Attachment Attachment 1

This document pretains to SES-LIC-20150604-00342 for License on a Satellite Earth Station filing.

IBFS_SESLIC2015060400342_1089206

                                           ATTACHMENT 1

                APPLICATION FOR GATEWAY EARTH STATION LICENSES

          Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 25.115, HNS License Sub, LLC (together with its affiliates,

“Hughes”) seeks authority to operate a total of 17 gateway earth stations that will communicate

with the Jupiter 97W satellite system. The proposed gateway earth stations will be located

primarily in the Western and Midwestern United States, and will consist of seven 8.1 meter earth

station antennas, seven 5.6 meter earth station antennas, two 9.2 meter antennas, and one 13.2

meter earth station antenna.1

          Background. On July 27, 2012, the FCC authorized Hughes to access the U.S. market by

using Jupiter 97W, a satellite that will operate in the Ka-band and provide broadband services to

U.S. consumers across the country.2 On December 10, 2014, Hughes filed an application (which

remains pending) to modify its authorization, including adding the 27.85-28.35 GHz frequencies

(gateway uplink) and updating the FCC licensing information associated with the satellite to

reflect that it will be operated by Hughes under the International Telecommunications Union

(“ITU”) filing for the RAGGIANA-5 network, registered at the ITU by Papua New Guinea. 3

          Public Interest Benefits. Grant of this application is in the public interest as it will allow

Hughes to deploy the gateway earth stations required for the Jupiter 97W satellite, which is

scheduled to be launched in 2016 and will provide advanced broadband services to U.S.

consumers. Specifically, the Jupiter 97W satellite will offer significant additional capacity to the

Hughes satellite fleet to meet the broadband needs of business and residential users in North


1
 Additional network gateway earth stations will also operate in Mexico and Canada, pursuant to
appropriate regulatory authorizations in those countries.
2
    See Hughes, Letter of Intent, IBFS File No. SAT-LOI-20110809-00148 (granted Jul. 27, 2012).
3
    See IBFS File No. SAT-MOD-20141210-00127 (filed Dec. 10, 2014).

                                                     1


America, delivering such high demand services as HD video programming, on-demand

entertainment, digital music, interactive television, video conferencing, and high capacity two-

way communications.

       Proposed Antennas. The proposed gateway earth stations are scheduled to be

deployed in the 2015-2016 timeframe at the locations specified in Table 1 below. They

will consist of seven 8.1 meter earth station antennas, seven 5.6 meter earth station

antennas, two 9.2 meter antennas, and one 13.2 meter earth station antenna. The

technical data for each of these antennas is provided in the accompanying Form 312,

Schedule B.

       The proposed gateway earth stations will meet the antenna performance mask specified in

Section 25.209(a) of the Commission’s rules. The off-axis EIRP density levels specified in

Section 25.138(a) are met with the antenna types that Hughes is proposing to use.




                                                 2


     Table 1:          Gateway Earth Station Sites

                                                                                  Antenna
                                         Site Contact Information
                                                                                  Diameter        Longitude                  Latitude
            Sites                                                                 (meters) Degree Minutes Seconds   Degree   Minutes Seconds
                                 725 6th Street, NW, Albuquerque, NM 87102
1     Albuquerque, NM                                                               8.1     106     39      10.8      35       5      32.28
                                                 301−428−7205
                                    512 SE 8th Avenue, Amarillo, TX 79101
2       Amarillo, TX                                                                8.1     101     49      55.2      35       12     16.56
                                                 301−428−7205
                                   1030 Central Avenue, Billings, MT 59102
3       Billings, MT                                                                5.6     108     32      27.6      45       46      6.96
                                                 301−428−7205
                                  4202 Coleman Street, Bismarck, ND 58501
4       Bismark, ND                                                                 8.1     100     46     48.72      46       51      5.76
                                                 301−428−7205
                                   10215 W. Emerald Street, Boise, ID 83704
5         Boise, ID                                                                 5.6     116     18      36        43       36     27.72
                                                 301−428−7205
                                   530 Echostar Drive, Cheyenne, WY 82007
6      Cheyenne, WY                                                                 9.2     104     44      9.6       41       7       55.2
                                                 301−428−7205
                                  8404 El Way, Suite 1, Missoula, MT 59808
7       Missoula, MT                                                                5.6     114      7      1.2       46       56      9.96
                                                 301−428−7205
                                  1 Aerojet Way, North Las Vegas, NV 89030
8    North Las Vegas, NV                                                            5.6     115      7      2.64      36       14     11.04
                                                 301−428−7205
                              1003 East State Farm Road, North Platte, NE 69103
9      North Platte, NE                                                             8.1     100     45      10.8      41       5      26.88
                                                 301−428−7205
                               9394 West Dodge Road #100, Omaha, NE 68114
10       Omaha, NE                                                                  13.2    96       3     32.76      41       15     51.48
                                                 301−428−7205
                                 2050 Martin Avenue, Santa Clara, CA 95050
11      San Jose, CA                                                                5.6     121     57      39.6      37       21     54.72
                                                 301−428−7205
                                        333 S 520 W, Lindon, UT 84042
12    Salt Lake City, UT                                                            5.6     111     43      40.8      40       19      57
                                                 301−428−7205
                                    801 North Dish Drive, Gilbert, AZ 85233
13       Gilbert, AZ                                                                9.2     111     48      50.4      33       21      55.8
                                                 301−428−7205
                                       12101 Tukwila International Blvd,
14       Seattle, WA                          Tukwila, WA 98168                     8.1     122     17      42        47       29      33
                                                 301−428−7205



                                                                           3


                                                                   Antenna
                              Site Contact Information
                                                                   Diameter        Longitude                  Latitude
         Sites                                                     (meters) Degree Minutes Seconds   Degree   Minutes Seconds
                      455 SE Spruce St., Roseburg, Oregon 97470
15   Roseburg, OR                                                    8.1     123     20     49.56      43       12     40.32
                                    301−428−7205
                     12270 World Trade Drive #100, San Diego, CA
16   San Diego, CA                                                   5.6     117      4      24.6      32       59     19.68
                                    301−428−7205
                       3401 Technology Drive, Duluth, MN 55811
17    Duluth, MN                                                     8.1     92       7      49.8      46       49      33.6
                                    301−428−7205




                                                              4


         Operating Frequencies. The proposed earth stations will be operated as gateways in

communication with the Jupiter 97W satellite network,4 and each gateway will operate in the

following frequency bands:


                                     Table 2 - Gateway Beams

    Frequency Band                                                         US Allocation
                                     Function
         (GHz)
     27.85-28.35                  Gateway Uplink                           LMDS Primary
      28.35-28.6                  Gateway Uplink                          FSS GSO Primary
      28.6-29.1                   Gateway Uplink                         NGSO FSS Primary

      29.25-30.0                  Gateway Uplink                          FSS GSO Primary

      18.3-18.8                 Gateway Downlink                          FSS GSO Primary
      18.8-19.3                 Gateway Downlink                         NGSO FSS Primary

      19.7-20.2                 Gateway Downlink                          FSS GSO Primary



         As noted in Table 2 above, the proposed gateway uplink frequencies include the 27.85-

28.35 GHz band,5 which is allocated to local multipoint distribution service (“LMDS”) on a

primary basis and to fixed satellite service on a secondary basis. The attached Comsearch

coordination report (Exhibit A) shows that the proposed gateway earth stations, which will be

deployed in 2015 and 2016, will be capable of operating in the 27.85-28.35 GHz band on a non-

harmful interference basis with existing and future LMDS systems. Comsearch completed


4
 The FCC added the Jupiter 97W satellite to the Ka-band Permitted List at the 97.1 W.L. orbital location
for the 28.35-28.6 GHz and 29.25-30.0 GHz frequency bands (Earth-to-space), and the 18.3-18.8 GHz and
19.7-20.2 GHz frequency bands (space-to-Earth). See Stamp Grant, SAT-LOI-20110809-00148 ¶ 10
(granted Jul. 27, 2012).
5
 See also IBFS File No. SAT-MOD-20141210-00127 (filed Dec. 10, 2014) (seeking authority to add
27.85-28.35 GHz band to authorization for Jupiter 97W).

                                                   5


frequency coordination notice for all of the proposed locations in Table 1. Prior notification

letters were sent to incumbent 28 GHz licensees, and no objections were received. Therefore,

there are no interference concerns regarding the proposed use of the 27.85-28.35 GHz frequency

band.

           Waiver Request. As detailed in the attached Exhibit B (Waiver Request), Hughes

requests a partial waiver of the data submission requirements of Sections 25.115(e) and

25.138(d)-(e) in order to allow for submission of measured data for each of the proposed antenna

types.

           FAA Notification. The proposed 5.6 meter antennas are exempt from notification to the

FAA under 47 C.F.R. §17.7(e)(3) as they will be less than 6.1 meters in height above ground

level. 6

           For all other proposed gateway antennas (i.e., with a diameter of 8.1 meters or greater),

the FCC TOWAIR software application was used to verify compliance with the limits specified

in 47 C.F.R. § 17.7(b). All gateway stations, except the one in Seattle, passed this verification.7

           The Seattle gateway will be located approximately 4000 meters from the Boeing factory

airfield and will exceed the slope requirement in 47 CFR § 17.7(b). This antenna will consist of

an 8.1 meter parabolic antenna that will have a maximum height of no more than 8.3 meters

above ground level. However, the Seattle gateway antenna will be located on the side of a hill,

with a building located immediately beside the antenna. This building has a maximum height of

25 meters and is between the antenna and active runway. Given the shielding of the antenna by a




6
 See also 47 C.F.R. § 25.113(c) (exemption from FAA notification when antenna height is less than 6.1
meters above ground).
7
    See Exhibit C (TOWAIR Verification).

                                                    6


larger, permanent structure, FAA notification of the Seattle gateway location is not required.8

Photo 1 provided below shows both the antenna location (red) and the end of the active runway

(yellow). Photo 2 provides additional resolution at the antenna location, showing a hill on the

left and a building taller than the antenna on the right.




             Photo 1

      (altitude 1400 meters)




8
    See 47 CFR § 17.7(e)(1)

                                                  7


           Photo 2

    (altitude 145 meters)




       Radiation Hazard Analyses. For the four proposed antenna types, radiation hazard

analyses were conducted using the predictive methodology identified in OET Bulletin 65. The

results are provided in Exhibits D1 to D4 (RADHAZ Calculations).

       The analyses were based on the maximum RF power at the antenna flange of 125 Watts

for the 5.6 meter antenna and 200 Watts for the 8.1, 9.2, and 13.2 meter antennas. This is the

maximum uplink power control power, which will only be used for very short periods of time

during rain. During clear-sky operations, RF levels will be significantly lower.

       Exhibits D1 to D4 show that the average exposure levels for the protection of the general

public are met in the near field, transition field, far field, and between the reflector and ground.

As is typically the case with parabolic antennas, the average exposure level for the protection of

the general public is exceeded between the feed horn and the reflector. However, since these

large antennas will be mounted on a pedestal, the volume of space between the feed horn and


                                                  8


reflector where the limit is exceeded will always be above the head of anyone standing in front of

the antenna. To further ensure the protection of the general public, the antenna will be located

either behind a fence or on private commercial property with limited access. Technicians

responsible for operating these antennas are trained to shut down and secure the transmitter

before performing any maintenance work.

       NGSO Feederlink Coordination. The 29.25-29.50 GHz band, which will be used by the

proposed antennas, is shared on a co-primary basis with the feeder link stations of MSS NGSO

systems under 47 C.F.R. § 25.258. Hughes and Iridium, the only NGSO licensee in this band,

have concluded a coordination agreement that will ensure the protection of Iridium’s operations.

       Conclusion. Based upon the foregoing, Hughes requests that the Commission grant this

application to operate the proposed gateway earth stations. As demonstrated herein, grant of this

application is in the public interest, and the proposed operations will not cause any harmful

interference.

                                             Respectfully Submitted,

                                             /s/ Jennifer A. Manner
                                             Jennifer A. Manner
                                             Vice President, Regulatory Affairs
                                             HNS License Sub, LLC
                                             11717 Exploration Lane
                                             Germantown, MD 20876
                                             (301) 428-5506




                                                 9



Document Created: 2015-05-28 14:17:46
Document Modified: 2015-05-28 14:17:46

© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC