Attachment E040194A

This document pretains to SES-LIC-20040426-00589 for License on a Satellite Earth Station filing.

IBFS_SESLIC2004042600589_377936

From: Bill Howden Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2004 10:03 AM To: Towanda Bryant Cc: Frank Peace Subject: FW: NG Earth Station Application Importance: High Towanda - I think the numbers provided herein will enable us to accept the application for filing. What is our procedure for accepting email input from the applicant, and does the application need to go back on PN? As a separate matter, NG notes significant felony convictions. -----Original Message----- From: Siddall, David R. [mailto:davidsiddall@paulhastings.com] Sent: Friday, June 18, 2004 11:03 AM To: Bill Howden Subject: RE: NG Earth Station Application Importance: High Bill, With regard to question E49, we have determined that an error was made in not adding in the gain of the antenna. Since that gain is 49.54, the answer is (+) 29.54. Thanks again. Dave Siddall Counsel to Northrop Grumman ________________________________________________________________________________ __________ David R. Siddall, Attorney| Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker LLP | 1299 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Tenth Floor, Washington, D.C. 20004 | direct: 202 508 9519 | main: 202 508 9500 | direct fax: 202 508 8519 | davidsiddall@paulhastings.com| www.paulhastings.com <http://www.paulhastings.com> -----Original Message----- From: Bill Howden [mailto:Bill.Howden@fcc.gov] Sent: Friday, June 18, 2004 9:45 AM To: Siddall, David R.; Frank Peace Subject: RE: NG Earth Station Application David, I'm wondering if what is asked for in E49 is clear? A value of -20 dBW/4kHz is entirely inconsistent (in the sense of

25.112(a)(1)) with 55.76 dBW for E48, and -20 dBW/4kHz is a value so small that operability is doubtful. Consequently, these numbers, in my opinion, raise substantial and material questions of fact, in the sense of Section 309(d)(2) of the Communications Act. Our instructions for E49(B7g) are "For transmit mode, provide the maximum EIRP Density, in dBW/4KHz, for each r.f. carrier of the emission." The term "EIRP" makes clear that the variable is an output from, not an input to, the antenna. I'd like to get this matter resolved by COB today, and I'm available this morning to assist you to that end. Bill -----Original Message----- From: Siddall, David R. [mailto:davidsiddall@paulhastings.com] Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2004 10:01 AM To: Frank Peace; Bill Howden Subject: NG Earth Station Application Bill, I have attached a link budget that was generated by Robert Bernard of NG. It was calculated for a worst case (greatest power to be used) operational scenario. Accordingly, we request the following changes to the FCC application: E38 to read 16.6 watts E40 to read 55.76 dBW E48 to read 55.76 dBW E49 to read -20 dBW/4kHz (Note: The E49 number is obtained by adding +36dB (10Log4000) to the spectral power density of -56.02 dBW/Hz in the link budget. This results in the power density reading in a 4kHz bandwidth.) I hope that this information provides the required data. Please do not hesitate to contact me if additional information is needed. Thank you Very much. David Siddall _____________________________________ This message is sent by a law firm and may contain information that is privileged or confidential. If you received this transmission in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete the message and any attachments. For additional information, please visit our website at www.paulhastings.com.


Document Created: 2004-06-23 11:25:37
Document Modified: 2004-06-23 11:25:37
© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC