorial waters. CMES

devices may use one of several antennas, depending on the application. The characteristics of each

proposed terminal are provided in the accompanying Schedule B, as is the quantity to be licensed

for each terminal type.

        In the following narrative and in the accompanying Form 312, Swarm demonstrates that

the proposed devices comply with all technical and operational requirements and that grant of this


1
    Swarm Technologies, Inc., Application for Authority to Launch and Operate Non-Voice, Non-Geostationary
    Lower Earth Orbit Satellite System in the Mobile-Satellite Services, IBFS File No. SAT-LOA-20181221-00094
    (filed Dec. 21, 2018) (“Space Station Application”).
2
    Space Station Application Narrative Exhibit at 9.


                                                        1


application would serve the public interest. Swarm will deploy its constellation rapidly upon

approval of its pending space station application, and will beprepared to offer commercial services

even prior to full deployment ofits constellation. Swarm therefore requests that the Commission

grant the requested authorization ofthe ground segment of Swarm‘s network as expeditiously as

possible.

Frequencies and Emissions

            To supplement the information provided in the Form 312, Main Form and Schedule B,

additional information regarding the operating frequencies and emission characteristics of

Swarm‘s CMES devices is provided below.

Frequencies

            A complete listing of the requested frequencies on which Swarm‘s CMES devices will

transmit and receiveis provided in Table 1. These frequencies are identical to those requested in

Swarm‘s Part 25 application for the corresponding 150—satellite system.>

Table 1. Frequencies on which Swarm CMES devices will transmit and receive.
   Lower Frequency          Upper Frequency     Transmit or Receive                 Nature of
         (MHz)                  (MHz)                    Mode                        Service
             137.0250               137.1750                  Receive              NVNG MSS
             137.3275               137.3750                  Receive              NVNG MSS
             137.4725               137.5350                  Receive              NVNG MSS
             137.5850               137.6500                  Receive              NVNG MSS
             137.8125               138.0000                  Receive              NVNG MSS
             148.2500               148.5850                 Transmit              NVNG MSS
             148.6350               148.7500                 Transmit              NVNG MSS
             149.9000               149.9500                 Transmit              NVNG MSS




3 See id.


Emission Characteristics

        Swarm proposes to operate CMES devices on multiple channels within the uplink and

downlink frequencies provided in Table 1. Both the Swarm satellites and CMES devices are

capable of operating with a variety of emissions designators to meet the diverse needs of

customers, and Swarm may vary, within the range specified in this application, the bandwidth of

channels on which CMES devices transmit and receive to best serve customer needs and maximize

spectral efficiency. Consistent with 47 C.F.R. § 25.275, Swarm specifies in Schedule B only those

carriers with the highest Effective Isotropic Radiated Power (“EIRP”) density, narrowest

bandwidth, and largest bandwidth, and will transmit using emissions not specifically listed only if

doing so would “not exceed the highest EIRP, EIRP density, and bandwidth prescribed for any

listed emission.” 4 For completeness, information regarding the characteristics of additional

emissions designators and their corresponding power, EIRP, and EIRP density levels is provided

in Table 2 below. In each case, the assigned bandwidth includes an appropriate frequency

allowance to account for Doppler shift and frequency tolerance. Emissions specified in Schedule

B are highlighted in blue and define the maximum bandwidth, EIRP, and EIRP density with which

CMES terminals will transmit. Swarm notes that the maximum power level requested for CMES

terminals differs from the power level assumed in the reverse link budget that Swarm provided for

illustrative purposes in the narrative to its space station application. 5 There have been no changes

to the link budget for the space to ground link at issue in that application.




4
    47 C.F.R. § 25.275(c).
5
    Space Station Application, Narrative at 27-28.


                                                     3


Table 2. Potential bandwidths,        wer levels. and EIRP levels for Swarm CMES transmissions.©



                      (kHz)              (kHz)
   7K8FID               7.8                16.0              5.0           12.5                  9.6

   10K4FID              10.4              20.0               5.0           12.5                  8.3

   15K6FID              15.6              24.0               5.0           12.5                  6.6

   20K8FID             20.8               30.0               5.0           12.5                  5.3

   31K3FID             31.3               40.0               5.0           12.5                  3.6

   41K7FID             41.7               50.0               5.0           12.5                  2.3

   62KSFID             62.5               72.0               5.0           12.5                  0.6

  125KOFID             125.0              134.0              5.0           12.5                  —2.5

  250KOFID             250.0              259.0              5.0           12.5                  —5.5


Out—of—Band Emissions (47 C.F.R. § 25.202(f)

       As demonstrated below, the spectrum masks for Swarm CMES emissions comply with

the limits set forth in Section 25.202(f) ofthe Commission‘s rules."




   To provide an upper bound on the maximum EIRP and EIRP density levels, the values provided in Table 2 were
   calculated using the maximum antenna gain of 5.5 dBi. As described in the accompanying Form 312, CMES
   devices will use antennas with gain ranging from —10.0 dBi to 5.5 dBi.
   Figures 1—3 reflect Swarm‘s nominal initial plan for communications links, which consists of channels with a
   necessary bandwidth of 20.8 kHz and an assigned bandwidth of 30.0 kHz to account for Doppler shift and
   frequency tolerance. Transmissions using alternative emissions designators (see Table 2) will also comply with
   the emissions mask requirements shown for each frequency band.

                                                       4


Figure 1. Emission mask for the 148.250-148.585 MHz band.




Figure 2. Emission mask for the 148.635-148.750 MHz band.




                                            5


Figure 3. Emission mask for the 149.000-149.950 MHz band.

Frequency Tolerance (47 C.F.R. § 25.202(d))

       In addition, the carrier frequency of each CMES device will be maintained within 0.001%

of the reference frequency as required by Section 25.202(d) of the Commission’s rules.

Additional Technical Parameters, Operating Conditions, and Demonstration of Non-
Interference (47 C.F.R. §§ 25.135)

       As required under 47 C.F.R § 25.135, Swarm provides the following information to

demonstrate that its blanket-licensed CMES devices comply with the operating conditions set forth

in 47 C.F.R. § 25.142(b) and will not cause unacceptable interference to other authorized users of

the spectrum.

Technical Parameters

       Information regarding the power levels at which CMES devices will transmit is provided

in the accompanying Form 312 and in Table 2 above.




                                                6


        Additionally, in the 148-149.9 MHz band, the CMES devices that are the subject of this

application will operate using the following technical parameters: (1) 1% duty cycle within any

15-minute period, (2) a maximum duration of 450 ms per transmission, and (3) a minimum of 15

seconds of separation between consecutive transmissions on the same frequency. 8

        CMES devices will employ techniques to avoid transmitting on frequencies in active use

by terrestrial fixed and mobile stations. As a result, the -16 dBW/4 kHz power density limit and

0.25% duty cycle limitations provided in footnote US323 will not apply. Specifically, Swarm

CMES devices use a Carrier-Sense Multiple Access (CSMA) media access control (MAC)

protocol with Collision Avoidance (CSMA/CA). This “listen-before-talk” protocol verifies the

absence of other traffic before a transmission is initiated on a given channel. If the carrier-sensing

mechanism of a Swarm CMES device determines that another transmission is in progress, the

transmitter waits for the transmission in progress to end before initiating its own transmission.

        Using this CSMA protocol, multiple carriers on the ground, including both Swarm CMES

devices and non-Swarm devices, can operate on the same frequencies with a minimal probability

of interference to either system. There is also an inherently low probability of signal collision

because of the low duty cycle and distributed geography of the anticipated customer deployments.

Service Limitation (47 C.F.R § 25.142(b)(1))

        Pursuant to 47 C.F.R § 25.142(b)(1), Swarm will not provide voice services.

Coordination with Federal Government Users (47 C.F.R. § 25.142(b)(2))

        As explained above, Swarm CMES devices will comply with technical parameters

intended to protect federal users from NVNG MSS ground to space operations. In addition, to

ensure that Swarm does not cause unacceptable interference for federal users, Swarm will



8
    See 47 C.F.R § 2.106 at footnote US323.


                                                  7


coordinate with federal government operations through the process established by NTIA and the

Interdepartment        Radio       Advisory     Committee,       as    specifically     contemplated        by

47 C.F.R. § 25.142(b)(2). Swarm will provide any additional information requested by the

Commission required for coordination with federal users. 9

Coordination with Other NVNG MSS Systems (47 C.F.R. § 25.142(b)(3))

         Swarm does not request authority to operate in any spectrum assigned on a primary basis

to the sole NVNG MSS incumbent, ORBCOMM. As a result, upon approval of Swarm’s pending

Part 25 satellite system authorization, Swarm will be the only authorized commercial satellite

operator in the frequency bands shown in Table 1. 10 In addition, as explained above, Swarm’s

devices will comply with the applicable out-of-band emissions requirements in Section 25.202(f),

thereby protecting operations in neighboring bands. Pursuant to Section 25.142(b)(3), Swarm is

willing to coordinate its proposed frequency usage with ORBCOMM, which should be a very

straightforward process given the absence of any frequency overlap and Swarm’s compliance with

Section 25.202(f). Swarm also will work to coordinate in good faith with future NVNG MSS

operators to ensure efficient use of radio spectrum.

Grant of this Application Would Serve the Public Interest

         The grant of this application would serve the public interest by permitting end users to

access a new generation of NVNG MSS services that will be provided by Swarm’s proposed



9
     See 47 C.F.R. §25.142(b)(2)(ii).
10
     See Consolidated Opposition and Response of Swarm Technologies, Inc. at 2-10, IBFS File No. SAT-LOA-
     20181221-00094 (filed Apr. 15, 2019) (“Consolidated Opposition and Response”) (explaining that ORBCOMM
     must terminate any use of the spectrum requested by Swarm once Swarm commences operations because none
     of Swarm’s requested frequencies overlap with ORBCOMM’s primary assignments); see also Applications by
     ORBCOMM License Corp., Order and Authorization, 23 FCC Rcd. 4804, 4808, 4812-13 ¶¶ 11, 22, 23 (Int’l Bur.
     and Office of Eng’g & Tech. Mar. 21, 2008) (conditioning any use of spectrum by ORBCOMM outside of its
     primary assignments on ORBCOMM’s “operating using only frequency bands assigned to it on a primary basis .
     . . upon commencement of operations by another U.S.-licensed non-voice, non-geostationary mobile satellite
     system”).


                                                       8


satellite constellation. Swarm has designed its CMES devices to be inexpensive, energy-efficient,

and easy to deploy, making them ideally suited for remote Machine-to-Machine (“M2M”) and

Internet of Things (“IoT”) applications beyond the reach of existing cellular networks. Moreover,

as described in Swarm’s space station application and the record filed in support, considerable

demand across a diverse set of industry verticals exists for the low-cost global communications

services that Swarm proposes, and Swarm’s network will address customer needs that are unmet

by existing satellite services. 11 Twenty potential users of Swarm’s satellite services from the

automotive, agriculture, maritime, telecommunications, global development, and technology

sectors filed comments in support of Swarm’s application, 12 many of whom emphasized that

Swarm’s network promises to “open new markets that current satellite technology cannot

satisfy.” 13



11
     See Space Station Application, Narrative at 28-32; Consolidated Opposition and Response at 22-24.
12
     See Comments of Ford Smart Mobility, LLC, Application No. SAT-LOA-20181221-00094 (filed Apr. 1, 2019)
     (“Ford Comments”); Comments of Vodafone Group, Application No. SAT-LOA-20181221-00094 (filed Apr. 1,
     2019); Comments of Aclima, Application No. SAT-LOA-20181221-00094 (filed Mar. 30, 2019) ; Comments of
     Arable Labs Inc., Application No. SAT-LOA-20181221-00094 (filed Mar. 29, 2019); Comments of Arch
     Systems, Application NO. SAT-LOA-20181221-00094 (filed Mar. 29, 2019); Comments of Autonomic, LLC,
     Application No. SAT-LOA-20181221-00094 (filed Mar. 29, 2019) (“Autonomic Comments”); Comments of
     Bluetown, Application No. SAT-LOA-20181221-00094 (filed Apr. 1, 2019) (“Bluetown Comments”);
     Comments of DroneSeed, Application No. SAT-LOA-20181221-00094 (filed Mar. 31, 2019) (“DroneSeed
     Comments”); Comments of Foss Maritime Company, Application No. SAT-LOA-20181221-00094 (filed Mar.
     29, 2019); Comments of The Freshwater Trust, Application No. SAT-LOA-20181221-00094 (filed Mar. 29,
     2019); Comments of Greenridge Sciences, Application No. SAT-LOA-20181221-00094 (filed Apr. 3, 2019) ;
     Comments of Heather Mariash, Application No. SAT-LOA-20181221-00094 (filed Apr. 5, 2019); Comments of
     Hivemind, Application No. SAT-LOA-20181221-00094 (filed Mar. 29, 2019); Comments of Hopkins Marine
     Station of Stanford University, Application No. SAT-LOA-20181221-00094 (filed Apr. 1, 2019) (“Stanford Univ.
     Comments”); Comments of Lower Yukon School District, Application No. SAT-LOA-20181221-00094 (filed
     Apr. 1, 2019); Comments of Social Capital, Application No. SAT-LOA-20181221-00094 (filed Mar. 29, 2019)
     (“Social Capital Comments”); Comments of Sofar Ocean Technologies, Application No. SAT-LOA-20181221-
     00094 (filed Apr. 1, 2019); Comments of SweetSense, Application No. SAT-LOA-20181221-00094 (filed Mar.
     29, 2019); Comments of Tule Technologies Inc., Application No. SAT-LOA-20181221-00094 (filed Apr. 2,
     2019); Comments of the University of Houston, Application No. SAT-LOA-20181221-00094 (filed Mar. 29,
     2019).
13
     Ford Comments at 2; see also Social Capital Comments at 1 (describing Swarm’s network as a “fundamentally
     enabling technology” capable of addressing “applications from water accessibility and food safety, to
     environmental monitoring and intelligent energy systems”); Autonomic Comments at 2; DroneSeed Comments
     at 1; Stanford Univ. Comments at 1; Bluetown Comments at 1.


                                                        9


       Authorization of Swarm’s network also will help to ensure that U.S. companies lead the

way in a new era of innovation enabled by small satellite technology. Swarm is prepared to deploy

its satellite constellation upon approval of its pending space station authorization, and to begin

offering services to commercial users shortly thereafter. Approval of the blanket earth station

application will enable significant numbers of new satellite users to benefit from Swarm’s low-

cost satellite technology and bring IoT connectivity to new verticals and rural communities. For

these reasons, expeditious grant of this application would serve the public interest and ensure that

services can be provided to end users without delay.



                              Respectfully submitted,

                              Swarm Technologies, Inc.

                              By:    _/s/ Sophie Arlow______
                              Dr. Sophie Arlow
                              Lead Program Manager

                              Dr. Sara Spangelo
                              Chief Executive Officer

                              Kalpak Gude
                              General Counsel

                              Swarm Technologies Inc.
                              845 Madonna Way
                              Los Altos, CA 94024




                                                10



Document Created: 2019-06-14 09:49:22
Document Modified: 2019-06-14 09:49:22

© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC