Attachment Completion of Constr

Completion of Constr

LETTER submitted by Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP

Completion of Constr

2007-12-13

This document pretains to SES-LIC-20070703-00885 for License on a Satellite Earth Station filing.

IBFS_SESLIC2007070300885_611159

ORIGINAL Skappen, Arps, Scate, MeaogomerR & F.om LLP 1440 NEW YORK AVENUE, N.W. FIRM/AFFILIATE OFFICES WASHINGTON, D.C. 20005—2111 BOSTON CHICAGO HOUSTON TEL: (202) 371 —7000 LOS ANGELES DiRECT Diat. FAX: (202) 393—5760 www.skadden.com RECEIVED NEW YORK PALO ALTO SAN FRANCISCO WI LMINGTON DEC 1 8 2007 (202) 37 1—7574 DIRECT FAX BEIJING B RUSSELS (202) 661—9074 FRANKFURT EMaAIL ADpRESS HONG KONG JSHER@SKADDEN.COM Satellite Division LONDON MOscow International Bureau MUNICH PARIS SINGAPORE SsYDNEY December 13, 2007 TOKYO TORONTO VIENNA FILED/ACCEPTED Marlene Dortch DEC 1 a 2007 Secretary Fedaral Cammunications Commission Federal Communications Commission Office of the Secretary 445 12th Street, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 RE:— Certification of Completion of Construction E—070130, Montgomery, Texas (Woodlands #1) File No. SES—LIC—20070703—00884 E—070131, Montgomery, Texas (Woodlands #2) File No. SES—LIC—20070703—00885 E—070132, Montgomery, Texas (Woodlands #3) File No. SES—LIC—20070703—00886 Dear Ms. Dortch: This letter is submitted on behalf of Fox Television Stations, Inc. ("FTS") to advise the Commission that the acts necessary to complete construction for certain antennas at the above—referenced facilities have been completed. Specifically, construction has been competed for the antennas identified as 1A, 2A, 2B, 3A, 4A, and 4B in the above—referenced licenses. As required by the conditions set forth in the licenses issued September 5, 2007, FTS certifies that the facilities have been constructed as authorized and that each antenna has been tested and is within 2 dB of the pattern specified in Section 25.209 of the Commuission‘s rules. Attached hereto please find an excerpt from a Field Test Report prepared by VertexRSI, the manufacturer of the antennas, confirming that the facilities are operating in compliance with the Commission‘s rules. Also attached is a copy of a report confirming that the facilities comply with the Commission‘s rules with respect to radiation exposure.

Marlene Dortch December 13, 2007 Page 2 In addition, please accept this letter as notification that FTS will commence operation of the facilities described herein on December 14, 2007. The facilities will remain operational during the license period unless FTS submits the licenses to the Commission for cancellation. Should you have any questions concerning this matter, kindly contact the undersigned. Respectfully submitted, Jared S. Sher Counsel to FTS Enclosures

GENERAL DYNAMICS C4 Systems FIELD TEST REPORT VERTEXRSI JOB # 40480F FT REPORT # 7070 TEST DATE: November 2007 ANTENNA SIZE: VertexRSI 9.0m ANTENNA TYPE: Cassegrain ANTENNA UTILIZATION: 4 Port RXITX FREQUENCY BAND: C—Band POLARIZATION: Linear LOCATION: The Woodlands, TX CUSTOMER: FOX Networks RF SPECIFICATION: 975—1717C FEED MODEL NUMBER: C90KP1FRCN PREPARED 8Yy: LUIS BUSTAMANTE VERTEXRSI 2600 LONGVIEW STREET KILGORE, TEXAS 75662 (903) 984—0555 EXPORT CONTROL WARNING — Do not disclose this document or its contents to non—U.S. persons, or transmit this document or its contents outside the United States without the written permission of Vertex Communications Corporation and required U.S. Government approvals.

VERTEXRSI CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY All computer software, technical data or other information pertaining to the equipment covered by this document is considered proprietary by VertexRSI. Such information transmitted in this document or related document is for the benefit of VertexRSI customers and is not to be disclosed to other parties verbally or in writing without prior written approval of VertexRSI. Additionally, this document may not be reproduced in whole or in part without written consent from VertexRSI. <"*]Vertex S ~* 180 9001 Registered

TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND ENDORSEMENTS......222,2022020020604444rrsevesvseversev se es ssevsrr es errravsenes 1 2.0 SUMMARY ....22020020¥verrrrrrrrererrerrrrerrrsrersercecsrrranvarsssessnnninuuav en ssssss esns sns rev en en e en en e se v en n n ns ene 1 3.0 DATA REDUCTION FORMULAS ....2.2222202a2202000s4rrrsssserere¢vas es 4446 e v es s rssrsrers s se en rrrrrrrrerssnnes 2 4.0 MAJOR PARAMETERS SUMMARY .....22220222222000¥0¥s¥¥¥¥¥tevtrrssresserrrrrrrrrressssssssessersaasssessiues 4 4.1 ANt@NMM@A OAAA ..........2.2.0222022v2vvvrevrrererrrerrrrererereeerrrerrerrerrerrberrerrrerressessrssesrrrrerrrrrrr es se rrrrrrrrees 4 4.2 ANt@MM@A OZA ...........2....0220222vv ze errrrrerrerrrrirerrrererirrrrrrrrrrrrrrversrsrrsrrrsrrrrrrrerrrsreserrrrrrees 4 4.3 ANt@MMN@ OZB ..............2.22200020rr es vaavrrrrrrrerrrrrrssreerrrrerrrrrrrerrrersereerrerererrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrres 5 4.4 ANt@BMMA OBA .........2.022222222ar e rrrrrrerresrrrerrvrrsarererssrrrrerrrrrrrrrrrrrererserrrrsserrrrrrrrrrrrreresrerra kss 5 4.5 ANt@MNN@A O4A .....2202222222222222vvvavvvavraavrverrerererrrrrererererrrererresarssarraarsrercrsereserearrrrrerrrree e en en en en 6 4.6 ANt@NMMN@A O4B .............2222222222av2vvvrrrrrrrrrrrrrssara se ererrrerererrrerersrerrererreersrssesrrrrrrrsesersrerrarreres 6 5.0 RECEIVE TEST RESULTS ...,202202202r¥rrrrr4rer44vr4¢8s 64484444486 sssirirsssr tss sasesesrersr es e aassessssses es i ues7 B1 ANf@NN@ OTA ...........2.ll02222222vsrvrvvvvveverveserrrrvrsssscssersesrcrerrsssrsserersesrerrereerresererrrerrrrrreraerrerrreee 8 B.2 ANt@NMMN@A OZA .............222l022022220vvvrvvevvrrevsreessssrrrrrsererrerreresrsssserssssrrerrererssserrrrrrrererrrrrrrrrrarek 19 5.3 ANI@MMN@ OZB .........2.22222220222222rrrvrvvvrvrvvrerrrcerrererresreersrsrrssrrrrererscrrrrsssresesverserrrrrrrrrerrrerererenee 31 B.4 ANI@MM@A OBA .......2222222222222222rrvvrvvrrvrvrrrrvvrrrrrrrrrrrrserrrccrerreerrrrrrrrrrrssersrrerrerrdrrrerrrarrrrrrrrrrrr e ies 43 5.5 ANI@MMN@A OAA ........2222220000200002rvvvvvvrvrvrvvrrrvrrereserresserserrrerrcrerrrererererssessrrerssreerrrrrrrrrrerrrerreres 55 5.6 ANt@NN@ O4B ............22200222022222rrrrvrevrrveverrrrrsresserversresssrrscrssrssersesescrrcrrererererrrerrerrrrrerererrrnes 67 6.0 TRANSMIT TEST RESULTS ....2.02200202uu00susscsssssrsusuuevescescvescerscces 6666 t 46646 assssssaseass ce es e r s ssnee 79 6.1 ANt@NMNA O1A ............0022lvrvrvrrrvrrrrrvrrvrrrrrassss se serrer e es ressreerscerrerrrrrrrrrrrrrerrrrerrerrrrrrerreseee 80 ©6.2 ANt@MNA OZA ...........l..000000020rervrrrrrerrrrvrraavarasrers iss es rrerersessserserrrrrerrrrrrrerrerererrerrerrrrerees 92 6.3 ANt@MM@ OZB ..............22002202002errrrvavavavrsavaasraassrrsverrrrrerrrrresseressrreeerrrrrrrerrrrrererrrrrrerrrrerreree 104 6.4 ANt@MNA OBA .............000022l22vvvrrvrrrrrrerrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrerssrsssasvseerrrsirreerrrrerrrrrrrreserresrerrrrrrrrrees 116 6.5 ANt@MNA O4A .............2022022222rrvvvravrvrsvrrraaavasas esc errrrrrerrressrerrresererrrrrrrrrrrrrerrrrrerrrerrrrrrreee 128 6.6 ANt@MMN@A O4A4B ..........2..00200220222e2ssravvervevrrvvarrvrssseerrrrrrerressereeereressrererrrrerrrerrersrerrseererrrrrrres 140 APPENDIX A. S.A.T. ANTENNA O1A.....222220000002500ssservivevsnnaunasncecrvecceccccers cssc e es es ccrcererrrreee 152 APPENDIX B. S.A.T. ANTENNA OZA..........22200.0000¥v¥vrvirvrvrersasserrr en nc errnnvern n n rnnnmnn mm es 164 APPENDIX C. S.A.T. ANTENNA OZB.....2...2.0206re2rrrverrrrrreerrrersrrrerserrarererreearreeserserrecerrrseriress 178 APPENDIX D. S.A.T. ANTENNA OBA ....,222222000020ververrsssvsvevesevevvecvcavecorvccvsssesssersssssscrrernrrrrraee 190 APPENDIX E. S.A.T. ANTENNA O4A ......2222022,000s00sssevvevevavevavruercrecsteccssssccssscrsccesvevsrersscsccrssee2204 APPENDIX F. S.A.T. ANTENNA O4B ....2222222,00022004rvrvversserssrecerrernnnnnnnnnaaanessscsssreccrsc ces resssevsees 217 {*pVertex RSI = 150 9001 Registered

1.0 INTRODUCTION The purpose of this document is to present the results of the transmit, receive and control system site acceptance tests. The tests present in this report were conducted using the VertexRSI corresponding test procedures. The tests were required after the recent installation of the antennas. The antennas, located in FOX Networks Earth Station in The Woodlands, Texas are 6 each 9.0 meter King Post mounted Cassegrain antenna systems with four ports, C—Band, linear polarized (LP) frequency reuse feed sub—system. 2.0 SUMMARY The RF test results contained in this report show the antenna performance for gain, G/T, sidelobe envelope and cross polarization isolation for the receive and transmit frequency bands. The antenna‘s gains were calculated by the 3db/10db beam width and integration methods. G/T values were derived from the specified antenna and system noise temperatures and the antennas measured gains. Co—polarization patterns were recorded and plotted under the 29—25*log(8) curve. Cross—polarization patterns were recorded and plotted under the corresponding co— polarization patterns. The gain measurement results for all 6 antennas meet the specifications well within measurement error, according to EIA—411—A Standard, Chapter 6. The (6) 9.0m antennas show good sidelobe suppression at transmit frequencies and comply with the regulatory requirements described in Title 47, Part 25.209C of the FCC. Job No.: 40480 FT No: 7070 Test Engineer: Rodolfo Robles Luis Bustamante 12/05/07 Alan B. Pollard 12/05/07 12/eg2)— [PGa. bebtba 2fefo Originator Date Approval Date Approval Date VertexRS! Antenna Products Division Kilgore, Texas Facility 2600 N. Longview St., Kilgore, TX 75662 Field Test Report Page 1

Radiation Hazard Report Page 1 of 5 Analysis of Non—lonizing Radiation for a 9.0—Meter Earth Station System This report analyzes the non—ionizing radiation levels for a 9.0—meter earth station system. The analysis and calculations performed in this report comply with the methods described in the FCC Office of Engineering and Technology Bulletin, No. 65 first published in 1985 and revised in 1997 in Edition 97—01. The radiation safety limits used in the analysis are in conformance with the FCC R&O 96—326. Bulletin No. 65 and the FCC R&O specifies that there are two separate tiers of exposure limits that are dependant on the situation in which the exposure takes place and/or the — status of the individuals who are subject to the exposure. The Maximum Permissible Exposure {(MPE) limits for persons in a General Population/Uncontrolled environment are shown in Table 1. The General Population/Uncontrolled MPE is a function of transmit frequency and is for an exposure period of thirty minutes or less. The MPE limits for persons in an Occupational/Controlled environment are shown in Table 2. The Occupational MPE is a function of transmit frequency and is for an exposure period of six minutes or less. The purpose of the analysis described in this report is to determine the power flux density levels of the earth station in the far—field, near—field, transition region, between the subreflector or feed and main reflector surface, at the main reflector surface, and between the antenna edge and the ground and to compare these levels to the specified MPEs. Table 1. Limits for General Population/Uncontrolled Exposure (MPE) Frequency Range (MHz) Power Density (mW/em") 30—300 0.2 300—1500 Frequency (MHz)*(0.8/1200) 1500—100,000 1.0 Table 2. Limits for Occupational/Controlled Exposure (MPE) Frequency Range (MHz) Power Density {mW/em") 30—300 1.0 300—1500 j Frequency (MHz)*(4.0/1200} 1500—100,000 5.0 Table 3. Formulas and Parameters Used for Determining Power Flux Densities Parameter Symbol Formula Value Units Antenna Diameter D Input 9.0 m Antenna Surface Area Asurtace 1 D/ 4 63.62 m* Subreflector Diameter Dsr_ Input 116.8 cm Area of Subreflector Asr x Ds,*/4 10714.59 cm* Frequency F Input 6175 MHz Wavelength A 300 /F 0.048583 m Transmit Power P input 468.00 W Antenna Gain (dBi) es Input 53.5 dBi Antenna Gain (factor) G 1 ozes"© 223872.1 n/a Pi | T Constant 3.1415927 n/a Antenna Efficiency m GM/I(AD®) 0.66 n/a

Radiation Hazard Report Page 2 of 5 1. Far Field Distance Calculation The distance to the beginning of the far field can be determined from the following equétion: Distance to the Far Field Region R; =0.60 D°/A (1) = 1000.4 m The maximum main beam power density in the far field can be determined from the following equation: On—Axis Power Density in the Far Field S; =GP/(4 1 R;") (2) = 8.382 W/im" = 0.833 mW/cm* 2. Near Field Calculation Power flux density is considered to be at a maximum value throughout the entire length of the defined Near Field region. The region is contained within a cylindrical volume having the same diameter as the antenna. Past the boundary of the Near Field region, the power density from the antenna decreases linearly with respect to increasing distance. The distance to the end of the Near Field can be determined from the following equation: Extent of the Near Field Ra = D/ (4 ) (3) = 4186.8 m The maximum power density in the Near Field can be determined from the following equation: Near Field Power Density Sa = 16.0 41 P / (xD°) (4) = 19.450 W/im* = 1.945 mW/cm* 3. Transition Region Calculation The Transition region is located between the Near and Far Field regions. The power density begins to decrease linearly with increasing distance in the Transition region. While the power density decreases inversely with distance in the Transition region, the power density decreases inversely with the square of the distance in the Far Field region. The maximum power density in the Transition region will not exceed that calculated for the Near Field region. The power density calculated in Section 1 is the highest power density the antenna can produce in any of the regions away from the antenna. The power density at a distance R, can be determined from the following equation: Transition Region Power Density S = Si Ry/R, (5) = 1.945 mW/cm*

Radiation Hazard Report Page 3 of 5 4. Region between the Main Reflector and the Subreflector Transmissions from the feed assembly are directed toward the subreflector surface, and are reflected back toward the main reflector. The most common feed assemblies are waveguide flanges, horns or subreflectors. The energy between the subreflector and the reflector surfaces can be calculated by determining the power density at the subreflector surface. This can be determined from the following equation: Power Density at the Subreflector Ss; = 4000 P / As, | (6) =174.715 mW/cm* 5. Main Reflector Region The power density in the main reflector is determined in the same manner as the power density at the subreflector. The area is now the area of the main reflector aperture and can be determined from the following equation: Power Density at the Main Reflector Surface Ssurtace Z4 P / Asurtace (7) = 29.426 W/im* = 2.943 mW/cm* 6. Region between the Main Reflector and the Ground Assuming uniform iflumination of the reflector surface, the power density between the antenna and the ground can be determined from the following equation: Power Density between Reflector and Ground Sq =P / Asurtace (8) = 7.356 W/im* = 0.736 mW/cm*

Radiation Hazard Report Page 4 of 5 7. Summary of Calculations Table 4. Summary of Expected Radiation levels for Uncontrolled Environment Calculated Maximum Radiation Power Density Level Region {mW/iecm"} Hazard Assessment 1. Far Field (R; = 1000.4 m) S¢ 0.833 Satisfies FCC MPE 2. Near Field (Ry= 416.8 m) Sn 1$.945 Potential Hazard 3. Transition Region (R,; < R, <Ry) S 1.945 Potential Hazard 4. Between Main Reflector and Ss 174.715 Potential Hazard Subreflector 5. Main Reflector Ssurtace 2.943 Potential Hazard 6. Between Main Reflector and Ground So 0.736 Satisfies FCC MPE Table 5. Summary of Expected Radiation levels for Controlled Environment Calculated Maximum Radiation Power Density Region Level (mW/em*) Hazard Assessment 1. Far Field (Rg= 1000.4 m} S¢ 0.833 Satisfies FCC MPE 2. Near Field (Ry= 416.8 m) Sat 1.945 Satisfies FCC MPE 3. Transition Region (R; < R;< Ry) e 1.945 Satisfies FCC MPE 4. Between Main Reflector and Ssr 174.715 Potential Hazard Subreflector 5. Main Reflector Ssurtace 2.943 Satisfies FCC MPE 6. Between Main Reflector and Ground Sq 0.736 Satisfies FCC MPE It is the applicant‘s responsibility to ensure that the public and operational personnel are not exposed to harmful levels of radiation. 8. Conclusions Based on the above analysis it is concluded that the FCC MPE guidelines have been exceeded {or met) in the regions of Table 4 and 5. The applicant proposes to comply with the MPE limits by one or more of the following methods. Means of Compliance Uncontrolled Areas This antenna will be located in a fenced area. The area will be sufficient to prohibit access to the areas that exceed the MPE limited. The general public will not have access to areas within Va diameter removed from the edge of the antenna. Since one diameter removed from the main beam of the antenna or % diameter removed from the edge of the antenna the RF levels are reduced by a factor of 100 or 20 dB. None of the areas exceeding the MPE levels will be accessible by the general public.

Radiation Hazard Report Page 5 of 5 Radiation hazard signs will be posted while this earth station is in operation. The applicant will ensure that no buildings or other obstacles will be in the areas that exceed the MPE levels. Means of Compliance Gontrolled Areas The earth stations operational will not have access to the areas that exceed the MPE levels while the earth station is in operation. The transmitters will be turned off during antenna maintenance.


Document Created: 2019-04-14 13:12:12
Document Modified: 2019-04-14 13:12:12
© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC