Attachment DOC354

This document pretains to SES-LIC-20040311-00365 for License on a Satellite Earth Station filing.

IBFS_SESLIC2004031100365_364818

EXHIBIT A

pP00Z ‘Z HODHYYW L¢¥1,0€ VINISMIA ‘NYNSHSY axI{vA317IN08 WVA VININVP OOZ61 HOYYISWOD ‘Ag pauedaiq uolje}s ypieg ojl||ojeq aNVTIANVMW ‘€E€ NMOLSH3OVH o ‘LVS73LN1 101 pauedaiq LYOd4¥ SISATIVNV 4JONJ¥IJ4¥TJLNI QNV NOILVYNIQY4OO0D ADN3NOTI¥{

TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. CONCLUSIONS ......22220022000000rvrvrrvrerevirtrrrrrtrrertrrrrrrrrrrsserrersrrersssrrererreresrrsrerrresssrerrrrsarrrreereresererrssrrrrrserrerrrreaks 3 2. SUMMARY OF RESULTS ......22.22020022202errervrsrtrrstrrrerrrrrrrrrrrerrrerresrrrirrrssrressssrrssrrresrrrrrrrsrrrcrrrrrsersrr is rrrerrarre es 4 3. SUPPLEMENTAL SHOWING ...1..222.00202022220222retavrerersrrsrresrrrrrrrrssrrrrerersrrrrrrirrrrrerrrssrrassrrsreree iss rrsrerrrrarreriaes 5 4. EARTH STATION COORDINATION DATA .....2.0.2222222002¥2v3rs¥vtarerrrtrsrrrtrserrsrrrssrerrritseserssresrrvrrerrrrerreseerrerrrrees 7 B. CERTIFICATION ..2222022220220222verrrvesrrererrrerrrerrrrrresevrrerresererererrerseresversrrrrsrrrreskrrrrserrcrerrrerrrriavrrersrrresersersarekraes 11 Frequency Coordination and Interference Analysis Report 03/02/2004 Page 2 of 11

1. CONCLUSIONS An interference study considering all existing, proposed and prior coordinated microwave facilities within the coordination contours of the proposed earth station demonstrates that this site will operate satisfactorily with the common carrier microwave environment. Further, there will be no restrictions of its operation due to interference considerations. Frequency Coordination and Interference Analysis Report 03/02/2004 Page 3 of 11

2. SUMMARY OF RESULTS A number of great circle interference cases were identified during the interference study of the proposed earth station. Each of the cases, which exceeded the interference objective on a line—of—sight basis, was profiled and the propagation losses estimated using NBS TN101 (Revised) techniques. The losses were found to be sufficient to reduce the signal levels to acceptable magnitudes in every case. The following companies reported potential great circle interference conflicts that did not meet the objectives on a line—of—sight basis. When over—the—horizon losses are considered on the interfering paths, sufficient blockage exists to negate harmful interference from occurring with the proposed transmit—receive earth station. Company Cellco Partnership — Pa. Region Hardy Cellular Telephone Company Vanguard Cellular Pennsylvania, LLC No Other Carriers Reported Potential Interference Cases. Frequency Coordination and Interference Analysis Report 03/02/2004 Page 4 of 11

3. SUPPLEMENTAL SHOWING Pursuant to Part 25.203(c) of the FCC Rules and Regulations, the satellite earth station proposed in this application was coordinated by Comsearch using computer techniques and in accordance with Part 25 of the FCC Rules and Regulations. Coordination data for this earth station was sent to the below listed carriers with a letter dated January 27, 2004. Company ACC Pennsylvania License, LLC ACCELACOM—BALTIMORE LLC ALBEMARLE COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT ALLENTOWN SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF MARYLAND INC AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF PENNSYLVANIA, INC AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF VIRGINIA INC Alite! Communications of Virginia, Inc. Bucks County Dept of Emergency Comm CELLCO PARTNERSHIP — NEWARK—DALLAS—ROUTE CELLCO PARTNERSHIP — VIRGINIA CELLCO PARTNERSHIP— PA REGION CHARLOTTESVILLE CELLULAR PARTNERSHIP CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS VI, LLC. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,RADIO PROJ. CORBAN COMMUNICATIONS INC. CROWN COMMUNICATION, INC. County of Berks DAUPHIN COUNTY EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT EASTERBROOKE CELLULAR CORPORATION Enoch Pratt Free Library GANNETT COMPANY INC GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY INSTR FNDTION HARDY CELLULAR TELEPHONE COMPANY Intermedia Services, LLC. JUNIATA COUNTY OF LANCASTER COUNTY OF LB Tower Company LLC LOUDOUN COUNTY GOVERNMENT Local Communications Network, Inc. MARYLAND PUBLIC BROADCATING COMMISSION MARYLAND, STATE OF MIEMSS COMMUNICATIONS MCI Network Services, Inc. MOBILE SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS INC Frequency Coordination and Interference Analysis Report 03/02/2004 Page 5 of 11

ORBCOMM GLOBAL LP NATIONAL RADIO ASTRONOMY OBSERVATORY NEWCOM 9—1—1 PENNSYLVANIA MICROWAVE NETWORK INC. PENNSYLVANIA TURNPIKE COMMISSION PITTSBURGH CELLULAR TELEPHONE COMPANY PITTSBURGH CITY TELECOM BUREAU PITTSBURGH SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP PUBLIC BROADCASTING SERVICE Peco Energy Company Philly Sports Wireless SCHUYLKILL COUNTY PUBLIC SAFETY 911 SOUTHWESTERN BELL MOBILE SYS LLC — DC TELIGENT INC. UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND ITV SYSTEM USCOC OF CUMBERLAND, INC. VIRGINIA RSA #7, INC. Vanguard Cellular Pennsylvania, LLC Verizon New Jersey, Inc. Verizon Virginia, Inc. WHYY, INC. WINEMILLER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. WINSTAR WIRELESS FIBER CORPORATION Warrenton Fauguier Joint Communications Frequency Coordination and Interference Analysis Report 03/02/2004 Page 6 of 11

4. EARTH STATION COORDINATION DATA This section presents the data pertinent to frequency coordination of the proposed earth station that was circulated to all carriers within its coordination contours. Frequency Coordination and Interference Analysis Report 03/02/2004 Page 7 of 11

Date: 01/27/2004 Job Number: Administrative Information Status ENGINEER PROPOSAL Call Sign Licensee Code INTELS Licensee Name INTELSAT, LLC Site Information HAGERSTOWN 33, MARYLAND Venue Name Latitude (NAD 83) 39° 35‘ 59.7" N Longitude (NAD 83) 77° 45‘ 29.7" W Climate Zone A Rain Zone 2 Ground Elevation (AMSL) 171.3 m / 562.0 ft Link Information Satellite Type Geostationary Mode TR — Transmit—Receive Modulation Digital Satellite Arc 6° W to 143° West Longitude Azimuth Range 101.9° to 253.6° Corresponding Elevation Angles 5.3° / 10.3° Antenna Centerline (AGL) 3.05 m / 10.0 ft Antenna Information Receive Transmit Manufacturer Vertex/RSI Vertex/RSI Model 4.8 KPK 4.8 KPK Gain / Diameter 53.5 dBi / 4.8 m 55.2 dBi / 4.8 m 3—dB / 15—dB Beamwidth 0.34° / 0.72° 0.28° / 0.59° Max Available RF Power (dBW/4 kHz) ~14.0 (dBW/MHz) 10.0 Maximum EIRP (dBW/4 kHz) 41.2 (dBW/MHz) 65.2 (dBW) 79.0 Interference Objectives: Long Term —~156.0 dBW/MHz 20% —151.0 dBW/4 kHz 20% Short Term —146.0 dBW/MHz 0.01% —128.0 dBW/4 kHz —0.0025% Frequency Information Receive 11.0 GHz Transmit 14.0 GHz Emission / Frequency Range (MHz) 43K8G7ZW — 72M0G7ZW / 10950.0 — 11200.0 43K8G7W — 72M0G7ZW / 14000.0 — 14500.0 43K8GTW — 72M0G7W / 11450.0 — 12200.0 Max Great Circle Coordination Distance 566.8 km / 352.1 mi 251.4 km / 156.2 mi Precipitation Scatter Contour Radius 602.2 km / 374.2 mi 100.0 km / 62.1 mi Frequency Coordination and Interference Analysis Report 03/02/2004 Page 8 of 11

Coordination Values HAGERSTOWN 33, MD Licensee Name INTELSAT, LLC Latitude (NAD 83) 39° 35‘ 59.7" N Longitude (NAD 83) 77° 45‘ 29.7" W Ground Elevation (AMSL) 171.3 m / 562.0 ft Antenna Centerline (AGL) 3.05 m / 10.0 ft Antenna Model Vertex/RSI 4.8 KPK Antenna Mode Receive 11.0 GHz Transmit 14.0 GHz Interference Objectives: Long Term —156.0 dBw/MHz 20% —151.0 dBW/4 kHz 20% Short Term —146.0 dBW/MHz 0.01% —128.0 dBW/4 kHz 0.0025% Max Available RF Power —14.0 (dBW/4 kHz) Receive 11.0 GHz Transmit 14.0 GHz Horizon Antenna Horizon Coordination Horizon Coordination Azimuth (°) Elevation (°) Discrimination (°) Gain (dBi) Distance (km) Gain (dBi) Distance (km) 0 0.36 101.82 —10.00 216.68 ~10.00 103.77 5 0.26 96.84 —10.00 225.85 —10.00 111.37 10 0.22 91.86 —10.00 229.77 10.00 114.53 15 0.21 86.88 —10.00 230.37 —10.00 115.01 20 0.22 81.90 —10.00 229.77 ~10.00 114.53 25 0.22 76.92 ~10.00 229.58 —10.00 114.38 30 0.21 71.94 —10.00 23015 —10.00 114.83 35 0.00 66.97 —10.00 231.37 ~10.00 115.80 40 0.00 62.00 ~10.00 231.37 ~10.00 115.80 45 0.00 57.03 ~10.00 231.37 ~10.00 115.80 50 0.00 52.06 —10.00 231.37 —10.00 115.80 55 0.00 47.10 —9.82 23214 —9.82 116.24 60 0.00 42. 14 —8.62 237.52 —8.62 119.26 65 0.00 37.19 —7.26 243.78 —7.26 122.68 70 0.00 32.26 —5.72 251.29 —5.72 126.62 75 0.00 27.35 —3.92 260.19 —3.92 130.01 80 0.00 22.47 ~1.79 271.24 —1.79 135.88 85 0.00 17.66 0.83 285.48 0.83 143.83 90 0.00 12.98 417 301.97 417 155.17 95 0.00 8.66 8.56 332.92 8.56 17317 100 0.00 5.61 13.27 566.78 13.27 251.39 105 0.00 6.15 12.28 420.50 12.28 195.99 110 0.00 9.60 7.45 324.46 7.45 168.95 115 0.00 13.27 3.93 300.47 3.93 154.30 120 0.00 16.89 1.31 288.17 1.31 145.38 125 0.00 20.41 —0.75 276.81 —0.75 138.95 130 0.00 23.83 —2.43 267.88 —2. 43 134.07 135 0.00 2711 —3.83 260.67 —3.83 130.26 140 0.00 30.23 —5.01 254.75 —5.01 128.44 145 0.00 33.14 —6.01 249.87 —6.01 125.87 150 0.00 35.81 —6.85 245.83 —6.85 123.72 155 0.00 38.20 —7.55 242.42 —7.55 121.94 160 0.00 40.26 —8.12 239.78 —8.12 120.50 165 0.00 41.92 —8.56 237.77 —8.56 119.40 170 0.00 43.16 —8.88 236.35 —8.88 118.61 175 0.00 43.92 —9.07 235.50 —9.07 11813 180 0.00 4417 —9.13 235.22 —9.13 117.97 185 0.00 43.92 —9.07 235.50 —9.07 118.13 Frequency Coordination and Interference Analysis Report 03/02/2004 Page 9 of 11

Coordination Values HAGERSTOWN33, MD Licensee Name INTELSAT, LLC Latitude (NAD 83) 39° 35‘ 59.7" N Longitude (NAD 83) 77° 45‘ 29.7" W Ground Elevation (AMSL) 171.3 m / 562.0 ft Antenna Centerline (AGL) 3.05 m / 10.0 ft Antenna Model Vertex/RSI 4.8 KPK Antenna Mode Receive 11.0 GHz Transmit 14.0 GHz Interference Objectives: Long Term —156.0 dBW/MHz 20% —151.0 dBW/4 kHz 20% Short Term —146.0 dBW/MHz 0.01% —128.0 dBW/4 kHz 0.0025% Max Available RF Power ~14.0 (dBW/4 kHz) Receive 11.0 GHz Transmit 14.0 GHz Horizon Antenna Horizon Coordination Horizon Coordination Azimuth (°) Elevation (°) Discrimination (°) Gain (dBi) Distance (km) Gain (dBi) Distance (km) 190 0.00 43.16 —8.88 236.35 —8.88 118.61 195 0.00 41.92 —8.56 237.77 —8.56 119.40 200 0.00 40.26 —8.12 239.79 —8.12 120.51 205 0.31 37.94 —7.48 231.50 —7.48 113.21 210 0.55 35.37 —6.72 215.42 —6.72 100.00 215 0.58 32.69 —5.86 217.61 —5.86 100.00 220 0.52 29.84 ~4.87 225.17 ~4.87 104.81 225 0.39 26.82 —3.71 241.80 ~—3.71 116.82 230 0.34 23.59 —2.32 254.38 —2.32 124.70 235 0.31 2019 —0.63 265.48 —0.63 129.66 240 0.35 16.64 1.47 272.76 1.47 132.22 245 0.45 13.04 4.12 278.26 4.12 132.40 250 0.44 10.47 6.50 293.28 6.50 140.48 255 0.21 1015 6.84 358.90 6.84 173.32 260 0.32 11.80 5.20 294.49 5.20 146.54 265 0.31 15.08 2.54 283.67 2.54 139.38 270 0.36 19.07 —0.01 263.71 —0.01 128.68 275 0.36 23.47 —2.26 251.78 —2.26 122.60 280 0.27 28.09 ~4.21 251.06 —4.21 124.62 285 0.00 32.86 —5.92 250.32 —5.92 126.11 290 0.00 37.61 —7.38 243.20 —7.38 122.37 295 0.00 42.41 ~—8.69 237.20 —8.69 119.08 300 0.20 47.22 —9.85 231.87 —9.85 116.06 305 0.24 52.08 —10.00 227.17 —10.00 112.44 310 0.29 56.96 —10.00 222.78 ~10.00 108.86 315 0.23 61.86 —~10.00 228.90 —~10.00 113.83 320 0.22 66.77 —~10.00 229.05 —10.00 113.95 325 0.00 71.69 ~10.00 231.37 ~10.00 115.80 330 0.00 76.61 —10.00 231.37 ~10.00 115.80 335 0.24 81.52 —10.00 227.83 —10.00 112.97 340 0.36 86.44 ~10.00 215.89 ~10.00 103.10 345 0.33 91.36 —10.00 218.72 —~10.00 105.48 350 0.33 96.29 —10.00 219.34 ~10.00 106.01 355 0.21 101.21 ~10.00 230.80 —10.00 115.35 Frequency Coordination and Interference Analysis Report 03/02/2004 Page 10 of 11

5. CERTIFICATION I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT | AM THE TECHNICALLY QUALIFIED PERSON RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PREPARATION OF THE FREQUENCY COORDINATION DATA CONTAINED IN THIS APPLICATION, THAT 1 AM F AMILIAR W ITH PARTS 101 AND 25 OF THE FCC RULES AND REGULATIONS, THAT 1 HAVE EITHER PREPARED OR REVIEWED THE FREQUENCY COORDINATION DATA SUBMITTED WITH THIS APPLICATION, AND THAT IT IS COMPLETE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. %M E. Gyla»" JEFFREY E. COWLES PRINCIPAL FREQUENCY PLANNER COMSEARCH 19700 JANELIA FARM BLVD. ASHBURN, VA 20147 DATED: MARCH 2, 2004 Frequency Coordination and Interference Analysis Report 03/02/2004 Page 11 of 11

EXHIBIT B

Exhibit B Radiation Hazard Report Page 1 of 5 Analysis of Non—lonizing Radiation for a 4.8—Meter Earth Station System This report analyzes the non—ionizing radiation levels for a 4.8—meter earth station system. The analysis and calculations performed in this report comply with the methods described in the FCC Office of Engineering and Technology Bulletin, No. 65 first published in 1985 and revised in 1997 in Edition 97—01. The radiation safety limits used in the analysis are in conformance with the FCC R&O 96—326. Bulletin No. 65 and the FCC R&O specifies that there are two separate tiers of exposure limits that are dependant on the situation in which the exposure takes place and/or the status of the individuals who are subject to the exposure. The Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) limits for persons in a General Population/Uncontrolied environment are shown in Table 1. The General Population/Uncontrolled MPE is a function of transmit frequency and is for an exposure period of thirty minutes or less. The MPE limits for persons in an Occupational/Controlled environment are shown in Table 2. The Occupational MPE is a function of transmit frequency and is for an exposure period of six minutes or less. The purpose of the analysis described in this report is to determine the power flux density levels of the earth station in the far—field, near—field, transition region, between the subreflector or feed and main reflector surface, at the main reflector surface, and between the antenna edge and the ground and to compare these levels to the specified MPEs. Table 1. Limits for General Population/Uncontrolled Exposure (MPE) Frequency Range (MHz) Power Density (mW/cm*) 30—300 0.2 300—1500 Frequency (MHz)*(0.8/1200) 1500—100,000 1.0 Table 2. Limits for Occupational/Controlled Exposure (MPE) Frequency Range (MHz) Power Density (mW/cmz) 30—300 1.0 300—1500 Frequency (MHz)*(4.0/1200) 1500—100,000 5.0 Table 3. Formulas and Parameters Used for Determining Power Flux Densities Parameter Symbol Formula Value Units Antenna Diameter D Input 4.8 m Antenna Surface Area Asurface x D*/ 4 18.10 m* Subreflector Diameter Ds Input 36.6 cm Area of Subreflector Asr x Dy "/4 1052.09 cm" Frequency F Input 14250 MHz Wavelength A 300 / F 0.021053 m Transmit Power P Input 750.00 W Antenna Gain (dBi) Ges Input 55.2 dBi Antenna Gain (factor) G 10°°""° 331131.1 n/a Pi T Constant 3.1415927 n/a Antenna Efficiency m G"!(rD") 0.65 n/a

Exhibit B Radiation Hazard Report Page 2 of 5 1. Far Field Distance Calculation The distance to the beginning of the far field can be determined from the following equation: Distance to the Far Field Region R; = 0.60 D/ a (1) = 656.6 m The maximum main beam power density in the far field can be determined from the following equation: On—Axis Power Density in the Far Field Sg =GP/(4 t R;") (2) = 45.835 W/m* = 4.583 mW/cm" 2. Near Field Calculation Power flux density is considered to be at a maximum value throughout the entire length of the defined Near Field region. The region is contained within a cylindrical volume having the same diameter as the antenna. Past the boundary of the Near Field region, the power density from the antenna decreases linearly with respect to increasing distance. The distance to the end of the Near Field can be determined from the following equation: Extent of the Near Field Ry = D* / (4 2) (3) = 273.6 m The maximum power density in the Near Field can be determined from the following equation: Near Field Power Density Sar = 16.0 1 P / (1 D) (4) = 106.999 W/m* = 10.700 mW/em* 3. Transition Region Calculation The Transition region is located between the Near and Far Field regions. The power density begins to decrease linearly with increasing distance in the Transition region. While the power density decreases inversely with distance in the Transition region, the power density decreases inversely with the square of the distance in the Far Field region. The maximum power density in the Transition region will not exceed that calculated for the Near Field region. The power density calculated in Section 1 is the highest power density the antenna can produce in any of the regions away from the antenna. The power density at a distance R, can be determined from the following equation: Transition Region Power Density S = Sn Ra/R (5) = 10.700 mW/cm*

Exhibit B Radiation Hazard Report Page 3 of 5 4. Region between the Main Reflector and the Subreflector Transmissions from the feed assembly are directed toward the subreflector surface, and are reflected back toward the main reflector. The most common feed assemblies are waveguide flanges, horns or subreflectors. The energy between the subreflector and the reflector surfaces can be calculated by determining the power density at the subreflector surface. This can be determined from the following equation: Power Density at the Subreflector Ss, = 4000 P / Ag (6) = 2851.473 mW/cm* 5. Main Reflector Region The power density in the main reflector is determined in the same manner as the power density at the subreflector. The area is now the area of the main reflector aperture and can be determined from the following equation: Power Density at the Main Reflector Surface Ssurface > 4 P / Agurface (7) = 165.786 W/m* = 16.579 mW/cm* 6. Region between the Main Reflector and the Ground Assuming uniform iflumination of the reflector surface, the power density between the antenna and the ground can be determined from the following equation: Power Density between Reflector and Ground Sg = P / Asurtace (8) = 41.447 W/im" = 4.145 mW/cm*

Exhibit B Radiation Hazard Report Page 4 of 5 7. Summary of Calculations Table 4. Summary of Expected Radiation levels for Uncontrolled Environment Region Calculated Maximum Hazard Assessment Radiation Power Density Level ({mW/cm*) 1. Far Field (Rg; = 656.6 m) Sy 4.583 Potential Hazard 2. Near Field (R,; = 273.6 m) Sn 10.700 Potential Hazard 3. Transition Region (R,; < R, < Rg) S; 10.700 Potential Hazard 4. Between Main Reflector and Sg 2851.473 Potential Hazard Subreflector 5. Main Reflector Ssurtace _16.579 Potential Hazard 6. Between Main Reflector and Ground Sq 4.145 Potential Hazard Table 5. Summary of Expected Radiation levels for Controlled Environment Region Calculated Maximum Hazard Assessment Radiation Power Density Level (mW/cm*) 1. Far Field (Rg = 656.6 m) S¢ 4.583 Satisfies FCC MPE 2. Near Field (R,,; = 273.6 m) Saf 10.700 Potential Hazard 3. Transition Region (Ry, < R, < Rg) S; 10.700 Potential Hazard 4. Between Main Reflector and S 2851.473 Potential Hazard Subreflector 5. Main Reflector Sscurface 16.579 Potential Hazard 6. Between Main Reflector and Ground Sq 4.145 Satisfies FCC MPE It is the applicant‘s responsibility to ensure that the public and operational personnel are not exposed to harmful levels of radiation.

Exhibit B Radiation Hazard Report Page 5 of 5 8. Conclusions Based upon the above analysis, it is concluded that harmful levels of radiation may exist in those regions noted for the Uncontrolled (Table 4) and Controlled (Table 5) Environments. The antennas will be installed at the Intelsat, LLC facility in Hagerstown, Maryland. The facility is surrounded by a fence, which will restrict any public access. The earth stations will be marked with the standard radiation hazard warnings, as well as the area in the vicinity of the earth stations to inform those in the general population, who might be working or otherwise present in or near the direct path of the main beam. The applicant will ensure that the main beam of the antennas will be pointed at least one diameter away from any building, or other obstacles in those areas that exceed the MPE levels. Since one diameter removed from the center of the main beam the levels are down at least 20 dB, or by a factor of 100, these potential hazards do not exist for either the public, or for earth station personnel. Finally, the earth station‘s operating personnel will not have access to areas that exceed the MPE levels, while the earth station is in operation. The transmitter will be turned off during periods of maintenance, so that the MPE standard of 5.0 mw/cm**2 will be complied with for those regions in close proximity to the main reflector, which could be occupied by operating personnel.

EXHIBIT C

EXHIBIT C Page 1 of 1 FAA Notification Not Required Per PART 17[17.14(a)] ofthe FCC rules, FAA notification is not required, as the antenna structure is located in an area with structures of equal or greater heights.

EXHIBIT D

Exhibit D Response to Question 21 Intelsat LLC seeks to operate this earth station on both a common carrier and non—common carrier basis. However, the electronic response to Question 21 only permits an applicant to check one box. Accordingly, Intelsat LLC checked one box—the box marked non—common carrier—and submits this exhibit to make clear that both boxes—the box marked non—common carrier and the box marked common carrier—should be checked.


Document Created: 2019-04-23 16:15:55
Document Modified: 2019-04-23 16:15:55
© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC