Attachment Motion

Motion

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME submitted by The Boeing Company (Boeing)

Motion

2006-05-08

This document pretains to SES-LIC-20060228-00326 for License on a Satellite Earth Station filing.

IBFS_SESLIC2006022800326_499713

RECEIVED RECEIVED Before the — 8 2006 may 1 1 2008 reperat communications commssion .‘ Satelte Diision Washington, D.C. 20554 Faten!Conmunicatons Connissn InternationalBureau oftcecty Application of: ) ) THE BOEING COMPANY ) File Nos. SES—LIC—20060228—00326 ) and SES—AMD—20060324—00507 For Blanket Authority To Operate Barth ) Stations Onboard Vessels in the 14.0—14.5 ) Call Sign E060070 GHz and 11.2—12.75 GHz Bands ) Morion FoR FURTHER EXTENSION or TiME The Bocing Company ("Bocing"), by its attomeys, hereby filesthis Motion for Further Extension ofTime in the above—captioned application proceeding. Comments on Bocing‘s application were fled by PanAmSat Corporation (*PanAmSat") on April21, 2006; and comments on Bocing‘s application amendment were filed by ViaSat, Inc. (‘ViaSat") on April 28, 2006. Bocing sought a brief seven—day extension oftreply period in the application procceding to permit the filing of a consolidated reply on May 8, 206. In support of ts original extension request, Bocing noted that certain ssues raised in PanAmSat‘s comments with respect to Bocing‘s proposed operations were stil being addressed by PanAmSat and the operator ofthe AMC—6 satellite, SES Americom, Inc., and that the brief extension requested therein should provide sufficient time to resolve the issues raised in PanAmSat‘s comments. However, PanAmSat and SES Americom remain in discussions. Bocing understands that the issues should be resolved in the near term. Accordingly, Boeing seeks a further two—week extension oftime to permit filng of a reply pleading on May 22, 2006. ‘ See The Bocing Company, Motion forExtension of Time (iled May 1, 2006)

PanAmSat does not object to the requested extension of time. Moreover, grant of Bocing‘s request would promote administrative efficiency and preserve scarce Commission resources by permitting a single reply filing addressing all outstanding issues in this application proceeding. Finally, Bocing would note that the comments fled by ViaSat in this proceeding were entirely supportive of Bocing‘s application. Therefore, Boeing does not intend to address ViaSat‘s comments in its reply, and ViaSat‘s concurrence is not necessary to grant the requested further extension of time. For these reasons, Bocing respectfully requests that the Commission grant ts Motion for Further Extension of Time and permit Bocing to file a reply pleading on May 22, 2006. Respectfully submitted, THE BOEING COMPANY PB Carlos M. Nalda Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popco PC 701 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20004 Counselfor The Boeing Company May 8, 2006

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 1, Carlos Nalda, hereby certify that on this 8th day of May, 2006 a copy ofthe foregoing Motion was served via first class mail on the following: Joe Godles Goldberg, Godles, Wiener & Wright 1229 19° Street, NW. Washington, D.C. 20036 Carlos M. Nalda M


Document Created: 2006-05-11 16:02:11
Document Modified: 2006-05-11 16:02:11
© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC