Attachment Attachment 1 - NIR

This document pretains to SES-LIC-20151216-00945 for License on a Satellite Earth Station filing.

IBFS_SESLIC2015121600945_1118720

Radiation Hazard Report Page 1 of 5 Analysis of Non—lonizing Radiation for a 1.415 Meter Earth Station System This report analyzes the non—ionizing radiation levels for an Avi Technologies 1410K 1.415 meter Ku band earth station system.The analysis and calculations performed in this report comply with the methods described in the FCC Office of Engineering and Technology Bulletin, No. 65 first published in 1985 and revised in 1997in Edition 97—01. The radiation safety limits used in the analysis are in conformance with the FCC R&O 96—328. Bulletin No. 65 and the FCC R&O specifies that there are two separate tiers of exposure limits that are dependent on the situation in which the exposure takes place and/or the status of the individuals who aresubject to the exposure. The Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) limits for persons in a General Population/Uncontrolled environment are shown in Table 1. The General Population/Uncontrolled MPE is a function of transmit frequency and is for an exposure period ofthirty minutes or less. The MPE limits for persons in an Occupational/Controlled environment are shown in Table 2. The Occupational MPE is a function of transmit frequency and is for an exposure period of six minutes or less. The purpose of the analysis described in this report is to determine the power flux density levels of the earth station in the far—field, near—field, transition region, between the subreflector or feed and main reflector surface, at the main reflector surface, and between the antenna edge and the ground and to compare these levels to the specified MPEs. Table 1. Limits for General Population/Uncontrolled Exposure (MPE) Frequency Range (MHz) Power Density (mW/cm2) 30—300 0.2 300—1500 Frequency (MHz)®(0.8/1200) 1500—100,000 1.0 Table 2. Limits for General Population/Controlled Exposure (MPE) Frequency Range (MHz) Power Density (mW/cm2) 30—300 1.0 300—1500 Frequency (MHz)*(4.0/1200) 1500—100,000 5.0 Table 3. Formulas and Parameters Used for Determining Power Flux Densities |Parameter Symbol Formula Value Units |Antenna Diameter D 1415 m |Antenna Surface Diameter Asurface (TYDZ)M 1.572543838 m2 Feed Flange Diameter Dfa M 7.3025 om lArea of Feed Flange Afa (mDfa‘)4 41.88254007 cm2 Frequency F 14.25 GHz |Wavelength A 300 /F 0.021052632 m [Transmit Power P 125 W |Antenna Gain (dbi) Ges 44.5 dBi |Antenna Gain (factor) 6 1g* 28183.82031 Pi T 3.141592654 |Antenna Efficiency 7 0.632117952

Radiation Hazard Report Page 2 of 5 1. Far Field Distance Calculation The distance to the beginning of thefar field can be determined from the following equation: (1) Distance to the Far Field Region Rif = 0.60D2/ = 57.0634125 m The maximum main beam power density in the far field can be determined from the following equation: (2) Distance to the Far Field Region Sif = GP/(4n Rffz) = s6.09633509 Wim* = s.eoo634 mWicm" 2. Near Field Calculation Power flux density is considered to be at a maximum value throughout the entire length of the defined Near Field region. The region is contained within a cylindrical volume having the same diameter as the antenna. Past the boundary of the Near Field region, the power density from the antenna decreases linearly with respect to increasing distance. The distance to the end of the Near Field can be determined from the following equation: (3) Extent of the Near Field Rnf D/ (4 A) 23.77642188 m ‘he maximum power density in the Near Field can be determined from the following equatior (4) Near Field Power Density Snf = 16.07P/ (nDz) = 200.9857967 Wim* = 20.09858 mW/cm* 3. Transition Region Calculation The Transition region is located between the Near and Far Field regions. The powerdensity begins to decrease linearly with increasing distance in the Transition region. While the power density decreases inversely with distancein the Transition region, the power density decreases inversely with the square of the distancein the Far Field region. The maximum power density in the Transition region will not exceed that calculated for the NearField region. The power density calculated in Section 2 is the highest powerdensity the antenna can produce in any of the regions away from the antenna. The power density at a distance Rt can be determined from the following equation: (® Near Field Power Density St Snf Rnf / Rt s 20.09857987 mW/cm*

Radiation Hazard Report Page 3 of 5 4. Distance to Safe Region Calculation Since the power density decreases inversely with the square of the distance in the Far Field region, the distance to the On—axis Power Density of 5 mW/cm2 can be determined from the following equation: (6) Distance to ANSI 5 mW/om* Dsafe = RHf (St5)*) 74.8799 meters 5. Region between the Feed Assembly and the Antenna Reflector Transmissions from the feed assembly aredirected toward the antenna reflector surface, and are confined within a conical shape defined by thetype of feed assembly. The most common feed assemblies are waveguide flanges, horns or subreflectors. The energy between the feed assembly and reflector surface can be calculated by determining the powerdensity at the feed assembly surface. This can be determined from the following equation: ) Power Density at the Feed Flange Sfa 4000 P /Afa 11938.1489 mWiem* 6. Main Reflector Region The power density in the main reflector is determined in the same manneras the power density at the feed assembly. The area is now the area of the reflector aperture and can be determined from the following equation: 6 Power Density at the Reflector Surface Ssurface = 4 P /Asurface = 317.95616 W/im" 31.7956 mW/cm? 7. Off—axis Evaluation For off—axis calculations in the Near Field and in the Transition region, it can be assumed that, if the point of interest is at least one antenna diameter removed from the center of the main beam, the powerdensity at that point would be at least a factorof 100 (20dB) less than the value calculated for the equivalent distance in the main beam. For off—axis calculations in the Far Field, the calculated main—beam power density can be multiplied by the appropriate relative power density factorobtained from the antennagain pattern. Since the proposed antenna meets or exceeds the performance specifications under Part 25.209 of the FCC rules, the off—axis gain for this antenna is equal to or greater than 10dBi less than the on—axis gain in any direction of 48 degrees or more removed from the centerline of the main beam. The distance to the end of the Near Field can be determined from the following equation: (9) Near Field Off—axis Power Density Snrom = 0.01 Snf = 02010 mW/cm® Far Field Off—axis Power Density S"(m = .1 Sf (10) 0.8610 mWicm

Radiation Hazard Report Page 4 of 5 8. Summary of Calculations Table 4. Summary of Expected Radiation levels for Uncontrolled Environment Calculated Maximum Radiation Power Region Density Level (mW/cm‘) Hazard Assessment Far Field (Rif = 57.0634125 m) Sft 86096 Potential Hazard Near Field (Rnf = 23.776421875 m) Snf 20.0986 Potential Hazard Transition Region (Rnf < Rt< Rf) St 20.0986 Potential Hazard Safe Distance Region (Dsafe = 74.8798683756659 meters) Dsafe 74.8799 Potential Hazard Between Feed Assembly and Antenna Reflector Sfa 11938.1489 Potential Hazard Main Reflector Surface Srige 31.7956 Potential Hazard Far Field Off—axis Region Sffon 0.8610 Potential Hazard Near Field Off—axis Region (Between Reflector and ground) Stfen 0,2010 Potential Hazard Table 5. Summary of Expected Radiation levels for Controlled Environment Calculated Maximum Radiation Power Region Density Level (mWicm?) Hazard Assessment Far Field (Rif = 57.0634125 m) Sff 8.60986 Potential Hazard Near Field (Rnf = 23.776421875 m) Snf 20.0986 Potential Hazard Transition Region (Rnf < Rt< RfM) St 20.0986 Potential Hazard Safe Distance Region (Dsafe = 74.8798683756659 meters) Dsafe 74.8799 Potential Hazard Between Feed Assembly and Antenna Sfa 11938.1489 Potential Hazard Main Reflector Surface Suitce 31.7956 Potential Hazard Far Field Off—axis Region Sffon 0.8610 Potential Hazard Near Field Off—axis Region (Between Reflector and ground) Shfen 0.2010 Potential Hazard it is the applicant‘s responsibility to ensure that the public and operational personnel are not exposed to harmful levels of radiation.

Radiation Hazard Report Page 5 of 5 8. Summary of Calculations Based on this analysis it is concluded that the FCC RF Guidelines have been exceeded in the specific regions of Tables 4 and 5. The applicant proposes to comply with the Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) limits of 1 mW/cm2 for the Uncontrolled areas and the MPE limits of 5 mW/cm2 for the Controlled areas by one or more of the following methods: Means of Compliance — Uncontrolled Areas This antenna will be located on a vehicle rooftop. The distance from the ground to the center of the antenna is approximately 4.1 meters. The location will be sufficient to prohibit access to the areas that exceed the MPE limits. The general public will not have access to areas within %4 diameter removed from the edge of the antenna. Radiation hazard signswill be posted at any rooftop access location. The signs will be completely visible from the ground. The applicant will ensure that no buildings or other obstacles will be in the areas that exceed the MPE levels. Means of Compliance — Controlled Areas The earth station‘s operational personnel will not have access to the areas that exceed the MPE levels while the earth station is in operation. The transmitters will be turned off during antenna maintenance. Means of Compliance — Safety in General This antenna system is located on a mobile unit and conditions will vary from operating site to operating site. Becauseof this, the licensee will establish procedures for the operational personnel to verify that the antenna is not pointing in the direction of populated areas, and that access to hazardous areas are restricted while the unit is in operation. in addition, the transmit power used in these calculations is greater than that which will typically be utilized by the earth station. During normal operation, the typical power level would generally not exceed more than 50 to 75 percent of the indicated transmitter power. Maximum transmit power would generally only occur in conditions of extreme inclement weather.


Document Created: 2019-04-14 05:30:22
Document Modified: 2019-04-14 05:30:22
© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC