Attachment 25.138(b) Analysis

This document pretains to SES-LIC-20140617-00524 for License on a Satellite Earth Station filing.

IBFS_SESLIC2014061700524_1050499

                              SECTION 25.138(B) ANALYSIS

        In this application, DIRECTV Enterprises, LLC (“DIRECTV”) seeks to add an
additional Ka-band TT&C antenna to its existing ground infrastructure. The technical
parameters requested in the application are such that this antenna could be used to
communicate with any of DIRECTV’s existing Ka-band satellites. In some cases, due to
the power level required for, and the relatively narrowband nature of, TT&C emissions,
the off-axis EIRP density levels set forth in Section 25.138(a)(1) of the Commission’s
rules will not be met. Analyses are included below to address each of these cases

      Section 25.138 (a) provides that an application for a blanket Ka-band earth station
license will be routinely processed if it meets the following requirements:

     GSO FSS earth station antenna off-axis EIRP spectral density for co-polarized
     signals shall not exceed the following values, within 3° of the GSO arc, under
     clear sky conditions:

     18.5-25log(theta)-10log(N) dBW/40kHz........... for 2.0° <= theta <= 7°
     -2.63-10log(N).............. dBW/40kHz........... for 7° <= theta <= 9.23°
     21.5-25log(theta)-10log(N) dBW/40kHz........... for 9.23° <= theta <= 48°
     -10.5-10log(N).............. dBW/40kHz........... for 48° <= theta <= 180°

     Where:
     theta is the angle in degrees from the axis of the main lobe; for systems where
     more than one earth station is expected to transmit simultaneously in the same
     bandwidth, e.g., CDMA systems, N is the likely maximum number of
     simultaneously transmitting co-frequency earth stations in the receive beam of
     the satellite; N=1 for TDMA and FDMA systems.

This portion of Section 25.138 is clearly intended to ensure that the level of off-axis EIRP
from the applicant’s earth station meets an agreed-upon level and thereby does not cause
excessive interference to neighboring satellites spaced at 2° increments from the
applicant’s satellite. For TDMA and FDMA systems, it can readily be shown that for an
antenna that just meets the performance requirements of Section 25.209, an input power
density of less than -10.6 dBW/40 kHz into the antenna will result in compliance with
Section 25.138(a). For antennas with performance that exceeds the requirements of
Section 25.209 (i.e., with better off-axis gain performance), this value of input power
density can be increased dB-for-dB relative to the improved off-axis performance.

        Section 25.138(b) of the Commission’s rules requires that Ka-band applicants
proposing to operate earth stations with off-axis EIRP in excess of the values in Section
25.138(a)(1) submit link budget analyses of the operations proposed, along with a
detailed explanation of how each uplink carrier density figure is derived. It further
requires applicants to submit a narrative summary indicating whether there are margin
shortfalls in any of the current baseline services as a result of the addition of the

                                             1


applicant’s higher power service and, if so, how the applicant intends to resolve those
shortfalls. Finally, this section requires that applicants certify that all potentially affected
parties (i.e., GSO FSS satellite networks that are within 2, 4, and 6 degrees) acknowledge
and do not object to the use of the applicant’s higher power densities.

        The specific frequencies for the telecommand and beacon signals for DIRECTV’s
Ka-band satellites are indicated in the table below. Also indicated in this table are the
emission designators and the applied-for maximum clear sky and faded transmit power
levels. Separate analyses follow below for the various different emission designator
cases.

      Set     Designator   Function            Freq                   EIRP levels (dBW)
                                              (MHz)
              1M30F9D       CMD       29501.302, 29509.1146     50 (clear sky), 89.5 (max faded)
                                      29503.9063, 29511.7188
       1      25K0N0N        BCN      29527.34, 29532.55        50 (clear sky), 75.8 (max faded)
                                      29527.34, 29532.55

              1M30F9D      CMD(pri)     29251, 29253, 29255     76 (clear sky), 91 (max faded)
       2                    CMD         29493, 29495, 29497
               160KF3N      BCN         29251, 29253, 29255     76 (clear sky), 91 (max faded)

       3       800KF2D      CMD            28351, 28353         76 (clear sky), 91 (max faded)
 Table 1. Ka-band Telecommand and Beacon Frequencies for DIRECTV Satellites

        For the first set of emission designators in Table 1, there are two different
emission designators to consider, both of which have a maximum clear sky EIRP of 50
dBW. After subtracting the main beam antenna gain of 66.5 dBi, the maximum clear sky
power into the antenna for these carrier is -16.5 dBW, which is compliant with Section
25.138 even without scaling for bandwidth. Section 25.138(a)(5) allows the maximum
power density into the antenna under faded conditions to be up to 20 dB greater than that
for clear sky, or 9.4 dBW/40 kHz. After subtracting the main beam antenna gain of 66.5
dBi and scaling for bandwidth by subtracting 10*log(carrier bandwidth/40 kHz) dB for
each carrier type, the maximum power density into the antenna for faded conditions is 7.9
dBW/40 kHz and 9.3 dBW/40 kHz, for the 1.3 MHz and 25 kHz emission designators,
respectively. As such, both of these emissions are compliant with Section 25.138 under
max faded conditions.

        For the second set of emission designators in Table 1, there are primary and
secondary telecommand frequencies and there is a pointing beacon that is only
transmitted on the primary command frequency. The link budget set forth in Table 2
below details the clear sky transmit power from the earth station that will be
communicating with the satellites that use these emission designators, and immediately
below that link budget is an analysis of off-axis EIRP density relative to the values called
for in Section 25.138(a)(1). Note that the power density per 40 kHz for each carrier was
calculated by subtracting 10*log(carrier bandwidth/40 kHz) dB for each carrier type.
Also note that a 6 dB allowance was included due to the fact that the applied-for antenna
performance is fully expected to have off-axis gain performance at least 6 dB better than

                                               2


the requirements of Section 25.209. As these higher power density carriers are part of the
TT&C system for these satellites, there is no impact to other communications carriers or
baseline services and no resultant shortfall in any other carrier performance margins.

                                                                                         Command     Beacon
     Satellite Control Facility TX EIRP (dBW)                                                 76         76
     Free Space Loss (dB)                                                                  213.31     213.31
     Gaseous Atten (dB)                                                                      0.37       0.37
     Rcvd Isotropic Power (RIP) @ Spacecraft (dBW)                                        -137.68    -137.68
     Required RIP (dBW)                                                                   -148.85    -147.85
     Margin (dB)                                                                            11.17      10.17
     Section 25.138 Analysis
     Max Satellite Control Facility EIRP (dBW)                                                 76       76
     Satellite Control Facility (SCF) Tx Gain (dBi)                                           66.5     66.5
     Max carrier power into SCF antenna (dBW)                                                  9.5      9.5
     Carrier Bandwidth (kHz)                                                                 1300      160
     Max power density into antenna (dBW/40 kHz)                                              -5.6      3.5
     Max power density for §25.138 compliance (dBW/40 kHz)1                                  -10.6    -10.6
     Antenna off-axis performance relative to Section 25.209                                   -6       -6
     Excess pwr relative to Section 25.138(a)                                                  -1       8.1
    1.   This max power density is for an antenna just meeting the requirements of Section 25.209.
           Table 2. Clear Sky Link Budget and Section 25.138 Analysis of
          Telecommand and Beacon System For Set 2 Emission Designators

From these results it can be seen that the clear sky command carrier is compliant with
Section 25.138(a), but that the pointing beacon exceeds allowable levels by 8.1 dB.
Faded results would be the same as the transmit power would increase dB-for-dB with
the amount of fade and the maximum faded EIRP is only 15 dB greater than the
maximum clear sky EIRP and less than the 20 dB allowable under Section 25.138(a)(5).

        For the third set of emission designators in Table 1, a very similar analysis was
performed. The link budget set forth in Table 3 below details the clear sky transmit
power from the earth station that will be communicating with the satellites that use this
emission designator, and immediately below that link budget is an analysis of off-axis
EIRP density relative to the values called for in Section 25.138(a)(1). Note that the
power density per 40 kHz for each carrier was calculated by subtracting 10*log(carrier
bandwidth/40 kHz) dB for each carrier type and that a 6 dB allowance was included due
to the fact that the applied-for antenna performance is fully expected to have off-axis gain
performance at least 6 dB better than the requirements of Section 25.209. As these
higher power density carriers are part of the TT&C system for these three satellites, there
is no impact to other communications carriers or baseline services and no resultant
shortfall in any other carrier performance margins. As Table 3 shows, the clear sky
command carrier exceeds the levels of Section 25.138(a) by 1.1 dB.




                                                             3


                                                                                              Command
         Satellite Control Facility TX EIRP (dBW)                                                  76
         Free Space Loss (dB)                                                                   213.31
         Gaseous Atten (dB)                                                                       0.37
         Rcvd Isotropic Power (RIP) @ Spacecraft (dBW)                                         -137.68
         Required RIP (dBW)                                                                     -151.2
         Margin (dB)                                                                             13.52
         Section 25.138 Analysis
         Max Satellite Control Facility EIRP (dBW)                                                  76
         Satellite Control Facility (SCF) Tx Gain (dBi)                                            66.5
         Max carrier power into SCF antenna (dBW)                                                   9.5
         Carrier Bandwidth (kHz)                                                                   800
         Max power density into antenna (dBW/40 kHz)                                               -3.5
         Max power density for §25.138 compliance (dBW/40 kHz)1                                   -10.6
         Antenna off-axis performance relative to Section 25.209                                    -6
         Excess pwr relative to Section 25.138(a)                                                   1.1
         1.   This max power density is for an antenna just meeting the requirements of Section 25.209.
              Table 3. Clear Sky Link Budget and Section 25.138 Analysis of
                 Telecommand System for Set 3 Emission Designators

DIRECTV has analyzed the potential impact of these Ka-band TT&C emissions on other
potentially affected GSO FSS networks within 6º of DIRECTV’s Ka-band satellites.
Within 6⁰ to the east of 99⁰ W.L., SPACEWAY 3 is operating nominally at 95⁰ W.L. and
Jupiter 97W is authorized to operate nominally at 97⁰ W.L. 1 Within 6⁰ to the west of
103⁰ W.L., AMC-15 is operating nominally at 105⁰ W.L. and Echo 17 is operating
nominally at 107⁰ W.L. No entity is currently authorized to operate Ka-band at the
nominal 109⁰ W.L. location.

Figure 1 below was produced as a result of reviewing the current authorizations for each
of the potentially affected satellites mentioned in the paragraph above. As can be seen,
there is no frequency overlap of DIRECTV’s Ka-band TT&C with either SPACEWAY 3
at the nominal 95⁰ W.L. location or AMC-15 at the nominal 105⁰ W.L. location, and
these satellites therefore cannot be affected. The only remaining satellites are Jupiter
97W and Echo 17, both of which are operated by EchoStar. DIRECTV confirms that it
has discussed this issue with EchoStar and that EchoStar has not objected to these higher
power telecommand and pointing beacon operations.




1
    Note that ICO-G is operating at 92.85⁰ W.L., which is more than 6⁰ away from DIRECTV’s Ka-band
    satellites at the nominal 99⁰ W.L. location.

                                                             4


                                   cmo/ecy          cmo




—f:                     i— zo       —fk               4)                                +
28.35                  28.6        29.25              29.5                             30.0




 +                       i—   /4     t

                                          spaceway 3 (6EWw)
28.35                  28.6        29.25              29.5                             30.0




_l                            se                          r
28.35                  28.         ZB.ZSJUPITER 97W29.5                                30.0




                              s      —
        28.4           28.6        29.25AMC_15 (105\&7)5                               30.0




                              w
                                           EcHo 17 (10AW)
28.3                   28.6        29.25                                               30.0



       Figure 1. Relation of DIRECTV TT&C signals to Potentially Affected Satellites



Document Created: 2019-04-19 14:08:56
Document Modified: 2019-04-19 14:08:56

© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC