Attachment 20120302111558.pdf

20120302111558.pdf

DECISION submitted by IB-FCC

Dismissal ltr

2012-03-02

This document pretains to SES-LIC-20120113-00055 for License on a Satellite Earth Station filing.

IBFS_SESLIC2012011300055_941485

Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 DA 12—331 March 2 , 2012 SES Americom Inc. Attention: Joseph Massey SES Engineering 11 Edsall Drive Sussex, NJ 07461 Re: Call Sign E120016 IBFS File No. SES—LIC—20120113—00055 Dear Mr. Massey: On January 13, 2012, SES Americom Inc. (SES) filed the above—captioned application for an earth station license. For the reason stated below, we dismiss the application as defective. Section 25.112(a) of the Commission‘s rules, 47 C.F.R. § 25.112(a), requires the Commission to return as unacceptable for filing any earth station application that is not substantially complete, contains internal inconsistencies, or does not substantially comply with the Commission‘s rules. SES‘s application has the following deficiency, which renders the application unacceptable and subject to dismissal: SES did not provide a response to Item E21 of Schedule B, which requires applicants to list the proposed points of communication. See 47 C.F.R. § 25.130 (a)(1). Accordingly, pursuant to Section 25.112(a)(1) of the Commission‘s rules, 47 C.F.R. §25.112(a)(1), and Section 0.261 of the Commission‘s rules, 47 C.F.R. §0.261, we dismiss the application without prejudice to re—filing.‘ Sir?ly, _ Paul Blais Chief, Systems Analysis Branch Satellite Division International Bureau ‘ If SES Americom Inc. refiles an application identical to the one dismissed, with the exception of the corrected information, it need not pay an additional application fee. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1111(d).


Document Created: 2019-05-29 05:34:43
Document Modified: 2019-05-29 05:34:43
© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC