Attachment Dismissal letter

This document pretains to SES-AFS-20060811-01354 for Amendment Foreign Satellite App on a Satellite Earth Station filing.

IBFS_SESAFS2006081101354_519310

                         Federal Communications Commission
                               Washington, D.C. 20554


                                                                                             DA 06-1634

                                           August 15,2006

Mr. William M. Wiltshire
Harris, Wiltshire & Grannis, LLP
1200 Eighteenth Street, NW
12‘”Floor
Washington, DC 20036

                                                Re:    Call Sign: E060158
                                                       File No.: SES-LIC-200605 05 -00764
                                                       File No.: SES-AFS-200608 1 1-0 1354

                                                       Call Sign: E060159
                                                       File No.: SES-L1C-20060505-00765
                                                       File No.: SES-AFS-200608 1 1-01353


Dear Mr. Wiltshire:

On May 5, 2006, WB Holdings 1 LLC (WB) filed the above-captioned applications for two new
Ka- Band’ gateway earth stations.2 These applications were amended on August 1 1,2006. For
the reason detailed below, we dismiss the applications as defective without prejudice to refiling.

Section 25.1 15(e) of the Commission’s rules, 47 C.F.R. 5 25.1 15(e), provides that
“[A]pplications to license individual earth station operating in 20/30 GHz band shall be filed on
FCC Form 3 12, Main Form and a Schedule B, and shall also include the information describe i n
Section 25.138”. WB did not submit the antenna radiation patterns required by Section 25.138(d)
of the Commission’s rules, 47 C.F.R. fj 25.138(d). Therefore, the applications, as amended, are
incomplete.

Additionally, the applications, as amended, indicate that the stations’ “necessary bandwidth” is
22.5 megahertz. The frequency coordination report filed as Exhibit B; however, indicates that
WB coordinated a bandwidth only up to 20.3 megahertz. Thus, WB must resolve this
discrepancy in any refiling.

While we dismiss the applications on the above basis, we take the opportunity to apprise you of
other issues we have should WB choose to re-file the applications.



’
                             ~~




    18.3-18.8, 19.7-20.2,28.35-28.6,29.25-30.0 GHz bands.

    Station call sign E060158 will be located in Carlton, Minnesota and station call sign E060159 will be
located in Gig Harbor, Washington.


                                    Federal Communications Commission                         DA 06-1634


We note that there are discrepancies in the coordinates for the earth station sites provided in the
applications and the frequency coordination studies. Specifically, for station call sign E060 1 58,
WB lists the north latitude coordinate as 46” 39’ g”,   and the longitude coordinate as 92” 28’ 3’’
in response to Questions El 1 and E12 of the application. However, the frequency coordination
study lists the latitude coordinate as 46” 39’ &“and the longitude coordinate as 92” 28’ 48“. For
station call sign E0601 59, WB lists the north latitude coordinate as 47” 20’      a”
                                                                                   and the longitude
coordinate as 122” 36’ @“ in the application. However, the frequency coordination study lists
the latitude coordinate as 47” 20’ 18.6” and the longitude coordinate as 122” 36’ 34.2”. These
discrepancies should be resolved should WB choose to refile its application.

I n light of the above, pursuant to Section 25.1 12(a)(1)3of the Commission’s rules, 47 C.F.R. 5
25.1 12(a)(l), and Section 0.261 of the Commission’s rules on delegations of authority, 47 C.F.R.
5 0.261, we dismiss the applications, as amended, as defective without prejudice to refiling.4

                                                          Sincerely,



                                                          Scott A. Kotler
                                                          Chief, Systems Analysis Branch
                                                          Satellite Division
                                                          International Bureau




’    47 C.F.R. 25.1 I2(a)(1). See also Echostar Satellite LLC, Order on Reconsideration, DA 04-4056
(released December 27,2004).

     If WB files applications identical to the ones dismissed, with the exception of supplying the corrected
information, it need not pay an application fee. See 47 C.F.R. 8 1.1 I09(d).



                                                      2



Document Created: 2006-08-15 08:46:22
Document Modified: 2006-08-15 08:46:22

© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC